Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Xiaomi Poco M3 - En smartphone för 1.500 kronor (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78 % | 01/2021 | Xiaomi Poco M3 SD 662, Adreno 610 | 198 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.53" | 2340x1080 | |
| 77.9 % | 10/2020 | Motorola Moto G9 Play SD 662, Adreno 610 | 200 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 79.7 % | 09/2020 | Realme 7 Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4 | 196.5 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 79.7 % | 04/2020 | Samsung Galaxy M21 Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3 | 188 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2340x1080 | |
| 75.1 % | 10/2020 | Sony Xperia L4 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 178 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.20" | 1680x720 | |
| 79.9 % | 09/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 199 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.53" | 2340x1080 |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 25-facher ZoomLowlight
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 465 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2214:1 (Svärta: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
| Xiaomi Poco M3 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53 | Motorola Moto G9 Play IPS, 1600x720, 6.50 | Realme 7 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50 | Samsung Galaxy M21 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40 | Sony Xperia L4 IPS, 1680x720, 6.20 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 IPS LCD, 2340x1080, 6.53 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -82% | -65% | 9% | -87% | -9% | |
| Brightness middle | 465 | 450 -3% | 525 13% | 617 33% | 429 -8% | 553 19% |
| Brightness | 428 | 428 0% | 512 20% | 614 43% | 404 -6% | 527 23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -1% | 90 1% | 95 7% | 92 3% | 89 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.23 -10% | 0.55 -162% | 0.26 -24% | 0.12 43% | |
| Contrast | 2214 | 1957 -12% | 955 -57% | 1650 -25% | 4608 108% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 5.49 -223% | 4.4 -159% | 2.11 -24% | 6.14 -261% | 3.8 -124% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.5 | 10.19 -191% | 6.75 -93% | 3.41 3% | 10.51 -200% | 8.7 -149% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 7.5 -213% | 4.3 -79% | 2.6 -8% | 6.6 -175% | 2.2 8% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.495 88% | 2.3 96% | 2.073 106% | 2.23 99% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 6664 98% | 8711 75% | 7472 87% | 6921 94% | 8346 78% | 6727 97% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 893 Hz | ≤ 3 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 893 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 3 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 893 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
| Realme 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M21 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (16 - 34, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
| Realme 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M21 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (19 - 21, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
| Realme 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M21 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11 - 26, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
| Realme 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M21 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (13 - 14, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
| Realme 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy M21 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (167471 - 185542, n=9) | |
| AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
| Realme 7 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4660 - 15832, n=7) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Realme 7 (Chrome 86) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (30.4 - 32.4, n=10) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Realme 7 (Chrome 86) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (47.8 - 53.7, n=9) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years) | |
| Realme 7 (Chome 86) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (26.5 - 29.3, n=9) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chome 85) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85) | |
| Realme 7 (Chrome 86) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (51 - 59, n=11) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years) | |
| Realme 7 (Chrome 86) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (8893 - 10247, n=14) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (3779 - 4650, n=11) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85) | |
| Realme 7 (Chrome 86) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Poco M3 | Motorola Moto G9 Play | Realme 7 | Samsung Galaxy M21 | Sony Xperia L4 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -23% | -3% | -13% | -38% | -19% | 28% | 162% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 509 | 315.2 -38% | 529 4% | 487.8 -4% | 293.4 -42% | 306.6 -40% | 708 ? 39% | 1497 ? 194% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 269.2 | 187.2 -30% | 200 -26% | 192.7 -28% | 165 -39% | 248.1 -8% | 517 ? 92% | 1107 ? 311% |
| Random Read 4KB | 147 | 98.4 -33% | 153.3 4% | 126 -14% | 61.2 -58% | 65.1 -56% | 188 ? 28% | 246 ? 67% |
| Random Write 4KB | 154.1 | 96.1 -38% | 151.3 -2% | 124.2 -19% | 22.5 -85% | 146.9 -5% | 182.5 ? 18% | 270 ? 75% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 85.9 ? | 85.4 ? -1% | 84.6 ? -2% | 77.9 ? -9% | 83.5 ? -3% | 84.4 ? -2% | 82.3 ? -4% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64.2 ? | 65.3 ? 2% | 66.3 ? 3% | 62.2 ? -3% | 62.5 ? -3% | 63.5 ? -1% | 59.1 ? -8% |
| 3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Poco M3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy M21 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.08 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.5 / 1.84 / 1.87 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
3.99 / 6.01 Watt |
    
| |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M21 6000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5020 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -47% | -18% | -39% | -24% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.5 | 1.2 -140% | 0.74 -48% | 0.846 ? -69% | 0.897 ? -79% |
| Idle Average * | 1.84 | 1.8 2% | 2.17 -18% | 2.51 ? -36% | 1.452 ? 21% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.87 | 2.1 -12% | 2.2 -18% | 2.72 ? -45% | 1.629 ? 13% |
| Load Average * | 3.99 | 6.2 -55% | 4.17 -5% | 4.99 ? -25% | 5.55 ? -39% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.01 | 7.9 -31% | 6.11 -2% | 7.16 ? -19% | 8.31 ? -38% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Poco M3 6000 mAh | Motorola Moto G9 Play 5000 mAh | Realme 7 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M21 6000 mAh | Sony Xperia L4 3580 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5020 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -23% | -19% | -6% | -37% | -19% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2756 | 2297 -17% | 2294 -17% | |||
| H.264 | 1164 | 1352 16% | 1116 -4% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 1249 | 962 -23% | 1006 -19% | 1298 4% | 783 -37% | 867 -31% |
| Load | 404 | 289 -28% | 314 -22% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Mycket smartphone för 1.500 kronor
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Med ett pris på 1.500 kronor för versionen med 64 GB är Xiaomi Poco M3 riktigt billig. Till och med varianten med 128 GB är billig och kostar 1.700 kronor. Men med 4 GB RAM och en Snapdragon 662 är den inte direkt en prestandamästare och ibland kan responsen kännas seg. Prestandan räcker trots detta till för vardagsuppgifter och gör det till och med möjligt att spela ett och ett annat spel då och då. Vi hade däremot gärna sett en lite mer ljusstark IPS-skärm, för även om skärmen är bra i övrigt når den snabbt sin gräns utomhus.
Xiaomi Poco M3 har gedigen prestanda och får poäng för höjdpunkter som stereohögtalare och ett stort batteri på 6000 mAh.
Resten av hårdvaran är förvånansvärt utförlig. Den har ett trippelkamera-system som kan ta acceptabla bilder i dagsljus, riktigt stöd för dual-SIM och till och med stereohögtalare, vilket verkligen är sällsynt i den här prisklassen. Men den riktiga höjdpunkten är det stora batteriet på 6000 mAh som ger Xiaomis telefon väldigt lång batteritid. Batteriet kan laddas helt och hållet på under 3 timmar.
Sammanfattningsvis presterar Poco M3 bra, men det är inte den bästa billiga telefonen. Samsung Galaxy M21 är till exempel bättre och den kostar under 2.000 kronor. Samsung erbjuder också ett batteri på 6000 mAh men ger också en betydligt bättre skärm (AMOLED) och stöd för NFC. Däremot har Galaxy M21 inte stereohögtalare.
Xiaomi Poco M3
-
01/15/2021 v7
Manuel Masiero
Pricecompare
