Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Poco M3 - En smartphone för 1.500 kronor (Sammanfattning)

Ett bra erbjudande för en liten budget. En smartphone för 1.500 kronor, fungerar det? I fallet Xiaomi Poco M3 fungerar det rätt så bra. För det priset får du en smartphone med Android 10, en IPS-skärm på 6.53 tum, en trippelkamera, en Snapdragon 662 samt stereoljud. Som en bonus får du också ett gigantiskt batteri på 6000 mAh. Priset inkluderar till och med ett skyddsfodral och skydd för skärmen.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
, , , , , ,
sökrelation
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Poco M Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Kryo 260
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Minne
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Skärm
6.53 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 395 PPI, Kapacitiv, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, FHD+, Solljus-läge, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107.5 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infraröd, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 512 GB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhetssensor, Accelerometer, Elektronisk kompass, Vibrationsmotor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (band 2/3/5/8), 3G (band B1/2/4/5/8), 4G (band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41), Huvud SAR 0,597 W/kg, Kropp SAR 0,807 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.6 x 162.3 x 77.3
Batteri
6000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (1/2" sensorstorlek, f/1.79, 6P lins, AF, 0.8μm pixelstorlek, 1.6μm 4-in-1 Super Pixel) + 2MP makrokamera (1.75μm pixelstorlek, f/2.4, FF) + 2MP djupsensor (1.75μm pixelstorlek, f/2.4), video i upp till [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 8MP (1.12μm pixelstorlek, f/2.05)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Dubbla högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare på 22.5 Watt, USB-C kabel, SIM-verktyg, Skyddshölje, Skärmskydd, Användarguide, Garantikort, MIUI 12, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
198 g, Strömförsörjning: 65 g
Pris
169 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78 %
01/2021
Xiaomi Poco M3
SD 662, Adreno 610
198 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.53"2340x1080
78 %
10/2020
Motorola Moto G9 Play
SD 662, Adreno 610
200 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
80 %
09/2020
realme 7
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
196.5 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80 %
04/2020
Samsung Galaxy M21
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
188 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2340x1080
75 %
10/2020
Sony Xperia L4
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
178 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.20"1680x720
80 %
09/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
199 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.53"2340x1080

Storleksjämförelse

165.2 mm 75.7 mm 9.2 mm 200 g162.3 mm 77.3 mm 9.6 mm 198 g162.3 mm 75.4 mm 9.4 mm 196.5 g162.3 mm 77.2 mm 8.9 mm 199 g159 mm 75.1 mm 8.9 mm 188 g159 mm 71 mm 8.7 mm 178 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=295, last 2 years)
403 MBit/s ∼100% +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
355 (327min - 366max) MBit/s ∼88% +18%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
332 (231min - 352max) MBit/s ∼82% +10%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
301 (209min - 341max) MBit/s ∼75%
realme 7
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 (252min - 311max) MBit/s ∼72% -4%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Adreno 610, SD 662, 64 GB eMMC Flash
239 (26min - 333max) MBit/s ∼59% -21%
Sony Xperia L4
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
120 (106min - 124max) MBit/s ∼30% -60%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=295, last 2 years)
390 MBit/s ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
347 (172min - 352max) MBit/s ∼89% +22%
realme 7
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (209min - 355max) MBit/s ∼88% +21%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
304 (285min - 323max) MBit/s ∼78% +7%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
284 (186min - 366max) MBit/s ∼73%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Adreno 610, SD 662, 64 GB eMMC Flash
237 (21min - 330max) MBit/s ∼61% -17%
Sony Xperia L4
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
109 (103min - 114max) MBit/s ∼28% -62%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360283338328252288338336281265339341255283331332268248337333313225333328292238327328319209320283338328252288338336281265339341255283331332268248337333313225333328292238327328319209320326296232265326314281225314324236270327330251241275366256239323292299186304326293192302309Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø300 (209-341)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø284 (186-366)
Xiaomi Poco M3: Fullständig rutt
Xiaomi Poco M3: Fullständig rutt
Xiaomi Poco M3: Sjö
Xiaomi Poco M3: Sjö
Xiaomi Poco M3: Vägskäl
Xiaomi Poco M3: Vägskäl
Garmin Edge 500: Fullständig rutt
Garmin Edge 500: Fullständig rutt
Garmin Edge 500: Sjö
Garmin Edge 500: Sjö
Garmin Edge 500: Vägskäl
Garmin Edge 500: Vägskäl

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 25-facher ZoomLowlight
click to load images
ColorChecker
30.2 ∆E
55.4 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
63.6 ∆E
55 ∆E
34.9 ∆E
44 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
67.1 ∆E
65.8 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
49.2 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
78.6 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
94.5 ∆E
71.9 ∆E
53 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M3: 47.74 ∆E min: 14.11 - max: 94.47 ∆E
ColorChecker
5.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M3: 5.6 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 8.92 ∆E
414
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 465 cd/m² Medel: 428 cd/m² Minimum: 2.35 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 465 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2214:1 (Svärta: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Xiaomi Poco M3
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Motorola Moto G9 Play
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
realme 7
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy M21
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40
Sony Xperia L4
IPS, 1680x720, 6.20
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
IPS LCD, 2340x1080, 6.53
Screen
-82%
-65%
9%
-87%
-9%
Brightness middle
465
450
-3%
525
13%
617
33%
429
-8%
553
19%
Brightness
428
428
0%
512
20%
614
43%
404
-6%
527
23%
Brightness Distribution
89
88
-1%
90
1%
95
7%
92
3%
89
0%
Black Level *
0.21
0.23
-10%
0.55
-162%
0.26
-24%
0.12
43%
Contrast
2214
1957
-12%
955
-57%
1650
-25%
4608
108%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.7
5.49
-223%
4.4
-159%
2.11
-24%
6.14
-261%
3.8
-124%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.5
10.19
-191%
6.75
-93%
3.41
3%
10.51
-200%
8.7
-149%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
7.5
-213%
4.3
-79%
2.6
-8%
6.6
-175%
2.2
8%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.495 88%
2.3 96%
2.073 106%
2.23 99%
2.3 96%
CCT
6664 98%
8711 75%
7472 87%
6921 94%
8346 78%
6727 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 892.9 Hz ≤ 3 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 892.9 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 3 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 892.9 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9672 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.4 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2257 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1565 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1198 Points ∼53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (345 - 376, n=5)
364 Points ∼16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=97, last 2 years)
2075 Points ∼92%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2121 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1208 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1179 Points ∼56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (442 - 498, n=4)
466 Points ∼22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=95, last 2 years)
1948 Points ∼92%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1275 Points ∼67%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1397 Points ∼73% +10%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
1622 Points ∼85% +27%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1322 Points ∼69% +4%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
883 Points ∼46% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1259 Points ∼66% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1256 - 1453, n=7)
1372 Points ∼72% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=200, last 2 years)
1912 Points ∼100% +50%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
316 Points ∼57%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
314 Points ∼57% -1%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
506 Points ∼92% +60%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
349 Points ∼63% +10%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
150 Points ∼27% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
356 Points ∼64% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (306 - 316, n=7)
313 Points ∼57% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=200, last 2 years)
553 Points ∼100% +75%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
6042 Points ∼62%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
6296 Points ∼64% +4%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
9797 Points ∼100% +62%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5892 Points ∼60% -2%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5251 Points ∼54% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
8698 Points ∼89% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (5866 - 6425, n=8)
6143 Points ∼63% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=269, last 2 years)
7692 Points ∼79% +27%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7247 Points ∼51%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
8610 Points ∼61% +19%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
14164 Points ∼100% +95%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6043 Points ∼43% -17%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6909 Points ∼49% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
11421 Points ∼81% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7247 - 8714, n=8)
7986 Points ∼56% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=246, last 2 years)
9824 Points ∼69% +36%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
369 Points ∼12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (366 - 369, n=3)
367 Points ∼12% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=60, last 2 years)
3079 Points ∼100% +734%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
369 Points ∼13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (369 - 385, n=5)
375 Points ∼13% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=63, last 2 years)
2783 Points ∼100% +654%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2124 Points ∼76%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2250 Points ∼80% +6%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2813 Points ∼100% +32%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2125 Points ∼76% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2124 - 2499, n=6)
2292 Points ∼81% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=208, last 2 years)
2646 Points ∼94% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
963 Points ∼32%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
974 Points ∼32% +1%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2788 Points ∼93% +190%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1439 Points ∼48% +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (963 - 1005, n=6)
980 Points ∼33% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (210 - 11259, n=208, last 2 years)
3002 Points ∼100% +212%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1096 Points ∼39%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1114 Points ∼40% +2%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2794 Points ∼100% +155%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1550 Points ∼55% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1096 - 1167, n=6)
1121 Points ∼40% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (262 - 6977, n=208, last 2 years)
2650 Points ∼95% +142%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2298 Points ∼72%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2399 Points ∼75% +4%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3213 Points ∼100% +40%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2260 Points ∼70% -2%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1102 Points ∼34% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2164 - 2534, n=6)
2367 Points ∼74% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=269, last 2 years)
2863 Points ∼89% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1032 Points ∼30%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1034 Points ∼31% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2682 Points ∼79% +160%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1532 Points ∼45% +48%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
467 Points ∼14% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (980 - 1081, n=6)
1035 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=269, last 2 years)
3386 Points ∼100% +228%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1176 Points ∼39%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1184 Points ∼39% +1%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2784 Points ∼91% +137%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1650 Points ∼54% +40%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
536 Points ∼18% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1124 - 1197, n=6)
1176 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=269, last 2 years)
3045 Points ∼100% +159%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2221 Points ∼68%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2384 Points ∼73% +7%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3249 Points ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1917 Points ∼59% -14%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1106 Points ∼34% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2146 - 2502, n=6)
2360 Points ∼73% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=267, last 2 years)
2821 Points ∼87% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1779 Points ∼38%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1786 Points ∼38% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3148 Points ∼67% +77%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1601 Points ∼34% -10%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
782 Points ∼17% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1768 - 1794, n=6)
1784 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=269, last 2 years)
4717 Points ∼100% +165%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1861 Points ∼50%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1891 Points ∼50% +2%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3170 Points ∼84% +70%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1662 Points ∼44% -11%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
836 Points ∼22% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1856 - 1914, n=6)
1889 Points ∼50% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=269, last 2 years)
3753 Points ∼100% +102%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2424 Points ∼74%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2499 Points ∼77% +3%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3261 Points ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2186 Points ∼67% -10%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1078 Points ∼33% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2351 - 2513, n=6)
2453 Points ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=260, last 2 years)
2753 Points ∼84% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1022 Points ∼37%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1022 Points ∼37% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2599 Points ∼93% +154%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1445 Points ∼52% +41%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
405 Points ∼15% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1022 - 1074, n=6)
1032 Points ∼37% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=260, last 2 years)
2785 Points ∼100% +173%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1173 Points ∼43%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1177 Points ∼43% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2722 Points ∼100% +132%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1563 Points ∼57% +33%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
470 Points ∼17% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1168 - 1905, n=6)
1297 Points ∼48% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=260, last 2 years)
2608 Points ∼96% +122%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2161 Points ∼67%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2444 Points ∼75% +13%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3247 Points ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2176 Points ∼67% +1%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1084 Points ∼33% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2161 - 2543, n=6)
2419 Points ∼74% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=260, last 2 years)
2716 Points ∼84% +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1715 Points ∼44%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1743 Points ∼44% +2%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3254 Points ∼83% +90%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2092 Points ∼53% +22%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
680 Points ∼17% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1715 - 1765, n=6)
1740 Points ∼44% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=260, last 2 years)
3919 Points ∼100% +129%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1797 Points ∼54%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1862 Points ∼56% +4%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3252 Points ∼98% +81%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2110 Points ∼63% +17%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
741 Points ∼22% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1797 - 1889, n=6)
1854 Points ∼56% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=260, last 2 years)
3323 Points ∼100% +85%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
19025 Points ∼83%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
18647 Points ∼82% -2%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
18136 Points ∼80% -5%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
19902 Points ∼87% +5%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
14930 Points ∼65% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (18647 - 19804, n=4)
19225 Points ∼84% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 59268, n=231, last 2 years)
22801 Points ∼100% +20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
23495 Points ∼42%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
23379 Points ∼42% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
36546 Points ∼66% +56%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25024 Points ∼45% +7%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11549 Points ∼21% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (23379 - 24043, n=4)
23648 Points ∼43% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=230, last 2 years)
55452 Points ∼100% +136%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
22329 Points ∼58%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
22131 Points ∼57% -1%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
29819 Points ∼77% +34%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23670 Points ∼61% +6%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
12161 Points ∼31% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (22131 - 22897, n=4)
22483 Points ∼58% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=230, last 2 years)
38643 Points ∼100% +73%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
35 fps ∼36%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
35 fps ∼36% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
81 fps ∼83% +131%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
35 fps ∼36% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (34 - 36, n=7)
35.1 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=219, last 2 years)
98 fps ∼100% +180%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
32 fps ∼60%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
29 fps ∼54% -9%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
45 fps ∼84% +41%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
31 fps ∼58% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (29 - 51, n=7)
39.4 fps ∼74% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=219, last 2 years)
53.3 fps ∼100% +67%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼33%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼33% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
52 fps ∼91% +174%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
18 fps ∼32% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (19 - 21, n=7)
19.4 fps ∼34% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=218, last 2 years)
57.1 fps ∼100% +201%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
17 fps ∼40%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
33 fps ∼79% +94%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
42 fps ∼100% +147%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
19 fps ∼45% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (17 - 34, n=7)
26.6 fps ∼63% +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=217, last 2 years)
41.7 fps ∼99% +145%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼33%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼33% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
33 fps ∼85% +154%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16 fps ∼41% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (13 - 14, n=7)
13.1 fps ∼34% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 117, n=215, last 2 years)
39 fps ∼100% +200%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼37%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
25 fps ∼77% +108%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
29 fps ∼89% +142%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼43% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (12 - 26, n=7)
19.9 fps ∼61% +66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=215, last 2 years)
32.6 fps ∼100% +172%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4.4 fps ∼32%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
9 fps ∼65% +105%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
12 fps ∼87% +173%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.6 fps ∼41% +27%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.1 fps ∼30% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4.4 - 9.6, n=7)
7.2 fps ∼52% +64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=271, last 2 years)
13.8 fps ∼100% +214%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼30%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼30% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
7.7 fps ∼81% +175%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼37% +25%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.4 fps ∼15% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2.6 - 2.9, n=7)
2.79 fps ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=270, last 2 years)
9.48 fps ∼100% +239%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7.5 fps ∼36%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼72% +100%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
19 fps ∼91% +153%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.2 fps ∼44% +23%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.4 fps ∼31% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7.5 - 15, n=7)
11.6 fps ∼56% +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 66, n=270, last 2 years)
20.8 fps ∼100% +177%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
8.3 fps ∼35%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
8.3 fps ∼35% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
21 fps ∼88% +153%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼42% +20%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.8 fps ∼16% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (8.3 - 8.6, n=7)
8.43 fps ∼35% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=270, last 2 years)
23.8 fps ∼100% +187%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼30%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7 fps ∼30% -1%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
19 fps ∼81% +168%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼43% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7 - 7.3, n=7)
7.19 fps ∼31% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=214, last 2 years)
23.5 fps ∼100% +231%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
6.4 fps ∼31%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼63% +103%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
17 fps ∼83% +166%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼43% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (6.4 - 14, n=7)
10.4 fps ∼51% +63%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 60, n=214, last 2 years)
20.5 fps ∼100% +220%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
183808 Points ∼55%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
177145 Points ∼53% -4%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
295778 Points ∼89% +61%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
180019 Points ∼54% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (167471 - 183808, n=7)
176368 Points ∼53% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=170, last 2 years)
331449 Points ∼100% +80%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4660 Points ∼10%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
12399 Points ∼25% +166%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4660 - 15830, n=5)
6904 Points ∼14% +48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 228879, n=42, last 2 years)
48873 Points ∼100% +949%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1098 Points ∼85%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1191 Points ∼92% +8%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
1288 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1200 Points ∼93% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1198 Points ∼93% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1034 - 1228, n=8)
1130 Points ∼88% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=204, last 2 years)
1225 Points ∼95% +12%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1847 Points ∼36%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1806 Points ∼35% -2%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3807 Points ∼74% +106%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2138 Points ∼41% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1845 Points ∼36% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1773 - 1887, n=8)
1846 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=204, last 2 years)
5170 Points ∼100% +180%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
3454 Points ∼87%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
3175 Points ∼80% -8%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3758 Points ∼94% +9%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1759 Points ∼44% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2536 Points ∼64% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2938 - 3454, n=8)
3118 Points ∼78% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=204, last 2 years)
3988 Points ∼100% +15%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4834 Points ∼77%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4911 Points ∼78% +2%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
5564 Points ∼88% +15%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4586 Points ∼73% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
5010 Points ∼79% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4275 - 5001, n=8)
4845 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=204, last 2 years)
6309 Points ∼100% +31%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2412 Points ∼71%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2406 Points ∼71% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3182 Points ∼93% +32%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2133 Points ∼63% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2285 Points ∼67% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2243 - 2432, n=8)
2357 Points ∼69% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=204, last 2 years)
3409 Points ∼100% +41%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)
47.8 Points ∼100% +49%
realme 7 (Chrome 86)
36.933 Points ∼77% +15%
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85)
32.433 Points ∼68% +1%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
32.041 Points ∼67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (30.4 - 32.4, n=8)
31.4 Points ∼66% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
30.642 Points ∼64% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
29.951 Points ∼63% -7%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=190, last 2 years)
85.5 Points ∼100% +73%
realme 7 (Chrome 86)
70.824 Points ∼83% +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
53.874 Points ∼63% +9%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
49.497 Points ∼58% 0%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
49.459 Points ∼58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (48.8 - 49.7, n=6)
49.4 Points ∼58% 0%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=162, last 2 years)
49.1 runs/min ∼100% +68%
realme 7 (Chome 86)
34.2 runs/min ∼70% +17%
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chome 85)
29.2 runs/min ∼59% 0%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
29.2 runs/min ∼59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (27.6 - 29.3, n=7)
28.6 runs/min ∼58% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
27 runs/min ∼55% -8%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chome 85)
26.6 runs/min ∼54% -9%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=203, last 2 years)
75.9 Points ∼100% +43%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
55 Points ∼72% +4%
realme 7 (Chrome 86)
55 Points ∼72% +4%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
53 Points ∼70%
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85)
52 Points ∼69% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (51 - 53, n=8)
51.9 Points ∼68% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
45 Points ∼59% -15%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=213, last 2 years)
16282 Points ∼100% +78%
realme 7 (Chrome 86)
15814 Points ∼97% +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
10299 Points ∼63% +13%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
9810 Points ∼60% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (8893 - 9879, n=8)
9348 Points ∼57% +2%
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85)
9264 Points ∼57% +2%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
9125 Points ∼56%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
4664.3 ms * ∼100% -3%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
4536.9 ms * ∼97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4444 - 4650, n=8)
4531 ms * ∼97% -0%
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85)
4443.5 ms * ∼95% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=215, last 2 years)
4424 ms * ∼95% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
3901.3 ms * ∼84% +14%
realme 7 (Chrome 86)
3380.6 ms * ∼72% +25%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Poco M3Motorola Moto G9 Playrealme 7Samsung Galaxy M21Sony Xperia L4Xiaomi Redmi Note 9Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-23%
-3%
-13%
-38%
-19%
14%
-2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
66.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
62.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
63.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
59.1 (49.6 - 64.2, n=3)
-8%
58.4 (1.7 - 83.3, n=193, last 2 years)
-9%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
84.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
77.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
84.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
82.3 (77.2 - 85.9, n=3)
-4%
76.2 (13.4 - 154, n=193, last 2 years)
-11%
Random Write 4KB
154.1
96.1
-38%
151.3
-2%
124.2
-19%
22.5
-85%
146.94
-5%
166 (127 - 207, n=5)
8%
109 (4.78 - 319, n=275, last 2 years)
-29%
Random Read 4KB
147.03
98.4
-33%
153.3
4%
126
-14%
61.2
-58%
65.13
-56%
155 (105 - 208, n=5)
5%
127 (13.5 - 325, n=275, last 2 years)
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB
269.2
187.2
-30%
200
-26%
192.7
-28%
165
-39%
248.14
-8%
397 (252 - 710, n=5)
47%
302 (11.9 - 1321, n=275, last 2 years)
12%
Sequential Read 256KB
509.23
315.2
-38%
529
4%
487.8
-4%
293.4
-42%
306.57
-40%
677 (503 - 949, n=5)
33%
710 (41.9 - 2037, n=275, last 2 years)
39%
05101520253035404550556037342840515459464951494850474651514951505052514644494441484850504948495053514845454148535859565558595753535655555245404549494543435045474546474755595856575754545349464643464750525359545254595346524542474648555143395860605960605955534947454038384442505153515257545151484844444348533734284051545946495149485047465151495150505251464449444148485050494849505351484545414853585956555859575353565555524540454949454343504547454647475559585657575454534946464346475052535954525459534652454247464855514339586060596060595553494745403838444250515351525754515148484444434853252624252525252525252525252525252425252521212625242525252525262425252624252526242425252525252225252525242524252525252525252525252524252524262525242425252425252525252425252523242624232625252426252525242522252525252524252525242524252525242625242525252425252525252425252525262425252525Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.56.8: Ø49.7 (28-60)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.1.0: Ø24.8 (21-26)
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco M3
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % ∼100%
Hög belastning
 34 °C33.7 °C34.8 °C 
 33.3 °C33.1 °C37.5 °C 
 33.2 °C31.3 °C33.3 °C 
Max: 37.5 °C
Medel: 33.8 °C
29.7 °C30.9 °C32.9 °C
30 °C31.3 °C32.8 °C
30 °C30.1 °C30.9 °C
Max: 32.9 °C
Medel: 31 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  27.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203839.72528.933.73123.8214025.323.35039336323.429.68019.317.610016.123.412510.53016015.346.420015452509.652.931512.45740010.164.450011.466.96301168.480014.570.9100010.968.5125013.572.8160010.873.3200011.475.825001275.4315012.575.340001375.3500013.173630013.668.6800013.471.21000013.572.71250013.967.81600014.755SPL24.885.1N0.662.4median 13median 68.5Delta1.69.838.941.436.838.333.135.132.935.235.337.328.728.119.121.820.421.620.519.317.227.314.237.314.545.814.550.812.85413.456.813.661.718.966.218.672.621.273.714.975.214.174.414.672.614.769.415.566.616.263.11766.81875.518.876.619.663.220.549.562.158.42983.814.110.61.154.2median 16.2median 63.22.512.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco M3Samsung Galaxy M21
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco M3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy M21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.08 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.5 / 1.84 / 1.87 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.99 / 6.01 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Poco M3
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M21
6000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
5020 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-47%
-18%
-48%
-26%
Idle Minimum *
0.5
1.2
-140%
0.74
-48%
0.836 (0.49 - 1.38, n=7)
-67%
0.926 (0.37 - 2.3, n=234, last 2 years)
-85%
Idle Average *
1.84
1.8
2%
2.17
-18%
2.72 (1.5 - 4.92, n=7)
-48%
1.851 (0.82 - 3.94, n=234, last 2 years)
-1%
Idle Maximum *
1.87
2.1
-12%
2.2
-18%
2.95 (1.8 - 4.95, n=7)
-58%
2.13 (0.85 - 4.2, n=234, last 2 years)
-14%
Load Average *
3.99
6.2
-55%
4.17
-5%
5.51 (3.57 - 7.21, n=7)
-38%
4.44 (2.1 - 8.4, n=234, last 2 years)
-11%
Load Maximum *
6.01
7.9
-31%
6.11
-2%
7.85 (6.01 - 9.32, n=7)
-31%
7.2 (3.16 - 12.3, n=234, last 2 years)
-20%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
45tim 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
20tim 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19tim 24min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
6tim 44min
Xiaomi Poco M3
6000 mAh
Motorola Moto G9 Play
5000 mAh
realme 7
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M21
6000 mAh
Sony Xperia L4
3580 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
5020 mAh
Battery Runtime
-23%
-19%
-6%
-37%
-19%
Reader / Idle
2756
2297
-17%
2294
-17%
H.264
1164
1352
16%
1116
-4%
WiFi v1.3
1249
962
-23%
1006
-19%
1298
4%
783
-37%
867
-31%
Load
404
289
-28%
314
-22%

För

+ Lätt och robust hölje
+ dual-SIM + microSD
+ LTE, Bluetooth 5.0, WiFi 5
+ Skyddsfodral och skärmskydd
+ Acceptabel kamera för dagsljus
+ Snabb fingeravtrycksläsare
+ Tillräcklig prestanda för vardagsuppgifter
+ Stereohögtalare
+ Riktigt lång batteritid

Emot

- Saknar NFC
- Känns ibland långsam
- IPS-skärmen är inte särskilt ljusstark
- Spel går bara att köra med vissa begränsningar

Omdöme - Mycket smartphone för 1.500 kronor

Recension av Xiaomi Poco M3. Recensionsex från Xiaomi Germany.
Recension av Xiaomi Poco M3. Recensionsex från Xiaomi Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Med ett pris på 1.500 kronor för versionen med 64 GB är Xiaomi Poco M3 riktigt billig. Till och med varianten med 128 GB är billig och kostar 1.700 kronor. Men med 4 GB RAM och en Snapdragon 662 är den inte direkt en prestandamästare och ibland kan responsen kännas seg. Prestandan räcker trots detta till för vardagsuppgifter och gör det till och med möjligt att spela ett och ett annat spel då och då. Vi hade däremot gärna sett en lite mer ljusstark IPS-skärm, för även om skärmen är bra i övrigt når den snabbt sin gräns utomhus.

Xiaomi Poco M3 har gedigen prestanda och får poäng för höjdpunkter som stereohögtalare och ett stort batteri på 6000 mAh.

Resten av hårdvaran är förvånansvärt utförlig. Den har ett trippelkamera-system som kan ta acceptabla bilder i dagsljus, riktigt stöd för dual-SIM och till och med stereohögtalare, vilket verkligen är sällsynt i den här prisklassen. Men den riktiga höjdpunkten är det stora batteriet på 6000 mAh som ger Xiaomis telefon väldigt lång batteritid. Batteriet kan laddas helt och hållet på under 3 timmar.

Sammanfattningsvis presterar Poco M3 bra, men det är inte den bästa billiga telefonen. Samsung Galaxy M21 är till exempel bättre och den kostar under 2.000 kronor. Samsung erbjuder också ett batteri på 6000 mAh men ger också en betydligt bättre skärm (AMOLED) och stöd för NFC. Däremot har Galaxy M21 inte stereohögtalare.

Xiaomi Poco M3 - 01/15/2021 v7
Manuel Masiero

Design
81%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
88%
Anslutningar
46 / 70 → 66%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
13 / 64 → 20%
Programprestanda
60 / 86 → 70%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
81 / 90 → 90%
Camera
51%
Medel
73%
78%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Mark Riege
Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 198 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Poco M3 - En smartphone för 1.500 kronor (Sammanfattning)
Manuel Masiero, 2021-01-21 (Update: 2021-01-21)