Notebookcheck

Test: Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - Gigantisk men tunn spellaptop med 300 Hz-skärm (Sammanfattning)

17 tum, spelhårdvara och kompakt. Asus försöker kombinera dessa aspekter i Zephyrus S17. Med Max-Q versionen av Nvidias RTX 2080 Super och en kraftfull Intel Core i7-10875H processor har den uppfyllt grunderna och med hjälp av diverse trick ska kylningen tydligen vara säkrad. Vår recension kommer att avgöra huruvida konceptet faktiskt fungerar i praktiken.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Processor
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8192 MB, Kärna: 735 MHz, Minne: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, NVIDIA 442.80, Intel UHD Graphis 630
Minne
32768 MB 
, DDR4-3200, Dubbla kanaler
Skärm
17.3 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, Sharp SHP14DC, IPS, G-Sync, glansig: nej, 300 Hz
Moderkort
Intel HM470
Hårddisk
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB 
, 890 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad ljudanslutning på 3.5 mm
Nätverk
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 18.7 x 399 x 272
Batteri
76 Wh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2 högtalare, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 240 Watt, Nätadapter på 65 Watt, Armoury Crate, GameFirst VI, GameVisual, Sonic Studio III, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.62 kg, Strömförsörjning: 615 g
Pris
3300 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82 %
08/2020
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
2.6 kg18.7 mm17.3"1920x1080
87 %
06/2020
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.7 kg19.9 mm17.3"1920x1080
84 %
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.3 kg18.9 mm17.3"1920x1080
84 %
05/2020
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
3 kg25.5 mm17.3"1920x1080
84 %
03/2020
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.6 kg20.5 mm17.3"1920x1080
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS

Storleksjämförelse

412 mm 305 mm 25.5 mm 3 kg399.8 mm 295.5 mm 20.5 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 272 mm 18.7 mm 2.6 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.7 kg396 mm 259 mm 18.9 mm 2.3 kg
Vänster: Ström, HDMI 2.0b, 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Typ A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Typ C (med DisplayPort 1.4), Kombinerad 3.5 mm ljudanslutning
Vänster: Ström, HDMI 2.0b, 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Typ A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Typ C (med DisplayPort 1.4), Kombinerad 3.5 mm ljudanslutning
Höger: 2x USB 3.2 Gen1 Typ A, 1x Thunderbolt 3 (med DisplayPort 1.4, Power Delivery 3.0), Kensington-lås
Höger: 2x USB 3.2 Gen1 Typ A, 1x Thunderbolt 3 (med DisplayPort 1.4, Power Delivery 3.0), Kensington-lås
Framsidan: Inga portar
Framsidan: Inga portar
Baksidan: Inga portar
Baksidan: Inga portar
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1260 MBit/s ∼100%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (289 - 1722, n=82)
1186 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1182 (min: 1085, max: 1338) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1177 (min: 773, max: 1353) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1390 MBit/s ∼100%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1283 (min: 1089, max: 1413) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1270 (min: 1080, max: 1388) MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=82)
1065 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
348
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
Sharp SHP14DC
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 348 cd/m² Medel: 310.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 76 %
Mitt på batteriet: 308 cd/m²
Kontrast: 906:1 (Svärta: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.49 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 0.99
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6
96% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 74% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.193
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Sharp SHP14DC, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Sharp LQ173M1JW05, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
AUO_B173HAN03, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
-16%
9%
-129%
-140%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5 (2.2, 2.8)
5.6 (2.6, 3)
-12%
5 (2.2, 2.8)
-0%
16 (8, 8)
-220%
17.2 (8.8, 8.4)
-244%
Response Time Black / White *
8 (3.6, 4.4)
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
-20%
6.6 (2.6, 4)
17%
11 (6, 5)
-38%
10.8 (6, 4.8)
-35%
PWM Frequency
26320 (25)
Screen
-59%
-8%
-35%
13%
Brightness middle
308
328
6%
299.4
-3%
310
1%
384.2
25%
Brightness
310
329
6%
299
-4%
281
-9%
357
15%
Brightness Distribution
76
78
3%
84
11%
85
12%
90
18%
Black Level *
0.34
0.35
-3%
0.31
9%
0.31
9%
0.29
15%
Contrast
906
937
3%
966
7%
1000
10%
1325
46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.49
4.74
-218%
1.82
-22%
3.86
-159%
1.35
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.97
8.99
-126%
3.91
2%
7.8
-96%
3.45
13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.99
2.12
-114%
1.59
-61%
1.42
-43%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.3
6.8
-196%
2.7
-17%
4.48
-95%
1.2
48%
Gamma
2.193 100%
2.2 100%
2.18 101%
2.5 88%
2.23 99%
CCT
6981 93%
6446 101%
6837 95%
7542 86%
6580 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
74
64.8
-12%
67.1
-9%
60
-19%
65.5
-11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
98.6
3%
99.8
4%
93
-3%
98.5
3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-38% / -52%
1% / -5%
-82% / -51%
-64% / -11%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.2 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17683 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - CPUz
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - CPUz
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - CPUz
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - CPUz
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - GPUz
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - HWInfo
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1561 (1522.36-1646.36)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1362 (1352.68-1494.38)
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1620 (1596.04-1713.21)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1123 (1105.49-1224.89)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1640 (1625.22-1699.96)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (190 - 214, n=24)
204 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
201.96 Points ∼99%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
200 Points ∼98% -1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
198 Points ∼97% -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
195 Points ∼96% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼86% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 219, n=605)
161 Points ∼79% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1754 Points ∼100% +7%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
1713 (min: 1596.04, max: 1713.21) Points ∼98% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
1646 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1111 - 1833, n=24)
1567 Points ∼89% -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
1549 (min: 1352.68, max: 1494.38) Points ∼88% -6%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
1225 Points ∼70% -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=609)
911 Points ∼52% -45%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 901, n=71)
392 Seconds * ∼100% -40%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
389.5 Seconds * ∼99% -39%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (280 - 386, n=16)
326 Seconds * ∼83% -16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
324 Seconds * ∼83% -15%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
281 Seconds * ∼72%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
280 Seconds * ∼71% -0%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
48397 MIPS ∼100% +8%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
44947 MIPS ∼93%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
44947 MIPS ∼93% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (33674 - 48397, n=17)
42222 MIPS ∼87% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (3034 - 75612, n=72)
36659 MIPS ∼76% -18%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
33674 MIPS ∼70% -25%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
33364 MIPS ∼69% -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5232 - 5605, n=17)
5354 MIPS ∼100% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
5284 MIPS ∼99%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
5284 MIPS ∼99% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
5245 MIPS ∼98% -1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
5232 MIPS ∼98% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2480 - 5674, n=72)
4876 MIPS ∼91% -8%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
4585 MIPS ∼86% -13%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (461 - 511, n=18)
489 Points ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
483 Points ∼99% +5%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
478 Points ∼98% +4%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
475 Points ∼97% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
461 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 511, n=117)
448 Points ∼92% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points ∼88% -7%
CPU (Multi Core)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
4136 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
3917 Points ∼95%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
3885 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (2800 - 4133, n=18)
3444 Points ∼83% -12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
3367 Points ∼81% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 6321, n=118)
2942 Points ∼71% -25%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
2738 Points ∼66% -30%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
8363 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (6988 - 8620, n=16)
7743 Points ∼93% +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
7531 Points ∼90% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
7474 Points ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (3448 - 10190, n=54)
6628 Points ∼79% -11%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
5909 Points ∼71% -21%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
1307 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1233 - 1371, n=16)
1302 Points ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
1278 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
1271 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (874 - 1401, n=54)
1216 Points ∼93% -7%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
1128 Points ∼86% -14%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.8 fps ∼100%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (10.1 - 13, n=15)
11.5 fps ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.7 - 18.9, n=71)
10 fps ∼78% -22%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
9.47 fps ∼74% -26%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
57.8 s ∼100% +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (28.6 - 95.8, n=48)
57.7 s ∼100% +21%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (43 - 84.3, n=16)
52.2 s ∼90% +9%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
50.2 s ∼87% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
47.7 s ∼83%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.676 sec * ∼100% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.546 - 0.761, n=52)
0.614 sec * ∼91% -5%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.589 sec * ∼87% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.583 sec * ∼86%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (0.547 - 0.59, n=15)
0.578 sec * ∼86% +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
201.96 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
136.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.62 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1646 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
9082 Points ∼100% +79%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
8560 Points ∼94% +69%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8240 Points ∼91% +63%
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11245, n=285)
6468 Points ∼71% +28%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (4747 - 7296, n=4)
6074 Points ∼67% +20%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
5514 Points ∼61% +9%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5069 Points ∼56%
Productivity
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
8469 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8386 Points ∼99%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
8253 Points ∼97% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (7633 - 8386, n=4)
8106 Points ∼96% -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
8028 Points ∼95% -4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7749 Points ∼91% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 9077, n=286)
7304 Points ∼86% -13%
Essentials
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
10064 Points ∼100% +10%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
9933 Points ∼99% +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
9831 Points ∼98% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (9118 - 9599, n=4)
9290 Points ∼92% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9140 Points ∼91%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8827 Points ∼88% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 11266, n=287)
8754 Points ∼87% -4%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6370 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6317 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
6191 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (5682 - 6370, n=3)
6131 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5949 Points ∼93% -7%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
5818 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6825, n=446)
5115 Points ∼80% -20%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5539 Points ∼100% +19%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
5217 Points ∼94% +12%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
4780 Points ∼86% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4666 Points ∼84%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (4375 - 4666, n=3)
4569 Points ∼82% -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
4384 Points ∼79% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=463)
4293 Points ∼78% -8%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4666 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6370 poäng
Hjälp
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
1029.5 μs * ∼100% -127%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
453 μs * ∼44%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
364 μs * ∼35% +20%

* ... smaller is better

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Lite-On CA5-8D512
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
9%
18%
1%
4%
7%
Write 4K
120
119
-1%
177.9
48%
101.2
-16%
110.6
-8%
142 (118 - 173, n=11)
18%
Read 4K
45.24
51.87
15%
47.42
5%
44.61
-1%
41.46
-8%
47.7 (43.7 - 51.9, n=11)
5%
Write Seq
2090
2258
8%
2707
30%
2295
10%
2378
14%
1897 (1067 - 2854, n=10)
-9%
Read Seq
2246
2283
2%
2369
5%
2174
-3%
2114
-6%
1803 (973 - 2359, n=10)
-20%
Write 4K Q32T1
392.5
491
25%
427.8
9%
401.2
2%
445.4
13%
449 (268 - 576, n=11)
14%
Read 4K Q32T1
348.4
539.7
55%
543.2
56%
475.5
36%
509.3
46%
498 (348 - 655, n=11)
43%
Write Seq Q32T1
3015
2253
-25%
2703
-10%
2397.2
-20%
2735
-9%
3000 (2936 - 3033, n=11)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3445
3172
-8%
3387
-2%
3336.8
-3%
3206
-7%
3475 (3195 - 3568, n=11)
1%
AS SSD
-60%
-13%
9%
-27%
13%
Score Total
4283
2392
-44%
3366
-21%
4630
8%
3624
-15%
4780 (3309 - 5810, n=11)
12%
Score Write
2170
1034
-52%
1343
-38%
2034
-6%
1447
-33%
2041 (1471 - 2327, n=11)
-6%
Score Read
1439
913
-37%
1328
-8%
1729
20%
1437
0%
1814 (1154 - 2339, n=11)
26%
Access Time Write *
0.034
0.167
-391%
0.071
-109%
0.039
-15%
0.107
-215%
0.0366 (0.024 - 0.086, n=11)
-8%
Access Time Read *
0.064
0.058
9%
0.076
-19%
0.05
22%
0.051
20%
0.0521 (0.032 - 0.087, n=11)
19%
4K-64 Write
1925.76
812.64
-58%
938.15
-51%
1697.03
-12%
1137.27
-41%
1692 (1074 - 1926, n=11)
-12%
4K-64 Read
1117.55
664.71
-41%
1049.71
-6%
1405.89
26%
1217.48
9%
1520 (878 - 2011, n=11)
36%
4K Write
109.08
90.18
-17%
157.4
44%
94.81
-13%
100.83
-8%
125 (88.2 - 156, n=11)
15%
4K Read
47.24
46.61
-1%
45.46
-4%
42.77
-9%
25.88
-45%
52.9 (45.5 - 61.4, n=11)
12%
Seq Write
1350.94
1314.33
-3%
2479.16
84%
2424
79%
2093.64
55%
2244 (1351 - 2649, n=11)
66%
Seq Read
2743.71
2019.26
-26%
2326.96
-15%
2800
2%
1937.52
-29%
2411 (1950 - 2744, n=11)
-12%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-26% / -31%
3% / -0%
5% / 6%
-12% / -14%
10% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3445 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3015 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 348.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 392.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2246 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2090 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.24 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 120 MB/s

Constant Performance Reads: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410142014301440145014601470148014901500151015201530154015501560157015801590160016101620163016401650166016701680169017001710172017301740175017601770178017901800181018201830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010202020302040205020602070208020902100211021202130214021502160217021802190220022102220223022402250226022702280229023002310232023302340235023602370238023902400241024202430244024502460247024802490250025102520253025402550256025702580259026002610262026302640265026602670268026902700271027202730274027502760277027802790280028102820283028402850286028702880289029002910292029302940295029602970298029903000301030203030304030503060307030803090310031103120313031403150316031703180319032003210322032303240325032603270328032903300331033203330334033503360337033803390340034103420343034403450346034703480Tooltip
: Ø3436 (3311.7-3472.46)
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
32995 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (26292 - 32995, n=9)
29497 Points ∼89% -11%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29220 Points ∼89% -11%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
27694 Points ∼84% -16%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
27203 Points ∼82% -18%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
24066 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=703)
14573 Points ∼44% -56%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
8906 Points ∼100%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8479 Points ∼95% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (7372 - 8979, n=10)
8179 Points ∼92% -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
8065 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7597 Points ∼85% -15%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
7057 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=239)
5962 Points ∼67% -33%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
23649 Points ∼100%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
22391 Points ∼95% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (19655 - 23649, n=9)
21644 Points ∼92% -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21191 Points ∼90% -10%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
18877 Points ∼80% -20%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18517 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=626)
12141 Points ∼51% -49%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
134255 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
128974 Points ∼96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (101976 - 140750, n=7)
126108 Points ∼94% -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
124815 Points ∼93% -3%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
121539 Points ∼91% -6%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
114826 Points ∼86% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=603)
71442 Points ∼53% -45%
3DMark 11 Performance
25058 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
45467 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
19929 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
8883 poäng
Hjälp
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (74.3 - 96, n=10)
85 fps ∼100% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
82.6 (min: 69) fps ∼97%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
81 (min: 72, max: 91) fps ∼95% -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
80.9 (min: 75, max: 90) fps ∼95% -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
78 fps ∼92% -6%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
67.5 (min: 61, max: 75) fps ∼79% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=401)
53.2 fps ∼63% -36%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
85.3 fps ∼100% +3%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
83.7 fps ∼98% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
82.8 fps ∼97%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
81.6 fps ∼96% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (76.8 - 84.3, n=5)
80.8 fps ∼95% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.2 - 93.8, n=78)
69.6 fps ∼82% -16%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
126 (min: 108.2) fps ∼100% +7%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
126 (min: 109.8) fps ∼100% +7%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
119.6 (min: 103.2) fps ∼95% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (115 - 125, n=5)
118 fps ∼94% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
117.7 (min: 102.5) fps ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 134, n=75)
105 fps ∼83% -11%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
135 (min: 117.7) fps ∼100% +9%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
133 (min: 116) fps ∼99% +7%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
126.4 (min: 110.3) fps ∼94% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (117 - 139, n=5)
125 fps ∼93% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
124.2 (min: 108) fps ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 148, n=72)
111 fps ∼82% -11%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
101 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (91 - 102, n=3)
98 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 113, n=54)
72.1 fps ∼71% -29%
Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
177.68 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (140 - 178, n=8)
156 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (93.3 - 191, n=25)
139 fps ∼78% -22%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (67 - 80.8, n=2)
73.9 fps ∼100% +10%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
66.99 fps ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.8 - 108, n=53)
55.3 fps ∼75% -17%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø83.3 (73-88)
låg med. hög ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 82.6 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 146.6 135.8 124.2 117.7 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 66.99 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 114 97.6 82.8 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 101 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 177.68 fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
32 / 35 / 43 dB(A)
Hög belastning
44 / 45 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.334.633.230.525.335.12537.535.733.630.935.9343136.234.829.926.334.226.24036.339.136.534.434.944.75039.635.734.731.331.537.56334.536.233.125.52534.88028.825.627.725.222.127.610024.62321.321.522.624.112528.623.425.418.717.928.21603226.628.32720.429.720030.129.830.523.315.829.72503021.625.419.613.928.33153021.425.72113.429.74003224.628.320.812.430.950030.924.827.720.612.330.363030.82227.619.911.130.280031.52329.922.410.931.6100031.622.62921.711.231.4125033.524.731.622.113.433.3160034.424.433.52111.734.3200035.424.833.621.311.835.4250035.324.533.820.912.334.8315036.224.934.820.712.735.5400033.620.831.31912.433.2500032.517.929.415.212.832.5630029.316.327.814.112.928.8800025.615.223.913.412.924.31000022.216.819.81412.819.51250020.215.617.713.912.716.81600018.313.514.513.41214.8SPL45.23543.432.124.644.8N52.24.21.60.64.8median 30.9median 23median 28.3median 20.7median 12.7median 30.2Delta2.52.73.12.51.73.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
 56 °C57 °C54 °C 
 49 °C52 °C46 °C 
 39 °C38 °C36 °C 
Max: 57 °C
Medel: 47.4 °C
50 °C50 °C51 °C
49 °C49 °C50 °C
42 °C43 °C42 °C
Max: 51 °C
Medel: 47.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  54 °C | Rumstemperatur 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 42.6 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-11.2 °C / -20.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2025.330.12535.932.43134.233.34034.935.85031.536.7632533.58022.129.210022.63912517.958.516020.46420015.865.225013.967.331513.466.540012.469.550012.368.563011.172.180010.970.2100011.269.6125013.471160011.772.3200011.872.5250012.374315012.772400012.468.6500012.868.9630012.966.4800012.959.61000012.859.11250012.756.4160001250.9SPL24.682.5N0.656.8median 12.7median 68.5Delta1.75.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.6 / 2.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 10 / 16 / 29 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 143 / 205 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-25%
-26%
-18%
-75%
-6%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
10
19.6
-96%
19.2
-92%
15.7
-57%
24.7
-147%
13.5 (10 - 23, n=7)
-35%
18.8 (1.9 - 113, n=784)
-88%
Idle Average *
16
21.7
-36%
22.4
-40%
26.3
-64%
35.9
-124%
17.9 (13.1 - 30, n=7)
-12%
24.2 (6 - 119, n=784)
-51%
Idle Maximum *
29
36.1
-24%
34.7
-20%
28
3%
69.6
-140%
28.3 (15.8 - 42, n=7)
2%
29.8 (8.3 - 122, n=784)
-3%
Load Average *
143
115.6
19%
106.7
25%
136
5%
141.8
1%
125 (94.8 - 156, n=7)
13%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=775)
27%
Witcher 3 ultra *
146
157
-8%
160.5
-10%
160
-10%
185.8
-27%
Load Maximum *
205
219.9
-7%
248.7
-21%
177
14%
235.4
-15%
203 (169 - 211, n=7)
1%
175 (21.9 - 590, n=774)
15%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
3tim 28min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2tim 50min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 28min
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 76 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
74%
132%
-1%
37%
40%
Reader / Idle
208
513
147%
229
10%
426
105%
361 (39 - 1174, n=725)
74%
WiFi v1.3
170
296
74%
295
74%
178
5%
290
71%
266 (62 - 622, n=439)
56%
Load
88
243
176%
73
-17%
31
-65%
79.7 (18 - 243, n=693)
-9%

För

+ Väldigt bra spelprestanda
+ Smidig bilduppdatering även i det "tysta" läget
+ 300 Hz-skärm med tilltalande bild
+ Bra kylsystem

Emot

- Saknar kortläsare
- Saknar Gigabit LAN
- Liten styrplatta

Omdöme - En modern spellaptop med hög prestanda

Recension av Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS. Recensionsex från Asus Germany.
Recension av Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS. Recensionsex från Asus Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Köper du Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS kommer du inte behöva oroa dig för hårdvarans prestanda på väldigt länge. Detta räcker helt och hållet för aktuella spel och de kan till och med spelas i det tystare "Quiet"-läget som gör att fläktarna inte längre låter som ett motorrum. I vårt tycke fungerar Asus kyllösning bra och vi påverkades inte av den resulterande tangentbordsplaceringen i vårt dagliga arbete. Men den lilla öppningen på höljets undersida när locket är öppnat skapar ett väldigt instabilt intryck, så vi skulle bara använda Zephyrus S17 på ett fast underlag.

Asus Zephyrus S17 har massor av prestanda som den dessutom kan upprätthålla under längre tidsperioder tack vare ett raffinerat kylsystem.

Men den som vill få ut mesta möjliga från sin Asus Zephyrus S17 kommer förr eller senare vilja använda "Turbo"-läget. I synnerhet lär prestandakraven vara högre för 4K eller VR-program än för de Full HD-spel vi testat här. Vi hade dock oroat oss mindre för konsekvent prestanda och mer för ljudnivån. När fläktarna sätter igång helt och hållet är det bara hörlurar som gäller. Men eftersom detta inte är något ovanligt för en spellaptop lämnar Asus Zephyrus S17 ändå ett totalt sett bra intryck.

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS - 08/16/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Design
80 / 98 → 81%
Tangentbord
77%
Mus
69%
Anslutningar
61 / 80 → 76%
Vikt
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Batteri
51 / 95 → 54%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
96%
Programprestanda
92%
Temperatur
75 / 95 → 79%
Ljudnivå
66 / 90 → 73%
Audio
89%
Medel
69%
82%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - Gigantisk men tunn spellaptop med 300 Hz-skärm (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2020-08-20 (Update: 2020-08-20)