Notebookcheck

Test: Motorola Moto G9 Plus - Batterigigant som har problem med ljusstyrkan (Sammanfattning)

Hjälp ett knapptryck bort. Motorola släpper Moto G9 Plus, en ny mittenskiktstelefon med ett stort batteri på 5.000 mAh och en dedikerad knapp för Google-assistenten. Moto-telefonen har en Max Vision-skärm på 6.8 tum som dock inte bara var till dess fördel i vår recension - i synnerhet inte när det kommer till ljusstyrkan.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Jesper Berg),
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Moto G9 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 618
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.81 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 386 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, LTPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSDXC upp till 512 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, OTG, FM Radio
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 2/3/5/8; 3G: 1/2/4/5/8; 4G: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.7 x 170 x 78.1
Batteri
5000 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (ƒ/1,8) + 8 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,12 µm) + 2 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,75 µm) +2 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,75 µm)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/​2.0)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Mono, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare, USB C-kabel (USB C till USB C), Snabbstartsguide, SIM-verktyg, My UX, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR: 0,76 W/kg, Widevine L1, fanless
Vikt
223 g, Strömförsörjning: 79 g
Pris
286 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80 %
10/2020
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
SD 730G, Adreno 618
223 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.81"2400x1080
83 %
06/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
81 %
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy M51
SD 730, Adreno 618
213 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.70"2400x1080
80 %
06/2020
realme 6 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
195 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
79 %
01/2020
Oppo A91
Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.40"2400x1080
82 %
09/2020
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
SD 732G, Adreno 618
215 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
Recension av Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Recension av Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Recension av Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Recension av Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Recension av Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Recension av Motorola Moto G9 Plus

Storleksjämförelse

170 mm 78.1 mm 9.7 mm 223 g165.3 mm 76.8 mm 9.4 mm 215 g165.75 mm 76.68 mm 8.8 mm 209 g163.9 mm 76.3 mm 9.5 mm 213 g163.8 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 195 g160.2 mm 73.3 mm 7.9 mm 172 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
636 (500min - 675max) MBit/s ∼100% +106%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (283min - 670max) MBit/s ∼97% +100%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
337 (270min - 351max) MBit/s ∼53% +9%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
309 (140min - 360max) MBit/s ∼49%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
294 (80min - 338max) MBit/s ∼46% -5%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 (145min - 352max) MBit/s ∼46% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=613)
285 MBit/s ∼45% -8%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
633 (589min - 676max) MBit/s ∼100% +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼87% +69%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
332 (312min - 337max) MBit/s ∼52% +2%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
326 (309min - 343max) MBit/s ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 (318min - 330max) MBit/s ∼51% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 (137min - 336max) MBit/s ∼46% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=613)
272 MBit/s ∼43% -17%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø309 (140-360)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø326 (309-343)
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Motorola Moto G9 Plus
GPS Motorola Moto G9 Plus
GPS Motorola Moto G9 Plus
GPS Motorola Moto G9 Plus
GPS Motorola Moto G9 Plus
GPS Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Ultra-vidvinkel
Ultra-vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
8x zoom (max)
8x zoom (max)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide angle
ColorChecker
29.8 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
34 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
63.5 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
72.2 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
76.2 ∆E
68.2 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
24 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G9 Plus: 45.25 ∆E min: 14.11 - max: 76.18 ∆E
ColorChecker
20.2 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
10 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G9 Plus: 12.52 ∆E min: 1.73 - max: 20.18 ∆E
362
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
373
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 390 cd/m² Medel: 377.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.6 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 390 cd/m²
Kontrast: 591:1 (Svärta: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.39 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6
95.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.506
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
LTPS, 2400x1080, 6.81
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy M51
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
realme 6 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.60
Oppo A91
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
58%
19%
-5%
-23%
39%
Brightness middle
390
610
56%
626
61%
442
13%
594
52%
623
60%
Brightness
377
579
54%
632
68%
419
11%
613
63%
600
59%
Brightness Distribution
93
92
-1%
94
1%
90
-3%
89
-4%
93
0%
Black Level *
0.66
0.37
44%
0.37
44%
0.54
18%
Contrast
591
1649
179%
1195
102%
1154
95%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.39
1.8
47%
2.88
15%
6.1
-80%
6.1
-80%
1.8
47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.22
3
43%
4.97
5%
9.7
-86%
10.6
-103%
4.7
10%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.3
2.5
42%
5.9
-37%
5.9
-37%
7
-63%
3.3
23%
Gamma
2.506 88%
2.31 95%
3.441 64%
2.35 94%
2.28 96%
2.26 97%
CCT
6033 108%
6864 95%
6415 101%
7631 85%
7370 88%
6712 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9604 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1113 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1149 Points ∼56% +3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1291 Points ∼63% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
1113 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (259 - 5532, n=45)
2047 Points ∼100% +84%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
987 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1007 Points ∼58% +2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points ∼63% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (987 - 1030, n=2)
1009 Points ∼58% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 4789, n=50)
1744 Points ∼100% +77%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1786 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1771 Points ∼90% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1780 Points ∼91% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1759 Points ∼90% -2%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1475 Points ∼75% -17%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1430 Points ∼73% -20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1787 Points ∼91% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1646 - 1786, n=5)
1722 Points ∼88% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 4160, n=141)
1964 Points ∼100% +10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
551 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
569 Points ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
548 Points ∼96% -1%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
567 Points ∼100% +3%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
320 Points ∼56% -42%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
282 Points ∼50% -49%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
567 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (543 - 551, n=5)
547 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1604, n=141)
567 Points ∼100% +3%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
8411 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8962 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
8411 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=361)
4905 Points ∼55% -42%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6987 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7130 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
6987 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=425)
5018 Points ∼70% -28%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2556 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2638 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
2556 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4965, n=425)
1533 Points ∼58% -40%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
7737 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7829 Points ∼77% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7913 Points ∼78% +2%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
10106 Points ∼100% +31%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8185 Points ∼81% +6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8101 Points ∼80% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (7134 - 8683, n=6)
7715 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=541)
6024 Points ∼60% -22%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
9956 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9091 Points ∼66% -9%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9075 Points ∼66% -9%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
13777 Points ∼100% +38%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8773 Points ∼64% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (8941 - 10200, n=6)
9422 Points ∼68% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=698)
6624 Points ∼48% -33%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2775 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2721 Points ∼95% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2862 Points ∼100% +3%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2562 Points ∼90% -8%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2304 Points ∼81% -17%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2827 Points ∼99% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2621 - 2775, n=6)
2720 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=193)
2662 Points ∼93% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2199 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2250 Points ∼73% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2180 Points ∼71% -1%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2255 Points ∼73% +3%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1103 Points ∼36% -50%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2427 Points ∼79% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2143 - 2199, n=6)
2158 Points ∼70% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=193)
3069 Points ∼100% +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2310 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2340 Points ∼86% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2302 Points ∼85% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2317 Points ∼85% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1248 Points ∼46% -46%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2506 Points ∼92% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2244 - 2310, n=6)
2262 Points ∼83% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=193)
2721 Points ∼100% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3391 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3236 Points ∼94% -5%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3349 Points ∼97% -1%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3067 Points ∼89% -10%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2621 Points ∼76% -23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3438 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3058 - 3391, n=6)
3218 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=547)
2256 Points ∼66% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2471 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2539 Points ∼93% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2465 Points ∼90% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2558 Points ∼94% +4%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1102 Points ∼40% -55%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2735 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2425 - 2492, n=6)
2459 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=547)
2234 Points ∼82% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2701 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2667 Points ∼93% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2619 Points ∼91% -3%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2656 Points ∼93% -2%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1265 Points ∼44% -53%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2865 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2561 - 2701, n=6)
2598 Points ∼91% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=548)
2070 Points ∼72% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3352 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3226 Points ∼94% -4%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3339 Points ∼97% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3125 Points ∼91% -7%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2606 Points ∼76% -22%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3112 - 3352, n=6)
3213 Points ∼94% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=579)
2173 Points ∼63% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3773 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3785 Points ∼93% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3741 Points ∼92% -1%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3835 Points ∼94% +2%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1747 Points ∼43% -54%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4086 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3646 - 3773, n=6)
3703 Points ∼91% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 21465, n=579)
3035 Points ∼74% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3704 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3645 Points ∼93% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3644 Points ∼93% -2%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3651 Points ∼93% -1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1885 Points ∼48% -49%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3918 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3513 - 3704, n=6)
3586 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=579)
2515 Points ∼64% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3328 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3170 Points ∼92% -5%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3331 Points ∼97% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3083 Points ∼90% -7%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2550 Points ∼74% -23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3436 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3088 - 3328, n=6)
3216 Points ∼94% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5262, n=628)
2133 Points ∼62% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2293 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2356 Points ∼92% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2299 Points ∼90% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼93% +4%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1117 Points ∼44% -51%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2559 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2237 - 2310, n=6)
2271 Points ∼89% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=628)
1878 Points ∼73% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2489 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2499 Points ∼92% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2469 Points ∼91% -1%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2514 Points ∼93% +1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1276 Points ∼47% -49%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2713 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2388 - 2489, n=6)
2434 Points ∼90% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=629)
1779 Points ∼66% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3349 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3263 Points ∼96% -3%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3362 Points ∼99% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3076 Points ∼91% -8%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2568 Points ∼76% -23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3382 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3075 - 3349, n=6)
3235 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=670)
2004 Points ∼59% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3678 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3620 Points ∼92% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3604 Points ∼92% -2%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3683 Points ∼94% 0%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1767 Points ∼45% -52%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3917 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3485 - 3678, n=6)
3567 Points ∼91% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=669)
2485 Points ∼63% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3556 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3534 Points ∼93% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3547 Points ∼94% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3528 Points ∼93% -1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1899 Points ∼50% -47%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3784 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3399 - 3594, n=6)
3490 Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=672)
2123 Points ∼56% -40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
20382 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20054 Points ∼82% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
21603 Points ∼88% +6%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
14849 Points ∼61% -27%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
24514 Points ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20797 Points ∼85% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (14820 - 22054, n=5)
18710 Points ∼76% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=814)
15761 Points ∼64% -23%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
53182 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
51789 Points ∼91% -3%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
52736 Points ∼93% -1%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
53600 Points ∼95% +1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23159 Points ∼41% -56%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
56640 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (50829 - 53548, n=5)
52404 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 221179, n=812)
28064 Points ∼50% -47%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
39572 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38315 Points ∼94% -3%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
39944 Points ∼98% +1%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
33926 Points ∼83% -14%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23447 Points ∼57% -41%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
40955 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (33007 - 39608, n=5)
37271 Points ∼91% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=812)
21675 Points ∼53% -45%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
86 fps ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
85 fps ∼93% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
67 fps ∼74% -22%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼93% -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
91 fps ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (83 - 86, n=5)
84.4 fps ∼93% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=812)
47.1 fps ∼52% -45%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
57 fps ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
55 fps ∼92% -4%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (57 - 60, n=5)
59.2 fps ∼99% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=821)
31.8 fps ∼53% -44%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
42 fps ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼91% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼76% -19%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
41 fps ∼91% -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
45 fps ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (41 - 42, n=5)
41.4 fps ∼92% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=717)
28 fps ∼62% -33%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
38 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
31 fps ∼79% -18%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
38 fps ∼97% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼87% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (36 - 39, n=5)
37.8 fps ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=725)
23.1 fps ∼59% -39%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
30 fps ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼91% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼73% -20%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼91% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (30 - 30, n=5)
30 fps ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=580)
22.4 fps ∼68% -25%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
27 fps ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
22 fps ∼76% -19%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
27 fps ∼93% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28 fps ∼97% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (26 - 29, n=5)
27.4 fps ∼94% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=582)
20.1 fps ∼69% -26%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
10 fps ∼86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼95% +10%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
8.3 fps ∼72% -17%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼95% +10%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
4.5 fps ∼39% -55%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼95% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (10 - 11, n=6)
10.3 fps ∼89% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=339)
11.6 fps ∼100% +16%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6.3 fps ∼77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.9 fps ∼84% +10%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
5.4 fps ∼66% -14%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7 fps ∼85% +11%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2.9 fps ∼35% -54%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7.5 fps ∼91% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6.3 - 10, n=6)
7.17 fps ∼87% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=337)
8.2 fps ∼100% +30%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
16 fps ∼89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼94% +6%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼72% -19%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼94% +6%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
7.5 fps ∼42% -53%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (16 - 17, n=6)
16.3 fps ∼91% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=343)
17.3 fps ∼96% +8%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
18 fps ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼90% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼75% -17%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼95% +6%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8.8 fps ∼44% -51%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20 fps ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (18 - 18, n=6)
18 fps ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=342)
19.9 fps ∼100% +11%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
17 fps ∼89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼95% +6%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
14 fps ∼74% -18%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼95% +6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
19 fps ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (17 - 17, n=5)
17 fps ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=505)
15 fps ∼79% -12%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
16 fps ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
12 fps ∼71% -25%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼94% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (15 - 17, n=5)
15.8 fps ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=509)
13.3 fps ∼78% -17%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
251673 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
271934 Points ∼84% +8%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
247877 Points ∼77% -2%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
275464 Points ∼85% +9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
279048 Points ∼86% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (251673 - 273255, n=5)
264147 Points ∼82% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=135)
323501 Points ∼100% +29%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1347 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1226 Points ∼88% -9%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1366 Points ∼98% +1%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1233 Points ∼88% -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1395 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1190 - 1365, n=5)
1284 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=749)
833 Points ∼60% -38%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3984 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3757 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3875 Points ∼97% -3%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3768 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3960 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3840 - 3984, n=5)
3885 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=749)
2580 Points ∼65% -35%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
4029 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4452 Points ∼97% +10%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4482 Points ∼98% +11%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4573 Points ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4041 Points ∼88% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3678 - 4544, n=5)
4057 Points ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=749)
1932 Points ∼42% -52%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6612 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6856 Points ∼99% +4%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6606 Points ∼96% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
6908 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
6542 Points ∼95% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6305 - 6796, n=5)
6582 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=749)
3535 Points ∼51% -47%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3412 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3444 Points ∼97% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3539 Points ∼100% +4%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3481 Points ∼98% +2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3477 Points ∼98% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3268 - 3512, n=5)
3385 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=749)
1813 Points ∼51% -47%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
52.591 Points ∼100% +4%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
50.582 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
50.111 Points ∼95% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
47.901 Points ∼91% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 50.6, n=5)
47.3 Points ∼90% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=208)
42.1 Points ∼80% -17%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
90.555 Points ∼100% +5%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
89.577 Points ∼99% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
86.75 Points ∼96% 0%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
86.541 Points ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=5)
84 Points ∼93% -3%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
66.339 Points ∼73% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 343, n=641)
49 Points ∼54% -43%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
45.2 runs/min ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=189)
44.4 runs/min ∼98% +3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
43.9 runs/min ∼97% +1%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
43.3 runs/min ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=5)
43 runs/min ∼95% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chome 85)
41.3 runs/min ∼91% -5%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
72 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
71 Points ∼99% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=278)
70.8 Points ∼98% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=5)
70.4 Points ∼98% +4%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
69 Points ∼96% +1%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
68 Points ∼94%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
67 Points ∼93% -1%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
17398 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
17265 Points ∼99% +3%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
17157 Points ∼99% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=5)
16856 Points ∼97% +1%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
16729 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
16399 Points ∼94% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58488, n=810)
8190 Points ∼47% -51%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=836)
9605 ms * ∼100% -245%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
3033.1 ms * ∼32% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=5)
2900 ms * ∼30% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
2850.1 ms * ∼30% -2%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
2783.1 ms * ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
2773.8 ms * ∼29% -0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
2672.8 ms * ∼28% +4%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G9 PlusXiaomi Redmi Note 9 ProSamsung Galaxy M51realme 6 ProOppo A91Xiaomi Poco X3 NFCAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-4%
-2%
15%
-13%
-4%
15%
-35%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
54.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-16%
59.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
63.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
60.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-8%
55.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-15%
59.4 (8.4 - 72.4, n=37)
-9%
51.4 (1.7 - 87.1, n=546)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
74.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
77.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
75.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
75 (13.4 - 88.3, n=37)
-12%
69.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=546)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
98.12
112.93
15%
114.5
17%
154
57%
28.55
-71%
112.55
15%
114 (18.2 - 290, n=67)
16%
38.1 (0.14 - 319, n=907)
-61%
Random Read 4KB
134.77
122.58
-9%
123.6
-8%
158.66
18%
145.64
8%
123.43
-8%
145 (96.8 - 239, n=67)
8%
61.3 (1.59 - 325, n=907)
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB
186.23
171.09
-8%
189.8
2%
203.28
9%
185.26
-1%
173.09
-7%
243 (182 - 511, n=67)
30%
134 (2.99 - 1321, n=907)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB
489.37
498.15
2%
491.7
0%
512.61
5%
505.44
3%
505.96
3%
765 (427 - 999, n=67)
56%
353 (12.1 - 2037, n=907)
-28%
PUBG mobile
01020304050Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø39.9 (38-41)
; Balanced: Ø39.9 (38-41)
; HD: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Asphalt 9 Legends
010203040Tooltip
: Ø29.4 (20-31)
Hög belastning
 42.2 °C39.6 °C37.6 °C 
 41.7 °C39.4 °C37.9 °C 
 41.4 °C39.4 °C37.5 °C 
Max: 42.2 °C
Medel: 39.6 °C
34.9 °C37.8 °C39.4 °C
34.8 °C38.3 °C41.4 °C
36.6 °C38.9 °C39.4 °C
Max: 41.4 °C
Medel: 37.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  39.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.439.72541.942.63138.531.44042.2335043.734.46337.430.78029.622.910026.626.412532.431.916027.540.320019.347.225019.353.631519.357.440019.460.950020.265.563022.965.380022.164.4100022.368.3125023.168.5160020.972.8200020.872.9250021.869.8315022.967.4400023.764.650002571.3630025.275.7800026.271.81000028661250027.8671600028.353.1SPL66.273.975.735.982.4N19.62936.42.453.1median 22.9median 65.5Delta3.17.530.530.121.326.518.425.822.52420.328.115.828.315.728.616.728.315.133.11550.410.651.114.155.410.862.310.962.410.567.28.8691071.110.173.111.176.111.979.61180.512.180.812.57812.778.313.478.913.874.21571.11467.814.162.814.162.424.489.20.574.8median 12.5median 69210.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G9 PlusXiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.7 / 2.2 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.3 / 7.4 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M51
7000 mAh
realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh
Oppo A91
4025 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
5160 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
4%
11%
-2%
18%
-15%
16%
6%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.75
6%
0.8
-0%
0.92
-15%
0.82
-3%
0.93
-16%
0.698 (0.49 - 0.8, n=5)
13%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=907)
-11%
Idle Average *
1.7
2.19
-29%
1.3
24%
1.79
-5%
1.73
-2%
2.47
-45%
1.362 (0.96 - 1.8, n=5)
20%
1.756 (0.6 - 6.2, n=906)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
2.24
-2%
1.8
18%
1.88
15%
1.75
20%
2.51
-14%
1.712 (1 - 2.2, n=5)
22%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=907)
7%
Load Average *
5.3
3.88
27%
4.8
9%
5.41
-2%
2.33
56%
5.62
-6%
4.54 (3.11 - 5.38, n=5)
14%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=901)
22%
Load Maximum *
7.4
5.97
19%
7
5%
7.59
-3%
5.97
19%
6.93
6%
6.59 (5.23 - 7.5, n=5)
11%
6.12 (1.2 - 14.2, n=901)
17%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
45tim 32min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16tim 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22tim 32min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 27min
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M51
7000 mAh
realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh
Oppo A91
4025 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
5160 mAh
Battery Runtime
0%
29%
7%
-37%
-1%
Reader / Idle
2732
2336
-14%
2642
-3%
2427
-11%
H.264
1352
1096
-19%
1685
25%
1188
-12%
WiFi v1.3
968
1175
21%
1508
56%
1031
7%
605
-37%
1116
15%
Load
267
303
13%
365
37%
280
5%

För

+ Lång batteritid
+ Snabb laddning
+ Hög prestanda

Emot

- Haptiken
- Mörk LC-panel med låg kontrast
- Kamerorna

Omdöme: Moto G9 Plus - Motorolas mobil saknar det lilla extra

Recension av Motorola Moto G9 Plus. Recensionsex från Motorola Germany
Recension av Motorola Moto G9 Plus. Recensionsex från Motorola Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

G9 Plus lämnade ett blandat intryck i vår recension. Å ena sidan har Motorolas mittenskiktsmodell riktigt bra ljudkvalitet, snabba laddningstider och lämplig prestanda för sin prisklass. Konstruktionskvaliteten är också ett plus.    

Moto G9 Plus är en rejäl mittenskiktstelefon - varken mer eller mindre.

Däremot var Moto G en besvikelse på ett väldigt viktigt område: skärmen. Kameran övertygade inte riktigt heller. LTPS-panelen har bara stöd för 60 Hz och är inte särskilt ljusstark, vilket i kombination med höga nivåer av svärta resulterar i en kontrastnivå under genomsnittet. Dessutom lider den av typiska LCD-fenomen som glorior och ojämn ljusstyrkefördelning runt skärmens kanter.

Även om Moto G9 Plus bara kostar runt 2.890 kronor finns det också LC-skärmar med snabb bilduppdatering (exempelvis Poco X3 NFC) och OLED-paneler (exempelvis Samsung Galaxy M51) i mittensegmentet.

Motorola Moto G9 Plus - 10/13/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Design
79%
Tangentbord
68 / 75 → 91%
Mus
89%
Anslutningar
47 / 70 → 68%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
84%
Spelprestanda
29 / 64 → 45%
Programprestanda
67 / 86 → 78%
Temperatur
88%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
60%
Medel
75%
80%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Motorola Moto G9 Plus - Batterigigant som har problem med ljusstyrkan (Sammanfattning)
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-10-21 (Update: 2020-10-21)