Notebookcheck

Test: Honor 10 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 05/27/2018

Utmana på slagsmål. Honor 10 är årets flaggskeppsmodell från Huaweis dotterbolag och har toppskikts-specifikationer och en stark dual-kamera till ett mittenskikts-pris. Dessutom kommer denna smartphone i nya och ovanliga färger. Ett lågt pris är trevligt, men i vårt test kommer vi utvärdera vilka tillkortakommanden du i gengäld behöver stå ut med.
Uppdatering: Testet färdigställt.

Honor 10
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
5.84 tum 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixlar 432 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, 10 punkters multitouch, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: kombinerad anslutning för hörlurar och mikrofon (3.5 mm), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerationssensor, gyroskop, närhetssensor, kompass, BeiDou, IR-blaster, USB OTG, USB PD
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 och 1900 MHz) UMTS/HSPA+ (Band 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20 (alla FDD), 38, 29 och 40 (TDD)), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.7 x 149.6 x 71.2
Batteri
3400 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 24 MPix + 16 MPix (f/1.8, EIS, UHD video)
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix (4-i-1 Lightfusion)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, Laddare, USB-kabel, Gel-skydd, SIM-verktyg, snabbstartsguide, säkerhetsguide, EMUI 8.1, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR (Huvud): 0.79 W/kg, SAR (Kropp): 1.15 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
153 g, Strömförsörjning: 103 g
Pris
449 Kr

 

All color variations of the Honor 10
All color variations of the Honor 10
Honor 10 and its predecessor, the Honor 9 (left to right)
Honor 10 and its predecessor, the Honor 9 (right to left)
Honor 10 and its predecessor, the Honor 9 (right to left)

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P20
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
637 MBit/s ∼100% +203%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s ∼52% +59%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
283 MBit/s ∼44% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼44% +33%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼39% +18%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
210 MBit/s ∼33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (30.5 - 939, n=243)
189 MBit/s ∼30% -10%
Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼18% -46%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P20
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
397 MBit/s ∼100% +68%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
329 MBit/s ∼83% +39%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s ∼77% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
269 MBit/s ∼68% +14%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
236 MBit/s ∼59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 703, n=243)
185 MBit/s ∼47% -22%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140 MBit/s ∼35% -41%
Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼28% -52%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Honor 10
Honor 10
Honor 10
Honor 10
Honor 10
Honor 10
Honor 10: standard wide-angle
Honor 10: standard wide-angle
Honor 10: 2x hybrid zoom
Honor 10: 2x hybrid zoom
Image 1
Image 1
Image 2
Image 2

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
543
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
540
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 555 cd/m² Medel: 536.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.77 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 555 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1423:1 (Svärta: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
97.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Honor 10
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Huawei P20 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Huawei P20
LTPS, 2240x1080, 5.8
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.6
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-4%
-36%
36%
-24%
-8%
-18%
Brightness middle
555
550
-1%
528
-5%
753
36%
541
-3%
458
-17%
656
18%
Brightness
537
535
0%
525
-2%
748
39%
538
0%
463
-14%
634
18%
Brightness Distribution
94
92
-2%
89
-5%
96
2%
96
2%
92
-2%
93
-1%
Black Level *
0.39
0.42
-8%
0.51
-31%
0.37
5%
0.22
44%
0.4
-3%
Contrast
1423
1310
-8%
1035
-27%
2035
43%
2082
46%
1640
15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.3
3.3
-43%
4.7
-104%
1.3
43%
5.8
-152%
4
-74%
5.3
-130%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6
4.5
25%
8.9
-48%
2.3
62%
7.4
-23%
7.8
-30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.9
3.6
8%
6.4
-64%
1.7
56%
2.7
31%
4.7
-21%
5.2
-33%
Gamma
2.19 110%
2.38 101%
2.22 108%
2.18 110%
2.07 116%
2.19 110%
2.22 108%
CCT
6212 105%
7226 90%
7987 81%
66.76 9736%
6570 99%
7425 88%
7905 82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8895 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.2 ms rise
↘ 14.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 10
174272 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
83284 Points ∼46% -52%
Nokia 7 Plus
117165 Points ∼65% -33%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
68282 Points ∼38% -61%
Sony Xperia XZ1
167748 Points ∼94% -4%
Huawei P20
179393 Points ∼100% +3%
Motorola Moto G6
59454 Points ∼33% -66%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (173653 - 179709, n=6)
177100 Points ∼99% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=336)
70824 Points ∼39% -59%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 10
205297 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
116746 Points ∼57% -43%
Nokia 7 Plus
141701 Points ∼69% -31%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
87300 Points ∼42% -57%
Huawei P20
200756 Points ∼97% -2%
Motorola Moto G6
71352 Points ∼35% -65%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (200756 - 212278, n=4)
206573 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 290397, n=113)
103239 Points ∼50% -50%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor 10
7046 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5214 Points ∼74% -26%
Nokia 7 Plus
6077 Points ∼86% -14%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5085 Points ∼72% -28%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6443 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei P20
7002 Points ∼99% -1%
Motorola Moto G6
4552 Points ∼65% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6724 - 7046, n=6)
6932 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3138 - 8601, n=201)
4453 Points ∼63% -37%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 10
8530 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5916 Points ∼68% -31%
Nokia 7 Plus
6825 Points ∼78% -20%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
6264 Points ∼72% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ1
7056 Points ∼81% -17%
Huawei P20
8700 Points ∼100% +2%
Motorola Moto G6
5321 Points ∼61% -38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8115 - 8700, n=6)
8405 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2516 - 10264, n=365)
4677 Points ∼54% -45%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Honor 10
1316 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1195 Points ∼91% -9%
Nokia 7 Plus
1101 Points ∼84% -16%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
766 Points ∼58% -42%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1181 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei P20
1313 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G6
688 Points ∼52% -48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1184 - 1316, n=6)
1262 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=441)
672 Points ∼51% -49%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 10
4397 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1331 Points ∼22% -70%
Nokia 7 Plus
2298 Points ∼39% -48%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1496 Points ∼25% -66%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5923 Points ∼100% +35%
Huawei P20
3697 Points ∼62% -16%
Motorola Moto G6
965 Points ∼16% -78%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3657 - 4397, n=6)
3883 Points ∼66% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=441)
1505 Points ∼25% -66%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 10
3808 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
2275 Points ∼55% -40%
Nokia 7 Plus
2503 Points ∼60% -34%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1380 Points ∼33% -64%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1752 Points ∼42% -54%
Huawei P20
4154 Points ∼100% +9%
Motorola Moto G6
770 Points ∼19% -80%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3808 - 4276, n=6)
4095 Points ∼99% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=441)
1124 Points ∼27% -70%
System (sort by value)
Honor 10
5882 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4358 Points ∼74% -26%
Nokia 7 Plus
4976 Points ∼85% -15%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3319 Points ∼56% -44%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5840 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P20
5797 Points ∼99% -1%
Motorola Moto G6
2560 Points ∼44% -56%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (5195 - 5965, n=6)
5552 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=441)
2244 Points ∼38% -62%
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 10
3374 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1993 Points ∼59% -41%
Nokia 7 Plus
2369 Points ∼70% -30%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1513 Points ∼45% -55%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2909 Points ∼86% -14%
Huawei P20
3288 Points ∼97% -3%
Motorola Moto G6
1069 Points ∼32% -68%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3147 - 3374, n=6)
3245 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=444)
1134 Points ∼34% -66%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Honor 10
8634 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3680 Points ∼43% -57%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3942 Points ∼46% -54%
Sony Xperia XZ1
7979 Points ∼92% -8%
Motorola Moto G6
2777 Points ∼32% -68%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8025 - 9015, n=4)
8562 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14362, n=138)
3831 Points ∼44% -56%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 10
6610 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4431 Points ∼66% -33%
Nokia 7 Plus
5867 Points ∼88% -11%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
4172 Points ∼62% -37%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6493 Points ∼97% -2%
Huawei P20
6557 Points ∼98% -1%
Motorola Moto G6
3868 Points ∼58% -41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6557 - 6792, n=6)
6686 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1131 - 10558, n=185)
3970 Points ∼59% -40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 10
1890 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1526 Points ∼80% -19%
Nokia 7 Plus
1646 Points ∼87% -13%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
865 Points ∼46% -54%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1856 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei P20
1886 Points ∼99% 0%
Motorola Moto G6
743 Points ∼39% -61%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1883 - 1922, n=6)
1900 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=186)
1175 Points ∼62% -38%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 10
2582 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1950 Points ∼67% -24%
Nokia 7 Plus
2749 Points ∼94% +6%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1751 Points ∼60% -32%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2928 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei P20
2795 Points ∼95% +8%
Motorola Moto G6
1834 Points ∼63% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2582 - 2931, n=6)
2832 Points ∼97% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (530 - 3669, n=290)
1554 Points ∼53% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 10
2993 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
618 Points ∼16% -79%
Nokia 7 Plus
1161 Points ∼29% -61%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
726 Points ∼18% -76%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3961 Points ∼100% +32%
Huawei P20
3040 Points ∼77% +2%
Motorola Moto G6
363 Points ∼9% -88%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2844 - 3040, n=6)
2987 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (67 - 5220, n=290)
1056 Points ∼27% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 10
2891 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
729 Points ∼20% -75%
Nokia 7 Plus
1332 Points ∼36% -54%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
835 Points ∼23% -71%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3673 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei P20
2982 Points ∼81% +3%
Motorola Moto G6
442 Points ∼12% -85%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2850 - 2999, n=6)
2950 Points ∼80% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (83 - 4732, n=298)
1012 Points ∼28% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 10
2773 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1946 Points ∼69% -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
2734 Points ∼97% -1%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1785 Points ∼64% -36%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2564 Points ∼91% -8%
Huawei P20
2811 Points ∼100% +1%
Motorola Moto G6
1803 Points ∼64% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1906 - 2896, n=6)
2687 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (524 - 3642, n=321)
1455 Points ∼52% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 10
3573 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
879 Points ∼15% -75%
Nokia 7 Plus
1895 Points ∼31% -47%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1289 Points ∼21% -64%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6057 Points ∼100% +70%
Huawei P20
3550 Points ∼59% -1%
Motorola Moto G6
690 Points ∼11% -81%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1954 - 3573, n=6)
3215 Points ∼53% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=321)
1426 Points ∼24% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 10
3358 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1001 Points ∼22% -70%
Nokia 7 Plus
2035 Points ∼44% -39%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1374 Points ∼30% -59%
Sony Xperia XZ1
4649 Points ∼100% +38%
Huawei P20
3354 Points ∼72% 0%
Motorola Moto G6
800 Points ∼17% -76%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1943 - 3358, n=6)
3077 Points ∼66% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6378, n=329)
1227 Points ∼26% -63%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 10
21070 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
13306 Points ∼58% -37%
Nokia 7 Plus
20085 Points ∼87% -5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
13014 Points ∼56% -38%
Sony Xperia XZ1
23046 Points ∼100% +9%
Huawei P20
23046 Points ∼100% +9%
Motorola Moto G6
13997 Points ∼61% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (14556 - 23046, n=6)
20892 Points ∼91% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5462 - 36494, n=476)
12164 Points ∼53% -42%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 10
32674 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15262 Points ∼32% -53%
Nokia 7 Plus
29333 Points ∼61% -10%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
18386 Points ∼38% -44%
Sony Xperia XZ1
47857 Points ∼100% +46%
Huawei P20
34146 Points ∼71% +5%
Motorola Moto G6
12441 Points ∼26% -62%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (22429 - 36231, n=6)
32160 Points ∼67% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=476)
15585 Points ∼33% -52%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 10
29111 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
14779 Points ∼47% -49%
Nokia 7 Plus
26610 Points ∼84% -9%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
16841 Points ∼53% -42%
Sony Xperia XZ1
31618 Points ∼100% +9%
Huawei P20
30845 Points ∼98% +6%
Motorola Moto G6
12756 Points ∼40% -56%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (20022 - 31605, n=6)
28725 Points ∼91% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=477)
13472 Points ∼43% -54%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 10
124 fps ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
34 fps ∼27% -73%
Nokia 7 Plus
50 fps ∼40% -60%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
30 fps ∼24% -76%
Sony Xperia XZ1
111 fps ∼89% -10%
Huawei P20
125 fps ∼100% +1%
Motorola Moto G6
22 fps ∼18% -82%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (97 - 125, n=6)
117 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=502)
27 fps ∼22% -78%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 10
59 fps ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
31 fps ∼52% -47%
Nokia 7 Plus
48 fps ∼80% -19%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
29 fps ∼48% -51%
Sony Xperia XZ1
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Huawei P20
59 fps ∼98% 0%
Motorola Moto G6
20 fps ∼33% -66%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (59 - 60, n=6)
59.5 fps ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=505)
23.5 fps ∼39% -60%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 10
59 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
16 fps ∼27% -73%
Nokia 7 Plus
23 fps ∼39% -61%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼24% -76%
Sony Xperia XZ1
56 fps ∼95% -5%
Huawei P20
59 fps ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G6
9.4 fps ∼16% -84%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (53 - 66, n=6)
58.7 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=425)
14.4 fps ∼24% -76%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 10
50 fps ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15 fps ∼27% -70%
Nokia 7 Plus
22 fps ∼39% -56%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼25% -72%
Sony Xperia XZ1
52 fps ∼93% +4%
Huawei P20
56 fps ∼100% +12%
Motorola Moto G6
8.9 fps ∼16% -82%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (50 - 56, n=6)
53.7 fps ∼96% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=427)
14.5 fps ∼26% -71%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10
39 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.9 fps ∼24% -75%
Nokia 7 Plus
14 fps ∼34% -64%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.7 fps ∼24% -75%
Sony Xperia XZ1
41 fps ∼100% +5%
Huawei P20
39 fps ∼95% 0%
Motorola Moto G6
6.1 fps ∼15% -84%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (21 - 39, n=6)
35.5 fps ∼87% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=288)
12.5 fps ∼30% -68%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10
34 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.6 fps ∼23% -72%
Nokia 7 Plus
15 fps ∼36% -56%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.5 fps ∼23% -72%
Sony Xperia XZ1
42 fps ∼100% +24%
Huawei P20
39 fps ∼93% +15%
Motorola Moto G6
5.8 fps ∼14% -83%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (34 - 39, n=6)
36.7 fps ∼87% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (2.5 - 110, n=290)
12.6 fps ∼30% -63%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10
23 fps ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
6 fps ∼25% -74%
Nokia 7 Plus
8.3 fps ∼35% -64%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼22% -77%
Sony Xperia XZ1
24 fps ∼100% +4%
Huawei P20
23 fps ∼96% 0%
Motorola Moto G6
3.4 fps ∼14% -85%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (21 - 23, n=6)
22 fps ∼92% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.76 - 35, n=219)
8.51 fps ∼35% -63%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 10
20 fps ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5.8 fps ∼23% -71%
Nokia 7 Plus
9.1 fps ∼36% -54%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼21% -73%
Sony Xperia XZ1
25 fps ∼100% +25%
Huawei P20
23 fps ∼92% +15%
Motorola Moto G6
3.3 fps ∼13% -83%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (20 - 23, n=6)
21.5 fps ∼86% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 50, n=222)
7.82 fps ∼31% -61%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3.052 fps ∼13%
Nokia 7 Plus
15.07 fps ∼64%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.81 fps ∼41%
Motorola Moto G6
5.38 fps ∼23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (21.5 - 25.9, n=2)
23.7 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼51%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
355 Points ∼42%
Nokia 7 Plus
349 Points ∼42%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
190 Points ∼23%
Motorola Moto G6
129 Points ∼15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (788 - 887, n=2)
838 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 1702, n=62)
573 Points ∼68%

Legend

 
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P20 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
61.335 Points ∼100% +9%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
58.6 Points ∼96% +4%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
56.506 Points ∼92%
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
56.188 Points ∼92% -1%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.89 Points ∼88% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (34.9 - 58.6, n=6)
53.5 Points ∼87% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
49.07 Points ∼80% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (11.4 - 224, n=360)
33.7 Points ∼55% -40%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
28.09 Points ∼46% -50%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
23.424 Points ∼38% -59%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
22.556 Points ∼37% -60%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
11468 Points ∼100% +5%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
10965 Points ∼96%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points ∼95% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6729 - 11584, n=6)
10393 Points ∼91% -5%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
10208 Points ∼89% -7%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
10096 Points ∼88% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
9350 Points ∼82% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=496)
5011 Points ∼44% -54%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
4398 Points ∼38% -60%
Huawei P20 Lite
4191 Points ∼37% -62%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
3943 Points ∼34% -64%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=515)
11883 ms * ∼100% -205%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
11751.4 ms * ∼99% -201%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
10788.1 ms * ∼91% -177%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
9425 ms * ∼79% -142%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
4275.2 ms * ∼36% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6013, n=6)
4173 ms * ∼35% -7%
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
3978.9 ms * ∼33% -2%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937.3 ms * ∼33% -1%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
3899 ms * ∼33%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
3267.9 ms * ∼28% +16%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
3149 ms * ∼27% +19%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
182 Points ∼100% 0%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
182 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
170 Points ∼93% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (156 - 182, n=6)
170 Points ∼93% -7%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
156 Points ∼86% -14%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
107 Points ∼59% -41%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=246)
99.4 Points ∼55% -45%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
95 Points ∼52% -48%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
90 Points ∼49% -51%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
86 Points ∼47% -53%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P20
69 Points ∼100% 0%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
69 Points ∼100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (69 - 69, n=3)
69 Points ∼100% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
63 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 130, n=35)
54 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
34 Points ∼49% -51%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
31 Points ∼45% -55%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 10Honor 9Samsung Galaxy A8 2018Nokia 7 PlusAsus ZenFone 4 ZE554KLSony Xperia XZ1Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-50%
-61%
-52%
-52%
-24%
-9%
-77%
Random Write 4KB
163
32.7
-80%
14.69
-91%
19.62
-88%
7.59
-95%
14.93
-91%
114 (20 - 164, n=10)
-30%
13.5 (0.14 - 164, n=549)
-92%
Random Read 4KB
145.88
55.7
-62%
82.62
-43%
54.65
-63%
68.57
-53%
156.61
7%
140 (132 - 147, n=10)
-4%
34.5 (1.59 - 173, n=549)
-76%
Sequential Write 256KB
192.12
204
6%
104.2
-46%
211.6
10%
205.27
7%
204.43
6%
202 (192 - 212, n=10)
5%
71.7 (2.99 - 228, n=549)
-63%
Sequential Read 256KB
827.69
293
-65%
299.94
-64%
283.12
-66%
287.38
-65%
679.13
-18%
768 (699 - 832, n=10)
-7%
211 (12.1 - 832, n=549)
-75%
PUBG Mobile
 InställningarVärde
 HD32 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 InställningarVärde
 high HD58 fps
Hög belastning
 35.9 °C35.9 °C34.2 °C 
 35.6 °C35.9 °C35 °C 
 34.5 °C34.7 °C35.4 °C 
Max: 35.9 °C
Medel: 35.2 °C
30.7 °C32.7 °C36.4 °C
31.1 °C33 °C35.8 °C
30.3 °C32.4 °C34.3 °C
Max: 36.4 °C
Medel: 33 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  29.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.243.42532.939.93137.238.54031.739.35039.638.96328.332.88027.333.710026.934.412526.730.21602432.820020.946.325020.952.231519.555.840018.558.950017.561.963017.563.880015.762.8100015.867.6125016.669.5160015.871.3200015.474.3250015.574.931501674.3400015.873.450001673.4630016.373.9800016.372.71000016.269.71250016.462.71600016.447.4SPL28.684.2N1.156.9median 16.4Honor 10median 63.8Delta2.111.735.244.432.941.737.232.531.737.339.641.828.335.827.335.926.934.126.7362439.920.944.820.952.219.550.118.554.117.564.817.561.815.769.215.873.816.675.115.874.115.474.115.574.71675.915.8741672.216.374.316.371.916.268.216.456.416.452.128.685.31.161.3median 16.4Nokia 7 Plusmedian 68.22.111.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 7 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.26 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.12 / 2.26 / 2.3 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.14 / 7.89 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 10
3400 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
1%
17%
39%
10%
-0%
12%
23%
Idle Minimum *
1.12
1.13
-1%
0.65
42%
0.67
40%
0.84
25%
0.51
54%
0.903 (0.67 - 1.12, n=6)
19%
0.866 (0.2 - 3.4, n=576)
23%
Idle Average *
2.26
2.25
-0%
1.76
22%
1.02
55%
2.31
-2%
2.16
4%
1.945 (1.15 - 2.36, n=6)
14%
1.697 (0.6 - 6.2, n=575)
25%
Idle Maximum *
2.3
2.3
-0%
1.78
23%
1.1
52%
2.33
-1%
2.23
3%
2 (1.23 - 2.41, n=6)
13%
1.945 (0.74 - 6.6, n=576)
15%
Load Average *
5.14
4.89
5%
4.47
13%
3.86
25%
4.76
7%
7.45
-45%
4.61 (2.47 - 6.15, n=6)
10%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=570)
23%
Load Maximum *
7.89
7.99
-1%
9.13
-16%
5.97
24%
6.39
19%
9.28
-18%
7.52 (2.49 - 9.16, n=6)
5%
5.6 (1.2 - 14.2, n=570)
29%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
19tim 22min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 66)
11tim 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11tim 02min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 36min
Honor 10
3400 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
Huawei P20
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
3%
-16%
36%
22%
7%
16%
Reader / Idle
1162
1399
20%
750
-35%
1888
62%
1546
33%
1703
47%
1665
43%
H.264
662
564
-15%
470
-29%
810
22%
908
37%
706
7%
698
5%
WiFi v1.3
663
516
-22%
582
-12%
818
23%
646
-3%
672
1%
562
-15%
Load
216
278
29%
247
14%
295
37%
260
20%
158
-27%
286
32%

För

+ starkt förhållande mellan pris och prestanda
+ bra skärm
+ hyfsade högtalare
+ ovanliga färgalternativ
+ exakt GPS
+ Dual-SIM
+ snabb SoC
+ bra kamera

Emot

- få LTE-band stöds
- det går inte längre att utöka lagringen
- risk för överhettning vid konstant belastning
- bloatware
- bara Bluetooth 4.2
Test av Honor 10. Testenhet från Honor Germany.
Test av Honor 10. Testenhet från Honor Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Med 10 så tar Honor ett extra steg och erbjuder inte bara en finjusterad version av förra årets modell utan har också modiga färgvarianter och shockar konkurrensen med ett starkt utgångspris på ca 4 000 kronor.

Vid det här laget börjar det bli svårt att göra en direkt jämförelse med Huawei P20. Även om det på papperet finns många likheter så kan den mycket dyrare telefonen från moderbolaget göra allt åtminstone lite bättre. Det är bara systemprestandan som är liknande. På så sätt är skillnaden i pris enligt vårt tycke berättigat.

Den som letar efter en elegant smartphone med en känsla av hög kvalitet kan skaffa Honor 10 utan att behöva oroa sig.

Honor 10 är ändå en utmärkt smartphone. Den har en bra, ljusstark skärm som också är ganska stor, men ändå inte så gigantisk som hos en del konkurrenter. Lägg till detta en bra kamera, utmärkt batteritid och en snabb telefon. Tittar man bara på systemprestanda, utseende och känsla hade det aldrig gått att gissa att den "bara" kostar 4 000 kronor.

Det är också bra att den nu använder den snabbare UFS 2.1-lagringen, att dual-SIM erbjuds och att den har en väldigt exakt GPS. Å andra sidan kan det faktum att bara ett fåtal LTE-band stöds leda till en del frustration i USA. Men vi kan ändå ge Honor 10 en klar rekommendation.

Honor 10 - 05/23/2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Design
90%
Tangentbord
68 / 75 → 91%
Mus
93%
Anslutningar
45 / 60 → 75%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
63 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
70 / 70 → 100%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
78%
Medel
80%
89%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Honor 10 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-05-27 (Update: 2018-05-27)