Notebookcheck

Test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Massor av batteritid och bra kameror (Sammanfattning)

Evighetslång batteritid. Med Moto G8 Power har Motorola förfinat konceptet med en billig smartphone som har lång batteritid. Hårdvaran är inte bara lämplig för vardagsbruk utan telefonen har också förvånansvärt bra kameror. Läs vidare för att få reda på vad Moto G8 Power har att erbjuda utöver batteritid och skapliga kameror.
Mike Wobker, Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Moto G8 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.4 tum 19:9, 2300 x 1080 pixlar 397 PPI, Kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, USB Typ C, Kortläsare: microSD (upp till 512 GB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5, 2G GSM (2/3/5/8), 3G, Dual SIM, LTE
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 10 x 156 x 76
Batteri
5000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix 16 MP (ƒ/1.7, 1.12 µm) + 2 MP (ƒ/2.2, 1.75 µm) makro + 8 MP (ƒ/2.2, 1.12 µm) ultravidvinkel, 8 MP (ƒ/2.2, 1.12 µm) teleobjektiv med 2x optisk zoom
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix , ƒ/2.0, 1 µm
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2 högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, USB-nätadapter, USB Typ C-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Skyddsfodral, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värde (Huvud): 0.914 W/kg, SAR-värde (Kropp): 1.79 W/kg, LTE-hastigheter: 400 MBit/s (nerladdning), 75 MBit/s (uppladdning)
Vikt
197 g, Strömförsörjning: 80 g
Pris
230 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Jämförelseenheter

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78 %
03/2020
Motorola Moto G8 Power
SD 665, Adreno 610
197 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.4"2300x1080
81 %
12/2019
Sharp Aquos V
SD 835, Adreno 540
173 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash5.9"2160x1080
78 %
10/2019
Nokia 6.2
SD 636, Adreno 509
180 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
78 %
10/2019
Xiaomi Mi A3
SD 665, Adreno 610
173.8 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.09"1560x720
80 %
01/2020
TCL Plex
SD 675, Adreno 612
192 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.53"2340x1080
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Motorola Moto G8 Power

Storleksjämförelse

162.2 mm 76.56 mm 7.99 mm 192 g159.9 mm 75.15 mm 8.25 mm 180 g156 mm 76 mm 10 mm 197 g157 mm 76 mm 9 mm 173 g153.5 mm 71.9 mm 8.5 mm 173.8 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sharp Aquos V
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
468 (406min - 517max) MBit/s ∼100% +728%
TCL Plex
Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
359 (330min - 369max) MBit/s ∼77% +535%
Nokia 6.2
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
325 (280min - 342max) MBit/s ∼69% +475%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=590)
277 MBit/s ∼59% +390%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
158 (18min - 227max) MBit/s ∼34% +180%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56.5 (11min - 75max) MBit/s ∼12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sharp Aquos V
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
409 (342min - 464max) MBit/s ∼100% +811%
TCL Plex
Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
287 (250min - 308max) MBit/s ∼70% +539%
Nokia 6.2
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
284 (240min - 307max) MBit/s ∼69% +533%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=590)
263 MBit/s ∼64% +486%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
172 (2min - 282max) MBit/s ∼42% +283%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.9 (2min - 75max) MBit/s ∼11%
01020304050607080Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø56.4 (11-75)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø44.8 (2-75)
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Översikt
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Översikt
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Bro
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Bro
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Korsning
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Korsning
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bro
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bro
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Korsning
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Korsning

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
27.2 ∆E
47.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
56.4 ∆E
55.3 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
63 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
55.9 ∆E
59.9 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G8 Power: 40.39 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 63.03 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G8 Power: 7.58 ∆E min: 1.73 - max: 12.84 ∆E
Foto av vår testkarta
Foto av vår testkarta
Testkartan vid 1 lux
490
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 495 cd/m² Medel: 483.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.5 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 462 cd/m²
Kontrast: 711:1 (Svärta: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6
92.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.303
Motorola Moto G8 Power
IPS, 2300x1080, 6.4
Sharp Aquos V
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Nokia 6.2
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Xiaomi Mi A3
AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09
TCL Plex
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Screen
15%
25%
-15%
21%
Brightness middle
462
507
10%
611
32%
348
-25%
432
-6%
Brightness
483
486
1%
582
20%
355
-27%
418
-13%
Brightness Distribution
93
91
-2%
91
-2%
91
-2%
93
0%
Black Level *
0.65
0.55
15%
0.4
38%
0.43
34%
Contrast
711
922
30%
1528
115%
1005
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.7
4.43
22%
5.2
9%
5.86
-3%
3.4
40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.9
7.13
20%
10.2
-15%
15.6
-75%
6
33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.5
5
23%
6.1
6%
3.6
45%
3.8
42%
Gamma
2.303 96%
2.18 101%
2.21 100%
2.232 99%
2.14 103%
CCT
8073 81%
7739 84%
8100 80%
7051 92%
6151 106%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 714.3 Hz
≤ 15 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 714.3 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 714.3 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17588 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
464 Points ∼28%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
369 Points ∼23% -20%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
487 Points ∼30% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (432 - 483, n=5)
455 Points ∼28% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼100% +252%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
368 Points ∼19%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
1908 Points ∼100% +418%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
351 Points ∼18% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (363 - 368, n=5)
366 Points ∼19% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼92% +378%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1385 Points ∼72%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
1669 Points ∼86% +21%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
924 Points ∼48% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1256 - 1405, n=7)
1346 Points ∼70% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=113)
1930 Points ∼100% +39%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
311 Points ∼57%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
386 Points ∼70% +24%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
486 Points ∼89% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (309 - 313, n=7)
311 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=113)
549 Points ∼100% +77%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6963 Points ∼88%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
7510 Points ∼94% +8%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5965 Points ∼75% -14%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6396 Points ∼80% -8%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7950 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6189 - 11432, n=11)
7048 Points ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=516)
5927 Points ∼75% -15%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8804 Points ∼89%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
9927 Points ∼100% +13%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6696 Points ∼67% -24%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7984 Points ∼80% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7437 - 9051, n=10)
8163 Points ∼82% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=674)
6499 Points ∼65% -26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2354 Points ∼89%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2559 Points ∼96% +9%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2175 Points ∼82% -8%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2300 Points ∼87% -2%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1952 Points ∼73% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2185 - 2444, n=11)
2284 Points ∼86% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=168)
2656 Points ∼100% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
904 Points ∼25%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3580 Points ∼100% +296%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
789 Points ∼22% -13%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
908 Points ∼25% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
916 Points ∼26% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (897 - 995, n=11)
933 Points ∼26% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=168)
2963 Points ∼83% +228%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1047 Points ∼32%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3288 Points ∼100% +214%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
926 Points ∼28% -12%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1049 Points ∼32% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1038 Points ∼32% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1035 - 1140, n=11)
1074 Points ∼33% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6754, n=168)
2668 Points ∼81% +155%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2488 Points ∼81%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3062 Points ∼100% +23%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2337 Points ∼76% -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2387 Points ∼78% -4%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1684 Points ∼55% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2154 - 2541, n=10)
2378 Points ∼78% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=519)
2205 Points ∼72% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
988 Points ∼22%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4468 Points ∼100% +352%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
855 Points ∼19% -13%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
987 Points ∼22% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
955 Points ∼21% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 - 999, n=10)
988 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=519)
2112 Points ∼47% +114%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1151 Points ∼28%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4054 Points ∼100% +252%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
977 Points ∼24% -15%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1135 Points ∼28% -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1057 Points ∼26% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1097 - 1151, n=10)
1135 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8269, n=520)
1974 Points ∼49% +72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points ∼82%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3047 Points ∼100% +22%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2288 Points ∼75% -8%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2343 Points ∼77% -6%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1657 Points ∼54% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2199 - 2503, n=11)
2365 Points ∼78% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=550)
2116 Points ∼69% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1678 Points ∼26%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
6417 Points ∼100% +282%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1389 Points ∼22% -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1674 Points ∼26% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1611 Points ∼25% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1650 - 1692, n=11)
1668 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=550)
2833 Points ∼44% +69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1809 Points ∼35%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5151 Points ∼100% +185%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1568 Points ∼30% -13%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points ∼35% -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1621 Points ∼31% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1754 - 1810, n=11)
1786 Points ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=550)
2382 Points ∼46% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points ∼83%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3018 Points ∼100% +21%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2335 Points ∼77% -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2477 Points ∼82% -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1724 Points ∼57% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2212 - 2580, n=11)
2417 Points ∼80% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=600)
2088 Points ∼69% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
984 Points ∼24%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4031 Points ∼100% +310%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
809 Points ∼20% -18%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
931 Points ∼23% -5%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
829 Points ∼21% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (927 - 999, n=11)
968 Points ∼24% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=600)
1781 Points ∼44% +81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1137 Points ∼30%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3751 Points ∼100% +230%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
945 Points ∼25% -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1081 Points ∼29% -5%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
937 Points ∼25% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1076 - 1152, n=11)
1118 Points ∼30% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7400, n=601)
1699 Points ∼45% +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2507 Points ∼83%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3009 Points ∼100% +20%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2339 Points ∼78% -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2471 Points ∼82% -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1708 Points ∼57% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2282 - 2596, n=11)
2429 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=642)
1954 Points ∼65% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1626 Points ∼26%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
6208 Points ∼100% +282%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1322 Points ∼21% -19%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1651 Points ∼27% +2%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1594 Points ∼26% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1564 - 1663, n=11)
1622 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12611, n=641)
2347 Points ∼38% +44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1764 Points ∼35%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5022 Points ∼100% +185%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1467 Points ∼29% -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points ∼35% +1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1618 Points ∼32% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1675 - 1795, n=11)
1750 Points ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=644)
2019 Points ∼40% +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24652 Points ∼100%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15876 Points ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19552 Points ∼79% -21%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
15461 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (17865 - 24652, n=10)
20916 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=787)
15436 Points ∼63% -37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25161 Points ∼94%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
21067 Points ∼79% -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25219 Points ∼95% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
26320 Points ∼99% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15403 - 25351, n=10)
23960 Points ∼90% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=785)
26683 Points ∼100% +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25046 Points ∼100%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19635 Points ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23693 Points ∼95% -5%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
22767 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (22445 - 25046, n=10)
23870 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=785)
20833 Points ∼83% -17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼80%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼78% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼80% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (35 - 36, n=9)
35.8 fps ∼79% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=789)
45.1 fps ∼100% +25%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
33 fps ∼63%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
32 fps ∼62% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
52 fps ∼100% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (30 - 52, n=9)
35.8 fps ∼69% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=798)
31.1 fps ∼60% -6%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼71%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼60% -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼75% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (19 - 20, n=9)
19.2 fps ∼72% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=694)
26.6 fps ∼100% +40%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18 fps ∼53%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼44% -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼100% +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15 - 34, n=9)
21.1 fps ∼62% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=702)
22.4 fps ∼66% +24%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼61%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼29% -52%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼61% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (13 - 13, n=9)
13 fps ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=557)
21.4 fps ∼100% +65%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼46%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.7 fps ∼22% -52%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
26 fps ∼100% +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (10 - 27, n=9)
15 fps ∼58% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=559)
19.4 fps ∼75% +62%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps ∼30%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
15 fps ∼100% +233%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps ∼15% -49%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps ∼61% +102%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
4.9 fps ∼33% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (3.9 - 9.1, n=11)
5.65 fps ∼38% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=312)
11.2 fps ∼75% +149%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼29%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
9.7 fps ∼100% +246%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
3.5 fps ∼36% +25%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼29% 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
3 fps ∼31% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.7 - 2.8, n=11)
2.77 fps ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=310)
8.02 fps ∼83% +186%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps ∼32%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
24 fps ∼100% +216%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼23% -29%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼63% +97%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8.3 fps ∼35% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.2 - 15, n=11)
9.31 fps ∼39% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=316)
16.8 fps ∼70% +121%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼31%
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
26 fps ∼100% +221%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼23% -26%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.4 fps ∼32% +4%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
9.1 fps ∼35% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.8 - 8.4, n=11)
8.13 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=315)
19.3 fps ∼74% +138%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼49%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼44% -11%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼49% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.9 - 7.2, n=9)
7.06 fps ∼49% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=482)
14.4 fps ∼100% +103%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.6 fps ∼51%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼42% -18%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼100% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5.7 - 13, n=9)
7.86 fps ∼60% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=486)
12.7 fps ∼98% +92%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
168901 Points ∼53%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
145220 Points ∼46% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (167305 - 181432, n=9)
171951 Points ∼54% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=111)
317377 Points ∼100% +88%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
935 Points ∼67%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
876 Points ∼63% -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1400 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (926 - 1400, n=9)
1101 Points ∼79% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=728)
820 Points ∼59% -12%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1931 Points ∼77%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1632 Points ∼65% -15%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1886 Points ∼75% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1881 - 1932, n=9)
1906 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=728)
2499 Points ∼100% +29%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2864 Points ∼90%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2024 Points ∼64% -29%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
3174 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1804 - 3174, n=9)
2681 Points ∼84% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=728)
1862 Points ∼59% -35%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4848 Points ∼95%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4498 Points ∼88% -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5089 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (4391 - 5089, n=9)
4825 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=728)
3458 Points ∼68% -29%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2238 Points ∼88%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1907 Points ∼75% -15%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2556 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2001 - 2556, n=9)
2271 Points ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=728)
1763 Points ∼69% -21%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
51.046 Points ∼100% +6%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
48.109 Points ∼94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8)
47.5 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=619)
47.1 Points ∼92% -2%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
44.435 Points ∼87% -8%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=255)
69.7 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
58 Points ∼83% +4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
56 Points ∼80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9)
50.9 Points ∼73% -9%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
46 Points ∼66% -18%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
9260 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9)
8901 Points ∼96% +3%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
8756 Points ∼95% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
8675 Points ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=786)
7859 Points ∼85% -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=812)
9766 ms * ∼100% -109%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
5065.7 ms * ∼52% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9)
4783 ms * ∼49% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
4663.6 ms * ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
4583.8 ms * ∼47% +2%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G8 PowerSharp Aquos VNokia 6.2Xiaomi Mi A3TCL PlexAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
40%
-4%
29%
38%
-11%
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
49.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
54.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
61.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
24%
50.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
56.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
57.8 (11.2 - 74.7, n=127)
16%
51.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=530)
3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
69.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
83.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
20%
67.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
74.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
76.9 (21.1 - 87.2, n=127)
11%
69.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=530)
0%
Random Write 4KB
132.63
16.8
-87%
14.88
-89%
117.4
-11%
130.11
-2%
27.5 (3.4 - 147, n=145)
-79%
35.8 (0.14 - 319, n=883)
-73%
Random Read 4KB
57.7
157.2
172%
78.83
37%
126.9
120%
130.75
127%
56.2 (11.4 - 149, n=145)
-3%
59.1 (1.59 - 324, n=883)
2%
Sequential Write 256KB
181.88
206.2
13%
158.54
-13%
184
1%
199.74
10%
175 (40 - 254, n=145)
-4%
127 (2.99 - 911, n=883)
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB
300.9
650.9
116%
296.76
-1%
502.2
67%
522.31
74%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=145)
-9%
341 (12.1 - 1802, n=883)
13%
Hög belastning
 41.3 °C38.3 °C37.4 °C 
 41.5 °C38.3 °C37.6 °C 
 40 °C37.8 °C37.4 °C 
Max: 41.5 °C
Medel: 38.8 °C
36.5 °C38.2 °C41.6 °C
36.2 °C38.4 °C41.1 °C
36 °C38.2 °C40.2 °C
Max: 41.6 °C
Medel: 38.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  37.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated); Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.247.52543.745.23134.836.94037.640.75039.542.16336.636.38029.130.110028.429.112530.533.916024.742.320022.851.625021.955.431521.559.340019.962.150020.767.763019.271.180018.772.410002275.5125018.274.3160017.873.3200017.770.2250017.872315017.676400017.877.4500017.772.2630018.167.5800018.359.21000018.767.9125001972.61600019.464SPL66.13185.1N191.662.4median 19median 67.9Delta28.429.832.825.224.321.623.124.722.629.631.822.519.825.120.620.120.619.92220.830.217.631.817.638.917.445.216.151.813.957.714.559.616.167.314.572.414.470.613.668.613.972.814.576.114.475.214.871.414.77514.869.214.963.315.1611550.615.144.326.983.90.952.3median 14.9median 611.514.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G8 PowerNokia 6.2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Nokia 6.2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.4 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.2 / 7.1 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh
Nokia 6.2
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
TCL Plex
3820 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-22%
-37%
-21%
-27%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.72
20%
0.8
11%
0.73
19%
1.036 (0.62 - 1.7, n=10)
-15%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=885)
1%
Idle Average *
1.3
2.22
-71%
2
-54%
2.17
-67%
1.942 (1.3 - 2.3, n=10)
-49%
1.755 (0.6 - 6.2, n=884)
-35%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
2.23
-39%
3.3
-106%
2.23
-39%
2.43 (1.6 - 3.5, n=10)
-52%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=885)
-28%
Load Average *
3.2
3.98
-24%
4.1
-28%
4.56
-43%
3.88 (3.2 - 4.7, n=10)
-21%
4.1 (0.8 - 10.8, n=879)
-28%
Load Maximum *
7.1
6.86
3%
7.7
-8%
5.22
26%
6.82 (6.09 - 7.7, n=10)
4%
6.08 (1.2 - 14.2, n=879)
14%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16tim 42min
Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh
Sharp Aquos V
3160 mAh
Nokia 6.2
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
TCL Plex
3820 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
1002
718
-28%
611
-39%
985
-2%
616
-39%

För

+ Lång batteritid
+ Bra kameror
+ Robust design
+ Nästan ren Android

Emot

- Långsamt WiFi
- Skärm med låg kontrast

Omdöme - Prisvärd

Recension av Motorola Moto G8 Power. Recensionsex från Motorola Germany.
Recension av Motorola Moto G8 Power. Recensionsex från Motorola Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Med Moto G8 Power kan man förvänta sig en smartphone som över allt annat har utmärkt batteritid. På den punkten går den inte att kritisera och den höll i en bra bit över 16 timmar i våra praktiska WiFi-tester. Men Moto G8 Power erbjuder mer än bara batteritid. Kamerorna var exempelvis förvånansvärt bra, precis som den nästan helt rena Android-upplevelsen. Totalt sett har Moto G8 Power rejäl hårdvara för sitt pris.

Motorola Moto G8 Power kommer i synnerhet att övertyga med sin batteritid.

Även om enheten är välbyggd gör batteriet den något tjock. Huruvida detta stör dig är en fråga om smak, men den hamnar däremot efter konkurrenterna i fråga om WiFi-anslutbarhet. Att inte har stöd för mer än WiFi 4-standarden räcker för de flesta hemmanätverk, men det innebär också att konkurrenterna går om Moto G8 Power på den punkten. I slutändan är Motorola Moto G8 Power en bra och billig telefon. Huruvida bristerna kommer störa dig beror på vad du värdesätter hos en smartphone.

Motorola Moto G8 Power - 03/21/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Design
80%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
95%
Anslutningar
41 / 70 → 59%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
83%
Spelprestanda
13 / 64 → 21%
Programprestanda
59 / 86 → 68%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 84%
Camera
59%
Medel
72%
78%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Massor av batteritid och bra kameror (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2020-03-30 (Update: 2020-03-30)
Alex Alderson
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - News Editor - @aldersonaj