Notebookcheck Logo

Test: MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS - Visuellt nedtonad, akustiskt slående (Sammanfattning)

Extrem makeover. GS65 hade på många sätt svårt att stå sig mot sina konkurrenter, men nu presenterar MSI en fullständigt uppdaterad efterföljare i form av GS66. I vår detaljerade recension får du reda på vad som har blivit bättre.
Comet Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook MSI
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS (GS66 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-10980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 930 MHz, Minne: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 445.87, Optimus
Minne
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dubbla kanaler, Alla platser upptagna, max. 64 GB
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, Full-HD, G-Sync, glansig: nej, 300 Hz
Moderkort
Intel HM470
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB 
, NVMe, Platser: 2x M.2 Typ 2280
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Comet Point PCH - cAVS
Anslutningar
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning
Nätverk
Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 20 x 358 x 248
Batteri
99.99 Wh, 6578 mAh Litiumpolymer, 4 celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD (720p)
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.0 Dynaudio, Tangentbord: Chiclet RGB SteelSeries, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 230 Watt, Snabbstartsguide, Dragon Center, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.167 kg, Strömförsörjning: 732 g
Pris
2849 EUR
Länkar
MSI hemsida
MSI kategori
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82.8 %
05/2020
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		2.2 kg20 mm15.60"1920x1080
84 %
08/2019
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.1 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080
84 %
05/2019
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.1 kg19 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.3 %
09/2019
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.4 kg19.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.8 %
12/2019
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.1 kg22 mm15.60"1920x1080

Storleksjämförelse

❌
362.2 mm 261.6 mm 19.8 mm 2.4 kg359 mm 243 mm 22 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 248 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Vänster: Ström, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI, USB-A 3.1 Gen2
Vänster: Ström, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI, USB-A 3.1 Gen2
Höger: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, USB-C 3.1 Gen2, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen2, RJ45-LAN
Höger: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, USB-C 3.1 Gen2, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen2, RJ45-LAN
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1330 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1140 MBit/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)
1139 MBit/s -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s -49%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
654 MBit/s -51%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
554 MBit/s -58%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1360 MBit/s +3%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1320 MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s -47%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
694 MBit/s -47%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
688 MBit/s -48%
ColorChecker
13.3 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS: 14.2 ∆E min: 1.18 - max: 22.63 ∆E
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
298
cd/m²		308
cd/m²		306
cd/m²
314
cd/m²		316
cd/m²		323
cd/m²
303
cd/m²		307
cd/m²		320
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 323 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 310.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 316 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1505:1 (Svärta: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.60		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
-7%
-5%
-6%
-8%
Display P3 Coverage
69.5
64.6
-7%
65.3
-6%
66.2
-5%
64
-8%
sRGB Coverage
99.6
92.6
-7%
95.5
-4%
92.3
-7%
90.3
-9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.8
66
-7%
66.5
-6%
67.2
-5%
65.4
-8%
Response Times
23%
-13%
-11%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14 ?(6.8, 7.2)
5.2 ?(2.6, 2.6)
63%
15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)
-9%
15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)
-9%
9.6 ?(4.8, 4.8)
31%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
-17%
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
-17%
10.8 ?(6, 4.8)
-13%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-25%
PWM Frequency
23580 ?(24)
Screen
-7%
-8%
-34%
-12%
Brightness middle
316
288
-9%
266
-16%
324.8
3%
313
-1%
Brightness
311
265
-15%
248
-20%
316
2%
295
-5%
Brightness Distribution
92
84
-9%
89
-3%
84
-9%
89
-3%
Black Level *
0.21
0.22
-5%
0.31
-48%
0.26
-24%
0.3
-43%
Contrast
1505
1309
-13%
858
-43%
1249
-17%
1043
-31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.03
3.22
-6%
2.78
8%
4.96
-64%
3.33
-10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.32
6.26
14%
5.96
19%
8.95
-22%
6.25
15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.1
1.5
-36%
0.91
17%
3.23
-194%
1.77
-61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.9
3.43
12%
3.58
8%
5
-28%
3.1
21%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.21 100%
2.51 88%
CCT
7439 87%
7290 89%
7186 90%
7742 84%
6930 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
65
60
-8%
62
-5%
59.8
-8%
59
-9%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
93
-7%
96
-4%
91.8
-8%
90
-10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / -4%
-9% / -8%
-17% / -26%
-6% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 7.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
 
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1541 (1518.31-1635.12)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø968 (959.49-1081.9)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1002 (974.71-1181)
Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)
698 Points +46%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
477 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
457 Points -4%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
442 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
434 Points -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points -10%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)
7419 Points +100%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3713 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
2448 Points -34%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
2427 Points -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
2384 Points -36%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
2298 Points -38%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points +33%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
201 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
192 Points -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
189 Points -6%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
181 Points -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3089 Points +89%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1635 (1518.31min - 1635.12max) Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
1181 Points -28%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points -32%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
1057 Points -35%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
295 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)
199.8 Seconds * +32%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)
6122 MIPS +17%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5227 MIPS
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)
76978 MIPS +76%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
43786 MIPS
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=231, last 2 years)
1808 Points +41%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1283 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)
13567 Points +78%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
7634 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)
21.2 fps +74%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
12.2 fps
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
52.4 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)
49.2 s * +6%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.592 sec *
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)
0.4699 sec * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1635 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
131 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
201 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7580 Points +17%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6490 Points
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
5991 Points -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5746 Points -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
5522 Points -15%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1916 μs *

* ... smaller is better

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G		Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-4%
-4%
2%
-12%
Write 4K
131.3
108.8
-17%
115.5
-12%
137.4
5%
108.7
-17%
Read 4K
45.84
40.31
-12%
58
27%
41.37
-10%
41.4
-10%
Write Seq
2370
2488
5%
1555
-34%
2500
5%
1083
-54%
Read Seq
1509
1916
27%
2590
72%
1576
4%
917
-39%
Write 4K Q32T1
481.5
382.4
-21%
369.3
-23%
446.7
-7%
468.5
-3%
Read 4K Q32T1
560
421.8
-25%
441.7
-21%
522
-7%
530
-5%
Write Seq Q32T1
2392
2542
6%
1547
-35%
2796
17%
3057
28%
Read Seq Q32T1
3232
3320
3%
2969
-8%
3415
6%
3422
6%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3232 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2392 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 560 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 481.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1509 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2370 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.84 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 131.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
21934 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
45202 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17312 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
7272 poäng
Hjälp
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø71.1 (67-75)
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=234, last 2 years)
29442 Points +55%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
18992 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18060 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17419 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17335 Points -9%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16483 Points -13%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=232, last 2 years)
12060 Points +70%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7084 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6748 Points -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6716 Points -5%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6419 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6387 Points -10%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (280 - 14457, n=154, last 2 years)
7720 Points +80%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
4280 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3738 Points -13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3721 Points -13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3719 Points -13%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3717 Points -13%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=230, last 2 years)
40451 Points +61%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
25135 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22749 Points -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22005 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21861 Points -13%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18434 Points -27%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years)
116.8 fps +66%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
70.5 (55min) fps
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
69 fps -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
64.4 (54min) fps -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
64.1 fps -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
60.4 (49min) fps -14%
låg med. hög ultra
GTA V (2015) 182 174 153 83.4
The Witcher 3 (2015) 131 70.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 153 138 128 120
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 113 97.4 82.3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 102 91
Battlefield V (2018) 121 113
Apex Legends (2019) 140 139
Borderlands 3 (2019) 76.3 58.9
FIFA 20 (2019) 196 190
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 88.2 80.7
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 95 88.8
Escape from Tarkov (2020) 121 119
Hunt Showdown (2020) 91.6
Doom Eternal (2020) 141 137
Gears Tactics (2020) 116 90.6
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.334.534.93433.635.42539.84339.637.239.140.43134.831.631.43033.233.24037.231.534.531.432.336.65031.130.829.528.52931.56332.73026.826.926.933.48029.627.725.125.825.130.110030.525.225.724.425.132.812530.125.725.724.826.23016030.227.626.524.126.830.520028.424.323.322.223.629.425030.723.52824.121.931.731535.225.72522.420.53540039.430.921.321.32036.750037.825.320.520.318.336.963037.6252020.11837.880040.126.629.824.717.839.410004026.623.120.517.44012504031.419.920.719.640.5160043.428.919.819.61843.520004428.421.418.917.844.3250044.727.519.618.917.945.4315042.726.918.918.417.842.3400041.124.318.518.617.940.650004022.818.518.418.139.6630039.521.818.218.217.938.9800037.620.6181817.9371000036.518.918.11817.935.61250035.118.318.517.917.9341600030.317.918.117.917.829.1SPL53.438.933.83230.553.4N8.9321.71.48.8median 37.8median 25.3median 20median 20.1median 18median 37Delta4.12.52.521.23.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
32 / 34 / 39 dB(A)
Hög belastning
53 / 53 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Noise
4%
0%
8%
1%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
29
3%
31
-3%
Idle Minimum *
32
30
6%
31
3%
30.5
5%
31
3%
Idle Average *
34
33
3%
34
-0%
31.5
7%
34
-0%
Idle Maximum *
39
39
-0%
39
-0%
31.5
19%
37
5%
Load Average *
53
45
15%
46
13%
40.6
23%
47
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
49
-2%
53
-10%
49.5
-3%
50
-4%
Load Maximum *
53
51
4%
55
-4%
53.4
-1%
54
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 48 °C53 °C53 °C 
 44 °C45 °C42 °C 
 34 °C36 °C30 °C 
Max: 53 °C
Medel: 42.8 °C
52 °C55 °C48 °C
50 °C53 °C45 °C
37 °C38 °C35 °C
Max: 55 °C
Medel: 45.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  45 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Heat
0%
-10%
-24%
-13%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
49
8%
58
-9%
48.8
8%
60
-13%
Maximum Bottom *
55
59
-7%
64
-16%
55
-0%
66
-20%
Idle Upper Side *
28
28
-0%
30
-7%
41
-46%
30
-7%
Idle Bottom *
29
29
-0%
31
-7%
45.6
-57%
32
-10%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.636.32539.142.83133.236.54032.339.9502936.56326.9378025.136.210025.136.712526.240.416026.844.220023.644.325021.953.931520.557.94002069.450018.378.86301883.480017.886.1100017.482.6125019.680.716001881.2200017.879.9250017.976.7315017.873.7400017.972.1500018.170.5630017.969.5800017.971.61000017.962.51250017.955.71600017.849.8SPL30.591.1N1.483.5median 18median 71.6Delta1.212.731.734.233.7373032.936.637.134.23527.634.32833.424.63823.847.123.952.821.550.722.160.321.664.420.56719.5621868.217.970.518.369.720.869.618.769.717.469.917.769.317.668.517.267.417.464.117.363.217.364.417.162.217.258.517.254.430.5801.448.9median 18median 64.41.87.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GS66 Stealth 10SFSAcer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 1.4 / 1.8 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 13 / 16 / 27 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 109 / 236 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Power Consumption
24%
-17%
-109%
15%
Idle Minimum *
13
7
46%
21
-62%
46
-254%
11
15%
Idle Average *
16
12
25%
23
-44%
59
-269%
15
6%
Idle Maximum *
27
22
19%
32
-19%
65.5
-143%
21
22%
Load Average *
109
86
21%
97
11%
99.8
8%
94
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
155
144
7%
148
5%
154.1
1%
143
8%
Load Maximum *
236
177
25%
213
10%
222.7
6%
173
27%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
8tim 25min
WiFi Websurfing
6tim 04min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 42min
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q,  Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
19%
34%
-48%
-14%
-3%
Reader / Idle
505
666
32%
545
8%
221
-56%
439
-13%
544 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years)
8%
WiFi v1.3
364
478
31%
421
16%
129
-65%
340
-7%
368 ?(57 - 745, n=180, last 2 years)
1%
Load
102
96
-6%
181
77%
80
-22%
79
-23%
84.4 ?(36 - 173, n=142, last 2 years)
-17%
H.264
408
399 ?(56 - 747, n=91, last 2 years)

För

+ Fler servicemöjligheter än föregångaren
+ Höljet är mycket robustare
+ Skärmlocket har en större öppningsvinkel
+ Moderna USB-anslutningar (inklusive TB3)
+ Kraftfullt batteri
+ Elegant design
+ 300 Hz-skärm

Emot

- CPU:n passar inte bra ihop med det bärbara konceptet / kylsystemet
- Irriterande fläktar (Varvar upp, egenheter, ljudnivå)
- Tangentbordet tar tid att vänja sig vid
- Ingen kortläsare
- Mediokert ljud
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS, recensionsex från MSI Germany
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS, recensionsex från MSI Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

GS66 är ett tydligt steg framåt jämfört med GS65.

MSI har tagit hand om de viktigaste klagomålen och ger bättre stabilitet och fler servicemöjligheter till det kompakta höljet. GS66 förtjänar också beröm för moderna anslutningar (Thunderbolt 3), en snabb och kontrastrik 300 Hz-skärm samt ett stort batteri, även om det inte riktigt lyckades leva upp till sin potential.

Vi förstår däremot inte riktigt valet av processor. Core i9-10980HK är förstås väldigt lockande från ett marknadsföringsperspektiv och i fråga om prestanda, men då man som kund snarare får leva med nackdelarna (väldigt höga temperaturer och hög ljudnivå) istället för fördelarna (högre prestandapotential) känns det inte som att man som leverantör borde erbjuda det alternativet till en laptop som är designad för mobilitet.

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS - 05/17/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Design
78 / 98 → 80%
Tangentbord
77%
Mus
86%
Anslutningar
62 / 80 → 78%
Vikt
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Batteri
69 / 95 → 73%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
93%
Programprestanda
93%
Temperatur
78 / 95 → 82%
Ljudnivå
59 / 90 → 66%
Audio
74%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Medel
74%
83%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
MSI GS66 Stealth
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS - Visuellt nedtonad, akustiskt slående (Sammanfattning)
Florian Glaser, 2020-05-11 (Update: 2020-05-11)