Test: Motorola Moto G9 Power - Motorola-telefon med uthålligt batteri (Sammanfattning)

Name: Motorola Moto G9 Power
Brand: Motorola

Omladdat batteri. Mer batteri för pengarna: det är tanken bakom Motorolas Moto G9 Power. Den har blivit bättre på en del områden jämfört med sin föregångare, men nedskärningar har också skett. Vi får se om det är tillräckligt för att den här mittenskiktaren ska kunna imponera även i år.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 03/08/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Motorola Moto G9 Power (Moto G9 Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Kryo 260

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Minne

4 GB

Skärm

6.80 tum 20.5:9, 1640 x 720 pixlar 263 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz

Hårddisk

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

, 108 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 512 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.7 x 172.1 x 76.5

Batteri

6000 mAh Litiumpolymer, 20 Watt snabbladdning - Motorola TurboPower

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operativsystem

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/1.8, fasjämförande AF, LED-blixt, video @1080p/60fps (kamera 1); 2.0 MP, f/2.4, makrolins (kamera 2); 2.0 MP, f/2.4, skärpedjup (kamera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.2, video @1080p/30fps

Övrigt

Högtalare: Monohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, SIM-verktyg, Laddare, USB-kabel, Silikonhölje, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: 0.53 W/kg (huvud), 1.03 W/kg (kropp); LTE Cat 13/5 (400 Mbps/75 Mbps); FM-radio; IP52-certifierad, fanless

Vikt

221 g, Strömförsörjning: 80 g

Pris

200 Kr

Länkar

Motorola hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Testgrupp

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
77.4 %	03/2021	Motorola Moto G9 Power SD 662, Adreno 610	221 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.80"	1640x720
78.1 %	03/2020	Motorola Moto G8 Power SD 665, Adreno 610	197 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.40"	2300x1080
77.2 %	10/2020	Realme 7i Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2	208 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720
79.7 %	04/2020	Samsung Galaxy M21 Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3	188 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080
78 %	01/2021	Xiaomi Poco M3 SD 662, Adreno 610	198 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.53"	2340x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Realme 7i Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	352 (319^min - 359^max) MBit/s +29%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	304 (285^min - 323^max) MBit/s +11%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	284 (186^min - 366^max) MBit/s +4%
Motorola Moto G9 Power Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB eMMC Flash	273 (180^min - 335^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G8 Power Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44.9 (2^min - 75^max) MBit/s -84%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s +43%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	332 (231^min - 352^max) MBit/s +26%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	301 (209^min - 341^max) MBit/s +14%
Realme 7i Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	288 (261^min - 319^max) MBit/s +10%
Motorola Moto G9 Power Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB eMMC Flash	263 (168^min - 324^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G8 Power Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	56.5 (11^min - 75^max) MBit/s -79%

Motorola Moto G9 Power; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø263 (168-324)

Motorola Moto G9 Power; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø273 (180-335)

Garmin Edge 520 Positionering – Översikt

Motorola Moto G9 Power Positionering – Översikt

Motorola Moto G9 Power Positionering – Vägskäl

Motorola Moto G9 Power Positionering – Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main lens - Flower Main lens - Surroundings Main lens - Low light

click to load images

Motorola Moto G9 Power

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

OnePlus 8T

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Motorola Moto G9 Power

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

OnePlus 8T

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Motorola Moto G9 Power

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

OnePlus 8T

Canon EOS 600D

ColorChecker Motorola Moto G9 Power: 8.98 ∆E min: 0.95 - max: 15.28 ∆E


353 cd/m²	370 cd/m²	376 cd/m²
365 cd/m²	414 cd/m²	386 cd/m²
352 cd/m²	364 cd/m²	374 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 414 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 372.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.3 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 414 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1294:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.377

	Motorola Moto G9 Power IPS, 1640x720, 6.80	Motorola Moto G8 Power IPS, 2300x1080, 6.40	Realme 7i IPS, 1600x720, 6.50	Samsung Galaxy M21 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40	Xiaomi Poco M3 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Screen		-63%	-68%	26%	24%
Brightness middle	414	462 12%	597 44%	617 49%	465 12%
Brightness	373	483 29%	569 53%	614 65%	428 15%
Brightness Distribution	85	93 9%	91 7%	95 12%	89 5%
Black Level *	0.32	0.65 -103%	0.74 -131%		0.21 34%
Contrast	1294	711 -45%	807 -38%		2214 71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.41	5.7 -137%	5.47 -127%	2.11 12%	1.7 29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.35	8.9 -105%	12.11 -178%	3.41 22%	3.5 20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	6.5 -160%	6.9 -176%	2.6 -4%	2.4 4%
Gamma	2.377 ^93%	2.303 ^96%	2.363 ^93%	2.073 ^106%	2.16 ^102%
CCT	6280 ^104%	8073 ^81%	8091 ^80%	6921 ^94%	6664 ^98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

500 Hz

≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23 ms rise
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	314 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	311 Points -1%
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	354 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	349 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	316 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (275 - 316, n=13)	308 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)	911 Points +190%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1420 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1385 Points -2%
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1305 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1322 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1275 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (763 - 1453, n=13)	1299 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)	2988 Points +110%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	475 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1163 Points +145%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1208 Points +154%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (442 - 498, n=5)	466 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 9992, n=85, last 2 years)	4251 Points +795%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	370 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1185 Points +220%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1565 Points +323%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (345 - 376, n=8)	367 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (434 - 10711, n=77, last 2 years)	4053 Points +995%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	8714 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8804 Points +1%
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	11889 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	6043 Points -31%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	7247 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (7247 - 8714, n=8)	7986 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +73%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	6425 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6963 Points +8%
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	8655 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5892 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	6042 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (5866 - 7184, n=9)	6258 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +69%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	25046 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	22619 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23670 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	22329 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (22131 - 22897, n=4)	22483 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	25161 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	25311 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	25024 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	23495 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (23379 - 24043, n=4)	23648 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24652 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	16484 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	19902 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	19025 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (18647 - 19804, n=4)	19225 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1764 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1838 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2110 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1797 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1797 - 1889, n=9)	1842 Points
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1626 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1697 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2092 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1715 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1681 - 1765, n=9)	1728 Points
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2507 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2590 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2176 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2161 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2161 - 2543, n=9)	2407 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1809 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1844 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1662 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1861 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1819 - 1914, n=9)	1876 Points
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1678 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1693 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1601 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1779 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1737 - 1794, n=9)	1775 Points
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2493 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2684 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1917 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2221 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2146 - 2502, n=9)	2330 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1137 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1400 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1563 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1173 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1106 - 1905, n=12)	1220 Points
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=106, last 2 years)	2738 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	984 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1237 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1445 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1022 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (974 - 1074, n=12)	1017 Points
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=106, last 2 years)	2733 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2493 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2600 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2186 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2424 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2108 - 2513, n=12)	2368 Points
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=106, last 2 years)	3156 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1151 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1411 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1650 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1176 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (740 - 1197, n=12)	1135 Points
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=183, last 2 years)	6705 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	988 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1243 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1532 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1032 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (642 - 1081, n=12)	999 Points
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=182, last 2 years)	9675 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2488 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2681 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2260 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2298 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1588 - 2534, n=12)	2240 Points
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=182, last 2 years)	4216 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1047 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1391 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1550 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1096 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1089 - 1167, n=12)	1115 Points
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6439, n=100, last 2 years)	2654 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	904 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1234 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1439 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	963 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (946 - 1005, n=12)	973 Points
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=100, last 2 years)	2829 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2354 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2513 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2125 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2124 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2124 - 2499, n=12)	2292 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 3525, n=100, last 2 years)	2672 Points
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	375 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	706 Points +88%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	369 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (369 - 391, n=11)	378 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (395 - 9839, n=136, last 2 years)	2540 Points +577%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	366 Points
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	698 Points +91%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	369 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (366 - 382, n=8)	370 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 20068, n=204, last 2 years)	6251 Points +1608%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	49 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	33 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	31 fps -37%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	32 fps -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (29 - 51, n=10)	39 fps -20%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +73%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	35 fps -3%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	35 fps -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (34 - 36, n=10)	35.1 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +586%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	34 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	18 fps -47%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	19 fps -44%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	17 fps -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (16 - 34, n=10)	25.4 fps -25%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +112%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	19 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	18 fps -5%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	19 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (19 - 21, n=10)	19.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +640%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	26 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	12 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps -46%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	12 fps -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11 - 26, n=10)	18.8 fps -28%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +134%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16 fps +23%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (13 - 14, n=10)	13.1 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +662%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6.6 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.9 fps -32%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	6.4 fps -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (6 - 14, n=10)	9.88 fps -24%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +234%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	7.2 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.1 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps +39%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	7.1 fps -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (7 - 7.3, n=10)	7.16 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +732%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	15 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.6 fps -49%
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	18 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9.2 fps -39%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	7.5 fps -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4.8 - 15, n=13)	10.5 fps -30%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=227, last 2 years)	43.9 fps +193%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	8.6 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.1 fps -6%
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	9.7 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps +16%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	8.3 fps -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (7.4 - 8.6, n=13)	8.27 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=227, last 2 years)	64 fps +644%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	9 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4.5 fps -50%
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	12 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5.6 fps -38%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	4.4 fps -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2.9 - 9.6, n=13)	6.43 fps -29%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=227, last 2 years)	32.7 fps +263%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps 0%
Realme 7i Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	3.5 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.5 fps +25%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2.5 - 2.9, n=13)	2.78 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=227, last 2 years)	25.5 fps +811%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	178514 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	168901 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	180019 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	183808 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (167471 - 185542, n=9)	177411 Points -1%

AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	4672 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	4660 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4660 - 15832, n=7)	9448 Points +102%
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)	21146 Points +353%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2352 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2238 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2133 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2412 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2243 - 2432, n=11)	2337 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +145%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	4854 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4848 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4586 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	4834 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4275 - 5001, n=11)	4862 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +99%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	2991 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2864 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1759 Points -41%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	3454 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2618 - 3454, n=11)	3039 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +110%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1850 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1931 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2138 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1847 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1773 - 1887, n=11)	1839 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +669%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1140 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	935 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy M21 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1200 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096	1098 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1023 - 1228, n=11)	1116 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +31%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +241%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)	32.04 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (30.4 - 32.4, n=10)	31.5 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chrome 88)	31.14 Points
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)	30.64 Points -2%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points +114%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (47.8 - 53.7, n=9)	49.9 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)	49.5 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)	49.46 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chrome 88)	48.82 Points
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	48.11 Points -1%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +285%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)	29.2 runs/min +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (26.5 - 29.3, n=9)	28.4 runs/min +2%
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chome 88)	27.8 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chome 85)	26.6 runs/min -4%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +156%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	56 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)	55 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (51 - 59, n=11)	53.2 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)	53 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chrome 88)	52 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)	33357 Points +258%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)	9810 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (8893 - 10247, n=14)	9495 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chrome 88)	9330 Points
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)	9125 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	8675 Points -7%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)	4664 ms * -3%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)	4664 ms * -3%
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chrome 88)	4549 ms *
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)	4537 ms * -0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (3779 - 4650, n=11)	4379 ms * +4%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +65%

* ... smaller is better

	Motorola Moto G9 Power	Motorola Moto G8 Power	Realme 7i	Samsung Galaxy M21	Xiaomi Poco M3	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		13%	8%	35%	58%	-9%	348%
Sequential Read 256KB	299.8	300.9 0%	316.4 6%	487.8 63%	509 70%	283 ?(106.7 - 511, n=74) -6%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 403%
Sequential Write 256KB	227.2	181.9 -20%	187.2 -18%	192.7 -15%	269.2 18%	193 ?(72.3 - 314, n=74) -15%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 392%
Random Read 4KB	131.9	57.7 -56%	77.4 -41%	126 -4%	147 11%	82.4 ?(8.63 - 247, n=74) -38%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 87%
Random Write 4KB	44.6	132.6 197%	89.5 101%	124.2 178%	154.1 246%	54 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=74) 21%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 510%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	85.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	69.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -19%	83.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	77.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%	85.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	78.1 ?(29.2 - 153.8, n=34) -9%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	64.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	49.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -23%	63.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	62.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	64.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	61.8 ?(26.1 - 81.9, n=34) -4%

Motorola Moto G9 Power; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 2.1.0.3849: Ø59.9 (56-60)

Motorola Moto G9 Power; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 2.1.0.3849: Ø59.3 (51-60)

Motorola Moto G9 Power; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.2.0: Ø29.5 (21-31)

Motorola Moto G9 Power; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.2.0: Ø24.7 (19-26)

3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Moto G9 Power Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB eMMC Flash	99.7 %
Xiaomi Poco M3 Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 % 0%

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


43.5 °C	38.8 °C	37 °C
43 °C	38.9 °C	37.4 °C
41.5 °C	37.7 °C	37.1 °C

Max: 43.5 °C
Medel: 39.4 °C


35.4 °C	37.4 °C	40.7 °C
36.3 °C	37.8 °C	41.3 °C
36.9 °C	38.3 °C	40.4 °C

Max: 41.3 °C
Medel: 38.3 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 38.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Moto G9 Power audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (115.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (125.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastning	0.8 / 1.9 / 2.6 Watt
Hög belastning	5.3 / 7.6 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Motorola Moto G9 Power 6000 mAh	Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy M21 6000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco M3 6000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		21%	-9%	23%	-6%	7%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	0.9 -13%	1.2 -50%	0.5 37%	0.846 ?(0.49 - 1.38, n=10) -6%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -12%
Idle Average *	1.9	1.3 32%	1.8 5%	1.84 3%	2.51 ?(1.5 - 4.92, n=10) -32%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 24%
Idle Maximum *	2.6	1.6 38%	2.1 19%	1.87 28%	2.72 ?(1.63 - 4.95, n=10) -5%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 37%
Load Average *	5.3	3.2 40%	6.2 -17%	3.99 25%	4.99 ?(3 - 7.21, n=10) 6%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -5%
Load Maximum *	7.6	7.1 7%	7.9 -4%	6.01 21%	7.16 ?(5.2 - 9.32, n=10) 6%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -9%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		42tim 20min
WiFi Websurfing		19tim 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		20tim 45min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		5tim 15min

	Motorola Moto G9 Power 6000 mAh	Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh	Realme 7i 6000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy M21 6000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco M3 6000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-14%	12%	1%	9%
Reader / Idle	2540			2297 -10%	2756 9%
H.264	1245			1352 9%	1164 -7%
WiFi v1.3	1165	1002 -14%	1307 12%	1298 11%	1249 7%
Load	315			289 -8%	404 28%

För

+ Gediget positioneringssystem

+ Tar bra bilder av saker

+ Ganska exakt färgåtergivning

+ Lång batteritid

+ NFC

+ Skapligt ren Android

Emot

- Ganska mörk skärm

- Miljöfoton har medelmåttig skärpa

- Har ej 90 Hz bilduppdatering

- Ganska tung

Omdöme – En gedigen mittenskiktstelefon

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Moto G9 Power är en framgångsrik uppdatering av den tidigare modellen och har snabbare WiFi, mer lagring och framför allt, bättre batteritid. Det är irriterande att prestandan har minskat en aning, men det går att acceptera med tanke på priset.

Positioneringssystemet gör sitt jobb väl och kameran tar fina foton av objekt men saknar skärpa på landskapsbilder. Skärmen kunde varit mer ljusstark och haft högre upplösning, men den återger åtminstone färger ganska bra.

Motorola Moto G9 Power har lång batteritid och är utan större svagheter, men den lyckas heller inte riktigt stå ut från mängden.

Moto G9 Power har starka konkurrenter och det finns många andra telefoner i det här prisskiktet som kommer med batterier på 6.000 mAh. Moto G9 Power lyckas inte riktigt stå ut från mängden och det finns dessutom en del smartphones som har ännu längre batteritid.

Men Moto G9 Power är ett gediget val för den som letar efter en stor telefon utan större svagheter som dessutom kommer med en ganska ren version av Android.

Motorola Moto G9 Power - 2021-03-04 03/04/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design

82%

Tangentbord

66 / 75 → 88%

Mus

93%

Anslutningar

45 / 70 → 64%

Vikt

88%

Batteri

92%

Skärm

85%

Spelprestanda

11 / 64 → 17%

Programprestanda

58 / 86 → 67%

Temperatur

87%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

64 / 90 → 71%

Camera

56%

Medel

71%

77%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 571 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Motorola Moto G9 Power - Motorola-telefon med uthålligt batteri (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 2021-03- 8 (Update: 2021-03- 8)

Test: Motorola Moto G9 Power - Motorola-telefon med uthålligt batteri (Sammanfattning)

Testgrupp

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Motorola Moto G9 Power audio analysis

Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme – En gedigen mittenskiktstelefon

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare