Test: Motorola Moto E6s - Mobiltelefon för småpengar (Sammanfattning)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, Video @1080p/30fps
Jämförelseenheter
Bewertung | Rating Version | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75 % | 7 | 05/2020 | Motorola Moto E6s Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 160 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.1" | 1560x720 | |
| 74 % | 7 | 12/2019 | Nokia 2.3 Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300 | 183 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.2" | 1520x720 | |
| 75 % | 7 | 01/2020 | Huawei Y6s Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300 | 150 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.09" | 1560x720 | |
| 75 % | 7 | 11/2019 | Xiaomi Redmi 8A SD 439, Adreno 505 | 188 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.22" | 1520x720 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Nokia 2.3 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Nokia 2.3 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 488 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1952:1 (Svärta: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.02 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6
93.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.252
| Motorola Moto E6s IPS, 1560x720, 6.1 | Nokia 2.3 IPS, 1520x720, 6.2 | Huawei Y6s IPS, 1560x720, 6.09 | Xiaomi Redmi 8A IPS, 1520x720, 6.22 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 8% | -9% | 1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 64 (31, 33) | 49.2 (27.6, 21.6) 23% | 54 (25, 29) 16% | 52 (21, 31) 19% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 (3, 21) | 25.6 (12.4, 13.2) -7% | 32 (15, 17) -33% | 28 (11, 17) -17% |
| PWM Frequency | 7692 (25) | 100 (10) | 595 (15) | |
| Screen | -15% | -35% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 488 | 515 6% | 424 -13% | 441 -10% |
| Brightness | 481 | 488 1% | 397 -17% | 421 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 92 -3% | 85 -11% | 89 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.23 8% | 0.35 -40% | 0.38 -52% |
| Contrast | 1952 | 2239 15% | 1211 -38% | 1161 -41% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 5.02 | 6.1 -22% | 6.45 -28% | 4.46 11% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 8.99 | 13.4 -49% | 12.76 -42% | 8.01 11% |
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 4.4 | 7.7 -75% | 8.5 -93% | 5.4 -23% |
| Gamma | 2.252 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.231 99% | 2.146 103% |
| CCT | 7841 83% | 8639 75% | 9108 71% | 7901 82% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-10% | -22% /
-30% | -7% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 31 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 33 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17612 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| Nokia 2.3 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3805 - 5251, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 15299, n=512) | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4404 - 6922, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=670) | |
| GFXBench | |
| Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| Nokia 2.3 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4.1 - 4.8, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=308) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| Nokia 2.3 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (1.3 - 1.6, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 101, n=306) | |
| Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| Nokia 2.3 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (6.4 - 7.6, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=312) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| Nokia 2.3 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 8A | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3.5 - 4.7, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 257, n=311) | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | Nokia 2.3 | Huawei Y6s | Xiaomi Redmi 8A | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 19% | -4% | 0% | -14% | 16% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 63.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 63.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0% | 60.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5% | 61.7 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501) -3% | 52.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=167) -18% | 51.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=530) -20% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 83.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2% | 80.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2% | 84.9 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501) 3% | 71.1 (8.2 - 96.5, n=167) -14% | 69.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=530) -16% |
| Random Write 4KB | 17.7 | 30.33 71% | 18.6 5% | 15.8 -11% | 19.2 (0.75 - 89.5, n=210) 8% | 35.5 (0.14 - 319, n=881) 101% |
| Random Read 4KB | 69.4 | 69.6 0% | 46.7 -33% | 73.1 5% | 41.1 (3.59 - 117, n=210) -41% | 58.9 (1.59 - 324, n=881) -15% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 103.5 | 149.18 44% | 118 14% | 106.4 3% | 96.7 (14.8 - 189, n=210) -7% | 127 (2.99 - 911, n=881) 23% |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 275 | 261.84 -5% | 263.2 -4% | 282 3% | 239 (25.8 - 452, n=210) -13% | 339 (12.1 - 1802, n=881) 23% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto E6s audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
| Motorola Moto E6s 3000 mAh | Nokia 2.3 4000 mAh | Huawei Y6s 3020 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 8A 5000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing 1.3 | 806 | 919 14% | 743 -8% | 1145 42% | 694 (223 - 2636, n=743) -14% |
För
Emot
Omdöme – Billig och lätt
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Motorola Moto E6s är en ganska lätt och praktisk telefon som ser tjusig ut och känns ganska välgjord tack vare färggradienten på baksidan. Kameran tar användbara bilder, som dock har låg kontrast. Men det lilla batteriet ger skaplig batteritid och prestandan är rimlig för den här prisnivån.
Man bör inte förvänta sig mirakel för 1.000 kronor, men Motorola har tillverkat en totalt sett skaplig smartphone från denna begränsade budget. En fingeravtrycksläsare är inte alltid självklart i det här prisskiktet och en dedikerad minneskortsplats är trevligt. Något annat som är positivt: även om den bara hade Android 9 i vår recension så hade den aktuella säkerhetspatchar.
Om du letar efter en lätt och billig smartphone som fortfarande har användbar batteritid kommer du klara dig bra med Motorola Moto E6s.
Vi upplevde att dess riktigt långsamma WLAN, som inte ens kunde stå sig i en jämförelse mot andra modeller i samma klass, var ett problem. Men trots det kan vi rekommendera Motorola Moto E6s åt alla som gillar lätta telefoner, så länge man bara planerar att använda enheten för mindre krävande aktiviteter.
Motorola Moto E6s - 05/06/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt