Notebookcheck

Test: Motorola Moto G9 Power - Motorola-telefon med uthålligt batteri (Sammanfattning)

Omladdat batteri. Mer batteri för pengarna: det är tanken bakom Motorolas Moto G9 Power. Den har blivit bättre på en del områden jämfört med sin föregångare, men nedskärningar har också skett. Vi får se om det är tillräckligt för att den här mittenskiktaren ska kunna imponera även i år.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Moto G9 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Kryo 260
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.80 tum 20.5:9, 1640 x 720 pixlar 263 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 512 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.7 x 172.1 x 76.5
Batteri
6000 mAh Litiumpolymer, 20 Watt snabbladdning - Motorola TurboPower
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.8, fasjämförande AF, LED-blixt, video @1080p/​60fps (kamera 1); 2.0 MP, f/​2.4, makrolins (kamera 2); 2.0 MP, f/​2.4, skärpedjup (kamera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.2, video @1080p/​30fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, SIM-verktyg, Laddare, USB-kabel, Silikonhölje, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: 0.53 W/​kg (huvud), 1.03 W/​kg (kropp); LTE Cat 13/​5 (400 Mbps/​75 Mbps); FM-radio; IP52-certifierad, fanless
Vikt
221 g, Strömförsörjning: 80 g
Pris
200 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
sökrelation
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
77 %
03/2021
Motorola Moto G9 Power
SD 662, Adreno 610
221 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.80"1640x720
78 %
03/2020
Motorola Moto G8 Power
SD 665, Adreno 610
197 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2300x1080
77 %
10/2020
realme 7i
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
208 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
80 %
04/2020
Samsung Galaxy M21
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
188 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2340x1080
78 %
01/2021
Xiaomi Poco M3
SD 662, Adreno 610
198 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.53"2340x1080
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Motorola Moto G9 Power

Storleksjämförelse

172.1 mm 76.5 mm 9.7 mm 221 g164.1 mm 75.5 mm 9.8 mm 208 g162.3 mm 77.3 mm 9.6 mm 198 g159 mm 75.1 mm 8.9 mm 188 g156 mm 76 mm 10 mm 197 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=303, last 2 years)
415 MBit/s ∼100% +52%
realme 7i
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
352 (319min - 359max) MBit/s ∼85% +29%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
304 (285min - 323max) MBit/s ∼73% +11%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
284 (186min - 366max) MBit/s ∼68% +4%
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB eMMC Flash
273 (180min - 335max) MBit/s ∼66%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.9 (2min - 75max) MBit/s ∼11% -84%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=303, last 2 years)
419 MBit/s ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
332 (231min - 352max) MBit/s ∼79% +26%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
301 (209min - 341max) MBit/s ∼72% +14%
realme 7i
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
288 (261min - 319max) MBit/s ∼69% +10%
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB eMMC Flash
263 (168min - 324max) MBit/s ∼63%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56.5 (11min - 75max) MBit/s ∼13% -79%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320323262195237225214168227314279223258311324206232288312193255293316237245310321292216315302323262195237225214168227314279223258311324206232288312193255293316237245310321292216315302180286335294213208310335244254302326195263313315232234262309263262326296278249286321295191Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø263 (168-324)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø273 (180-335)
Garmin Edge 520 Positionering – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 Positionering – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 Positionering – Vägskäl
Garmin Edge 520 Positionering – Vägskäl
Garmin Edge 520 Positionering – Bro
Garmin Edge 520 Positionering – Bro
Motorola Moto G9 Power Positionering – Översikt
Motorola Moto G9 Power Positionering – Översikt
Motorola Moto G9 Power Positionering – Vägskäl
Motorola Moto G9 Power Positionering – Vägskäl
Motorola Moto G9 Power Positionering – Bro
Motorola Moto G9 Power Positionering – Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main lens - FlowerMain lens - SurroundingsMain lens - Low light
ColorChecker
15 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
9 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
1 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
3 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G9 Power: 8.98 ∆E min: 0.95 - max: 15.28 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
52.4 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
51.8 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
28 ∆E
64 ∆E
63.4 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
74.9 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
76.4 ∆E
69.1 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G9 Power: 45.55 ∆E min: 13.76 - max: 76.4 ∆E
353
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 414 cd/m² Medel: 372.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.3 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 414 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1294:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.41 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
94% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.377
Motorola Moto G9 Power
IPS, 1640x720, 6.80
Motorola Moto G8 Power
IPS, 2300x1080, 6.40
realme 7i
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy M21
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40
Xiaomi Poco M3
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Screen
-63%
-68%
26%
24%
Brightness middle
414
462
12%
597
44%
617
49%
465
12%
Brightness
373
483
29%
569
53%
614
65%
428
15%
Brightness Distribution
85
93
9%
91
7%
95
12%
89
5%
Black Level *
0.32
0.65
-103%
0.74
-131%
0.21
34%
Contrast
1294
711
-45%
807
-38%
2214
71%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.41
5.7
-137%
5.47
-127%
2.11
12%
1.7
29%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.35
8.9
-105%
12.11
-178%
3.41
22%
3.5
20%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
6.5
-160%
6.9
-176%
2.6
-4%
2.4
4%
Gamma
2.377 93%
2.303 96%
2.363 93%
2.073 106%
2.16 102%
CCT
6280 104%
8073 81%
8091 80%
6921 94%
6664 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 500 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 14825 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.1 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
314 Points ∼55%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
311 Points ∼55% -1%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
354 Points ∼63% +13%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
349 Points ∼62% +11%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
316 Points ∼56% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (305 - 316, n=8)
312 Points ∼55% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=234, last 2 years)
566 Points ∼100% +80%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1420 Points ∼73%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1385 Points ∼71% -2%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1305 Points ∼67% -8%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1322 Points ∼68% -7%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1275 Points ∼66% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1234 - 1453, n=8)
1355 Points ∼70% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=234, last 2 years)
1940 Points ∼100% +37%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
475 Points ∼23%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1163 Points ∼57% +145%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1208 Points ∼59% +154%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (442 - 498, n=4)
466 Points ∼23% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=124, last 2 years)
2053 Points ∼100% +332%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
370 Points ∼17%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1185 Points ∼55% +220%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1565 Points ∼73% +323%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (345 - 376, n=6)
366 Points ∼17% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=128, last 2 years)
2141 Points ∼100% +479%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
8714 Points ∼73%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8804 Points ∼74% +1%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11889 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6043 Points ∼51% -31%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7247 Points ∼61% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7247 - 8714, n=8)
7986 Points ∼67% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=223, last 2 years)
9982 Points ∼84% +15%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
6425 Points ∼74%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6963 Points ∼80% +8%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8655 Points ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5892 Points ∼68% -8%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
6042 Points ∼70% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (5866 - 7184, n=9)
6258 Points ∼72% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=267, last 2 years)
7878 Points ∼91% +23%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25046 Points ∼62%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
22619 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23670 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
22329 Points ∼55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (22131 - 22897, n=4)
22483 Points ∼56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=207, last 2 years)
40247 Points ∼100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25161 Points ∼43%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
25311 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25024 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
23495 Points ∼40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (23379 - 24043, n=4)
23648 Points ∼41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=207, last 2 years)
58049 Points ∼100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24652 Points ∼100%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16484 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
19902 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
19025 Points ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (18647 - 19804, n=4)
19225 Points ∼78%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=207, last 2 years)
23323 Points ∼95%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1764 Points ∼52%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1838 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2110 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1797 Points ∼53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1797 - 1889, n=7)
1846 Points ∼55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=260, last 2 years)
3369 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1626 Points ∼41%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1697 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2092 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1715 Points ∼43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1681 - 1765, n=7)
1732 Points ∼44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=260, last 2 years)
3943 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2507 Points ∼91%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2590 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2176 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2161 Points ∼78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2161 - 2543, n=7)
2412 Points ∼88%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=260, last 2 years)
2756 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1809 Points ∼46%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1844 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1662 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1861 Points ∼47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1819 - 1914, n=7)
1879 Points ∼48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=276, last 2 years)
3948 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1678 Points ∼34%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1693 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1601 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1779 Points ∼36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1737 - 1794, n=7)
1777 Points ∼36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=276, last 2 years)
4986 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points ∼86%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2684 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1917 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2221 Points ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2146 - 2502, n=7)
2334 Points ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=274, last 2 years)
2908 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1137 Points ∼43%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1400 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1563 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1173 Points ∼45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1151 - 1905, n=7)
1276 Points ∼49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=258, last 2 years)
2629 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
984 Points ∼35%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1237 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1445 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1022 Points ∼37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (998 - 1074, n=7)
1027 Points ∼37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=258, last 2 years)
2786 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points ∼89%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2600 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2186 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2424 Points ∼87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2351 - 2513, n=7)
2456 Points ∼88%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=258, last 2 years)
2802 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1151 Points ∼36%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1411 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1650 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1176 Points ∼37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1124 - 1197, n=7)
1172 Points ∼37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=274, last 2 years)
3193 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
988 Points ∼28%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1243 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1532 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1032 Points ∼29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (980 - 1081, n=7)
1032 Points ∼29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=274, last 2 years)
3570 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2488 Points ∼84%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2681 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2260 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2298 Points ∼78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2164 - 2534, n=7)
2340 Points ∼79%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=274, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1047 Points ∼40%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1391 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1550 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1096 Points ∼42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1096 - 1167, n=7)
1120 Points ∼42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=215, last 2 years)
2636 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
904 Points ∼31%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1234 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1439 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
963 Points ∼33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (963 - 1005, n=7)
978 Points ∼33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=215, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2354 Points ∼89%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2513 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2125 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2124 Points ∼80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2124 - 2499, n=7)
2300 Points ∼87%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=215, last 2 years)
2651 Points ∼100%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
375 Points ∼14%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
706 Points ∼26% +88%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
369 Points ∼13% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (369 - 385, n=6)
376 Points ∼14% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=90, last 2 years)
2754 Points ∼100% +634%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
366 Points ∼12%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
698 Points ∼24% +91%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
369 Points ∼12% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (366 - 369, n=3)
367 Points ∼12% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=87, last 2 years)
2964 Points ∼100% +710%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
49 fps ∼86%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
33 fps ∼58% -33%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
31 fps ∼54% -37%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
32 fps ∼56% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (29 - 51, n=8)
38.9 fps ∼68% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=215, last 2 years)
57 fps ∼100% +16%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼34%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼34% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
35 fps ∼33% -3%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
35 fps ∼33% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (34 - 36, n=8)
35.1 fps ∼33% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=215, last 2 years)
106 fps ∼100% +194%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼76%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18 fps ∼40% -47%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
19 fps ∼42% -44%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
17 fps ∼38% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (17 - 34, n=8)
25.6 fps ∼57% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=213, last 2 years)
45 fps ∼100% +32%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼31%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼31% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
18 fps ∼29% -5%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼31% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (19 - 21, n=8)
19.4 fps ∼31% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=214, last 2 years)
62 fps ∼100% +226%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
26 fps ∼73%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼34% -54%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼40% -46%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼34% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (12 - 26, n=8)
19 fps ∼54% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=212, last 2 years)
35.4 fps ∼100% +36%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼31%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼31% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16 fps ∼38% +23%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼31% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (13 - 14, n=8)
13.1 fps ∼31% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=212, last 2 years)
42.5 fps ∼100% +227%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼59%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.6 fps ∼30% -49%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼40% -32%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
6.4 fps ∼29% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (6.4 - 14, n=8)
9.98 fps ∼45% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=211, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼100% +71%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7.2 fps ∼28%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼28% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼39% +39%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼28% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7 - 7.3, n=8)
7.18 fps ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=211, last 2 years)
25.5 fps ∼100% +254%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼68%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps ∼34% -49%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
18 fps ∼81% +20%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.2 fps ∼41% -39%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7.5 fps ∼34% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7.5 - 15, n=8)
11.2 fps ∼50% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=280, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼100% +48%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
8.6 fps ∼34%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼32% -6%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.7 fps ∼38% +13%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼39% +16%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
8.3 fps ∼32% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (8.2 - 8.6, n=8)
8.4 fps ∼33% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=279, last 2 years)
25.6 fps ∼100% +198%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
9 fps ∼61%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps ∼30% -50%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼81% +33%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.6 fps ∼38% -38%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4.4 fps ∼30% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4.4 - 9.6, n=8)
6.91 fps ∼47% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=280, last 2 years)
14.8 fps ∼100% +64%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼28%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼28% 0%
realme 7i
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.5 fps ∼35% +25%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼35% +25%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼28% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2.6 - 2.9, n=8)
2.79 fps ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=279, last 2 years)
10.1 fps ∼100% +261%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
178514 Points ∼54%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
168901 Points ∼51% -5%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
180019 Points ∼54% +1%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
183808 Points ∼55% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (167471 - 185542, n=8)
177515 Points ∼54% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=186, last 2 years)
331491 Points ∼100% +86%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4672 Points ∼8%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4660 Points ∼8% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4660 - 15832, n=6)
8392 Points ∼14% +80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 264766, n=64, last 2 years)
58995 Points ∼100% +1163%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2352 Points ∼65%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2238 Points ∼62% -5%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2133 Points ∼59% -9%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2412 Points ∼67% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2243 - 2432, n=9)
2345 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=198, last 2 years)
3625 Points ∼100% +54%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4854 Points ∼73%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4848 Points ∼73% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4586 Points ∼69% -6%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4834 Points ∼73% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4275 - 5001, n=9)
4853 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=198, last 2 years)
6635 Points ∼100% +37%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2991 Points ∼71%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2864 Points ∼68% -4%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1759 Points ∼41% -41%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
3454 Points ∼81% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2618 - 3454, n=9)
3062 Points ∼72% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=198, last 2 years)
4241 Points ∼100% +42%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1850 Points ∼33%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1931 Points ∼34% +4%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2138 Points ∼38% +16%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1847 Points ∼33% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1773 - 1887, n=9)
1844 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=198, last 2 years)
5613 Points ∼100% +203%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1140 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
935 Points ∼74% -18%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1200 Points ∼94% +5%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1098 Points ∼86% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1034 - 1228, n=9)
1124 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=198, last 2 years)
1272 Points ∼100% +12%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=184, last 2 years)
50 Points ∼100% +61%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
32.041 Points ∼64% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (30.4 - 32.4, n=9)
31.5 Points ∼63% +1%
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chrome 88)
31.138 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
30.642 Points ∼61% -2%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=192, last 2 years)
89.7 Points ∼100% +84%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
49.497 Points ∼55% +1%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
49.459 Points ∼55% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (47.8 - 49.7, n=7)
49.2 Points ∼55% +1%
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chrome 88)
48.818 Points ∼54%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
48.109 Points ∼54% -1%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=165, last 2 years)
50.7 runs/min ∼100% +82%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
29.2 runs/min ∼58% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (26.5 - 29.3, n=8)
28.3 runs/min ∼56% +2%
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chome 88)
27.8 runs/min ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chome 85)
26.6 runs/min ∼52% -4%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=202, last 2 years)
78 Points ∼100% +50%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
56 Points ∼72% +8%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
55 Points ∼71% +6%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
53 Points ∼68% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (51 - 59, n=9)
52.7 Points ∼68% +1%
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chrome 88)
52 Points ∼67%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=209, last 2 years)
17325 Points ∼100% +86%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
9810 Points ∼57% +5%
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chrome 88)
9330 Points ∼54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (8893 - 9879, n=9)
9305 Points ∼54% 0%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
9125 Points ∼53% -2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
8675 Points ∼50% -7%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
4664.3 ms * ∼100% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
4663.6 ms * ∼100% -3%
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chrome 88)
4549 ms * ∼98%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
4536.9 ms * ∼97% -0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4322 - 4650, n=9)
4508 ms * ∼97% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=211, last 2 years)
3999 ms * ∼86% +12%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G9 PowerMotorola Moto G8 Powerrealme 7iSamsung Galaxy M21Xiaomi Poco M3Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
13%
8%
35%
58%
-12%
58%
Sequential Read 256KB
299.8
300.9
0%
316.4
6%
487.8
63%
509.23
70%
289 (107 - 501, n=37)
-4%
752 (41.9 - 2037, n=285, last 2 years)
151%
Sequential Write 256KB
227.2
181.88
-20%
187.2
-18%
192.7
-15%
269.2
18%
191 (90 - 314, n=37)
-16%
327 (11.9 - 1321, n=285, last 2 years)
44%
Random Read 4KB
131.9
57.7
-56%
77.4
-41%
126
-4%
147.03
11%
77.1 (20.7 - 247, n=37)
-42%
134 (13.5 - 325, n=285, last 2 years)
2%
Random Write 4KB
44.6
132.63
197%
89.5
101%
124.2
178%
154.1
246%
44.9 (8.48 - 151, n=37)
1%
120 (4.97 - 330, n=285, last 2 years)
169%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
69.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-19%
83.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
77.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
85.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
78 (29.2 - 154, n=33)
-9%
75.9 (13.4 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
49.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-23%
63.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
64.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
62.5 (26.1 - 81.9, n=33)
-3%
58.2 (8.4 - 83.3, n=175, last 2 years)
-9%
0510152025303540455055606060596060606060606060606060606060606060605959605660606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606059606060606060606060606060606060606060586060605960606060606060606060606055606060515960595960605860606060606060605960606052596060605955586055596060606060605960606060606060606060606060606060606059596056606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060596060606060606060606060606060606060605860606059606060606060606060606060556060605159605959606058606060606060606059606060525960606059555860555960606060302830302630303030302930302930293029283030293029302929303029293030293030303130302930213030293030293129303030303030303060605960606060606060606060606060606060606059596056606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060596060606060606060606060606060606060605860606059606060606060606060606060556060605159605959606058606060606060606059606060525960606059555860555960606060302830302630303030302930302930293029283030293029302929303029293030293030303130302930213030293030293129303030303030303025252525242419252426252525252525252525242526252524262524262425252426242421262624252525252525252524242623252525242425Tooltip
; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 2.1.0.3849: Ø59.9 (56-60)
; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 2.1.0.3849: Ø59.3 (51-60)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.2.0: Ø29.5 (21-31)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.2.0: Ø24.7 (19-26)
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Moto G9 Power
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.7 % ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % ∼100% 0%
Hög belastning
 43.5 °C38.8 °C37 °C 
 43 °C38.9 °C37.4 °C 
 41.5 °C37.7 °C37.1 °C 
Max: 43.5 °C
Medel: 39.4 °C
35.4 °C37.4 °C40.7 °C
36.3 °C37.8 °C41.3 °C
36.9 °C38.3 °C40.4 °C
Max: 41.3 °C
Medel: 38.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  38.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.236.22537.941.73132.328.54029.634.75033.243.26327.629.68019.419.710020.623.112517.726.11601635.120011.4422501248.531510.152.74008.455.15008.560.56309.762.980011.765100011.967.912501169.716001069.520009.670.4250010.370.5315010.870.1400011.667.5500012.36863001365.2800013.766.41000014.468.21250015.263.11600016.147.6SPL6659.923.880.2N19.212.50.546.3median 11.7median 65Delta1.91045.247.543.745.234.836.937.640.739.542.136.636.329.130.128.429.130.533.924.742.322.851.621.955.421.559.319.962.120.767.719.271.118.772.42275.518.274.317.873.317.770.217.87217.67617.877.417.772.218.167.518.359.218.767.91972.619.46466.13185.1191.662.4median 19median 67.928.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G9 PowerMotorola Moto G8 Power
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G9 Power audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.9 / 2.6 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.3 / 7.6 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G9 Power
6000 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M21
6000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M3
6000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
21%
-9%
23%
-9%
5%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.9
-13%
1.2
-50%
0.5
37%
0.809 (0.49 - 1.38, n=8)
-1%
0.934 (0.37 - 2.5, n=234, last 2 years)
-17%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.3
32%
1.8
5%
1.84
3%
2.58 (1.5 - 4.92, n=8)
-36%
1.843 (0.65 - 3.94, n=234, last 2 years)
3%
Idle Maximum *
2.6
1.6
38%
2.1
19%
1.87
28%
2.78 (1.63 - 4.95, n=8)
-7%
2.1 (0.69 - 4.2, n=234, last 2 years)
19%
Load Average *
5.3
3.2
40%
6.2
-17%
3.99
25%
5.33 (3.57 - 7.21, n=8)
-1%
4.46 (2.1 - 8.4, n=234, last 2 years)
16%
Load Maximum *
7.6
7.1
7%
7.9
-4%
6.01
21%
7.52 (5.2 - 9.32, n=8)
1%
7.24 (3.16 - 12.3, n=234, last 2 years)
5%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
42tim 20min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
19tim 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20tim 45min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 15min
Motorola Moto G9 Power
6000 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh
realme 7i
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M21
6000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M3
6000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-14%
12%
1%
9%
Reader / Idle
2540
2297
-10%
2756
9%
H.264
1245
1352
9%
1164
-7%
WiFi v1.3
1165
1002
-14%
1307
12%
1298
11%
1249
7%
Load
315
289
-8%
404
28%

För

+ Gediget positioneringssystem
+ Tar bra bilder av saker
+ Ganska exakt färgåtergivning
+ Lång batteritid
+ NFC
+ Skapligt ren Android

Emot

- Ganska mörk skärm
- Miljöfoton har medelmåttig skärpa
- Har ej 90 Hz bilduppdatering
- Ganska tung

Omdöme – En gedigen mittenskiktstelefon

Recension av Motorola Moto G9 Power.
Recension av Motorola Moto G9 Power.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Moto G9 Power är en framgångsrik uppdatering av den tidigare modellen och har snabbare WiFi, mer lagring och framför allt, bättre batteritid. Det är irriterande att prestandan har minskat en aning, men det går att acceptera med tanke på priset.

Positioneringssystemet gör sitt jobb väl och kameran tar fina foton av objekt men saknar skärpa på landskapsbilder. Skärmen kunde varit mer ljusstark och haft högre upplösning, men den återger åtminstone färger ganska bra. 

Motorola Moto G9 Power har lång batteritid och är utan större svagheter, men den lyckas heller inte riktigt stå ut från mängden.

Moto G9 Power har starka konkurrenter och det finns många andra telefoner i det här prisskiktet som kommer med batterier på 6.000 mAh. Moto G9 Power lyckas inte riktigt stå ut från mängden och det finns dessutom en del smartphones som har ännu längre batteritid. 

Men Moto G9 Power är ett gediget val för den som letar efter en stor telefon utan större svagheter som dessutom kommer med en ganska ren version av Android.

Motorola Moto G9 Power - 03/04/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design
82%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
93%
Anslutningar
45 / 70 → 64%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
85%
Spelprestanda
11 / 64 → 17%
Programprestanda
58 / 86 → 67%
Temperatur
87%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
64 / 90 → 71%
Camera
56%
Medel
71%
77%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Stephanie Chamberlain
Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 361 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020
contact me via: LinkedIn
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Motorola Moto G9 Power - Motorola-telefon med uthålligt batteri (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2021-03- 8 (Update: 2021-03- 8)