Notebookcheck

Test: HTC Desire 19+ – 2.5 kameror och en fräck design (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 11/03/2019

Blå prick. HTC försöker sig på en smartphone med ett stort batteri och sätter dessutom en trippelkamera på baksidan. För runt 3.000 kronor känns det som ett rimligt erbjudande. Vi tar en närmare titt i vårt test.

HTC Desire 19 Plus
HTC Desire 19+ (Desire Serie)
Processor
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
Grafikkort
PowerVR GE8320
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.2 tum 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixlar 271 PPI, Kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, , 57 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: microSD, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, närhetssensor, kompass,, USB-C
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.5 x 156.2 x 74.8
Batteri
3850 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.85, fasjämförande AF, LED-blixt, @1080p/30fps video (kamera 1); 8.0MP, f/2.4, vidvinkelslins (kamera 2); 5.0MP, f/2.2, skärpedjup (kamera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.0, Video @1080p/​30fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på nedre kanten, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare, USB-kabel, headset, 24 Månader Garanti, LTE Cat-7 (Nerladdning) / Cat-13 (Uppladdning); Notis-LED, fanless
Vikt
170 g, Strömförsörjning: 49 g
Pris
299 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Jämförelseenheter

BewertungRating VersionDatumModellGewichtLaufwerkGroesseAufloesungPreis ab
77%711/2019HTC Desire 19+
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320
170 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.2"1520x720
85%605/2019Honor 20 Lite
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
164 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.21"2340x1080
82%606/2019LG Q60
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
172 g6.26"1520x720
78%708/2019Motorola One Action
Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3
176 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.3"2520x1080
HTC Desire 19+
HTC Desire 19+
HTC Desire 19+

Storleksjämförelse

161.3 mm 77 mm 8.7 mm 172 g160.1 mm 71.2 mm 9.2 mm 176 g156.2 mm 74.8 mm 8.5 mm 170 g154.8 mm 73.6 mm 8 mm 164 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola One Action
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
310 (min: 251, max: 328) MBit/s ∼100% +67%
HTC Desire 19+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
186 (min: 115, max: 228) MBit/s ∼60%
LG Q60
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
55.4 (min: 44, max: 68) MBit/s ∼18% -70%
Honor 20 Lite
802.11 b/g/n
53.6 (min: 44, max: 57) MBit/s ∼17% -71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola One Action
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
295 (min: 275, max: 312) MBit/s ∼100% +251%
HTC Desire 19+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
84 (min: 22, max: 191) MBit/s ∼28%
LG Q60
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
53.4 (min: 34, max: 59) MBit/s ∼18% -36%
Honor 20 Lite
802.11 b/g/n
53.2 (min: 47, max: 58) MBit/s ∼18% -37%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø186 (115-228)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø82.3 (22-191)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker Photo
11.2 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
ColorChecker HTC Desire 19+: 14.69 ∆E min: 7.28 - max: 31.61 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
4 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker HTC Desire 19+: 6.11 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 9.9 ∆E
Foto av vår testkarta
Foto av vår testkarta
502
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 502 cd/m² Medel: 470.1 cd/m² Minimum: 5.3 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 491 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1488:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.34 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
94.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.302
HTC Desire 19+
IPS, 1520x720, 6.2
Honor 20 Lite
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21
LG Q60
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Motorola One Action
IPS LCD, 2520x1080, 6.3
Response Times
-9%
3069%
19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
48 (23, 25)
58 (27, 31)
-21%
38 (19, 19)
21%
45.2 (20.8, 24.4)
6%
Response Time Black / White *
30 (17, 13)
32 (16, 16)
-7%
22 (11, 11)
27%
20.4 (8, 12.4)
32%
PWM Frequency
100
100 (15)
0%
9259 (20)
9159%
Screen
-17%
-26%
-17%
Brightness middle
491
455
-7%
477
-3%
564
15%
Brightness
470
456
-3%
437
-7%
540
15%
Brightness Distribution
84
94
12%
87
4%
93
11%
Black Level *
0.33
0.58
-76%
0.7
-112%
0.43
-30%
Contrast
1488
784
-47%
681
-54%
1312
-12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.34
4.43
-2%
4.84
-12%
5.5
-27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.17
6.81
17%
8.32
-2%
10.4
-27%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.3
5.4
-26%
5.2
-21%
7.7
-79%
Gamma
2.302 96%
2.248 98%
2.144 103%
2.12 104%
CCT
7214 90%
7336 89%
7376 88%
8465 77%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-13% / -15%
1522% / 818%
1% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 100 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9338 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 5
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1031 Points ∼52%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (915 - 1031, n=2)
973 Points ∼49% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=46)
1979 Points ∼100% +92%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
165 Points ∼29%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (165 - 176, n=2)
171 Points ∼30% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (155 - 1344, n=46)
572 Points ∼100% +247%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5703 Points ∼87%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5829 Points ∼89% +2%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4076 Points ∼62% -29%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6578 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (4886 - 5703, n=4)
5306 Points ∼81% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=398)
5367 Points ∼82% -6%
Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7753 Points ∼95%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7388 Points ∼90% -5%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4643 Points ∼57% -40%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8188 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (4045 - 7753, n=3)
6439 Points ∼79% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=565)
5831 Points ∼71% -25%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1221 Points ∼53%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2109 Points ∼92% +73%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
949 Points ∼41% -22%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2296 Points ∼100% +88%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (1021 - 1221, n=4)
1158 Points ∼50% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=405)
1996 Points ∼87% +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
489 Points ∼27%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
829 Points ∼46% +70%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
432 Points ∼24% -12%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1241 Points ∼69% +154%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (432 - 489, n=4)
462 Points ∼26% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=405)
1811 Points ∼100% +270%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
564 Points ∼34%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
958 Points ∼57% +70%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
492 Points ∼29% -13%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1357 Points ∼81% +141%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (496 - 564, n=4)
534 Points ∼32% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=406)
1681 Points ∼100% +198%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1213 Points ∼57%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2124 Points ∼99% +75%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
900 Points ∼42% -26%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2145 Points ∼100% +77%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (961 - 1213, n=4)
1141 Points ∼53% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=434)
1905 Points ∼89% +57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
817 Points ∼34%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1233 Points ∼51% +51%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
699 Points ∼29% -14%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1734 Points ∼72% +112%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (695 - 817, n=4)
758 Points ∼31% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=434)
2414 Points ∼100% +195%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
881 Points ∼43%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1360 Points ∼67% +54%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
736 Points ∼36% -16%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1814 Points ∼89% +106%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (741 - 881, n=4)
819 Points ∼40% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=434)
2027 Points ∼100% +130%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1183 Points ∼50%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2378 Points ∼100% +101%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
860 Points ∼36% -27%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2368 Points ∼100% +100%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (998 - 1183, n=4)
1107 Points ∼47% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=485)
1902 Points ∼80% +61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
441 Points ∼29%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
710 Points ∼47% +61%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
261 Points ∼17% -41%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1200 Points ∼80% +172%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (223 - 441, n=4)
372 Points ∼25% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=485)
1501 Points ∼100% +240%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
512 Points ∼35%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
841 Points ∼58% +64%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
309 Points ∼21% -40%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1348 Points ∼93% +163%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (270 - 512, n=4)
435 Points ∼30% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=486)
1444 Points ∼100% +182%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1177 Points ∼48%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2441 Points ∼100% +107%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
854 Points ∼35% -27%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2421 Points ∼99% +106%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (997 - 1177, n=4)
1103 Points ∼45% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=526)
1765 Points ∼72% +50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
733 Points ∼37%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
667 Points ∼34% -9%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
454 Points ∼23% -38%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1725 Points ∼88% +135%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (429 - 733, n=4)
618 Points ∼31% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=525)
1967 Points ∼100% +168%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
800 Points ∼44%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
795 Points ∼43% -1%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
507 Points ∼28% -37%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1830 Points ∼100% +129%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (491 - 800, n=4)
683 Points ∼37% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=528)
1697 Points ∼93% +112%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
17468 Points ∼76%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
9680 Points ∼42% -45%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
22995 Points ∼100% +32%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (10689 - 17468, n=4)
15442 Points ∼67% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=686)
14321 Points ∼62% -18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
12205 Points ∼52%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10728 Points ∼46% -12%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23539 Points ∼100% +93%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (7061 - 12205, n=4)
10467 Points ∼44% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=684)
22437 Points ∼95% +84%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
13081 Points ∼56%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10476 Points ∼45% -20%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23415 Points ∼100% +79%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (7637 - 13081, n=4)
11273 Points ∼48% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=684)
18114 Points ∼77% +38%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.7 fps ∼47%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼42% -11%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.3 fps ∼43% -9%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.2 fps ∼32% -32%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2.2 - 4.7, n=3)
3.07 fps ∼30% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=197)
10.1 fps ∼100% +115%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps ∼21%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼37% +73%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.4 fps ∼20% -7%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 (min: 3.2) fps ∼70% +227%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (1.4 - 1.5, n=3)
1.433 fps ∼20% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=196)
7.03 fps ∼100% +369%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.3 fps ∼49%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼43% -12%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.8 fps ∼46% -7%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼54% +11%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (3.5 - 7.3, n=4)
5.3 fps ∼36% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=201)
14.9 fps ∼100% +104%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
3.9 fps ∼23%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼42% +79%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.7 fps ∼22% -5%
Motorola One Action
Samsung Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.3 fps ∼56% +138%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (3.8 - 3.9, n=4)
3.83 fps ∼23% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=201)
16.7 fps ∼100% +328%
HTC Desire 19+Honor 20 LiteLG Q60Motorola One ActionAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
34%
-22%
108%
-7%
-20%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.75 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
58.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
70.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
57.4 (11.2 - 74.7, n=104)
-7%
49.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=436)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
75.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
79.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
78.09 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
76.5 (21.1 - 87.2, n=104)
-7%
67.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=436)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
20.4
73.1
258%
13.94
-32%
128.54
530%
24.8 (3.4 - 125, n=118)
22%
23.1 (0.14 - 259, n=762)
13%
Random Read 4KB
76.5
38.7
-49%
53.92
-30%
108.4
42%
55 (11.4 - 149, n=118)
-28%
48.5 (1.59 - 226, n=762)
-37%
Sequential Write 256KB
210.8
200.9
-5%
97.88
-54%
189.34
-10%
171 (40 - 246, n=118)
-19%
99.5 (2.99 - 590, n=762)
-53%
Sequential Read 256KB
288
288.1
0%
266.19
-8%
500.98
74%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=118)
-5%
280 (12.1 - 1781, n=762)
-3%
Hög belastning
 41.5 °C39.1 °C38 °C 
 41.4 °C38.2 °C38.3 °C 
 40.6 °C38.6 °C39.1 °C 
Max: 41.5 °C
Medel: 39.4 °C
38.5 °C39.1 °C42.2 °C
38.1 °C39.1 °C42.4 °C
37.8 °C39.3 °C41.6 °C
Max: 42.4 °C
Medel: 39.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  43.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.842.92542.541.63134.232.64034.235.65039.237.5632928.68025.826.610024.232.412524.440.716022.648.720021.45625021.461.131519.959.940019.161.350019.459.563018.662.280017.867.1100019.171.2125017.874.8160019.277.720001877.1250017.477.1315016.976.6400016.971.4500016.970.8630016.970.9800017.271.11000017.268.91250017.256.21600017.352.6SPL72.930.186N27.71.362.2median 18median 67.1Delta1.87.443.949.143.643.738.343.538.344.541.244.534.140.22733.128.634.827.929.126.131.825.143.12245.120.554.720.559.320.661.418.666.318.170.818.574.417.970.418.670.317.869.817.568.816.967.116.866.51771.51771.817.269.517.17217.154.217.356.974.766.430.381.934.418.71.453median 18.1median 66.52.710.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHTC Desire 19+Honor 20 Lite
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HTC Desire 19+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 20 Lite audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HTC Desire 19+
3850 mAh
Honor 20 Lite
3400 mAh
LG Q60
3500 mAh
Motorola One Action
3500 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
795
685
-14%
949
19%
697
-12%
663 (223 - 2636, n=628)
-17%
Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13tim 15min

För

+ vidvinkel ger en flexibel kamera
+ bra systemprestanda
+ skärmen är mer ljusstark och har bättre färgprecision
+ pålitlig fingeravtrycksläsare
+ tjusigt hölje
+ lång batteritid
+ kraftfull högtalare

Emot

- skärmen har en blå ton
- WLAN-överföringshastigheterna varierar
- jämförelsevis liten mängd lagring
- kamerans bilder saknar skärpa på detaljnivå

Omdöme - Bra, trots små brister

Recension av HTC Desire 19+. Recensionsex från HTC Germany.
Recension av HTC Desire 19+. Recensionsex från HTC Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Priset på HTC Desire 19+ har redan gått ner betydligt runtom internet. Inte konstigt det, för 3.000 kronor hade varit lite för dyrt i denna kraftigt konkurrensutsatta miljö även om telefonen argumenterar väl för sitt pris: Ett stort batteri är ett exempel, precis som en ljusstark och färgriktig skärm, en högtalare med bra ljud och skaplig systemprestanda. Dualkameran med sin extralins är flexibel och tar skapliga bilder.

Den har hyfsat snabbt WLAN och fingeravtrycksläsaren fungerar bra. Höljet finns dessutom i en hipp blå färg för mer extravaganta köpare och i en klassisk vit för mer återhållsamma personer, så det borde finnas något åt alla.

För priset på runt 2.000 kronor som den kostar på internet nu är den nästan ett fynd: Utöver en aningen ojämn skärmbelysning, en viss brist på detaljskärpa hos kameran och kraftiga variationer i WLAN-signalens kvalitet har vi knappt något att klaga på.

HTC Desire 19+ har blivit en bra telefon som dessutom behagar med ett extravagant yttre.

64 GB masslagring bör dessutom vara tillräckligt för de flesta, men i ärlighetens namn får man säga att en del konkurrenter erbjuder mer.

HTC Desire 19+ - 10/26/2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design
77%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
95%
Anslutningar
40 / 70 → 57%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
84%
Spelprestanda
8 / 64 → 12%
Programprestanda
57 / 86 → 67%
Temperatur
88%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
58%
Medel
71%
77%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: HTC Desire 19+ – 2.5 kameror och en fräck design (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2019-11- 3 (Update: 2019-11- 4)