Notebookcheck

Test: Motorola Moto G9 Play - Billig prestanda (Sammanfattning)

Åter i matchen. Med sin Moto G9 Play kommer Motorola med en ny utgåva av sin billiga mittenskiktstelefon och återvänder till sin traditionella namngivning. Ett stort batteri och en trippelkamera ska få Moto G9 Play att stå ut från sina konkurrenter. Låt oss se om det fungerar.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Moto G9 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Kryo 260
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.50 tum 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixlar 270 PPI, Kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 49 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 512 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerationssensor, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5, GSM, UMTS, LTE (Band 1/2/3/5/7/8/18/19/20/26/28/38/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.2 x 165.2 x 75.7
Batteri
5000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/1.7, fasjämförande AF, LED-blixt, video @1080p/60fps (kamera 1); 2.0MP, f/2.4, makrolins (kamera 2); 2.0MP, f/2.4, skärpedjup (kamera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.2, Video @1080p/​30fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på undre kanten, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Snabbladdare, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: 0.63 W/kg (Huvud), 1.37 W/kg (Kropp); LTE Cat.4 (150 MBit/s) Nerladdning, Cat. 5 (50 MBit/s) Uppladdning; FM-radio; IP52-certifierad, fanless
Vikt
200 g, Strömförsörjning: 76 g
Pris
169 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Bewertung
Rating Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
78 %7
10/2020
Motorola Moto G9 Play
SD 662, Adreno 610
200 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
80 %7
09/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
199 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.53"2340x1080
76 %7
06/2020
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2
192 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
75 %7
10/2020
Sony Xperia L4
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
178 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.20"1680x720
75 %7
10/2020
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320
200 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720

Storleksjämförelse

165.2 mm 75.7 mm 9.2 mm 200 g164.9 mm 75.8 mm 9.2 mm 200 g163.7 mm 75.3 mm 8.9 mm 192 g162.3 mm 77.2 mm 8.9 mm 199 g159 mm 71 mm 8.7 mm 178 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
355 (327min - 366max) MBit/s ∼100% +49%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
326 (280min - 333max) MBit/s ∼92% +36%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
239 (26min - 333max) MBit/s ∼67%
Sony Xperia L4
802.11 b/g/n
120 (106min - 124max) MBit/s ∼34% -50%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
802.11 b/g/n
74.2 (62min - 73max) MBit/s ∼21% -69%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
347 (172min - 352max) MBit/s ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
310 (269min - 342max) MBit/s ∼89% +31%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
237 (21min - 330max) MBit/s ∼68%
Sony Xperia L4
802.11 b/g/n
109 (103min - 114max) MBit/s ∼31% -54%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
802.11 b/g/n
62.8 (19min - 99max) MBit/s ∼18% -74%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø239 (26-333)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø237 (21-330)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptobjektiv BlumeHauptobjektiv UmgebungHauptobjektiv Low Light
ColorChecker
13 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G9 Play: 16.71 ∆E min: 4.6 - max: 25.37 ∆E
ColorChecker
18.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
10 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
7 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G9 Play: 8.39 ∆E min: 1.61 - max: 18.14 ∆E
406
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 460 cd/m² Medel: 427.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 450 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1957:1 (Svärta: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.49 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 7.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.495
Motorola Moto G9 Play
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
IPS LCD, 2340x1080, 6.53
Samsung Galaxy A21s
PLS, 1600x720, 6.50
Sony Xperia L4
IPS, 1680x720, 6.20
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Response Times
25%
22%
-6%
-15%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
52 (27, 25)
38.8 (19.6, 19.2)
25%
44 (19, 25)
15%
58 (33, 25)
-12%
70.4 (29.2, 41.2)
-35%
Response Time Black / White *
34 (17, 17)
25.6 (12.4, 13.2)
25%
24 (13, 11)
29%
34 (19, 15)
-0%
32.4 (13.2, 19.2)
5%
PWM Frequency
500 (10)
100 (15)
Screen
43%
-7%
-5%
-19%
Brightness middle
450
553
23%
540
20%
429
-5%
493
10%
Brightness
428
527
23%
509
19%
404
-6%
462
8%
Brightness Distribution
88
89
1%
91
3%
92
5%
91
3%
Black Level *
0.23
0.12
48%
0.36
-57%
0.26
-13%
0.47
-104%
Contrast
1957
4608
135%
1500
-23%
1650
-16%
1049
-46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.49
3.8
31%
6.58
-20%
6.14
-12%
5.7
-4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.19
8.7
15%
11.55
-13%
10.51
-3%
12.8
-26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.5
2.2
71%
6.4
15%
6.6
12%
6.8
9%
Gamma
2.495 88%
2.3 96%
2.206 100%
2.23 99%
2.31 95%
CCT
8711 75%
6727 97%
8482 77%
8346 78%
7596 86%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
34% / 40%
8% / -1%
-6% / -5%
-17% / -18%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9604 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1397 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1259 Points ∼64% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1081 Points ∼55% -23%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
883 Points ∼45% -37%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
902 Points ∼46% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1381 - 1397, n=2)
1389 Points ∼71% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 4160, n=144)
1963 Points ∼100% +41%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
314 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
356 Points ∼63% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
182 Points ∼32% -42%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
150 Points ∼27% -52%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
173 Points ∼31% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (314 - 316, n=2)
315 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1604, n=144)
566 Points ∼100% +80%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
6296 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
8698 Points ∼100% +38%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
5457 Points ∼63% -13%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5251 Points ∼60% -17%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5325 Points ∼61% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (6193 - 6296, n=2)
6245 Points ∼72% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=544)
6033 Points ∼69% -4%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
8610 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
11421 Points ∼100% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
7113 Points ∼62% -17%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6909 Points ∼60% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (8036 - 8610, n=2)
8323 Points ∼73% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=700)
6633 Points ∼58% -23%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2399 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2168 Points ∼89% -10%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1102 Points ∼45% -54%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1193 Points ∼49% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2399 - 2471, n=2)
2435 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=550)
2262 Points ∼93% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1034 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
784 Points ∼35% -24%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
467 Points ∼21% -55%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
466 Points ∼21% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1034 - 1043, n=2)
1039 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=550)
2242 Points ∼100% +117%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1184 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
914 Points ∼44% -23%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
536 Points ∼26% -55%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
539 Points ∼26% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1184 - 1197, n=2)
1191 Points ∼57% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=551)
2078 Points ∼100% +76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2384 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2190 Points ∼90% -8%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1106 Points ∼46% -54%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1191 Points ∼49% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2384 - 2466, n=2)
2425 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=582)
2177 Points ∼90% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1786 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1157 Points ∼38% -35%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
782 Points ∼26% -56%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
764 Points ∼25% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1786 - 1790, n=2)
1788 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 21465, n=582)
3047 Points ∼100% +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1891 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1292 Points ∼51% -32%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
836 Points ∼33% -56%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
830 Points ∼33% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1891 - 1906, n=2)
1899 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=582)
2523 Points ∼100% +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2499 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2037 Points ∼82% -18%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1078 Points ∼43% -57%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1134 Points ∼45% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2497 - 2499, n=2)
2498 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5262, n=631)
2138 Points ∼86% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1022 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
788 Points ∼42% -23%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
405 Points ∼22% -60%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
418 Points ∼22% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1022 - 1022, n=2)
1022 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=631)
1883 Points ∼100% +84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1177 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
912 Points ∼51% -23%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
470 Points ∼26% -60%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
486 Points ∼27% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1176 - 1177, n=2)
1177 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=632)
1784 Points ∼100% +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2444 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2034 Points ∼82% -17%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1084 Points ∼44% -56%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1140 Points ∼46% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2444 - 2517, n=2)
2481 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=673)
2008 Points ∼81% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1743 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1157 Points ∼46% -34%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
680 Points ∼27% -61%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
675 Points ∼27% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1729 - 1743, n=2)
1736 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=672)
2494 Points ∼100% +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1862 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1280 Points ∼60% -31%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
741 Points ∼35% -60%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
742 Points ∼35% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1858 - 1862, n=2)
1860 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=675)
2130 Points ∼100% +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
18647 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
18816 Points ∼99% +1%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
14930 Points ∼78% -20%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
16978 Points ∼89% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (18647 - 19422, n=2)
19035 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=817)
15777 Points ∼83% -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
23379 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
16301 Points ∼58% -30%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11549 Points ∼41% -51%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
11217 Points ∼40% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (23379 - 23675, n=2)
23527 Points ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 221179, n=815)
28199 Points ∼100% +21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
22131 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
16800 Points ∼75% -24%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
12161 Points ∼54% -45%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
12132 Points ∼54% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (22131 - 22576, n=2)
22354 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=815)
21747 Points ∼97% -2%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
9 fps ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
7.2 fps ∼62% -20%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.1 fps ∼35% -54%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.2 fps ∼36% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4.6 - 9, n=2)
6.8 fps ∼59% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=342)
11.6 fps ∼100% +29%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2.2 fps ∼27% -21%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.4 fps ∼17% -50%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.4 fps ∼17% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2.8 - 2.9, n=2)
2.85 fps ∼35% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=340)
8.2 fps ∼100% +193%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
12 fps ∼69% -20%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.4 fps ∼37% -57%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
6.7 fps ∼39% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7.8 - 15, n=2)
11.4 fps ∼66% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=346)
17.4 fps ∼100% +16%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
8.3 fps ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
6.2 fps ∼31% -25%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.8 fps ∼19% -54%
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
3.8 fps ∼19% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (8.3 - 8.4, n=2)
8.35 fps ∼42% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=345)
20 fps ∼100% +141%
Motorola Moto G9 PlayXiaomi Redmi Note 9Samsung Galaxy A21sSony Xperia L4Motorola Moto G8 Power LiteAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
8%
-13%
-23%
-18%
-26%
-25%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
66.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
62.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
63.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
58 (11.2 - 74.7, n=131)
-11%
51.4 (1.7 - 87.1, n=549)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
80 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
83.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
77.1 (21.1 - 87.2, n=131)
-10%
69.4 (8.1 - 96.5, n=549)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
96.1
146.94
53%
89.5
-7%
22.5
-77%
24.17
-75%
28.1 (3.4 - 147, n=150)
-71%
38.5 (0.14 - 319, n=912)
-60%
Random Read 4KB
98.4
65.13
-34%
77.2
-22%
61.2
-38%
59.92
-39%
56.5 (11.4 - 149, n=150)
-43%
61.6 (1.59 - 325, n=912)
-37%
Sequential Write 256KB
187.2
248.14
33%
104.3
-44%
165
-12%
226.46
21%
176 (40 - 254, n=150)
-6%
135 (2.99 - 1321, n=912)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB
315.2
306.57
-3%
307
-3%
293.4
-7%
283.98
-10%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=150)
-13%
355 (12.1 - 2037, n=912)
13%
Hög belastning
 39.5 °C36.7 °C36.2 °C 
 38.9 °C37 °C36.8 °C 
 38.1 °C36.8 °C36.4 °C 
Max: 39.5 °C
Medel: 37.4 °C
36 °C38.8 °C39 °C
35.5 °C38.6 °C36.2 °C
35.4 °C38.7 °C38 °C
Max: 39 °C
Medel: 37.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  39.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.443.32541.941.93138.529.94042.232.85043.734.26337.430.28029.622.110026.621.712532.420.716027.531.820019.342.325019.34931519.354.740019.457.150020.261.763022.965.980022.167.4100022.372.4125023.171.3160020.973.3200020.872.9250021.869.1315022.966.5400023.764.950002571.5630025.274.1800026.268.9100002866.51250027.870.21600028.355.8SPL73.975.735.982.5N2936.42.452.6median 22.9median 66.5Delta3.110.239.738.937.336.229.230.932.430.83237.323.624.521.72021.923.322.523.918.528.614.837.112.343.112.550.611.956.113.159.114.561.918.762.219.36718.269.216.46914.368.714.96814.664.715.466.316.165.116.769.717.772.818.664.819.450.320.352.763.728.779.518.1144.9median 16.4median 62.22.311hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G9 PlaySamsung Galaxy A21s
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G9 Play audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A21s audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto G9 Play
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
5020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A21s
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia L4
3580 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite
5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
962
867
-10%
943
-2%
783
-19%
833
-13%
704 (223 - 2636, n=778)
-27%
Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16tim 02min

För

+ Mycket kraftfull
+ Bra batteritid
+ Runt högtalarljud
+ NFC

Emot

- WLAN-hastigheterna varierar
- Ingen vidvinkelslins
- Till viss del oskarpa foton

Omdöme - Hög prestanda och lång batteritid

Recension av Motorola Moto G9 Play. Recensionsex från Motorola Germany.
Recension av Motorola Moto G9 Play. Recensionsex från Motorola Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Med sin Moto G9 Play levererar Motorola en billig smartphone med lång batteritid. Jämfört med Moto G8 Power Lite rör det sig om en betydande uppdatering, både i fråga om kommunikationsmoduler och prestanda. Det är därför värt att betala lite mer för den nya enheten. 

På de flesta områdena är Moto G9 Play ganska konkurrenskraftig jämfört med andra enheter för samma pris: Oavsett om det rör sig om processorns och grafikkortets prestanda, hantverkets kvalitet eller den bra högtalaren. Men kamerasystemet är inte lika flexibelt som på andra enheter och tar ibland suddiga foton. Skärmen kunde varit ännu mer ljusstark och dessutom visat färgerna lite mer exakt. Telefonen blir däremot inte särskilt varm vid belastning och skärmen klarar sig utan PWM för att minska ljusstyrkan.

Motorola Moto G9 Play är en framgångsrik och billig smartphone som har hög prestanda och god uthållighet, men däremot inte en särskilt bra kamera.

Du får inte lägga för stor vikt vid kameran om du väljer Moto G9 Play, men i övrigt kan vi rekommendera denna billiga mittenskiktstelefon.

Motorola Moto G9 Play - 10/09/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design
80%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
95%
Anslutningar
46 / 70 → 65%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
83%
Spelprestanda
13 / 64 → 20%
Programprestanda
62 / 86 → 72%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
55%
Medel
72%
78%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Motorola Moto G9 Play - Billig prestanda (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2020-10-14 (Update: 2020-10-14)