Notebookcheck

Test: Acer Predator Helios 500 (GTX 1070, i9-8950HK) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Benjamin Herzig (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 09/10/2018

Spelenhet för UltraHD. Den här rejäla datorn tar sig an runda två: Vi recenserade den billigare versionen av Acer Predator Helios 500 för ett kort tag sedan - och här kommer uppföljaren. Kan denna dyra toppskikts-version övertyga oss? Få reda på svaret i den här detaljerade recensionen!

Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS (Predator Helios Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-8950HK
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Kärna: 1480 - 1695 MHz, Minne: 2002 MHz, GP104, 388.92, Optimus
Minne
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 2 av 4 platser upptagna, max 128 GB
Skärm
17.3 tum 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixlar 255 PPI, B173ZAN01.0, IPS LED, G-Sync, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Hårddisk
Liteon CA1-8D512, 512 GB 
, m.2 2280 PCIE 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD (WDC WD10SPZX-21Z10T0), 432 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: hörlursanslutning + mikrofonanslutning
Nätverk
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 38.7 x 428 x 298
Batteri
74 Wh, 4800 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 720p
Övrigt
Högtalare: stereo + subwoofer, Tangentbord: 6 raders chiclet med numeriskt tangentbord, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Acer Collection, Acer Care Center, Acer Documents, Acer Quick Access, Acer User Experience Improvement, Killer Control Center, PredatorSense, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
4 kg, Strömförsörjning: 1.115 kg
Pris
3000 Euro

 

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
694 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
686 MBit/s ∼99% +8%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
681 MBit/s ∼98% +7%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
637 MBit/s ∼92%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
593 MBit/s ∼85% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=165)
593 MBit/s ∼85% -7%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
424 MBit/s ∼61% -33%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
640 MBit/s ∼94% 0%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
640 MBit/s ∼94%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
624 MBit/s ∼92% -2%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
604 MBit/s ∼89% -6%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
589 MBit/s ∼86% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=165)
528 MBit/s ∼78% -17%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
506 MBit/s ∼74% -21%
344
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
363
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 367 cd/m² Medel: 349.4 cd/m² Minimum: 19.1 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 370 cd/m²
Kontrast: 796:1 (Svärta: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 3.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 88.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
B173ZAN01.0, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 17.3
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
AUO_B173HAN03, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus G703
AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
AU Optronics B173HW01, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
ID: AUO169D, Name: AU Optronics B173HAN01.6, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Average of class Gaming
 
Screen
-29%
13%
-8%
-1%
1%
-31%
-9%
-45%
Brightness middle
366
335
-8%
240
-34%
274
-25%
343
-6%
343
-6%
365
0%
367.4
0%
285 (118 - 463, n=631)
-22%
Brightness
349
300
-14%
248
-29%
268
-23%
328
-6%
332
-5%
341
-2%
363
4%
Brightness Distribution
86
82
-5%
83
-3%
80
-7%
84
-2%
83
-3%
89
3%
86
0%
Black Level *
0.46
0.7
-52%
0.22
52%
0.29
37%
0.29
37%
0.35
24%
0.32
30%
0.32
30%
0.67 (0.2 - 146, n=653)
-46%
Contrast
796
479
-40%
1091
37%
945
19%
1183
49%
980
23%
1141
43%
1148
44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.9
4.99
-72%
2.14
26%
3.99
-38%
4.01
-38%
3.35
-16%
6.51
-124%
3.8
-31%
5.69 (1.29 - 12.9, n=374)
-96%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.4
9.32
-73%
5.04
7%
7.33
-36%
6.03
-12%
5.62
-4%
12.32
-128%
10.4
-93%
9.86 (2.04 - 28.7, n=225)
-83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.1
1.93
38%
1.54
50%
1.79
42%
2.5
19%
2.9
6%
2.91 (1.25 - 6.51, n=45)
6%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.5
5.2
-49%
1.62
54%
4.14
-18%
4.7
-34%
2.4
31%
7.65
-119%
3.5
-0%
5.83 (0.64 - 98, n=375)
-67%
Gamma
2.37 93%
2.49 88%
2.28 96%
2.58 85%
2.4 92%
2.35 94%
2.64 83%
2.18 101%
2.36 93% (1.57 - 3.71, n=376)
CCT
6616 98%
7719 84%
6846 95%
7352 88%
6451 101%
6495 100%
8066 81%
6467 101%
8091 80% (1136 - 19530, n=376)
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88.1
59
-33%
77
-13%
60
-32%
88
0%
57
-35%
56
-36%
58.1
-34%
58.3 (34.3 - 91, n=369)
-34%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
91
-9%
100
0%
92
-8%
100
0%
88
-12%
86
-14%
89.3
-11%
86 (54.8 - 100, n=268)
-14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 10.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8946 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points ∼99% +4%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
Intel Core i9-8950HK
198 Points ∼96%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
185 Points ∼89% -7%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points ∼84% -13%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points ∼84% -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (130 - 202, n=56)
164 Points ∼79% -17%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
162 Points ∼78% -18%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼77% -19%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
157 Points ∼76% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 207, n=403)
151 Points ∼73% -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points ∼44% +20%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1148 Points ∼37%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
Intel Core i7-8750H
1007 Points ∼32% -12%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
932 Points ∼30% -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (635 - 1265, n=57)
836 Points ∼27% -27%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
807 Points ∼26% -30%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
770 Points ∼25% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1408, n=404)
734 Points ∼24% -36%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼24% -36%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼24% -36%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
41678 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6836 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7460
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
32438
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6838
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
9576 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.24 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
87.14 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
11.37 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.37 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
88.04 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
1.99 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
198 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1148 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
135.51 fps
Hjälp
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
5944 Points ∼100% +22%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5720 Points ∼96% +17%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
5431 Points ∼91% +11%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5221 Points ∼88% +7%
Average Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (4882 - 5541, n=3)
5178 Points ∼87% +6%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
4882 Points ∼82%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4395 Points ∼74% -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
4253 Points ∼72% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=318)
4211 Points ∼71% -14%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
4207 Points ∼71% -14%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4882 poäng
Hjälp
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
Average Liteon CA1-8D512
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
146%
211%
82%
-53%
13%
17%
0%
Write 4K
95
111.8
18%
160.7
69%
148.8
57%
61.88
-35%
155.1
63%
79.18
-17%
95
0%
Read 4K
37.56
42.09
12%
54.82
46%
46.64
24%
22.78
-39%
44.22
18%
39.69
6%
37.6
0%
Write Seq
484.1
2288
373%
2738
466%
1216
151%
136.1
-72%
311.2
-36%
949.6
96%
484
0%
Read Seq
1001
3321
232%
3346
234%
1461
46%
490.1
-51%
1247
25%
1087
9%
1001
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
278.2
308.3
11%
612.4
120%
444
60%
136.2
-51%
310.3
12%
189.6
-32%
278
0%
Read 4K Q32T1
346.3
364.9
5%
708.7
105%
535
54%
208.4
-40%
551.2
59%
304
-12%
346
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
489
2440
399%
3082
530%
1210
147%
136
-72%
311.5
-36%
947.7
94%
489
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
1586
3485
120%
3505
121%
3450
118%
553.1
-65%
1560
-2%
1488
-6%
1586
0%
Liteon CA1-8D512
Sequential Read: 990.5 MB/s
Sequential Write: 490.9 MB/s
512K Read: 865.5 MB/s
512K Write: 447.2 MB/s
4K Read: 35.77 MB/s
4K Write: 90.06 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 418.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 299.1 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
29109 Points ∼100% +32%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK
28918 Points ∼99% +31%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
27109 Points ∼93% +23%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22510 Points ∼77% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (13760 - 25604, n=58)
22405 Points ∼77% +2%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK
22017 Points ∼76%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
13668 Points ∼47% -38%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=506)
11814 Points ∼41% -46%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i5-8300H
9147 Points ∼31% -58%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
22160 Points ∼100% +31%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK
21422 Points ∼97% +27%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
20307 Points ∼92% +20%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
17649 Points ∼80% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (15718 - 19059, n=56)
17228 Points ∼78% +2%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK
16873 Points ∼76%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
16847 Points ∼76% 0%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
11049 Points ∼50% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=433)
10244 Points ∼46% -39%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i5-8300H
7610 Points ∼34% -55%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
143992 Points ∼100% +45%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK
140768 Points ∼98% +41%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK
99587 Points ∼69%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (64973 - 125922, n=51)
99208 Points ∼69% 0%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
94246 Points ∼65% -5%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
88432 Points ∼61% -11%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
77354 Points ∼54% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=424)
61859 Points ∼43% -38%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i5-8300H
51038 Points ∼35% -49%
3DMark 06 Standard
40048 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
18687 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34455 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14734 poäng
Hjälp
låg med. hög ultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 259185.5111.26340.4fps
Doom (2016) 147.4143.2126.8121.355.9fps
Civilization VI (2016) 128.8106.991.389.380fps
Rocket League (2017) 202.8fps
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 248.7214.6136.9111.847.8fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 179.5157.2134.898.531.6fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
29.4 / 29.4 / 30.1 dB(A)
Hårddisk
30.3 dB(A)
Hög belastning
36 / 42.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 29.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.726.728.726.929.126.92527.428.125.327.427.427.23126.52627.728.326.327.44026.325.728.525.725.625.85026.728.726.825.22525.26324.524.322.524.625.524.7802424.524.522.623.42510026.224.824.523.323.125.312525.223.322.423.321.123.816024.826.222.42220.923.820025.926.122.922.620.325.325025.925.925.320.719.926.13152724.822.220.719.725.240028.12623.120.219.726.250032.330.325.920.319.730.363031.729.324.920.219.530.48003027.723.420.219.628.3100029.127.323.819.719.129125033.430.725.419.517.931.2160032.730.325.318.917.731.2200031.629.124.618.117.130.5250031.228.723.217.216.530.6315031.228.121.616.616.430.3400028.824.619.615.915.626.950002723.819.215.515.425.8630024.821.21715.315.122.8800023.219.8161515.221.1100002017.215.214.714.818.31250016.715.514.814.514.515.9160001615.515.514.314.215.6SPL42.239.634.830.129.440.9N3.93.22.11.31.23.5median 27Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LSmedian 26median 22.9median 19.5median 17.9median 26.1Delta33.12.62.51.93.237.339.736.336.437.437.335.136.234.333.635.335.134.233.232313134.23233.432.73229.53232.332.630.931.331.132.332.633.131.93335.932.630.730.829.930.629.330.735.538.430.831.227.835.527.930.426.628.625.127.929.631.126.92625.829.63031.426.726.326.73032.133.326.824.42332.133.934.827.123.723.933.932.233.425.922.22132.230.631.624.42221.230.63131.92421.220.43132.633.224.420.719.432.634.735.226.219.518.334.735.836.22718.817.935.834.835.826.218.317.134.834.835.524.917.917.334.833.834.322.417.71733.832.233.520.517.616.932.229.430.619.317.616.929.427.929.318.617.616.727.925.126.717.917.516.825.122.523.817.617.616.822.520.82217.617.616.720.819.22017.617.616.919.218.819.61817.81718.844.445.235.631.230.444.44.54.82.11.41.34.5median 31Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BYmedian 31.9median 24.4median 18.8median 17.9median 313.83.33.73.43.13.8hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
 39.6 °C41 °C36.5 °C 
 33.4 °C35.4 °C34.8 °C 
 24.5 °C27.3 °C26.9 °C 
Max: 41 °C
Medel: 33.3 °C
45.2 °C36.3 °C38.8 °C
38.2 °C28.7 °C27.7 °C
25.1 °C25.2 °C26.4 °C
Max: 45.2 °C
Medel: 32.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  42 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.637.441.6254135.3413141.13141.14041.629.541.65042.631.142.66344.535.944.58045.829.345.810049.727.849.712550.725.150.716052.625.852.620055.726.755.725059.42359.431565.223.965.240062.72162.750061.121.261.163063.820.463.880061.319.461.3100061.518.361.512506117.961160066.317.166.3200063.917.363.9250060.31760.3315057.616.957.6400060.416.960.4500060.416.760.4630066.816.866.8800063.216.863.21000058.916.758.91250054.116.954.11600052.51752.5SPL74.730.474.7N351.335median 60.4Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BYmedian 17.9median 60.4Delta3.23.13.243.442.537.237.3303835.538.427.136.327.338.327.247.328.253.225.154.322.464.223.370.42273.920.676.718.877.919.372.318.363.717.866.918.371.817.681.217.184.417.285.917.183.717.179.517.272.717.180.61779.417.177.117.170.717.26516.966.429.892.71.394.7median 17.6MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titanmedian 72.71.96.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.72 / 0.79 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 24.6 / 33.1 / 37.2 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 124 / 236.5 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
2tim 52min

För

+ ljusstark UltraHD-skärm med väldigt bra färgrymdstäckning
+ framtidssäkrad RAM-konfiguration
+ bakgrundsbelysning som går att ställa in i detalj
+ 2 st USB Typ C Thunderbolt 3
+ behändig portplacering
+ utmärkta servicemöjligheter
+ skapligt ljudsystem
+ bra inmatningsenheter
+ jämförelsevis lätt för sin klass
+ tyst vid kontorsarbete, acceptabel vid spel
+ makroknappar

Emot

- Core i9 kan inte nå sin fullständiga prestandapotential
- okonventionellt tangentbordsupplägg
- dålig batteritid
- väldigt hög energiförbrukning vid tomgång
- dåliga material och dålig stabilitet för priset
- prestandan minskar markant vid batteridrift
Acer Predator Helios 500, recensionsex från Acer.
Acer Predator Helios 500, recensionsex från Acer.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på enhär.

Föga överraskande: Acer Predator Helios 500 i en 4K-version med Intel Core i9-8950HK är även den en utmärkt spelenhet då den fortfarande har de flesta fördelar som den billigare versionen ha. Men i vårt tycke är den billigare i7-modellen ett bättre val. Intel Core i9-8950HK-processorn kan knappt dra nytta av sin högre prestanda och dessutom orsakar den högre temperaturer och – tillsammans med 4K-skärmen – högre energiförbrukning. När det kommer till skärmen: UltraHD-skärmen är definitivt en givande uppgradering, som möjliggör spelande i 4K tillsammans med ett GeForce GTX 1070. Skärmens kvalitet övertygar, särskilt den höga färgrymdstäckningen. Å andra sidan har FullHD-skärmen högre bilduppdateringsfrekvens, så båda skärmalternativen har sina för och nackdelar.

4K på topp, Core i9 är en flopp: Även om dess 4K LCD ger stora fördelar åt många användare så är Core i9-processorn till stor del ett slöseri med pengar.

Sammanfattningsvis kan vi rekommendera 4K-skärmen, men Core i9-8950HK-processorn är inte värd det högre priset – det är bara när det kommer till enkelkärnig prestanda som den briljerar, vilket inte är särskilt viktigt för spel. 

Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS - 09/03/2018 v6
Benjamin Herzig

Design
71 / 98 → 73%
Tangentbord
87%
Mus
83%
Anslutningar
70 / 81 → 86%
Vikt
50 / 10-66 → 71%
Batteri
68%
Skärm
91%
Spelprestanda
94%
Programprestanda
93%
Temperatur
89 / 95 → 93%
Ljudnivå
92 / 90 → 100%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Medel
77%
88%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Acer Predator Helios 500 (GTX 1070, i9-8950HK) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Benjamin Herzig, 2018-09-10 (Update: 2018-09-10)