Notebookcheck

Test: Medion Erazer X6805 (Core i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Tanja Hinum-Balaz (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 01/09/2019

Riktigt prisvärd Medans bärbara speldatorer blir allt dyrare och många tillverkare försöker överträffa varandra med nya höga priser så fortsätter Medion att leverera prisvärda modeller. Läs vidare för att få reda på hur Erazer X6805 presterar jämfört med andra billiga bärbara speldatorer.

Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Kärna: 1405 MHz, Minne: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 388.73, Optimus
Minne
16384 MB 
, 2 x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dubbla kanaler, alla platser upptagna, upp till 32 GB
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, Full-HD, 60 Hz, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel HM370
Hårddisk
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, NVMe SSD + Seagate Barracuda ST1000LM048, 1 TB HDD, 5400 RPM. 2 x M.2 2280 & 1 x 2.5-tums enhetsplats NVMe SSD + Seagate Barracuda ST1000LM048, 1 TB HDD, 5400 RPM. 2 x M.2 2280 & 1 x 2.5-tums enhetsplats
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 1 x hörlursanslutning, 1 x mikrofonanslutning, Kortläsare: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Nätverk
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 33 x 385 x 265
Batteri
46.7 Wh, 4100 mAh Litiumjon, 3 celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: FHD
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.1 (Dolby Atmos), Tangentbord: Mekaniskt, RGB, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 180 W, garantibroschyr, säkerhetsinstruktioner, Control Center, CyberLink PowerRecover, McAfee Security (Testversion), Life App Explorer, Steam, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.548 kg, Strömförsörjning: 416 g
Pris
1400 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

Vänster sida: RJ45-LAN, USB Typ A 2.0, Mikrofonanslutning, Hörlursanslutning
Vänster sida: RJ45-LAN, USB Typ A 2.0, Mikrofonanslutning, Hörlursanslutning
Höger sida: 2x USB Typ A 3.0, kortläsare
Höger sida: 2x USB Typ A 3.0, kortläsare
Baksidan: Kensington-lås, 2 x Mini DisplayPort, HDMI, USB Typ C 3.0, Nätadapter
Baksidan: Kensington-lås, 2 x Mini DisplayPort, HDMI, USB Typ C 3.0, Nätadapter
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=205)
90.1 MB/s ∼100% +374%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼89% +321%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼87% +311%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s ∼30% +42%
Dell G7 15-7588
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
22.53 MB/s ∼25% +19%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19 MB/s ∼21%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=203)
109 MB/s ∼100% +230%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼80% +164%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼79% +161%
Dell G7 15-7588
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
34.51 MB/s ∼32% +5%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33 MB/s ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28 MB/s ∼26% -15%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s ∼98%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
663 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
660 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
659 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=182)
595 MBit/s ∼86% -12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
660 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
643 MBit/s ∼97% 0%
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
642 MBit/s ∼97% 0%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
642 MBit/s ∼97%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
632 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 721, n=182)
535 MBit/s ∼81% -17%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
363 MBit/s ∼55% -43%
246
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
269
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 287 cd/m² Medel: 269.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 270 cd/m²
Kontrast: 844:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 3.25
ΔE Greyscale 4.16 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
82% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.53
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE0747), IPS, 1920x1080
Dell G7 15-7588
LG Philips LGD053F, IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6 (LGD0590), IPS, 1920x1080
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
BOE07A1, IPS, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
B156HAN02.1, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-25%
4%
13%
-44%
-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.4 (18.8, 19.6)
53.2 (26.4, 26.8)
-39%
38.8 (16, 22.8)
-1%
38 (19.2, 18.8)
1%
47.2 (23.6, 23.6)
-23%
43.6 (19.2, 24.4)
-14%
Response Time Black / White *
29.2 (16.8, 12.4)
41.6 (23.6, 18)
-42%
26.8 (14.4, 12.4)
8%
22 (12, 10)
25%
32.4 (18, 14.4)
-11%
32.4 (18, 14.4)
-11%
PWM Frequency
20490 (99)
21550 (99)
5%
200 (99)
-99%
Screen
12%
-41%
4%
-1%
-19%
Brightness middle
270
283
5%
250.9
-7%
252
-7%
275
2%
282.8
5%
Brightness
269
269
0%
246
-9%
237
-12%
254
-6%
264
-2%
Brightness Distribution
86
87
1%
89
3%
86
0%
90
5%
88
2%
Black Level *
0.32
0.23
28%
0.34
-6%
0.21
34%
0.27
16%
0.42
-31%
Contrast
844
1230
46%
738
-13%
1200
42%
1019
21%
673
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.1
4.68
8%
7.34
-44%
4.42
13%
4.62
9%
4.93
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.25
8
14%
28.66
-210%
7.21
22%
8.05
13%
17.65
-91%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.25
2.5
23%
4.42
-36%
3.08
5%
3.59
-10%
4.07
-25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.16
4.32
-4%
6.8
-63%
3.74
10%
4.31
-4%
3.8
9%
Gamma
2.53 87%
2.36 93%
2.164 102%
2.34 94%
2.49 88%
2.449 90%
CCT
6860 95%
7612 85%
6780 96%
7291 89%
7000 93%
6112 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
57
6%
36
-33%
38
-30%
38
-30%
36
-33%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
82
87
6%
56
-32%
59
-28%
59
-28%
57
-30%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-7% / 4%
-19% / -34%
9% / 6%
-23% / -10%
-16% / -18%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.8 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 20490 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 20490 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 20490 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9173 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
Mjukvara
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Core i7-8750H
177 Points ∼100% +4%
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼99% +3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points ∼98% +1%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Core i5-8300H
171 Points ∼97% 0%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points ∼97%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 209, n=423)
152 Points ∼86% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
138 Points ∼78% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Intel Core i7-8750H
1196 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Core i7-8750H
1090 Points ∼91% -9%
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Core i7-8750H
1079 Points ∼90% -10%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Core i5-8300H
818 Points ∼68% -32%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
805 Points ∼67% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1865, n=424)
751 Points ∼63% -37%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
516 Points ∼43% -57%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points ∼100% +2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points ∼100% +2%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.95 Points ∼98%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.94 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=408)
1.68 Points ∼84% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.56 Points ∼78% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Intel Core i7-8750H
13.24 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.98 Points ∼98% -2%
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.08 Points ∼91% -9%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
8.68 Points ∼66% -34%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.2, n=509)
7.28 Points ∼55% -45%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.93 Points ∼45% -55%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.95 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
13.24 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1196 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
5285 Points ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5234 Points ∼99%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
5001 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6959, n=122)
4944 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4812 Points ∼91% -8%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4707 Points ∼89% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
4197 Points ∼79% -20%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
5410 Points ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5379 Points ∼99%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
5370 Points ∼99% 0%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
5369 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
5362 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=317)
4931 Points ∼91% -8%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
4912 Points ∼91% -9%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4404 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
4371 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=335)
4222 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4129 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4109 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
3968 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
3910 Points ∼89% -11%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4404 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5379 poäng
Hjälp
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
Dell G7 15-7588
SK hynix SC311 SATA
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
AS SSD
-51%
-69%
-32%
-56%
-60%
Score Total
3113
834
-73%
528
-83%
1643
-47%
670
-78%
838
-73%
Score Write
762
302
-60%
181
-76%
661
-13%
195
-74%
128
-83%
Score Read
1565
343
-78%
233
-85%
670
-57%
343
-78%
497
-68%
4K Write
100.94
104.05
3%
59.82
-41%
94.53
-6%
79.31
-21%
35.74
-65%
4K Read
44.29
38.11
-14%
23.66
-47%
32.38
-27%
31.48
-29%
38.71
-13%
Seq Write
1262.47
450.12
-64%
220.29
-83%
554.03
-56%
123.53
-90%
131.64
-90%
Seq Read
1652.94
501.5
-70%
505.64
-69%
1320.51
-20%
1237.74
-25%
1230.64
-26%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3389 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1265 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 352.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 302.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 777.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1095 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 38.98 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 90.33 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11903 Points ∼100% +2%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11662 Points ∼98%
Dell G7 15-7588
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
11309 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=451)
10264 Points ∼86% -12%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
7740 Points ∼65% -34%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
7682 Points ∼65% -34%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
7576 Points ∼64% -35%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15322 Points ∼100% +5%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14557 Points ∼95%
Dell G7 15-7588
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
14487 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=524)
11902 Points ∼78% -18%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
9909 Points ∼65% -32%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
9266 Points ∼60% -36%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
9203 Points ∼60% -37%
3DMark 11 Performance
13648 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
33333 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10351 poäng
Hjälp
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=226)
44.4 fps ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
40.3 fps ∼91% +2%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
39.5 fps ∼89%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
37 fps ∼83% -6%
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
37 fps ∼83% -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
26 fps ∼59% -34%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
24.2 fps ∼55% -39%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 184, n=190)
74.8 fps ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
72.8 fps ∼97% +1%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
72.1 fps ∼96%
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
62 fps ∼83% -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
46.4 fps ∼62% -36%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
44.2 fps ∼59% -39%
låg med. hög ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 72.139.5fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 93.881.3fps
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) 85.278.7fps
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 94.568.2fps
The Crew 2 (2018) 6059.9fps
Monster Hunter World (2018) 56.544.9fps
F1 2018 (2018) 9760fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 5649fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
29 / 32 / 35 dB(A)
Hårddisk
32 dB(A)
Hög belastning
45 / 56 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-3%
6%
3%
-1%
12%
2%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
28.1
3%
30
-3%
29
-0%
28
3%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=229)
-1%
Idle Minimum *
29
30
-3%
29
-0%
30
-3%
29
-0%
28
3%
31.5 (28 - 41.7, n=652)
-9%
Idle Average *
32
34
-6%
29
9%
32
-0%
33
-3%
28
12%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=652)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
35
38
-9%
29.2
17%
33
6%
41
-17%
28.5
19%
34.7 (28 - 50.4, n=652)
1%
Load Average *
45
44
2%
40.6
10%
42
7%
44
2%
34.9
22%
40.4 (30.3 - 58, n=653)
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
47
50
-6%
49.8
-6%
46
2%
47
-0%
40
15%
Load Maximum *
56
55
2%
49.8
11%
49
12%
49
12%
49.6
11%
47.6 (38.9 - 64, n=653)
15%

* ... smaller is better

 40 °C43 °C35 °C 
 36 °C42 °C32 °C 
 26 °C28 °C28 °C 
Max: 43 °C
Medel: 34.4 °C
43 °C46 °C47 °C
48 °C55 °C38 °C
28 °C29 °C25 °C
Max: 55 °C
Medel: 39.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  53 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 41.6 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-3.3 °C / -5.9 F).
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-6%
5%
-14%
-17%
-10%
-3%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
46
-7%
48.6
-13%
52
-21%
51
-19%
42.8
-0%
45.5 (28 - 68.8, n=617)
-6%
Maximum Bottom *
55
52
5%
51.4
7%
55
-0%
58
-5%
52
5%
49.1 (25.9 - 78, n=615)
11%
Idle Upper Side *
28
32
-14%
24
14%
36
-29%
35
-25%
32
-14%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=568)
-10%
Idle Bottom *
30
32
-7%
26.8
11%
32
-7%
35
-17%
39.4
-31%
31.5 (21.1 - 50.3, n=566)
-5%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.243.92535.139.73129.130.9403637.4502928.56326.427.88025.638.610025.541.312523.340.916022.35320022.560.725021.165.131519.865.740018.966.750018.569.363017.575.180017.175.4100017.570125017.665.6160017.473.2200016.868.9250017.464.7315017.369.7400017.167.6500017.367.8630017.364.1800017.258.21000017.363.31250017.167.31600017.258.7SPL29.781.7N1.354.2median 17.4median 65.7Delta1.84.938.540.733.834.127.629.633.736.725.932.32536.72543.42947.526.150.62358.223.161.920.968.120.271.718.675.318.17817.980.619.478.720.177.61877.71773.917.579.817.177.617.474.717.372.317.271.91773.116.970.616.965.316.963.616.857.73088.21.479.2median 17.9median 72.31.97.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMedion Erazer X6805-MD61085Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.7 / 2.1 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 10 / 13 / 21 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 101 / 176 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
13%
29%
33%
6%
27%
-48%
Idle Minimum *
10
10
-0%
5.5
45%
5
50%
12
-20%
4.5
55%
20.1 (3.9 - 113, n=612)
-101%
Idle Average *
13
13
-0%
7.6
42%
7
46%
14
-8%
10
23%
25.6 (6.8 - 119, n=612)
-97%
Idle Maximum *
21
19
10%
9
57%
11
48%
18
14%
13.8
34%
30.7 (8.3 - 122, n=612)
-46%
Load Average *
101
68
33%
94
7%
91
10%
92
9%
92.5
8%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=603)
-3%
Load Maximum *
176
136
23%
154.4
12%
137
22%
142
19%
123.2
30%
166 (21.9 - 590, n=602)
6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
126
110
13%
116.3
8%
97
23%
100
21%
108.1
14%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
8tim 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4tim 30min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 38min
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, 46.7 Wh
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, 55 Wh
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, 56 Wh
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, 48 Wh
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, 70 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, 52.5 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-13%
44%
32%
41%
-9%
-20%
Reader / Idle
503
386
-23%
656
30%
752
50%
626
24%
333 (39 - 1174, n=600)
-34%
WiFi v1.3
270
275
2%
452
67%
418
55%
514
90%
245
-9%
251 (78 - 622, n=275)
-7%
Load
98
80
-18%
132
35%
90
-8%
106
8%
78.5 (18 - 202, n=566)
-20%
H.264
265
428
506
244 (88 - 506, n=124)

För

+ hölje som ser lyxigt ut
+ robust
+ handledsstödet håller sig alltid svalt
+ skapligt prisvärd
+ mekaniskt tangentbord
+ bra högtalare
+ RGB-belysning
+ snabbt WiFi
+ NVMe SSD

Emot

- har inte Thunderbolt 3 eller USB 3.1 Gen 2
- höljet drar åt sig fingeravtryck
- batteriet kunde varit större
- begränsade fläktkontroller
- komplicerad att plocka isär
- långsam SD-kortläsare
Recension av Medion Erazer X6805. Recensionsex från Medion Germany.
Recension av Medion Erazer X6805. Recensionsex från Medion Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Medion Erazer X6805 är riktigt prisvärd. De flesta billiga bärbara speldatorerna kommer med en Core i5-8300H CPU, ett GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, 8 GB RAM och en SSD-enhet på 128 GB. Medion har gått ytterligare ett steg och beväpnat sin X6805 med en Core i7-8750H CPU, en GeForce GTX 1060 GPU, 16 GB RAM och en PCIe SSD-enhet på 256 GB.

Att den har ett mekaniskt tangentbord är ett ovanligt men smart drag för det här priset. Vidare bör RGB-belysningen och det robusta höljet tilltala gamers. Högtalare och portutbud är dessutom skapliga, även om vi gärna hade sett Thunderbolt 3 eller åtminstone en USB 3.1 Gen 2-port.

Medion Erazer X6805 är en kraftfull och väldesignad budgetlaptop för spel som inte hålls tillbaka av sina tillkortakommanden.

Medion kunde också ha utrustat X6805 med en snabbare SD-kortläsare och justerat den förinställda fläktkurvan. Vidare kunde enheten dragit nytta av ett större batteri som ett alternativ istället för en HDD-enhet. Trots detta rekommenderar vi Medion Erazer X6805 helhjärtat då det är en av de bästa billiga bärbara speldatorerna som finns att få tag på.

Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 - 09/28/2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Design
80 / 98 → 82%
Tangentbord
89%
Mus
78%
Anslutningar
61 / 81 → 75%
Vikt
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Batteri
78%
Skärm
85%
Spelprestanda
94%
Programprestanda
96%
Temperatur
84 / 95 → 89%
Ljudnivå
65 / 90 → 72%
Audio
78%
Medel
79%
85%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Medion Erazer X6805 (Core i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Florian Glaser, 2019-01- 9 (Update: 2019-01- 9)