Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro) - Inte ytterligare en Mi 9 med uppfällbar kamera

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 08/18/2019

Slår inte Xiaomi Mi 9. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro har likt sin systermodell Mi 9T en motordriven uppfällbar framåtriktad kamera som syftar till att uppnå största möjliga skärm i förhållande till enhetens kropp. Den kommer också med en Snapdragon 855, 8 GB RAM och 128 GB UFS 2.1-lagring, men Xiaomi har gjort en del nedskärningar som hindrar den från att utmana Mi 9. Läs vidare för att få reda på hur Mi 9T Pro, eller borde vi säga Redmi K20 Pro, presterar i våra tester och för att få reda på hur den står sig mot Mi 9.

Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Mi Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Minne
8192 MB 
Skärm
6.39 tum 19,5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 403 PPI, Kapacitiv multitouch, AMOLED, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, avståndsmätare, elektronisk kompass, gyroskop, OTG, Miracast, Dual-VoLTE
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 4G/FDD/LTE: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8. 3G/WCDMA: 850, 1,900, 2,100 MHz. 2G/GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.8 x 156.7 x 74.3
Batteri
4000 mAh Litiumpolymer, Qualcomm Quick Charge 4+ och 27 W Turboladdning
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix Sony IMX586, f/1.75. 8 MP teleobjektiv, f/2.4. 13 MP vidvinkelslins, f/2.4. Camera2 API Level: 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix uppfällbar kamera, f/2.2, 0.8 μm
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på enhetens undersida, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddningskabel, Laddare på 18 W, silikonfodral, MIUI, 12 Månader Garanti, Widevine Level L3, fanless
Vikt
191 g, Strömförsörjning: 41 g
Pris
410 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro)
Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro)
Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro)
Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro)
Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro)
Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro)
Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro)
Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro)
Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro)
Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro)
Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro)
Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro)
Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro)

Storleksjämförelse

165.2 mm 76.5 mm 9.3 mm 220 g159.1 mm 75.44 mm 9.2 mm 190 g160.1 mm 76.1 mm 8.2 mm 167 g157.7 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 182 g156.7 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 191 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g155.3 mm 76.6 mm 7.99 mm 181 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +77%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
668 (min: 617, max: 692) MBit/s ∼99% +74%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
578 (min: 474, max: 617) MBit/s ∼85% +51%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
447 (min: 201, max: 659) MBit/s ∼66% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
428 (min: 360, max: 501) MBit/s ∼63% +12%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
388 (min: 361, max: 421) MBit/s ∼57% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
383 (min: 242, max: 434) MBit/s ∼56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=423)
224 MBit/s ∼33% -42%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
580 (min: 548, max: 602) MBit/s ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼92% +37%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
523 (min: 410, max: 563) MBit/s ∼90% +34%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
502 (min: 465, max: 517) MBit/s ∼87% +29%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
389 (min: 366, max: 444) MBit/s ∼67%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
330 (min: 232, max: 365) MBit/s ∼57% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (min: 249, max: 327) MBit/s ∼49% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=423)
214 MBit/s ∼37% -45%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø382 (242-434)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø389 (366-444)
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520: Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520: Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro - Bro
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro - Bro
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro – Slinga
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro – Slinga
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro - Översikt
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro - Översikt
Foto taget med Sony IMX586
Foto taget med Sony IMX586
2x zoom
2x zoom
Ultravidvinkelsfoto
Ultravidvinkelsfoto
Porträttläge
Porträttläge
Inställningar för Kamera-appen
Inställningar för Kamera-appen
Inställningar i det automatiska läget
Inställningar i det automatiska läget
Proffsläget
Proffsläget
Automatiskt läge
Automatiskt läge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Foto av vår testkarta
Foto av vår testkarta
Testkartan i detalj
589
cd/m²
604
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
584
cd/m²
594
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
607
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 639 cd/m² Medel: 606.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 594 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.51 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
142.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.219
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
OnePlus 7
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.4
Google Pixel 3a XL
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Samsung Galaxy A80
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
LG G8s ThinQ
P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Screen
23%
-35%
-50%
7%
-44%
-36%
Brightness middle
594
593
0%
603
2%
569
-4%
409
-31%
478
-20%
539
-9%
Brightness
607
587
-3%
605
0%
537
-12%
410
-32%
486
-20%
556
-8%
Brightness Distribution
91
94
3%
94
3%
79
-13%
96
5%
96
5%
88
-3%
Black Level *
0.31
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.51
0.9
40%
3.5
-132%
3.5
-132%
1.3
14%
2.97
-97%
3.78
-150%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.27
2
53%
7.7
-80%
6
-41%
2.3
46%
10.18
-138%
6.95
-63%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.6
1.5
42%
2.7
-4%
5.1
-96%
1.5
42%
2.5
4%
2.2
15%
Gamma
2.219 99%
2.27 97%
2.266 97%
2.36 93%
2.22 99%
2.031 108%
2.274 97%
CCT
6390 102%
6548 99%
6775 96%
6827 95%
6621 98%
6533 99%
6013 108%
Contrast
1835

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 223 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 223 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 223 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9394 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.8 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7372 Points ∼94%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7703 Points ∼98%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
6479 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7881 Points ∼100%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7442 Points ∼94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7372 - 8024, n=10)
7597 Points ∼96%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=317)
4676 Points ∼59%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10976 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼97% 0%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11388 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10878 Points ∼96% -1%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5172 Points ∼45% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6826 Points ∼60% -38%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10274 Points ∼90% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10187 - 11388, n=12)
10936 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=376)
4682 Points ∼41% -57%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3429 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼100% +3%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3510 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3444 Points ∼98% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1616 Points ∼46% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2436 Points ∼69% -29%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3406 Points ∼97% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3406 - 3537, n=12)
3482 Points ∼99% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=376)
1413 Points ∼40% -59%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9296 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼92% -3%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9205 Points ∼94% -1%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9814 Points ∼100% +6%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7377 Points ∼75% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7177 Points ∼73% -23%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9125 Points ∼93% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8342 - 11440, n=11)
9555 Points ∼97% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=367)
5225 Points ∼53% -44%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11167 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼84% -2%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
12095 Points ∼93% +8%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
13047 Points ∼100% +17%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
9397 Points ∼72% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
8626 Points ∼66% -23%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11890 Points ∼91% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10330 - 14439, n=11)
12008 Points ∼92% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14439, n=538)
5652 Points ∼43% -49%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2657 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼99% +24%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3324 Points ∼100% +25%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2492 Points ∼75% -6%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2314 Points ∼70% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2708 Points ∼81% +2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2794 Points ∼84% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2104 - 3365, n=11)
2979 Points ∼90% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=54)
2680 Points ∼81% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5702 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼98% 0%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5862 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5747 Points ∼98% +1%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1416 Points ∼24% -75%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2160 Points ∼37% -62%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4236 Points ∼72% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4236 - 5862, n=11)
5548 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=54)
2699 Points ∼46% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4548 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼98% +8%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5012 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4454 Points ∼89% -2%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1550 Points ∼31% -66%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2262 Points ∼45% -50%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3800 Points ∼76% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3800 - 5012, n=11)
4640 Points ∼93% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=54)
2460 Points ∼49% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3280 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼85% +14%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4416 Points ∼100% +35%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2840 Points ∼64% -13%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2532 Points ∼57% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3160 Points ∼72% -4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3309 Points ∼75% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1934 - 4535, n=11)
3733 Points ∼85% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=373)
1938 Points ∼44% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6739 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% +5%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7089 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7069 Points ∼100% +5%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1612 Points ∼23% -76%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2438 Points ∼34% -64%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5184 Points ∼73% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5184 - 7115, n=11)
6745 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8206, n=373)
1701 Points ∼24% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5440 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼95% +9%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6249 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5311 Points ∼85% -2%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1754 Points ∼28% -68%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2568 Points ∼41% -53%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4604 Points ∼74% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3969 - 6312, n=11)
5675 Points ∼91% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6312, n=374)
1589 Points ∼25% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3288 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼81% +15%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4405 Points ∼94% +34%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4703 Points ∼100% +43%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2495 Points ∼53% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3025 Points ∼64% -8%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3293 Points ∼70% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2345 - 4703, n=10)
3878 Points ∼82% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=401)
1848 Points ∼39% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6730 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +53%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10302 Points ∼100% +53%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10290 Points ∼100% +53%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2537 Points ∼25% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3635 Points ∼35% -46%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6358 Points ∼62% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6358 - 10420, n=10)
9416 Points ∼91% +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 14951, n=401)
2227 Points ∼22% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5460 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼91% +36%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7940 Points ∼98% +45%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8141 Points ∼100% +49%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2528 Points ∼31% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3479 Points ∼43% -36%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5268 Points ∼65% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5268 - 8141, n=10)
7099 Points ∼87% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 8141, n=401)
1905 Points ∼23% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3724 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼87% +1%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4093 Points ∼95% +10%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4320 Points ∼100% +16%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2466 Points ∼57% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3215 Points ∼74% -14%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3242 Points ∼75% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2705 - 4320, n=11)
3756 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=452)
1844 Points ∼43% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6336 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6336 Points ∼100% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1487 Points ∼23% -76%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points ∼35% -65%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6040 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5663 - 6362, n=11)
6235 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 6362, n=452)
1404 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5475 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼97% +1%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5648 Points ∼99% +3%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5705 Points ∼100% +4%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1631 Points ∼29% -70%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points ∼42% -56%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5068 Points ∼89% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4556 - 5734, n=11)
5418 Points ∼95% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 5734, n=453)
1357 Points ∼24% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3726 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼81% -3%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4068 Points ∼91% +9%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4454 Points ∼100% +20%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2489 Points ∼56% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3211 Points ∼72% -14%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3505 Points ∼79% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3505 - 4454, n=10)
3910 Points ∼88% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4454, n=494)
1714 Points ∼38% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +58%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10008 Points ∼100% +58%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9973 Points ∼100% +58%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2428 Points ∼24% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3478 Points ∼35% -45%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6122 Points ∼61% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6122 - 10008, n=10)
9125 Points ∼91% +44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=493)
1844 Points ∼18% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5478 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼92% +31%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7556 Points ∼97% +38%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7820 Points ∼100% +43%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2441 Points ∼31% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3415 Points ∼44% -38%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5251 Points ∼67% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5251 - 7820, n=10)
7026 Points ∼90% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=496)
1603 Points ∼20% -71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
27278 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼75% -7%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33697 Points ∼100% +24%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
14631 Points ∼43% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
19389 Points ∼58% -29%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30972 Points ∼92% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (23877 - 45072, n=10)
31426 Points ∼93% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=653)
13917 Points ∼41% -49%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
103955 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
35596 Points ∼33% -66%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
51091 Points ∼48% -51%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97354 Points ∼91% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (97354 - 110432, n=9)
105714 Points ∼99% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 162695, n=651)
20570 Points ∼19% -80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
63969 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼91% -3%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
26999 Points ∼40% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
37475 Points ∼55% -41%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
65945 Points ∼97% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (60279 - 83518, n=9)
68300 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 83518, n=651)
17077 Points ∼25% -73%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
58 fps ∼35% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
84 fps ∼50% -50%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps ∼51% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (85 - 167, n=12)
160 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 251, n=675)
36 fps ∼22% -78%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼87% -13%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼87% -13%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼87% -13%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
53 fps ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
59 fps ∼86% -14%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼87% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (59 - 91, n=12)
63.3 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=684)
27.6 fps ∼40% -60%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
90 fps ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
100 fps ∼100% +11%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97 fps ∼97% +8%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29 fps ∼29% -68%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps ∼42% -53%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
50 fps ∼50% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (50 - 102, n=12)
95 fps ∼95% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 132, n=581)
20.5 fps ∼21% -77%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼99% +2%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼99% +2%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼99% +2%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
28 fps ∼46% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps ∼60% -39%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼84% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (51 - 85, n=12)
60.5 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=590)
18.9 fps ∼31% -68%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
62 fps ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
67 fps ∼97% +8%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +11%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
20 fps ∼29% -68%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼43% -52%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35 fps ∼51% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (35 - 71, n=12)
62.5 fps ∼91% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 88, n=447)
16.8 fps ∼24% -73%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
51 fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +14%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼98% +12%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼98% +12%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
19 fps ∼33% -63%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps ∼45% -49%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼62% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (36 - 58, n=12)
49.2 fps ∼85% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=449)
16.2 fps ∼28% -68%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼92% +41%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼100% +53%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼92% +41%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7.2 fps ∼28% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼38% -41%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
14 fps ∼54% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (14 - 26, n=11)
21.5 fps ∼83% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 59, n=165)
9.37 fps ∼36% -45%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼71% -29%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼67% -33%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
4.5 fps ∼19% -81%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6.8 fps ∼28% -72%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8.5 fps ∼35% -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8.5 - 24, n=12)
16.9 fps ∼70% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 31, n=164)
6.54 fps ∼27% -73%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼97% +3%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼100% +6%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼95% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼29% -69%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼42% -56%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼58% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 38, n=11)
34.2 fps ∼90% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 59, n=169)
13.9 fps ∼37% -61%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼95% -2%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼100% +2%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼98% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼28% -71%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼42% -57%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼51% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=12)
40.3 fps ∼94% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 63, n=169)
15.3 fps ∼36% -64%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +17%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼100% +17%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +17%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼26% -69%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼40% -53%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼52% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 42, n=12)
39.8 fps ∼95% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 54, n=372)
11.5 fps ∼27% -68%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼93% -7%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
37 fps ∼90% -10%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼88% -12%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼27% -73%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼37% -63%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
21 fps ∼51% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (21 - 41, n=12)
32.9 fps ∼80% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 58, n=376)
10.4 fps ∼25% -75%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
372734 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼94% +1%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
370908 Points ∼93% 0%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
398720 Points ∼100% +7%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
158868 Points ∼40% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
202586 Points ∼51% -46%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
321145 Points ∼81% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (217967 - 398720, n=12)
353615 Points ∼89% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 398720, n=283)
136819 Points ∼34% -63%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1076 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼98% +28%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1407 Points ∼100% +31%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1321 Points ∼94% +23%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1186 Points ∼84% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
1117 Points ∼79% +4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1171 Points ∼83% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1076 - 1431, n=11)
1321 Points ∼94% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=621)
751 Points ∼53% -30%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8700 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼98% +7%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9477 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9416 Points ∼99% +8%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2815 Points ∼30% -68%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3855 Points ∼41% -56%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8414 Points ∼89% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8125 - 9477, n=11)
9109 Points ∼96% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=621)
1986 Points ∼21% -77%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3922 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼54% +3%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5610 Points ∼75% +43%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7500 Points ∼100% +91%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
3316 Points ∼44% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3435 Points ∼46% -12%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4324 Points ∼58% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2661 - 7500, n=11)
4976 Points ∼66% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=621)
1487 Points ∼20% -62%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7423 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼93% +14%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8986 Points ∼99% +21%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9094 Points ∼100% +23%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5507 Points ∼61% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6484 Points ∼71% -13%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8718 Points ∼96% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5993 - 9143, n=11)
8480 Points ∼93% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=621)
2910 Points ∼32% -61%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4045 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼85% +14%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5089 Points ∼94% +26%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5397 Points ∼100% +33%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2794 Points ∼52% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3129 Points ∼58% -23%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4389 Points ∼81% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3847 - 5397, n=11)
4716 Points ∼87% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=621)
1460 Points ∼27% -64%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
63.057 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
59.651 Points ∼95% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
58.746 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼91% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 63.1, n=10)
57.1 Points ∼91% -3%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
53.783 Points ∼85% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
40.021 Points ∼63% -32%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
32.083 Points ∼51% -45%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 108, n=94)
31.9 Points ∼51% -46%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus 7 (Chome 74)
67.9 runs/min ∼100% +60%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
66.7 runs/min ∼98% +57%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼97% +55%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75)
64.1 runs/min ∼94% +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=9)
60.6 runs/min ∼89% +43%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
42.5 runs/min ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chome 75)
38.9 runs/min ∼57% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=84)
34.9 runs/min ∼51% -18%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
32.5 runs/min ∼48% -24%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
110 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼98% +1%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
108 Points ∼98% +1%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼97% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (94 - 114, n=12)
106 Points ∼96% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77 Points ∼70% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=150)
64.2 Points ∼58% -40%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼56% -42%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
25051 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼98% +19%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
24313 Points ∼97% +18%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
23830 Points ∼95% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=12)
22912 Points ∼91% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
20598 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
16358 Points ∼65% -21%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
11056 Points ∼44% -46%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 43280, n=677)
6450 Points ∼26% -69%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=702)
10678 ms * ∼100% -358%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
3360.7 ms * ∼31% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
3027 ms * ∼28% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
2333.5 ms * ∼22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=11)
2141 ms * ∼20% +8%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
2036 ms * ∼19% +13%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
2029.5 ms * ∼19% +13%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
1958 ms * ∼18% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼18% +20%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 9T ProXiaomi Mi 9OnePlus 7Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KLGoogle Pixel 3a XLSamsung Galaxy A80LG G8s ThinQAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
24%
31%
5%
-37%
-36%
-23%
-12%
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
46.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.5 (27.8 - 72.4, n=17)
49 (3.4 - 87.1, n=410)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
87.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77 (31.3 - 88.2, n=17)
67.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=410)
Random Write 4KB
148.51
165.32
11%
28.7
-81%
160.18
8%
86.96
-41%
21.6
-85%
29.6
-80%
86.8 (18.2 - 250, n=39)
-42%
21.3 (0.14 - 250, n=730)
-86%
Random Read 4KB
142.5
149.36
5%
175.3
23%
153.29
8%
92.12
-35%
117.5
-18%
138
-3%
139 (98.9 - 158, n=39)
-2%
46.1 (1.59 - 196, n=730)
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB
196.87
388.27
97%
392
99%
195.6
-1%
179.09
-9%
190.4
-3%
182.4
-7%
205 (182 - 503, n=39)
4%
94.6 (2.99 - 590, n=730)
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
808.76
666.06
-18%
1463
81%
831.4
3%
315.6
-61%
501.5
-38%
791.1
-2%
751 (427 - 912, n=39)
-7%
266 (12.1 - 1504, n=730)
-67%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro - GFXBench
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro - GFXBench
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro - GFXBench
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro - GFXBench
Hög belastning
 42.1 °C38.1 °C34.6 °C 
 40.3 °C37.9 °C34.9 °C 
 38.6 °C37.1 °C34.7 °C 
Max: 42.1 °C
Medel: 37.6 °C
33.6 °C37.6 °C41.7 °C
34 °C37.1 °C40.3 °C
33.7 °C37.1 °C37.3 °C
Max: 41.7 °C
Medel: 36.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  35.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.947.32543.642.63138.339.74038.339.45041.242.46334.135802729.710028.631.812527.932.716026.145.820025.150.62502253.331520.55740020.561.150020.665.663018.668.580018.171.2100018.577.8125017.975.5160018.676.8200017.877.3250017.577.6315016.976.2400016.868.650001769.563001775.6800017.280.91000017.179.61250017.162.11600017.347.8SPL78.865.174.766.430.387.9N42.119.134.418.71.472.9median 18.1median 68.6Delta2.712.239.432.928.325.418.726.526.725.933.229.422.622.721.822.224.43123.839.218.550.417.149.117.853.815.556.114.162.51467.913.869.114.773.515.47715.276.614.376.514.574.913.971.714.675.914.178.114.374.314.574.614.875.714.87514.864.41558.226.887.10.871.4median 14.8median 71.71.510hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 9T ProXiaomi Mi 9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.7 / 1 / 1.3 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.2 / 10 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 3a XL
3700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
3%
-1%
-44%
2%
4%
-36%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.67
4%
0.6
14%
0.81
-16%
0.7
-0%
0.6
14%
1.2
-71%
Idle Average *
1
1.26
-26%
1.1
-10%
2.35
-135%
1.63
-63%
1.2
-20%
1.6
-60%
Idle Maximum *
1.3
1.29
1%
2
-54%
2.37
-82%
1.67
-28%
1.4
-8%
2
-54%
Load Average *
5.2
3.71
29%
4
23%
5.33
-3%
2.64
49%
5
4%
5
4%
Load Maximum *
10
9.3
7%
8
20%
8.55
14%
4.62
54%
7.1
29%
10
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
29tim 28min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12tim 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16tim 27min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 9min
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 3a XL
3700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Battery Runtime
-14%
10%
52%
2%
-8%
-14%
Reader / Idle
1768
1650
-7%
1989
13%
2114
20%
1822
3%
1796
2%
1689
-4%
H.264
987
1008
2%
933
-5%
2138
117%
960
-3%
902
-9%
753
-24%
WiFi v1.3
762
546
-28%
901
18%
801
5%
709
-7%
713
-6%
693
-9%
Load
249
194
-22%
278
12%
409
64%
289
16%
200
-20%
203
-18%

För

+ kantfri design
+ exakt GPS
+ skaplig OLED-skärm
+ 3.5 mm ljudanslutning
+ bra kameror
+ bra systemprestanda
+ snabb fingeravtrycksläsare inbyggd i skärmen

Emot

- endast certifierad för Widevine L3 (Redmi K20 Pro)
- långsamt WiFi
- dålig LTE-täckning (Redmi K20 Pro)
- den maximala ljusstyrkan som går att ställa in manuellt är svag
- laddare på 27W ingår inte i förpackningen
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro). Recensionsex från TradingShenzhen.
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro). Recensionsex från TradingShenzhen.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Mi 9T Pro, eller Redmi K20 Pro beroende på var du bor, är ytterligare en kraftfull men ändå billig smartphone från Xiaomi. Om Xiaomi släpper Mi 9T Pro över hela världen för runt 4.000 kronor, vilket återförsäljare tar för Redmi K20 Pro, rekommenderar vi att du överväger den om du letar efter en telefon för under 5.000 kronor.

En av enhetens största höjdpunkter är den tjusiga AMOLED-skärmen som knappt har någon infattning alls tack vare den utfällbara framåtriktade kameran. En Snapdragon 855 och 8 GB RAM finns på plats för att leverera utmärkt prestanda samtidigt som lagringen på 128 GB är bland den snabbaste UFS 2.1-lagringen som finns på marknaden. Vi uppskattar också att Xiaomi har hållt kvar vid en optisk fingeravtrycksläsare inbyggd i skärmen då det gör att enheten känns mer framtidssäkrad än många andra aktuella modeller.

Men Mi 9T Pro har också sina brister, även om den internationella modellen skulle åtgärda en del av problemen vi har med enheten. Den begränsade LTE-täckningen och Widevine L3-certifieringen borde inte påverka den internationella modellen, men monohögtalaren samt att den saknar utökningsbar lagring, trådlös laddning och IP-certifiering stör oss. Vi tror heller inte att en internationell modell skulle åtgärda problemen med att processorn stryps och MIUI är en fråga om smak.

Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, mer känd som Redmi K20 Pro i en del områden, är en utmärkt allt-i-allo, men den saknar den polering som Mi 9 har.

Den motordriva utfällbara selfiekameran och den jackfria designen hjälper definitivt Mi 9T Pro att stå ut från sina konkurrenter, men det verkar kortsiktigt av Xiaomi att marknadsföra enheten som en del av Mi 9-serien. Även om Mi 9T Pro kostar ungefär lika mycket som Mi 9 gör en långsammare WiFi-modul, monohögtalaren, långsammare flashlagring, en dåligt kalibrerad skärm och sämre temperaturhantering att den är svårare att sälja än sin motsvarighet med nästan samma namn. Den förstnämnda har dock ett större batteri, bättre batteritid och en 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, vilket för vissa kan få skalan att tippa över till fördel för Mi 9T Pro.

Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro - 07/30/2019 v6(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Design
85%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
91%
Anslutningar
47 / 60 → 78%
Vikt
89%
Batteri
96%
Skärm
95%
Spelprestanda
70 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
80 / 70 → 100%
Temperatur
88%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%
Camera
79%
Medel
81%
89%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro) - Inte ytterligare en Mi 9 med uppfällbar kamera
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-08-18 (Update: 2019-08-18)