Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 05/30/2019

Den ultimata enheten för gamers? Xiaomi Black Shark 2 kommer inte nöja sig med något annat än att vara den bästa speltelefonen. Med en avancerad Snapdragon 855 SoC, passiv vätskekylning, upp till 12 GB RAM och spelkontroller som tillbehör verkar den ha en riktigt god chans att lyckas med detta. Vår recension kommer att avslöja om gamers bör skaffa en.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Black Shark Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Minne
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Skärm
6.39 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 403 PPI, Kapacitiv, AMOLED, FHD+, glansig: ja, HDR
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113.5 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: USB-C till 3.5 mm ljudadapter, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhet, Kompass, Fingeravtrycksläsare, Liquid Cooling 3.0 System, RGB-belysning, Camera2 API Level 3, Quick Charge 4.0, aptX, aptX HD, WiFi Display, WiFi Direct, VoLTE
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.77 x 163.61 x 75.01
Batteri
4000 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48 MP (f/1,8, 1/2", 0,8 µm) + 12 MP (teleobjektiv, f/2,2, 1,0 µm, 2x optisk zoom)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2,0, 0,9 µm
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Modulär nätadapter (Quick Charge 3.0, 5V/3A, 9V/3A, 12V/2.25A, 20V/1.35A), USB-kabel (Typ A till Typ C), USB-C till 3.5 mm ljud-adapter, SIM-verktyg, Genomskinligt hölje, Snabbstartsguide, JoyUI, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
205 g, Strömförsörjning: 35 g
Pris
549 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

163.61 mm 75.01 mm 8.77 mm 205 g161.6 mm 75.4 mm 9.3 mm 190 g158.8 mm 76.2 mm 8.3 mm 212 g158.5 mm 78.99 mm 8.5 mm 219 g158.01 mm 73.37 mm 8.41 mm 192 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g149.9 mm 70.4 mm 7.8 mm 157 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 (min: 624, max: 683) MBit/s ∼97% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 (min: 612, max: 683) MBit/s ∼94% +9%
Razer Phone 2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
604 (min: 420, max: 626) MBit/s ∼89% +3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
586 (min: 267, max: 693) MBit/s ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=397)
220 MBit/s ∼32% -62%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
116 MBit/s ∼17% -80%
Asus ROG Phone
Adreno 630, 845, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
103 (min: 86, max: 109) MBit/s ∼15% -82%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
670 (min: 542, max: 717) MBit/s ∼100% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 (min: 558, max: 592) MBit/s ∼86% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼80% +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
527 (min: 410, max: 577) MBit/s ∼79%
Razer Phone 2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
388 (min: 234, max: 484) MBit/s ∼58% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=397)
210 MBit/s ∼31% -60%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
117 MBit/s ∼17% -78%
Asus ROG Phone
Adreno 630, 845, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
96.7 (min: 50, max: 106) MBit/s ∼14% -82%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø585 (267-693)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø527 (410-577)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2: Total sträcka
Xiaomi Black Shark 2: Total sträcka
Xiaomi Black Shark 2: Sjö
Xiaomi Black Shark 2: Sjö
Xiaomi Black Shark 2: Vägskäl
Xiaomi Black Shark 2: Vägskäl
Garmin Edge 500: Total sträcka
Garmin Edge 500: Total sträcka
Garmin Edge 500: Sjö
Garmin Edge 500: Sjö
Garmin Edge 500: Vägskäl
Garmin Edge 500: Vägskäl

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
401
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
410
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 424 cd/m² Medel: 411.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.36 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 409 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Asus ROG Phone
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6
Xiaomi Black Shark
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Razer Phone 2
IGZO LCD, UltraMotion 120 Hz Display, 2560x1440, 5.72
Samsung Galaxy S10
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1
Huawei P30 Pro
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
3%
-2%
26%
38%
46%
53%
Brightness middle
409
597
46%
549
34%
600
47%
701
71%
597
46%
593
45%
Brightness
412
637
55%
541
31%
577
40%
705
71%
608
48%
587
42%
Brightness Distribution
95
83
-13%
95
0%
92
-3%
98
3%
89
-6%
94
-1%
Black Level *
0.42
0.31
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.2
5.12
2%
6.08
-17%
3.43
34%
3.7
29%
2.2
58%
0.9
83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.9
10.9
-22%
10.69
-20%
6.36
29%
10.3
-16%
3.6
60%
2
78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
7.3
-52%
6.6
-38%
4.4
8%
1.4
71%
1.6
67%
1.5
69%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.203 100%
2.305 95%
2.388 92%
2.1 105%
2.23 99%
2.27 97%
CCT
7430 87%
7371 88%
8399 77%
6069 107%
6553 99%
6268 104%
6548 99%
Contrast
1307
1935

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 242.7 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9524 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.4 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7936 Points ∼55%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
14489 Points ∼100% +83%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13620 Points ∼94% +72%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
13896 Points ∼96% +75%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10128 Points ∼70% +28%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8574 Points ∼59% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼52% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7372 - 8024, n=6)
7627 Points ∼53% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=299)
4513 Points ∼31% -43%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11359 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
9231 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8453 Points ∼74% -26%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
9018 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10162 Points ∼89% -11%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9880 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10187 - 11388, n=7)
11024 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=353)
4479 Points ∼39% -61%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3537 Points ∼79%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2500 Points ∼56% -29%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2437 Points ∼54% -31%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2409 Points ∼54% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4499 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3306 Points ∼73% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼78% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3460 - 3537, n=7)
3504 Points ∼78% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (758 - 4824, n=355)
1325 Points ∼29% -63%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8342 Points ∼86%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
9430 Points ∼97% +13%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8309 Points ∼85% 0%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8701 Points ∼89% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7595 Points ∼78% -9%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9135 Points ∼94% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼93% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8342 - 11440, n=6)
9741 Points ∼100% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=349)
4937 Points ∼51% -41%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10330 Points ∼79%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
9707 Points ∼75% -6%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
10006 Points ∼77% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9750 Points ∼75% -6%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
12996 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼85% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10330 - 14439, n=6)
12230 Points ∼94% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=517)
5401 Points ∼42% -48%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3365 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3183 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3121 - 3365, n=6)
3265 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1849 - 15735, n=37)
2434 Points ∼72% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5768 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4688 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5653 - 5862, n=6)
5760 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (209 - 14536, n=37)
2303 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4978 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4242 Points ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4790 - 5012, n=6)
4923 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (260 - 14786, n=40)
1997 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4535 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3040 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3577 Points ∼79% -21%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3540 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2981 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4171 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3754 - 4535, n=6)
4244 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=363)
1813 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7108 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
5673 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5770 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
5825 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5358 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4361 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6951 - 7115, n=6)
7074 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=363)
1548 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6312 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4757 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5078 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
5094 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4551 Points ∼72% -28%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4317 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5913 - 6312, n=6)
6156 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=366)
1445 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4462 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3763 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3570 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3532 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4164 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3788 - 4462, n=5)
4206 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=377)
1782 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10300 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8345 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8451 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8389 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5767 Points ∼56% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10028 - 10420, n=5)
10268 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=377)
2118 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7980 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6568 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6482 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6425 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5313 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7449 - 7980, n=5)
7771 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7980, n=378)
1805 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4262 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3637 Points ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3408 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3557 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2854 Points ∼67% -33%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3849 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3037 - 4262, n=6)
3872 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4262, n=439)
1740 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6362 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
5174 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5220 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
5113 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5176 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4400 Points ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6233 - 6362, n=6)
6312 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=441)
1280 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5734 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4730 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4668 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4660 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4383 Points ∼76% -24%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4264 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5104 - 5734, n=6)
5521 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=449)
1225 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4240 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3668 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3443 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3587 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3828 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3614 - 4240, n=5)
3968 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4240, n=471)
1645 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9983 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8243 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8312 Points ∼83% -17%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8006 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5431 Points ∼54% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (9653 - 10008, n=5)
9890 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=471)
1735 Points ∼17% -83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7673 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6454 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6324 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6285 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4969 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7166 - 7673, n=5)
7422 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7673, n=479)
1491 Points ∼19% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
45072 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
37475 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31384 Points ∼70% -30%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35578 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
31297 Points ∼69% -31%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31483 Points ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼56% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (25339 - 45072, n=5)
34043 Points ∼76% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=631)
13525 Points ∼30% -70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
110432 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
80283 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82423 Points ∼75% -25%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
80333 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
71292 Points ∼65% -35%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
63469 Points ∼57% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (106534 - 110432, n=5)
107520 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3585 - 162695, n=631)
19546 Points ∼18% -82%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
83518 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
64029 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60543 Points ∼72% -28%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
62783 Points ∼75% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55524 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
51779 Points ∼62% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (62225 - 83518, n=5)
71771 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4164 - 83518, n=632)
16333 Points ∼20% -80%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
150 fps ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
151 fps ∼90% -10%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
152 fps ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
143 fps ∼86% -14%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
138 fps ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (162 - 167, n=7)
166 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=659)
34.1 fps ∼20% -80%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼67%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
89 fps ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
89 fps ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (60 - 91, n=7)
64.6 fps ∼73% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=662)
26.5 fps ∼30% -56%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
102 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
83 fps ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82 fps ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
83 fps ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
85 fps ∼83% -17%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
91 fps ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (97 - 102, n=7)
100 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=578)
18.7 fps ∼18% -82%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼80%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
75 fps ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼79% -2%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
56 fps ∼75% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼71% -12%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
59 fps ∼79% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼80% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (55 - 85, n=7)
62.4 fps ∼83% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=583)
17.4 fps ∼23% -71%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
71 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
60 fps ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼85% -15%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
61 fps ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼75% -25%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
56 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (41 - 71, n=7)
65.6 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=440)
15.5 fps ∼22% -78%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼98%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
54 fps ∼93% -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
53 fps ∼91% -7%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
37 fps ∼64% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
30 fps ∼52% -47%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
47 fps ∼81% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (36 - 58, n=7)
49.7 fps ∼86% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=443)
14.8 fps ∼26% -74%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
25 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
21 fps ∼84% -16%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
15 fps ∼60% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼64% -36%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20 fps ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (15 - 26, n=6)
23.2 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=143)
8.76 fps ∼35% -65%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
14 fps ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
14 fps ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (16 - 17, n=7)
16.4 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=143)
5.99 fps ∼35% -65%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
34 fps ∼89% -11%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
23 fps ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
25 fps ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (23 - 38, n=6)
35 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=145)
13 fps ∼34% -66%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼98%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
37 fps ∼84% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
44 fps ∼100% +2%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
36 fps ∼82% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼93% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (40.7 - 43, n=7)
42 fps ∼95% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=144)
14.4 fps ∼33% -67%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35 fps ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼83% -17%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35 fps ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
35 fps ∼83% -17%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
33 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (41 - 42, n=7)
41.9 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=369)
10.4 fps ∼25% -75%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼95%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
31 fps ∼82% -14%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼82% -14%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
22 fps ∼58% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼61% -36%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
27 fps ∼71% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (21 - 38, n=7)
32.4 fps ∼85% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=373)
9.41 fps ∼25% -74%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
33.05 fps ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
33.04 (min: 9.22, max: 75.78) fps ∼88% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
27.02 (min: 2.8, max: 80.83) fps ∼72% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37.41 fps ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (33.1 - 37.4, n=3)
35.9 fps ∼96% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.09 - 651, n=60)
25.9 fps ∼69% -22%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.16 (min: 8.36, max: 61.33) fps ∼84%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
28.46 (min: 9.24, max: 54.37) fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32.2 fps ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22.7 - 32.2, n=2)
27.5 fps ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.62 - 606, n=55)
23 fps ∼71%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
24.54 fps ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.35 (min: 8.77, max: 77.53) fps ∼100% +56%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
30.67 (min: 5.93, max: 132.19) fps ∼80% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35.63 fps ∼93% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (24.5 - 36.3, n=3)
32.2 fps ∼84% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 739, n=55)
27.6 fps ∼72% +12%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
371562 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
299878 Points ∼80% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
290397 Points ∼77% -22%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
285952 Points ∼76% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
328111 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
316199 Points ∼84% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (217967 - 380913, n=7)
349259 Points ∼93% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 380913, n=260)
127050 Points ∼34% -66%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4486 Score ∼89%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5020 Score ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score ∼99% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4486 - 4969, n=3)
4806 Score ∼96% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (552 - 5025, n=57)
1909 Score ∼38% -57%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1264 Points ∼90%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
1336 Points ∼95% +6%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1243 Points ∼88% -2%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
1226 Points ∼87% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1385 Points ∼98% +10%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1409 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼98% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1264 - 1415, n=6)
1373 Points ∼97% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=590)
734 Points ∼52% -42%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8125 Points ∼88%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
7957 Points ∼86% -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5846 Points ∼63% -28%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8001 Points ∼86% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7361 Points ∼79% -9%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7758 Points ∼84% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8125 - 9477, n=6)
9165 Points ∼99% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=590)
1889 Points ∼20% -77%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3560 Points ∼67%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
5296 Points ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2871 Points ∼54% -19%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3906 Points ∼74% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4570 Points ∼86% +28%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5210 Points ∼98% +46%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼76% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3560 - 6661, n=6)
5013 Points ∼95% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6661, n=590)
1413 Points ∼27% -60%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5993 Points ∼70%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8613 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7105 Points ∼82% +19%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8120 Points ∼94% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7476 Points ∼87% +25%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8572 Points ∼100% +43%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼98% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5993 - 9143, n=6)
8421 Points ∼98% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=590)
2799 Points ∼32% -53%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3847 Points ∼80%
Asus ROG Phone
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4693 Points ∼98% +22%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3489 Points ∼73% -9%
Razer Phone 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4200 Points ∼88% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4320 Points ∼90% +12%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4701 Points ∼98% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼96% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3847 - 5314, n=6)
4791 Points ∼100% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=594)
1389 Points ∼29% -64%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1075 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1927 Points ∼100% +79%
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1627 Points ∼84% +51%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points ∼73% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1075 - 1425, n=3)
1305 Points ∼68% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=98)
701 Points ∼36% -35%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
60.469 Points ∼100% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 63.1, n=5)
57.4 Points ∼95% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼95% +26%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 74)
48.929 Points ∼81% +7%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
45.538 Points ∼75%
Average of class Smartphone (14.7 - 108, n=70)
29 Points ∼48% -36%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
67.8 runs/min ∼100% +45%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼97% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (46.7 - 67.9, n=4)
60.5 runs/min ∼89% +30%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 74)
54.1 runs/min ∼80% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
54 runs/min ∼80% +16%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
46.7 runs/min ∼69%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=64)
33 runs/min ∼49% -29%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
122 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼89% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (94 - 114, n=7)
107 Points ∼88% +14%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
103 Points ∼84% +10%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
96 Points ∼79% +2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
94 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
90 Points ∼74% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=124)
62.7 Points ∼51% -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25051, n=7)
22464 Points ∼92% +32%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
22447 Points ∼91% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20286 Points ∼83% +19%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
18275 Points ∼74% +7%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
17067 Points ∼70% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
17011 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
13663 Points ∼56% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=651)
6118 Points ∼25% -64%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=671)
10898 ms * ∼100% -331%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
2528.6 ms * ∼23%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
2287 ms * ∼21% +10%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
2282.6 ms * ∼21% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1873 - 2611, n=6)
2211 ms * ∼20% +13%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
2154 ms * ∼20% +15%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
2009.1 ms * ∼18% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1924.2 ms * ∼18% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼17% +26%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Black Shark 2Asus ROG PhoneXiaomi Black SharkRazer Phone 2Samsung Galaxy S10Huawei P30 ProXiaomi Mi 9Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
130%
85%
-7%
-1%
148%
162%
53%
-54%
Random Write 4KB
25
152.03
508%
114.1
356%
23.99
-4%
24.44
-2%
159.22
537%
165.32
561%
81.1 (18.2 - 250, n=33)
224%
19.3 (0.14 - 250, n=701)
-23%
Random Read 4KB
145.18
141.61
-2%
127.2
-12%
124.31
-14%
137.4
-5%
174.36
20%
149.36
3%
137 (98.9 - 158, n=33)
-6%
43.9 (1.59 - 175, n=701)
-70%
Sequential Write 256KB
195.65
243.3
24%
199.6
2%
194.81
0%
193.24
-1%
250.82
28%
388.27
98%
198 (183 - 212, n=33)
1%
90.4 (2.99 - 392, n=701)
-54%
Sequential Read 256KB
792.81
724.68
-9%
741.5
-6%
733.22
-8%
831.94
5%
849.48
7%
666.06
-16%
742 (427 - 912, n=33)
-6%
255 (12.1 - 1468, n=701)
-68%
PUBG Mobile
010203040Tooltip
; 0.12.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)
World of Tanks Blitz
010203040506070Tooltip
; 5.10.0.372: Ø59.5 (23-61)
Subway Surfers
010203040506070Tooltip
; 1.102.0: Ø59.3 (5-61)
Hög belastning
 30.8 °C31.1 °C30.7 °C 
 30.8 °C30.2 °C30.8 °C 
 30.6 °C30.1 °C29.5 °C 
Max: 31.1 °C
Medel: 30.5 °C
29 °C29 °C29.5 °C
28.8 °C29.2 °C30.1 °C
28.8 °C29.1 °C30.1 °C
Max: 30.1 °C
Medel: 29.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  26.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.537.62531.928.13122.3244021.727.65029.230.96326.727.28020.329.410020.523.81252325.616015.643.120017.846.525016.353.931515.460.240015.965.150015.866.163013.367.580014.165.6100014.165.212501470.4160013.568.4200013.467.7250013.968.7315014.270.8400013.969500014.661.8630014.260.3800014.763.3100001562.11250014.956.91600015.357.2SPL26.479.4N0.845.6median 14.7median 63.3Delta0.97.130.328.938.129.628.530.331.433.236.632.724.625.524.124.920.524.91926.316.936.419.149.716.652.613.957.11563.514.662.712.35911.862.611.866.911.969.311.46811.270.411.570.211.371.310.96610.561.810.761.710.665.310.567.810.66710.65459.260.264.357.22479.612.514.116.810.40.544.8median 11.8median 62.72.27.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Black Shark 2Asus ROG Phone
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus ROG Phone audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.26 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.73 / 1.01 / 1.13 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.64 / 8.86 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
4000 mAh
Asus ROG Phone
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Razer Phone 2
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
Huawei P30 Pro
4200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-19%
-42%
-60%
-18%
-55%
-8%
-31%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
0.73
0.6
18%
0.8
-10%
0.6
18%
0.61
16%
0.68
7%
0.67
8%
0.88 (0.6 - 1.3, n=7)
-21%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=727)
-21%
Idle Average *
1.01
1.4
-39%
1.5
-49%
1.5
-49%
1.27
-26%
2.6
-157%
1.26
-25%
1.446 (1.01 - 2.2, n=7)
-43%
1.736 (0.6 - 6.2, n=726)
-72%
Idle Maximum *
1.13
1.7
-50%
2.3
-104%
2.6
-130%
1.3
-15%
2.77
-145%
1.29
-14%
1.914 (1.13 - 2.9, n=7)
-69%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=727)
-79%
Load Average *
3.64
3.8
-4%
4.8
-32%
7.2
-98%
6.17
-70%
3.74
-3%
3.71
-2%
4.49 (3.64 - 5.8, n=7)
-23%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=721)
-12%
Load Maximum *
8.86
10.6
-20%
10.1
-14%
12.3
-39%
8.55
3%
6.82
23%
9.3
-5%
8.65 (7.49 - 10.2, n=7)
2%
5.87 (1.2 - 14.2, n=721)
34%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
15tim 52min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12tim 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11tim 06min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 55min
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
4000 mAh
Asus ROG Phone
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Razer Phone 2
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
Huawei P30 Pro
4200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-5%
19%
5%
-7%
53%
15%
Reader / Idle
952
1110
17%
1753
84%
1630
71%
1259
32%
1966
107%
1650
73%
H.264
666
800
20%
747
12%
742
11%
842
26%
1193
79%
1008
51%
WiFi v1.3
774
533
-31%
711
-8%
531
-31%
427
-45%
838
8%
546
-29%
Load
295
216
-27%
253
-14%
206
-30%
170
-42%
344
17%
194
-34%

För

+ extremt snabb SoC
+ utmärkt spelprestanda
+ snabbt WiFi
+ dual-SIM och VoLTE
+ lyxigt och riktigt stabilt chassi
+ ljusstark AMOLED-skärm med stor färgrymdstäckning
+ kamerorna tar bra bilder i dagsljus
+ håller sig riktigt sval vid belastning

Emot

- ingen IP-certifiering
- ingen microSD-plats
- behöver en adapter för 3.5 mm ljudanslutning
- medelmåttig batteritid
- ingen trådlös laddning
- har ej NFC

Omdöme - Den bästa telefonen för gamers just nu

Recenseras: Xiaomi Black Shark 2. Recensionsex från
Recenseras: Xiaomi Black Shark 2. Recensionsex från

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 är ett måste för gamers: För tillfället är det den snabbaste speltelefonen som går att få tag på och den levererar så utmärkt prestanda att den kan spela alla moderna Android-spel utan problem i 60 FPS, även med maximala grafikinställningar. Snabbare bilduppdatering är dock inte möjlig då OLED-skärmen på Black Shark 2 bara stödjer upp till 60 Hz.

Utöver en blixtsnabb SoC får man användning för Xiaomis passiva vätskekylning, som gör det möjligt för telefonen att använda sin fulla potential även vid längre spelsessioner och som dessutom ser till att telefonen förblir bekväm att hålla i.

Om du letar efter en speltelefon är Xiaomi Black Shark 2 det bästa valet just nu.

Kontrollerna som går att köpa till och Shark Space-spelmenyn är en trevlig bonus. Shark Space låter dig aktivera Ludicrous Mode, som är lite som en jetmotor för spel – även om det för tillfället inte fanns något behöv av detta eftersom vi inte hittade något spel som led av ryckighet. Varianten med 8 GB / 128 GB kommer räcka väl till för gamers och kostar för tillfället 5.490 kronor. Men för bara 1.000 kronor mer går det också att köpa en modell med 12 GB RAM och 256 GB lagring.

Om du köper den globala versionen av Xiaomi Black Shark 2 får du Android 9 med Googles appar förinstallerade. Men det går tyvärr inte att göra något åt bristen på en microSD-kortläsare och faktum att 3.5 mm ljudanslutning bara går att få genom en USB C-adapter.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 - 05/06/2019 v6
Manuel Masiero

Design
88%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
93%
Anslutningar
44 / 60 → 74%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
94%
Skärm
83%
Spelprestanda
73 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
79 / 70 → 100%
Temperatur
94%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
77%
Medel
81%
87%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Manuel Masiero, 2019-05-30 (Update: 2019-05-30)