Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy A12 - Billig smartphone från Samsung med NFC och rejäl batteritid (Sammanfattning)

Stillastående galax. Samsungs instegstelefon Galaxy A12 kombinerar ett stort batteri på 5.000 mAh, en stor skärm samt en fyrdubbel kamera med en Helio P35 SoC från MediaTek. I vår recension av denna Galaxy-telefon får du reda på huruvida konceptet övertygar och vilka kompromisser man får acceptera på grund av det låga priset.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Galaxy A Serie)
Processor
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 8 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikkort
PowerVR GE8320
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.50 tum 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixlar 270 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, PLS LCD, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 1TB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, USB-C, OTG, Miracast
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth Yes, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.9 x 164 x 75.8
Batteri
5000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/2.0); 5 MP (f/2.2, 115˚); 2 MP (f/2.4); 2 MP (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.2)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Mono, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare på 15 Watt, USB-kabel, OneUI, 24 Månader Garanti, Widevine L1, SAR-värden: 0.673 W/​kg Huvud, 1.377 W/​kg Kropp, fanless
Vikt
205 g
Pris
179 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
sökrelation
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
75 %
03/2021
Samsung Galaxy A12
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320
205 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
82 %
09/2020
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
SD 732G, Adreno 618
215 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
76 %
06/2020
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2
192 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
80 %
09/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
199 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.53"2340x1080
77 %
02/2021
OnePlus Nord N100
SD 460, Adreno 610
188 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.52"1600x720
77 %
09/2020
Alcatel 3X 2020
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
186 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.52"1600x720
Recension av Samsung Galaxy A12
Recension av Samsung Galaxy A12
Recension av Samsung Galaxy A12
Recension av Samsung Galaxy A12
Recension av Samsung Galaxy A12
Recension av Samsung Galaxy A12
Recension av Samsung Galaxy A12
Recension av Samsung Galaxy A12
Recension av Samsung Galaxy A12
Recension av Samsung Galaxy A12

Storleksjämförelse

165.3 mm 76.8 mm 9.4 mm 215 g165 mm 75 mm 9.09 mm 186 g165 mm 75.1 mm 8.5 mm 188 g164 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 205 g163.7 mm 75.3 mm 8.9 mm 192 g162.3 mm 77.2 mm 8.9 mm 199 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
633 (589min - 676max) MBit/s ∼100% +1313%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=303, last 2 years)
415 MBit/s ∼66% +826%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
347 (172min - 352max) MBit/s ∼55% +675%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Mali-G52 MP2, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
310 (269min - 342max) MBit/s ∼49% +592%
OnePlus Nord N100
Adreno 610, SD 460, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
274 (223min - 335max) MBit/s ∼43% +512%
Alcatel 3X 2020
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 128 GB eMMC Flash
62 (18min - 93max) MBit/s ∼10% +38%
Samsung Galaxy A12
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.8 (30min - 59max) MBit/s ∼7%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
636 (500min - 675max) MBit/s ∼100% +1164%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=303, last 2 years)
419 MBit/s ∼66% +733%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
355 (327min - 366max) MBit/s ∼56% +606%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Mali-G52 MP2, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
326 (280min - 333max) MBit/s ∼51% +548%
OnePlus Nord N100
Adreno 610, SD 460, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
301 (260min - 334max) MBit/s ∼47% +498%
Samsung Galaxy A12
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.3 (8min - 62max) MBit/s ∼8%
Alcatel 3X 2020
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 128 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 (33min - 60max) MBit/s ∼7% -6%
0510152025303540455055605148326251555340383584553526052515154555954525352615554525951483262515553403835845535260525151545559545253526155545259595540524542455243484534444938344647444847445043493035424648Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø49.9 (8-62)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø44.8 (30-59)
Garmin Edge 520 GPS
Garmin Edge 520 GPS
Garmin Edge 520 GPS
Garmin Edge 520 GPS
Garmin Edge 520 GPS
Garmin Edge 520 GPS
Samsung Galaxy A12 GPS
Samsung Galaxy A12 GPS
Samsung Galaxy A12 GPS
Samsung Galaxy A12 GPS
Samsung Galaxy A12 GPS
Samsung Galaxy A12 GPS
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Huvudkamera
Huvudkamera
10x zoom (max)
10x zoom (max)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow-lightWide-angle camera
ColorChecker
16.4 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
16 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A12: 13.6 ∆E min: 4.13 - max: 21.68 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
57.5 ∆E
50 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
59.8 ∆E
60.1 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
70.7 ∆E
41.7 ∆E
40.8 ∆E
78.1 ∆E
68.5 ∆E
50.6 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A12: 44.04 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 78.12 ∆E
431
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 458 cd/m² Medel: 427.4 cd/m² Minimum: 5.4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 458 cd/m²
Kontrast: 864:1 (Svärta: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.04 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
96.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.293
Samsung Galaxy A12
PLS-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A21s
PLS, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
IPS LCD, 2340x1080, 6.53
OnePlus Nord N100
IPS, 1600x720, 6.52
Alcatel 3X 2020
IPS, 1600x720, 6.52
Screen
29%
-2%
74%
28%
63%
Brightness middle
458
623
36%
540
18%
553
21%
474
3%
510
11%
Brightness
427
600
41%
509
19%
527
23%
456
7%
491
15%
Brightness Distribution
85
93
9%
91
7%
89
5%
86
1%
92
8%
Black Level *
0.53
0.54
-2%
0.36
32%
0.12
77%
0.35
34%
0.09
83%
Contrast
864
1154
34%
1500
74%
4608
433%
1354
57%
5667
556%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.04
1.8
55%
6.58
-63%
3.8
6%
2.7
33%
6
-49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.84
4.7
31%
11.55
-69%
8.7
-27%
4.89
29%
11.9
-74%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
3.3
31%
6.4
-33%
2.2
54%
1.9
60%
6.9
-44%
Gamma
2.293 96%
2.26 97%
2.206 100%
2.3 96%
2.31 95%
2.31 95%
CCT
7535 86%
6712 97%
8482 77%
6727 97%
6430 101%
7971 82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 337.8 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 337.8 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 337.8 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 14804 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31 ms rise
↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.1 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
169 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
567 Points ∼100% +236%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
182 Points ∼32% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
356 Points ∼63% +111%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
254 Points ∼45% +50%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
150 Points ∼26% -11%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (150 - 173, n=5)
166 Points ∼29% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=235, last 2 years)
565 Points ∼100% +234%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1022 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1787 Points ∼92% +75%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1081 Points ∼56% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1259 Points ∼65% +23%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
1152 Points ∼59% +13%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
873 Points ∼45% -15%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (539 - 1022, n=5)
887 Points ∼46% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=235, last 2 years)
1939 Points ∼100% +90%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
6192 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8773 Points ∼77% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
7113 Points ∼62% +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
11421 Points ∼100% +84%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
7526 Points ∼66% +22%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (4040 - 7753, n=8)
5969 Points ∼52% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=223, last 2 years)
9982 Points ∼87% +61%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4983 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8101 Points ∼93% +63%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
5457 Points ∼63% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
8698 Points ∼100% +75%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
5718 Points ∼66% +15%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
5112 Points ∼59% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (3814 - 5794, n=11)
5045 Points ∼58% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=267, last 2 years)
7878 Points ∼91% +58%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
14087 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
40955 Points ∼100% +191%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
16800 Points ∼41% +19%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
13675 Points ∼33% -3%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (7637 - 14647, n=9)
12273 Points ∼30% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=207, last 2 years)
40247 Points ∼98% +186%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
13235 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
56640 Points ∼98% +328%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
16301 Points ∼28% +23%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
13392 Points ∼23% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (7061 - 13939, n=9)
11527 Points ∼20% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=207, last 2 years)
58049 Points ∼100% +339%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
17853 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20797 Points ∼89% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
18816 Points ∼81% +5%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
14768 Points ∼63% -17%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (10689 - 17853, n=9)
15977 Points ∼69% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=207, last 2 years)
23323 Points ∼100% +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
733 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3784 Points ∼100% +416%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1280 Points ∼34% +75%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
1419 Points ∼38% +94%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
830 Points ∼22% +13%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (244 - 850, n=11)
621 Points ∼16% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=261, last 2 years)
3370 Points ∼89% +360%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
645 Points ∼16%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3917 Points ∼99% +507%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1157 Points ∼29% +79%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
1284 Points ∼33% +99%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
749 Points ∼19% +16%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (205 - 789, n=11)
558 Points ∼14% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=261, last 2 years)
3942 Points ∼100% +511%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1098 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3382 Points ∼100% +208%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2034 Points ∼60% +85%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
2248 Points ∼66% +105%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
1074 Points ∼32% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (722 - 1177, n=11)
1062 Points ∼31% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=261, last 2 years)
2757 Points ∼82% +151%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
879 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3918 Points ∼99% +346%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1292 Points ∼33% +47%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
873 Points ∼22% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (725 - 918, n=11)
823 Points ∼21% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=277, last 2 years)
3947 Points ∼100% +349%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
811 Points ∼16%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4086 Points ∼82% +404%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1157 Points ∼23% +43%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
822 Points ∼16% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (695 - 858, n=11)
771 Points ∼15% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=277, last 2 years)
4982 Points ∼100% +514%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1123 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼100% +205%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2190 Points ∼64% +95%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
1114 Points ∼33% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (653 - 1218, n=11)
1082 Points ∼32% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=275, last 2 years)
2908 Points ∼85% +159%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
367 Points ∼14%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2713 Points ∼100% +639%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
912 Points ∼34% +149%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
860 Points ∼32% +134%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
435 Points ∼16% +19%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (178 - 512, n=11)
385 Points ∼14% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=259, last 2 years)
2628 Points ∼97% +616%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
298 Points ∼11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2559 Points ∼92% +759%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
788 Points ∼28% +164%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
732 Points ∼26% +146%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
372 Points ∼13% +25%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (145 - 508, n=11)
349 Points ∼13% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=259, last 2 years)
2784 Points ∼100% +834%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1098 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3436 Points ∼100% +213%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2037 Points ∼59% +86%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
2229 Points ∼65% +103%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
1057 Points ∼31% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (435 - 1183, n=11)
1006 Points ∼29% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=259, last 2 years)
2803 Points ∼82% +155%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
478 Points ∼15%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2865 Points ∼90% +499%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
914 Points ∼29% +91%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
855 Points ∼27% +79%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
491 Points ∼15% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (478 - 564, n=11)
525 Points ∼16% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=275, last 2 years)
3191 Points ∼100% +568%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
423 Points ∼12%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2735 Points ∼77% +547%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
784 Points ∼22% +85%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
729 Points ∼20% +72%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
424 Points ∼12% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (423 - 489, n=11)
458 Points ∼13% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=275, last 2 years)
3565 Points ∼100% +743%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1077 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3438 Points ∼100% +219%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2168 Points ∼63% +101%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
2166 Points ∼63% +101%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
1091 Points ∼32% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (766 - 1223, n=11)
1103 Points ∼32% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=275, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼86% +175%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
613 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2506 Points ∼95% +309%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
900 Points ∼34% +47%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
803 Points ∼30% +31%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
595 Points ∼23% -3%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (433 - 618, n=4)
525 Points ∼20% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=216, last 2 years)
2634 Points ∼100% +330%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
541 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2427 Points ∼82% +349%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
775 Points ∼26% +43%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
682 Points ∼23% +26%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
494 Points ∼17% -9%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (353 - 541, n=4)
441 Points ∼15% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=216, last 2 years)
2956 Points ∼100% +446%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2065 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2827 Points ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2059 Points ∼73% 0%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
2134 Points ∼75% +3%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
2108 Points ∼75% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2048 - 2084, n=4)
2069 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=216, last 2 years)
2651 Points ∼94% +28%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
31 fps ∼52%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +94%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
34 fps ∼57% +10%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
37 fps ∼62% +19%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (18 - 31, n=5)
24.6 fps ∼41% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=215, last 2 years)
57 fps ∼95% +84%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
23 fps ∼22%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
91 fps ∼86% +296%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
24 fps ∼23% +4%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
24 fps ∼23% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (19 - 23, n=5)
20.4 fps ∼19% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=215, last 2 years)
106 fps ∼100% +361%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
20 fps ∼44%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼76% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
28 fps ∼62% +40%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
24 fps ∼53% +20%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (9.1 - 20, n=5)
14.7 fps ∼33% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=213, last 2 years)
45 fps ∼100% +125%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
12 fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
45 fps ∼73% +275%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
15 fps ∼24% +25%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
14 fps ∼23% +17%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (9.8 - 12, n=5)
10.5 fps ∼17% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=214, last 2 years)
62 fps ∼100% +417%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
13 fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28 fps ∼79% +115%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
19 fps ∼54% +46%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼54% +46%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (6 - 13, n=5)
9.38 fps ∼26% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=212, last 2 years)
35.4 fps ∼100% +172%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.9 fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
33 fps ∼78% +318%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
9.4 fps ∼22% +19%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
9.3 fps ∼22% +18%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (5.8 - 7.9, n=5)
6.56 fps ∼15% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=212, last 2 years)
42.5 fps ∼100% +438%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5 fps ∼23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼77% +240%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
11 fps ∼50% +120%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
9.5 fps ∼43% +90%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2.8 - 5, n=5)
3.9 fps ∼18% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=211, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼100% +344%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
3.3 fps ∼13%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
19 fps ∼75% +476%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
5.9 fps ∼23% +79%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
5.2 fps ∼20% +58%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2.6 - 3.3, n=5)
2.84 fps ∼11% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=211, last 2 years)
25.5 fps ∼100% +673%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.5 fps ∼34%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼81% +140%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
12 fps ∼54% +60%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
11 fps ∼50% +47%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
7.2 fps ∼32% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (3.5 - 7.6, n=11)
6.16 fps ∼28% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=280, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼100% +196%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.2 fps ∼16%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20 fps ∼78% +376%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
6.2 fps ∼24% +48%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
6 fps ∼23% +43%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
4 fps ∼16% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (3.8 - 4.2, n=11)
3.9 fps ∼15% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=279, last 2 years)
25.6 fps ∼100% +510%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.7 fps ∼32%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼74% +134%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
7.2 fps ∼49% +53%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
6.6 fps ∼45% +40%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
4.6 fps ∼31% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2.2 - 4.8, n=10)
3.85 fps ∼26% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=280, last 2 years)
14.8 fps ∼100% +215%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps ∼15%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7.5 fps ∼74% +400%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2.2 fps ∼22% +47%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
2 fps ∼20% +33%
Alcatel 3X 2020
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 6144
1.5 fps ∼15% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (1.4 - 1.5, n=10)
1.45 fps ∼14% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=279, last 2 years)
10.1 fps ∼100% +573%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
108503 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
279048 Points ∼84% +157%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
124232 Points ∼37% +14%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
146027 Points ∼44% +35%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (101535 - 108503, n=3)
104335 Points ∼31% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=186, last 2 years)
331491 Points ∼100% +206%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1318 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3477 Points ∼96% +164%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1644 Points ∼45% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2285 Points ∼63% +73%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
2012 Points ∼56% +53%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (1131 - 1318, n=4)
1219 Points ∼34% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=198, last 2 years)
3625 Points ∼100% +175%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2983 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
6542 Points ∼99% +119%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
3382 Points ∼51% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
5010 Points ∼76% +68%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
4021 Points ∼61% +35%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (2390 - 2983, n=4)
2598 Points ∼39% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=198, last 2 years)
6635 Points ∼100% +122%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1268 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4041 Points ∼95% +219%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1884 Points ∼44% +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2536 Points ∼60% +100%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
2736 Points ∼65% +116%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (1141 - 1366, n=4)
1249 Points ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=198, last 2 years)
4241 Points ∼100% +234%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1023 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3960 Points ∼71% +287%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1159 Points ∼21% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1845 Points ∼33% +80%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
1378 Points ∼25% +35%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (792 - 1023, n=4)
869 Points ∼15% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=198, last 2 years)
5613 Points ∼100% +449%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A12
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
887 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1395 Points ∼100% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
990 Points ∼71% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1198 Points ∼86% +35%
OnePlus Nord N100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
1082 Points ∼78% +22%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
  (680 - 887, n=4)
818 Points ∼59% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=198, last 2 years)
1272 Points ∼91% +43%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
52.591 Points ∼100% +206%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=184, last 2 years)
50 Points ∼95% +191%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
29.951 Points ∼57% +74%
OnePlus Nord N100 (Chrome 87)
26.783 Points ∼51% +56%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)
19.147 Points ∼36% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
17.19 Points ∼33%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (13.6 - 17.2, n=3)
15.1 Points ∼29% -12%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
90.555 Points ∼100% +256%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=192, last 2 years)
89.7 Points ∼99% +253%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
53.874 Points ∼59% +112%
OnePlus Nord N100 (Chrome 87)
39.652 Points ∼44% +56%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)
28.012 Points ∼31% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
25.439 Points ∼28%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (23.8 - 26.2, n=4)
25.4 Points ∼28% 0%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=165, last 2 years)
50.7 runs/min ∼100% +270%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
43.9 runs/min ∼87% +220%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
27 runs/min ∼53% +97%
OnePlus Nord N100 (Chome 87)
23 runs/min ∼45% +68%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chome 84)
15 runs/min ∼30% +9%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (13.7 - 16, n=3)
14.8 runs/min ∼29% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
13.7 runs/min ∼27%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=202, last 2 years)
78 Points ∼100% +144%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
72 Points ∼92% +125%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
45 Points ∼58% +41%
OnePlus Nord N100 (Chrome 87)
44 Points ∼56% +38%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)
35 Points ∼45% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
32 Points ∼41%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (29 - 32, n=3)
30.7 Points ∼39% -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
17398 Points ∼100% +275%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=209, last 2 years)
17325 Points ∼100% +273%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
10299 Points ∼59% +122%
OnePlus Nord N100 (Chrome 87)
7306 Points ∼42% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)
4976 Points ∼29% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
4643 Points ∼27%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (4347 - 4707, n=4)
4548 Points ∼26% -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A12 (Chrome 88)
11082.2 ms * ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (10236 - 11323, n=4)
10872 ms * ∼98% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)
9174.1 ms * ∼83% +17%
OnePlus Nord N100 (Chrome 87)
5433.4 ms * ∼49% +51%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=211, last 2 years)
3999 ms * ∼36% +64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
3901.3 ms * ∼35% +65%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
2672.8 ms * ∼24% +76%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A12Xiaomi Poco X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy A21sXiaomi Redmi Note 9OnePlus Nord N100Alcatel 3X 2020Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
56%
20%
53%
63%
-11%
-10%
90%
Sequential Read 256KB
269.7
505.96
88%
307
14%
306.57
14%
504.1
87%
288.91
7%
274 (95.6 - 704, n=169)
2%
751 (41.9 - 2037, n=286, last 2 years)
178%
Sequential Write 256KB
211.6
173.09
-18%
104.3
-51%
248.14
17%
219
3%
185.74
-12%
178 (40 - 274, n=169)
-16%
328 (11.9 - 1321, n=286, last 2 years)
55%
Random Read 4KB
65.4
123.43
89%
77.2
18%
65.13
0%
106.1
62%
65.71
0%
58.5 (11.4 - 149, n=169)
-11%
134 (13.5 - 325, n=286, last 2 years)
105%
Random Write 4KB
39.1
112.55
188%
89.5
129%
146.94
276%
120.8
209%
11.49
-71%
28.6 (3.4 - 147, n=169)
-27%
120 (4.97 - 330, n=286, last 2 years)
207%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
77.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
75.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-3%
80 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
84.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
85.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
82.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
77.4 (21.1 - 108, n=144)
0%
75.9 (13.4 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)
-2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-10%
66.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
63.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
64.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
63.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
58.3 (11.2 - 83.3, n=144)
-5%
58.2 (8.4 - 83.3, n=175, last 2 years)
-6%
PUBG Mobile and Asphalt 9 Legends
051015202530212823293029302930303030273027232142321292929293030312931302926232930303030302918292730303029312828302825212523282926282830292929293029252425262731303028262430283130303029293029303130293029262727303030303029252828303027252629282128232930293029303030302730272321423212929292930303129313029262329303030303029182927303030293128283028252125232829262828302929292930292524252627313030282624302831303030292930293031302930292627273030303030292528283030272526292821212113121925202121262122191619171517323292528302917221620112024262623262227252724252729272726232813101426262829272930282927232614151918182113202324222525152113168212629293026313030303130293031292829191227252128232930293029303030302730272321423212929292930303129313029262329303030303029182927303030293128283028252125232829262828302929292930292524252627313030282624302831303030292930293031302930292627273030303030292528283030272526292821212113121925202121262122191619171517323292528302917221620112024262623262227252724252729272726232813101426262829272930282927232614151918182113202324222525152113168212629293026313030303130293031292829191227252525111182425252525242425252525232625252425252525252525252425252026242523252524252524242424252425252521252525192525252525252426242525252524252525252425252523262416241825252525242525252525242624252425242525242424242526212823293029302930303030273027232142321292929293030312931302926232930303030302918292730303029312828302825212523282926282830292929293029252425262731303028262430283130303029293029303130293029262727303030303029252828303027252629282121211312192520212126212219161917151732329252830291722162011202426262326222725272425272927272623281310142626282927293028292723261415191818211320232422252515211316821262929302631303030313029303129282919122725252511118242525252524242525252523262525242525252525252525242525202624252325252425252424242425242525252125252519252525252525242624252525252425252525242525252326241624182525252524252525252524262425242524252524242424252625211923242024242525252525252320252423232525232425232525252422222222252425252524251825242523131925242526232525252525242523252525252525252525252425262423252323262525242226252524262325252525242425252524252425242524262524232622252525242525232523252525242624252525262425252525242223242525242525252525242525242625252525252426242525252525242621232526262524252525252524252524252624252426222624242623262523232525242424232525232625232325Tooltip
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low: Ø27.8 (2-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality: Ø22.5 (1-31)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø24.1 (1-26)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø24.3 (13-26)
Hög belastning
 39.1 °C35.2 °C32.9 °C 
 39.7 °C35.3 °C33.8 °C 
 38.4 °C34.4 °C33 °C 
Max: 39.7 °C
Medel: 35.8 °C
32.4 °C35.9 °C39.1 °C
32.2 °C35.6 °C43.2 °C
32.1 °C35 °C42.6 °C
Max: 43.2 °C
Medel: 36.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  37.7 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.543.22532.636.43127.525.44030.230.95032.336.36325.5258017.820.610022.621.412514.617.116013.328.72001136.82509.741.8315849.34008.654.950011.259.463013.759.680015.356.6100017.464.7125010.369.5160010.572.3200010.672.9250011.270.8315012.571.6400014.363.9500015.261.163001568.5800016.169.91000017.365.31250016.254.31600016.954.1SPL6568.126.180.9N18.221.50.745.1median 13.7median 59.6Delta2.812.530.530.121.326.518.425.822.52420.328.115.828.315.728.616.728.315.133.11550.410.651.114.155.410.862.310.962.410.567.28.8691071.110.173.111.176.111.979.61180.512.180.812.57812.778.313.478.913.874.21571.11467.814.162.814.162.424.489.20.574.8median 12.5median 69210.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A12Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A12 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.1 / 1.6 / 2.6 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.5 / 6.4 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy A12
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
5160 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A21s
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
5020 mAh
OnePlus Nord N100
5000 mAh
Alcatel 3X 2020
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-14%
-17%
5%
15%
37%
8%
1%
Idle Minimum *
1.1
0.93
15%
1.5
-36%
0.74
33%
0.56
49%
0.55
50%
0.961 (0.63 - 1.3, n=8)
13%
0.934 (0.37 - 2.5, n=234, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Average *
1.6
2.47
-54%
2.1
-31%
2.17
-36%
1.8
-13%
1.47
8%
1.991 (1.6 - 2.35, n=8)
-24%
1.843 (0.65 - 3.94, n=234, last 2 years)
-15%
Idle Maximum *
2.6
2.51
3%
2.9
-12%
2.2
15%
2.3
12%
1.64
37%
2.35 (1.92 - 2.9, n=8)
10%
2.1 (0.69 - 4.2, n=234, last 2 years)
19%
Load Average *
4.5
5.62
-25%
4.6
-2%
4.17
7%
3.9
13%
2.32
48%
3.45 (2.74 - 4.5, n=8)
23%
4.46 (2.1 - 8.4, n=234, last 2 years)
1%
Load Maximum *
6.4
6.93
-8%
6.6
-3%
6.11
5%
5.6
12%
3.7
42%
5.27 (4.71 - 6.4, n=8)
18%
7.24 (3.16 - 12.3, n=234, last 2 years)
-13%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
62tim 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
21tim 28min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14tim 47min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 36min
Samsung Galaxy A12
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
5160 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A21s
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
5020 mAh
OnePlus Nord N100
5000 mAh
Alcatel 3X 2020
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-8%
-16%
-13%
-7%
10%
Reader / Idle
3743
2427
-35%
2009
-46%
2294
-39%
2513
-33%
H.264
887
1188
34%
1087
23%
1116
26%
1206
36%
WiFi v1.3
1288
1116
-13%
943
-27%
867
-33%
1149
-11%
1417
10%
Load
336
280
-17%
287
-15%
314
-7%
267
-21%

För

+ Gediget hantverk
+ Trippel kortplats
+ Bra anslutbarhet (NFC, VoLTE, VoWiFi, FM-radio, ...)
+ Lång batteritid
+ Bra kameror

Emot

- Långsamt WLAN
- Låg prestanda
- Högtalaren
- Skärmen och PWM

Omdöme - Samsung Galaxy A12: Vi hade gärna sett några ändringar till

Recension av Samsung Galaxy A12. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de
Recension av Samsung Galaxy A12. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Med Galaxy A12 har Samsung lyckats skapa en gedigen smartphone i det lägre prisskiktet. Mittenskiktaren, som var ganska blygsam i vårt test, tog skapliga bilder med sin huvudkamera, var välbyggd och hade dessutom en texturerad baksida som vi gillade. Riktigt lång batteritid och trevliga funktioner som One UI och Samsung Knox är också till fördel för Galaxy A12.

Men Samsungs telefon delar dessa egenskaper med Galaxy A21s, som vi redan recenserat. Vi kan knappt se någon nämnvärd utveckling mellan 2021- och 2020 års modell. Till viss del gäller till och med det motsatta, för den sistnämnda har betydligt snabbare WLAN och en aningen snabbare SoC. Dessutom ska även A21s får One UI 3-gränssnittet.  

Galaxy A12 kändes lite tråkig i vårt test. Vi kan bara hoppas att Samsung i framtiden även kommer att använda AMOLED:s i de billigare A-modellerna.

Om de begränsningar Galaxy A12 har inte är avgörande bör du överväga Samsungs billiga smartphone. Men det finns andra telefoner i det här prisskiktet, exempelvis Redmi Note 9, som visar att det går att uppnå ännu lite mer trots en såpass låg budget.

Samsung Galaxy A12 - 02/15/2021 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Design
81%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
87%
Anslutningar
40 / 70 → 58%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
84%
Spelprestanda
6 / 64 → 10%
Programprestanda
42 / 86 → 49%
Temperatur
88%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
66 / 90 → 73%
Camera
59%
Medel
69%
75%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Stephanie Chamberlain
Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 364 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020
contact me via: LinkedIn
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy A12 - Billig smartphone från Samsung med NFC och rejäl batteritid (Sammanfattning)
Marcus Herbrich, 2021-03- 1 (Update: 2021-03- 1)