Notebookcheck

Test: MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS - Visuellt nedtonad, akustiskt slående (Sammanfattning)

Extrem makeover. GS65 hade på många sätt svårt att stå sig mot sina konkurrenter, men nu presenterar MSI en fullständigt uppdaterad efterföljare i form av GS66. I vår detaljerade recension får du reda på vad som har blivit bättre.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS (GS66 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-10980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q - 8192 MB, Kärna: 930 MHz, Minne: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 445.87, Optimus
Minne
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dubbla kanaler, Alla platser upptagna, max. 64 GB
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, Full-HD, G-Sync, glansig: nej, 300 Hz
Moderkort
Intel HM470
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB 
, NVMe, Platser: 2x M.2 Typ 2280
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Comet Point PCH - cAVS
Anslutningar
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning
Nätverk
Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 20 x 358 x 248
Batteri
99.99 Wh, 6578 mAh Litiumpolymer, 4 celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD (720p)
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.0 Dynaudio, Tangentbord: Chiclet RGB SteelSeries, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 230 Watt, Snabbstartsguide, Dragon Center, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.167 kg, Strömförsörjning: 732 g
Pris
2849 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83 %
05/2020
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.2 kg20 mm15.6"1920x1080
84 %
08/2019
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg18 mm15.6"1920x1080
84 %
05/2019
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg19 mm15.6"1920x1080
82 %
09/2019
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.4 kg19.8 mm15.6"1920x1080
83 %
12/2019
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg22 mm15.6"1920x1080

Storleksjämförelse

362.2 mm 261.6 mm 19.8 mm 2.4 kg359 mm 243 mm 22 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 248 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg
Vänster: Ström, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI, USB-A 3.1 Gen2
Vänster: Ström, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI, USB-A 3.1 Gen2
Höger: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, USB-C 3.1 Gen2, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen2, RJ45-LAN
Höger: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, USB-C 3.1 Gen2, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen2, RJ45-LAN
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1360 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1320 MBit/s ∼97%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1670, n=348)
729 MBit/s ∼54% -45%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s ∼51% -47%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
694 MBit/s ∼51% -47%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
688 MBit/s ∼51% -48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1330 MBit/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1140 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=348)
675 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
654 MBit/s ∼49% -51%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
554 MBit/s ∼42% -58%
ColorChecker
13.3 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS: 14.2 ∆E min: 1.18 - max: 22.63 ∆E
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
298
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 323 cd/m² Medel: 310.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 316 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1505:1 (Svärta: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.03 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
23%
-13%
-11%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14 (6.8, 7.2)
5.2 (2.6, 2.6)
63%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-9%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-9%
9.6 (4.8, 4.8)
31%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-17%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-17%
10.8 (6, 4.8)
-13%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-25%
PWM Frequency
23580 (24)
Screen
-7%
-8%
-34%
-12%
Brightness middle
316
288
-9%
266
-16%
324.8
3%
313
-1%
Brightness
311
265
-15%
248
-20%
316
2%
295
-5%
Brightness Distribution
92
84
-9%
89
-3%
84
-9%
89
-3%
Black Level *
0.21
0.22
-5%
0.31
-48%
0.26
-24%
0.3
-43%
Contrast
1505
1309
-13%
858
-43%
1249
-17%
1043
-31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.03
3.22
-6%
2.78
8%
4.96
-64%
3.33
-10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.32
6.26
14%
5.96
19%
8.95
-22%
6.25
15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.1
1.5
-36%
0.91
17%
3.23
-194%
1.77
-61%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.9
3.43
12%
3.58
8%
5
-28%
3.1
21%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.21 100%
2.51 88%
CCT
7439 87%
7290 89%
7186 90%
7742 84%
6930 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
65
60
-8%
62
-5%
59.8
-8%
59
-9%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
93
-7%
96
-4%
91.8
-8%
90
-10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
8% / -3%
-11% / -9%
-23% / -30%
-5% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 7.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17612 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640Tooltip
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1541 (1518.31-1635.12)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø968 (959.49-1081.9)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1002 (974.71-1181)
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
477 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
457 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 511, n=122)
449 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
442 Points ∼93% -7%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
434 Points ∼91% -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points ∼90% -10%
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3713 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 6321, n=123)
2968 Points ∼80% -20%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
2448 Points ∼66% -34%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
2427 Points ∼65% -35%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
2384 Points ∼64% -36%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
2298 Points ∼62% -38%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
201 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
192 Points ∼96% -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
189 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
181 Points ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 219, n=611)
161 Points ∼80% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1635 (1518.31min - 1635.12max) Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points ∼73% -27%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
1181 Points ∼72% -28%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points ∼68% -32%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
1057 Points ∼65% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=615)
917 Points ∼56% -44%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 901, n=76)
388 Seconds * ∼100% -32%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
295 Seconds * ∼76%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
43786 MIPS ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (3034 - 75612, n=77)
37005 MIPS ∼85% -15%
7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5227 MIPS ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (2480 - 5674, n=77)
4876 MIPS ∼93% -7%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
7634 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (3448 - 10190, n=60)
6602 Points ∼86% -14%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1283 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (874 - 1401, n=60)
1217 Points ∼95% -5%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
12.2 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.7 - 18.9, n=76)
10.1 fps ∼83% -17%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 95.8, n=53)
57.1 s ∼100% +9%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
52.4 s ∼92%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.546 - 0.761, n=57)
0.613 sec * ∼100% -4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.592 sec * ∼97%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1635 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
131 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
201 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6490 Points ∼100%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
5991 Points ∼92% -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5746 Points ∼89% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼88% -12%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
5522 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=294)
5324 Points ∼82% -18%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1916 μs * ∼100%

* ... smaller is better

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-4%
-4%
2%
-12%
Write 4K
131.3
108.8
-17%
115.5
-12%
137.4
5%
108.7
-17%
Read 4K
45.84
40.31
-12%
57.97
26%
41.37
-10%
41.4
-10%
Write Seq
2370
2488
5%
1555
-34%
2500
5%
1083
-54%
Read Seq
1509
1916
27%
2590
72%
1576
4%
917.2
-39%
Write 4K Q32T1
481.5
382.4
-21%
369.3
-23%
446.7
-7%
468.5
-3%
Read 4K Q32T1
559.6
421.8
-25%
441.7
-21%
522.4
-7%
529.6
-5%
Write Seq Q32T1
2392
2542
6%
1547
-35%
2796
17%
3057
28%
Read Seq Q32T1
3232
3320
3%
2969
-8%
3415
6%
3422
6%
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3232 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2392 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 559.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 481.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1509 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2370 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.84 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 131.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
21934 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
45202 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17312 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
7272 poäng
Hjälp
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø71.1 (67-75)
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
4280 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (1097 - 6005, n=104)
4121 Points ∼96% -4%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3738 Points ∼87% -13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3721 Points ∼87% -13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3719 Points ∼87% -13%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3717 Points ∼87% -13%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7084 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6748 Points ∼95% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6716 Points ∼95% -5%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6419 Points ∼91% -9%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6387 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=244)
5979 Points ∼84% -16%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
18992 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18060 Points ∼95% -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17419 Points ∼92% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17335 Points ∼91% -9%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16483 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=630)
12174 Points ∼64% -36%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
25135 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22749 Points ∼91% -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22005 Points ∼88% -12%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21861 Points ∼87% -13%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18434 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=708)
14640 Points ∼58% -42%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
70.5 (55min) fps ∼100%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
69 fps ∼98% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
64.4 (54min) fps ∼91% -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
64.1 fps ∼91% -9%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
60.4 (49min) fps ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=404)
53.3 fps ∼76% -24%
låg med. hög ultra
GTA V (2015) 182 174 153 83.4 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 131 70.5 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 153 138 128 120 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 113 97.4 82.3 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 102 91 fps
Battlefield V (2018) 121 113 fps
Apex Legends (2019) 140 139 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 76.3 58.9 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 196 190 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 88.2 80.7 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 95 88.8 fps
Escape from Tarkov (2020) 121 119 fps
Hunt Showdown (2020) 91.6 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 141 137 fps
Gears Tactics (2020) 116 90.6 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.334.534.93433.635.42539.84339.637.239.140.43134.831.631.43033.233.24037.231.534.531.432.336.65031.130.829.528.52931.56332.73026.826.926.933.48029.627.725.125.825.130.110030.525.225.724.425.132.812530.125.725.724.826.23016030.227.626.524.126.830.520028.424.323.322.223.629.425030.723.52824.121.931.731535.225.72522.420.53540039.430.921.321.32036.750037.825.320.520.318.336.963037.6252020.11837.880040.126.629.824.717.839.410004026.623.120.517.44012504031.419.920.719.640.5160043.428.919.819.61843.520004428.421.418.917.844.3250044.727.519.618.917.945.4315042.726.918.918.417.842.3400041.124.318.518.617.940.650004022.818.518.418.139.6630039.521.818.218.217.938.9800037.620.6181817.9371000036.518.918.11817.935.61250035.118.318.517.917.9341600030.317.918.117.917.829.1SPL53.438.933.83230.553.4N8.9321.71.48.8median 37.8median 25.3median 20median 20.1median 18median 37Delta3.12.23.52.62.13.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
32 / 34 / 39 dB(A)
Hög belastning
53 / 53 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Noise
4%
0%
8%
1%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
29
3%
31
-3%
Idle Minimum *
32
30
6%
31
3%
30.5
5%
31
3%
Idle Average *
34
33
3%
34
-0%
31.5
7%
34
-0%
Idle Maximum *
39
39
-0%
39
-0%
31.5
19%
37
5%
Load Average *
53
45
15%
46
13%
40.6
23%
47
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
49
-2%
53
-10%
49.5
-3%
50
-4%
Load Maximum *
53
51
4%
55
-4%
53.4
-1%
54
-2%

* ... smaller is better

 48 °C53 °C53 °C 
 44 °C45 °C42 °C 
 34 °C36 °C30 °C 
Max: 53 °C
Medel: 42.8 °C
52 °C55 °C48 °C
50 °C53 °C45 °C
37 °C38 °C35 °C
Max: 55 °C
Medel: 45.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  45 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 42.6 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-8.2 °C / -14.8 F).
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Heat
0%
-10%
-24%
-13%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
49
8%
58
-9%
48.8
8%
60
-13%
Maximum Bottom *
55
59
-7%
64
-16%
55
-0%
66
-20%
Idle Upper Side *
28
28
-0%
30
-7%
41
-46%
30
-7%
Idle Bottom *
29
29
-0%
31
-7%
45.6
-57%
32
-10%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.636.32539.142.83133.236.54032.339.9502936.56326.9378025.136.210025.136.712526.240.416026.844.220023.644.325021.953.931520.557.94002069.450018.378.86301883.480017.886.1100017.482.6125019.680.716001881.2200017.879.9250017.976.7315017.873.7400017.972.1500018.170.5630017.969.5800017.971.61000017.962.51250017.955.71600017.849.8SPL30.591.1N1.483.5median 18median 70.5Delta2.112.831.734.233.7373032.936.637.134.23527.634.32833.424.63823.847.123.952.821.550.722.160.321.664.420.56719.5621868.217.970.518.369.720.869.618.769.717.469.917.769.317.668.517.267.417.464.117.363.217.364.417.162.217.258.517.254.430.5801.448.9median 18median 64.41.76.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GS66 Stealth 10SFSAcer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 1.4 / 1.8 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 13 / 16 / 27 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 109 / 236 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Power Consumption
24%
-17%
-109%
15%
Idle Minimum *
13
7
46%
21
-62%
46
-254%
11
15%
Idle Average *
16
12
25%
23
-44%
59
-269%
15
6%
Idle Maximum *
27
22
19%
32
-19%
65.5
-143%
21
22%
Load Average *
109
86
21%
97
11%
99.8
8%
94
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
155
144
7%
148
5%
154.1
1%
143
8%
Load Maximum *
236
177
25%
213
10%
222.7
6%
173
27%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
8tim 25min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6tim 04min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 42min
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q,  Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
19%
34%
-48%
-14%
-26%
Reader / Idle
505
666
32%
545
8%
221
-56%
439
-13%
362 (39 - 1174, n=728)
-28%
WiFi v1.3
364
478
31%
421
16%
129
-65%
340
-7%
267 (62 - 622, n=444)
-27%
Load
102
96
-6%
181
77%
80
-22%
79
-23%
79.8 (18 - 243, n=697)
-22%
H.264
408
271 (88 - 651, n=167)

För

+ Fler servicemöjligheter än föregångaren
+ Höljet är mycket robustare
+ Skärmlocket har en större öppningsvinkel
+ Moderna USB-anslutningar (inklusive TB3)
+ Kraftfullt batteri
+ Elegant design
+ 300 Hz-skärm

Emot

- CPU:n passar inte bra ihop med det bärbara konceptet / kylsystemet
- Irriterande fläktar (Varvar upp, egenheter, ljudnivå)
- Tangentbordet tar tid att vänja sig vid
- Ingen kortläsare
- Mediokert ljud
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS, recensionsex från MSI Germany
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS, recensionsex från MSI Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

GS66 är ett tydligt steg framåt jämfört med GS65.

MSI har tagit hand om de viktigaste klagomålen och ger bättre stabilitet och fler servicemöjligheter till det kompakta höljet. GS66 förtjänar också beröm för moderna anslutningar (Thunderbolt 3), en snabb och kontrastrik 300 Hz-skärm samt ett stort batteri, även om det inte riktigt lyckades leva upp till sin potential.

Vi förstår däremot inte riktigt valet av processor. Core i9-10980HK är förstås väldigt lockande från ett marknadsföringsperspektiv och i fråga om prestanda, men då man som kund snarare får leva med nackdelarna (väldigt höga temperaturer och hög ljudnivå) istället för fördelarna (högre prestandapotential) känns det inte som att man som leverantör borde erbjuda det alternativet till en laptop som är designad för mobilitet.

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS - 05/17/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Design
78 / 98 → 80%
Tangentbord
77%
Mus
86%
Anslutningar
62 / 80 → 78%
Vikt
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Batteri
69 / 95 → 73%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
93%
Programprestanda
93%
Temperatur
78 / 95 → 82%
Ljudnivå
59 / 90 → 66%
Audio
74%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Medel
74%
83%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS - Visuellt nedtonad, akustiskt slående (Sammanfattning)
Florian Glaser, 2020-05-11 (Update: 2020-05-11)