Notebookcheck

Test: Schenker XMG Ultra 15 (Clevo P751TM1-G) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 03/25/2018

Stationär CPU i laptopkläder. Även om dom flesta laptops kommer med fastlödda processorer och grafikkort så har XMG Ultra 15 från Schenker Technologies många utbytbara komponenter. Huruvida det är tillräckligt för att slå konkurrenterna kommer vi reda ut i den här recensionen.

Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Processor
Intel Core i5-8600K, Sockel 1151
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Kärna: 1518 MHz, Minne: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, MXM, ForceWare 391.01
Minne
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, dual-kanal, 2 av 4 platser upptagna, max. 64 GB
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), TN, Full HD, 120 Hz, G-Sync, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe, 500 GB 
, Platser: 2x M.202280 & 2x 2.5 tum
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC899 @ Intel Union Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: hörlur, mikrofon, ljud-in, ljud-ut, Kortläsare: SD,SDHC,SDXC,Mini SD,MMC,RSMMC, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, SIM-kortsplats
Nätverk
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 38 x 386 x 262
Batteri
82 Wh, 5400 mAh Litiumjon, removeable, 8 celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: FHD
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.0, Tangentbord: RGB; 3 zoner, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 330 watt nätadapter, manual, klistermärke, USB-enhet med verktyg, återställnings-DVD, DVD med drivrutiner, tillbehör till en 2.5 tums enhet, Control Center, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
3.5 kg, Strömförsörjning: 1.287 kg
Pris
2569 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
185 MB/s ∼100%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
153 MB/s ∼83% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=205)
90.1 MB/s ∼49% -51%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼43% -57%
Gigabyte P56XT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼41% -59%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
209 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207 MB/s ∼99%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=203)
109 MB/s ∼52% -47%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s ∼43% -57%
Gigabyte P56XT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s ∼43% -57%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
692 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
686 MBit/s ∼99%
Alienware 15 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼98% -1%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
677 MBit/s ∼98% -1%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
669 MBit/s ∼97% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=178)
595 MBit/s ∼86% -13%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
641 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
623 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
579 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Alienware 15 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
560 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=178)
535 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
343 MBit/s ∼54% -46%
419
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
373
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
363
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 419 cd/m² Medel: 364.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 74 %
Mitt på batteriet: 363 cd/m²
Kontrast: 626:1 (Svärta: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.7 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 2.36
ΔE Greyscale 9.26 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
AU Optronics B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), TN, 1920x1080
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5), IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte P56XT
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080
Alienware 15 R3
HPJGK_B156HTN (AUO51ED), TN, 1920x1080
Response Times
-140%
-133%
-132%
-27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
24.2 (13.4, 10.8)
36 (18, 18)
-49%
37 (16, 21)
-53%
37.2 (18.4, 18.8)
-54%
25 (12, 13)
-3%
Response Time Black / White *
8 (5.6, 2.4)
26.4 (15.2, 11.2)
-230%
25 (4, 21)
-213%
24.8 (14, 10.8)
-210%
12 (4, 8)
-50%
PWM Frequency
20830 (90)
20000 (95)
Screen
17%
20%
14%
7%
Brightness middle
363
295
-19%
310
-15%
301
-17%
386
6%
Brightness
365
274
-25%
311
-15%
280
-23%
382
5%
Brightness Distribution
74
88
19%
85
15%
87
18%
93
26%
Black Level *
0.58
0.32
45%
0.3
48%
0.32
45%
0.39
33%
Contrast
626
922
47%
1033
65%
941
50%
990
58%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.7
4.59
47%
4.82
45%
6.21
29%
10.2
-17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.91
11
15%
10.14
21%
10.78
16%
15.81
-22%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.36
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.26
4.03
56%
3.94
57%
6.08
34%
11.28
-22%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.3 96%
2.45 90%
2.31 95%
2.23 99%
CCT
9390 69%
7229 90%
6877 95%
7375 88%
11383 57%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
56
-5%
54
-8%
55
-7%
59
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
85
-7%
83
-9%
84
-8%
90
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-62% / -9%
-57% / -5%
-59% / -11%
-10% / 1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.6 ms rise
↘ 2.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
24.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.4 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8964 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU Z
CPU Z
CPU Z
CPU Z
CPU Z
GPU Z
HWiNFO
CrystalDiskMark
AS SSD Benchmark
Latenzen
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
181 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8600K
  (181 - 181, n=2)
181 Points ∼100% 0%
Alienware 15 R3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼88% -12%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼88% -12%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼88% -12%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 209, n=417)
152 Points ∼84% -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
991 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8600K
  (988 - 991, n=2)
990 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1865, n=418)
746 Points ∼75% -25%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
740 Points ∼75% -25%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
739 Points ∼75% -25%
Alienware 15 R3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
737 Points ∼74% -26%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
731 Points ∼74% -26%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
2.07 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8600K
 
2.07 Points ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.84 Points ∼89% -11%
Alienware 15 R3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼88% -12%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼88% -12%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=407)
1.68 Points ∼81% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i5-8600K
 
10.8 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
10.76 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points ∼76% -24%
Alienware 15 R3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.16 Points ∼76% -24%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼75% -24%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.13 Points ∼75% -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.2, n=508)
7.27 Points ∼67% -32%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6875
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
32863
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.07 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
10.76 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
181 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
991 Points
Hjälp
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8600K, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5618 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
 
5618 Points ∼100% 0%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5426 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
5406 Points ∼96% -4%
Alienware 15 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
5299 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
5261 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=311)
4921 Points ∼88% -12%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8600K, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5512 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
 
5512 Points ∼100% 0%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5169 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
5011 Points ∼91% -9%
Alienware 15 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
4966 Points ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
4239 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=329)
4218 Points ∼77% -23%
PCMark 10 - Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8600K, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5779 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8600K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
 
5779 Points ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
5021 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6959, n=116)
4936 Points ∼85% -15%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5512 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5618 poäng
Hjälp
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
Gigabyte P56XT
LiteOn CX2-8B256
Alienware 15 R3
 
Average Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
 
AS SSD
-27%
-62%
-1%
Score Total
3859
2574
-33%
1019
-74%
3968 (3629 - 4173, n=9)
3%
Score Write
1614
570
-65%
304
-81%
1518 (1231 - 1670, n=9)
-6%
Score Read
1513
1350
-11%
472
-69%
1645 (1493 - 1857, n=9)
9%
4K Write
137.13
117.31
-14%
104.01
-24%
142 (113 - 181, n=9)
4%
4K Read
44.75
46.35
4%
37.2
-17%
45.5 (41.5 - 49.2, n=9)
2%
Seq Write
1835.84
1066.95
-42%
288.18
-84%
1647 (1277 - 1836, n=9)
-10%
Seq Read
2757.67
1941.12
-30%
510.07
-82%
2433 (1479 - 2758, n=9)
-12%
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3344 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1847 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 369.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 325.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1830 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1641 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 44.02 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 147.7 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
18935 Points ∼100%
Alienware 15 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17675 Points ∼93% -7%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17477 Points ∼92% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (15718 - 19059, n=56)
17228 Points ∼91% -9%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17106 Points ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte P56XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
16410 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=445)
10237 Points ∼54% -46%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
24873 Points ∼100%
Alienware 15 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
22810 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
22704 Points ∼91% -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (13760 - 25604, n=58)
22405 Points ∼90% -10%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
21955 Points ∼88% -12%
Gigabyte P56XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
20576 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=518)
11863 Points ∼48% -52%
3DMark 06 Standard
32601 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
18972 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
30865 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15777 poäng
Hjälp
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8600K
65.3 fps ∼100%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
59.6 fps ∼91% -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (48.2 - 68.4, n=41)
59.1 fps ∼91% -9%
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
50.2 fps ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=222)
44.7 fps ∼68% -32%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8600K
123 fps ∼100%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
110.1 fps ∼90% -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (83 - 123, n=30)
105 fps ∼85% -15%
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
90.8 fps ∼74% -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 184, n=184)
74.9 fps ∼61% -39%
låg med. hög ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 12365.3fps
F1 2017 (2017) 137102fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 349345fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 10884fps
The Evil Within 2 (2017) 67.565.4fps
ELEX (2017) 11389.1fps
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) 125117fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 8772fps
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 146122fps
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 129122fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 135104fps
Fortnite (2018) 181131fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 65fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 87.466.5fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
32 / 33 / 35 dB(A)
Hög belastning
46 / 62 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8600K
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Alienware 15 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Noise
3%
4%
3%
-0%
off / environment *
30
32
-7%
30
-0%
30
-0%
30
-0%
Idle Minimum *
32
34
-6%
34
-6%
34
-6%
31
3%
Idle Average *
33
36
-9%
35
-6%
35
-6%
32
3%
Idle Maximum *
35
38
-9%
36
-3%
39
-11%
42
-20%
Load Average *
46
41
11%
40
13%
39
15%
49
-7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54
42
22%
48
11%
Load Maximum *
62
50
19%
46
26%
49
21%
50
19%

* ... smaller is better

 40 °C42 °C39 °C 
 41 °C41 °C39 °C 
 30 °C32 °C28 °C 
Max: 42 °C
Medel: 36.9 °C
50 °C44 °C42 °C
43 °C39 °C33 °C
27 °C29 °C27 °C
Max: 50 °C
Medel: 37.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  48 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 41.7 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-3.3 °C / -5.9 F).
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8600K
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Alienware 15 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Heat
8%
6%
-30%
-18%
Maximum Upper Side *
42
42.3
-1%
40.6
3%
65
-55%
46
-10%
Maximum Bottom *
50
40.9
18%
48.4
3%
71
-42%
51.8
-4%
Idle Upper Side *
29
28.4
2%
26.8
8%
35
-21%
36.5
-26%
Idle Bottom *
29
25.2
13%
26.4
9%
30
-3%
38.2
-32%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203839.72534.236.73129.430.74034.833.45027.427.26325.128.28026.83110026.936.212526.638.316024.151.6200276025027.663.131522.762.840020.163.350018.860.863018.560.780017.961.5100018.463.2125017.362.2160017.263.7200017.167250017.766.4315017.565.9400017.363.6500017.363.4630017.464.3800017.462.21000017.559.21250017.453.51600017.351.5SPL30.476N1.539.4median 17.7median 62.2Delta2.74.438.237.336.131.329.430.237.236.932.732.527.83828.746.328.252.225.748.224.960.32368.12572.122.271.521.269.220.371.420.276.819.479.119.478.819.480.52076.720.173.120.180.720.680.621.179.221.679.722.380.622.776.123.670.624.266.624.859.533.390.51.991.5median 21.6median 73.11.96.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker XMG Ultra 15Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.3 / 1.3 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 28 / 31 / 38 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 100 / 309 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8600K
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Alienware 15 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Power Consumption
24%
26%
36%
27%
Idle Minimum *
28
18
36%
20
29%
13
54%
19
32%
Idle Average *
31
23
26%
24
23%
17
45%
23
26%
Idle Maximum *
38
30
21%
29
24%
22
42%
29
24%
Load Average *
100
89
11%
82
18%
85
15%
85
15%
Load Maximum *
309
213
31%
193
38%
208
33%
192
38%
Witcher 3 ultra *
206
168
18%
154
25%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
3tim 40min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3tim 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3tim 06min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 59min
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8600K, 82 Wh
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-751X
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, 90 Wh
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, 75 Wh
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, 91.2 Wh
Alienware 15 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, 99 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
64%
29%
89%
35%
19%
Reader / Idle
220
502
128%
377
71%
568
158%
382
74%
331 (39 - 1174, n=595)
50%
H.264
186
295
59%
252
35%
370
99%
266
43%
244 (88 - 506, n=122)
31%
WiFi v1.3
194
332
71%
246
27%
384
98%
264
36%
250 (78 - 622, n=269)
29%
Load
119
117
-2%
98
-18%
120
1%
102
-14%
78.5 (18 - 202, n=561)
-34%

För

+ många uppgraderingsmöjligheter
+ lätt att underhålla
+ individuellt konfigurerbar
+ lagom temperaturer
+ förstklassig prestanda
+ tangentbord med RGB-bakgrundsbelysning
+ ingen bloatware
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ utmärkt ljud
+ G-Sync

Emot

- CPU-Turbo är inaktiverad i krävande 3D-applikationer
- riktigt tjockt och tungt hölje
- energikrävande
- TN-panel med brister
- medioker fläktkontroll
- dålig batteritid
The XMG Ultra 15, provided courtesy of: Schenker Technologies
The XMG Ultra 15, provided courtesy of: Schenker Technologies

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Schenker XMG Ultra 15 ärver styrkorna och svagheterna hos sitt syskon på 17 tum, XMG Ultra 17. I vårt tycke förtjänar detta lättservade hölje mycket beröm (både CPU och GPU kan i teorin bytas ut!). Den kan ställas in utförligt vid beställning med Schenkers onlineverktyg för konfigurering. Inmatningsenheterna, ljudkvaliteten och portarna (Thunderbolt 3) lever alla upp till XMG:s prislapp.

Men den G-Sync kapabla 120 Hz-skärmen lämnar ett ganska blandat intryck. Bra ljusstyrka och kort responstid kan knappast tvätta bort känslan av besvikelse som lämnas kvar av den dåliga färgnoggrannheten, bakgrundsbelysningens mediokra enhetlighet, dom dåliga betraktningsvinklarna och den aningen höga svärtan.

Den största punkten för kritik vi har rör fläktljudet. Trots det tjocka höljet så producerar denna 15-tummare mycket ljud under spelsessioner. Den tenderar också att producera en hel del onödigt ljud när den arbetar på mindre uppgifter. Eftersom processorn eller grafikkortet aldrig når kritiska temperaturer så finns det en del svängrum för en tystare kyllösning. För att uppnå det kan man förstås justera fläkthastigheten manuellt via Control Center-verktyget. Den blygsamma batteritiden är en annan anledning till att XMG Ultra 15 inte får ett "A" från oss.

Men om man tar alla aspekter i beaktande så ser man att XMG Ultra 15 står sig ganska bra mot konkurrenter såsom Acer Predator 15MSI GT62VR 7RE och Alienware 15 R3.

Schenker XMG Ultra 15 - 03/05/2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Design
75 / 98 → 77%
Tangentbord
83%
Mus
81%
Anslutningar
76 / 81 → 94%
Vikt
53 / 10-66 → 77%
Batteri
69%
Skärm
80%
Spelprestanda
98%
Programprestanda
99%
Temperatur
87 / 95 → 92%
Ljudnivå
62 / 90 → 69%
Audio
80%
Medel
79%
86%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Schenker XMG Ultra 15 (Clevo P751TM1-G) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Florian Glaser, 2018-03-25 (Update: 2018-03-25)