Notebookcheck Logo

HP Omen Transcend 16 (2024) laptop recension: En RTX 4070-spelmaskin med en OLED-skärm

Kraftfull bild. Med Omen 16 kan köparna välja mellan den "normala" versionen och den så kallade Transcend-varianten, som i många avseenden knappast skiljer sig från varandra. Läs vår recension för att upptäcka hur 16-tums enheten klarar sig mot konkurrenterna.
HP Omen Transcend 16

Testmodellen Omen Transcend 16 - med ändelsen u1095ng - kan för närvarande köpas för strax under 3 000 USD. För detta pris får köparen en Core i9-14900HX i kombination med en GeForce RTX 4070 som tenderar att tillhöra mer mellanklassen och inte high-end-kategorin på grund av dess ganska magra 8 GB VRAM. Detta kompletteras med 32 GB DDR5-5600 RAM-minne (2x 16 GB SO-DIMM) och en 1 TB M.2 NVMe SSD. Höjdpunkten är den livfulla OLED-panelen som sägs ha 2 560 x 1 600 pixlar, 240 Hz, 400 cd/m² och 100 % DCI P3. Paketet avrundas med Windows 11 Home.

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng (Omen Transcend 16 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1980 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, 130 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 546.56, Optimus
Minne
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (both in use)
Skärm
16.00 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 189 PPI, ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, WQXGA, glansig: nej, HDR, 240 Hz
Moderkort
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Hårddisk
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, 1024 GB 
, NVMe SSD, one M.2 slot (in use)
Ljudkort
Intel Raptor Point-S PCH - HD Audio (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: Combo (Headset/Mic)
Nätverk
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 20 x 356 x 269
Batteri
97 Wh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webbkamera: 2 MP
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.0, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 230 W Power Supply, Hyper X Cloud II Core Wireless Gaming Headset, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.284 kg, Strömförsörjning: 790 g
Pris
3000 EUR
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Omen Transcend 16-konkurrenten finns i form av andra 16-tums spelare utrustade med GeForce RTX 4070 samt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 (Ultra 7 155H), Schenker Schenker XMG Core 16 L23 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) och Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (Ryzen 7 7745HX) som alla visas i vår jämförelseenhetstabell.

Eftersom chassit är mestadels identiskt med föregångaren som hade en Core i9-13900HX (se vår recension), kommer vi bara kortfattat att gå in på kategorierna hölje, funktioner och inmatningsenhet.

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.4 %
02/2024
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.9 %
08/2023
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
92.3 %
02/2024
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg16.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.2 %
10/2023
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg26.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
05/2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.8 mm16.00"2560x1600

Fall

Transcend 16 har en iögonfallande design och ur en visuell synvinkel är den imponerande smal (alla konkurrerande enheter är tjockare förutom Zephyrus G16). När det gäller stabiliteten levererar åtminstone basenheten en stabil prestanda. Däremot hade locket - som med så många andra enheter - behövt bättre vridstyvhet. Vid första anblicken har den matta ytan ett premiumutseende, men HP har mestadels bara använt plast. Inga klagomål kan göras när det gäller byggkvalitet. Tillverkaren förtjänar beröm för den generösa 180° öppningsvinkeln även om gångjärnen kunde vara starkare. När det gäller vikten, 2,3 kg, ligger enheten i mitten av paketet och detta gör 16-tumsskärmen varken särskilt lätt eller tung.

HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16

Storleksjämförelse

363.4 mm 260.4 mm 26.8 mm 2.5 kg358.4 mm 266.8 mm 26.1 mm 2.4 kg357 mm 269 mm 19.8 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 269 mm 20 mm 2.3 kg354 mm 246 mm 16.4 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Funktioner

Portvalet kan beskrivas som mycket modernt. Medan baksidan rymmer en RJ45-port (tyvärr inte 2,5 Gbit LAN), en HDMI 2.1-utgång och en USB 3.0-port (typ A), är vänster sida hem för två Thunderbolt 4-portar (inklusive Power Delivery) och ett ljuduttag. På höger sida finns endast en ensam USB 3.0-port (typ A). Köparna får nöja sig med ett Kensington-lås och en kortläsare.

Vänster sida: 2x Thunderbolt 4 (PD), 3,5 mm ljuduttag
Vänster sida: 2x Thunderbolt 4 (PD), 3,5 mm ljuduttag
Baksida: nätverksanslutning, RJ45 LAN, HDMI 2.1, USB-A 3.0
Baksida: nätverksanslutning, RJ45 LAN, HDMI 2.1, USB-A 3.0
Höger sida: USB-A 3.0
Höger sida: USB-A 3.0

Kommunikation

Wi-Fi-prestandan ligger på en hög nivå och med en sändningshastighet på nästan 1 400 Mbit/s och cirka 1 700 Mbit/s när det gäller att ta emot data (1 m avstånd från referensroutern) ligger prestandan någonstans mellan bra och mycket bra. I Wi-Fi 6E AX211 har HP installerat en uppdaterad trådlös Intel-modul.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1654 (1599min, 1600.16P1 - 1713max) MBit/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1494 (1257min - 1548max) MBit/s +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1170min - 1766max) MBit/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1411 (1327min - 1472max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=150, last 2 years)
1275 MBit/s -10%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1861, n=181)
1247 MBit/s -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1173 (839min - 1366max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1697 (849min - 1712max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1600 (1564min, 1564.87P1 - 1627max) MBit/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1583 (1176min - 1662max) MBit/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1438 (767min - 1513max) MBit/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=156, last 2 years)
1407 MBit/s -17%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=181)
1397 MBit/s -18%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1339 (1216min - 1449max) MBit/s -21%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (1327-1472)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1170-1766)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1654 (1599-1713)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1257-1548)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1174 (839-1366)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1668 (849-1712)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1216-1449)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1600 (1564-1627)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1582 (1176-1662)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1412 (767-1513)

Webbkamera

Vi har blandade känslor när det gäller webbkameran på 2 MP. Medan bildskärpan är över genomsnittet lämnar färgåtergivningen mycket att önska. Det som är bra är den manuella slutaren för integritet.

ColorChecker
13.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
2 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng: 11.02 ∆E min: 2.04 - max: 23.85 ∆E

Tillbehör

Vår testenhet levererades också med en mycket tunn 230-watts PSU samt ett HyperX-headset (Cloud II Core trådlöst).

Underhåll

När det gäller underhåll är Omen 16 inte särskilt komplicerad. Efter att ha tagit hand om sex, små, korsade skruvar kan basplattan lyftas från sin förankrade position med hjälp av ett platt verktyg. Inuti enheten är alla viktiga komponenter tillgängliga, vare sig det gäller RAM-banker, batteri, M.2-plats, fläktar eller den trådlösa modulen.

HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16

Garanti

Garantin gäller i 24 månader.

Inmatningsenheter

Tangentbord

Med sina transparenta WASD-tangenter har HP satsat på en viss gamer-look. Layouten är mycket unik och det tar till och med lite tid att vänja sig vid den. Tillverkaren har valt att inte installera en numerisk knappsats och har istället gett 16-tumsenheten separata, väl tilltagna piltangenter. Andra beslut (till exempel placeringen av strömknappen) är verkligen svåra att förstå sig på. Skrivupplevelsen är medioker och HP har varit tvungna att använda en mekanisk modell för att få bättre feedback. Fans av bakgrundsbelysta tangenter kan se fram emot flera färger.

HP Omen Transcend 16

Pekplatta

Med en storlek på ca 13,5 x 8,5 cm kan den behagligt stora pekplattan beskrivas som anspråkslös när det gäller precision, jämnhet och klickytor. På samma sätt är stödet för gester intuitivt.

Display

Åsikterna går isär när det gäller OLED-paneler. På den negativa sidan finns några problem med de mycket reflekterande ytorna (vilket kan göra det svårt att använda dem utomhus), skärmen flimrar på alla ljusstyrkor och problemet med potentiell inbränning.

393
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 395 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 391.8 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 98 %
Mitt på batteriet: 390 cd/m²
Kontrast: 19500:1 (Svärta: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.21
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.221
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00
HP Omen Transcend 16
AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16.00
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
BOE0AF0 (), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
-4%
0%
-20%
-18%
Display P3 Coverage
99.8
99.2
-1%
99.9
0%
68.3
-32%
70.4
-29%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
98.6
-1%
99.6
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
97
87.6
-10%
96.9
0%
69.6
-28%
72.6
-25%
Response Times
-8093%
222%
-4850%
-3925%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
26.4 ?(15, 11.4)
-13100%
0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11)
-10%
13.2 ?(6.1, 7.1)
-6500%
7 ?(3.2, 3.8)
-3400%
Response Time Black / White *
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
28.2 ?(21.6, 6.6)
-14000%
0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)
-25%
6.6 ?(2.5, 4.1)
-3200%
9.1 ?(4.9, 4.2)
-4450%
PWM Frequency
120 ?(100)
3506 ?(100)
2822%
960 ?(60)
700%
Screen
-47%
0%
-203%
-161%
Brightness middle
390
791.1
103%
416
7%
376
-4%
355.3
-9%
Brightness
392
800
104%
418
7%
358
-9%
340
-13%
Brightness Distribution
98
95
-3%
96
-2%
88
-10%
91
-7%
Black Level *
0.02
0.04
-100%
0.33
-1550%
0.32
-1500%
Contrast
19500
19778
1%
1139
-94%
1110
-94%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.94
4.37
-125%
1.6
18%
2.74
-41%
1.13
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.26
10.39
-144%
2.1
51%
6.78
-59%
2.78
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.21
1.04
75%
0.88
79%
0.32
92%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
6.5
-333%
2.7
-80%
3.57
-138%
1.4
7%
Gamma
2.221 99%
2.28 96%
2.16 102%
2.4 92%
2.24 98%
CCT
6395 102%
6000 108%
6331 103%
7246 90%
6372 102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2715% / -1647%
74% / 56%
-1691% / -828%
-1368% / -668%

* ... smaller is better

I gengäld får OLED-tekniken bra betyg med underbara svarta nivåer (nästan 0,0 cd/m²) vilket leder till ett utmärkt kontrastförhållande som IPS-paneler inte kommer i närheten av. Detsamma gäller för betraktningsvinkelns stabilitet.

CalMAN: gråskalor
CalMAN: gråskalor
CalMAN: färgmättnad
CalMAN: färgmättnad
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: gråskalor (kalibrerade)
CalMAN: gråskalor (kalibrerade)
CalMAN: färgmättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: färgmättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)

En ytterligare höjdpunkt är den rika färgrymden: 100 % DCI P3 och 97 % AdobeRGB är inte något man tar för givet i spelvärlden. Detsamma gäller för färgnoggrannheten, som var imponerande redan före kalibreringen.

HP Omen Transcend 16 vs sRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs sRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs DCI P3
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs DCI P3

De korta svarstiderna får också beröm: Klassiska IPS-paneler kan bara drömma om 0,2 ms. Föregångarens mini-LED-skärm var betydligt ljusstarkare (800 vs. 392 cd/m²) men också betydligt långsammare.

Solljus framifrån
Solljus framifrån
Subpixlar
Subpixlar
Betraktningsvinkel
Betraktningsvinkel

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.1 ms rise
↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.1 ms rise
↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

100 % ljusstyrka
100 % ljusstyrka
80 % ljusstyrka
80 % ljusstyrka
60 % ljusstyrka
60 % ljusstyrka
40 % ljusstyrka
40 % ljusstyrka
20 % ljusstyrka
20 % ljusstyrka
0 % ljusstyrka
0 % ljusstyrka

Prestanda

Prismässigt börjar Omen Transcend 16 på cirka 1 600 USD. Instegsvarianten är utrustad med en Core i7-13700HX, a GeForce RTX 406016 GB RAM-minne och en IPS-skärm med dålig upplösning. Vår granskningsmodell befinner sig mer i den övre änden av pris- och specifikationsskalan.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

Testförhållanden

Den förinstallerade spelhubbens prestandahantering är något svåråtkomlig. I den tillhörande menyn väntar tre energilägen och en värmehanterare. Eftersom prestandaläget - analogt med de flesta bärbara speldatorer - säkerställer både bättre prestanda men också oproportionerlig bullerproduktion, utfördes alla mätningar med det balanserade läget. Därför kan de fastställda värdena endast jämföras med föregångaren i begränsad utsträckning. Utöver detta var både den automatiska fläktkontrollen och den automatiska grafikomkopplingen aktiva.

Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) Eco Ausgegleichen Leistung
Buller 39 dB(A) 44 dB(A) 53 dB(A)
Prestanda 60 fps lås 114 fps 126 fps

Processor

Core i9-14900HX är nästan överdimensionerad jämfört med GPU-kraften och höljets tjocklek. Raptor Lake-seriens 10 nm-modell erbjuder 8 prestandakärnor med hyper threading och 16 effektivitetskärnor utan HT, vilket resulterar i totalt 32 trådar. I det balanserade läget når processorn bara sin potential i begränsad utsträckning. Det bästa exemplet är vår Cinebench-loop: Även om prestandan var relativt hög under de första körningarna, sjönk poängen ganska kraftigt efter en kort tid (men sedan låg den kvar på en konstant nivå). Sammantaget är det bara tillräckligt för att nå nivån på Ultra 7 155H (ROG Zephyrus G16) eller Ryzen 7 7840HS (Schenker XMG Core 16).

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

0210420630840105012601470168018902100231025202730294031503360357037803990Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2840 (2582.31-3904.72)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3989 (3846.15-4100.04)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2533 (2383.65-2679.17)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2657 (2635.57-2681.14)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX: Ø2918 (2861.03-2977.96)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
86.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 -2!
Intel Core i9-13900HX
80.1 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
75.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
66.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
64.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
62 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60.4 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (20702 - 32996, n=19)
29176 Points +41%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
25932 (23977.8min - 25931.6max) Points +25%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
20702 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)
19422 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
18060 (17729.5min - 18059.9max) Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17267 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
17205 Points -17%
Single Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2100 - 2235, n=19)
2184 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2182 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2105 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
1846 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)
1809 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1767 Points -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1681 Points -23%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8427 - 12419, n=19)
11095 Points +32%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
9895 Points +17%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8427 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)
7383 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
7072 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6682 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6656 Points -21%
CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
836 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (804 - 859, n=19)
835 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
805 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
717 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)
697 Points -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
693 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
686 Points -18%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 4875, n=19)
4436 Points +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4100 (3846.15min - 4100.04max) Points +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3905 (2582.31min - 3904.72max) Points
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3074 Points -21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
2978 (2861.03min - 2977.96max) Points -24%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2681 (2635.57min - 2681.14max) Points -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2679 (2383.65min - 2679.17max) Points -31%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (298 - 320, n=19)
309 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
299 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
298 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
294 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
270 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
264 Points -11%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)
201 Seconds * -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
193 Seconds * -18%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
186 Seconds * -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
174 Seconds * -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
164 Seconds *
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
123 Seconds * +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (102 - 164, n=19)
118.9 Seconds * +27%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (87555 - 127108, n=19)
112906 MIPS +28%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105001 MIPS +19%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
88012 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)
76641 MIPS -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
75557 MIPS -14%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
73035 MIPS -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68500 MIPS -22%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
7244 MIPS +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7142 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6206 - 7405, n=19)
7081 MIPS -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6866 MIPS -4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6632 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)
6113 MIPS -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5439 MIPS -24%
Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (15849 - 18643, n=19)
17573 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
16011 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 18291, n=70, last 2 years)
13958 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13323 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
13088 Points -18%
Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2800 - 3095, n=19)
2994 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2800 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2694 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1599 - 3095, n=70, last 2 years)
2639 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2410 Points -14%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 21606, n=19)
19389 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
19012 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17612 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)
13504 Points -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12905 Points -27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
12378 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
11803 Points -33%
Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2193, n=19)
2098 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2058 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2053 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
2040 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1951 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2193, n=231, last 2 years)
1805 Points -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1755 Points -15%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (22.7 - 34.4, n=19)
29.7 fps +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
26.2 fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
23.2 fps +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
22.7 fps
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
21.6 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)
21.1 fps -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.9 fps -12%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
68.1 s * -28%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
53.1 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.6 s * +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)
49.3 s * +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (33.9 - 85.1, n=19)
44.9 s * +15%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
43.8 s * +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
37.9 s * +29%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)
0.4706 sec * -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4654 sec * -18%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
0.4352 sec * -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
0.421 sec * -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.4028 sec * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3955 sec *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3609 - 0.4225, n=19)
0.3834 sec * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3905 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
270 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
298 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
95.8 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
72.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
65.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
29656 KRay/s +72%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
27731 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17244 - 29351, n=18)
25203 KRay/s +46%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
23600 KRay/s +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years)
18514 KRay/s +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
17244 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16431 KRay/s -5%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (88537 - 148888, n=18)
126027 Points +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120974 Points +37%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
118600 Points +34%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117390 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years)
93043 Points +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88537 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85461 Points -3%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (4267 - 7229, n=18)
6175 MB/s +45%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5888 MB/s +38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4974 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4920 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years)
4297 MB/s +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4267 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3814 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148773, n=18)
138641 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126954 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126217 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
118405 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years)
108858 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105028 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90347 Points -24%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15887 Points +30%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (12217 - 18256, n=18)
15337 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15189 Points +24%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13440 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12217 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years)
12143 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10641 Points -13%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64255 Points +48%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63114 Points +46%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43302 - 72594, n=18)
61653 Points +42%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58716 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years)
47650 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
43302 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41806 Points -3%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=18)
126380 MB/s +45%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111789 MB/s +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years)
106724 MB/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88619 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86964 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79475 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71191 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1265 - 2149, n=18)
1808 MB/s +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1689 MB/s +34%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1265 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years)
1202 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1147 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1128 MB/s -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1099 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15975 KRay/s +74%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14776 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (9170 - 16128, n=18)
13559 KRay/s +48%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12891 KRay/s +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years)
10025 KRay/s +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9170 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8449 KRay/s -8%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50609 MPixel/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49507 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49238 MPixel/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (33960 - 51118, n=18)
48364 MPixel/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39928 MPixel/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years)
36547 MPixel/s -26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
28499 MPixel/s -42%

Systemets prestanda

Systemprestandan gör en bra figur utan att vara bland de främsta. När det gäller RAM-hastigheten säkrar Transcend andraplatsen i jämförelsefältet.

PCMark 10 / Score
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7866 - 8550, n=4)
8207 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8206 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8183 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
8153 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
7866 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7573 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7123 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
11302 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11074 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10621 - 11286, n=4)
10984 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10934 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)
10708 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10621 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10038 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10526 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9701 - 11103, n=4)
10303 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10268 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10235 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
9735 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (7244 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)
9727 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9208 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
13370 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12114 - 14827, n=4)
13291 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13229 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
12920 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
12114 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)
11407 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10612 Points -12%
CrossMark / Overall
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2002 - 2312, n=3)
2208 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2027 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1970 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=167, last 2 years)
1876 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1721 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1694 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1827 - 2191, n=3)
2063 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1930 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1812 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=167, last 2 years)
1787 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1629 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1624 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2287 - 2458, n=3)
2399 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2316 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2222 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=167, last 2 years)
2040 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1942 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1862 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1769 - 2330, n=3)
2119 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1785 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=167, last 2 years)
1700 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1557 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1435 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1424 Points
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
345 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
342 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (322 - 342, n=4)
334 Points -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
331 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=193, last 2 years)
300 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
288 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
283 Points -17%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
300 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (291 - 298, n=2)
294 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
283 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=160, last 2 years)
262 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
256 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
548 ms * -25%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
533 ms * -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 824, n=208, last 2 years)
521 ms * -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
471 ms * -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
455 ms * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (436 - 449, n=4)
442 ms * -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7866 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89414 MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78330 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (56992 - 83392, n=18)
77554 MB/s -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77103 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67907 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years)
59056 MB/s -25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50007 MB/s -36%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86576 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85070 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84131 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (54443 - 86788, n=18)
83939 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years)
62916 MB/s -26%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
60730 MB/s -29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50703 MB/s -40%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84517 MB/s +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77579 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76244 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (51387 - 78199, n=18)
74797 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73337 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years)
61374 MB/s -21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54587 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
140 ns * -62%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.9 ns * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.8 ns * -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years)
87.2 ns * -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (79.7 - 105, n=18)
84.3 ns * +3%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-fördröjningar

Precis som föregångaren måste även nya Omen 16 kämpa med relativt höga latenser, vilket kan leda till problem i vissa tillämpningsscenarier (t.ex. bearbetning av ljud och video i realtid).

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2484.4 μs * -59%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1566 μs *
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1518 μs * +3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
673.1 μs * +57%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
603 μs * +61%

* ... smaller is better

Masslagring

Jämfört med CPU-prestandan observerade vi inga nedgångar i SSD-prestandan. Den installerade Kioxia-enheten är lite långsammare än SK hynix-enheten som finns i den gamla Transcend, men trots detta levererar den tillräckligt höga hastigheter. Det som är synd är att 16-tummaren bara har en M.2-plats och det betyder att den inbyggda SSD-enheten måste bytas ut för att utöka lagringsutrymmet.

Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6967 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5341 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 511.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 400.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3599 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3651 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.34 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.3 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
89.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
73.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
70.5 pt
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
 
69.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
66.2 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
61.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
48.5 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4677 (4664.17min - 4676.56max) MB/s +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (1291 - 7045, n=196, last 2 years)
3528 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3449 (3368.24min - 3448.79max) MB/s +11%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2735 - 4156, n=7)
3430 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3202 (3129.61min - 3201.93max) MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3102 (3080.64min - 3101.78max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3023 (3010.73min - 3023.25max) MB/s -3%
seq write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4326 (4313.21min - 4326.48max) MB/s +42%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (3038 - 4893, n=7)
4036 MB/s +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=196, last 2 years)
3808 MB/s +25%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3637 (3591.53min - 3636.88max) MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3152 (3026.22min - 3152.01max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3038 (2862.26min - 3038.15max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2526 (2498.97min - 2525.81max) MB/s -17%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7137 (6595.15min - 7137.45max) MB/s +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6899 (5306.42min - 6899.46max) MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6660 (6017.57min - 6659.93max) MB/s +4%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (6169 - 6985, n=7)
6562 MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
6388 (5544.27min - 6387.72max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1983 - 16089, n=196, last 2 years)
6357 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5008 (4421.01min - 5007.74max) MB/s -22%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6818 (6604.35min - 6817.63max) MB/s +30%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5716 (5661.68min - 5716.31max) MB/s +9%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (5234 - 5667, n=7)
5444 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5234 (5167.11min - 5234.47max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4943 (4926min - 4942.6max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=196, last 2 years)
4779 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3230 (3169.22min - 3230.03max) MB/s -38%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.1 (78.57min - 80.12max) MB/s +56%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=196, last 2 years)
67.6 MB/s +32%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
64.2 (63.05min - 64.22max) MB/s +25%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (51.3 - 69.6, n=7)
60.9 MB/s +19%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
56.3 (55.9min - 56.3max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
52.9 (51.15min - 52.91max) MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
51.3 (50.48min - 51.25max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
244 (243min - 243.65max) MB/s +90%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=196, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +75%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (116.4 - 219, n=7)
169.8 MB/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
146.3 (140.58min - 146.31max) MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
128.4 (126.56min - 128.36max) MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
128.1 (123.78min - 128.05max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
127 (124.67min - 127.01max) MB/s -1%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4173 (4166.98min - 4173.4max) MB/s +364%
Average of class Gaming
  (313 - 6172, n=196, last 2 years)
2576 MB/s +186%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (834 - 3829, n=7)
2172 MB/s +141%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1077 (1013.53min - 1077.14max) MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
932 (919.54min - 932.39max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
900 (832.36min - 900.34max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
604 (565.74min - 603.6max) MB/s -33%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3552 (3546.24min - 3551.63max) MB/s +711%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=196, last 2 years)
2147 MB/s +390%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (365 - 2682, n=7)
1389 MB/s +217%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
501 (456.23min - 501.33max) MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 (405.08min - 437.5max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
413 (372.31min - 412.68max) MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
402 (389.17min - 402.07max) MB/s -8%
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8963 Points +74%
Average of class Gaming
  (1923 - 13854, n=184, last 2 years)
6784 Points +32%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6291 Points +22%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (4465 - 8212, n=7)
6249 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6198 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5138 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3272 Points -36%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3449 Points +137%
Average of class Gaming
  (528 - 4721, n=184, last 2 years)
2489 Points +71%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (1359 - 3403, n=7)
2258 Points +55%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1603 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1523 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1458 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1020 Points -30%
Score Write