Notebookcheck

Test: Motorola Moto E7 Plus - Uppdaterad mobil från instegsklassen (Sammanfattning)

Mer kraft, större batteri. Motorolas Moto E7 Plus påminner mycket om sin systermodell utan Plus på slutet, men den har mer datorkraft och högre batterikapacitet. Är det värt att betala 400 kronor extra för den här instegstelefonen?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
, , , , , ,
sökrelation
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Motorola Moto E7 Plus (Moto E Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 8 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A73 / 53
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.50 tum 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixlar 270 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 49 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 512 GB, delad, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Närhet, microUSB
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM, UMTS, LTE, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9 x 165 x 75
Batteri
5000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.7, fasjämförande-AF, LED-blixt, Video @1080p/​60fps (Kamera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, skärpedjup (Kamera 2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.2, 26mm, 1/4", 1.12µm, Video @1080p/​30fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Kabel, Laddare, SIM-verktyg, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR: 0.64 W/kg (huvud), 1.33 W/kg (kropp); FM-radio, fanless
Vikt
200 g, Strömförsörjning: 60 g
Pris
150 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Bewertung
Rating Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
76 %7
02/2021
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
SD 460, Adreno 610
200 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
75 %7
02/2021
Motorola Moto E7
Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320
180 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
78 %7
01/2021
Xiaomi Poco M3
SD 662, Adreno 610
198 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.53"2340x1080
74 %7
05/2020
Samsung Galaxy M11
SD 450, Adreno 506
197 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.40"1560x720
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Motorola Moto E7 Plus

Storleksjämförelse

165 mm 75 mm 9 mm 200 g164.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.9 mm 180 g162.3 mm 77.3 mm 9.6 mm 198 g161.4 mm 76.3 mm 9 mm 197 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco M3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
301 (209min - 341max) MBit/s ∼100% +374%
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
802.11 b/g/n
63.5 (41min - 73max) MBit/s ∼21%
Motorola Moto E7
802.11 b/g/n
48.8 (26min - 69max) MBit/s ∼16% -23%
Samsung Galaxy M11
802.11 b/g/n
40.5 (12min - 52max) MBit/s ∼13% -36%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco M3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
284 (186min - 366max) MBit/s ∼100% +385%
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
802.11 b/g/n
58.5 (28min - 80max) MBit/s ∼21%
Motorola Moto E7
802.11 b/g/n
41.6 (11min - 65max) MBit/s ∼15% -29%
Samsung Galaxy M11
802.11 b/g/n
25.8 (8min - 41max) MBit/s ∼9% -56%
051015202530354045505560657075706346727061517273635172736648596468466072714170687054617170706346727061517273635172736648596468466072714170687054617170806362386468674634696857356871583363696632707060466370682869Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø63.2 (41-73)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø58.5 (28-80)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
65.2 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
67.9 ∆E
65.6 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
77.4 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
82.7 ∆E
70 ∆E
51.3 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto E7 Plus: 46.7 ∆E min: 14.19 - max: 82.69 ∆E
ColorChecker
18 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto E7 Plus: 9.51 ∆E min: 2.62 - max: 18.02 ∆E
457
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 471 cd/m² Medel: 446.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.9 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 471 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1239:1 (Svärta: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.97 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.285
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Motorola Moto E7
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Poco M3
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Samsung Galaxy M11
PLS TFT LCD, 1560x720, 6.40
Response Times
-14%
19%
19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
59 (30, 29)
61 (30, 31)
-3%
44 (20.4, 23.6)
25%
49 (24, 25)
17%
Response Time Black / White *
40 (19, 21)
50 (29, 21)
-25%
28 (13.2, 14.8)
30%
32 (15, 17)
20%
PWM Frequency
869.6 (25)
892.9 (3)
3%
Screen
-9%
35%
-14%
Brightness middle
471
470
0%
465
-1%
430
-9%
Brightness
446
445
0%
428
-4%
406
-9%
Brightness Distribution
90
92
2%
89
-1%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.38
0.35
8%
0.21
45%
0.52
-37%
Contrast
1239
1343
8%
2214
79%
827
-33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.97
5.69
-43%
1.7
57%
4.55
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.47
13.4
-79%
3.5
53%
7.93
-6%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.2
3.5
33%
2.4
54%
5.4
-4%
Gamma
2.285 96%
2.264 97%
2.16 102%
2.103 105%
CCT
7791 83%
7089 92%
6664 98%
7793 83%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-12% / -10%
27% / 31%
3% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 30 ms rise
↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 869.6 Hz ≤ 25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 869.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 869.6 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9679 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
1270 Points ∼66%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
491 Points ∼26% -61%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1275 Points ∼67% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
498 Points ∼26% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (1135 - 1270, n=5)
1176 Points ∼61% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=197, last 2 years)
1913 Points ∼100% +51%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
254 Points ∼46%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
134 Points ∼24% -47%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
316 Points ∼57% +24%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
131 Points ∼24% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (246 - 256, n=5)
251 Points ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=197, last 2 years)
554 Points ∼100% +118%
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
5669 Points ∼74%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5296 Points ∼69% -7%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
6042 Points ∼79% +7%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
4642 Points ∼60% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (5316 - 5869, n=5)
5633 Points ∼73% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=268, last 2 years)
7674 Points ∼100% +35%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
238 Points ∼8%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
369 Points ∼12% +55%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (236 - 247, n=4)
241 Points ∼8% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=59, last 2 years)
3077 Points ∼100% +1193%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
241 Points ∼9%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
369 Points ∼13% +53%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
153 Points ∼5% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (241 - 254, n=4)
244 Points ∼9% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=61, last 2 years)
2804 Points ∼100% +1063%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
2171 Points ∼75%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1014 Points ∼35% -53%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2298 Points ∼80% +6%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1826 Points ∼63% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (1953 - 2190, n=5)
2117 Points ∼73% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=267, last 2 years)
2883 Points ∼100% +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
727 Points ∼21%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
408 Points ∼12% -44%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1032 Points ∼30% +42%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
404 Points ∼12% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (727 - 734, n=5)
731 Points ∼21% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=267, last 2 years)
3412 Points ∼100% +369%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
853 Points ∼28%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
470 Points ∼15% -45%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1176 Points ∼38% +38%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
491 Points ∼16% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (849 - 859, n=5)
855 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=267, last 2 years)
3071 Points ∼100% +260%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
2152 Points ∼76%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
936 Points ∼33% -57%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2221 Points ∼78% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1787 Points ∼63% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (1963 - 2152, n=4)
2083 Points ∼73% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=265, last 2 years)
2840 Points ∼100% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
1295 Points ∼27%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
775 Points ∼16% -40%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1779 Points ∼37% +37%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
716 Points ∼15% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (1295 - 1310, n=4)
1304 Points ∼27% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=267, last 2 years)
4754 Points ∼100% +267%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
1421 Points ∼38%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
806 Points ∼21% -43%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1861 Points ∼49% +31%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
820 Points ∼22% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (1414 - 1428, n=4)
1422 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=267, last 2 years)
3783 Points ∼100% +166%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
2228 Points ∼80%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1139 Points ∼41% -49%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2424 Points ∼88% +9%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1827 Points ∼66% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (2097 - 2250, n=5)
2182 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=258, last 2 years)
2769 Points ∼100% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
726 Points ∼26%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
348 Points ∼12% -52%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1022 Points ∼36% +41%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
349 Points ∼12% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (726 - 740, n=5)
732 Points ∼26% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=258, last 2 years)
2804 Points ∼100% +286%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
854 Points ∼33%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
412 Points ∼16% -52%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1173 Points ∼45% +37%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
439 Points ∼17% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (854 - 864, n=5)
859 Points ∼33% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=258, last 2 years)
2627 Points ∼100% +208%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
2186 Points ∼80%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1134 Points ∼42% -48%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2161 Points ∼79% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1901 Points ∼70% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (2099 - 2248, n=5)
2173 Points ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=258, last 2 years)
2728 Points ∼100% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
1270 Points ∼32%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
734 Points ∼19% -42%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1715 Points ∼43% +35%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
703 Points ∼18% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (1270 - 1293, n=5)
1283 Points ∼32% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=258, last 2 years)
3949 Points ∼100% +211%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
1400 Points ∼42%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
796 Points ∼24% -43%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1797 Points ∼54% +28%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
829 Points ∼25% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (1400 - 1419, n=5)
1411 Points ∼42% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=258, last 2 years)
3345 Points ∼100% +139%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
16068 Points ∼70%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
12043 Points ∼53% -25%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
19025 Points ∼83% +18%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
14862 Points ∼65% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (15499 - 17962, n=3)
16510 Points ∼72% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 59268, n=231, last 2 years)
22801 Points ∼100% +42%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
16610 Points ∼30%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
13302 Points ∼24% -20%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
23495 Points ∼42% +41%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12673 Points ∼23% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (16610 - 16821, n=3)
16721 Points ∼30% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=230, last 2 years)
55452 Points ∼100% +234%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
16486 Points ∼43%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
13000 Points ∼34% -21%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
22329 Points ∼58% +35%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13087 Points ∼34% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (16441 - 17062, n=3)
16663 Points ∼43% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=230, last 2 years)
38643 Points ∼100% +134%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
6.5 fps ∼47%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.5 fps ∼32% -31%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4.4 fps ∼32% -32%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.7 fps ∼27% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (6.5 - 6.8, n=5)
6.6 fps ∼47% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=268, last 2 years)
13.9 fps ∼100% +114%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
2 fps ∼21%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.4 fps ∼15% -30%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼29% +40%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1.1 fps ∼12% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (2 - 2, n=5)
2 fps ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=267, last 2 years)
9.55 fps ∼100% +378%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
11 fps ∼53%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7.2 fps ∼34% -35%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7.5 fps ∼36% -32%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.4 fps ∼31% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (11 - 11, n=5)
11 fps ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 66, n=267, last 2 years)
20.9 fps ∼100% +90%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, Adreno 610, 4096
6 fps ∼25%
Motorola Moto E7
Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4 fps ∼17% -33%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
8.3 fps ∼35% +38%
Samsung Galaxy M11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.3 fps ∼14% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
  (6 - 6.1, n=5)
6.04 fps ∼25% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=267, last 2 years)
24 fps ∼100% +300%
Motorola Moto E7 PlusMotorola Moto E7Xiaomi Poco M3Samsung Galaxy M11Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-32%
38%
-17%
-24%
36%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
64.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
64.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
58.5 (11.2 - 83.3, n=143)
-9%
58.4 (1.7 - 83.3, n=193, last 2 years)
-9%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
85.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
82.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
77.5 (21.1 - 108, n=143)
-5%
76.2 (13.4 - 154, n=193, last 2 years)
-7%
Random Write 4KB
97.1
13.5
-86%
154.1
59%
78.09
-20%
28.8 (3.4 - 147, n=162)
-70%
108 (4.78 - 319, n=274, last 2 years)
11%
Random Read 4KB
92.4
58
-37%
147.03
59%
73.87
-20%
58.1 (11.4 - 149, n=162)
-37%
126 (13.5 - 325, n=274, last 2 years)
36%
Sequential Write 256KB
192.7
101
-48%
269.2
40%
81.43
-58%
177 (40 - 274, n=162)
-8%
301 (11.9 - 1321, n=274, last 2 years)
56%
Sequential Read 256KB
313.8
261
-17%
509.23
62%
297.6
-5%
274 (95.6 - 704, n=162)
-13%
711 (41.9 - 2037, n=274, last 2 years)
127%
Hög belastning
 39.3 °C36.7 °C34.8 °C 
 38.9 °C36.1 °C34.4 °C 
 38.1 °C36.7 °C34.5 °C 
Max: 39.3 °C
Medel: 36.6 °C
33.1 °C37.2 °C41.9 °C
33.9 °C37.1 °C38.4 °C
34.9 °C37.4 °C38.8 °C
Max: 41.9 °C
Medel: 37 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  38.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.546.22532.637.83127.534.14030.232.25032.332.16325.5258017.819.510022.623.512514.627.116013.335.72001141.22509.742.3315851.24008.654.350011.259.763013.760.780015.360.2100017.469.4125010.370.8160010.569.1200010.669.6250011.265.2315012.563.7400014.362.3500015.263.563001566.3800016.166.21000017.364.31250016.2651600016.955.4SPL26.178.5N0.741median 13.7median 62.3Delta2.88.242.548.839.34130.432.933.736.536.937.233.230.124.222.224.627.717.133.816.928.415.135.113.240.512.944.51252.213.66115.864.820.669.719.772.514.275.114.673.615.272.815.469.316.866.817.963.119.172.2198119.783.221.574.82158.221.957.874.771.130.187.227.323.71.263.8median 16.9median 64.82.712.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto E7 PlusMotorola Moto E7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto E7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto E7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto E7 Plus
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto E7
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M3
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M11
5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
946
867
-8%
1249
32%
880
-7%
889 (425 - 2000, n=283, last 2 years)
-6%
Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15tim 46min

För

+ Jämförelsevis snabb SoC
+ Bra batteritid
+ Skaplig högtalare
+ Mycket minne

Emot

- Skärmen har en viss blå ton
- Saknar NFC
- Lång laddningstid

Omdöme - Instegstelefon med mervärde

Recension av Motorola Moto E7 Plus.
Recension av Motorola Moto E7 Plus.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Motorolas Moto E7 Plus kostar 400 kronor mer än Moto E7, men du får i gengäld en hel del uppgraderingar: Till att börja med har den en betydligt snabbare SoC, dubbelt så mycket lagring, längre batteritid, en bättre högtalare och aningen snabbare WiFi. Således står sig Moto E7 Plus bra i sitt prisskikt, även om Xiaomi Poco M3 har lite mer att erbjuda här och där.

Gillar man mobila betallösningar kan det vara att problem att den saknar NFC, men faktum är att det är väldig sällsynt i det här prisskiktet. På samma gång är kameran skaplig och ger bra resultat vid låg ljusnivå. Men vi måste återigen vara tydliga med att man inte kan förvänta sig mirakel för såpass lite pengar, även om resultatet är skapligt tack vare pixel-binning.

Motorola Moto E7 Plus är en bra smartphone på instegsnivå som inte har några större svagheter.

Så om du väljer mellan Moto E7 och E7 Plus och inte är orolig för de extra slantarna borde du definitivt välja Moto E7 Plus. Även om man bara letar efter en gedigen och billig instegstelefon kommer man få valuta för pengarna.

Motorola Moto E7 Plus - 02/13/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design
78%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
88%
Anslutningar
36 / 70 → 52%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
84%
Spelprestanda
11 / 64 → 17%
Programprestanda
60 / 86 → 70%
Temperatur
89%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
66 / 90 → 73%
Camera
52%
Medel
70%
76%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 175691 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Motorola Moto E7 Plus - Uppdaterad mobil från instegsklassen (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2021-02-18 (Update: 2021-02-18)