Notebookcheck

Test: Apple iPhone 12 - Apple-telefon med 5G (Sammanfattning)

Nygammalt utseende. iPhone 12 är kantigare än sin föregångare och har äntligen en OLED-skärm och stöd för 5G. Den är också mycket lättare och tunnare än förra årets modell. I den här recensionen får du reda på om Apple återigen skapat en hit.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Jesper Berg),
Apple iPhone 12 (iPhone Serie)
Processor
Apple A14 Bionic 6 x
Grafikkort
Apple A14 Bionic GPU
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.10 tum 21.1:9.75, 2532 x 1170 pixlar 457 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, OLED, True Tone, glansig: ja, HDR, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
64 GB SSD, 64 GB 
, 57 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
Ljudanslutningar: Ljud genom lightning-porten, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerationssensor, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass, Barometer
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (1/2/​3/​4/​5/​7/​8/​12/13/​17/​18/​19/​20/​25/​26/​28/​30/​32/​34/​38/​39/​40/​41/​42/​46/​48/​66), 5G (1/​2/​3/​5/​7/​8/​12/​20/​25/​28/​38/​40/​41/​66/77/78/79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.4 x 146.7 x 71.5
Batteri
2815 mAh Litiumjon, Laddning: 20W, 15W (MagSafe), 7.5W (Qi)
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Apple iOS 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/​1.6, fasjämförande-AF (Dual-pixel), OIS, Dubbel LED-blixt, Video @2160p/​60fps (kamera 1); 12.0MP, f/​2.4, vidvinkelslins (kamera 2)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix f/​2.2, video @2160p/​60fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Lightning till USB-C kabel, SIM-nål, 12 Månader Garanti, eSIM, IP68-certifierad, SAR: 1.19 W/kg (huvud), 1.17 W/kg (kropp), fanless, waterproof
Vikt
162 g
Pris
876 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88 %
11/2020
Apple iPhone 12
A14, A14 Bionic GPU
162 g64 GB SSD6.10"2532x1170
87 %
10/2019
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g64 GB SSD6.10"1792x828
87 %
09/2020
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650
235 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
89 %
04/2020
Huawei P40 Pro
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
209 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.58"2640x1200
88 %
10/2020
OnePlus 8T
SD 865, Adreno 650
188 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
88 %
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
192 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
Apple iPhone 12
Apple iPhone 12
Apple iPhone 12
Apple iPhone 12
Apple iPhone 12
Apple iPhone 12

Storleksjämförelse

165 mm 77.2 mm 8.9 mm 235 g161.6 mm 75.2 mm 8.3 mm 192 g160.7 mm 74.1 mm 8.4 mm 188 g158.2 mm 72.6 mm 8.95 mm 209 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.4 mm 162 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 (802min - 879max) MBit/s ∼100% +53%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
856 (776min - 899max) MBit/s ∼99% +51%
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
821 (388min - 998max) MBit/s ∼95% +45%
OnePlus 8T
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
767 (611min - 837max) MBit/s ∼89% +36%
Apple iPhone 12
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
566 (363min - 614max) MBit/s ∼66%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (490min - 597max) MBit/s ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=620)
286 MBit/s ∼33% -49%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1544 (797min - 1619max) MBit/s ∼100% +84%
Apple iPhone 12
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
840 (797min - 876max) MBit/s ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
833 (418min - 883max) MBit/s ∼54% -1%
OnePlus 8T
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
716 (679min - 724max) MBit/s ∼46% -15%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
693 (354min - 711max) MBit/s ∼45% -17%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (204min - 603max) MBit/s ∼34% -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=620)
273 MBit/s ∼18% -67%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø566 (363-614)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø840 (797-876)
Positioning Apple iPhone 12 – Översikt
Positioning Apple iPhone 12 – Översikt
Positioning Apple iPhone 12 – Sväng
Positioning Apple iPhone 12 – Sväng
Positioning Apple iPhone 12 – Bro
Positioning Apple iPhone 12 – Bro
Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
Garmin Edge 520 – Sväng
Garmin Edge 520 – Sväng

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptobjektiv BlumeHauptobjektiv UmgebungHauptobjektiv Low LightUltraweitwinkel
ColorChecker
25.2 ∆E
41 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
47.8 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
46.9 ∆E
48 ∆E
24 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
47.6 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 12: 34.33 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 48.04 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 12: 9.78 ∆E min: 3.58 - max: 18.29 ∆E
646
cd/m²
638
cd/m²
637
cd/m²
644
cd/m²
642
cd/m²
637
cd/m²
642
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 646 cd/m² Medel: 638.8 cd/m² Minimum: 6.95 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 97 %
Mitt på batteriet: 642 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.188
Apple iPhone 12
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.10
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.10
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Huawei P40 Pro
OLED, 2640x1200, 6.58
OnePlus 8T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.70
Screen
-3%
-29%
-27%
-3%
-84%
Brightness middle
642
679
6%
684
7%
584
-9%
743
16%
610
-5%
Brightness
639
671
5%
690
8%
576
-10%
734
15%
621
-3%
Brightness Distribution
97
93
-4%
95
-2%
95
-2%
91
-6%
95
-2%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.9
0.8
11%
1.3
-44%
1.1
-22%
0.89
1%
2.4
-167%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.42
2.4
1%
2.5
-3%
2.3
5%
1.69
30%
4.3
-78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
0.8
1.1
-38%
1.9
-138%
1.8
-125%
1.4
-75%
2.8
-250%
Gamma
2.188 101%
2.24 98%
2.29 96%
2.16 102%
2.199 100%
2.09 105%
CCT
6404 101%
6610 98%
6475 100%
6355 102%
6423 101%
6368 102%
Contrast
999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 226.2 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 226.2 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 226.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9581 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
3913 Points ∼99%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
3300 Points ∼83% -16%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3165 Points ∼80% -19%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3164 Points ∼80% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2766 Points ∼70% -29%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (3476 - 4334, n=4)
3971 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 4160, n=148)
1968 Points ∼50% -50%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
1584 Points ∼100%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
1006 Points ∼64% -36%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
779 Points ∼49% -51%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
889 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
917 Points ∼58% -42%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (1326 - 1604, n=4)
1527 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1604, n=148)
570 Points ∼36% -64%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
2635 Points ∼46%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points ∼56% +22%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
5406 Points ∼94% +105%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5728 Points ∼100% +117%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5485 Points ∼96% +108%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4143 Points ∼72% +57%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (2631 - 3187, n=4)
2892 Points ∼50% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=554)
2268 Points ∼40% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
9833 Points ∼89%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points ∼74% -17%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
9953 Points ∼90% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6771 Points ∼61% -31%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9420 Points ∼85% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
870 Points ∼8% -91%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (9833 - 12112, n=4)
11029 Points ∼100% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=554)
2259 Points ∼20% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
6119 Points ∼73%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points ∼72% -1%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
8386 Points ∼100% +37%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6508 Points ∼78% +6%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8125 Points ∼97% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7076 Points ∼84% +16%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (6119 - 7294, n=4)
6761 Points ∼81% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=555)
2088 Points ∼25% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
3053 Points ∼53%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points ∼60% +12%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
5361 Points ∼94% +76%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5718 Points ∼100% +87%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5468 Points ∼96% +79%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4247 Points ∼74% +39%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (2622 - 3084, n=4)
2923 Points ∼51% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=586)
2184 Points ∼38% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
21465 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points ∼82% -17%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
13419 Points ∼62% -37%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7905 Points ∼36% -63%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12878 Points ∼59% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
11868 Points ∼54% -45%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (20511 - 23094, n=4)
21781 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=586)
3080 Points ∼14% -86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
9173 Points ∼91%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points ∼91% 0%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
10059 Points ∼100% +10%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7286 Points ∼72% -21%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9897 Points ∼98% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8485 Points ∼84% -8%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (8333 - 9173, n=4)
8934 Points ∼89% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=586)
2536 Points ∼25% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
3054 Points ∼61%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points ∼48% -20%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
5035 Points ∼100% +65%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4971 Points ∼99% +63%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4900 Points ∼97% +60%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3993 Points ∼79% +31%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (2975 - 3161, n=3)
3063 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5262, n=634)
2142 Points ∼43% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
7282 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points ∼63% -21%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
9032 Points ∼100% +24%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6465 Points ∼72% -11%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8222 Points ∼91% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8005 Points ∼89% +10%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (6917 - 9612, n=3)
7937 Points ∼88% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=634)
1883 Points ∼21% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
5569 Points ∼73%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points ∼57% -21%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
7678 Points ∼100% +38%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6060 Points ∼79% +9%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7145 Points ∼93% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6544 Points ∼85% +18%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (5344 - 6614, n=3)
5842 Points ∼76% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=635)
1786 Points ∼23% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
3153 Points ∼63%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
4911 Points ∼99% +56%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4975 Points ∼100% +58%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4882 Points ∼98% +55%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4077 Points ∼82% +29%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (3008 - 3153, n=2)
3081 Points ∼62% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=676)
2013 Points ∼40% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
10963 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
12632 Points ∼100% +15%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7499 Points ∼59% -32%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11586 Points ∼92% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
11272 Points ∼89% +3%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (10963 - 13334, n=2)
12149 Points ∼96% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=675)
2497 Points ∼20% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
7072 Points ∼76%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
9361 Points ∼100% +32%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6739 Points ∼72% -5%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8877 Points ∼95% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8097 Points ∼86% +14%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (7072 - 7564, n=2)
7318 Points ∼78% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=678)
2134 Points ∼23% -70%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
319.1 fps ∼99%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps ∼100% +1%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
222 fps ∼69% -30%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼47% -52%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
207 fps ∼64% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
191 fps ∼59% -40%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (314 - 325, n=4)
319 fps ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=818)
47.7 fps ∼15% -85%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
59.3 fps ∼99%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +1%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +1%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (40 - 60, n=4)
54.8 fps ∼91% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=827)
32 fps ∼53% -46%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
174.7 fps ∼99%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps ∼99% 0%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
132 fps ∼75% -24%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
118 fps ∼67% -32%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
127 fps ∼72% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
114 fps ∼65% -35%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (170 - 180, n=4)
176 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=723)
28.3 fps ∼16% -84%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
59.8 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
59 fps ∼98% -1%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (52 - 60, n=4)
57.9 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=731)
23.3 fps ∼39% -61%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
114.2 fps ∼98%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps ∼100% +2%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
93 fps ∼79% -19%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75 fps ∼64% -34%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼75% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
80 fps ∼68% -30%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (106 - 137, n=4)
117 fps ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=586)
22.7 fps ∼19% -80%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
59.6 fps ∼99%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +1%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
52 fps ∼87% -13%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
58 fps ∼97% -3%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (45.4 - 59.6, n=4)
54.3 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=588)
20.2 fps ∼34% -66%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
46.9 fps ∼78%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +28%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
35 fps ∼58% -25%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
23 fps ∼38% -51%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼50% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
27 fps ∼45% -42%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (35.6 - 47.5, n=4)
42.5 fps ∼71% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=346)
11.7 fps ∼20% -75%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
30.1 fps ∼91%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +10%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
22 fps ∼67% -27%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼58% -37%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼61% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
23 fps ∼70% -24%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (30 - 32.9, n=4)
31.1 fps ∼94% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=344)
8.24 fps ∼25% -73%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
57.7 fps ∼96%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +4%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
54 fps ∼90% -6%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
36 fps ∼60% -38%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼78% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
52 fps ∼87% -10%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (40.5 - 58.6, n=4)
52.6 fps ∼88% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=350)
17.4 fps ∼29% -70%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
84.8 fps ∼94%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps ∼97% +3%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
58 fps ∼65% -32%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
50 fps ∼56% -41%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
55 fps ∼61% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
56 fps ∼62% -34%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (84.1 - 106, n=4)
89.9 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=349)
20.1 fps ∼22% -76%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
68.5 fps ∼90%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps ∼96% +7%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
55 fps ∼72% -20%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
44 fps ∼58% -36%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps ∼69% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
49 fps ∼64% -28%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (68.5 - 87.2, n=4)
76.4 fps ∼100% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=511)
15.1 fps ∼20% -78%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
51.5 fps ∼86%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +17%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
52 fps ∼87% +1%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31 fps ∼52% -40%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
46 fps ∼77% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
44 fps ∼73% -15%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (40 - 51.8, n=4)
46.6 fps ∼78% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=515)
13.4 fps ∼22% -74%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
552897 Points ∼89%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192
622888 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
496966 Points ∼80% -10%
OnePlus 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
576457 Points ∼93% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
522516 Points ∼84% -5%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (510245 - 647374, n=4)
569996 Points ∼92% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=139)
326530 Points ∼52% -41%
Basemark GPU 1.2
3840x2160 Metal High Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
50.27 fps ∼99%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (50.3 - 51.5, n=2)
50.9 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (50.3 - 51.5, n=2)
50.9 fps ∼100% +1%
Metal Medium Native (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
136.03 fps ∼99%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (120 - 136, n=2)
128 fps ∼93% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80.8 - 211, n=4)
137 fps ∼100% +1%
1920x1080 Metal Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
168.3 fps ∼100%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (168 - 169, n=2)
169 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (113 - 169, n=4)
147 fps ∼87% -13%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096
92705 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58380 Points ∼63% -37%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73666 Points ∼79% -21%
Average Apple A14 Bionic
  (92533 - 92916, n=3)
92718 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4489 - 107945, n=23)
39427 Points ∼43% -57%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Apple A14 Bionic (158 - 167, n=4)
161 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14)
158.543 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼83% -16%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
69.956 Points ∼43% -56%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
69.825 Points ∼43% -56%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)
69.401 Points ∼43% -56%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
56.102 Points ∼35% -65%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=213)
42.5 Points ∼26% -73%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Apple A14 Bionic (305 - 376, n=4)
350 Points ∼100% +15%
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14)
305.3 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼84% -4%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
121.69 Points ∼35% -60%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)
118.7 Points ∼34% -61%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
116.61 Points ∼33% -62%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
95.185 Points ∼27% -69%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=647)
49.6 Points ∼14% -84%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Apple A14 Bionic (188 - 198, n=4)
194 runs/min ∼100% +1%
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14)
193 runs/min ∼99%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼81% -19%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
71.8 runs/min ∼37% -63%
OnePlus 8T (Chome 86)
71.3 runs/min ∼37% -63%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
64.4 runs/min ∼33% -67%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=194)
44.9 runs/min ∼23% -77%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
41.2 runs/min ∼21% -79%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14)
194 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (191 - 195, n=4)
193 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
123 Points ∼63% -37%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)
108 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
101 Points ∼52% -48%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=284)
71 Points ∼37% -63%
Huawei P40 Pro
Points ∼0% -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Apple A14 Bionic (55710 - 58632, n=4)
57850 Points ∼100% +4%
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14)
55710 Points ∼96%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼84% -12%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
25953 Points ∼45% -53%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
23690 Points ∼41% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
20022 Points ∼35% -64%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)
19915 Points ∼34% -64%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=816)
8273 Points ∼14% -85%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=842)
9571 ms * ∼100% -1974%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
2293.6 ms * ∼24% -397%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
1913.7 ms * ∼20% -315%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)
1860.1 ms * ∼19% -303%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
1853.7 ms * ∼19% -302%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼6% -24%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (460 - 467, n=4)
463 ms * ∼5% -0%
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14)
461.4 ms * ∼5%

* ... smaller is better

0102030405060Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 1.0.0: Ø42.5 (38-45)
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.36.1460240: Ø59.2 (57-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.36.1460240: Ø59.2 (55-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.5.3: Ø58.4 (49-60)
Hög belastning
 34.3 °C35.8 °C36.1 °C 
 36.1 °C36.7 °C36.2 °C 
 36.6 °C37.8 °C35.7 °C 
Max: 37.8 °C
Medel: 36.1 °C
34.4 °C37.1 °C34 °C
35 °C37.3 °C36.3 °C
35.3 °C35.4 °C37.1 °C
Max: 37.3 °C
Medel: 35.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  39.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.838.52537.535.53129.330.44031.931.75037.8356329.127.68019.524.810019.931.512516.539.316014.845.620013.144.325012.545.131510.848.840010.551.150014.857.36301457.880013.457.9100013.561.5125012.163160011.76820001270.6250013.175.4315013.574.1400014.566.4500015.463.9630016.364.9800016.9651000017.866.81250018.461.41600019.251.6SPL71.626.681.1N24.90.843.2median 14median 61.4Delta1.98.435.729.227.628.130.624.324.828.332.735.224.624.923.224.119.23317.943.216.55415.250.217.352.217.254.316.856.614.658.71461.314.760.114.767.814.868.71571.314.971.81573.614.674.31475.515.172.114.671.514.870.115.164.315.155.515.544.72783.40.953.8median 15median 61.30.49.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone 12Apple iPhone 11
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone 12 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.5 / 1.8 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.5 / 10.4 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPhone 12
2815 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
5000 mAh
Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh
OnePlus 8T
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note20
4300 mAh
Average Apple A14 Bionic
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-11%
-3%
20%
2%
3%
-30%
7%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.56
38%
0.63
30%
0.92
-2%
1.1
-22%
0.92
-2%
0.91 (0.64 - 1.3, n=4)
-1%
0.892 (0.2 - 3.4, n=911)
1%
Idle Average *
1.5
2.99
-99%
2.06
-37%
1.41
6%
1.5
-0%
1.5
-0%
3.03 (1.22 - 7.89, n=4)
-102%
1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=910)
-17%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
3.02
-68%
2.08
-16%
1.47
18%
1.7
6%
1.54
14%
3.21 (1.24 - 7.91, n=4)
-78%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=911)
-13%
Load Average *
5.5
4.17
24%
5.55
-1%
3.35
39%
4.6
16%
5.49
-0%
5.31 (3.04 - 9.28, n=4)
3%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=905)
25%
Load Maximum *
10.4
5.44
48%
9.71
7%
6.37
39%
9.4
10%
9.99
4%
7.44 (3.86 - 10.8, n=4)
28%
6.12 (1.2 - 14.2, n=905)
41%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
43tim 22min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15tim 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18tim 55min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 43min
Apple iPhone 12
2815 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS
5000 mAh
Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh
OnePlus 8T
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note20
4300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
-32%
-24%
-16%
-11%
Reader / Idle
2602
2765
6%
1211
-53%
1474
-43%
1539
-41%
2067
-21%
H.264
1135
1147
1%
997
-12%
1137
0%
1103
-3%
1123
-1%
WiFi v1.3
945
866
-8%
677
-28%
743
-21%
1023
8%
589
-38%
Load
283
267
-6%
184
-35%
198
-30%
203
-28%
326
15%

För

+ Väldigt exakt OLED-skärm
+ Hölje av hög kvalitet
+ Kameran tar skarpa foton
+ Bra prestanda
+ Lång batteritid
+ Knappt någon värmeutveckling
+ Exakt positionering
+ Brett utbud av tillbehör
+ Täcker många LTE- och 5G-frekvenser

Emot

- PWM-flimmer
- Medelmåttiga högtalare
- Begränsad lagringskapacitet för sitt pris
- Begränsningar för hur NFC kan användas
- Skärmen har bara 60 Hz bilduppdatering
- Inget stöd för 5G mmWave i Europa

Omdöme - Användbara förbättringar

Recension av Apple iPhone 12
Recension av Apple iPhone 12

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Apples telefoner har förstås alltid haft en unik egenskap såtillvida att de tillverkats av Apple. Men även 2020 har iPhone 12 ett antal nya förbättringar att erbjuda, exempelvis en OLED-skärm, högre prestanda och stöd för 5G.

Inte heller den här gången bryr sig Apple om aktuella standarder för toppskiktstelefoner, vilket är anledningen till att iPhone 12 fortfarande inte har en 90- eller 120 Hz-skärm och att basmodellen har ganska liten mängd lagring. När det kommer till trådlös laddning och IP-certifiering hänger Apples telefon däremot med. 

Faktum att priset på Apples nya telefon återigen har ökat jämfört med föregångaren är ganska irriterande, och då ingår inte ens en AC-adapter eller ett headset. På den sistnämnda punkten går det dock att köpa Apples argument om miljöpåverkan. 

iPhone 12 är ytterligare en smartphone av hög kvalitet med massor av styrka och ett bra hölje. De nya funktionerna är inte direkt revolutionerande, men de är väldigt användbara.

Ser man på den separat imponerar iPhone 12 återigen med utmärkt hantverk och vacker design. Den nya MagSafe-porten kommer troligen snart att innebära massor av nya tredjepartstillbehör, som det brukar vara, och den kan till och med användas för att ladda telefonen.

Apple har släppt en bra uppdatering som kanske inte kan ses som revolutionerande men som är ett logiskt nästa steg som uppfyller den höga standard som Apples köpare är vana vid och förväntar sig.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Apple iPhone 12 - 11/04/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design
89%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
95%
Anslutningar
46 / 70 → 66%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
92%
Spelprestanda
63 / 64 → 98%
Programprestanda
91 / 86 → 100%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
62 / 90 → 69%
Camera
77%
Medel
81%
88%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Apple iPhone 12 - Apple-telefon med 5G (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2020-11-11 (Update: 2020-11-11)