Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite - Mycket pang för pengarna (Sammanfattning)

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 12/09/2019

Fingeravtrycksläsare i skärmen ingår. Xiaomis Mi 9 Lite kan skryta med mycket teknik och höjer ribban dramatiskt för telefoner som kostar 2.500 kronor. I den här recensionen får du reda på huruvida den Kinesiska telefonen presterar tillfredsställande.

Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Mi 9 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Minne
6144 MB 
, DDR4x, 2.133 MHz, Dubbla kanaler
Skärm
6.39 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 403 PPI, Kapacitiv, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja, HDR
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infraröd, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, USB Typ C, Kortläsare: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT, upp till 256GB), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass, USB-C
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5, 2G GSM (B2/B3/B5/B8), 3G WCDMA (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G LTE FDD/TDE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.67 x 156.8 x 74.5
Batteri
4030 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8, 1/2", 0.8µm) + 8MP + 2MP
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 0.8 µm)
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2 Högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Modulär USB-nätadapter, USB Typ C-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Skyddsfodral, MIUI Global 10.3.6 Stable, 12 Månader Garanti, SAR (Huvud): 1,42 W/kg, SAR (Kropp): 1,4 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
179 g, Strömförsörjning: 80 g
Pris
250 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Jämförelseenheter

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80 %
12/2019
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
SD 710, Adreno 616
179 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.39"2340x1080
80 %
05/2019
Samsung Galaxy A50
Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3
166 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080
79 %
10/2019
Nokia 7.2
SD 660, Adreno 512
180 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
77 %
11/2019
HTC Desire 19+
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320
170 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.2"1520x720
78 %
11/2019
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
SD 665, Adreno 610
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2280x1080
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite

Storleksjämförelse

159.92 mm 75.15 mm 8.25 mm 180 g158.4 mm 75.8 mm 9.1 mm 188 g158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g156.8 mm 74.5 mm 8.67 mm 179 g156.2 mm 74.8 mm 8.5 mm 170 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Adreno 616, SD 710, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
347 (min: 338, max: 351) MBit/s ∼100%
Nokia 7.2
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
344 (min: 336, max: 352) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=504)
244 MBit/s ∼70% -30%
HTC Desire 19+
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
186 (min: 115, max: 228) MBit/s ∼54% -46%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
182 (min: 11, max: 259) MBit/s ∼52% -48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 7.2
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
296 (min: 223, max: 308) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Adreno 616, SD 710, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
296 (min: 228, max: 370) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=504)
227 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
152 (min: 1, max: 254) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
HTC Desire 19+
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
84 (min: 22, max: 191) MBit/s ∼28% -72%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø347 (338-351)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø296 (228-370)
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
35 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
27 ∆E
62 ∆E
63 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
71.8 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
82.3 ∆E
68.6 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite: 44.62 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 82.34 ∆E
ColorChecker
12.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite: 6.48 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 17.11 ∆E
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite - Testkarta
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite - Testkarta (inzoomad)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite - Testkarta (1 lux)
623
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
638
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 638 cd/m² Medel: 626.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.51 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 97 %
Mitt på batteriet: 618 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
95.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Nokia 7.2
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
HTC Desire 19+
IPS, 1520x720, 6.2
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3
Screen
-85%
-175%
-134%
-172%
Brightness middle
618
644
4%
604
-2%
491
-21%
597
-3%
Brightness
626
628
0%
593
-5%
470
-25%
596
-5%
Brightness Distribution
97
91
-6%
92
-5%
84
-13%
93
-4%
Black Level *
0.4
0.33
0.52
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1
2.64
-164%
5.1
-410%
4.34
-334%
5.93
-493%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.4
9.23
-285%
10.3
-329%
8.17
-240%
9.42
-293%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
2.5
-56%
6.4
-300%
4.3
-169%
5.3
-231%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.024 109%
2.23 99%
2.302 96%
2.232 99%
CCT
6389 102%
6649 98%
8149 80%
7214 90%
7632 85%
Contrast
1510
1488
1148

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17159 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
680 Points ∼49%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
183 Points ∼13% -73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
680 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3794, n=44)
1380 Points ∼100% +103%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
830 Points ∼47%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
601 Points ∼34% -28%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
370 Points ∼21% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
830 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=52)
1756 Points ∼100% +112%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1515 Points ∼83%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1483 Points ∼81% -2%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1031 Points ∼56% -32%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1379 Points ∼75% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
1515 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=64)
1831 Points ∼100% +21%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
394 Points ∼75%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
313 Points ∼60% -21%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
165 Points ∼32% -58%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
315 Points ∼60% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
394 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=64)
522 Points ∼100% +32%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
6719 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼87% -13%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5917 Points ∼88% -12%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5703 Points ∼85% -15%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6534 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (6453 - 6887, n=5)
6696 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=438)
5517 Points ∼82% -18%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
8093 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼86% -13%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7753 Points ∼95% -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8186 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (7041 - 8414, n=5)
7895 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=601)
6014 Points ∼73% -26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2337 Points ∼87%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2207 Points ∼83% -6%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2268 Points ∼85% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2129 - 2337, n=2)
2233 Points ∼84% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=105)
2672 Points ∼100% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1630 Points ∼58%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1141 Points ∼41% -30%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
901 Points ∼32% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1579 - 1630, n=2)
1605 Points ∼57% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=105)
2795 Points ∼100% +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1747 Points ∼69%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1278 Points ∼50% -27%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1040 Points ∼41% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1675 - 1747, n=2)
1711 Points ∼68% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=105)
2532 Points ∼100% +45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2462 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼84% -8%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2693 Points ∼100% +9%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1221 Points ∼45% -50%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2341 Points ∼87% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1840 - 2534, n=5)
2252 Points ∼84% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=444)
2043 Points ∼76% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1842 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼63% -36%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1256 Points ∼67% -32%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
489 Points ∼26% -73%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
981 Points ∼52% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1842 - 1875, n=5)
1859 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9345, n=444)
1882 Points ∼100% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1951 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼68% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1425 Points ∼73% -27%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
564 Points ∼29% -71%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1126 Points ∼58% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1867 - 1981, n=5)
1928 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 7982, n=445)
1748 Points ∼90% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2447 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼85% -8%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2640 Points ∼100% +8%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1213 Points ∼46% -50%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2393 Points ∼91% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1862 - 2526, n=5)
2307 Points ∼87% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5209, n=473)
1954 Points ∼74% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2853 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼54% -46%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2007 Points ∼70% -30%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
817 Points ∼29% -71%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1670 Points ∼58% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2841 - 2887, n=5)
2864 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=473)
2498 Points ∼87% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2752 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼61% -39%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2120 Points ∼77% -23%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
881 Points ∼32% -68%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1790 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2544 - 2798, n=5)
2711 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=473)
2105 Points ∼76% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2435 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼89% -3%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2649 Points ∼100% +9%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1183 Points ∼45% -51%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2424 Points ∼92% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2054 - 2514, n=5)
2379 Points ∼90% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4909, n=524)
1946 Points ∼73% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1698 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼67% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1181 Points ∼69% -30%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
441 Points ∼26% -74%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
979 Points ∼57% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1698 - 1714, n=5)
1706 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=524)
1571 Points ∼92% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1820 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼71% -29%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1347 Points ∼74% -26%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
512 Points ∼28% -72%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1128 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1774 - 1836, n=5)
1819 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7012, n=525)
1504 Points ∼83% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2441 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼92% 0%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2632 Points ∼100% +8%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1177 Points ∼45% -52%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2452 Points ∼93% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1878 - 2495, n=5)
2336 Points ∼89% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=565)
1814 Points ∼69% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2730 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼47% -53%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1913 Points ∼70% -30%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
733 Points ∼27% -73%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1634 Points ∼59% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2725 - 2767, n=5)
2748 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11488, n=564)
2053 Points ∼75% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2660 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼54% -46%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2037 Points ∼77% -23%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
800 Points ∼30% -70%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1765 Points ∼66% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2490 - 2694, n=5)
2636 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8866, n=567)
1774 Points ∼67% -33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
13595 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼77% +6%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
18094 Points ∼97% +33%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
17468 Points ∼93% +28%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18698 Points ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13595 - 14820, n=5)
14273 Points ∼76% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=715)
14596 Points ∼78% +7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
39745 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼42% -58%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
28898 Points ∼73% -27%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
12205 Points ∼31% -69%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24992 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (37157 - 39745, n=5)
38928 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=713)
23210 Points ∼58% -42%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
27843 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼57% -42%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
25513 Points ∼91% -8%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
13081 Points ∼47% -53%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23253 Points ∼83% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (26967 - 28895, n=5)
28116 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=713)
18684 Points ∼66% -33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
56 fps ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼62% -30%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
50 fps ∼79% -11%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼57% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (56 - 65, n=5)
63.2 fps ∼100% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=733)
40.2 fps ∼64% -28%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
65 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼55% -45%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
46 fps ∼71% -29%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼52% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (54 - 65, n=5)
57.4 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=742)
29.1 fps ∼45% -55%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
32 fps ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼71% -28%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼71% -28%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼62% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (32 - 33, n=5)
32.4 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=637)
23.4 fps ∼72% -27%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
20 fps ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼76% +5%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
21 fps ∼76% +5%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18 fps ∼65% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (20 - 31, n=5)
27.6 fps ∼100% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=646)
20.3 fps ∼74% +2%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
23 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼61% -39%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼65% -35%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼57% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (23 - 23, n=5)
23 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=502)
18.9 fps ∼82% -18%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
21 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼62% -38%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
13 fps ∼62% -38%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼57% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (19 - 22, n=5)
20.8 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=504)
17.5 fps ∼83% -17%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
7.8 fps ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼48% -37%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
4.9 fps ∼48% -37%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.7 fps ∼46% -40%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps ∼44% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5.9 - 8.4, n=5)
7.44 fps ∼72% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=237)
10.3 fps ∼100% +32%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
5.1 fps ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼42% -39%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
3.2 fps ∼43% -37%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps ∼20% -71%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼38% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (4.9 - 7.8, n=5)
5.6 fps ∼76% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=235)
7.36 fps ∼100% +44%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
12 fps ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼54% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.7 fps ∼51% -36%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.3 fps ∼48% -39%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps ∼50% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (11 - 13, n=5)
12.2 fps ∼80% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=241)
15.2 fps ∼100% +27%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼52% -36%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.7 fps ∼50% -38%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
3.9 fps ∼23% -72%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.2 fps ∼47% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13 - 14, n=5)
13.8 fps ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=241)
17.3 fps ∼100% +24%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼68% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9 fps ∼69% -31%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.2 fps ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13 - 13, n=5)
13 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=427)
12.8 fps ∼98% -2%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
12 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼68% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.2 fps ∼68% -32%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.6 fps ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (11 - 13, n=5)
12 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=431)
11.4 fps ∼95% -5%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
172068 Points ∼61%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
157877 Points ∼56% -8%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
169222 Points ∼60% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
172068 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 599843, n=53)
281636 Points ∼100% +64%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1155 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼80% -20%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
926 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1070 - 1155, n=5)
1107 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=668)
778 Points ∼67% -33%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
3100 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼63% -37%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1916 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2906 - 3102, n=5)
3050 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=668)
2206 Points ∼71% -29%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2872 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼81% -13%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2835 Points ∼92% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2872 - 3575, n=5)
3092 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=668)
1619 Points ∼52% -44%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
5813 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼88% -12%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5000 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5603 - 5813, n=5)
5702 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=668)
3145 Points ∼54% -46%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2780 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼79% -21%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2240 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2731 - 2855, n=5)
2775 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=668)
1580 Points ∼57% -43%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=133)
37.1 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
36.478 Points ∼98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (29 - 36.5, n=2)
32.7 Points ∼88% -10%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
30.531 Points ∼82% -16%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
66.615 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (50.5 - 66.6, n=5)
62.9 Points ∼94% -6%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
49.754 Points ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=564)
43.6 Points ∼65% -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=121)
40.6 runs/min ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
38.7 runs/min ∼95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (36.7 - 38.7, n=2)
37.7 runs/min ∼93% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)
33.07 runs/min ∼81% -15%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
30.5 runs/min ∼75% -21%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
69 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (58 - 72, n=5)
68 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=196)
67.6 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼90% -10%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
51 Points ∼74% -26%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
12520 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (10885 - 12802, n=5)
12227 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼82% -18%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
9107 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=725)
7128 Points ∼57% -43%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=750)
10258 ms * ∼100% -185%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
4504 ms * ∼44% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼38% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
3593.7 ms * ∼35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (3035 - 3800, n=5)
3333 ms * ∼32% +7%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 9 LiteSamsung Galaxy A50Nokia 7.2HTC Desire 19+Motorola Moto G8 PlusAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-20%
-32%
-29%
-19%
-10%
-44%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.89 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
63.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
61.75 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
52.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-18%
54.8 (28.6 - 70.2, n=13)
-14%
50.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=470)
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
83.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
81.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
72.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-16%
72.2 (46 - 86, n=13)
-16%
68.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=470)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
116.6
18.2
-84%
13.38
-89%
20.4
-83%
124.9
7%
81.5 (13.5 - 180, n=17)
-30%
26.1 (0.14 - 259, n=802)
-78%
Random Read 4KB
113.5
98.9
-13%
79.64
-30%
76.5
-33%
59.9
-47%
121 (88.4 - 173, n=17)
7%
51.3 (1.59 - 226, n=802)
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB
252.1
192.1
-24%
161.4
-36%
210.8
-16%
217.4
-14%
193 (143 - 257, n=17)
-23%
107 (2.99 - 729, n=802)
-58%
Sequential Read 256KB
421.5
507.3
20%
290.83
-31%
288
-32%
302.5
-28%
491 (409 - 733, n=17)
16%
295 (12.1 - 1781, n=802)
-30%
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.4 (21-31)
; Standard / low: Ø29.7 (23-31)
Arena of Valor
010203040506070Tooltip
; min: Ø60 (58-61)
; high HD: Ø60 (56-61)
Hög belastning
 40.8 °C37.2 °C34 °C 
 40.5 °C37 °C34 °C 
 39.4 °C36.9 °C33.8 °C 
Max: 40.8 °C
Medel: 37.1 °C
32.6 °C35.7 °C39.7 °C
32.9 °C35.3 °C39.3 °C
33.4 °C35.8 °C38.3 °C
Max: 39.7 °C
Medel: 35.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  39.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.935.12529.132.53125.426.94029.426.95039.441.56327.326.88021.626.61002424.512520.732.816019.945.52001848.625016.851.931516.256.240015.959.250013.564.763013.967.180012.973.810001476.6125014.775.6160014.174.4200014.274.2250014.575.8315015.475.1400014.979.2500014.879.163001575.5800015.373.41000015.363.21250015.661.41600015.568.7SPL2787.4N0.970.1median 15.3median 68.7Delta1.311.141.239.237.53630.528.43329.237.635.928.624.523.923.222.823.421.925.820.336.6204519.152.71754.316.555.916.863.316.270.315.571.114.87014.171.715.572.715.574.114.572.913.871.813.771.213.871.61468.31464.814.163.514.257.714.351.862.127.18314.70.954.1median 15.5median 64.81.911.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 9 LiteMotorola Moto G8 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Motorola Moto G8 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.2 / 1.6 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 2.6 / 4.5 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
4030 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Nokia 7.2
3500 mAh
HTC Desire 19+
3850 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-48%
-61%
-52%
-94%
-19%
-34%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.8
-0%
0.77
4%
1.3
-63%
1.7
-113%
0.79 (0.76 - 0.8, n=4)
1%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=818)
-10%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.5
-25%
2.32
-93%
2
-67%
2.3
-92%
1.543 (1.2 - 2.07, n=4)
-29%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=817)
-45%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
1.7
-6%
2.41
-51%
2.9
-81%
3.5
-119%
1.903 (1.6 - 2.31, n=4)
-19%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=818)
-27%
Load Average *
2.6
5.9
-127%
4.44
-71%
3.6
-38%
4.7
-81%
3.37 (2.6 - 3.97, n=4)
-30%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=812)
-57%
Load Maximum *
4.5
8.3
-84%
8.79
-95%
5
-11%
7.5
-67%
5.21 (4.5 - 5.82, n=4)
-16%
5.99 (1.2 - 14.2, n=812)
-33%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
49tim 17min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12tim 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14tim 51min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 14min
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
4030 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Nokia 7.2
3500 mAh
HTC Desire 19+
3850 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-22%
8%
8%
Reader / Idle
2957
1587
-46%
2002
-32%
H.264
891
869
-2%
996
12%
WiFi v1.3
734
701
-4%
570
-22%
795
8%
980
34%
Load
254
275
8%
302
19%

För

+ Skaplig systemprestanda
+ Fingeravtrycksläsare inbyggd i skärmen
+ Bra prestanda i förhållande till priset

Emot

- En del inställningar går bara att ändra online efter att man skapat ett Mi-konto
- Kameran presterar dåligt vid låg ljusnivå
- Fingeravtrycksläsaren är en aning långsam
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Xiaomi försöker återigen bevisa att bra anslutbarhet och skaplig prestanda inte nödvändigtvis behöver vara dyrt. Mi 9 Lite lyckades prestera bättre än sina konkurrenter i ett flertal av våra tester och den kommer med funktioner som fingeravtrycksläsare inbyggd i skärmen och 2x optisk zoom, saker som tidigare varit begränsade till dyrare enheter från de högre kvalitetsskikten.

Xiaomi har lyckats göra nästan allt rätt med sin Mi 9 Lite. Det enda större felet är faktum att en del inställningar kräver en aktiv internetuppkoppling för att kunna ändras.

Batteritiden är okej men kunde varit en aning bättre. Det enda större felet rör mjukvaran. Även om lokaliseringen är oklanderlig så är det oacceptabelt att en del inställningar kräver en aktiv internetuppkoppling och ett Xiaomi-konto för att kunna ändras.

Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite - 12/02/2019 v7
Mike Wobker

Design
84%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
48 / 70 → 68%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
89%
Skärm
90%
Spelprestanda
21 / 64 → 33%
Programprestanda
62 / 86 → 72%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
58%
Medel
74%
80%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite - Mycket pang för pengarna (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2019-12- 9 (Update: 2019-12- 9)