Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: OnePlus Nord N100 - Tvåtusenkronorstelefon med lyxfunktioner? (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77.2 % | 02/2021 | OnePlus Nord N100 SD 460, Adreno 610 | 188 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.52" | 1600x720 | |
| 79.7 % | 09/2020 | Realme 7 Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4 | 196.5 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 81.8 % | 09/2020 | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC SD 732G, Adreno 618 | 215 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 77.9 % | 10/2020 | Motorola Moto G9 Play SD 662, Adreno 610 | 200 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 76 % | 10/2020 | Nokia 3.4 SD 460, Adreno 610 | 180 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.39" | 1560x720 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Realme 7 | |
| OnePlus Nord N100 | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
| Nokia 3.4 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus Nord N100 | |
| Realme 7 | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
| Nokia 3.4 | |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main lens plantsMain lens surroundingsMain lens low light
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 474 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1354:1 (Svärta: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
| OnePlus Nord N100 IPS, 1600x720, 6.52 | Realme 7 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50 | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67 | Motorola Moto G9 Play IPS, 1600x720, 6.50 | Nokia 3.4 IPS, 1560x720, 6.39 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -36% | -4% | -55% | -50% | |
| Brightness middle | 474 | 525 11% | 623 31% | 450 -5% | 440 -7% |
| Brightness | 456 | 512 12% | 600 32% | 428 -6% | 417 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 90 5% | 93 8% | 88 2% | 91 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.55 -57% | 0.54 -54% | 0.23 34% | 0.4 -14% |
| Contrast | 1354 | 955 -29% | 1154 -15% | 1957 45% | 1100 -19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 4.4 -63% | 1.8 33% | 5.49 -103% | 4.77 -77% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.89 | 6.75 -38% | 4.7 4% | 10.19 -108% | 8.85 -81% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 4.3 -126% | 3.3 -74% | 7.5 -295% | 5.7 -200% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.3 96% | 2.26 97% | 2.495 88% | 2.156 102% |
| CCT | 6430 101% | 7472 87% | 6712 97% | 8711 75% | 7660 85% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus Nord N100 | |
| Realme 7 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
| Nokia 3.4 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (19 - 19, n=4) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus Nord N100 | |
| Realme 7 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
| Nokia 3.4 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (9.3 - 9.5, n=4) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus Nord N100 | |
| Realme 7 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
| Nokia 3.4 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (143097 - 154839, n=4) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Realme 7 (Chrome 86) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85) | |
| OnePlus Nord N100 (Chrome 87) | |
| Nokia 3.4 (Chrome 87) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (17.8 - 26.8, n=3) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Realme 7 (Chrome 86) | |
| OnePlus Nord N100 (Chrome 87) | |
| Nokia 3.4 (Chrome 87) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (25.5 - 39.7, n=4) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Realme 7 (Chome 86) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chome 85) | |
| Nokia 3.4 (Chome 87) | |
| OnePlus Nord N100 (Chome 87) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (15.3 - 23.6, n=4) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Realme 7 (Chrome 86) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85) | |
| OnePlus Nord N100 (Chrome 87) | |
| Nokia 3.4 (Chrome 87) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (31 - 44, n=4) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=212, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Realme 7 (Chrome 86) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85) | |
| OnePlus Nord N100 (Chrome 87) | |
| Nokia 3.4 (Chrome 87) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (4832 - 7517, n=4) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (5433 - 8215, n=4) | |
| Nokia 3.4 (Chrome 87) | |
| OnePlus Nord N100 (Chrome 87) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85) | |
| Realme 7 (Chrome 86) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus Nord N100 | Realme 7 | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | Motorola Moto G9 Play | Nokia 3.4 | Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 11% | -6% | -13% | -15% | 0% | 216% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 504 | 529 5% | 506 0% | 315.2 -37% | 301.9 -40% | 696 ? 38% | 1502 ? 198% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 219 | 200 -9% | 173.1 -21% | 187.2 -15% | 221.6 1% | 224 ? 2% | 1111 ? 407% |
| Random Read 4KB | 106.1 | 153.3 44% | 123.4 16% | 98.4 -7% | 123.1 16% | 137.2 ? 29% | 247 ? 133% |
| Random Write 4KB | 120.8 | 151.3 25% | 112.6 -7% | 96.1 -20% | 42.5 -65% | 84.7 ? -30% | 271 ? 124% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 85.2 ? | 84.6 ? -1% | 75.2 ? -12% | 85.4 ? 0% | 85.8 ? 1% | 68.6 ? -19% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64.3 ? | 66.3 ? 3% | 55.6 ? -14% | 65.3 ? 2% | 62.4 ? -3% | 52.2 ? -19% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
OnePlus Nord N100 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 80.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 80.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 80.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (115.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.56 / 1.8 / 2.3 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
3.9 / 5.6 Watt |
    
| |
| OnePlus Nord N100 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -36% | 7% | -20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.56 | 0.93 -66% | 0.4967 ? 11% | 0.897 ? -60% |
| Idle Average * | 1.8 | 2.47 -37% | 1.79 ? 1% | 1.452 ? 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.3 | 2.51 -9% | 2.13 ? 7% | 1.629 ? 29% |
| Load Average * | 3.9 | 5.62 -44% | 3.51 ? 10% | 5.55 ? -42% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.6 | 6.93 -24% | 5.4 ? 4% | 8.31 ? -48% |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus Nord N100 5000 mAh | Realme 7 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh | Motorola Moto G9 Play 5000 mAh | Nokia 3.4 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -12% | -1% | -16% | -27% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2513 | 2427 -3% | |||
| H.264 | 1206 | 1188 -1% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 1149 | 1006 -12% | 1116 -3% | 962 -16% | 843 -27% |
| Load | 267 | 280 5% |
För
Emot
Omdöme – Inte perfekt men ett totalt sett skapligt paket
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
OnePlus Nord N100 är en billig smartphone som definitivt ser lyxig ut. Den har en 90 Hz-skärm med god färgprecision, lång batteritid, stereohögtalare, en skaplig kamera och snabb lagring, vilket verkligen är ett bra erbjudande för ett pris på under 2.000 kronor.
Men när det kommer till lågpristelefonerna har OnePlus gett upp en del saker som tidigare varit självklart, vilket kan göra fans besvikna: Exempelvis har man sagt att man bara planerar att släppa smartphones med 5G, men OnePlus Nord N100 kommer utan stöd för 5G. Det finns ingen slider för att snabbt tysta telefonen och man får troligen leva med färre mjukvaruuppdateringar.
Oavsett så har det nya sättet att se på saker också en positiv sida: OnePlus har lagt till en microSD-läsare trots att man tidigare sagt att man tycker den typen av lagring är för långsam och opraktisk för användaren. Telefonen har också en 3.5 mm-port, något som sedan länge har varit borta från företagets dyrare enheter.
För under 2.000 kronor är OnePlus Nord N100 ett bra val med många funktioner och lång batteritid.
Men man bör beakta den starka konkurrensen: realme och Xiaomi har båda telefoner med högre prestanda, mer ljusstarka skärmar, mer flexibla kameror och till viss del snabbare WLAN. OnePlus Nord N100 är också en bra smartphone och ger mycket för pengarna, men OnePlus har inte gjort det lätt för sig med sin långsamma SoC.
I slutändan är det detaljerna som kommer avgöra huruvida du gillar OnePlus smartphone: Gillar du mjukvaran, är ett bra men inte särskilt flexibelt kamerasystem tillräckligt och klarar du dig utan stora mängder prestanda? Om så är fallet är OnePlus Nord N100 ett bra val.
OnePlus Nord N100
-
01/27/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt
Pricecompare
