Notebookcheck

Test: Razer Phone 2 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Inge Schwabe, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 12/03/2018

Spelet har börjat. Razer är redo för runda två. Som en efterföljare till sin tidigare speltelefon som helt enkelt heter Phone släpper de - överraskande nog - Phone 2. Bli dock inte lurad av det tråkiga namnet: Phone 2 är allt annat än tråkig. Låt oss ta en titt på vad denna splitter nya speltelefon kan göra och vilka svagheter den har.

Razer Phone 2 (Phone Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Octa-Core, 64 Bit
Minne
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Skärm
5.72 tum 19,5:9, 2560 x 1440 pixlar 513 PPI, kapacitiv tryckkänslig, 10 punkters multitouch, 120 Hz bilduppdatering, IGZO LCD, UltraMotion 120 Hz Display, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 48 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: kombinerad 3.5 mm anslutning för hörlurar och mikrofon via 24-bit USB-C DAC, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 1 TB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: närhetssensor, accelerometer, kompass, gyroskop, stegräknare
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850/900/1,800/1,900, WCDMA: 1/2/3/4/5/8, FDD-LTE: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/14/17/18/19/20/26/28/29/30/32/66/71, CAT18, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.5 x 158.5 x 78.99
Batteri
15.2 Wh, 4000 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix vidvinkel (12 MP, f/1.75, OIS) + teleobjektiv (12 MP, f/2.6), 4K-video
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Övrigt
Högtalare: stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, modulär nätadapter, USB-C kabel, 24-bit USB-C DAC, SIM-verktyg, snabbstartsguide, säkerhets och garanti-information, Nova-Launcher, ChromaKit, Dolby Atmos, Razer Cortex, Game-Booster, Theme store, 24 Månader Garanti, IP67, Qualcomm QuickCharge 4.0+, trådlös laddning, meddelanden via Razer Chroma RGB logo, LTE CAT18, Huvud SAR: 0.508 W/kg, Kropp SAR: 1.493 W/kg
Vikt
219 g, Strömförsörjning: 94 g
Pris
849 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
665 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼94% +3%
Razer Phone 2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
604 (min: 420, max: 626) MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=302)
210 MBit/s ∼32% -65%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
116 MBit/s ∼17% -81%
Asus ROG Phone
Adreno 630, 845, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
103 (min: 86, max: 109) MBit/s ∼15% -83%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 MBit/s ∼100% +70%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼91% +55%
Razer Phone 2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
388 (min: 234, max: 484) MBit/s ∼59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=302)
205 MBit/s ∼31% -47%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
117 MBit/s ∼18% -70%
Asus ROG Phone
Adreno 630, 845, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
96.7 (min: 50, max: 106) MBit/s ∼15% -75%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630Tooltip
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø610 (568-626)
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø103 (86-109)
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø390 (269-484)
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø95.2 (50-106)
Garmin Edge 520 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 - Bro
Garmin Edge 520 - Bro
Garmin Edge 520 - Skog
Garmin Edge 520 - Skog
Razer Phone 2 - Översikt
Razer Phone 2 - Översikt
Razer Phone 2 - Bro
Razer Phone 2 - Bro
Razer Phone 2 - Skog
Razer Phone 2 - Skog
Huvudkamera
Huvudkamera
Huvudkamera - Porträttläge
Huvudkamera - Porträttläge
Huvudkamera - Standard
Huvudkamera - 2x Tele

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Referenskort
Referenskort
Referenskortet i detalj
Referenskortet i detalj
557
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
585
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
578
cd/m²
574
cd/m²
588
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 601 cd/m² Medel: 576.9 cd/m² Minimum: 8.9 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 600 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1935:1 (Svärta: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.43 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
97.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.388
Razer Phone 2
IGZO LCD, UltraMotion 120 Hz Display, 2560x1440, 5.72
Razer Phone 2017
IGZO LCD, 120 Hz, Wide Color Gamut, 1440x2560, 5.72
Asus ROG Phone
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Xiaomi Black Shark
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Screen
-5%
-31%
31%
-34%
Brightness middle
600
436
-27%
597
0%
656
9%
549
-8%
Brightness
577
417
-28%
637
10%
659
14%
541
-6%
Brightness Distribution
92
92
0%
83
-10%
88
-4%
95
3%
Black Level *
0.31
0.16
48%
0.42
-35%
Contrast
1935
2725
41%
1307
-32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.43
3.88
-13%
5.12
-49%
1.7
50%
6.08
-77%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.36
7.96
-25%
10.9
-71%
2.8
56%
10.69
-68%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.4
5.8
-32%
7.3
-66%
1.7
61%
6.6
-50%
Gamma
2.388 92%
2.45 90%
2.203 100%
1.998 110%
2.305 95%
CCT
6069 107%
7657 85%
7371 88%
6487 100%
8399 77%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2451 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2451 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2451 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8964 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
13896 Points ∼96%
Razer Phone 2017
7931 Points ∼55% -43%
Asus ROG Phone
14489 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Black Shark
13620 Points ∼94% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3
13194 Points ∼91% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=19)
13635 Points ∼94% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=196)
4525 Points ∼31% -67%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
9018 Points ∼80%
Razer Phone 2017
6742 Points ∼60% -25%
Asus ROG Phone
9231 Points ∼82% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11244 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8453 Points ∼75% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ3
7934 Points ∼71% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=21)
8655 Points ∼77% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=246)
4306 Points ∼38% -52%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
2409 Points ∼50%
Razer Phone 2017
1942 Points ∼41% -19%
Asus ROG Phone
2500 Points ∼52% +4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4774 Points ∼100% +98%
Xiaomi Black Shark
2437 Points ∼51% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
2272 Points ∼48% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=21)
2417 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=247)
1269 Points ∼27% -47%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
8701 Points ∼92%
Razer Phone 2017
7046 Points ∼75% -19%
Asus ROG Phone
9430 Points ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8309 Points ∼88% -5%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8326 - 9868, n=22)
8018 Points ∼85% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=254)
4550 Points ∼48% -48%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
10006 Points ∼87%
Razer Phone 2017
7968 Points ∼69% -20%
Asus ROG Phone
9707 Points ∼85% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3
11474 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=20)
10123 Points ∼88% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=422)
4954 Points ∼43% -50%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
3540 Points ∼94%
Razer Phone 2017
3148 Points ∼84% -11%
Asus ROG Phone
3040 Points ∼81% -14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2723 Points ∼72% -23%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3577 Points ∼95% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3764 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2223 - 3764, n=22)
3110 Points ∼83% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (2386 - 4439, n=276)
1707 Points ∼45% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
5825 Points ∼100%
Razer Phone 2017
4490 Points ∼77% -23%
Asus ROG Phone
5673 Points ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4828 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5770 Points ∼99% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
5810 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4209 - 8206, n=22)
5494 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=276)
1467 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
5094 Points ∼98%
Razer Phone 2017
4101 Points ∼79% -19%
Asus ROG Phone
4757 Points ∼92% -7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4121 Points ∼79% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5078 Points ∼98% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3
5184 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5189, n=22)
4646 Points ∼90% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1012 - 5189, n=279)
1361 Points ∼26% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
3532 Points ∼94%
Razer Phone 2017
3189 Points ∼85% -10%
Asus ROG Phone
3763 Points ∼100% +7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2961 Points ∼79% -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3570 Points ∼95% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3672 Points ∼98% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=21)
3081 Points ∼82% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=291)
1687 Points ∼45% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
8389 Points ∼81%
Razer Phone 2017
6475 Points ∼62% -23%
Asus ROG Phone
8345 Points ∼80% -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
10374 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8451 Points ∼81% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
8369 Points ∼81% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=21)
7720 Points ∼74% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=291)
2071 Points ∼20% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
6425 Points ∼96%
Razer Phone 2017
5269 Points ∼79% -18%
Asus ROG Phone
6568 Points ∼99% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
6667 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Black Shark
6482 Points ∼97% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
6517 Points ∼98% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4054 - 6568, n=21)
5771 Points ∼87% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=292)
1734 Points ∼26% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
3557 Points ∼96%
Razer Phone 2017
3157 Points ∼85% -11%
Asus ROG Phone
3637 Points ∼98% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3027 Points ∼82% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3408 Points ∼92% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3703 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=21)
3268 Points ∼88% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=351)
1640 Points ∼44% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
5113 Points ∼98%
Razer Phone 2017
4049 Points ∼78% -21%
Asus ROG Phone
5174 Points ∼99% +1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3726 Points ∼71% -27%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5220 Points ∼100% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ3
5092 Points ∼98% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5241, n=21)
4944 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=351)
1187 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
4660 Points ∼99%
Razer Phone 2017
3810 Points ∼81% -18%
Asus ROG Phone
4730 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3544 Points ∼75% -24%
Xiaomi Black Shark
4668 Points ∼99% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3
4700 Points ∼99% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=21)
4424 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=359)
1134 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
3587 Points ∼98%
Razer Phone 2017
3092 Points ∼84% -14%
Asus ROG Phone
3668 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2713 Points ∼74% -24%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3443 Points ∼94% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3603 Points ∼98% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3668, n=21)
3129 Points ∼85% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=383)
1538 Points ∼42% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
8006 Points ∼96%
Razer Phone 2017
6127 Points ∼74% -23%
Asus ROG Phone
8243 Points ∼99% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
7055 Points ∼85% -12%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8312 Points ∼100% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ3
8014 Points ∼96% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=21)
7818 Points ∼94% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=383)
1632 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
6285 Points ∼97%
Razer Phone 2017
5030 Points ∼78% -20%
Asus ROG Phone
6454 Points ∼100% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
5205 Points ∼81% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark
6324 Points ∼98% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
6300 Points ∼98% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4529 - 6454, n=21)
5843 Points ∼91% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=391)
1387 Points ∼21% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
35578 Points ∼95%
Razer Phone 2017
21521 Points ∼57% -40%
Asus ROG Phone
37475 Points ∼100% +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
27717 Points ∼74% -22%
Xiaomi Black Shark
31384 Points ∼84% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ3
36794 Points ∼98% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=21)
33400 Points ∼89% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=538)
12873 Points ∼34% -64%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
80333 Points ∼50%
Razer Phone 2017
58360 Points ∼37% -27%
Asus ROG Phone
80283 Points ∼50% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
159735 Points ∼100% +99%
Xiaomi Black Shark
82423 Points ∼52% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ3
83927 Points ∼53% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 84998, n=21)
80111 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=538)
17989 Points ∼11% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
62783 Points ∼81%
Razer Phone 2017
42278 Points ∼54% -33%
Asus ROG Phone
64029 Points ∼83% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
77599 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60543 Points ∼78% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ3
65330 Points ∼84% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=21)
60990 Points ∼79% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=539)
15106 Points ∼19% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
152 fps ∼67%
Razer Phone 2017
117 fps ∼52% -23%
Asus ROG Phone
150 fps ∼66% -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
226 fps ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Black Shark
151 fps ∼67% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
152 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=22)
144 fps ∼64% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=563)
31.3 fps ∼14% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
89 fps ∼100%
Razer Phone 2017
79 fps ∼89% -11%
Asus ROG Phone
89 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ3
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=21)
62.7 fps ∼70% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=566)
24.9 fps ∼28% -72%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
83 fps ∼78%
Razer Phone 2017
43 fps ∼40% -48%
Asus ROG Phone
83 fps ∼78% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
107 fps ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Black Shark
82 fps ∼77% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
83 fps ∼78% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=21)
73 fps ∼68% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=485)
16.8 fps ∼16% -80%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
56 fps ∼75%
Razer Phone 2017
40 fps ∼53% -29%
Asus ROG Phone
75 fps ∼100% +34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
59 fps ∼79% +5%
Xiaomi Black Shark
59 fps ∼79% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ3
50 fps ∼67% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 75, n=21)
55 fps ∼73% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=488)
16 fps ∼21% -71%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
61 fps ∼88%
Razer Phone 2017
21 fps ∼30% -66%
Asus ROG Phone
60 fps ∼87% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
69.3 fps ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60 fps ∼87% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3
57 fps ∼82% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=22)
54.4 fps ∼78% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=348)
14.4 fps ∼21% -76%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
37 fps ∼63%
Razer Phone 2017
22 fps ∼37% -41%
Asus ROG Phone
54 fps ∼92% +46%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
58.9 fps ∼100% +59%
Xiaomi Black Shark
53 fps ∼90% +43%
Sony Xperia XZ3
31 fps ∼53% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 59, n=21)
46.5 fps ∼79% +26%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=351)
13.9 fps ∼24% -62%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
15 fps ∼47%
Asus ROG Phone
21 fps ∼65% +40%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
32.1 fps ∼100% +114%
Sony Xperia XZ3
14 fps ∼44% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 25, n=10)
19.8 fps ∼62% +32%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=61)
10.3 fps ∼32% -31%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
14 fps ∼86%
Asus ROG Phone
14 fps ∼86% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
16.3 fps ∼100% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ3
14 fps ∼86% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (11 - 31, n=10)
15.4 fps ∼94% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=61)
6.56 fps ∼40% -53%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
23 fps ∼49%
Asus ROG Phone
34 fps ∼72% +48%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
47 fps ∼100% +104%
Sony Xperia XZ3
21 fps ∼45% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (20 - 40, n=10)
28.5 fps ∼61% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=61)
14.5 fps ∼31% -37%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
37 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
36.8 fps ∼99%
Sony Xperia XZ3
37 fps ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (29 - 38, n=9)
35 fps ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=60)
15.9 fps ∼43%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
35 fps ∼88%
Razer Phone 2017
25 fps ∼63% -29%
Asus ROG Phone
35 fps ∼88% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
40 fps ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Black Shark
35 fps ∼88% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3
35 fps ∼88% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=21)
34 fps ∼85% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=279)
9.88 fps ∼25% -72%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
22 fps ∼71%
Razer Phone 2017
15 fps ∼48% -32%
Asus ROG Phone
31 fps ∼100% +41%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
31 fps ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Black Shark
31 fps ∼100% +41%
Sony Xperia XZ3
19 fps ∼61% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (17 - 37, n=21)
28.3 fps ∼91% +29%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=282)
8.89 fps ∼29% -60%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
285952 Points ∼94%
Razer Phone 2017
208972 Points ∼69% -27%
Asus ROG Phone
299878 Points ∼99% +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
302955 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Black Shark
290397 Points ∼96% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ3
292268 Points ∼96% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=22)
275958 Points ∼91% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=169)
118333 Points ∼39% -59%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
232418 Points ∼96%
Asus ROG Phone
242953 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Black Shark
230642 Points ∼95% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
226853 Points ∼93% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=18)
223967 Points ∼92% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=386)
76035 Points ∼31% -67%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
1226 Points ∼71%
Razer Phone 2017
1225 Points ∼71% 0%
Asus ROG Phone
1336 Points ∼77% +9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1731 Points ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Black Shark
1243 Points ∼72% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
1390 Points ∼80% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=20)
1348 Points ∼78% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=498)
698 Points ∼40% -43%
Graphics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
8001 Points ∼51%
Razer Phone 2017
6273 Points ∼40% -22%
Asus ROG Phone
7957 Points ∼51% -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
15659 Points ∼100% +96%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5846 Points ∼37% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ3
7989 Points ∼51% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=20)
7816 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=498)
1738 Points ∼11% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
3906 Points ∼74%
Razer Phone 2017
4085 Points ∼77% +5%
Asus ROG Phone
5296 Points ∼100% +36%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1815 Points ∼34% -54%
Xiaomi Black Shark
2871 Points ∼54% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ3
2317 Points ∼44% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=20)
3594 Points ∼68% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=498)
1244 Points ∼23% -68%
System (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
8120 Points ∼70%
Razer Phone 2017
5660 Points ∼48% -30%
Asus ROG Phone
8613 Points ∼74% +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11675 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Black Shark
7105 Points ∼61% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ3
8135 Points ∼70% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=20)
7657 Points ∼66% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=498)
2508 Points ∼21% -69%
Overall (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2
4200 Points ∼86%
Razer Phone 2017
3651 Points ∼75% -13%
Asus ROG Phone
4693 Points ∼96% +12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4895 Points ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3489 Points ∼71% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3804 Points ∼78% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=20)
4099 Points ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=502)
1254 Points ∼26% -70%

Legend

 
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Razer Phone 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
273.01 Points ∼100% +207%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
90.938 Points ∼33% +2%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
88.869 Points ∼33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=22)
76.9 Points ∼28% -13%
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)
63.3 Points ∼23% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=421)
36.7 Points ∼13% -59%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Points ∼0% -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points ∼100% +153%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
18275 Points ∼42% +7%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
17067 Points ∼40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=22)
15431 Points ∼36% -10%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
13663 Points ∼32% -20%
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)
12600 Points ∼29% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=556)
5550 Points ∼13% -67%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=577)
11486 ms * ∼100% -403%
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)
3476 ms * ∼30% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=22)
2874 ms * ∼25% -26%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
2287 ms * ∼20% -0%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
2282.6 ms * ∼20%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
2154 ms * ∼19% +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603.1 ms * ∼5% +74%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points ∼100% +61%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
103 Points ∼66% +7%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
96 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
90 Points ∼58% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=15)
84.5 Points ∼55% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=62)
63.6 Points ∼41% -34%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
347 Points ∼100% +32%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
266 Points ∼77% +1%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
263 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
246 Points ∼71% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (260 - 291, n=21)
233 Points ∼67% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=283)
111 Points ∼32% -58%

* ... smaller is better

Razer Phone 2Razer Phone 2017Sony Xperia XZ3Xiaomi Black SharkAverage 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-8%
-19%
95%
13%
-47%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
52.5
-16%
30.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-51%
50.2 (17.1 - 71.9, n=25)
-19%
45.4 (3.4 - 87.1, n=316)
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.4
-8%
34.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-61%
66.4 (18 - 86.6, n=25)
-23%
63.7 (8.2 - 96.5, n=316)
-26%
Random Write 4KB
23.99
14.3
-40%
22.22
-7%
114.1
376%
50.5 (8.77 - 156, n=34)
111%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=606)
-33%
Random Read 4KB
124.31
142.5
15%
135.67
9%
127.2
2%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=34)
8%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=606)
-69%
Sequential Write 256KB
194.81
202.5
4%
196.14
1%
199.6
2%
193 (133 - 229, n=34)
-1%
79.7 (2.99 - 246, n=606)
-59%
Sequential Read 256KB
733.22
732.3
0%
680.98
-7%
741.5
1%
727 (529 - 895, n=34)
-1%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=606)
-69%
Battle Bay
 InställningarVärde
 half resolution60 fps
 full resolution109 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Real Racing 3
 InställningarVärde
 high101 fps
 low60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Hög belastning
 39.7 °C39.4 °C39.8 °C 
 39.4 °C39.4 °C40.7 °C 
 38.7 °C38.9 °C39.6 °C 
Max: 40.7 °C
Medel: 39.5 °C
37.6 °C38.8 °C40.8 °C
38.3 °C38.4 °C38.9 °C
38.3 °C38.6 °C38 °C
Max: 40.8 °C
Medel: 38.6 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  42.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.331.52538.130.83128.537.94031.434.15036.634.26324.6288024.126.510020.524.81251925.816016.936.120019.150.525016.652.431513.955.44001561.350014.663.163012.364.280011.865.1100011.866.8125011.967160011.465200011.265.6250011.565315011.364.5400010.963.8500010.561.4630010.764.9800010.667.61000010.567.31250010.663.51600010.654.2SPL60.264.357.22477.1N14.116.810.40.541.3median 11.8median 63.8Delta2.2729.525.929.526.427.726.426.526.526.526.628.326.625.525.225.523.922.723.926.523.626.533.623.333.640.230.540.245.821.145.852.420.652.455.322.955.357.921.157.960.921.560.964.822.364.869.117.569.171.520.171.569.719.969.77018.27069.51669.570.715.770.771.614.871.669.614.569.666.914.266.968146867.813.867.868.913.968.966.51466.562.71462.758.613.858.681.229.381.251.51.251.5median 66.9median 17.5median 66.97.13.57.140.441.73634.540.928.533.230.441.14224.734.524.624.622.930.22038.717.545.718.849.818.951.11749.915.655.918.955.614.653.312.856.512.759.81264.31166.71168.91169.410.768.210.962.910.961.61162.711641161.911.158.111.152.862.324.877.215.60.637median 12median 58.135.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Phone 2Razer Phone 2017Apple iPhone Xs Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Phone 2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Razer Phone 2017 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone Xs Max audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.6 / 1.5 / 2.6 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 7.2 / 12.3 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Razer Phone 2
4000 mAh
Razer Phone 2017
4000 mAh
Asus ROG Phone
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-2%
21%
11%
6%
6%
12%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.83
-38%
0.6
-0%
1
-67%
0.8
-33%
0.802 (0.42 - 1.8, n=19)
-34%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=634)
-47%
Idle Average *
1.5
2.11
-41%
1.4
7%
1.4
7%
1.5
-0%
1.722 (0.67 - 2.9, n=19)
-15%
1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=633)
-15%
Idle Maximum *
2.6
2.24
14%
1.7
35%
1.7
35%
2.3
12%
2.1 (0.87 - 3.5, n=19)
19%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=634)
23%
Load Average *
7.2
4.94
31%
3.8
47%
4.6
36%
4.8
33%
4.79 (3.64 - 7.2, n=19)
33%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=628)
44%
Load Maximum *
12.3
9.08
26%
10.6
14%
6.7
46%
10.1
18%
9.2 (6.2 - 12.3, n=19)
25%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=628)
53%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
27tim 10min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8tim 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12tim 22min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 26min
Razer Phone 2
4000 mAh
Razer Phone 2017
4000 mAh
Asus ROG Phone
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
44%
-5%
9%
17%
Reader / Idle
1630
1110
-32%
1305
-20%
1753
8%
H.264
742
800
8%
801
8%
747
1%
WiFi v1.3
531
762
44%
533
0%
742
40%
711
34%
Load
206
216
5%
223
8%
253
23%

För

+ 120 Hz-skärm
+ kraftfull SoC med skaplig kylning
+ 8 GB RAM
+ utökningsbar lagring
+ unik RGB-logo
+ dual-SIM
+ DAC av hög kvalitet ingår
+ kamera med OIS
+ stereohögtalare
+ trådlös laddning
+ QuickCharge

Emot

- tung
- lite intern lagring
- rejäl infattning ovanför och under skärmen
- dålig batteritid
Recenseras: Razer Phone 2 (Phone 2)
Recenseras: Razer Phone 2 (Phone 2)

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Om du letar efter något speciellt kommer Razer Phone 2 vara perfekt, inte bara på grund av dess logo. Asus ROG Phone erbjuder något liknande, om än med en 90 Hz-skärm. På så sätt är 120 Hz-skärmen unik för Razers telefon - en exotisk kandidat på smartphonemarknaden som är beroende av att spelutvecklarna sötdjer denna unika funktion. Men det gör de - antalet spel med stöd för 120 Hz växer snabbt. Kanske till och med snabbt nog för att göra denna exotiska enhet till en speltelefons-pionjär som varje mobil gamer kommer längta efter.

Qualcomms Snapdragon 845 och 8 GB RAM är snabbt och kraftfullt, men det är varken unikt för Razer Phone 2 eller särskilt mycket snabbare eller bättre än Samsungs och Huaweis egna topp-presterande chipp. Dock kan de sistnämnda vara ännu dyrare än de 8.000 kronor som Razer ber om. Razer Phone 2:s enda brist är avsaknaden av uthållighet - om du tycker att batteritid är viktigt vill du kanske ta en titt på konkurrenterna.

På den billigare sidan av samma spektra finns Xiaomi Black Shark. En smartphone som lyckades nästan lika bra som Razer Phone 2 i våra tester men som bara kostar runt hälften så mycket. Om du insisterar på en Razer kan du också vilja ta en titt på förra årets modell, men vid skrivande stund är den bara 1.000 kronor billigare. Den saknar det sofistikerade kylsystemet, den trådlösa laddningen, IP67-certifieringen och Chroma RGB-logotypen.

I en del länder finns Razers telefoner redan tillgängliga i varianter subventionerade av teleoperatörer. Vi rekommenderar dock starkt att du tar en titt på telefon först och försäkrar dig om att den fyrkantiga formen passar dina händer och öron. Även om den inte gör den säljer dess överväldigande prestanda nästan sig själv.

Razer Phone 2 - 11/28/2018 v6
Inge Schwabe

Design
91%
Tangentbord
89 / 75 → 100%
Mus
100%
Anslutningar
53 / 60 → 88%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
65 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
76 / 70 → 100%
Temperatur
89%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
78 / 91 → 86%
Camera
82%
Medel
84%
90%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Razer Phone 2 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Inge Schwabe, 2018-12- 3 (Update: 2018-12- 3)