Notebookcheck

Test: Motorola Moto E6s - Mobiltelefon för småpengar (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 05/11/2020

Lätt soluppgång. Motorola Moto E6s försöker fånga uppmärksamheten med gradienteffekter och en dualkamera. Priset på runt 1.000 kronor är riktigt konkurrenskraftigt, men kan Motorolas billiga telefon stå ut från mängden?

Motorola Moto E6s
Motorola Moto E6s (Moto E Serie)
Processor
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
Grafikkort
PowerVR GE8320
Minne
2048 MB 
Skärm
6.1 tum 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixlar 282 PPI, Kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 24 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 256GB, dedikerad, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Sensorer: Accelerationssensor, Närhetssensor
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B18/​B20/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.5 x 155.6 x 73
Batteri
3000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, Fasjämförande AF, LED-blixt, video @1080p/30fps (kamera 1); 2.0MP, f/2.4, skärpedjup (kamera 2)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2, Video @1080p/​30fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på baksidan, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare, USB-kabel, 24 Månader Garanti, FM-radio, notis-LED; SAR-värden: 0.455 W/kg (Huvud), 1.558 W/kg (Kropp), fanless
Vikt
160 g, Strömförsörjning: 49 g
Pris
99 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Jämförelseenheter

Bewertung
Rating Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
75 %7
05/2020
Motorola Moto E6s
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
160 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.1"1560x720
74 %7
12/2019
Nokia 2.3
Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300
183 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.2"1520x720
75 %7
01/2020
Huawei Y6s
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300
150 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.09"1560x720
75 %7
11/2019
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
SD 439, Adreno 505
188 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.22"1520x720

Storleksjämförelse

157.69 mm 75.41 mm 8.68 mm 183 g156.5 mm 75.4 mm 9.4 mm 188 g156.3 mm 73.5 mm 8 mm 150 g155.6 mm 73 mm 8.5 mm 160 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 2.3
802.11 b/g/n
70.6 (min: 53, max: 109) MBit/s ∼100% +64%
Huawei Y6s
802.11 b/g/n
58.3 (min: 55, max: 61) MBit/s ∼83% +36%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
802.11 b/g/n
56 (min: 54, max: 58) MBit/s ∼79% +30%
Motorola Moto E6s
802.11 b/g/n
43 (min: 26, max: 61) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 2.3
802.11 b/g/n
61.3 (min: 10, max: 110) MBit/s ∼100% +73%
Huawei Y6s
802.11 b/g/n
55.8 (min: 53, max: 65) MBit/s ∼91% +58%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
802.11 b/g/n
55.3 (min: 49, max: 60) MBit/s ∼90% +56%
Motorola Moto E6s
802.11 b/g/n
35.4 (min: 5, max: 57) MBit/s ∼58%
010203040506070Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø42.7 (26-61)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø36.6 (5-57)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
60 ∆E
51.3 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
61.3 ∆E
62.3 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
34.9 ∆E
72.6 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
77.8 ∆E
68.3 ∆E
50.6 ∆E
36 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto E6s: 44.34 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 77.84 ∆E
ColorChecker
15.5 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
9 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto E6s: 9.99 ∆E min: 2.44 - max: 15.53 ∆E
473
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 494 cd/m² Medel: 481.1 cd/m² Minimum: 7.86 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 488 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1952:1 (Svärta: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.02 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
93.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.252
Motorola Moto E6s
IPS, 1560x720, 6.1
Nokia 2.3
IPS, 1520x720, 6.2
Huawei Y6s
IPS, 1560x720, 6.09
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
IPS, 1520x720, 6.22
Response Times
8%
-9%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
64 (31, 33)
49.2 (27.6, 21.6)
23%
54 (25, 29)
16%
52 (21, 31)
19%
Response Time Black / White *
24 (3, 21)
25.6 (12.4, 13.2)
-7%
32 (15, 17)
-33%
28 (11, 17)
-17%
PWM Frequency
7692 (25)
100 (10)
595 (15)
Screen
-15%
-35%
-15%
Brightness middle
488
515
6%
424
-13%
441
-10%
Brightness
481
488
1%
397
-17%
421
-12%
Brightness Distribution
95
92
-3%
85
-11%
89
-6%
Black Level *
0.25
0.23
8%
0.35
-40%
0.38
-52%
Contrast
1952
2239
15%
1211
-38%
1161
-41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.02
6.1
-22%
6.45
-28%
4.46
11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.99
13.4
-49%
12.76
-42%
8.01
11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.4
7.7
-75%
8.5
-93%
5.4
-23%
Gamma
2.252 98%
2.26 97%
2.231 99%
2.146 103%
CCT
7841 83%
8639 75%
9108 71%
7901 82%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / -10%
-22% / -30%
-7% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31 ms rise
↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18300 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5197 Points ∼92%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4868 Points ∼86% -6%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
3936 Points ∼69% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
4708 Points ∼83% -9%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3805 - 5237, n=12)
4579 Points ∼81% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=463)
5673 Points ∼100% +9%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6873 Points ∼100%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
4658 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6026 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4404 - 6922, n=12)
5765 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=624)
6193 Points ∼90% -10%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1187 Points ∼56%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
837 Points ∼40% -29%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1061 Points ∼50% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1627 Points ∼77% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (912 - 1187, n=11)
998 Points ∼47% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5728, n=469)
2110 Points ∼100% +78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
451 Points ∼23%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
253 Points ∼13% -44%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
443 Points ∼22% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
418 Points ∼21% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (376 - 451, n=11)
425 Points ∼22% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9389, n=469)
1971 Points ∼100% +337%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
523 Points ∼29%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
299 Points ∼16% -43%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
509 Points ∼28% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
501 Points ∼27% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (435 - 523, n=11)
487 Points ∼27% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8111, n=470)
1830 Points ∼100% +250%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1189 Points ∼59%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
854 Points ∼42% -28%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1015 Points ∼50% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1618 Points ∼80% +36%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (900 - 1195, n=12)
995 Points ∼49% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5718, n=499)
2021 Points ∼100% +70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
742 Points ∼28%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
459 Points ∼18% -38%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
712 Points ∼27% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
725 Points ∼28% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (452 - 742, n=12)
677 Points ∼26% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=499)
2616 Points ∼100% +253%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
810 Points ∼37%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
512 Points ∼23% -37%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
763 Points ∼35% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
826 Points ∼38% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (513 - 810, n=12)
728 Points ∼33% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=499)
2200 Points ∼100% +172%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1131 Points ∼56%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
822 Points ∼41% -27%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
435 Points ∼22% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1657 Points ∼83% +47%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (860 - 1131, n=11)
970 Points ∼48% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4987, n=549)
2003 Points ∼100% +77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
397 Points ∼24%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
219 Points ∼13% -45%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
508 Points ∼31% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
369 Points ∼22% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (257 - 397, n=11)
323 Points ∼20% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=549)
1646 Points ∼100% +315%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
464 Points ∼29%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
262 Points ∼17% -44%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
304 Points ∼19% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
446 Points ∼28% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (305 - 464, n=11)
379 Points ∼24% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7190, n=550)
1575 Points ∼100% +239%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1124 Points ∼60%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
791 Points ∼42% -30%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1017 Points ∼54% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1654 Points ∼88% +47%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (854 - 1139, n=12)
978 Points ∼52% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=591)
1870 Points ∼100% +66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
655 Points ∼31%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
414 Points ∼19% -37%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
403 Points ∼19% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
719 Points ∼34% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (370 - 655, n=12)
521 Points ∼24% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12394, n=590)
2146 Points ∼100% +228%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
722 Points ∼39%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
463 Points ∼25% -36%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
465 Points ∼25% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
822 Points ∼44% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (428 - 722, n=12)
580 Points ∼31% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9123, n=593)
1854 Points ∼100% +157%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
14651 Points ∼97%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
15179 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
12594 Points ∼83% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9674 - 15069, n=12)
11892 Points ∼78% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 57583, n=739)
14942 Points ∼98% +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11220 Points ∼46%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7482 Points ∼31% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13408 Points ∼55% +20%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9536 - 11349, n=12)
10579 Points ∼43% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=737)
24413 Points ∼100% +118%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11836 Points ∼61%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8432 Points ∼43% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13218 Points ∼68% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9835 - 11921, n=12)
10800 Points ∼55% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 110468, n=737)
19480 Points ∼100% +65%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.2 fps ∼39%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.8 fps ∼26% -33%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
4.2 fps ∼39% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.9 fps ∼36% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4.1 - 4.3, n=10)
4.24 fps ∼40% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=261)
10.7 fps ∼100% +155%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.4 fps ∼18%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.84 fps ∼11% -40%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1.4 fps ∼18% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1.2 fps ∼16% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (1.3 - 1.6, n=10)
1.39 fps ∼18% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=259)
7.62 fps ∼100% +444%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.7 fps ∼42%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.4 fps ∼28% -34%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
6.9 fps ∼43% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6.7 fps ∼42% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (6.7 - 6.8, n=10)
6.76 fps ∼42% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=265)
16 fps ∼100% +139%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.8 fps ∼21%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.3 fps ∼13% -39%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
3.8 fps ∼21% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.6 fps ∼20% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3.5 - 4.7, n=10)
3.77 fps ∼21% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=264)
17.9 fps ∼100% +371%
Motorola Moto E6sNokia 2.3Huawei Y6sXiaomi Redmi 8AAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
19%
-4%
0%
-16%
5%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
60.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
61.7 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
51.4 (3.4 - 87.1, n=157)
-19%
50.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=491)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
80.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
84.9 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
70.4 (8.2 - 96.5, n=157)
-14%
68.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=491)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
17.7
30.33
71%
18.6
5%
15.8
-11%
18.4 (0.75 - 77.3, n=200)
4%
29.5 (0.14 - 272, n=828)
67%
Random Read 4KB
69.4
69.6
0%
46.7
-33%
73.1
5%
40.2 (3.59 - 117, n=200)
-42%
54.2 (1.59 - 265, n=828)
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB
103.5
149.18
44%
118
14%
106.4
3%
95.6 (14.8 - 189, n=200)
-8%
113 (2.99 - 750, n=828)
9%
Sequential Read 256KB
275
261.84
-5%
263.2
-4%
282
3%
237 (25.8 - 452, n=200)
-14%
311 (12.1 - 1781, n=828)
13%
Hög belastning
 33.8 °C31.8 °C30.7 °C 
 33.9 °C31.8 °C30.9 °C 
 33.3 °C31.9 °C30.5 °C 
Max: 33.9 °C
Medel: 32.1 °C
29.6 °C32.6 °C35.1 °C
29.6 °C32.6 °C35.4 °C
30.5 °C32.3 °C34.6 °C
Max: 35.4 °C
Medel: 32.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  39.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.437.4253536.53127.128.6402633.55030.437.36325.232.38022.725.710025.525.212520.126.416019.230.520017.835.725017.841.131516.145.640016.652.750015.96263014.364.280014.770.2100014.874.8125014.373.7160014.167.8200016.367.4250014.468.1315013.865.5400013.956.6500014.264.1630014.569.6800014.676.5100001574.51250015.360.61600015.761.2SPL71.226.982.3N25.60.950.7median 15median 64.1Delta1.611.6434336.837.832.83233.732.640.135.331.333.424.724.725.622.522.125.719.930.719.337.617.242.317.449.517.156.317.361.31564.31566.518.671.414.575.515.773.114.473.814.474.914.172.114.267.514.365.314.568.414.571.314.572.814.571.214.754.167.562.464.460.727.583.72015.51612.9154.4median 15median 66.51.512.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto E6sXiaomi Redmi 8A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto E6s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi 8A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto E6s
3000 mAh
Nokia 2.3
4000 mAh
Huawei Y6s
3020 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
806
919
14%
743
-8%
1145
42%
681 (223 - 2636, n=695)
-16%
Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13tim 26min

För

+ Aktuella säkerhetsuppdateringar vid skrivande stund
+ Bra batteritid
+ Fingeravtrycksläsare
+ Dedikerad microSD-plats
+ Stiligt hölje
+ Lätt

Emot

- Riktigt långsamt WLAN
- Långa laddningstider
- Kamera med låg kontrast

Omdöme – Billig och lätt

Recension av Motorola Moto E6s. Recensionsex från Motorola Germany.
Recension av Motorola Moto E6s. Recensionsex från Motorola Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Motorola Moto E6s är en ganska lätt och praktisk telefon som ser tjusig ut och känns ganska välgjord tack vare färggradienten på baksidan. Kameran tar användbara bilder, som dock har låg kontrast. Men det lilla batteriet ger skaplig batteritid och prestandan är rimlig för den här prisnivån.

Man bör inte förvänta sig mirakel för 1.000 kronor, men Motorola har tillverkat en totalt sett skaplig smartphone från denna begränsade budget. En fingeravtrycksläsare är inte alltid självklart i det här prisskiktet och en dedikerad minneskortsplats är trevligt. Något annat som är positivt: även om den bara hade Android 9 i vår recension så hade den aktuella säkerhetspatchar.

Om du letar efter en lätt och billig smartphone som fortfarande har användbar batteritid kommer du klara dig bra med Motorola Moto E6s.

Vi upplevde att dess riktigt långsamma WLAN, som inte ens kunde stå sig i en jämförelse mot andra modeller i samma klass, var ett problem. Men trots det kan vi rekommendera Motorola Moto E6s åt alla som gillar lätta telefoner, så länge man bara planerar att använda enheten för mindre krävande aktiviteter.

Motorola Moto E6s - 05/06/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design
76%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
92%
Anslutningar
33 / 70 → 47%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
85%
Spelprestanda
6 / 64 → 10%
Programprestanda
54 / 86 → 63%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
69 / 90 → 77%
Camera
40%
Medel
69%
75%
Smartphone - Vägt medel
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Motorola Moto E6s - Mobiltelefon för småpengar (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2020-05-11 (Update: 2020-05-11)