Notebookcheck

Test: OnePlus 5T Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 01/18/2018

Den är tillbaka! Bara ett par månader efter att föregångaren släpptes så har OnePlus nu prestenterat sin senaste smartphone. OnePlus 5T kommer i det moderna 2:1-formatet och har förbättrade kameror. Men är ändringarna tillräckligt för att det ska vara en övertygande uppgradering?

OnePlus 5T (5 Serie)
Minne
8192 MB 
Skärm
6.01 tum 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixlar 402 PPI, kapacitiv skärm, AMOLED, 2.5D Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 111 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Hall-sensor, accelerometer, kompass, gyroskop, närhet, RGB, sensor-hubb, USB Typ-C
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1700/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B30/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.3 x 156.1 x 75
Batteri
12.5 Wh, 3300 mAh Litiumjon, Dash Charge (5V 4A)
Operativsystem
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix dual-kamera: Sony IMX 298, 1.12μm, f/1.7, brännpunkt: 27.22 mm, dual-LED blixt, || 20 MPix IMX 376K, 1.0 μm, brännpunkt: 27.22 mm, video: [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix Sensor IMX 371, pixelstorlek: 1.0 μm, bländare: f/2.0, [email protected]
Övrigt
Högtalare: monohögtalare på undre kanten, Tangentbord: virtuellt tangentbord, Nätadapter, skal, SIM-verktyg, 24 Månader Garanti, bandbredd (nerladdning/uppladdning): 600Mbps/150Mbps (LTE); SAR-värden: 1.41 W/kg (kropp), 0.51 W/kg (huvud), fanless
Vikt
162 g, Strömförsörjning: 106 g
Pris
559 Kr

 

OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T
OnePlus 5T

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s ∼100% +70%
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
489 MBit/s ∼74% +27%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
386 MBit/s ∼59%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371 MBit/s ∼56% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
368 MBit/s ∼56% -5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s ∼51% -13%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
239 MBit/s ∼36% -38%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s ∼93% +1%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 MBit/s ∼92%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
539 MBit/s ∼77% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
500 MBit/s ∼71% -23%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
329 MBit/s ∼47% -49%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 MBit/s ∼40% -57%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - path
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - path
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - loop
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - loop
GPS OnePlus 5T - overview
GPS OnePlus 5T - overview
GPS OnePlus 5T - path
GPS OnePlus 5T - path
GPS OnePlus 5T - loop
GPS OnePlus 5T - loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
402
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 439 cd/m² Medel: 423.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.13 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 425 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.32
OnePlus 5T
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01
Sony Xperia XZ1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Google Pixel 2 XL
P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
OnePlus 5
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-23%
-47%
-16%
-61%
20%
6%
Brightness middle
425
620
46%
656
54%
415
-2%
432
2%
560
32%
426
0%
Brightness
423
610
44%
634
50%
420
-1%
428
1%
562
33%
431
2%
Brightness Distribution
92
93
1%
93
1%
87
-5%
87
-5%
93
1%
93
1%
Black Level *
0.79
0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.1
4.2
-100%
5.3
-152%
2.7
-29%
4.18
-99%
1.7
19%
1.6
24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.4
5.8
-71%
7.8
-129%
4.3
-26%
8.53
-151%
3.4
-0%
4.1
-21%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
3.9
-56%
5.2
-108%
3.3
-32%
5.3
-112%
1.6
36%
1.7
32%
Gamma
2.32 103%
2.02 119%
2.22 108%
2.36 102%
2.33 103%
2.13 113%
2.25 107%
CCT
6455 101%
7086 92%
7905 82%
6787 96%
7487 87%
6435 101%
6329 103%
Contrast
785
1640
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 242.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10287 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
172124 Points ∼75%
Sony Xperia XZ1
167748 Points ∼73% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
68282 Points ∼30% -60%
Google Pixel 2 XL
166151 Points ∼72% -3%
LG V30
173749 Points ∼75% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼72% -4%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points ∼77% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼77% +3%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points ∼64%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6443 Points ∼62% -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5085 Points ∼49% -23%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6994 Points ∼68% +6%
LG V30
5603 Points ∼54% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5195 Points ∼50% -21%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points ∼64% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼67% +5%
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points ∼80%
Sony Xperia XZ1
7056 Points ∼73% -9%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
6264 Points ∼65% -19%
Google Pixel 2 XL
8258 Points ∼86% +7%
LG V30
6854 Points ∼71% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼61% -25%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points ∼81% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼88% +9%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points ∼78%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1181 Points ∼70% -11%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
766 Points ∼45% -42%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1186 Points ∼70% -11%
LG V30
1009 Points ∼59% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼69% -12%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points ∼76% -3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼73% -7%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points ∼66%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5923 Points ∼64% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1496 Points ∼16% -75%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6142 Points ∼66% +1%
LG V30
5949 Points ∼64% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼66% 0%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points ∼66% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼40% -40%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points ∼87%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1752 Points ∼40% -54%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1380 Points ∼31% -64%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2927 Points ∼66% -24%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼47% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼71% -18%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points ∼100% +15%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼94% +8%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points ∼57%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5840 Points ∼57% -1%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3319 Points ∼32% -43%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5914 Points ∼58% +1%
LG V30
4238 Points ∼41% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼52% -9%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points ∼57% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼51% -11%
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points ∼85%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2909 Points ∼68% -21%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1513 Points ∼35% -59%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3351 Points ∼78% -9%
LG V30
2702 Points ∼63% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼77% -10%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points ∼88% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼73% -14%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
8000 Points ∼56%
Sony Xperia XZ1
7979 Points ∼56% 0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3942 Points ∼27% -51%
Google Pixel 2 XL
7568 Points ∼53% -5%
LG V30
8016 Points ∼56% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
8295 Points ∼58% +4%
OnePlus 5
8005 Points ∼56% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼60% +7%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points ∼23%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6493 Points ∼22% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
4172 Points ∼14% -37%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6253 Points ∼22% -6%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼21% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼23% 0%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points ∼24% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼24% +2%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points ∼33%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1856 Points ∼31% -5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
865 Points ∼15% -56%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1916 Points ∼32% -2%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼32% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼34% +3%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points ∼33% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼32% -3%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points ∼84%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2928 Points ∼80% -5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1751 Points ∼48% -43%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3028 Points ∼83% -1%
LG V30
2931 Points ∼80% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼67% -20%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points ∼82% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼78% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points ∼75%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3961 Points ∼74% -1%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
726 Points ∼13% -82%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3872 Points ∼72% -4%
LG V30
3903 Points ∼72% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼65% -13%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points ∼70% -6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼53% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points ∼79%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3673 Points ∼78% -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
835 Points ∼18% -78%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3646 Points ∼77% -3%
LG V30
3635 Points ∼77% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼67% -15%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points ∼75% -5%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼60% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points ∼83%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2564 Points ∼70% -15%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1785 Points ∼49% -41%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2995 Points ∼82% -1%
LG V30
2808 Points ∼77% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points ∼68% -19%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points ∼83% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼80% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points ∼70%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6057 Points ∼73% +5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1289 Points ∼16% -78%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5856 Points ∼71% +1%
LG V30
5895 Points ∼71% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points ∼58% -17%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points ∼58% -18%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼41% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points ∼76%
Sony Xperia XZ1
4649 Points ∼73% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1374 Points ∼22% -71%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4831 Points ∼76% 0%
LG V30
4738 Points ∼74% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points ∼62% -18%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points ∼66% -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼51% -33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points ∼27%
Sony Xperia XZ1
23046 Points ∼29% +8%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
13014 Points ∼16% -39%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20233 Points ∼26% -5%
LG V30
14601 Points ∼18% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼26% -2%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points ∼25% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼29% +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points ∼12%
Sony Xperia XZ1
47857 Points ∼10% -18%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
18386 Points ∼4% -68%
Google Pixel 2 XL
54156 Points ∼11% -7%
LG V30
55271 Points ∼12% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼7% -43%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points ∼12% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼7% -41%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points ∼20%
Sony Xperia XZ1
31618 Points ∼15% -25%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
16841 Points ∼8% -60%
Google Pixel 2 XL
39456 Points ∼19% -6%
LG V30
34139 Points ∼16% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼14% -30%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points ∼19% -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼15% -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
113 fps ∼7%
Sony Xperia XZ1
111 fps ∼6% -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
30 fps ∼2% -73%
Google Pixel 2 XL
112 fps ∼7% -1%
LG V30
113 fps ∼7% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼6% -8%
OnePlus 5
115 fps ∼7% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼7% -1%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼13%
Sony Xperia XZ1
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
29 fps ∼6% -52%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼13% -2%
LG V30
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13% -3%
OnePlus 5
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼13% 0%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼11%
Sony Xperia XZ1
56 fps ∼10% -7%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼3% -77%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼11% -2%
LG V30
59 fps ∼11% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9% -17%
OnePlus 5
61 fps ∼11% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼10% -10%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
53 fps ∼15%
Sony Xperia XZ1
52 fps ∼14% -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼4% -74%
Google Pixel 2 XL
35 fps ∼10% -34%
LG V30
35 fps ∼10% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼10% -28%
OnePlus 5
56 fps ∼15% +6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼15% +6%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
41 fps ∼8%
Sony Xperia XZ1
41 fps ∼8% 0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.7 fps ∼2% -76%
Google Pixel 2 XL
41 fps ∼8% 0%
LG V30
40 fps ∼7% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼8% +2%
OnePlus 5
42 fps ∼8% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼7% -10%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
37 fps ∼21%
Sony Xperia XZ1
42 fps ∼24% +14%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.5 fps ∼5% -74%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20 fps ∼11% -46%
LG V30
19 fps ∼11% -49%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13% -38%
OnePlus 5
41 fps ∼23% +11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼22% +3%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
25 fps ∼6%
Sony Xperia XZ1
24 fps ∼6% -4%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼1% -79%
Google Pixel 2 XL
24 fps ∼6% -4%
LG V30
24 fps ∼6% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps ∼6% 0%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼6% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼5% -16%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 5T
23 fps ∼20%
Sony Xperia XZ1
25 fps ∼21% +9%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼5% -77%
Google Pixel 2 XL
13 fps ∼11% -43%
LG V30
13 fps ∼11% -43%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps ∼11% -43%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼21% +9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼19% -4%

Legend

 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
71.6 Points ∼100% +8%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.477 Points ∼93%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
64.709 Points ∼90% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
62.198 Points ∼87% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
61.335 Points ∼86% -8%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼79% -15%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points ∼74% -20%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
28.09 Points ∼39% -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
14050 Points ∼100% +12%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points ∼89%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
11945 Points ∼85% -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
11308 Points ∼80% -10%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points ∼75% -16%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼74% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
10096 Points ∼72% -19%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
4398 Points ∼31% -65%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
9425 ms * ∼100% -204%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * ∼39% -17%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼38% -16%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
3434.1 ms * ∼36% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
3267.9 ms * ∼35% -6%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * ∼33%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
2621.7 ms * ∼28% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2236.7 ms * ∼24% +28%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
194 Points ∼100% +7%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
181 Points ∼93%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
170 Points ∼88% -6%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
161 Points ∼83% -11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points ∼81% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
154 Points ∼79% -15%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points ∼71% -24%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
95 Points ∼49% -48%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 5TSony Xperia XZ1Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KLGoogle Pixel 2 XLLG V30Samsung Galaxy S8 PlusOnePlus 5
AndroBench 3-5
-4%
-43%
4%
-25%
-6%
1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
47.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
47.2
57.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
65.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.8
71.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
Random Write 4KB
20
14.93
-25%
7.59
-62%
17.84
-11%
10.21
-49%
15.27
-24%
19.3
-3%
Random Read 4KB
138.1
156.61
13%
68.57
-50%
170.55
23%
78.17
-43%
127.18
-8%
141
2%
Sequential Write 256KB
203.4
204.43
1%
205.27
1%
195.26
-4%
193.22
-5%
194.18
-5%
201.5
-1%
Sequential Read 256KB
698.7
679.13
-3%
287.38
-59%
760.14
9%
669.48
-4%
787.6
13%
748
7%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high60 fps
Hög belastning
 36 °C35.1 °C32.2 °C 
 36.1 °C36 °C32.1 °C 
 35.4 °C34.8 °C31.7 °C 
Max: 36.1 °C
Medel: 34.4 °C
31.7 °C31.6 °C33.1 °C
31.6 °C32.1 °C33.6 °C
31.4 °C32.7 °C33.7 °C
Max: 33.7 °C
Medel: 32.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  25.7 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.240.72532.946.33137.244.44031.748.65039.648.96328.337.68027.329.910026.933.712526.732.91602445.520020.955.325020.956.631519.559.140018.568.450017.564.963017.567.480015.766.2100015.870125016.672.7160015.873.8200015.474.4250015.575.931501679.3400015.87850001671.8630016.371.5800016.371.41000016.272.41250016.464.71600016.446.3SPL28.686.3N1.165.5median 16.4OnePlus 5Tmedian 68.4Delta2.18.431.629.825.433.525.327.532.925.333.634.931.627.428.427.22727.320.828.12241.121.347.920.852.421.258.719.462.519.565.417.76817.969.717.873.517.376.517.475.416.778.717.278.718.279.917.980.517.673.517.774.317.873.817.975.918.170.818.253.13087.81.374.1median 17.9OnePlus 5median 70.81.310.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
OnePlus 5T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.58 / 1.44 / 1.53 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.17 / 8.54 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Power Consumption
-46%
-36%
-38%
-2%
4%
-28%
Idle Minimum *
0.58
0.51
12%
0.84
-45%
1.28
-121%
0.72
-24%
0.68
-17%
0.73
-26%
Idle Average *
1.44
2.16
-50%
2.31
-60%
1.87
-30%
1.37
5%
1.13
22%
1.44
-0%
Idle Maximum *
1.53
2.23
-46%
2.33
-52%
1.89
-24%
1.41
8%
1.16
24%
1.5
2%
Load Average *
3.17
7.45
-135%
4.76
-50%
3.73
-18%
3.46
-9%
4.69
-48%
6.91
-118%
Load Maximum *
8.54
9.28
-9%
6.39
25%
8.08
5%
7.83
8%
5.24
39%
8.51
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
29tim 14min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11tim 58min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13tim 19min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 17min
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-21%
-7%
-5%
6%
-2%
-17%
Reader / Idle
1754
1612
-8%
1665
-5%
1706
-3%
1914
9%
1565
-11%
1534
-13%
H.264
799
580
-27%
698
-13%
672
-16%
822
3%
742
-7%
623
-22%
WiFi v1.3
718
601
-16%
562
-22%
581
-19%
774
8%
736
3%
518
-28%
Load
257
172
-33%
286
11%
302
18%
267
4%
275
7%
247
-4%

För

+ väldigt robust metallhölje
+ stor bredd av LTE-band
+ snabb WiFi
+ snabbt UFS-2.1 minne
+ väldigt hög prestanda
+ färgkorrekt skärm
+ slimmad, uppdaterad mjukvara
+ exakt GPS
+ klar samtalskvalitet
+ alternativt mörkt tema på mjukvaran
+ väldigt bra kameror
+ ganska låg energiförbrukning
+ lång batteritid
+ fysisk knapp för notifieringar
+ bra högtalare

Emot

- ganska tung
- ingen microSD-plats
- mikrofonen förvränger höga ljud
- brist på färg vid bredare betraktningsvinklar
- ej vatten- eller dammbeständig
- blir varm under extrem belastning
- ett mycket litet tapp i prestanda vid väldigt hög belastning
Review: OnePlus 5T. Test unit provided by OnePlus.
Review: OnePlus 5T. Test unit provided by OnePlus.

OnePlus 5T är en utmärkt smartphone för den som vill satsa smart: Ett bra pris, låg energiförbrukning och ett utmärkt förhållande mellan pris och prestanda. OnePlus 5T är för tillfället en av dom snabbaste smartphones som finns att tillgå och den erbjuder också ett väldigt uthålligt batteri, bra högtalare och utmärkta kameror. Flaggskeppstelefonerna från större tillverkare erbjuder fortfarande ännu bättre kameror, till exempel så saknade vår testenhet en optiskt bildstabilisator. LTE-hastigheten hos OnePlus 5T är heller inte riktigt så snabb som hos andra smartphones, men det kommer du troligen aldrig märka. Mjukvaran tar inte upp särskilt mycket plats och tillverkaren tar bra hand om den. Telefonen borde ha bra mottagning överallt i världen och WiFi-hastigheterna är väldigt bra. Dess GPS är exakt, fingeravtrycksläsaren också och ansiktsigenkänning är en trevlig och användbar gimmick.

Enheten har en snabb lagringsenhet som erbjuder generösa 128 GB - detta kan dock inte utökas med ett microSD-kort. Bekväm att använda, en skarp skärm med rika färger och acceptabla temperaturer fulländar OnePlus 5T. Även dom som älskar föregångaren kan tänkas vilja överväga en uppdatering: Det ger dig en aningen bättre högtalare, bättre kameror och ett batteri som håller bra mycket längre. Och förstås, en modern design med tunn infattning.

Tillverkaren har lyckats skapa en utmärkt toppskikts-smartphone med knappt några tillkortakommanden och rättar till föregångarens få defekter. Lång batteritid, hög systemprestanda, bra kameror och starkt ljud hjälper alla till att göra den här telefonen till ett bra köp.

Även om OnePlus 5T inte är riktigt så infattningsfri eller tunn som Galaxy S8+ så är OnePlus 5T en utmärkt utveckling från sin föregångare som fram tills nu har lyckats hålla sig fri från missöden (till skillnad från OnePlus 5 när den släpptes). Så vi kan utan tvekan säga: Flaggskeppsdödaren är tillbaka!

OnePlus 5T - 01/03/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Design
91%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 90%
Mus
96%
Anslutningar
53 / 60 → 88%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
94%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
64 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
68 / 70 → 98%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
85%
Medel
82%
91%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: OnePlus 5T Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2018-01-18 (Update: 2018-01-18)