Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: HP ZBook Studio x360 G5 (i7, P1000, FHD) Arbetsstation (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ZBook Studio x360 G5-4QH13EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Workstation (54.8 - 200, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ZBook Studio x360 G5-4QH13EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Workstation (78.6 - 226, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 386 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1121:1 (Svärta: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
| HP ZBook Studio x360 G5-4QH13EA LGD05A9, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M Sharp SHP148D / LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.60 | Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 Sharp SHP148D, , 3840x2160, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS B156ZAN03.2, , 3840x2160, 15.60 | HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA AUO30EB, , 3840x2160, 15.60 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) APPA040, , 2880x1800, 15.40 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 9% | 29% | 26% | 1% | 26% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.5 | 76.5 15% | 91.2 37% | 86.4 30% | 68.2 3% | 98.7 48% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98 | 98.4 0% | 99.9 2% | 99.9 2% | 96.2 -2% | 99.9 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.6 | 76.4 13% | 99.4 47% | 99.1 47% | 68.8 2% | 86.6 28% |
| Response Times | -18% | -27% | -22% | -32% | -8% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41.6 ? | 48 ? -15% | 49.6 ? -19% | 55.6 ? -34% | 60.8 ? -46% | 43.2 ? -4% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 33.6 ? -20% | 37.6 ? -34% | 30.8 ? -10% | 32.8 ? -17% | 31.2 ? -11% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 | 990 ? | 117000 ? | |||
| Screen | -39% | -35% | -62% | -36% | 24% | |
| Brightness middle | 381 | 451.7 19% | 430.9 13% | 397.6 4% | 417 9% | 520 36% |
| Brightness | 362 | 440 22% | 398 10% | 396 9% | 412 14% | 492 36% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 90 6% | 79 -7% | 85 0% | 85 0% | 88 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.4 -18% | 0.35 -3% | 0.25 26% | 0.29 15% | 0.39 -15% |
| Contrast | 1121 | 1129 1% | 1231 10% | 1590 42% | 1438 28% | 1333 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 3.11 -73% | 3.29 -83% | 4.95 -175% | 4.4 -144% | 1.2 33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.6 | 8.62 -87% | 7.46 -62% | 10.23 -122% | 6.7 -46% | 2.3 50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 3.07 -207% | 3.58 -258% | 4.22 -322% | 1.9 -90% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 3.7 -106% | 2.6 -44% | 5.1 -183% | 5 -178% | 1.3 28% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.11 104% | 2.19 100% | 2.234 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.18 101% |
| CCT | 6735 97% | 6492 100% | 6870 95% | 7543 86% | 7575 86% | 6738 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.5 | 69 10% | 87.2 40% | 87.6 40% | 62.3 0% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.7 | 98 0% | 100 2% | 100 2% | 96 -2% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-28% | -11% /
-22% | -19% /
-40% | -22% /
-28% | 14% /
20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4244 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5138 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5335 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4735 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| HP ZBook Studio x360 G5-4QH13EA Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M SK hynix PC400 512 GB | Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Apple SSD AP0512 | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -1% | -6% | 1% | -21% | 12% | |
| Write 4K | 105.1 | 97.8 -7% | 128.9 23% | 108 3% | 43.59 -59% 35.92 -66% | 126.7 ? 21% |
| Read 4K | 42.66 | 41.21 -3% | 45.7 7% | 37.24 -13% | 12.68 -70% 11.67 -73% | 44 ? 3% |
| Write Seq | 1571 | 1312 -16% | 635 -60% | 1476 -6% | 1605 2% 1522 -3% | 1617 ? 3% |
| Read Seq | 1427 | 1667 17% | 2065 45% | 1367 -4% | 1595 12% 1528 7% | 1716 ? 20% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 291.2 | 449.5 54% | 336.6 16% | 302.4 4% | 232.7 -20% 204.5 -30% | 413 ? 42% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 369.9 | 327.4 -11% | 393.6 6% | 375 1% | 404 9% 393.3 6% | 420 ? 14% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2024 | 1385 -32% | 662 -67% | 2433 20% | 1770 -13% 1756 -13% | 2076 ? 3% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3392 | 2948 -13% | 2664 -21% | 3493 3% | 2993 -12% 2805 -17% | 3130 ? -8% |
| SiSoft Sandra 2016 | |
| Image Processing | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (264 - 269, n=3) | |
| HP ZBook Studio x360 G5-4QH13EA | |
| HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA | |
| GP Cryptography (Higher Security AES256+SHA2-512) | |
| HP ZBook Studio x360 G5-4QH13EA | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (10.8 - 11, n=3) | |
| HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA | |
| GP Financial Analysis (FP High/Double Precision) | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (23.2 - 23.8, n=3) | |
| HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA | |
| HP ZBook Studio x360 G5-4QH13EA | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6506 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21290 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4508 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Workstation (19.6 - 156.5, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA | |
| HP ZBook Studio x360 G5-4QH13EA | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (15.7 - 16.9, n=3) | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA | |
| Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 | |
| HP ZBook Studio x360 G5-4QH13EA | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (51 - 51.7, n=3) | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 276.8 | 155.4 | 133.8 | 51.7 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 89.4 | 52.5 | 26.1 | 16.9 |
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 172.7 | 115.1 | 62.8 | 56.1 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 88.3 | 55.7 | 29.6 | 24.1 |
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 135.8 | 80.5 | 38.7 | 35.3 |
| For Honor (2017) | 117.6 | 44.3 | 42 | 33 |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 71.7 | 31.9 | 29.1 | 15.8 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 51.9 | 25.3 | 18.2 | |
| F1 2018 (2018) | 96 | 53 | 41 | 25 |
| FIFA 19 (2018) | 204.6 | 107.8 | 99.9 | 89.5 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28.7 / 28.7 / 33.3 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 38 / 42.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.7 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-1.6 °C / -2.9 F).
HP ZBook Studio x360 G5-4QH13EA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.15 / 0.26 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 4.44 / 9.24 / 13.3 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
80.4 / 118 Watt |
   
| |
| HP ZBook Studio x360 G5-4QH13EA i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M E-2176M, Quadro P2000, SK hynix PC400 512 GB, IGZO, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 i7-8706G, WX Vega M GL, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS E-2176M, Quadro P2000 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.40 | Average NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | Average of class Workstation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -45% | -18% | -23% | 3% | -4% | -42% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.44 | 9.8 -121% | 7.4 -67% | 7.1 -60% | 3.4 23% | 5.09 ? -15% | 7.82 ? -76% |
| Idle Average * | 9.24 | 16.8 -82% | 12.4 -34% | 14.4 -56% | 11 -19% | 9.25 ? -0% | 12.7 ? -37% |
| Idle Maximum * | 13.3 | 16.9 -27% | 13.3 -0% | 14.6 -10% | 14.9 -12% | 13 ? 2% | 18.7 ? -41% |
| Load Average * | 80.4 | 102.3 -27% | 79.2 1% | 93.9 -17% | 78.9 2% | 78.2 ? 3% | 96.5 ? -20% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 66 | 76.5 -16% | 82.2 -25% | 77.9 -18% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 118 | 114.5 3% | 96.5 18% | 88.3 25% | 91.2 23% | 132.7 ? -12% | 158.9 ? -35% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP ZBook Studio x360 G5-4QH13EA i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, 97.2 Wh | Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M E-2176M, Quadro P2000, 97 Wh | Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 i7-8706G, WX Vega M GL, 75 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS E-2176M, Quadro P2000 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, 83 Wh | Average of class Workstation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -25% | -45% | -57% | 4% | -22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1446 | 991 -31% | 737 -49% | 700 ? -52% | ||
| H.264 | 566 | 701 24% | 717 ? 27% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 740 | 501 -32% | 435 -41% | 320 -57% | 614 -17% | 541 ? -27% |
| Load | 124 | 110 -11% | 70 -44% | 81.3 ? -34% | ||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 88 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Till viss del är HP ZBook Studio x360 G5 en unik laptop. Kombinationen av omvandlingsbara funktioner, en arbetsstationsdesign och aktuella sexkärniga processorer är något som ingen annan för tillfället erbjuder. Men innebär denna unikhet att ZBook Studio x360 G5 också är en bra laptop?
På många sätt gör ZBook Studio sitt höga pris på över 20.000 kronor rättvisa. Detta inkluderar exempelvis ett extremt högkvalitativt och stabilt chassi. Dessutom är det billigaste skärmalternativet bra, trots att den missar målet på 400 cd/m². Den blanka ytan kan dock vara en riktigt nackdel med skärmen. Å andra sidan övertygar poängen från batteritidssektionen ordentligt: Mer än 12 timmar i WiFi-testet är ett riktigt bra resultat. Den håller en låg temperatur på chassits utsida vid belastning och ZBook Studio x360 går att uppgradera ordentligt med två RAM-platser och två SSD-platser. Sist men inte minst har vi börjat gilla tangentbordet trots att vår enhet hade en irriterande AZERTY-layout.
Men HP uppnår inte perfektion med ZBook Studio x360; den har också ett antal brister. På en del sätt hör de faktiskt ihop med ZBooks styrkor. Som exempel så resulterar det stora batteriet och det stabila metallchassit i en jämförelsevis hög vikt på 2.4 kg, mycket mer än dess direkta konkurrenter. I synnerhet begränsas dess funktion som en surfplatta av den höga vikten. Vidare erbjuder ZBook Studio x360 mycket mer CPU-prestanda än den omvandlingsbara konkurrenten Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1, men vanliga Dell Precision 5530 och Lenovo ThinkPad P1 har både högre och mer konsekvent prestanda vid belastning. Konkurrenterna är dessutom tystare vid tomgång. På tal om hårdvara gillade vi styrplattan på ZBook Studio x360 G5, men drivrutinen lämnar en hel del att önska: ibland registreras inte klickningar korrekt.
Hög kvalitet, högt pris och hög vikt: HP ZBook Studio x360 G5 är en omvandlingsbar arbetsstation i en helt egen klass – men den är definitivt inte det bästa valet för alla arbetsstationsanvändare.
Kritiken är inte tillräcklig för att vi ska vägra en rekommendation av ZBook Studio x360 G5. Totalt sett är det en dyr enhet, men också en högkvalitativ laptop som kommer göra de flesta användare nöjda och produktiva. Frågan om huruvida konkurrenterna är bättre kvarstår förstås. Dell Precision 5530 och Lenovo ThinkPad P1 är förstås starka konkurrenter, särskilt om man inte behöver en omvandlingsbar modell. Men om en sådan önskas är HP ZBook Studio x360 G5 i princip det enda alternativet. Det är bara Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 som har en liknande kombination av funktioner – även om de har ganska olika specifikationer. ZBook har fler portar, ett mer traditionellt tangentbord och bättre CPU-prestanda. Dell Precision har högre GPU-prestanda och lägre vikt. Det är vad köparen prioriterar som i slutändan får avgöra vilken modell som är bäst.
HP ZBook Studio x360 G5-4QH13EA
-
03/26/2020 v7
Benjamin Herzig
Pricecompare
