Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Motorola Moto E6 Plus - Batteriet rockar, prestandan suger (Sammanfattning)
Översikt över enheterna
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74.9 % | 11/2019 | Motorola Moto E6 Plus Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 149.7 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.10" | 1560x720 | |
| 78.6 % | 06/2018 | Motorola Moto E5 Plus 425, Adreno 308 | 197 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.00" | 1440x720 | |
08/2019 | Motorola Moto E6 435, Adreno 505 | 159 g | 16 GB eMMC Flash | 5.50" | 1440x720 | ||
| 81.7 % | 04/2019 | LG K40 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 145 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 5.70" | 1440x720 | |
| 82.5 % | 05/2019 | Sony Xperia L3 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 156 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 5.70" | 1440x720 | |
| 73.8 % | 10/2019 | TP-Link Neffos X20 Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300 | 171 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.26" | 1520x720 | |
| 78.4 % | 10/2019 | Xiaomi Mi A3 SD 665, Adreno 610 | 173.8 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.09" | 1560x720 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 453 cd/m²
Kontrast: 3236:1 (Svärta: 0.14 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 8.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.95
| Motorola Moto E6 Plus IPS, 1560x720, 6.10 | Motorola Moto E5 Plus IPS, 1440x720, 6.00 | LG K40 IPS, 1440x720, 5.70 | Sony Xperia L3 IPS, 1440x720, 5.70 | TP-Link Neffos X20 IPS, 1520x720, 6.26 | Xiaomi Mi A3 AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -57% | -18% | 16% | -23% | 3% | |
| Brightness middle | 453 | 518 14% | 475 5% | 533 18% | 470 4% | 348 -23% |
| Brightness | 440 | 481 9% | 467 6% | 533 21% | 455 3% | 355 -19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 87 1% | 90 5% | 89 3% | 93 8% | 91 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.14 | 0.85 -507% | 0.32 -129% | 0.25 -79% | 0.41 -193% | |
| Contrast | 3236 | 609 -81% | 1484 -54% | 2132 -34% | 1146 -65% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.2 | 4.47 38% | 5.95 17% | 2.8 61% | 6 17% | 5.86 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.7 | 8.04 37% | 12.62 1% | 5.1 60% | 10.1 20% | 15.6 -23% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.4 | 5.4 36% | 7.9 6% | 1.9 77% | 6.3 25% | 3.6 57% |
| Gamma | 1.95 113% | 2.318 95% | 2.331 94% | 2.11 104% | 2.06 107% | 2.232 99% |
| CCT | 8296 78% | 7134 91% | 8202 79% | 6149 106% | 8064 81% | 7051 92% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 53.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 29.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E6 Plus | |
| LG K40 | |
| Sony Xperia L3 | |
| TP-Link Neffos X20 | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10 - 11, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E6 Plus | |
| LG K40 | |
| Sony Xperia L3 | |
| TP-Link Neffos X20 | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3.7 - 6.2, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto E6 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus | |
| LG K40 | |
| Sony Xperia L3 | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (71347 - 88242, n=9) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
| Motorola Moto E6 Plus (Chrome 77) | |
| Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (12.9 - 13.9, n=3) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
| Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) | |
| LG K40 (Chrome 74) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (26 - 30, n=7) | |
| Motorola Moto E6 Plus (Chrome 77) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
| Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) | |
| LG K40 (Chrome 74) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3312 - 4508, n=9) | |
| Motorola Moto E6 Plus (Chrome 77) | |
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus (Chrome 70) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Motorola Moto E5 Plus (Chrome 70) | |
| LG K40 (Chrome 74) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10846 - 12799, n=9) | |
| Motorola Moto E6 Plus (Chrome 77) | |
| Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto E6 Plus | Motorola Moto E5 Plus | LG K40 | Sony Xperia L3 | TP-Link Neffos X20 | Xiaomi Mi A3 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 40% | -14% | -13% | -17% | 133% | -8% | 787% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 277.7 | 248.5 -11% | 261.7 -6% | 290.9 5% | 279 0% | 502 81% | 242 ? -13% | 1505 ? 442% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 106.1 | 137.9 30% | 100.5 -5% | 87.5 -18% | 90.6 -15% | 184 73% | 100.5 ? -5% | 1112 ? 948% |
| Random Read 4KB | 61.7 | 62.7 2% | 52.6 -15% | 28.83 -53% | 39.39 -36% | 126.9 106% | 43.2 ? -30% | 247 ? 300% |
| Random Write 4KB | 17.41 | 56.1 222% | 10 -43% | 16.36 -6% | 8.65 -50% | 117.4 574% | 22.4 ? 29% | 271 ? 1457% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.5 ? | 83.9 ? 2% | 77.6 ? -6% | 80.9 ? -2% | 82.6 ? 0% | 67.8 ? -18% | 71.8 ? -13% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.3 ? | 60.7 ? -3% | 57.4 ? -8% | 61.7 ? -1% | 63 ? 1% | 50.1 ? -20% | 52.9 ? -15% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto E6 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
LG K40 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (125.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.06 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.57 / 1.69 / 1.72 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
3 / 4.88 Watt |
    
| |
| Motorola Moto E6 Plus 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto E5 Plus 5000 mAh | LG K40 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia L3 3300 mAh | TP-Link Neffos X20 4100 mAh | Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -14% | -8% | 7% | 14% | -49% | -1% | -39% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.57 | 0.9 -58% | 0.68 -19% | 0.57 -0% | 0.57 -0% | 0.8 -40% | 0.669 ? -17% | 0.897 ? -57% |
| Idle Average * | 1.69 | 1.5 11% | 1.53 9% | 1.5 11% | 1.52 10% | 2 -18% | 1.577 ? 7% | 1.452 ? 14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.72 | 2 -16% | 1.95 -13% | 1.51 12% | 1.66 3% | 3.3 -92% | 1.851 ? -8% | 1.629 ? 5% |
| Load Average * | 3 | 3.2 -7% | 3.5 -17% | 3.09 -3% | 2.34 22% | 4.1 -37% | 2.91 ? 3% | 5.55 ? -85% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.88 | 4.9 -0% | 4.9 -0% | 4.15 15% | 3.16 35% | 7.7 -58% | 4.41 ? 10% | 8.31 ? -70% |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto E6 Plus 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto E5 Plus 5000 mAh | LG K40 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia L3 3300 mAh | TP-Link Neffos X20 4100 mAh | Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 31% | -10% | -22% | -18% | 19% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 825 | 1078 31% | 745 -10% | 641 -22% | 674 -18% | 985 19% |
| Reader / Idle | 2127 | 1724 | ||||
| H.264 | 750 | 1023 | ||||
| Load | 242 | 297 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Även om Motorola Moto E6 Plus har en hygglig skärm och skaplig batteritid lämnar prestandan mycket att önska. Det sista gäller dock alla våra jämförelseenheter utom en.
Sett som en uppgradering från föregångaren än E6 Plus en blandad kompott. Även om svarta kanter inte längre hamnar runt video som på E5 Plus har Motorola utrustat E6 Plus med ett betydligt mindre batteri. Vår recensionsenhet stod sig ändå bra i batteritesterna även om den inte kunda matcha den uthållighet som E5 Plus eller Xiaomi Mi A3 klarade av.
Motorola Moto E6 Plus har många positiva egenskaper, men prestandan är för svag för att vi ska kunna rekommendera den med gott samvete.
4 GB-varianten, som kommer med ytterligare 2 GB RAM, kan tänkas lösa en del av de problem vår recensionsenhet led av. Men den kommer inte göra MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 mer kraftfull, så vi rekommenderar istället att du tar en titt på Xiaomi Mi A3 om du är intresserad av en billig mittenskiktstelefon.
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
-
10/30/2019 v7
Inge Schwabe
Pricecompare
