Test: MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS - Visuellt nedtonad, akustiskt slående (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.8 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.3 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.8 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 316 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1505:1 (Svärta: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -7% | -5% | -6% | -8% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 69.5 | 64.6 -7% | 65.3 -6% | 66.2 -5% | 64 -8% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.6 | 92.6 -7% | 95.5 -4% | 92.3 -7% | 90.3 -9% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.8 | 66 -7% | 66.5 -6% | 67.2 -5% | 65.4 -8% |
Response Times | 23% | -13% | -11% | 3% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14 ? | 5.2 ? 63% | 15.2 ? -9% | 15.2 ? -9% | 9.6 ? 31% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9.6 ? | 11.2 ? -17% | 11.2 ? -17% | 10.8 ? -13% | 12 ? -25% |
PWM Frequency | 23580 ? | ||||
Screen | -7% | -8% | -34% | -12% | |
Brightness middle | 316 | 288 -9% | 266 -16% | 324.8 3% | 313 -1% |
Brightness | 311 | 265 -15% | 248 -20% | 316 2% | 295 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 84 -9% | 89 -3% | 84 -9% | 89 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.22 -5% | 0.31 -48% | 0.26 -24% | 0.3 -43% |
Contrast | 1505 | 1309 -13% | 858 -43% | 1249 -17% | 1043 -31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.03 | 3.22 -6% | 2.78 8% | 4.96 -64% | 3.33 -10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.32 | 6.26 14% | 5.96 19% | 8.95 -22% | 6.25 15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1.5 -36% | 0.91 17% | 3.23 -194% | 1.77 -61% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 3.43 12% | 3.58 8% | 5 -28% | 3.1 21% |
Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.41 91% | 2.46 89% | 2.21 100% | 2.51 88% |
CCT | 7439 87% | 7290 89% | 7186 90% | 7742 84% | 6930 94% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65 | 60 -8% | 62 -5% | 59.8 -8% | 59 -9% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 93 -7% | 96 -4% | 91.8 -8% | 90 -10% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
-4% | -9% /
-8% | -17% /
-26% | -6% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise | |
↘ 7.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8799 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=190, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=194, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=194, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=195, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=195, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=194, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=191, last 2 years) |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=195, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -4% | -4% | 2% | -12% | |
Write 4K | 131.3 | 108.8 -17% | 115.5 -12% | 137.4 5% | 108.7 -17% |
Read 4K | 45.84 | 40.31 -12% | 58 27% | 41.37 -10% | 41.4 -10% |
Write Seq | 2370 | 2488 5% | 1555 -34% | 2500 5% | 1083 -54% |
Read Seq | 1509 | 1916 27% | 2590 72% | 1576 4% | 917 -39% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 481.5 | 382.4 -21% | 369.3 -23% | 446.7 -7% | 468.5 -3% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 560 | 421.8 -25% | 441.7 -21% | 522 -7% | 530 -5% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2392 | 2542 6% | 1547 -35% | 2796 17% | 3057 28% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3232 | 3320 3% | 2969 -8% | 3415 6% | 3422 6% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 21934 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 45202 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17312 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 7272 poäng | |
Hjälp |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=174, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 182 | 174 | 153 | 83.4 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 131 | 70.5 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 153 | 138 | 128 | 120 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 113 | 97.4 | 82.3 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 102 | 91 | ||
Battlefield V (2018) | 121 | 113 | ||
Apex Legends (2019) | 140 | 139 | ||
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 76.3 | 58.9 | ||
FIFA 20 (2019) | 196 | 190 | ||
Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 88.2 | 80.7 | ||
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 95 | 88.8 | ||
Escape from Tarkov (2020) | 121 | 119 | ||
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 91.6 | |||
Doom Eternal (2020) | 141 | 137 | ||
Gears Tactics (2020) | 116 | 90.6 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 32 / 34 / 39 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 53 / 53 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | 0% | 8% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 29 3% | 31 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 32 | 30 6% | 31 3% | 30.5 5% | 31 3% |
Idle Average * | 34 | 33 3% | 34 -0% | 31.5 7% | 34 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 39 | 39 -0% | 39 -0% | 31.5 19% | 37 5% |
Load Average * | 53 | 45 15% | 46 13% | 40.6 23% | 47 11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 49 -2% | 53 -10% | 49.5 -3% | 50 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 53 | 51 4% | 55 -4% | 53.4 -1% | 54 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 0% | -10% | -24% | -13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 53 | 49 8% | 58 -9% | 48.8 8% | 60 -13% |
Maximum Bottom * | 55 | 59 -7% | 64 -16% | 55 -0% | 66 -20% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 28 -0% | 30 -7% | 41 -46% | 30 -7% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 29 -0% | 31 -7% | 45.6 -57% | 32 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 1.4 / 1.8 Watt |
Låg belastning | 13 / 16 / 27 Watt |
Hög belastning |
109 / 236 Watt |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 24% | -17% | -109% | 15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 13 | 7 46% | 21 -62% | 46 -254% | 11 15% |
Idle Average * | 16 | 12 25% | 23 -44% | 59 -269% | 15 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 27 | 22 19% | 32 -19% | 65.5 -143% | 21 22% |
Load Average * | 109 | 86 21% | 97 11% | 99.8 8% | 94 14% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 155 | 144 7% | 148 5% | 154.1 1% | 143 8% |
Load Maximum * | 236 | 177 25% | 213 10% | 222.7 6% | 173 27% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 19% | 34% | -48% | -14% | -1% | |
Reader / Idle | 505 | 666 32% | 545 8% | 221 -56% | 439 -13% | 564 ? 12% |
WiFi v1.3 | 364 | 478 31% | 421 16% | 129 -65% | 340 -7% | 373 ? 2% |
Load | 102 | 96 -6% | 181 77% | 80 -22% | 79 -23% | 85.5 ? -16% |
H.264 | 408 | 408 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
GS66 är ett tydligt steg framåt jämfört med GS65.
MSI har tagit hand om de viktigaste klagomålen och ger bättre stabilitet och fler servicemöjligheter till det kompakta höljet. GS66 förtjänar också beröm för moderna anslutningar (Thunderbolt 3), en snabb och kontrastrik 300 Hz-skärm samt ett stort batteri, även om det inte riktigt lyckades leva upp till sin potential.
Vi förstår däremot inte riktigt valet av processor. Core i9-10980HK är förstås väldigt lockande från ett marknadsföringsperspektiv och i fråga om prestanda, men då man som kund snarare får leva med nackdelarna (väldigt höga temperaturer och hög ljudnivå) istället för fördelarna (högre prestandapotential) känns det inte som att man som leverantör borde erbjuda det alternativet till en laptop som är designad för mobilitet.
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
-
05/17/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser