Notebookcheck

Test: Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX - Från en annan värld (Sammanfattning)

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 12/18/2019

Gaming 2-i-1. Asus har ofta stått i rampljuset tack vare sina innovativa produkter. Efter den vattenkylda ROG GX700 kommer ytterligare en ovanlig laptop i form av ROG GZ700. Denna enhet på 17 tum står ut från mängden med en omvandlingsbar design. Men priset lämnar oss mållösa.

Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX (ROG Mothership GZ700 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-9980HK
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Kärna: 1675 MHz, Minne: 1788 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 441.41, Optimus oder G-Sync
Minne
65536 MB 
, 4x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dubbla kanaler, Alla platser upptagna
Skärm
17.3 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, glansig: nej, detachable screen
Moderkort
Intel HM370
Hårddisk
1x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ + 2x Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 (RAID 0), 1536 GB 
, Platser: 3x M.2 Typ 2280
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 1 hörlurar ut, 1 mikrofon in, Kortläsare: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 30 x 410 x 320
Batteri
90 Wh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: FHD
Övrigt
Högtalare: 4x 4W, Tangentbord: Chiclet RGB, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 2x 280 Watt Nätadapter, Ryggsäck, Cerberus gaming-headset, Gladius II gamingmus, Armoury Crate, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
4.76 kg, Strömförsörjning: 1.686 kg
Pris
7000 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
85%12/2019Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
4.8 kg30 mm17.3"1920x1080
86%Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
4.7 kg48 mm17.3"1920x1080
86%08/2019HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
3.3 kg27 mm17.3"1920x1080
86%05/2019MSI GE75 9SG
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
2.7 kg27.5 mm17.3"1920x1080
86%07/2019MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
4.2 kg42 mm17.3"1920x1080
86%03/2019Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
3.9 kg42 mm17.3"1920x1080

Storleksjämförelse

425 mm 319 mm 48 mm 4.7 kg402.6 mm 319.2 mm 42 mm 3.9 kg410 mm 320 mm 30 mm 4.8 kg397 mm 330 mm 42 mm 4.2 kg405 mm 295 mm 27 mm 3.3 kg397 mm 268.5 mm 27.5 mm 2.7 kg
Vänster: Thunderbolt 3, USB Typ A 3.0, Mikrofon, Headset, RJ45 LAN, 2x USB Typ A 3.1 Gen 2
Vänster: Thunderbolt 3, USB Typ A 3.0, Mikrofon, Headset, RJ45 LAN, 2x USB Typ A 3.1 Gen 2
Höger: 2x AC-adapter, HDMI, USB Typ A 3.1 Gen 2, USB-C 3.1 Gen 2, Kortläsare
Höger: 2x AC-adapter, HDMI, USB Typ A 3.1 Gen 2, USB-C 3.1 Gen 2, Kortläsare
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG G703GXR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194 MB/s ∼100% +134%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 206, n=264)
91.5 MB/s ∼47% +10%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83 MB/s ∼43%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼39% -8%
MSI GE75 9SG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.14 MB/s ∼14% -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG G703GXR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s ∼100% +170%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=262)
109 MB/s ∼44% +20%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
91 MB/s ∼37%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81 MB/s ∼33% -11%
MSI GE75 9SG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33.17 MB/s ∼13% -64%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1490 MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
690 MBit/s ∼46% -54%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
676 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
675 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
661 MBit/s ∼44% -56%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
652 MBit/s ∼44% -56%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1490, n=286)
620 MBit/s ∼42% -58%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1420 MBit/s ∼100%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
749 MBit/s ∼53% -47%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
730 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
680 MBit/s ∼48% -52%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
677 MBit/s ∼48% -52%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
629 MBit/s ∼44% -56%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1420, n=286)
573 MBit/s ∼40% -60%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
300
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 302 cd/m² Medel: 285 cd/m² Minimum: 31 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 283 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1230:1 (Svärta: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.87 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.82
ΔE Greyscale 7.19 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080
Asus ROG G703GXR
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
CMN175D, IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GE75 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 1920x1080
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
LG Philips 173WFG, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-15%
-101%
9%
-15%
-62%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
6 (3, 3)
6.4 (3.4, 3)
-7%
17.6 (8.4, 9.2)
-193%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
-20%
8 (4.4, 3.6)
-33%
13.2 (8, 5.2)
-120%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 (6, 4.4)
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-23%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
-8%
6.6 (3.2, 3.4)
37%
10 (5.2, 4.8)
4%
10.8 (6, 4.8)
-4%
PWM Frequency
25510 (44)
26040 (10)
26040 (20)
Screen
10%
28%
25%
25%
-3%
Brightness middle
283
290
2%
360
27%
400.7
42%
396
40%
335.2
18%
Brightness
285
281
-1%
342
20%
372
31%
373
31%
297
4%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
91
1%
89
-1%
89
-1%
82
-9%
Black Level *
0.23
0.2
13%
0.26
-13%
0.34
-48%
0.33
-43%
0.66
-187%
Contrast
1230
1450
18%
1385
13%
1179
-4%
1200
-2%
508
-59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.87
4.77
19%
1.91
67%
1.33
77%
2.04
65%
2.02
66%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.01
9.08
18%
4.08
63%
3.51
68%
3.85
65%
7.23
34%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.82
1.46
20%
0.78
57%
1.39
24%
0.82
55%
1.17
36%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.19
5.83
19%
2.72
62%
1.3
82%
2.83
61%
3.2
55%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.47 89%
2.37 93%
2.24 98%
2.49 88%
2.16 102%
CCT
8239 79%
8076 80%
6692 97%
6735 97%
7113 91%
6746 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58
59
2%
60
3%
58.2
0%
59
2%
61.3
6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90
92
2%
96
7%
92.1
2%
94
4%
96.9
8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-3% / 6%
-37% / 8%
17% / 22%
5% / 19%
-33% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13539 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000201020202030Tooltip
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1650 (1611.73-1806)
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1619 (1602.44-1728.31)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1998 (1943.92-2022.14)
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1875 (1847.15-1952.27)
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
509 Points ∼100% +14%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Core i9-9880H
467 Points ∼92% +5%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Intel Core i9-9980HK
445 Points ∼87%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
441 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 509, n=63)
431 Points ∼85% -3%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
423 Points ∼83% -5%
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
4926 Points ∼100% +19%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Intel Core i9-9980HK
4150 Points ∼84%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
3712 Points ∼75% -11%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
3110 Points ∼63% -25%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Core i9-9880H
2953 Points ∼60% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 4926, n=63)
2582 Points ∼52% -38%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points ∼100% +13%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Intel Core i9-9900K
207 Points ∼98% +10%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Core i9-9880H
197 Points ∼93% +5%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼89% +1%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Intel Core i9-9980HK
188 Points ∼89%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
171 Points ∼81% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=540)
157 Points ∼74% -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
2022 Points ∼100% +12%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Intel Core i9-9900K
1979 Points ∼98% +10%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1806 Points ∼89%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼85% -5%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Core i9-9880H
1450 Points ∼72% -20%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
1256 Points ∼62% -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=543)
845 Points ∼42% -53%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
188 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1806 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
7006 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK, 1x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ + 2x Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 (RAID 0)
6789 Points ∼97%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6599 Points ∼94% -3%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
6558 Points ∼94% -3%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6306 Points ∼90% -7%
Asus ROG G703GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5780 Points ∼83% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=236)
5261 Points ∼75% -23%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
1x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ + 2x Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 (RAID 0)
Asus ROG G703GXR
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
MSI GE75 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
AS SSD
-18%
-14%
-11%
-9%
-18%
Score Total
4412
3856
-13%
3994
-9%
4899
11%
4740
7%
4390
0%
4K-64 Write
1177.96
1647.26
40%
1137.51
-3%
1799.48
53%
1572.6
34%
1350.17
15%
4K-64 Read
1315.47
1091.52
-17%
1352.34
3%
1641.92
25%
1609.21
22%
1560.96
19%
4K Write
123.72
97.09
-22%
98.01
-21%
89.17
-28%
95.93
-22%
91.77
-26%
4K Read
37.41
43.83
17%
41.2
10%
27.02
-28%
30.42
-19%
24.14
-35%
Seq Write
4145.59
1888.14
-54%
2607.74
-37%
2381.34
-43%
2214.18
-47%
2334.75
-44%
Seq Read
4401.2
1030.27
-77%
2568.29
-42%
1358.11
-69%
2645.51
-40%
2081.75
-53%
1x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ + 2x Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 9006 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4413 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 580.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 509.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 5378 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4081 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 60.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 159.5 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
28126 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
55579 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
22005 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
10150 poäng
Hjälp
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110Tooltip
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK, 1x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ + 2x Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 (RAID 0): Ø100 (95-104)
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
6005 Points ∼100%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
5852 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
5660 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
5582 Points ∼93% -7%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
5543 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
5538 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1097 - 6005, n=71)
4027 Points ∼67% -33%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
10720 Points ∼100% +6%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
10243 Points ∼96% +1%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
10181 Points ∼95% 0%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
10149 Points ∼95%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
9754 Points ∼91% -4%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
9480 Points ∼88% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=178)
5831 Points ∼54% -43%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
27080 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
26009 Points ∼96%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
25727 Points ∼95% -1%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
25126 Points ∼93% -3%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
24623 Points ∼91% -5%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
22820 Points ∼84% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=567)
11619 Points ∼43% -55%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
38485 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
35882 Points ∼93%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
35754 Points ∼93% 0%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
34050 Points ∼88% -5%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
31826 Points ∼83% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=642)
13790 Points ∼36% -62%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
101.1 fps ∼100% +3%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
100 fps ∼99% +2%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK
98.3 (min: 83) fps ∼97%
Asus ROG G703GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H
97.1 (min: 80) fps ∼96% -1%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
95.3 fps ∼94% -3%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
91.7 (min: 76) fps ∼91% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=335)
50.8 fps ∼50% -48%
låg med. hög ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 181 98.3 fps
Control (2019) 92.1 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 104 89.4 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 267 262 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 111 83 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 127 89.7 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 159 136 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 99.2 90.1 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 111 108 fps
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 88.9 56.8 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.332.93431.736.52541.640.639.236.145.33144.331.732.430.137.84044.750.45033.238.35051.351.35130.4376335.433.534.229.249.48036.638.13827.847.410038.736.837.526.932.212532.728.930.627.23516032.632.533.527.44120031.330.631.223.136.725027.226.428.821.536.631528.326.927.122.537.140033.832.531.519.842.850036.536.134.918.843.663030.332.331.317.936.880031.430.329.817.840.9100031.329.428.517.639.5125029.328.227.917.840.9160027.627.126.617.142.4200026.526.325.617.143.2250024.824.624.317.242.4315023.22322.717.138.5400022.221.521.517.234.350002019.819.217.432.6630018.518.318.217.131.8800018.418.21817.130.31000018.11818.517.127.11250018.218.217.817.123.81600018.218.117.816.920.3SPL40.139.638.93051.7N3.53.33.31.48.3median 27.6median 26.9median 27.1median 17.6median 36.8Delta4.94.65.21.94.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Mothership GZ700GX

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
37 / 38 / 39 dB(A)
Hög belastning
40 / 52 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GE75 9SG
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
4%
0%
6%
-5%
-1%
8%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.2
6%
30
-0%
28.1
6%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=338)
2%
Idle Minimum *
37
33
11%
34
8%
30.4
18%
33
11%
28.1
24%
31.4 (28 - 42, n=761)
15%
Idle Average *
38
34
11%
35
8%
30.4
20%
34
11%
28.6
25%
32.6 (28 - 46.6, n=761)
14%
Idle Maximum *
39
35
10%
36
8%
33.4
14%
44
-13%
51
-31%
34.6 (28 - 52, n=761)
11%
Load Average *
40
38
5%
51
-28%
37.1
7%
47
-18%
51
-28%
40.8 (30.1 - 58, n=762)
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
50
-4%
47
2%
54.2
-13%
53
-10%
51
-6%
Load Maximum *
52
54
-4%
51
2%
56.4
-8%
59
-13%
51
2%
48.2 (38.9 - 64.1, n=762)
7%

* ... smaller is better

 31 °C39 °C34 °C 
 27 °C27 °C28 °C 
 27 °C27 °C27 °C 
Max: 39 °C
Medel: 29.7 °C
49 °C49 °C50 °C
50 °C51 °C45 °C
31 °C32 °C39 °C
Max: 51 °C
Medel: 44 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  48 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.8 °C / 3.2 F).
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GE75 9SG
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-9%
-12%
-27%
-8%
-17%
-9%
Maximum Upper Side *
39
46
-18%
47
-21%
48.8
-25%
51
-31%
47
-21%
45.9 (28 - 68.8, n=726)
-18%
Maximum Bottom *
51
49
4%
54
-6%
52
-2%
57
-12%
58.8
-15%
49.6 (25.9 - 78, n=724)
3%
Idle Upper Side *
25
31
-24%
32
-28%
36.2
-45%
26
-4%
31
-24%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=678)
-23%
Idle Bottom *
33
32
3%
30
9%
44.4
-35%
28
15%
35
-6%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=676)
4%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.731.72536.138.63130.131.94033.247.35030.447.56329.234.98027.84110026.949.312527.265.116027.472.420023.167.125021.569.931522.571.940019.875.850018.874.263017.969.380017.866.4100017.673.8125017.872.8160017.173.3200017.171250017.267.2315017.169400017.276.7500017.475.6630017.173.5800017.170.21000017.168.41250017.164.71600016.964.8SPL3084.8N1.468.4median 17.6median 70.2Delta1.93.334.837.441.542.832.539.931.839.12838.127.641.334.645.524.651.725.960.324.165.721.463.620.770.219.97318.777.318.680.218.180.817.482.117.479.618.581.718.280.817.880.617.581.717.582.117.582.717.476.517.672.617.669.717.667.217.660.817.351.730.192.11.498median 17.8median 76.51.57.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Mothership GZ700GXAsus ROG G703GXR
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus ROG G703GXR audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 3 / 5 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 37 / 48 / 59 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 105 / 349 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GE75 9SG
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
10%
21%
32%
21%
1%
39%
Idle Minimum *
37
27
27%
26
30%
13.9
62%
14
62%
23.3
37%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=722)
48%
Idle Average *
48
32
33%
29
40%
18.8
61%
18
62%
33.5
30%
24.9 (6.6 - 119, n=722)
48%
Idle Maximum *
59
39
34%
38
36%
23.1
61%
23
61%
38.4
35%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=722)
49%
Load Average *
105
124
-18%
106
-1%
112.3
-7%
114
-9%
114.1
-9%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=713)
1%
Load Maximum *
349
338
3%
287
18%
291.5
16%
443
-27%
485.1
-39%
173 (21.9 - 590, n=712)
50%
Witcher 3 ultra *
233
274
-18%
228
2%
231
1%
283
-21%
339.5
-46%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
3tim 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2tim 36min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 45min
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 90 Wh
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 96 Wh
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 70 Wh
MSI GE75 9SG
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 65 Wh
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 90 Wh
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 90 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
87%
8%
88%
57%
-23%
45%
Reader / Idle
180
484
169%
250
39%
409
127%
155
-14%
349 (39 - 1174, n=681)
94%
WiFi v1.3
156
367
135%
196
26%
294
88%
302
94%
127
-19%
259 (78 - 622, n=387)
66%
Load
105
61
-42%
63
-40%
52
-50%
66
-37%
78.9 (18 - 202, n=648)
-25%

För

+ Bra boost-prestanda från både CPU och GPU
+ Generöst portutbud
+ Extremt snabb RAID SSD
+ Intressant koncept
+ Optimus eller G-Sync
+ Riktigt snabbt (W)LAN
+ Kraftfullt ljud
+ 144 Hz

Emot

- Hög ljudnivå (Särskilt i turbo-läge)
- Tangentbordsenheten går att böja ganska mycket när den är ansluten
- En fläkt skramlar en aning (otur?)
- Ganska tung
- Extremt dyr
- 2 Nätadaptrar
ROG Mothership GZ700GX, recensionsex från Asus Taiwan
ROG Mothership GZ700GX, recensionsex från Asus Taiwan

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

I fråga om teknik och kvalitet är ROG Mothership GZ700GX en utmärkt toppskiktslaptop. Det lyxiga metallchassit innehåller inte bara massor av portar utan också en 144 Hz-skärm med bra kontrastförhållande, bra betraktningsvinklar och utmärkta responstider.

Prestandan är fantastisk. Intels Core i9-9980HK och Nvidias GeForce RTX 2080 utgör en extraordinärt snabb duo som har stöd av 64 GB DDR4 RAM och tre SSD-enheter i RAID 0. Vi imponerades också av det utmärkta ljudet och möjligheten att välja mellan G-Sync och Optimus.

Det största problemet med GZ700GX är det absurda priset. Asus tar ordentligt betalt för sin 2-i-1 design, men frågan om hur praktiskt den är återstår. ROG Mothership kostar nästan dubbelt så mycket som andra bärbara datorer med RTX 2080.

Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX - 12/15/2019 v7
Florian Glaser

Design
82 / 98 → 83%
Tangentbord
81%
Mus
78%
Anslutningar
73 / 80 → 91%
Vikt
41 / 10-66 → 54%
Batteri
49 / 95 → 51%
Skärm
81%
Spelprestanda
98%
Programprestanda
96%
Temperatur
89 / 95 → 93%
Ljudnivå
55 / 90 → 61%
Audio
88%
Medel
76%
85%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX - Från en annan värld (Sammanfattning)
Florian Glaser, 2019-12-18 (Update: 2019-12-18)