Test: Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Brand: Xiaomi

Den ultimata enheten för gamers? Xiaomi Black Shark 2 kommer inte nöja sig med något annat än att vara den bästa speltelefonen. Med en avancerad Snapdragon 855 SoC, passiv vätskekylning, upp till 12 GB RAM och spelkontroller som tillbehör verkar den ha en riktigt god chans att lyckas med detta. Vår recension kommer att avslöja om gamers bör skaffa en.

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 05/30/2019

Android Smartphone Touchscreen Gaming

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Black Shark Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 640

Minne

8192 MB

, LPDDR4x

Skärm

6.39 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 403 PPI, Kapacitiv, AMOLED, FHD+, glansig: ja, HDR

Hårddisk

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 113.5 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: USB-C till 3.5 mm ljudadapter, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhet, Kompass, Fingeravtrycksläsare, Liquid Cooling 3.0 System, RGB-belysning, Camera2 API Level 3, Quick Charge 4.0, aptX, aptX HD, WiFi Display, WiFi Direct, VoLTE

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.77 x 163.61 x 75.01

Batteri

4000 mAh Litiumjon

Operativsystem

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48 MP (f/1,8, 1/2", 0,8 µm) + 12 MP (teleobjektiv, f/2,2, 1,0 µm, 2x optisk zoom)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2,0, 0,9 µm

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Modulär nätadapter (Quick Charge 3.0, 5V/3A, 9V/3A, 12V/2.25A, 20V/1.35A), USB-kabel (Typ A till Typ C), USB-C till 3.5 mm ljud-adapter, SIM-verktyg, Genomskinligt hölje, Snabbstartsguide, JoyUI, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless

Vikt

205 g, Strömförsörjning: 35 g

Pris

549 Kr

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Storleksjämförelse

Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» T opp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1014 (min: 944, max: 1115) MBit/s ∼100% +73%
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	661 (min: 624, max: 683) MBit/s ∼65% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼67% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	639 (min: 612, max: 683) MBit/s ∼63% +9%
Razer Phone 2 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	604 (min: 420, max: 626) MBit/s ∼60% +3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	586 (min: 267, max: 693) MBit/s ∼58%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1368, n=534)	256 MBit/s ∼25% -56%
Xiaomi Black Shark Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	116 MBit/s ∼11% -80%
Asus ROG Phone Adreno 630, SD 845, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	103 (min: 86, max: 109) MBit/s ∼10% -82%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	670 (min: 542, max: 717) MBit/s ∼100% +27%
Huawei P30 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	541 (min: 129, max: 633) MBit/s ∼81% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	579 (min: 558, max: 592) MBit/s ∼86% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼80% +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	527 (min: 410, max: 577) MBit/s ∼79%
Razer Phone 2 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	388 (min: 234, max: 484) MBit/s ∼58% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1544, n=534)	242 MBit/s ∼36% -54%
Xiaomi Black Shark Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	117 MBit/s ∼17% -78%
Asus ROG Phone Adreno 630, SD 845, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	96.7 (min: 50, max: 106) MBit/s ∼14% -82%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø585 (267-693)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø527 (410-577)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Xiaomi Black Shark 2

Canon EOS 70D

Asus ROG Phone

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

click to load images

Xiaomi Black Shark 2

Canon EOS 70D

Asus ROG Phone

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

click to load images

Xiaomi Black Shark 2

Canon EOS 70D

Asus ROG Phone

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus


401 cd/m²	406 cd/m²	424 cd/m²
404 cd/m²	409 cd/m²	423 cd/m²
407 cd/m²	410 cd/m²	423 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 424 cd/m² Medel: 411.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.36 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 409 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21

	Xiaomi Black Shark 2 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39	Asus ROG Phone AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6	Xiaomi Black Shark IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99	Razer Phone 2 IGZO LCD, UltraMotion 120 Hz Display, 2560x1440, 5.72	Samsung Galaxy S10 OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1	Huawei P30 Pro OLED, 2340x1080, 6.47	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen		3%	-2%	26%	38%	46%	53%
Brightness middle	409	597 46%	549 34%	600 47%	701 71%	597 46%	593 45%
Brightness	412	637 55%	541 31%	577 40%	705 71%	608 48%	587 42%
Brightness Distribution	95	83 -13%	95 0%	92 -3%	98 3%	89 -6%	94 -1%
Black Level *			0.42	0.31
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	5.2	5.12 2%	6.08 -17%	3.43 34%	3.7 29%	2.2 58%	0.9 83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	8.9	10.9 -22%	10.69 -20%	6.36 29%	10.3 -16%	3.6 60%	2 78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	4.8	7.3 -52%	6.6 -38%	4.4 8%	1.4 71%	1.6 67%	1.5 69%
Gamma	2.21 ^100%	2.203 ^100%	2.305 ^95%	2.388 ^92%	2.1 ^105%	2.23 ^99%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	7430 ^87%	7371 ^88%	8399 ^77%	6069 ^107%	6553 ^99%	6268 ^104%	6548 ^99%
Contrast			1307	1935

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

242.7 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18284 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7936 Points ∼55%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	14489 Points ∼100% +83%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13620 Points ∼94% +72%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	13896 Points ∼96% +75%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10128 Points ∼70% +28%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8574 Points ∼59% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points ∼52% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7372 - 8024, n=12)	7629 Points ∼53% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=347)	4800 Points ∼33% -40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	11359 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	9231 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8453 Points ∼74% -26%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	9018 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10162 Points ∼89% -11%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9880 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10187 - 11388, n=14)	10955 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 13356, n=409)	4894 Points ∼43% -57%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3537 Points ∼79%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	2500 Points ∼56% -29%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2437 Points ∼54% -31%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	2409 Points ∼54% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4499 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3306 Points ∼73% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points ∼78% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3406 - 3537, n=14)	3480 Points ∼77% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4824, n=409)	1489 Points ∼33% -58%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	8342 Points ∼86%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	9430 Points ∼97% +13%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8309 Points ∼86% 0%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8701 Points ∼90% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7595 Points ∼78% -9%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9135 Points ∼94% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points ∼93% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8342 - 11440, n=19)	9710 Points ∼100% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 12879, n=465)	5692 Points ∼59% -32%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	10330 Points ∼79%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	9707 Points ∼75% -6%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	10006 Points ∼77% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9750 Points ∼75% -6%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	12996 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points ∼85% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10330 - 14439, n=19)	12161 Points ∼94% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 15193, n=625)	6205 Points ∼48% -40%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3365 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3183 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3288 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2104 - 3452, n=19)	3050 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1740 - 4057, n=126)	2614 Points ∼78% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5768 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4688 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5723 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4236 - 5884, n=19)	5612 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (203 - 8783, n=126)	2843 Points ∼49% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4978 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4242 Points ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4914 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3800 - 5012, n=19)	4718 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (253 - 6618, n=126)	2558 Points ∼51% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4535 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3040 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3577 Points ∼79% -21%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3540 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2981 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4171 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1934 - 5024, n=19)	3937 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5728, n=470)	2117 Points ∼47% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7108 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	5673 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5770 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	5825 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5358 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4361 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5184 - 7148, n=19)	6802 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 9467, n=470)	1987 Points ∼28% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6312 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4757 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5078 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	5094 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4551 Points ∼72% -28%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4317 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3969 - 6404, n=19)	5820 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 8154, n=471)	1844 Points ∼29% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4462 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3763 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3570 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3532 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4164 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2345 - 4703, n=18)	3892 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5718, n=500)	2028 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	10300 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8345 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8451 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8389 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5767 Points ∼56% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6358 - 10420, n=18)	9569 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 20154, n=500)	2636 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7980 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	6568 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6482 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	6425 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5313 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5268 - 8141, n=18)	7186 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 10699, n=500)	2215 Points ∼28% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4262 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3637 Points ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3408 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3557 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2854 Points ∼67% -33%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3849 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2705 - 4612, n=19)	3976 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 5209, n=550)	2009 Points ∼47% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6362 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	5174 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5220 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	5113 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5176 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4400 Points ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5663 - 6362, n=19)	6242 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 8469, n=550)	1658 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5734 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4730 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4668 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4660 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4383 Points ∼76% -24%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4264 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4556 - 5747, n=19)	5522 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 7305, n=551)	1585 Points ∼28% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4240 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3668 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3443 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3587 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3828 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3001 - 4618, n=18)	3925 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 5054, n=592)	1875 Points ∼44% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	9983 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8243 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8312 Points ∼83% -17%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8006 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5431 Points ∼54% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6122 - 10008, n=18)	9272 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 12494, n=591)	2163 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7673 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	6454 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6324 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	6285 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4969 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5251 - 7820, n=18)	7091 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 9492, n=594)	1867 Points ∼24% -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	45072 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	37475 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31384 Points ∼70% -30%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	35578 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	31297 Points ∼69% -31%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	31483 Points ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points ∼56% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (20636 - 45072, n=18)	32923 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 57583, n=740)	14957 Points ∼33% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	110432 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	80283 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	82423 Points ∼75% -25%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	80333 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	71292 Points ∼65% -35%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	63469 Points ∼57% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (97354 - 110432, n=17)	105781 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 209431, n=738)	24584 Points ∼22% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	83518 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	64029 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60543 Points ∼72% -28%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	62783 Points ∼75% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	55524 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	51779 Points ∼62% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (55771 - 83518, n=17)	70036 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 110468, n=738)	19553 Points ∼23% -77%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	167 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	150 fps ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	151 fps ∼90% -10%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	152 fps ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	143 fps ∼86% -14%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	138 fps ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (85 - 167, n=20)	153 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=753)	42.3 fps ∼25% -75%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps ∼67%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	89 fps ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼67% 0%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	89 fps ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	60 fps ∼67% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	60 fps ∼67% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (59 - 91, n=20)	63.4 fps ∼71% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 120, n=762)	29.9 fps ∼34% -50%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	102 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	83 fps ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	82 fps ∼80% -20%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	83 fps ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	85 fps ∼83% -17%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	91 fps ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (50 - 102, n=20)	92.3 fps ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 175, n=658)	24.8 fps ∼24% -76%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps ∼80%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	75 fps ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps ∼79% -2%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	56 fps ∼75% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps ∼71% -12%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	59 fps ∼79% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼80% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (46 - 85, n=20)	59.6 fps ∼79% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 115, n=666)	21.2 fps ∼28% -65%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	71 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	60 fps ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼85% -15%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	61 fps ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps ∼75% -25%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	56 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (35 - 71, n=20)	62 fps ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=521)	20 fps ∼28% -72%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	57 fps ∼98%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	54 fps ∼93% -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	53 fps ∼91% -7%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	37 fps ∼64% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	30 fps ∼52% -47%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	47 fps ∼81% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (27 - 58, n=20)	47.7 fps ∼82% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=523)	18.4 fps ∼32% -68%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	25 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	21 fps ∼84% -16%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	15 fps ∼60% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps ∼64% -36%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	20 fps ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (11 - 26, n=19)	21.3 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=263)	10.8 fps ∼43% -57%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	17 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	14 fps ∼82% -18%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	14 fps ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	14 fps ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8.5 - 24, n=20)	16.3 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 68, n=261)	7.66 fps ∼45% -55%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	38 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	34 fps ∼89% -11%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	23 fps ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	25 fps ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	32 fps ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17 - 38, n=19)	33.2 fps ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=267)	16.1 fps ∼42% -58%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	43 fps ∼98%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	37 fps ∼84% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	44 fps ∼100% +2%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	36 fps ∼82% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps ∼93% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22 - 43, n=20)	40 fps ∼91% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 165, n=266)	18.1 fps ∼41% -58%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	42 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	35 fps ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps ∼83% -17%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	35 fps ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	35 fps ∼83% -17%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	33 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22 - 43, n=20)	39.2 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 73, n=446)	13.6 fps ∼32% -68%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	36 fps ∼95%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	31 fps ∼82% -14%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31 fps ∼82% -14%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	22 fps ∼58% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps ∼61% -36%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	27 fps ∼71% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (16 - 41, n=20)	31.7 fps ∼83% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=450)	12.1 fps ∼32% -66%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	33.05 fps ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	33.04 (min: 9.22, max: 75.78) fps ∼88% 0%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	27.02 (min: 2.8, max: 80.83) fps ∼72% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37.41 fps ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (33.1 - 37.4, n=3)	35.9 fps ∼96% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)	19.2 fps ∼51% -42%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	27.16 (min: 8.36, max: 61.33) fps ∼84%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	28.46 (min: 9.24, max: 54.37) fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	32.2 fps ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22.7 - 32.2, n=2)	27.5 fps ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone (1.57 - 63, n=63)	16.1 fps ∼50%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	24.54 fps ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	38.35 (min: 8.77, max: 77.53) fps ∼100% +56%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	30.67 (min: 5.93, max: 132.19) fps ∼80% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35.63 fps ∼93% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (24.5 - 36.3, n=3)	32.2 fps ∼84% +31%
Average of class Smartphone (1.88 - 71.6, n=61)	20.1 fps ∼52% -18%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	371562 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	299878 Points ∼80% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	290397 Points ∼77% -22%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	285952 Points ∼76% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	328111 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	316199 Points ∼84% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (217967 - 398720, n=16)	354450 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 462516, n=297)	143610 Points ∼38% -61%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4486 Score ∼89%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5020 Score ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4964 Score ∼99% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4486 - 4969, n=3)	4806 Score ∼96% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 7649, n=80)	2601 Score ∼52% -42%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	1264 Points ∼90%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	1336 Points ∼95% +6%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1243 Points ∼88% -2%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	1226 Points ∼87% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1385 Points ∼98% +10%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1409 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points ∼98% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1076 - 1601, n=19)	1356 Points ∼96% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1745, n=688)	793 Points ∼56% -37%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	8125 Points ∼88%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	7957 Points ∼86% -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5846 Points ∼63% -28%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8001 Points ∼86% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7361 Points ∼79% -9%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	7758 Points ∼84% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8125 - 9510, n=19)	9174 Points ∼99% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=688)	2322 Points ∼25% -71%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3560 Points ∼67%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	5296 Points ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2871 Points ∼54% -19%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3906 Points ∼74% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4570 Points ∼86% +28%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5210 Points ∼98% +46%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points ∼76% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2661 - 7500, n=19)	5097 Points ∼96% +43%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 8398, n=688)	1717 Points ∼32% -52%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5993 Points ∼70%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8613 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7105 Points ∼82% +19%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8120 Points ∼94% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7476 Points ∼87% +25%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8572 Points ∼100% +43%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points ∼98% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5993 - 9143, n=19)	8539 Points ∼99% +42%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=688)	3261 Points ∼38% -46%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3847 Points ∼80%
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4693 Points ∼98% +22%
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3489 Points ∼73% -9%
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4200 Points ∼88% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4320 Points ∼90% +12%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4701 Points ∼98% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points ∼96% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3847 - 5397, n=19)	4796 Points ∼100% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6149, n=688)	1650 Points ∼34% -57%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	1075 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1927 Points ∼100% +79%
Huawei P30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1627 Points ∼84% +51%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1415 Points ∼73% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1075 - 1425, n=4)	1334 Points ∼69% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (35 - 3575, n=125)	837 Points ∼43% -22%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	60.469 Points ∼100% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=16)	58.8 Points ∼97% +29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)	57.207 Points ∼95% +26%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 74)	48.929 Points ∼81% +7%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	45.538 Points ∼75%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=152)	39 Points ∼64% -14%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	67.8 runs/min ∼100% +45%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	65.7 runs/min ∼97% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=15)	62 runs/min ∼91% +33%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 74)	54.1 runs/min ∼80% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	54 runs/min ∼80% +16%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	46.7 runs/min ∼69%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=139)	42.5 runs/min ∼63% -9%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	122 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points ∼89% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20)	105 Points ∼86% +12%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)	103 Points ∼84% +10%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)	96 Points ∼79% +2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	94 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	90 Points ∼74% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=215)	68.9 Points ∼56% -27%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=20)	23240 Points ∼95% +37%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	22447 Points ∼91% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	20286 Points ∼83% +19%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)	18275 Points ∼74% +7%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)	17067 Points ∼70% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	17011 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	13663 Points ∼56% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=746)	7440 Points ∼30% -56%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (550 - 59466, n=771)	10092 ms * ∼100% -299%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	2528.6 ms * ∼25%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	2287 ms * ∼23% +10%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)	2282.6 ms * ∼23% +10%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)	2154 ms * ∼21% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19)	2147 ms * ∼21% +15%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)	2009.1 ms * ∼20% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	1924.2 ms * ∼19% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873.2 ms * ∼19% +26%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Black Shark 2	Asus ROG Phone	Xiaomi Black Shark	Razer Phone 2	Samsung Galaxy S10	Huawei P30 Pro	Xiaomi Mi 9	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		130%	85%	-7%	-1%	148%	162%	75%	-37%
Random Write 4KB	25	152.03 508%	114.1 356%	23.99 -4%	24.44 -2%	159.22 537%	165.32 561%	98 (18.2 - 250, n=51) 292%	29.8 (0.14 - 272, n=830) 19%
Random Read 4KB	145.18	141.61 -2%	127.2 -12%	124.31 -14%	137.4 -5%	174.36 20%	149.36 3%	141 (96.8 - 179, n=51) -3%	54.4 (1.59 - 265, n=830) -63%
Sequential Write 256KB	195.65	243.3 24%	199.6 2%	194.81 0%	193.24 -1%	250.82 28%	388.27 98%	222 (182 - 503, n=51) 13%	114 (2.99 - 750, n=830) -42%
Sequential Read 256KB	792.81	724.68 -9%	741.5 -6%	733.22 -8%	831.94 5%	849.48 7%	666.06 -16%	761 (427 - 961, n=51) -4%	313 (12.1 - 1781, n=830) -61%

PUBG Mobile

; 0.12.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)

World of Tanks Blitz

; 5.10.0.372: Ø59.5 (23-61)

Subway Surfers

; 1.102.0: Ø59.3 (5-61)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


30.8 °C	31.1 °C	30.7 °C
30.8 °C	30.2 °C	30.8 °C
30.6 °C	30.1 °C	29.5 °C

Max: 31.1 °C
Medel: 30.5 °C


29 °C	29 °C	29.5 °C
28.8 °C	29.2 °C	30.1 °C
28.8 °C	29.1 °C	30.1 °C

Max: 30.1 °C
Medel: 29.3 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 26.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Asus ROG Phone audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.02 / 0.26 Watt
Låg belastning	0.73 / 1.01 / 1.13 Watt
Hög belastning	3.64 / 8.86 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Black Shark 2 4000 mAh	Asus ROG Phone 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh	Razer Phone 2 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh	Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-19%	-42%	-60%	-18%	-55%	-8%	-33%	-31%
Idle Minimum *	0.73	0.6 18%	0.8 -10%	0.6 18%	0.61 16%	0.68 7%	0.67 8%	0.939 (0.58 - 1.96, n=19) -29%	0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=842) -21%
Idle Average *	1.01	1.4 -39%	1.5 -49%	1.5 -49%	1.27 -26%	2.6 -157%	1.26 -25%	1.506 (0.85 - 2.8, n=19) -49%	1.748 (0.6 - 6.2, n=841) -73%
Idle Maximum *	1.13	1.7 -50%	2.3 -104%	2.6 -130%	1.3 -15%	2.77 -145%	1.29 -14%	1.799 (1 - 2.9, n=19) -59%	2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=842) -80%
Load Average *	3.64	3.8 -4%	4.8 -32%	7.2 -98%	6.17 -70%	3.74 -3%	3.71 -2%	4.61 (3.64 - 5.8, n=19) -27%	4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=836) -12%
Load Maximum *	8.86	10.6 -20%	10.1 -14%	12.3 -39%	8.55 3%	6.82 23%	9.3 -5%	9.04 (7.49 - 11.9, n=19) -2%	6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=836) 32%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		15tim 52min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		12tim 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11tim 06min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 55min

	Xiaomi Black Shark 2 4000 mAh	Asus ROG Phone 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh	Razer Phone 2 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh	Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh
Battery Runtime		-5%	19%	5%	-7%	53%	15%
Reader / Idle	952	1110 17%	1753 84%	1630 71%	1259 32%	1966 107%	1650 73%
H.264	666	800 20%	747 12%	742 11%	842 26%	1193 79%	1008 51%
WiFi v1.3	774	533 -31%	711 -8%	531 -31%	427 -45%	838 8%	546 -29%
Load	295	216 -27%	253 -14%	206 -30%	170 -42%	344 17%	194 -34%

För

+ extremt snabb SoC

+ utmärkt spelprestanda

+ snabbt WiFi

+ dual-SIM och VoLTE

+ lyxigt och riktigt stabilt chassi

+ ljusstark AMOLED-skärm med stor färgrymdstäckning

+ kamerorna tar bra bilder i dagsljus

+ håller sig riktigt sval vid belastning

Emot

- ingen IP-certifiering

- ingen microSD-plats

- behöver en adapter för 3.5 mm ljudanslutning

- medelmåttig batteritid

- ingen trådlös laddning

- har ej NFC

Omdöme - Den bästa telefonen för gamers just nu

Recenseras: Xiaomi Black Shark 2. Recensionsex från

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 är ett måste för gamers: För tillfället är det den snabbaste speltelefonen som går att få tag på och den levererar så utmärkt prestanda att den kan spela alla moderna Android-spel utan problem i 60 FPS, även med maximala grafikinställningar. Snabbare bilduppdatering är dock inte möjlig då OLED-skärmen på Black Shark 2 bara stödjer upp till 60 Hz.

Utöver en blixtsnabb SoC får man användning för Xiaomis passiva vätskekylning, som gör det möjligt för telefonen att använda sin fulla potential även vid längre spelsessioner och som dessutom ser till att telefonen förblir bekväm att hålla i.

Om du letar efter en speltelefon är Xiaomi Black Shark 2 det bästa valet just nu.

Kontrollerna som går att köpa till och Shark Space-spelmenyn är en trevlig bonus. Shark Space låter dig aktivera Ludicrous Mode, som är lite som en jetmotor för spel – även om det för tillfället inte fanns något behöv av detta eftersom vi inte hittade något spel som led av ryckighet. Varianten med 8 GB / 128 GB kommer räcka väl till för gamers och kostar för tillfället 5.490 kronor. Men för bara 1.000 kronor mer går det också att köpa en modell med 12 GB RAM och 256 GB lagring.

Om du köper den globala versionen av Xiaomi Black Shark 2 får du Android 9 med Googles appar förinstallerade. Men det går tyvärr inte att göra något åt bristen på en microSD-kortläsare och faktum att 3.5 mm ljudanslutning bara går att få genom en USB C-adapter.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 - 2019-05-0605/06/2019 v6^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Design

88%

Tangentbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Mus

93%

Anslutningar

44 / 60 → 74%

Vikt

88%

Batteri

94%

Skärm

83%

Spelprestanda

73 / 63 → 100%

Programprestanda

79 / 70 → 100%

Temperatur

94%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

75 / 91 → 82%

Camera

77%

Medel

81%

87%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Linked Articles

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Black Shark Serie)

Test

•

Test: Xiaomi Black Shark Smart...