Test: Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - Gigantisk men tunn spellaptop med 300 Hz-skärm (Sammanfattning)

Name: Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Brand: Asus

17 tum, spelhårdvara och kompakt. Asus försöker kombinera dessa aspekter i Zephyrus S17. Med Max-Q versionen av Nvidias RTX 2080 Super och en kraftfull Intel Core i7-10875H processor har den uppfyllt grunderna och med hjälp av diverse trick ska kylningen tydligen vara säkrad. Vår recension kommer att avgöra huruvida konceptet faktiskt fungerar i praktiken.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 08/20/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Windows Laptop / Notebook Comet Lake

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS (ROG Zephyrus S GX701 Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 735 MHz, Minne: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, NVIDIA 442.80, Intel UHD Graphis 630

Minne

32 GB

, DDR4-3200, Dubbla kanaler

Skärm

17.30 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, Sharp SHP14DC, IPS, G-Sync, glansig: nej, 300 Hz

Moderkort

Intel HM470

Hårddisk

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB

, 890 GB ledigt

Ljudkort

Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS

Anslutningar

2 USB 3.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad ljudanslutning på 3.5 mm

Nätverk

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 18.7 x 399 x 272

Batteri

76 Wh Litiumjon

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Övrigt

Högtalare: 2 högtalare, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 240 Watt, Nätadapter på 65 Watt, Armoury Crate, GameFirst VI, GameVisual, Sonic Studio III, 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.62 kg, Strömförsörjning: 615 g

Pris

3300 Kr

Länkar

Asus hemsida
Asus kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
82.4 %	08/2020	Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	2.6 kg	18.7 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
87.4 %	06/2020	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.7 kg	19.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
83.7 %		MSI GS75 10SF-609US i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.3 kg	18.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
84 %	05/2020	Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	3 kg	25.5 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
84.2 %	03/2020	Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	2.6 kg	20.5 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Alienware m17 R2 P41E Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz MSI GS75 10SF-609US DIN A4 ❌

Vänster: Ström, HDMI 2.0b, 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Typ A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Typ C (med DisplayPort 1.4), Kombinerad 3.5 mm ljudanslutning

Höger: 2x USB 3.2 Gen1 Typ A, 1x Thunderbolt 3 (med DisplayPort 1.4, Power Delivery 3.0), Kensington-lås

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1390 MBit/s
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1283 (1089^min - 1413^max) MBit/s -8%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1270 (1080^min - 1388^max) MBit/s -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s -16%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1260 MBit/s
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1182 (1085^min - 1338^max) MBit/s -6%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1177 (773^min - 1353^max) MBit/s -7%


348 cd/m²	342 cd/m²	346 cd/m²
313 cd/m²	308 cd/m²	317 cd/m²
272 cd/m²	265 cd/m²	281 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

Sharp SHP14DC tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 348 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 310.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 76 %
Mitt på batteriet: 308 cd/m²
Kontrast: 906:1 (Svärta: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.99
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
74% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.193

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Sharp SHP14DC, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI GS75 10SF-609US Sharp LQ173M1JW05, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE AUO_B173HAN03, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Alienware m17 R2 P41E Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display		-1%	2%	-10%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	73.6	72.2 -2%	75.6 3%	63.8 -13%	70.8 -4%
sRGB Coverage	99.7	98.5 -1%	99.8 0%	92.7 -7%	98.5 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	73.7	73 -1%	75.1 2%	65.3 -11%	72.2 -2%
Response Times		-16%	9%	-129%	-140%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	5 ?(2.2, 2.8)	5.6 ?(2.6, 3) -12%	5 ?(2.2, 2.8) -0%	16 ?(8, 8) -220%	17.2 ?(8.8, 8.4) -244%
Response Time Black / White *	8 ?(3.6, 4.4)	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) -20%	6.6 ?(2.6, 4) 17%	11 ?(6, 5) -38%	10.8 ?(6, 4.8) -35%
PWM Frequency					26320 ?(25)
Screen		-59%	-8%	-35%	13%
Brightness middle	308	328 6%	299.4 -3%	310 1%	384.2 25%
Brightness	310	329 6%	299 -4%	281 -9%	357 15%
Brightness Distribution	76	78 3%	84 11%	85 12%	90 18%
Black Level *	0.34	0.35 -3%	0.31 9%	0.31 9%	0.29 15%
Contrast	906	937 3%	966 7%	1000 10%	1325 46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.49	4.74 -218%	1.82 -22%	3.86 -159%	1.35 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.97	8.99 -126%	3.91 2%	7.8 -96%	3.45 13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.99	2.12 -114%	1.59 -61%		1.42 -43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.3	6.8 -196%	2.7 -17%	4.48 -95%	1.2 48%
Gamma	2.193 ^100%	2.2 ^100%	2.18 ^101%	2.5 ^88%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6981 ^93%	6446 ^101%	6837 ^95%	7542 ^86%	6580 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	74	64.8 -12%	67.1 -9%	60 -19%	65.5 -11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	96	98.6 3%	99.8 4%	93 -3%	98.5 3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-25% / -43%	1% / -4%	-58% / -43%	-43% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.6 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.2 ms rise
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1561 (1522.36-1646.36)

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1362 (1352.68-1494.38)

MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1620 (1596.04-1713.21)

Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1123 (1105.49-1224.89)

Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1640 (1625.22-1699.96)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=236, last 2 years)	269 Points +33%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (190 - 220, n=37)	204 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	202 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	200 Points -1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	198 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	195 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	175 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=237, last 2 years)	3111 Points +89%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	1754 Points +7%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	1713 (1596.04^min - 1713.21^max) Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	1646 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1003 - 1833, n=38)	1554 Points -6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	1549 (1352.68^min - 1494.38^max) Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	1225 Points -26%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	389.5 Seconds * -39%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (259 - 535, n=30)	327 Seconds * -16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	324 Seconds * -15%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	281 Seconds *
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	280 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years)	198.5 Seconds * +29%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=231, last 2 years)	6142 MIPS +16%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5071 - 5780, n=31)	5360 MIPS +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	5284 MIPS
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	5284 MIPS 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	5245 MIPS -1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	5232 MIPS -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	4585 MIPS -13%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=231, last 2 years)	77566 MIPS +73%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	48397 MIPS +8%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	44947 MIPS
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	44947 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (29844 - 49562, n=31)	43117 MIPS -4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	33674 MIPS -25%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	33364 MIPS -26%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=232, last 2 years)	701 Points +52%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (430 - 524, n=32)	486 Points +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	483 Points +5%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	478 Points +4%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	475 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	461 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	429 Points -7%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=232, last 2 years)	7470 Points +91%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	4136 Points +6%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	3917 Points
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	3885 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1986 - 4176, n=32)	3455 Points -12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	3367 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	2738 Points -30%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=235, last 2 years)	1813 Points +39%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	1307 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1233 - 1371, n=29)	1304 Points 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	1278 Points -2%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	1271 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	1128 Points -14%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=235, last 2 years)	13658 Points +83%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	8363 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5715 - 8620, n=29)	7734 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	7531 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	7474 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	5909 Points -21%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=234, last 2 years)	21.3 fps +66%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	12.8 fps
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	12.8 fps 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (7.27 - 14.1, n=27)	11.7 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	9.47 fps -26%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	57.8 s * -21%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (30.2 - 84.3, n=30)	50.3 s * -5%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	50.2 s * -5%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=229, last 2 years)	49.3 s * -3%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	47.7 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	0.676 sec * -16%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	0.589 sec * -1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	0.583 sec *
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (0.546 - 0.662, n=29)	0.582 sec * -0%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=231, last 2 years)	0.4679 sec * +20%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

202 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

136.2 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1646 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Essentials
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)	10731 Points +17%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	10064 Points +10%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	9933 Points +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	9831 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (9118 - 9599, n=4)	9290 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	9140 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8827 Points -3%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)	9725 Points +16%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	8469 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	8386 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	8253 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (7633 - 8386, n=4)	8106 Points -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	8028 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7749 Points -8%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)	11476 Points +126%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	9082 Points +79%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	8560 Points +69%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8240 Points +63%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (4747 - 7296, n=4)	6074 Points +20%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	5514 Points +9%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	5069 Points

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5539 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming (4166 - 6653, n=34, last 2 years)	5222 Points +12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	5217 Points +12%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	4780 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4666 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (4375 - 4666, n=3)	4569 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	4384 Points -6%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	6370 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	6317 Points -1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	6191 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (5682 - 6370, n=3)	6131 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (4622 - 7085, n=32, last 2 years)	6048 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5949 Points -7%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	5818 Points -9%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4666 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6370 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		5231 poäng
Hjälp

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	1030 μs * -127%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	453 μs *
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	364 μs * +20%

* ... smaller is better

	Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Lite-On CA5-8D512	MSI GS75 10SF-609US WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Alienware m17 R2 P41E 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		9%	18%	1%	4%	9%
Write 4K	120	119 -1%	177.9 48%	101.2 -16%	110.6 -8%	139.7 ?(76.2 - 229, n=36) 16%
Read 4K	45.24	51.9 15%	47.42 5%	44.61 -1%	41.46 -8%	49.9 ?(34.3 - 75.5, n=36) 10%
Write Seq	2090	2258 8%	2707 30%	2295 10%	2378 14%	2036 ?(776 - 2975, n=35) -3%
Read Seq	2246	2283 2%	2369 5%	2174 -3%	2114 -6%	2014 ?(973 - 2639, n=35) -10%
Write 4K Q32T1	392.5	491 25%	427.8 9%	401.2 2%	445.4 13%	461 ?(268 - 656, n=36) 17%
Read 4K Q32T1	348.4	540 55%	543 56%	475.5 36%	509 46%	499 ?(289 - 730, n=36) 43%
Write Seq Q32T1	3015	2253 -25%	2703 -10%	2397 -20%	2735 -9%	2903 ?(788 - 3033, n=36) -4%
Read Seq Q32T1	3445	3172 -8%	3387 -2%	3337 -3%	3206 -7%	3479 ?(2853 - 3568, n=36) 1%
AS SSD		-60%	-13%	9%	-27%	13%
Seq Read	2744	2019 -26%	2327 -15%	2800 2%	1938 -29%	2553 ?(1938 - 3148, n=37) -7%
Seq Write	1351	1314 -3%	2479 83%	2424 79%	2094 55%	2084 ?(1248 - 2837, n=37) 54%
4K Read	47.24	46.61 -1%	45.46 -4%	42.77 -9%	25.88 -45%	53.1 ?(44.3 - 68.4, n=37) 12%
4K Write	109.1	90.2 -17%	157.4 44%	94.8 -13%	100.8 -8%	131.2 ?(87.4 - 208, n=37) 20%
4K-64 Read	1118	665 -41%	1050 -6%	1406 26%	1217 9%	1477 ?(762 - 2093, n=37) 32%
4K-64 Write	1926	813 -58%	938 -51%	1697 -12%	1137 -41%	1805 ?(1074 - 2152, n=37) -6%
Access Time Read *	0.064	0.058 9%	0.076 -19%	0.05 22%	0.051 20%	0.04983 ?(0.032 - 0.087, n=36) 22%
Access Time Write *	0.034	0.167 -391%	0.071 -109%	0.039 -15%	0.107 -215%	0.04222 ?(0.017 - 0.128, n=37) -24%
Score Read	1439	913 -37%	1328 -8%	1729 20%	1437 0%	1786 ?(1078 - 2449, n=37) 24%
Score Write	2170	1034 -52%	1343 -38%	2034 -6%	1447 -33%	2144 ?(1471 - 2527, n=37) -1%
Score Total	4283	2392 -44%	3366 -21%	4630 8%	3624 -15%	4826 ?(3309 - 6095, n=37) 13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-26% / -31%	3% / -0%	5% / 6%	-12% / -14%	11% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3445 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3015 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 348.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 392.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2246 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2090 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.24 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 120 MB/s

Constant Performance Reads: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=233, last 2 years)	40513 Points +23%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	32995 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (26292 - 32995, n=10)	29663 Points -10%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	29220 Points -11%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	27694 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	27203 Points -18%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	24066 Points -27%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)	136246 Points +6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	134255 Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	128974 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (101976 - 140750, n=7)	126108 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	124815 Points -3%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	121539 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	114826 Points -11%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=237, last 2 years)	29469 Points +25%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	23649 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	22391 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (19655 - 23649, n=10)	21743 Points -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	21191 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	18877 Points -20%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	18517 Points -22%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=235, last 2 years)	12072 Points +36%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	8906 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	8479 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (7372 - 8979, n=11)	8210 Points -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	8065 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	7597 Points -15%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	7057 Points -21%

3DMark 11 Performance		25058 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		45467 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		19929 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		8883 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (74.3 - 96, n=11)	85.3 fps +3%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	82.6 (69^min) fps
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	81 (72^min - 91^max) fps -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	80.9 (75^min - 90^max) fps -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK	78 fps -6%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	67.5 (61^min - 75^max) fps -18%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=245, last 2 years)	102.2 fps +23%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	85.3 fps +3%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	83.7 fps +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	82.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (76.8 - 87.6, n=6)	82 fps -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	81.6 fps -1%

Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Gaming (30.9 - 244, n=239, last 2 years)	152.9 fps +23%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	135 (117.7^min) fps +9%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	133 (116^min) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (117.4 - 139, n=6)	126.6 fps +2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	126.4 (110.3^min) fps +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	124.2 (108^min) fps
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=240, last 2 years)	143.1 fps +22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	126 (108.2^min) fps +7%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	126 (109.8^min) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (115 - 128, n=6)	120 fps +2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	119.6 (103.2^min) fps +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	117.7 (102.5^min) fps

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (14 - 218, n=126, last 2 years)	126.3 fps +25%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	101 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (91 - 110, n=4)	101 fps 0%

Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	177.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (140 - 177.7, n=8)	155.7 fps -12%
Average of class Gaming (22.2 - 189.7, n=5, last 2 years)	130.7 fps -26%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=230, last 2 years)	111.6 fps +67%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (67 - 80.8, n=2)	73.9 fps +10%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	67 fps

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø83.3 (73-88)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)				82.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	146.6	135.8	124.2	117.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)			67
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	114	97.6	82.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)				101
Doom Eternal (2020)				177.7

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		32 / 35 / 43 dB(A)
Hög belastning		44 / 45 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


56 °C	57 °C	54 °C
49 °C	52 °C	46 °C
39 °C	38 °C	36 °C

Max: 57 °C
Medel: 47.4 °C


50 °C	50 °C	51 °C
49 °C	49 °C	50 °C
42 °C	43 °C	42 °C

Max: 51 °C
Medel: 47.3 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 54 °C | Rumstemperatur 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


28 °C	28 °C	28 °C
27 °C	28 °C	28 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Max: 28 °C
Medel: 27.6 °C


27 °C	27 °C	27 °C
28 °C	28 °C	28 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Max: 28 °C
Medel: 27.3 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 36 °C | Rumstemperatur 23 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


57 °C	59 °C	56 °C
51 °C	52 °C	46 °C
40 °C	39 °C	37 °C

Max: 59 °C
Medel: 48.6 °C


52 °C	54 °C	53 °C
51 °C	52 °C	51 °C
45 °C	46 °C	46 °C

Max: 54 °C
Medel: 50 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 57 °C | Rumstemperatur 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.6 / 2.2 Watt
Låg belastning	10 / 16 / 29 Watt
Hög belastning	143 / 205 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	MSI GS75 10SF-609US i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-25%	-26%	-18%	-75%	-3%	-10%
Idle Minimum *	10	19.6 -96%	19.2 -92%	15.7 -57%	24.7 -147%	12.9 ?(9 - 23, n=8) -29%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years) -38%
Idle Average *	16	21.7 -36%	22.4 -40%	26.3 -64%	35.9 -124%	17.3 ?(12.6 - 30, n=8) -8%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years) -20%
Idle Maximum *	29	36.1 -24%	34.7 -20%	28 3%	69.6 -140%	26.9 ?(15.8 - 42, n=8) 7%	27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years) 7%
Load Average *	143	115.6 19%	106.7 25%	136 5%	141.8 1%	123.9 ?(94.8 - 156, n=8) 13%	111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years) 22%
Witcher 3 ultra *	146	157 -8%	160.5 -10%	160 -10%	185.8 -27%
Load Maximum *	205	219.9 -7%	248.7 -21%	177 14%	235.4 -15%	205 ?(169 - 216, n=8) -0%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years) -22%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		3tim 28min
WiFi Websurfing		2tim 50min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		1tim 28min

	Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 76 Wh	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh	MSI GS75 10SF-609US i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh	Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh	Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		74%	132%	-1%	37%	92%
Reader / Idle	208		513 147%	229 10%	426 105%	546 ?(57 - 1290, n=85, last 2 years) 163%
WiFi v1.3	170	296 74%	295 74%	178 5%	290 71%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=183, last 2 years) 116%
Load	88		243 176%	73 -17%	31 -65%	84.7 ?(36 - 173, n=145, last 2 years) -4%

För

+ Väldigt bra spelprestanda

+ Smidig bilduppdatering även i det "tysta" läget

+ 300 Hz-skärm med tilltalande bild

+ Bra kylsystem

Emot

- Saknar kortläsare

- Saknar Gigabit LAN

- Liten styrplatta

Omdöme - En modern spellaptop med hög prestanda

Recension av Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS. Recensionsex från Asus Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Köper du Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS kommer du inte behöva oroa dig för hårdvarans prestanda på väldigt länge. Detta räcker helt och hållet för aktuella spel och de kan till och med spelas i det tystare "Quiet"-läget som gör att fläktarna inte längre låter som ett motorrum. I vårt tycke fungerar Asus kyllösning bra och vi påverkades inte av den resulterande tangentbordsplaceringen i vårt dagliga arbete. Men den lilla öppningen på höljets undersida när locket är öppnat skapar ett väldigt instabilt intryck, så vi skulle bara använda Zephyrus S17 på ett fast underlag.

Asus Zephyrus S17 har massor av prestanda som den dessutom kan upprätthålla under längre tidsperioder tack vare ett raffinerat kylsystem.

Men den som vill få ut mesta möjliga från sin Asus Zephyrus S17 kommer förr eller senare vilja använda "Turbo"-läget. I synnerhet lär prestandakraven vara högre för 4K eller VR-program än för de Full HD-spel vi testat här. Vi hade dock oroat oss mindre för konsekvent prestanda och mer för ljudnivån. När fläktarna sätter igång helt och hållet är det bara hörlurar som gäller. Men eftersom detta inte är något ovanligt för en spellaptop lämnar Asus Zephyrus S17 ändå ett totalt sett bra intryck.

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS - 2020-08-16 08/16/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Design

80 / 98 → 81%

Tangentbord

77%

Mus

69%

Anslutningar

61 / 80 → 76%

Vikt

59 / 10-66 → 88%

Batteri

51 / 95 → 54%

Skärm

87%

Spelprestanda

96%

Programprestanda

92%

Temperatur

75 / 95 → 79%

Ljudnivå

66 / 90 → 73%

Audio

89%

Medel

69%

82%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 510 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - Gigantisk men tunn spellaptop med 300 Hz-skärm (Sammanfattning)

Mike Wobker, 2020-08-20 (Update: 2020-08-20)

Test: Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - Gigantisk men tunn spellaptop med 300 Hz-skärm (Sammanfattning)

Storleksjämförelse

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Constant Performance Reads: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme - En modern spellaptop med hög prestanda

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare