Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy S8+ (Plus, SM-G955F) (sammanfattning)

Daniel Schmidt, 05/25/2017

Störst i galaxen. Samsung har inte kompromissat med sitt nya flaggskepp Galaxy S8+ (Plus). Den har en utmärkt skärm med ett nytt bildförhållande och en bekväm design. Det är svårt att kritisera den nya jätteluren från Korea.

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Galaxy Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G71 MP20, Kärna: 850 MHz
Minne
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Skärm
6.2 tum 2.06:1, 2960x1440 pixlar 531 PPI, kapacitiv pekskärm, 10 beröringspunkter, Infinity Display, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, Super AMOLED, Mobile Premium HDR, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 52.3 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: headset (3,5 mm), Kortläsare: microSD upp till 256 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, position, hjärtfrekvens, rotation, närhet, tryck- och G-sensor, barometer, digital kompass, Iris-scanner, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, MST, Wi-Fi Direct, Miracast, OTG, Notification LED
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 och 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1880, 1900, 2010, 2100 MHz och AWS), LTE Cat. 16 (700, 800, 850, 900, 1500, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2300, 2500 och 2600 MHz, AWS samt AWS-3 MHz), LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.1 x 159.5 x 73.4
Batteri
3500 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Dual-pixel, OIS, f/1.7, 1.4 μm, UHD video)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (Autofocus, f/1.7)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Mono, Tangentbord: virtuellt, AKG-headset, två OTG-adaptrar, Samsung Experience UI 8.1, 24 Månader Garanti, USB-C (USB 3.1 Gen. 1), Bixby, IP68-certifierad, fanless
Vikt
172 g, Strömförsörjning: 62 g
Pris
899 Kr

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
532 MBit/s ∼100% +45%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB eMMC Flash
515 MBit/s ∼97% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
368 MBit/s ∼69%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 MBit/s ∼61% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s ∼53% -24%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
259 MBit/s ∼49% -30%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
485 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB eMMC Flash
435 MBit/s ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
220 MBit/s ∼34% -66%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
165 MBit/s ∼25% -75%
Samsung Galaxy S8+
Samsung Galaxy S8+
Samsung Galaxy S8+
Samsung Galaxy S8+
Samsung Galaxy S8+
Samsung Galaxy S8+
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
539
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
571
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 577 cd/m² Medel: 561.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.72 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 560 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | - Ø
99.87% sRGB (Argyll) 81.57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.13
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Huawei Mate 9
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Google Pixel XL 2016
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Lenovo Moto Z
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
HTC U Ultra
SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7
Screen
-3%
-83%
3%
-68%
-16%
-156%
Brightness
562
552
-2%
680
21%
553
-2%
408
-27%
490
-13%
445
-21%
Brightness Distribution
93
96
3%
93
0%
97
4%
85
-9%
92
-1%
88
-5%
Black Level *
0.42
0.35
0.22
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.7
1.59
6%
4.3
-153%
1.4
18%
4
-135%
2.1
-24%
5.5
-224%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
2.01
-26%
4.8
-200%
1.3
19%
3.2
-100%
2.6
-63%
7.6
-375%
Gamma
2.13 113%
2.01 119%
2.33 103%
2.21 109%
2.19 110%
2.23 108%
2.2 109%
CCT
6435 101%
6321 103%
7255 90%
6667 97%
7037 92%
6843 95%
7454 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
82.12
1%
63.1
-23%
88.14
8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87
99.98
0%
99.83
0%
100
0%
Contrast
1657
1591
2136

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

vs. sRGB (99.87%)
vs. sRGB (99.87%)
vs. Adobe RGB (81.57%)
vs. Adobe RGB (81.57%)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼56% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ
129317 Points ∼57% -22%
HTC U Ultra
139017 Points ∼61% -16%
LG G6
151751 Points ∼67% -8%
Google Pixel XL 2016
138641 Points ∼61% -16%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼57% -22%
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points ∼54% -25%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points ∼73% 0%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼27%
LG G6
4369 Points ∼17% -35%
Huawei Mate 9
6445 Points ∼26% -4%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼34%
LG G6
1831 Points ∼31% -9%
Huawei Mate 9
1866 Points ∼31% -7%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6375 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
5503 Points ∼20% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ
3701 Points ∼13% -42%
HTC U Ultra
3983 Points ∼14% -38%
Google Pixel XL 2016
4167 Points ∼15% -35%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points ∼14% -38%
Huawei Mate 9
5629 Points ∼20% -12%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
5630 Points ∼20% -12%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1952 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1840 Points ∼32% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ
1647 Points ∼29% -16%
HTC U Ultra
1643 Points ∼28% -16%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1513 Points ∼26% -22%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points ∼26% -24%
Huawei Mate 9
1947 Points ∼34% 0%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3476 Points ∼60% +78%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1280 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
733 Points ∼39% -43%
LG G6
647 Points ∼35% -49%
Google Pixel XL 2016
621 Points ∼33% -51%
Lenovo Moto Z
542 Points ∼29% -58%
Huawei Mate 9
699 Points ∼37% -45%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1177 Points ∼63% -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2512 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1811 Points ∼58% -28%
Sony Xperia XZ
1613 Points ∼52% -36%
HTC U Ultra
1837 Points ∼59% -27%
LG G6
2065 Points ∼67% -18%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2044 Points ∼66% -19%
Lenovo Moto Z
1813 Points ∼58% -28%
Huawei Mate 9
1997 Points ∼64% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3571 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2394 Points ∼34% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ
3144 Points ∼45% -12%
HTC U Ultra
2678 Points ∼38% -25%
LG G6
3117 Points ∼45% -13%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2863 Points ∼41% -20%
Lenovo Moto Z
2588 Points ∼37% -28%
Huawei Mate 9
2142 Points ∼31% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3265 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2234 Points ∼44% -32%
Sony Xperia XZ
2596 Points ∼51% -20%
HTC U Ultra
2431 Points ∼48% -26%
LG G6
2800 Points ∼55% -14%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2629 Points ∼52% -19%
Lenovo Moto Z
2363 Points ∼46% -28%
Huawei Mate 9
2108 Points ∼41% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1816 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1773 Points ∼57% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ
1516 Points ∼49% -17%
HTC U Ultra
1666 Points ∼54% -8%
LG G6
2058 Points ∼66% +13%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2009 Points ∼65% +11%
Lenovo Moto Z
1860 Points ∼60% +2%
Huawei Mate 9
2104 Points ∼68% +16%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1528 Points ∼49% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4137 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3071 Points ∼25% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ
4333 Points ∼36% +5%
HTC U Ultra
3795 Points ∼31% -8%
LG G6
5006 Points ∼41% +21%
Google Pixel XL 2016
4406 Points ∼36% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z
3930 Points ∼32% -5%
Huawei Mate 9
2421 Points ∼20% -41%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
5141 Points ∼42% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3222 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2641 Points ∼40% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ
3152 Points ∼47% -2%
HTC U Ultra
3001 Points ∼45% -7%
LG G6
3797 Points ∼57% +18%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3483 Points ∼52% +8%
Lenovo Moto Z
3151 Points ∼47% -2%
Huawei Mate 9
2343 Points ∼35% -27%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3371 Points ∼51% +5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼6% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps ∼6% -15%
HTC U Ultra
74 fps ∼5% -29%
LG G6
75 fps ∼5% -28%
Google Pixel XL 2016
91 fps ∼7% -12%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼6% -26%
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps ∼6% -23%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
91.96 fps ∼7% -12%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼11% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps ∼19% +52%
HTC U Ultra
46 fps ∼10% -21%
LG G6
46 fps ∼10% -21%
Google Pixel XL 2016
55 fps ∼12% -5%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼12% -9%
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps ∼13% +3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
57.71 fps ∼13% 0%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼7% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ
40 fps ∼7% -20%
HTC U Ultra
26 fps ∼5% -48%
LG G6
38 fps ∼7% -24%
Google Pixel XL 2016
48 fps ∼9% -4%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼8% -18%
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps ∼6% -32%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
58.71 fps ∼11% +17%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼7% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ
39 fps ∼11% +3%
HTC U Ultra
23 fps ∼6% -39%
LG G6
27 fps ∼7% -29%
Google Pixel XL 2016
30 fps ∼8% -21%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼7% -32%
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps ∼10% -3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
55.17 fps ∼15% +45%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼7% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps ∼7% -26%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼3% -71%
LG G6
29 fps ∼7% -31%
Google Pixel XL 2016
32 fps ∼8% -24%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼6% -36%
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps ∼6% -43%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.3 fps ∼10% -2%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼9% -35%
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps ∼18% +35%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼7% -48%
LG G6
16 fps ∼9% -30%
Google Pixel XL 2016
17 fps ∼10% -26%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼9% -35%
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps ∼16% +22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.5 fps ∼24% +80%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼4% -40%
Sony Xperia XZ
20 fps ∼6% -20%
HTC U Ultra
15 fps ∼4% -40%
LG G6
20 fps ∼6% -20%
Google Pixel XL 2016
19 fps ∼5% -24%
Lenovo Moto Z
16 fps ∼5% -36%
Huawei Mate 9
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7.9 fps ∼0% -39%
Sony Xperia XZ
19 fps ∼1% +46%
HTC U Ultra
8.4 fps ∼0% -35%
LG G6
11 fps ∼0% -15%
Google Pixel XL 2016
11 fps ∼0% -15%
Lenovo Moto Z
9.8 fps ∼0% -25%
Huawei Mate 9
14 fps ∼0% +8%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5195 Points ∼50%
Sony Xperia XZ
5616 Points ∼54% +8%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼51% 0%
LG G6
5152 Points ∼50% -1%
Huawei Mate 9
6299 Points ∼61% +21%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼55% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ
5058 Points ∼59% -13%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼61% -11%
LG G6
5703 Points ∼67% -2%
Google Pixel XL 2016
4739 Points ∼55% -19%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼89% +31%
Huawei Mate 9
7403 Points ∼87% +27%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼59% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ
1066 Points ∼63% -8%
HTC U Ultra
907 Points ∼53% -22%
LG G6
1073 Points ∼63% -8%
Google Pixel XL 2016
977 Points ∼58% -16%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼57% -18%
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points ∼63% -7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points ∼91% +33%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼24% -64%
Sony Xperia XZ
4716 Points ∼51% -23%
HTC U Ultra
4591 Points ∼50% -25%
LG G6
5138 Points ∼56% -16%
Google Pixel XL 2016
5017 Points ∼54% -18%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼47% -29%
Huawei Mate 9
3939 Points ∼43% -36%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points ∼74% +12%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼47% -34%
Sony Xperia XZ
1434 Points ∼32% -54%
HTC U Ultra
1581 Points ∼36% -50%
LG G6
1930 Points ∼44% -38%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1677 Points ∼38% -47%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼50% -30%
Huawei Mate 9
3850 Points ∼87% +23%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1319 Points ∼30% -58%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼40% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ
3047 Points ∼30% -43%
HTC U Ultra
2834 Points ∼28% -47%
LG G6
3646 Points ∼35% -31%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3889 Points ∼38% -27%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼33% -36%
Huawei Mate 9
3616 Points ∼35% -32%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points ∼64% +24%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼55% -37%
Sony Xperia XZ
2165 Points ∼57% -34%
HTC U Ultra
2078 Points ∼55% -37%
LG G6
2496 Points ∼66% -24%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2378 Points ∼63% -28%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼62% -29%
Huawei Mate 9
2772 Points ∼73% -16%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points ∼82% -6%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25.06 fps ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.31 fps ∼35% -47%
LG G6
24.34 fps ∼63% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z
24.33 fps ∼63% -3%
Huawei Mate 9
19.14 fps ∼50% -24%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2573 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2131 Points ∼63% -17%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2189 Points ∼64% -15%
Lenovo Moto Z
2461 Points ∼72% -4%
Huawei Mate 9
1921 Points ∼56% -25%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2017 Points ∼59% -22%
2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
7552 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6382 Points ∼34% -15%
Google Pixel XL 2016
6042 Points ∼33% -20%
Lenovo Moto Z
4781 Points ∼26% -37%
Huawei Mate 9
10255 Points ∼55% +36%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
5495 Points ∼30% -27%
Memory Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
9844 Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6136 Points ∼0% -38%
Google Pixel XL 2016
9673 Points ∼0% -2%
Lenovo Moto Z
8912 Points ∼0% -9%
Huawei Mate 9
14580 Points ∼0% +48%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
25299 Points ∼0% +157%
Disk Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
92548 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
36364 Points ∼27% -61%
Google Pixel XL 2016
44706 Points ∼33% -52%
Lenovo Moto Z
68378 Points ∼50% -26%
Huawei Mate 9
117939 Points ∼86% +27%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
48907 Points ∼36% -47%
CPU Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
238041 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
225427 Points ∼49% -5%
Google Pixel XL 2016
215105 Points ∼47% -10%
Lenovo Moto Z
170521 Points ∼37% -28%
Huawei Mate 9
256749 Points ∼56% +8%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
49294 Points ∼11% -79%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
10342 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8049 Points ∼60% -22%
Google Pixel XL 2016
8766 Points ∼65% -15%
Lenovo Moto Z
8795 Points ∼65% -15%
Huawei Mate 9
9449 Points ∼70% -9%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
8420 Points ∼62% -19%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
154 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
163 Points ∼22% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ
90 Points ∼12% -42%
LG G6
122 Points ∼16% -21%
Google Pixel XL 2016
126 Points ∼17% -18%
Lenovo Moto Z
112 Points ∼15% -27%
Huawei Mate 9
152 Points ∼20% -1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
204 Points ∼27% +32%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
62.198 Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
75.12 Points ∼0% +21%
Sony Xperia XZ
54.201 Points ∼0% -13%
HTC U Ultra
45.084 Points ∼0% -28%
LG G6
56.628 Points ∼0% -9%
Google Pixel XL 2016
55.4 Points ∼0% -11%
Lenovo Moto Z
47.5 Points ∼0% -24%
Huawei Mate 9
68.6 Points ∼0% +10%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
168.08 Points ∼0% +170%
Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
7466 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7198 (min: 6255) Points ∼95% -4%
LG G6
6032 Points ∼80% -19%
Google Pixel XL 2016
6271 Points ∼83% -16%
Lenovo Moto Z
5344 Points ∼71% -28%
Huawei Mate 9
7565 Points ∼100% +1%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
14050 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13191 Points ∼27% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ
9069 Points ∼18% -35%
HTC U Ultra
5511 Points ∼11% -61%
LG G6
9113 Points ∼18% -35%
Google Pixel XL 2016
8690 Points ∼18% -38%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points ∼16% -45%
Huawei Mate 9
11897 Points ∼24% -15%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
26053 Points ∼53% +85%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2236.7 ms * ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2564.1 ms * ∼4% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ
2768 ms * ∼5% -24%
HTC U Ultra
4141 ms * ∼7% -85%
LG G6
2464.2 ms * ∼4% -10%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2653.6 ms * ∼4% -19%
Lenovo Moto Z
3154.7 ms * ∼5% -41%
Huawei Mate 9
2733.7 ms * ∼5% -22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1102.7 ms * ∼2% +51%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S8 PlusSamsung Galaxy S7 EdgeSony Xperia XZHTC U UltraGoogle Pixel XL 2016Lenovo Moto ZHuawei Mate 9Apple iPhone 7 Plus
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
-45%
-12%
-40%
53%
-32%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
57.24
50.36
-12%
29.8
-48%
67.6
18%
45.64
-20%
29.53
-48%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
71.12
76.43
7%
33.5
-53%
82.8
16%
78.51
10%
53.97
-24%
Random Write 4KB
15.27
15.79
3%
10.5
-31%
13.7
-10%
14.56
-5%
74.93
391%
8.77
-43%
Random Read 4KB
127.18
86.71
-32%
71.5
-44%
84.2
-34%
87.67
-31%
117.15
-8%
94.69
-26%
Sequential Write 256KB
194.18
145.11
-25%
138
-29%
164.7
-15%
83.38
-57%
168.32
-13%
142.92
-26%
Sequential Read 256KB
787.6
487.34
-38%
281
-64%
423.9
-46%
258.23
-67%
439.66
-44%
594.23
-25%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
-50%
-27%
-18%
38%
55%
Memory Tests
9844
6136
-38%
9673
-2%
8912
-9%
14580
48%
25299
157%
Disk Tests
92548
36364
-61%
44706
-52%
68378
-26%
117939
27%
48907
-47%
BaseMark OS II
Memory
3135
2072
-34%
1434
-54%
1581
-50%
1677
-47%
2190
-30%
3850
23%
1319
-58%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-33% / -26%
-50% / -46%
-31% / -17%
-38% / -37%
2% / 28%
10% / -10%
-2% / 17%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
Hög belastning
 35.4 °C35.7 °C34.8 °C 
 35.2 °C35.6 °C33.5 °C 
 34.3 °C34.3 °C33.1 °C 
Max: 35.7 °C
Medel: 34.7 °C
32.3 °C35.8 °C36 °C
31.7 °C34.3 °C33.4 °C
31.8 °C32.8 °C33 °C
Max: 36 °C
Medel: 33.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  30.1 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.633.92525.429.83125.3264032.928.85033.627.66331.627.38028.425.71002730.312520.834.21602241.120021.349.225020.855.331521.260.840019.462.150019.566.663017.770.280017.972100017.873.4125017.373.6160017.474.4200016.773.3250017.274.1315018.273.2400017.969.8500017.666.9630017.769.6800017.863.81000017.953.81250018.1511600018.244.7SPL3082.9N1.356.6median 17.9Samsung Galaxy S8 Plusmedian 66.6Delta1.31126.428.426.42826.72825.828.725.829.133.229.126.12626.123.925.523.927.724.727.733.426.933.441.53741.540.320.240.343.720.243.745.521.845.547224752.822.252.860.121.860.166.517.266.569.217.869.271.619.871.669.919.169.96815.46869.515.669.56614.96671.514.771.571.214.271.272.21472.271.213.971.26713.86758.913.958.952.413.952.454.713.754.781.529.581.549.91.349.9median 66Apple iPhone 7 Plusmedian 17.2median 6610.93.810.931.66125.462.825.362.732.969.233.680.131.683.528.487.82787.120.884.82283.321.386.320.887.421.284.119.485.419.58517.78317.982.617.882.417.381.317.480.816.779.217.282.218.283.817.981.317.679.717.775.917.873.117.971.718.171.818.266.73093.51.3125.5median 17.9Teufel Boomstermedian 82.41.33.1hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Teufel Boomster audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.52 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.13 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.68 / 1.13 / 1.16 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.69 / 5.24 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
Google Pixel XL 2016
3450 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Power Consumption
-16%
-33%
-77%
-1%
-50%
-50%
Idle Minimum *
0.68
0.63
7%
0.62
9%
1
-47%
0.53
22%
0.77
-13%
0.78
-15%
Idle Average *
1.13
1.1
3%
1.43
-27%
2.41
-113%
1.07
5%
2.04
-81%
2.13
-88%
Idle Maximum *
1.16
1.56
-34%
1.48
-28%
2.46
-112%
1.12
3%
2.24
-93%
2.17
-87%
Load Average *
4.69
5.95
-27%
5.52
-18%
6.8
-45%
5.53
-18%
4.69
-0%
6.32
-35%
Load Maximum *
5.24
6.7
-28%
10.47
-100%
8.9
-70%
6.26
-19%
8.66
-65%
6.49
-24%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
26tim 05min
Surfa med WLAN v1.3
12tim 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12tim 22min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 35min
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
681 min ∼100% +28%
Huawei Mate 9
677 min ∼99% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
533 min ∼78%
Sony Xperia XZ
482 min ∼71% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7
371 min ∼54% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
Google Pixel XL 2016
3450 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ
2900 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Battery Runtime
18%
-17%
-24%
1%
2%
-33%
-11%
Reader / Idle
1565
1663
6%
1568
0%
1333
-15%
1789
14%
1538
-2%
1125
-28%
1371
-12%
H.264
742
914
23%
605
-18%
505
-32%
779
5%
947
28%
502
-32%
724
-2%
WiFi v1.3
736
732
-1%
546
-26%
505
-31%
692
-6%
758
3%
438
-40%
407
-45%
Load
275
392
43%
214
-22%
230
-16%
252
-8%
219
-20%
187
-32%
320
16%

För

+ utmärkt skärm
+ trevlig design
+ snabb SoC
+ mycket bra GPS
+ snabbt WiFi
+ Gigabit-LTE
+ bra röstkvalitet
+ lång batteritid
+ massor av sensorer
+ USB 3.1 med DP, HDMI och OTG
+ snabbladdning och trådlös laddning
+ damm- och vattentät
+ utmärkt kamera ...

Emot

- … som tyvärr inte förändrats mycket sedan föregångaren
- ej dual-SIM
- kunde haft stöd för fler LTE-band
- dålig placering av fingeravtrycksläsaren
- SoC-strypning under kontinuerlig belastning
- garantin täcker inte vattenskada
In review: Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (SM-G955F). Test model courtesy of Samsung Germany.
In review: Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (SM-G955F). Test model courtesy of Samsung Germany.

Läs det fullständiga originaltestet på engelska här


Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus är en utmärkt smartphone utan några allvarliga brister. Den nya och nästan ramfria designen ser bra ut på bild och är ännu mer imponerande när du håller den i handen. Infinity-skärmen övertygar i alla avseenden vad gäller färgreproduktion, ljusstyrka och reflexer. Prestandan med Samsungs nya Exynos 8895 är också utmärkt och kan till och med utmana Apples A10-krets.


Anslutningsmöjligheterna går heller knappt att kritisera. Röstkvaliteten är bra och du får väldigt snabbt Wi-Fi och Gigabit-LTE. Det sistnämna kunde haft stöd för fler frekvenser, då du kan få problem om du reser mycket i Nordamerika eller Asien. De lokala restriktionerna från tillverkaren är irriterande och det finns ingen dual-SIM-modell i Europa heller.


Vi skulle vilja se fler valmöjligheter i allmänhet. 128 GB-versionen kommer inte att bli tillgänglig i Europa, vilket också gäller några av färgerna.

Samsung har också implementerat många säkerhetsfunktioner. Det är dock enkelt att överlista ansiktsigenkänningen, så den kan vi inte rekommendera. Och fingeravtrycksläsaren på baksidan är knepig att nå.


Sammantaget har Samsung utvecklat en bra smartphone, som övertygar med sin snygga design, enastående kamera, långa batteritid och magnifika skärm. Tyvärr är Plus-varianten betydligt dyrare än den mindre S8-modellen.

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus - 04/13/2017 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Design
93%
Tangentbord
74 / 75 → 98%
Mus
98%
Anslutningar
65 / 60 → 100%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
94%
Skärm
93%
Spelprestanda
64 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
65 / 70 → 93%
Temperatur
92%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
94%
Medel
84%
92%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy S8+ (Plus, SM-G955F) (sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-05-25 (Update: 2017-05-25)