Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Dell Latitude 13 7380 (i7-7600U, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 13 7380 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
| Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
| Dell Latitude 13 7380 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 317 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1057:1 (Svärta: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.81
| Dell Latitude 13 7380 LGD0589, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080 | Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 LP133WF2-SPL78, IPS, LED, 13.30, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE B140HAN03_1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD AUO123D, TN, 14.00, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -37% | -5% | -13% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.5 | 66.4 1% | 40.16 -39% | 61.6 -6% | 55.8 -15% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.8 | 93.5 2% | 60 -35% | 87.6 -5% | 80.7 -12% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.8 | 66.6 1% | 41.54 -37% | 62.6 -5% | 57.7 -12% |
| Response Times | -4% | -7% | -22% | 4% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 ? | 36.8 ? -8% | 43.6 ? -28% | 48 ? -41% | 39 ? -15% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29.6 ? | 29.6 ? -0% | 25.2 ? 15% | 30.4 ? -3% | 23 ? 22% |
| PWM Frequency | 30860 ? | ||||
| Screen | 20% | -7% | 19% | -37% | |
| Brightness middle | 317 | 332.6 5% | 306 -3% | 278 -12% | 346 9% |
| Brightness | 295 | 323 9% | 307 4% | 271 -8% | 317 7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 86 -1% | 89 2% | 91 5% | 86 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.28 7% | 0.36 -20% | 0.16 47% | 0.86 -187% |
| Contrast | 1057 | 1188 12% | 850 -20% | 1738 64% | 402 -62% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.3 | 2.6 59% | 5.1 19% | 4.5 29% | 8.64 -37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.4 | 6.7 36% | 13.3 -28% | 8.4 19% | 13.58 -31% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.8 | 2.5 68% | 3.9 50% | 3.2 59% | 11.24 -44% |
| Gamma | 1.81 122% | 2.12 104% | 2.17 101% | 2.02 109% | 2.62 84% |
| CCT | 7120 91% | 6720 97% | 6829 95% | 7042 92% | 12530 52% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 62 2% | 38.24 -37% | 57 -7% | 52 -15% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 94 2% | 59.75 -35% | 87.5 -5% | 80 -13% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
13% | -17% /
-13% | -3% /
9% | -15% /
-27% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Dell Latitude 13 7370 | |
| Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
| Dell Latitude 13 7380 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3872 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4958 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5060 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3711 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Dell Latitude 13 7380 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -676% | -35% | -48% | -3% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 664 | 447.8 -33% | 229 -66% | 355.1 -47% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 451 | 316.3 -30% | 172.4 -62% | 269.7 -40% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1250 | 382.9 -69% | 623 -50% | 735 -41% | |
| Score Total | 4063 | 2687 -34% | 1256 -69% | 1398 -66% | 3006 -26% |
| Score Write | 690 | 162 -77% | 557 -19% | 337 -51% | 767 11% |
| Score Read | 2251 | 1723 -23% | 481 -79% | 726 -68% | 1524 -32% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.028 | 2.01 -7079% | 0.033 -18% | 0.034 -21% | 0.027 4% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.045 | 0.05 -11% | 0.076 -69% | 0.102 -127% | 0.044 2% |
| 4K-64 Write | 484.5 | 125.8 -74% | 361.5 -25% | 149.6 -69% | 510 5% |
| 4K-64 Read | 2072 | 1483 -28% | 264.7 -87% | 526 -75% | 1215 -41% |
| 4K Write | 125.1 | 1.2 -99% | 101.9 -19% | 109.4 -13% | 140.2 12% |
| 4K Read | 45.59 | 42.8 -6% | 38.7 -15% | 34.34 -25% | 49.21 8% |
| Seq Write | 805 | 352.7 -56% | 935 16% | 775 -4% | 1167 45% |
| Seq Read | 1330 | 1972 48% | 1775 33% | 1649 24% | 2603 96% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell Latitude 13 7380 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
| Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| Dell Latitude 13 7370 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
| Dell Latitude 13 7380 | |
| Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| Dell Latitude 13 7370 | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
| Dell Latitude 13 7380 | |
| Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
| Dell Latitude 13 7370 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 8937 poäng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1762 poäng | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 46459 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6363 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 853 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 388 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 44 | 27 | 22 | 7 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28 / 28 / 29.6 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 30.6 / 35.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28 dB(A) | ||
| Dell Latitude 13 7380 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -1% | -7% | -7% | |
| off / environment * | 28 | 28.4 -1% | 29.1 -4% | 29.6 -6% | 31 -11% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28 | 28.4 -1% | 29.1 -4% | 29.6 -6% | 31 -11% |
| Idle Average * | 28 | 28.4 -1% | 29.1 -4% | 29.6 -6% | 31 -11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.6 | 28.4 4% | 29.1 2% | 32.2 -9% | 31 -5% |
| Load Average * | 30.6 | 33.2 -8% | 31.9 -4% | 34.2 -12% | 33.5 -9% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.4 | 37.9 -7% | 31.9 10% | 36.1 -2% | 33.7 5% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.9 °C / -1.6 F).
Dell Latitude 13 7380 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.4 / 0.6 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 3.2 / 5.5 / 6.1 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
29.5 / 32 Watt |
   
| |
| Dell Latitude 13 7380 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -17% | -6% | -27% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 4.6 -44% | 3.16 1% | 3.8 -19% | 2.9 9% |
| Idle Average * | 5.5 | 7.6 -38% | 5.9 -7% | 7.1 -29% | 5.6 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.1 | 8.2 -34% | 6.5 -7% | 8.3 -36% | 8.15 -34% |
| Load Average * | 29.5 | 23.8 19% | 30.6 -4% | 34.2 -16% | 30.6 -4% |
| Load Maximum * | 32 | 28 12% | 35.8 -12% | 43.3 -35% | 31 3% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Latitude 13 7380 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Dell Latitude 13 7370 6Y57, HD Graphics 515, 34 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -30% | -36% | -25% | -2% | -27% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1594 | 898 -44% | 904 -43% | 819 -49% | 1155 -28% | 588 -63% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 630 | 430 -32% | 475 -25% | 547 -13% | 571 -9% | 367 -42% |
| Load | 141 | 121 -14% | 85 -40% | 122 -13% | 184 30% | 176 25% |
För
Emot
Dells Latitude 7380 ligger mittemellan skärmstorleken på deras nuvarande flaggskepp i Latitude 7000-serien, 7280 och 7480 - men på många sätt är den mindre av en kompromiss och mer av en utveckling mellan generationerna. 7380 tar lärdom av XPS 13 och pressar in en 13.3-tums skärm i fotavtrycket (och, i huvudsak, hela kroppen) på den existerande 12.5-tums 7280 - och ersätter således den modellen på många sätt. Best av allt, det finns inga större nackdelar med detta: höljet har fortfarande väldigt bra stabilitet och även om skärmlocket inte riktigt kan matcha stelheten hos XPS 13:s aluminiumram så är Latitudes magnesiumkonstruktion inte på något sätt ömtålig.
Dells Latitude 7380 ligger mittemellan skärmstorleksmässigt - men på många sätt är den mindre av en kompromiss och mer av en utveckling mellan generationerna. Den utgår från grunden som lagts av instegs-modellen XPS 13 men levererar all företags-medvetenhet som kommer med Latitude-märket.
Vi var också nöjda med 7380:s utmärkta systemprestanda och de i huvudsak konsekventa CPU-hastigheterna vid belastning; tillsammans med den låga yttemperaturen och det i huvudsak diskreta fläktljudet så är resultatet imponerande för en maskin i den här storleken. Ännu mer imponerande är våra batteritester, där vi lyckades uppnå över tio timmar websurfande på en enda laddning. För att runda av detta är IPS-skärmen på 1080p också över genomsnittet - även om den kräver professionell kalibrering för att få någon nivå av färgnoggranhet.
Våra enda större klagomål är dom någorlunda hörbara elektroniska ljuden/spoltjuten, skärmens inexakthet efter uppackning och det tidigare nämnda höga priset på ca 18 400 kronor ($2,178). Det är också en viss besvikelse att endast enkel-kanalsminne stöds, även om den totala kapaciteten på 16 GB är tillräckligt för en laptop i denna kategori. Värdiga konkurrenter från andra tillverkare inkluderar Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon, HP EliteBook 840 G4 och Toshiba Portege X30-D, varav en del är billigare än Latitude men som alla kommer med sina egna unika uppsättningar för och nackdelar.
Varför välja Latitude 7380 när Dell redan tillverkar en så utmärkt (och liknande) avancerad ultraportabel laptop som XPS 13? I huvudsak på grund av den företags-medvetenhet som kommer med Latitude-märket. Förutom sin kännetecknande subtila, svarta design så erbjuder 7380 ett överlägset tangentbord, en styrplatta med separata fysiska knappar, en Ethernet-port, längre garanti och betydligt mer flexibla möjligheter till underhåll. Den kostar också en hel del mer än XPS, men det är ett litet pris att betala om den får jobbet gjort.
Dell Latitude 13 7380
-
12/06/2017 v6(old)
Steve Schardein
Pricecompare
