Test: Motorola Moto E6s - Mobiltelefon för småpengar (Sammanfattning)

Name: Motorola Moto E6s
Brand: Motorola

Lätt soluppgång. Motorola Moto E6s försöker fånga uppmärksamheten med gradienteffekter och en dualkamera. Priset på runt 1.000 kronor är riktigt konkurrenskraftigt, men kan Motorolas billiga telefon stå ut från mängden?

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 05/11/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Motorola Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Jämförelseenheter

Bewertung	Rating Version	Datum	Modell	Gewicht	Laufwerk	Groesse	Aufloesung
74.8 %	7	05/2020	Motorola Moto E6s Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320	160 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.10"	1560x720
74.3 %	7	12/2019	Nokia 2.3 Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300	183 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.20"	1520x720
75.3 %	7	01/2020	Huawei Y6s Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300	150 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.09"	1560x720
74.5 %	7	11/2019	Xiaomi Redmi 8A SD 439, Adreno 505	188 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.22"	1520x720

Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» T opp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones

Storleksjämförelse

Nokia 2.3 Xiaomi Redmi 8A Huawei Y6s Motorola Moto E6s ❌

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 2.3 802.11 b/g/n	61.3 (10^min - 110^max) MBit/s ∼100% +73%
Huawei Y6s 802.11 b/g/n	55.8 (53^min - 65^max) MBit/s ∼91% +58%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A 802.11 b/g/n	55.3 (49^min - 60^max) MBit/s ∼90% +56%
Motorola Moto E6s 802.11 b/g/n	35.4 (5^min - 57^max) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 2.3 802.11 b/g/n	70.6 (53^min - 109^max) MBit/s ∼100% +64%
Huawei Y6s 802.11 b/g/n	58.3 (55^min - 61^max) MBit/s ∼83% +36%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A 802.11 b/g/n	56 (54^min - 58^max) MBit/s ∼79% +30%
Motorola Moto E6s 802.11 b/g/n	43 (26^min - 61^max) MBit/s ∼61%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø42.7 (26-61)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø36.6 (5-57)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Motorola Moto E6s

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Motorola Moto E6s

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Motorola Moto E6s

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Olympus E-M10 II

ColorChecker Motorola Moto E6s: 9.99 ∆E min: 2.44 - max: 15.53 ∆E

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.se/Test-Motorola-Moto-E6s-Mobiltelefon-foer-smaapengar-Sammanfattning.464832.0.html">Motorola Moto E6s</a> — Motorola Moto E6s


473 cd/m²	474 cd/m²	494 cd/m²
471 cd/m²	488 cd/m²	486 cd/m²
476 cd/m²	477 cd/m²	491 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 494 cd/m² Medel: 481.1 cd/m² Minimum: 7.86 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 488 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1952:1 (Svärta: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.02 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
93.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.252

	Motorola Moto E6s IPS, 1560x720, 6.10	Nokia 2.3 IPS, 1520x720, 6.20	Huawei Y6s IPS, 1560x720, 6.09	Xiaomi Redmi 8A IPS, 1520x720, 6.22
Response Times		8%	-9%	1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	64 ?(31, 33)	49.2 ?(27.6, 21.6) 23%	54 ?(25, 29) 16%	52 ?(21, 31) 19%
Response Time Black / White *	24 ?(3, 21)	25.6 ?(12.4, 13.2) -7%	32 ?(15, 17) -33%	28 ?(11, 17) -17%
PWM Frequency		7692 ?(25)	100 ?(10)	595 ?(15)
Screen		-15%	-35%	-15%
Brightness middle	488	515 6%	424 -13%	441 -10%
Brightness	481	488 1%	397 -17%	421 -12%
Brightness Distribution	95	92 -3%	85 -11%	89 -6%
Black Level *	0.25	0.23 8%	0.35 -40%	0.38 -52%
Contrast	1952	2239 15%	1211 -38%	1161 -41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	5.02	6.1 -22%	6.45 -28%	4.46 11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	8.99	13.4 -49%	12.76 -42%	8.01 11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	4.4	7.7 -75%	8.5 -93%	5.4 -23%
Gamma	2.252 ^98%	2.26 ^97%	2.231 ^99%	2.146 ^103%
CCT	7841 ^83%	8639 ^75%	9108 ^71%	7901 ^82%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-4% / -10%	-22% / -30%	-7% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 31 ms rise
64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17031 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6873 Points ∼68%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	4658 Points ∼46% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	6026 Points ∼60% -12%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4404 - 7465, n=18)	5847 Points ∼58% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (2689 - 19989, n=192, last 2 years)	10060 Points ∼100% +46%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	5197 Points ∼65%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	4868 Points ∼61% -6%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	3936 Points ∼49% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	4708 Points ∼59% -9%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3805 - 5380, n=21)	4696 Points ∼58% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=237, last 2 years)	8032 Points ∼100% +55%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	11836 Points ∼29%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	8432 Points ∼21% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	13218 Points ∼32% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9835 - 13960, n=20)	11460 Points ∼28% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2920 - 117606, n=172, last 2 years)	40733 Points ∼100% +244%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	11220 Points ∼19%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	7482 Points ∼13% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	13408 Points ∼23% +20%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9536 - 13491, n=20)	11373 Points ∼20% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2177 - 224130, n=172, last 2 years)	58264 Points ∼100% +419%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	14651 Points ∼62%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	15179 Points ∼65% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	12594 Points ∼54% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9080 - 15891, n=20)	12110 Points ∼52% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (8324 - 59268, n=172, last 2 years)	23457 Points ∼100% +60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	722 Points ∼21%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	463 Points ∼13% -36%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	465 Points ∼13% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	822 Points ∼24% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (428 - 830, n=23)	633 Points ∼18% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 11256, n=236, last 2 years)	3483 Points ∼100% +382%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	655 Points ∼16%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	414 Points ∼10% -37%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	403 Points ∼10% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	719 Points ∼18% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (370 - 750, n=23)	572 Points ∼14% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (54 - 16670, n=236, last 2 years)	4066 Points ∼100% +521%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1124 Points ∼40%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	791 Points ∼28% -30%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	1017 Points ∼36% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1654 Points ∼59% +47%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (854 - 1185, n=23)	1026 Points ∼36% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 5301, n=236, last 2 years)	2816 Points ∼100% +151%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	810 Points ∼19%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	512 Points ∼12% -37%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	763 Points ∼18% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	826 Points ∼19% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (513 - 873, n=23)	770 Points ∼18% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (149 - 11895, n=259, last 2 years)	4237 Points ∼100% +423%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	742 Points ∼14%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	459 Points ∼8% -38%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	712 Points ∼13% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	725 Points ∼13% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (452 - 823, n=23)	719 Points ∼13% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (122 - 31940, n=259, last 2 years)	5444 Points ∼100% +634%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1189 Points ∼39%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	854 Points ∼28% -28%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	1015 Points ∼34% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1618 Points ∼54% +36%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (900 - 1195, n=23)	1032 Points ∼34% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (620 - 5784, n=257, last 2 years)	3019 Points ∼100% +154%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	464 Points ∼17%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	262 Points ∼10% -44%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	304 Points ∼11% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	446 Points ∼17% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (269 - 470, n=22)	383 Points ∼14% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (78 - 9138, n=233, last 2 years)	2678 Points ∼100% +477%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	397 Points ∼14%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	219 Points ∼8% -45%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	508 Points ∼18% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	369 Points ∼13% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (222 - 405, n=22)	326 Points ∼11% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (62 - 11573, n=233, last 2 years)	2836 Points ∼100% +614%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1131 Points ∼40%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	822 Points ∼29% -27%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	435 Points ∼15% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1657 Points ∼58% +47%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (860 - 1175, n=22)	1022 Points ∼36% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 5318, n=233, last 2 years)	2835 Points ∼100% +151%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	523 Points ∼15%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	299 Points ∼9% -43%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	509 Points ∼15% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	501 Points ∼14% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (426 - 536, n=22)	482 Points ∼14% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 9839, n=260, last 2 years)	3460 Points ∼100% +562%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	451 Points ∼11%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	253 Points ∼6% -44%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	443 Points ∼11% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	418 Points ∼10% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (368 - 467, n=22)	418 Points ∼10% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (73 - 16221, n=260, last 2 years)	3993 Points ∼100% +785%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1187 Points ∼39%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	837 Points ∼27% -29%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	1061 Points ∼35% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1627 Points ∼53% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (912 - 1188, n=22)	1036 Points ∼34% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (620 - 5793, n=260, last 2 years)	3055 Points ∼100% +157%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6.7 fps ∼28%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	4.4 fps ∼18% -34%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	6.9 fps ∼29% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	6.7 fps ∼28% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (6.4 - 7.6, n=21)	6.9 fps ∼29% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1.5 - 73, n=267, last 2 years)	24.1 fps ∼100% +260%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	3.8 fps ∼13%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	2.3 fps ∼8% -39%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	3.8 fps ∼13% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	3.6 fps ∼13% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3.5 - 4.7, n=21)	3.81 fps ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.95 - 257, n=267, last 2 years)	28.4 fps ∼100% +647%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4.2 fps ∼26%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	2.8 fps ∼17% -33%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	4.2 fps ∼26% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	3.9 fps ∼24% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4.1 - 4.8, n=21)	4.35 fps ∼27% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=268, last 2 years)	16.2 fps ∼100% +286%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1.4 fps ∼13%
Nokia 2.3 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048	0.84 fps ∼8% -40%
Huawei Y6s Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072	1.4 fps ∼13% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048	1.2 fps ∼11% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (1.3 - 1.6, n=21)	1.39 fps ∼13% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.35 - 101, n=268, last 2 years)	11 fps ∼100% +686%

	Motorola Moto E6s	Nokia 2.3	Huawei Y6s	Xiaomi Redmi 8A	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		19%	-4%	0%	-12%	197%
Sequential Read 256KB	275	261.84 -5%	263.2 -4%	282 3%	240 ?(25.8 - 452, n=227) -13%	807 ?(41.9 - 2037, n=273, last 2 years) 193%
Sequential Write 256KB	103.5	149.18 44%	118 14%	106.4 3%	97.9 ?(14.8 - 189, n=227) -5%	365 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=273, last 2 years) 253%
Random Read 4KB	69.4	69.6 0%	46.7 -33%	73.1 5%	42 ?(3.59 - 117, n=227) -39%	142 ?(13.5 - 325, n=273, last 2 years) 105%
Random Write 4KB	17.7	30.33 71%	18.6 5%	15.8 -11%	20 ?(0.75 - 89.5, n=227) 13%	132 ?(5.5 - 330, n=273, last 2 years) 646%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	82.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	83.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	80.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	84.9 ?(Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -13%	76.4 ?(13.4 - 154, n=144, last 2 years) -7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	63.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	63.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	60.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	61.7 ?(Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178) -17%	58.6 ?(8.4 - 83.3, n=144, last 2 years) -8%

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


33.8 °C	31.8 °C	30.7 °C
33.9 °C	31.8 °C	30.9 °C
33.3 °C	31.9 °C	30.5 °C

Max: 33.9 °C
Medel: 32.1 °C


29.6 °C	32.6 °C	35.1 °C
29.6 °C	32.6 °C	35.4 °C
30.5 °C	32.3 °C	34.6 °C

Max: 35.4 °C
Medel: 32.5 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 39.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Moto E6s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi 8A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

	Motorola Moto E6s 3000 mAh	Nokia 2.3 4000 mAh	Huawei Y6s 3020 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 8A 5000 mAh	Average of class Smartphone
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3	806	919 14%	743 -8%	1145 42%	903 ?(442 - 1953, n=281, last 2 years) 12%

Batteritid


NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		13tim 26min

För

+ Aktuella säkerhetsuppdateringar vid skrivande stund

+ Bra batteritid

+ Fingeravtrycksläsare

+ Dedikerad microSD-plats

+ Stiligt hölje

+ Lätt

Emot

- Riktigt långsamt WLAN

- Långa laddningstider

- Kamera med låg kontrast

Omdöme – Billig och lätt

Recension av Motorola Moto E6s. Recensionsex från Motorola Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Motorola Moto E6s är en ganska lätt och praktisk telefon som ser tjusig ut och känns ganska välgjord tack vare färggradienten på baksidan. Kameran tar användbara bilder, som dock har låg kontrast. Men det lilla batteriet ger skaplig batteritid och prestandan är rimlig för den här prisnivån.

Man bör inte förvänta sig mirakel för 1.000 kronor, men Motorola har tillverkat en totalt sett skaplig smartphone från denna begränsade budget. En fingeravtrycksläsare är inte alltid självklart i det här prisskiktet och en dedikerad minneskortsplats är trevligt. Något annat som är positivt: även om den bara hade Android 9 i vår recension så hade den aktuella säkerhetspatchar.

Om du letar efter en lätt och billig smartphone som fortfarande har användbar batteritid kommer du klara dig bra med Motorola Moto E6s.

Vi upplevde att dess riktigt långsamma WLAN, som inte ens kunde stå sig i en jämförelse mot andra modeller i samma klass, var ett problem. Men trots det kan vi rekommendera Motorola Moto E6s åt alla som gillar lätta telefoner, så länge man bara planerar att använda enheten för mindre krävande aktiviteter.

Motorola Moto E6s - 2020-05-06 05/06/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design

76%

Tangentbord

65 / 75 → 87%

Mus

92%

Anslutningar

33 / 70 → 47%

Vikt

91%

Batteri

90%

Skärm

85%

Spelprestanda

6 / 64 → 10%

Programprestanda

54 / 86 → 63%

Temperatur

93%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

69 / 90 → 77%

Camera

40%

Medel

69%

75%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Linked Articles

Motorola Moto E6s (Moto E Serie)

Test

•

Test: Motorola Moto E7 Plus - ...

Test

•

Test: Motorola Moto E6 Plus - ...

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 202480 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!