Recension av Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16: En ovanlig bärbar dator med bra batteritid

Name: Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
Brand: Asus

Dynamisk duo. En Ryzen 9-6900HX APU och en GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU återger alla aktuella spel smidigt på den matta 4k-skärmen (IPS, DCI P3, FreeSync) i 16:10-format. Detta åtföljs av 4 TB lagringsutrymme (RAID 0), 64 GB arbetsminne och en överraskande bra batteritid.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/24/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Touchscreen Windows

Med Zephyrus Duo 16 presenterar Asus en bärbar dator för spelare, streamers och innehållsskapare, vars mest slående egenskap är omedelbart uppenbar: Den mest utmärkande egenskapen är den som är tydligast på första parkett: ovanför tangentbordet finns en andra skärm med pekskärmsfunktion (Screenpad Plus). Bland konkurrenterna finns enheter som t.ex Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model, denGigabyte Aero 16 YE5, denMSI GE76 Raider, denMedion Erazer Beast X30och Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021.

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX (ROG Zephyrus Duo Serie)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.9 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1395 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, 165 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 30.0.15.1259, Optimus

Minne

64 GB

, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Skärm

16.00 tum 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixlar 283 PPI, BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS level, FreeSync Premium, Pantone Validated, (second screen: 14 in, 3840 x 1100 pixels, IPS level, capacitive, stylus support), glansig: nej, HDR, 120 Hz

Moderkort

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Hårddisk

2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0), 4096 GB

, 3620 GB ledigt

Ljudkort

Realtek ALC285

Anslutningar

4 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: combined audio port, Kortläsare: MicroSD, TPM 2.0

Nätverk

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 20.5 x 355 x 266

Batteri

90 Wh, 5845 mAh Litiumpolymer, 4 cells

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webbkamera: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: 6 speakers, Tangentbord: chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, palm rest, Microsoft 365 (trial), Microsoft OneNote (trial), 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.56 kg, Strömförsörjning: 850 g

Pris

4999 Euro

Länkar

Asus hemsida
Asus kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Jämförelse med potentiella konkurrenter

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.2 %	05/2022	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	20.5 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
92.5 %	11/2021	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU	2.2 kg	16.8 mm	16.20"	3456x2234
88.3 %	05/2022	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	16.99 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
87.5 %	01/2022	MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3 kg	26 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.7 %	05/2022	Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	23 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
84.7 %	03/2022	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	22.4 mm	16.00"	3840x2400

Hölje - GX650 har ett robust metallhölje

Det mattsvarta metallfodralet har ett bra utförande. Det finns inga uppenbara luckor och inga märkbara skarpa kanter. En annan positiv punkt är att basenheten inte kan skeva. Å andra sidan skulle locket kunna behöva lite mer styvhet. Gångjärnen klarar av att hålla locket stadigt på plats. Den maximala öppningsvinkeln är cirka 130 grader och du kan öppna locket med en hand

När du öppnar displaylocket höjs Screenpad, en andra display med pekskärmsfunktionalitet, med en fast vinkel på cirka 15 grader mot användaren. Dessutom flyttas den med cirka 2 cm mot huvudskärmen. Den resulterande luckan visar en genomskinlig plastplatta som på vissa ställen ger en glimt av fodralets insida. Att Screenpad höjs har inte bara ergonomiska skäl, utan det finns också ventilationsöppningar under skärmen för att möjliggöra luftflöde in i fodralet.

Zephyrus är en av de tyngre bärbara datorerna i vår jämförelse. Endast MSI GE76 Raiderär tyngre. Dimensionerna blir också något större än jämförbara bärbara 16-tumsdatorer som t.ex MacBook Pro 16.

Storleksjämförelse

MSI GE76 Raider Medion Erazer Beast X30 Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 DIN A4 ❌

Utrustning - Zephyrus erbjuder inte Thunderbolt 4

Alla fyra USB-anslutningar (2x USB-A, 2x USB-C) stöder standarden USB 3.2 Gen 2. En av de två USB-C-portarna erbjuder Power Delivery och båda portarna stöder DisplayPort via USB-C. Med detta erbjuder den bärbara datorn tre videoutgångsportar tillsammans med HDMI 2.1-anslutningen. Anslutningarna kompletteras av en kombinerad ljudport och en Gigabit Ethernet-port.

Vänster sida: ström, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery, G-Sync), kortläsare för lagring (MicroSD), ljudkombination

Höger sida: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort)

Baksidan: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI 2.1

SD-kortläsare

MicroSD-kortläsaren är en av de snabba modellerna med maximala överföringshastigheter på 155 MB/s (överföring av 250 jpg-bildfiler på cirka 5 MB vardera) och 185 MB/s (kopiering av stora datablock) med vårt referenslagringskort AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	155 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	155 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)	98.4 MB/s -37%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	79.9 MB/s -48%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	66 MB/s -57%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	185 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)	121.3 MB/s -34%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	83 MB/s -55%

Kommunikation

Överföringshastigheten för WLAN-överföringen under optimala förhållanden (utan ytterligare WLAN-enheter i närheten och med den bärbara datorn och serverdatorn nära varandra) är utmärkt och motsvarar kapaciteten hos WiFi-chipet (Mediatek MT7922; 802.11 ax, WiFi 6E). Trådbundna nätverksanslutningar hanteras av ett Gigabit Ethernet-chip (RTL8125) från Realtek.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1695 (1556^min - 1768^max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1621 (1412^min - 1672^max) MBit/s -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1503 (1451^min - 1558^max) MBit/s -11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1333 (1044^min - 1390^max) MBit/s -21%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (358 - 1785, n=38)	1328 MBit/s -22%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)	1272 MBit/s -25%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1727 (866^min - 1759^max) MBit/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1721 (1500^min - 1744^max) MBit/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1692 (1567^min - 1738^max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (848 - 1775, n=38)	1435 MBit/s -15%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)	1403 MBit/s -17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1030 (752^min - 1313^max) MBit/s -39%

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1691 (1567-1738)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1697 (866-1759)

Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1721 (1500-1744)

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1029 (752-1313)

MSI GE76 Raider Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1117 (588-1235)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1695 (1556-1768)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1621 (1412-1672)

Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1503 (1451-1558)

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1333 (1044-1390)

MSI GE76 Raider Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1235 (650-1337)

Webbkamera

Zephyrus webbkamera på 0,9 MP ger bilder med en maximal upplösning på 1280 x 720 pixlar. Den saknar färgprecision och färgerna avviker avsevärt från målet. Kameran har inget mekaniskt skydd.

ColorChecker Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX: 15.96 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 27.32 ∆E

Tillbehör

Förutom den vanliga dokumentationen (snabbstartmanual och garantiinformation) ingår även ett handflatsstöd i gummi i den bärbara datorn.

Underhåll

För att ta bort botten av fodralet måste du först ta bort skruvarna i botten. Men du måste vara uppmärksam, eftersom en av skruvarna i mitten av fodralet är täckt av en liten gummiplatta. Baksidan av fodralet hålls också på plats av några klämmor som kan lossas genom att man vickar försiktigt eller med hjälp av ett platt plockverktyg. Efter att ha avlägsnat fallets botten får du tillgång till arbetsminnesbankerna (båda upptagna), de två SSD-enheterna (PCIe 4), fläktarna och batteriet.

Garanti

Asus erbjuder en tvåårig garanti på Zephyrus. En förlängning av garantin till 3 år kostar 129 euro (~136 dollar) extra.

Inmatningsenheter - En andra skärm för den bärbara datorn från Asus

Tangentbord

Tangentbordet är endast bekvämt att skriva om du använder det medföljande handledsstödet av gummi (djup: ~5,5 cm, 2,2 tum, vinklat). Även om det gör ett ganska bra jobb fungerar det egentligen bara på en fast yta. De släta tangenterna på det upplysta chiclet-tangentbordet har en kort slaglängd och en tydlig tryckpunkt. Tangentmotståndet är okej och tangentbordet böjer sig inte när du skriver. Den trestegs RGB-belysningen styrs via en funktionstangent. Sammantaget levererar Asus här ett tangentbord som är lämpligt för vardagliga uppgifter.

Pekplatta

En multitouch-kapabel Clickpad (~5,8 x 9,6 cm, ~2,3 x 3,8 tum) i stående läge ersätter musen. Den släta ytan underlättar för fingrarna att glida. Padden har en kort slaglängd och en tydlig tryckpunkt. Genom att trycka på motsvarande symbol på plattan visas en sifferplatta.

Asus Screenpad Plus

Det finns ytterligare ett inmatningsalternativ i form av Screenpad Plus (14 tum, 3840 x 1100 pixlar, matt), som är en andra skärm med pekskärmsfunktionalitet (stöd för aktiva inmatningspennor). Den beter sig som vilken annan inkopplad extern skärm som helst och kan slås på och stängas av via en separat tangent.

Screenpad ger möjlighet att flytta program eller deras navigeringselement till pekskärmen. Det senare beror på om programmet stöder detta. Vi kan till exempel flytta chattfönstret till skärmplattan medan ett spel körs på huvudskärmen.

Det finns flera små förinstallerade appar som ger en bild av Screenpads möjligheter. Det finns till exempel en miniräknare och ett fält för inmatning av handskrift, och ett Quick Key-program samlar ofta använda funktioner som klippa, kopiera och klistra in.

Skärm - Bra färgåtergivning

Ljusstyrkan (433,9 cd/m²) och kontrasten (1043:1) på den matta 16-tumsskärmen (3840 x 2400 pixlar) uppfyller kraven. Positiva punkter är de snabba svarstiderna och avsaknaden av PWM-flimmer.

Skärmen stöder AMD:s FreeSync-teknik, som dynamiskt anpassar skärmens uppdateringsfrekvens och GPU:ns bildfrekvens till varandra. På så sätt ska den skapade bilden vara så jämn som möjligt, särskilt under datorspel.


464 cd/m²	431 cd/m²	430 cd/m²
426 cd/m²	459 cd/m²	409 cd/m²
442 cd/m²	432 cd/m²	412 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

BOE NE160QAM-NX1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 464 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 433.9 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 459 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1043:1 (Svärta: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
86.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.235

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16.00	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI GE76 Raider AU Optronics B173HAN05.4 (AUOE295), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30	Medion Erazer Beast X30 BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Samsung SDC416B, AMOLED, 3840x2400, 16.00
Display			-23%	-22%	-18%
Display P3 Coverage	98		65.3 -33%	63.1 -36%	67.7 -31%
sRGB Coverage	99.9		85.1 -15%	94 -6%	97.6 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	86.3		67.4 -22%	65.2 -24%	69.2 -20%
Response Times			-9%	-5%	-26%	74%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14.6 ?(6.7, 7.9)		4.3 ?(2.4, 1.9) 71%	5.6 ?(2, 3.6) 62%	14.7 ?(7, 7.7) -1%	2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2) 84%
Response Time Black / White *	5.6 ?(2, 3.6)		10.5 ?(5.7, 4.8) -88%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) -71%	8.4 ?(3.2, 5.2) -50%	2 ?(1, 1) 64%
PWM Frequency						60 ?(58)
Screen		329%	27%	20%	3%	456%
Brightness middle	459	507 10%	330 -28%	290 -37%	377 -18%	368 -20%
Brightness	434	494 14%	315 -27%	290 -33%	352 -19%	368 -15%
Brightness Distribution	88	96 9%	89 1%	96 9%	86 -2%	93 6%
Black Level *	0.44	0.02 95%	0.24 45%	0.23 48%	0.32 27%	0.01 98%
Contrast	1043	25350 2330%	1375 32%	1261 21%	1178 13%	36800 3428%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.97	1.4 53%	1.47 51%	1.59 46%	2.91 2%	2.33 22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.13	2.8 66%	2.73 66%	3.17 61%	6.78 17%	4.34 47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.03		0.63 39%	0.87 16%	1.3 -26%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.9	2.3 53%	1.8 63%	2.5 49%	3.4 31%	0.8 84%
Gamma	2.235 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.282 ^96%	2.253 ^98%	2.109 ^104%	2.119 ^104%
CCT	6775 ^96%	6792 ^96%	6499 ^100%	6640 ^98%	7273 ^89%	6569 ^99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		329% / 329%	-2% / 11%	-2% / 8%	-14% / -6%	265% / 380%

* ... smaller is better

Skärmens X Rite Pantone-certifiering garanterar en mycket naturlig färgåtergivning. På motsvarande sätt är färgvisningen ganska exakt redan i leveransstadiet. Även om färgavvikelsen håller sig inom målgränserna ger en kalibrering ändå betydande förbättringar. Skärmen kan visa sRGB- (99,9 %) och DCI-P3- (98 %) färgrymderna nästan helt och hållet, och 86 % av AdobeRGB-färgrymderna täcks också.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.7 ms rise
14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

IPS-panelens betraktningsvinklar är stabila och den kan läsas från alla vinklar. Skärmen kan läsas utomhus om solljuset inte är för starkt.

Föreställning - Rembrandt möter Ampere

Med Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX erbjuder Asus en 16-tums bärbar dator som i första hand är avsedd för spel. Enheten är dock även inriktad på streamers och innehållsskapare.

Testvillkor

Den bärbara datorn erbjuder tre tillverkarspecifika prestandaprofiler ("Silent", "Performance" och "Turbo") och du kan växla mellan dem med hjälp av tangentkombinationen "Fn" + "F5". Profilen "Turbo" kan endast användas vid nätdrift. Våra batteritester utfördes med profilen "Silent" och alla benchmarks med profilen "Performance" aktiverad.

	Prestanda	Turbo	Silent
Effektbegränsning 1	80 Watt	100 Watt	70 Watt
Effektgräns 2	80 Watt	125 Watt	70 Watt

Med den förinstallerade Armoury Crate-programvaran kan du skapa individuella profiler ("Manual"). Vi konfigurerade till exempel CPU:ns effektgränser och GPU:ns dynamiska boost individuellt. Du kan också överklocka grafiklagret.

Processor

CPU-segmentet i Ryzen 9-6900HXaPU (Rembrandt) består av en octa-core-processor som körs med en grundläggande klockfrekvens på 3,3 GHz. Hastigheten kan ökas upp till 4,9 GHz via Turbo. Simultan multitrådning (två trådar per kärna) stöds.

Flertrådstestet i riktmärket Cinebench R15 körs kortfattat vid klockfrekvenser mellan 4 och 4,4 GHz och enkeltrådstestet mellan 3,1 och 4,7 GHz. Vid batteridrift körs processorn på 3 till 4,1 GHz (multitråd) och 2 till 4,7 GHz (enkeltråd).

Vi utvärderar om CPU Turbo används konstant i nätdrift genom att köra multitrådstestet i Cinebench R15 benchmark i minst 30 minuter i en konstant slinga. Turbo används på en hög nivå. Genom att använda prestandaprofilen "Turbo" kan klockfrekvensen ökas ännu något högre.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2247 (2222.47-2257.72)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max; Rosetta 2: Ø1687 (1667.29-1693.05)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø1535 (1448.91-1565.5)

MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2722 (2660.99-2908.88)

Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2761 (2697.24-2854.49)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX; Leise: Ø2069 (2039.36-2194.43)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX; Turbo: Ø2369 (2355.85-2411.64)

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2616 (2562.79-2779.9)

CPU:s klockfrekvenser när CB15-slingan körs

CPU:s klockfrekvenser när CB15-slingan körs (Turbo)

CPU:s klockfrekvenser när CB15-slingan körs (tyst)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2292 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

158.6 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

249 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	81.6 pt
Average of class Gaming	80.3 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	79.8 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	74.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	69 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	66.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	65.6 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max ^-5! Apple M1 Max	64.4 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	63.3 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	59 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years)	19581 Points +39%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	18935 Points +34%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	18288 Points +30%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	18106 Points +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	15100 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14085 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	13966 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (9709 - 15100, n=19)	13307 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	12385 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	9777 Points -31%
Single Core
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1940 Points +24%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	1909 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years)	1816 Points +16%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1799 Points +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1659 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	1576 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	1570 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1566 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1516 - 1616, n=19)	1565 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	1530 Points -2%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)	7442 Points +36%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	7203 Points +31%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	6941 Points +26%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	6849 Points +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	5813 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5489 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	5403 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (3742 - 5813, n=19)	5162 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	3741 Points -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	2735 Points -50%
CPU (Single Core)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	734 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)	699 Points +17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	695 Points +17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	685 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	612 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	610 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (595 - 631, n=19)	610 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	596 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	595 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	390 Points -34%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years)	3101 Points +35%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	2909 (2660.99^min - 2908.88^max) Points +27%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	2854 Points +25%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	2780 Points +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	2411 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2292 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	2194 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1588 - 2411, n=19)	2163 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max (Rosetta 2)	1693 (1667^min - 1693^max) Points -26%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1566 (1448.91^min - 1565.5^max) Points -32%
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	279 Points +12%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	275 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years)	268 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	253 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (241 - 261, n=19)	250 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	249 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	249 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	242 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	240 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max (Rosetta 2)	197 Points -21%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	306 Seconds * -39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	242 Seconds * -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (212 - 357, n=21)	239 Seconds * -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	220 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	212 Seconds * +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	200 Seconds * +9%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)	198.9 Seconds * +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max (Blender 3.0 beta for mac)	189 Seconds * +14%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	181 Seconds * +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	175.8 Seconds * +20%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years)	77274 MIPS +20%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	73485 MIPS +14%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	72836 MIPS +13%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	68520 MIPS +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	65336 MIPS +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	64457 MIPS
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	63706 MIPS -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (49526 - 65336, n=20)	60091 MIPS -7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	44553 MIPS -31%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	6186 MIPS +8%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	6144 MIPS +7%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years)	6133 MIPS +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	5920 MIPS +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5892 MIPS +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	5813 MIPS +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5090 - 6070, n=20)	5799 MIPS +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5727 MIPS
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	5257 MIPS -8%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	13865 Points +36%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	13648 Points +34%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)	13627 Points +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	12708 Points +25%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	12559 Points +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	10490 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10167 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	10071 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (8313 - 10490, n=21)	9642 Points -5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	9607 Points -6%
Single-Core
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	1918 Points +20%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1870 Points +17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1842 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years)	1811 Points +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	1782 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	1604 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1596 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1594 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1523 - 1652, n=21)	1589 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	1523 Points -4%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years)	21.3 fps +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	20.5 fps +14%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	19.9 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	18.7 fps +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	18.1 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	18 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	17.6 fps -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (12.6 - 18.7, n=20)	16.7 fps -7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	11.7 fps -35%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (44.8 - 81.7, n=20)	53.1 s * -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	49.5 s * -10%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)	49.1 s * -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	45.2 s * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	45 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	44.8 s * -0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	42.9 s * +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	39 s * +13%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	38.9 s * +14%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4936 sec * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.4627 - 0.4974, n=20)	0.483 sec * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	0.4808 sec * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4799 sec *
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	0.4742 sec * +1%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years)	0.4687 sec * +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	0.4522 sec * +6%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4252 sec * +11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4155 sec * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating | AIDA64

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	92.6 pt
Average of class Gaming	92.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	89 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	87.6 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	82.3 pt
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	68.7 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	68.6 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	64.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	49.7 pt

AIDA64
FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years)	18634 KRay/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	17963 KRay/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	16852 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	16192 KRay/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (10950 - 17963, n=20)	15327 KRay/s -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	9405 KRay/s -44%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	9065 KRay/s -46%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	8265 KRay/s -51%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	5839 KRay/s -65%
FPU Julia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	110797 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	103794 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	101849 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (71414 - 110797, n=20)	96546 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years)	93571 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	42843 Points -59%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	40570 Points -61%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	38277 Points -63%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	27801 Points -73%
CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years)	4332 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	3804 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3547 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	3480 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3354 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (2471 - 3804, n=20)	3301 MB/s -7%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3178 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	2931 MB/s -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	2013 MB/s -43%
CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years)	109573 Points +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	107042 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	107007 Points +2%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	106414 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	106369 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	104920 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	104649 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (84185 - 107544, n=20)	100656 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	85965 Points -18%
FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	13062 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	12957 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	12955 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (10970 - 13205, n=20)	12630 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years)	12203 Points -6%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	10237 Points -21%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	10226 Points -21%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	9655 Points -25%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	7027 Points -46%
FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	61370 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57334 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	56121 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (39164 - 61370, n=20)	52842 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years)	47882 Points -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	26859 Points -53%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	24693 Points -57%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	22873 Points -60%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	15765 Points -73%
CPU AES
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	140776 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	139407 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	137667 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (54613 - 142360, n=20)	115891 MB/s -17%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years)	107712 MB/s -23%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	100062 MB/s -28%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	91041 MB/s -35%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	67814 MB/s -51%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65871 MB/s -53%
CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years)	1213 MB/s +36%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	1174 MB/s +32%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	1085 MB/s +22%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	988 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	911 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	890 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	863 MB/s -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (578 - 911, n=20)	803 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	701 MB/s -21%
FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years)	10089 KRay/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	9540 KRay/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	9001 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	8759 KRay/s -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5798 - 9540, n=20)	8175 KRay/s -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	5596 KRay/s -38%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	5239 KRay/s -42%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	4776 KRay/s -47%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3257 KRay/s -64%
CPU PhotoWorxx
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	40095 MPixel/s +35%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	40000 MPixel/s +35%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	39666 MPixel/s +34%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	38990 MPixel/s +31%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years)	36818 MPixel/s +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)	29975 MPixel/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)	29894 MPixel/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	29705 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (26873 - 30604, n=20)	29389 MPixel/s -1%

Systemets prestanda

Det smidigt fungerande systemet har tillräcklig prestanda för spel, videoredigering och rendering under de närmaste åren. Överföringshastigheterna för det inbyggda arbetsminnet ligger under värdena för jämförbara bärbara datorer som är utrustade med DDR5-4800-lagring. Detta åtföljs av mycket goda PC-Mark-resultat.

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4418 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5798 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4622 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		6351 poäng
Hjälp

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8007 Points +26%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	7816 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)	7592 Points +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7313 Points +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7149 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	6351 Points

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	10945 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)	10731 Points +14%
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10688 Points +14%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10597 Points +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9870 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	9374 Points

PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10100 Points +31%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	10050 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)	9725 Points +26%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9675 Points +26%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9173 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	7704 Points

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	12905 Points +34%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	11777 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)	11476 Points +19%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10951 Points +14%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10351 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	9626 Points

CrossMark / Overall
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	2113 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years)	1881 Points +10%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1768 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1727 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1711 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	1586 Points -7%

CrossMark / Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	2031 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years)	1791 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1719 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1698 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1585 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	1361 Points -20%

CrossMark / Creativity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	2161 Points +25%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	2102 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years)	2046 Points +19%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1985 Points +15%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1868 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1724 Points

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	2228 Points +30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1715 Points
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years)	1704 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1633 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1471 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	1080 Points -37%

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	62554 MB/s +18%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	62419 MB/s +17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	61946 MB/s +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	61605 MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years)	59453 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	53162 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (47938 - 53345, n=20)	50405 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65865 MB/s +24%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65835 MB/s +23%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65452 MB/s +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65277 MB/s +22%
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years)	63375 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	53321 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (43892 - 53321, n=20)	51062 MB/s -4%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65772 MB/s +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	65159 MB/s +14%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	64282 MB/s +12%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	61981 MB/s +8%
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years)	61670 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	57180 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (51085 - 57202, n=20)	55188 MB/s -3%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	95.2 ns * -3%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	92.6 ns * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	92.3 ns *
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	89.7 ns * +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (80.7 - 120.6, n=20)	88.7 ns * +4%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years)	87.3 ns * +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

Det standardiserade Latency Monitor-testet (webbsurfning, 4k-videoåtergivning, Prime95 hög belastning) avslöjade några tydliga fördröjningar i DPC-latenserna. Systemet verkar inte vara lämpat för video- och ljudbearbetning i realtid. Framtida mjukvaruuppdateringar kan dock leda till vissa förbättringar eller till och med göra saker och ting sämre.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4836 μs * -827%
MSI GE76 Raider GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1642 μs * -215%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	879.6 μs * -69%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT	623 μs * -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	521.5 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Lösning för lagring

Två PCIe 4 SSD-enheter (M.2-2280) med en lagringskapacitet på 2 TB kombineras i en RAID 0-array, så att operativsystemet ser de två SSD-enheterna som en enda SSD-enhet på 4 TB. Alla data som ska lagras fördelas på båda SSD-enheterna. De höga överföringshastigheterna och korta laddningstiderna som blir resultatet är optimala för spel.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 9490 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 10135 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 563.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 412 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 5266 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 9867 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 71.92 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 327.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	81.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	75.5 pt
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	73.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	71.4 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	71.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	58.8 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	4903 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3946 (3883.92^min - 3946.42^max) MB/s -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3887 MB/s -21%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3819 (3405.77^min - 3819.33^max) MB/s -22%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=199, last 2 years)	3539 MB/s -28%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2529 (2450.31^min - 2528.54^max) MB/s -48%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	7889 (6495.73^min - 7888.81^max) MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	4457 MB/s -44%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3923 (3818.83^min - 3922.64^max) MB/s -50%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3899 (3880.57^min - 3898.61^max) MB/s -51%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3863 (3808.78^min - 3862.78^max) MB/s -51%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=199, last 2 years)	3829 MB/s -51%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	10557 (9742.97^min - 10557.3^max) MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	7028 (6634.28^min - 7027.76^max) MB/s -33%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6722 (5765.49^min - 6722^max) MB/s -36%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6666 (5850.89^min - 6666.43^max) MB/s -37%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6643 (6200.62^min - 6642.94^max) MB/s -37%
Average of class Gaming (2268 - 16089, n=199, last 2 years)	6390 MB/s -39%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	9830 (9799.27^min - 9829.82^max) MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	5004 (4980.32^min - 5004.43^max) MB/s -49%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4999 (4978.75^min - 4998.98^max) MB/s -49%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4951 (4938.35^min - 4951.38^max) MB/s -50%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4939 (4931.24^min - 4938.77^max) MB/s -50%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=199, last 2 years)	4818 MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	90.6 (86.51^min - 90.63^max) MB/s +24%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	89.8 (89.42^min - 89.75^max) MB/s +23%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	88.7 MB/s +21%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	87.3 (86.6^min - 87.26^max) MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	73.1 (72.79^min - 73.06^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=199, last 2 years)	67.9 MB/s -7%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	373 (371.9^min - 373.21^max) MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	359 (324.09^min - 358.58^max) MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	275 (273.95^min - 275.11^max) MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	252 (240.11^min - 252.24^max) MB/s -30%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=199, last 2 years)	224 MB/s -38%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	210 (209.55^min - 210.02^max) MB/s -42%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4073 (4064.94^min - 4073.47^max) MB/s +70%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3908 (3879.66^min - 3907.88^max) MB/s +64%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3555 (3552.55^min - 3555.1^max) MB/s +49%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3493 (3465.14^min - 3493.06^max) MB/s +46%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=199, last 2 years)	2590 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2390 (2226.95^min - 2390.15^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3612 (3585.78^min - 3612.01^max) MB/s +134%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3004 (2951.07^min - 3004.3^max) MB/s +95%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2645 (2612.9^min - 2645.36^max) MB/s +72%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=199, last 2 years)	2152 MB/s +40%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1542 (1501.74^min - 1541.63^max) MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1066 (1060.72^min - 1066.17^max) MB/s -31%

AS SSD
Score Total
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	9380 Points +41%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8982 Points +35%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8658 Points +30%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8103 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=186, last 2 years)	6843 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	6635 Points
Score Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3634 Points +39%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3344 Points +28%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3192 Points +22%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3054 Points +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2619 Points
Average of class Gaming (760 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years)	2508 Points -4%
Score Write
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3997 Points +56%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3991 Points +56%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3893 Points +52%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3545 Points +39%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=186, last 2 years)	3120 Points +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2556 Points
Seq Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	5588 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	5344.88 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5205 MB/s -3%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5120 MB/s -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5098.67 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years)	4963 MB/s -7%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	7663.27 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3936 MB/s -49%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3872.7 MB/s -49%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3692 MB/s -52%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=186, last 2 years)	3673 MB/s -52%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3267 MB/s -57%
4K Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	109.4 MB/s +59%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	82.8 MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.55 MB/s +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	76.99 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	68.93 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 112.1, n=186, last 2 years)	66.9 MB/s -3%
4K Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	328.69 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	321.6 MB/s -2%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	241.3 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming (96.3 - 512, n=186, last 2 years)	211 MB/s -36%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	201.1 MB/s -39%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	176.69 MB/s -46%
4K-64 Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	2966 MB/s +47%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2749 MB/s +36%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2604.76 MB/s +29%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2451.55 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2015.68 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (442 - 3475, n=186, last 2 years)	1939 MB/s -4%
4K-64 Write
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3387 MB/s +132%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	3342 MB/s +129%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3329.28 MB/s +128%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2950.05 MB/s +102%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=186, last 2 years)	2544 MB/s +74%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1460.96 MB/s
Access Time Read
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.057 ms * -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	0.056 ms * -6%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=184, last 2 years)	0.05343 ms * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	0.053 ms *
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.044 ms * +17%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.029 ms * +45%
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=186, last 2 years)	0.04639 ms * -257%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.023 ms * -77%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.021 ms * -62%
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.018 ms * -38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	0.013 ms *
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT	0.012 ms * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0): Ø8257 (5868.26-10519.1)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6642 (6357.38-6687.03)

MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø4011 (3422.21-6714.24)

Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6290 (5297.3-6328.92)

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT: Ø7004 (6456.5-7039.72)

Grafikkort

Den faktiska prestandan hos en RTX 3000 GPU beror på flera faktorer: kylningen, lagringsutrustningen och den maximala TGP som en tillverkare konfigurerar inom de gränser som Nvidia har definierat. Asus tillåter GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Bärbar datorgPU en maximal TGP på 165 watt (140 watt + 25 watt dynamisk boost). GPU:n kan använda snabb GDDR6-grafiklagring (16 384 MB).

Enligt Asus är den dynamiska förstärkningen (max 10 watt) endast tillgänglig om prestandaprofilen "Turbo" är vald, och testet Witcher 3 bekräftar detta. Det maximala (25 watt) skulle behöva aktiveras med hjälp av programvaran Armoury Crate (profilen "Manual"). Benchmarkresultaten ligger strax över RTX 3080 Ti-genomsnittet som vi hittills fastställt.

Men detta är inte slutet på det hela. Det finns också möjlighet till direkt bildutgång via GeForce GPU (Armoury Crate, MUX-switch: separat GPU). I kombination med en manuell ökning av dynamisk boost till 25 watt ökar grafikprestandan märkbart.

Fire Strike (nätdrift, separat GPU, dyn. boost 25 watt)

Bildutgången kan växlas till GeForce GPU via musklick

3DMark 11 Performance		31771 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		47119 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		24278 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | SPECviewperf 13 | SPECviewperf 2020

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GE76 Raider ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	100 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	97.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	96.6 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30 ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	91.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	90.3 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX ^-2! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	83.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	83.6 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	75.2 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	73.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX ^-25! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	57.9 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE76 Raider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	45050 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	44012 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)	42275 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	41590 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)	40487 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	40257 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (13920 - 45841, n=45)	39402 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	33249 Points -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	31565 Points -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	14745 Points -63%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)	34080 Points +24%
MSI GE76 Raider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	34041 Points +24%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	31082 Points +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (6928 - 34439, n=43)	29496 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)	29457 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	27562 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	26460 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	25240 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	24580 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	14198 Points -48%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE76 Raider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	13324 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)	13302 Points +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	12269 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=234, last 2 years)	12066 Points +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	12060 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (4921 - 13835, n=43)	11850 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	11227 Points
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	9646 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	9515 Points -15%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	9488 Points -15%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI GE76 Raider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	8462 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)	8139 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)	7919 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (6423 - 8462, n=28)	7800 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	7733 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming (280 - 14457, n=155, last 2 years)	7720 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	7329 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)	7251 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	6423 Points -12%

SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Average of class Gaming (87.4 - 179, n=21, last 2 years)	118.4 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (62.9 - 133.4, n=8)	108.8 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	108.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	102.3 fps -6%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Average of class Gaming (16.2 - 99.6, n=21, last 2 years)	29.6 fps +40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (18.3 - 25.3, n=8)	22.3 fps +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.7 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	21.2 fps
Showcase (showcase-02)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	148.9 fps
Average of class Gaming (25.9 - 281, n=21, last 2 years)	148.4 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (110 - 175, n=8)	146.6 fps -2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	127.2 fps -15%
Medical (medical-02)
Average of class Gaming (57.2 - 122.8, n=21, last 2 years)	78.8 fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	75.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (65.3 - 79.1, n=8)	74.5 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	71.9 fps -4%
Maya (maya-05)
Average of class Gaming (83.7 - 601, n=21, last 2 years)	340 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (212 - 430, n=8)	321 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	308.1 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	275.8 fps -10%
Energy (energy-02)
Average of class Gaming (20.3 - 74.7, n=21, last 2 years)	35.4 fps +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	26.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (19.3 - 27.3, n=8)	24.5 fps -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.7 fps -17%
Creo (creo-02)
Average of class Gaming (70.4 - 461, n=21, last 2 years)	254 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (177.4 - 311, n=8)	249 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	239.7 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	215.7 fps -10%
Catia (catia-05)
Average of class Gaming (47.7 - 344, n=21, last 2 years)	177.5 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	171.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (130.4 - 190.3, n=8)	170 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	161.6 fps -6%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Average of class Gaming (49.1 - 373, n=21, last 2 years)	229 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (161 - 260, n=8)	223 fps +7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	210.2 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	208.7 fps

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Gaming (29.9 - 515, n=23, last 2 years)	292 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	210.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (174.7 - 211, n=3)	198.6 fps
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming (2.93 - 231, n=36, last 2 years)	32.8 fps +55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (18.1 - 25, n=6)	21.8 fps +3%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.4 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	21.1 fps
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Gaming (23.5 - 59.9, n=36, last 2 years)	38.8 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	38.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (33 - 40.2, n=6)	37.4 fps -3%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	36.2 fps -6%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming (99.8 - 687, n=34, last 2 years)	397 fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (248 - 456, n=6)	351 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	336 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	308.7 fps -8%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Average of class Gaming (20.6 - 76.5, n=36, last 2 years)	42.3 fps +61%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	26.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (19.6 - 27, n=6)	23.7 fps -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.6 fps -18%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Gaming (44 - 141.9, n=35, last 2 years)	103.5 fps +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (55.3 - 114.7, n=6)	92.3 fps +7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	89.6 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	86.4 fps
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming (17.8 - 117.2, n=36, last 2 years)	70.5 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (51.8 - 78.7, n=6)	67.4 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	66.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	65.1 fps -2%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	128.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (99.2 - 153, n=6)	128.4 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 221, n=36, last 2 years)	122.5 fps -5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	121.5 fps -6%
3840x2160 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Gaming (97.2 - 255, n=6, last 2 years)	192.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (87.9 - 255, n=4)	137.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	104.1 fps
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming (16.8 - 67.8, n=12, last 2 years)	26.3 fps +45%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (15.5 - 21.1, n=7)	18.9 fps +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	18.1 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	18.1 fps
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Gaming (10.9 - 56, n=12, last 2 years)	25.1 fps +56%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (13.2 - 34.3, n=7)	17.9 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	16.1 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	14.5 fps -10%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming (137 - 474, n=12, last 2 years)	284 fps +76%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (137.4 - 345, n=7)	208 fps +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	161.1 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	152.1 fps -6%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	118.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (27.7 - 118.7, n=7)	65.1 fps -45%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	64.6 fps -46%
Average of class Gaming (1.83 - 118.7, n=12, last 2 years)	57.5 fps -52%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Gaming (60.8 - 132, n=12, last 2 years)	95 fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (49 - 93.3, n=7)	77.4 fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	73.5 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	70.4 fps -4%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming (13.5 - 109, n=12, last 2 years)	54.7 fps +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.3 - 69.6, n=7)	43.7 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	40.3 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	37.6 fps -7%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming (61.6 - 199, n=12, last 2 years)	106.8 fps +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (69.5 - 144, n=7)	95.7 fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	87.9 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	84.4 fps -4%

Spelprestanda

Hårdvaran visar alla aktuella spel smidigt på skärmen i FHD- till QHD-upplösning och maximala inställningar. Användning av den fulla skärmupplösningen på 3840 x 2400 pixlar kräver ibland reducerade inställningar. Bildfrekvensen ligger runt RTX 3080 Ti-genomsnittet. Den direkta bildutgången via GeForce GPU (MUX-switch: separat GPU) i kombination med en ökning av den dynamiska förstärkningen till 25 watt leder till en liten ökning av bildfrekvensen.

De låga bildfrekvenserna när profilen "Silent" är aktiverad beror på GeForce GPU:s "Whisper mode 2.0", som är tänkt att hålla ljudnivån så låg som möjligt samtidigt som bildfrekvensnivån fortfarande är tillräcklig för ett spel (minst 30 till 60 fps). Detta innebär att GPU:n inte behöver köra på full effekt, vilket ger mindre värmeproduktion och gör att fläktarna kan förbli tystare.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	126 (108^min) fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)	124.4 (20.1^min, 40.2^P0.1, 88.9^P1) fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	120.7 (22.4^min, 49.9^P0.1, 82.6^P1) fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	117.4 (26.9^min, 30.4^P0.1, 81.6^P1) fps +6%
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years)	117.1 fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 130.6, n=43)	112.1 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111.1 (30^min, 41.5^P0.1, 74.7^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	92.2 (19.1^min, 45.8^P0.1, 67.7^P1) fps -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	89.3 (64^min) fps -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	60 (33.6^min, 39^P0.1, 47.5^P1) fps -46%
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (42.8 - 107.6, n=16, last 2 years)	67.1 fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (44.8 - 62.7, n=5)	56.4 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	54.4 (30.3^min, 36.3^P0.1, 43.6^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	44.8 (14.7^min, 26.1^P0.1, 36.7^P1) fps -18%

Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	160 (139.4^min) fps +44%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	156 (137^min) fps +40%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	145.1 (124.5^min) fps +30%
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=238, last 2 years)	142.8 fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (29.9 - 170.5, n=45)	141.1 fps +27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)	118.5 (101.8^min) fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	115 (97.7^min) fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111.3 (96.1^min) fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	59.9 (57.1^min) fps -46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	59.6 (57.5^min) fps -46%
3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming (14.2 - 205, n=81, last 2 years)	136.7 fps +53%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (70.8 - 155.6, n=19)	124.8 fps +40%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	112 (98.7^min) fps +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	105.5 (92.7^min) fps +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	92.3 (81.3^min) fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	89.2 (77.6^min) fps

X-Plane 11.11
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming (12 - 145.5, n=76, last 2 years)	96.6 fps +46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (32.9 - 109.5, n=20)	82.7 fps +25%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	78.6 fps +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	66.7 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66.1 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	58.5 fps -11%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	109 fps +39%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	108 fps +38%
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=243, last 2 years)	102 fps +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (32.6 - 127, n=45)	101.1 fps +29%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	99.3 fps +27%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	93.4 fps +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)	82.8 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	79.7 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	78.2 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	60.4 fps -23%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
3840x2160 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (32.2 - 94.7, n=68, last 2 years)	62.6 fps +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, sep. GPU, 25W)	58.4 fps +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, Turbo)	55.4 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (35.1 - 61.2, n=18)	52.7 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	51.4 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, Leise)	47.2 fps -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	40.1 fps -22%
1920x1080 High Quality
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	131 (86^min) fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, sep. GPU, 25W)	125.1 fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, Turbo)	118.5 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.7 - 140.6, n=42)	113.8 fps +5%
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=228, last 2 years)	111.4 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	108 fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	90.4 fps -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	89.4 fps -17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	85.8 fps -21%

GTA V
3840x2160 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (33.6 - 90.9, n=49, last 2 years)	64.3 fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	63.2 (14.7^min, 47.6^P1) fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	59 (14.1^min, 43.5^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (37.7 - 67.2, n=14)	58.6 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	41.8 (13^min, 32.3^P1) fps -29%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	125 (10.6^min, 83.3^P1) fps +23%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	113 (20.6^min, 76.9^P1) fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 139.2, n=42)	111 fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	110.9 (20.6^min, 71.4^P1) fps +9%
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=218, last 2 years)	107.4 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)	106.6 (3.82^min, 71.4^P1) fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)	102.7 (18.1^min, 76.9^P1) fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101.5 (21.1^min, 71.4^P1) fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	92.4 (7.56^min, 62.5^P1) fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)	60 (11.5^min, 58.8^P1) fps -41%

F1 2021
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (47.6 - 115.1, n=22, last 2 years)	71.6 fps +19%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	68 (59^min) fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, sep. GPU, 25W)	66.4 (58^min, 57^P1) fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Turbo)	64.4 (56^min, 53^P1) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (41.1 - 70.2, n=18)	60.9 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931)	60 (51^min, 49^P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Leise)	56.5 (50^min, 47^P1) fps -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (852849)	47.3 (39^min, 38^P1) fps -21%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	157 (132^min) fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, sep. GPU, 25W)	155.9 (129^min, 120^P1) fps +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Turbo)	142.1 (121^min, 103^P1) fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931)	130.2 (109^min, 92^P1) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931)	126.3 (112^min, 91^P1) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.2 - 160.6, n=30)	126.1 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming (13.5 - 271, n=63, last 2 years)	118.4 fps -9%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (852849)	103 (76^min, 83^P1) fps -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Leise)	60 (59^min, 57^P1) fps -54%

Strange Brigade
3840x2160 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (54.5 - 298, n=57, last 2 years)	113.2 fps +34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Turbo)	92.9 (64.3^min, 67.3^P1) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (61.7 - 100.7, n=15)	87.6 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	84.5 (30.7^min, 66.2^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	68.4 (41.3^min, 58.5^P1) fps -19%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	221 (94.6^min, 162^P1) fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, sep. GPU, 25W)	221 (76.3^min, 154.1^P1) fps +21%
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=226, last 2 years)	207 fps +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	196.3 (44.4^min, 139.6^P1) fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Turbo)	194.9 (119.9^min, 137.3^P1) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (42.3 - 224, n=41)	187.3 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	182.4 (66.8^min, 132.6^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	151 (35.4^min, 116^P1) fps -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	149.8 (29.6^min, 114.2^P1) fps -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Leise)	60 (44^min, 59.5^P1) fps -67%

Far Cry 5
3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (39 - 113, n=33, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (45 - 76, n=9)	67.6 fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60 (54^min) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	45 (37^min) fps -25%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (111 - 162, n=24)	133 fps +20%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	130 (93^min) fps +17%
Average of class Gaming (14 - 218, n=125, last 2 years)	126.3 fps +14%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	122 (97^min) fps +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111 (82^min) fps

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	49.9 (28.1^min) fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (39.2 - 49.9, n=7)	43.3 fps +7%
Average of class Gaming (12.6 - 74, n=38, last 2 years)	43 fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40.3 (29.8^min) fps
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (4.3 - 56, n=39, last 2 years)	34 fps +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (19.6 - 32.4, n=6)	27.1 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	25.2 (16.6^min) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	19.6 (13^min) fps -22%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	99.1 (29^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (54 - 144.1, n=16)	93.6 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (16.7 - 159.7, n=102, last 2 years)	86.7 fps -13%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	73.2 (55.1^min) fps -26%

Far Cry 6
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	114 (96^min) fps +32%
Average of class Gaming (14.7 - 167, n=35, last 2 years)	98.8 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (71.3 - 114, n=6)	98.7 fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	86.2 (65^min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	71.3 (59^min) fps -17%
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average of class Gaming (3.38 - 92, n=18, last 2 years)	62.1 fps +34%
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57 (47^min) fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (46.2 - 57, n=4)	52.9 fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	46.2 (42^min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (91 - 92, n=3)	91.3 fps
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	91 (81^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (53 - 119, n=11, last 2 years)	86.5 fps

Rainbow Six Extraction
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	169 (107^min) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	159 (114^min) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (128 - 169, n=3)	152 fps -10%
Average of class Gaming (33 - 314, n=16, last 2 years)	133.3 fps -21%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	128 fps -24%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality)
Average of class Gaming (37 - 112, n=5, last 2 years)	69.3 fps +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57 (30^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (44 - 57, n=2)	50.5 fps -11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	44 (19^min) fps -23%

Ghostwire Tokyo
1920x1080 Highest Settings
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	143.3 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (125 - 143.3, n=2)	134.2 fps -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	125 (28.2^min, 41.7^P0.1, 80.1^P1) fps -13%
Average of class Gaming (18.1 - 231, n=20, last 2 years)	120.3 fps -16%
3840x2160 Highest Settings
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	59.9 (20.5^min, 29.9^P0.1, 40.4^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	59.9 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (11 - 100, n=8, last 2 years)	57.4 fps -4%
1920x1080 Highest Settings + Maximum Ray Tracing
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 127, n=13, last 2 years)	68.6 fps +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	68.3 (19.2^min, 29.1^P0.1, 43.2^P1) fps +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (66.1 - 68.3, n=2)	67.2 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66.1 (22.5^min, 32.9^P0.1, 42.2^P1) fps

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12)
Average of class Gaming (9.7 - 189.4, n=60, last 2 years)	108.7 fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (100.7 - 110.5, n=4)	104.6 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	104.3 fps
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	103 fps -1%
3840x2160 Badass Preset (DX12)
Average of class Gaming (6.6 - 73.7, n=33, last 2 years)	49.3 fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (40.1 - 43.9, n=2)	42 fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40.1 fps

Guardians of the Galaxy
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	155 (87^min) fps +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (112 - 155, n=3)	139.7 fps +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	112 (74^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (42 - 163, n=14, last 2 years)	111.5 fps 0%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	75 (20^min) fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (60 - 75, n=2)	67.5 fps +13%
Average of class Gaming (42 - 96, n=4, last 2 years)	64.5 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60 (45^min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray-Tracing
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	104 (72^min) fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (82 - 104, n=2)	93 fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	82 (52^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (37 - 128, n=10, last 2 years)	73.8 fps -10%

Alan Wake Remastered
3840x2160 High Preset
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	89 (40.7^min, 52^P0.1, 72.3^P1) fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (71.6 - 89, n=2)	80.3 fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	71.6 (21.9^min, 39.4^P0.1, 48.8^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (last 2 years)	71.6 fps 0%
1920x1080 High Preset
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	155 (49.6^min, 56^P0.1, 120^P1) fps +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (118.8 - 155, n=2)	136.9 fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	118.8 (31.4^min, 50^P0.1, 97.7^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (95.3 - 144.9, n=6, last 2 years)	118.3 fps 0%

Dying Light 2
1920x1080 High Quality Raytracing
Average of class Gaming (19.8 - 83.9, n=21, last 2 years)	42.2 fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	38.8 (22.1^min, 25.7^P0.1, 30.7^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (33.4 - 42.3, n=5)	38.5 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	33.4 (23.3^min, 24.3^P0.1, 27.8^P1) fps -14%
3840x2160 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (20.8 - 62, n=9, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +40%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	31 (24.4^min, 26^P0.1, 27.8^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (27.3 - 31, n=2)	29.2 fps -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	27.3 (15.7^min, 18.5^P0.1, 24.9^P1) fps -12%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (35.8 - 174, n=26, last 2 years)	83.9 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (69.2 - 88.4, n=5)	80.5 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	77.6 (65.2^min, 69.1^P0.1, 71.6^P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	69.2 (52^min, 58.4^P0.1, 62.9^P1) fps -11%

För att utvärdera om bildfrekvensen förblir ganska konstant under en längre tidsperiod lät vi spelet"The Witcher 3" köras i cirka 60 minuter i Full-HD-upplösning och maximala kvalitetsinställningar, utan att flytta spelkaraktären. Vi märkte inte av någon nedgång i bildfrekvensen.

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø111.3 (107-116)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø87.2 (70-92)

MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø122.2 (107-127)

Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø112.9 (95-119)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Leise: Ø60 (59-61)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Turbo: Ø117.9 (98-124)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; sep. GPU, 25W: Ø124.6 (120-128)

Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91.2 (87-96)

GPU-mätningar under Witcher 3 -testet (Turbo)

GPU-mätningar under Witcher 3 -testet (tyst)

GPU-mätningar under Witcher 3 -testet (sep. GPU, dyn. boost 25W)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	180.4	175.4	158.9	101.5	92.2	101.5
The Witcher 3 (2015)	345	298	197.9	111.1		80.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	133.8	122.2	114.8	111.3		89.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	177.8	138.7	108		84.6	51.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	112.9	95.1	78.2			66.1
Far Cry 5 (2018)	146	124	120	111	104	60
Strange Brigade (2018)	359	229	198.8	182.4	140.2	84.5
F1 2021 (2021)	330	275	225	130.2	102.5	60
Alan Wake Remastered (2021)	142.4	123.4	118.8		114.4	71.6
Far Cry 6 (2021)	116.2	100.3	90.9	71.3	75.2	46.2
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021)	118	113	112	112	103	60
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022)	243	207	202	169	113	57
Dying Light 2 (2022)	106.9	88.4	77.6		55.8	31
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	136.3	119.6	98.3	99.1	53.7	25.2
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022)	148.1	146.8	143.8	143.3	110.6	59.9
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	192.7	167.3	128.9	104.3	73.5	40.1

Utsläpp - Asus ROG 16 med acceptabel buller- och värmeutveckling

Bullerutsläpp

Under vardaglig drift med kontors- och internetuppgifter tar de två fläktarna det lugnt och producerar endast mycket lite ljud. Ibland är de till och med avstängda. Vid full belastning blir de däremot högljudda med en maximal ljudnivå på 50 dB(A) under stresstestet och 48 dB(A) under Witcher 3 -testet. Även om bullerutvecklingen kan minskas genom att välja profilen "Silent", sker detta på bekostnad av datorprestanda.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		26 / 27 / 29 dB(A)
Hög belastning		41 / 50 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 26 dB(A)

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Noise		10%	4%	-11%	-8%	-9%
off / environment *	26	24.2 7%	26 -0%	26 -0%	26 -0%	25 4%
Idle Minimum *	26	24.2 7%	26 -0%	26 -0%	27 -4%	30 -15%
Idle Average *	27	24.2 10%	27 -0%	27 -0%	29 -7%	32 -19%
Idle Maximum *	29	24.2 17%	29 -0%	40 -38%	34 -17%	33 -14%
Load Average *	41	42.9 -5%	37 10%	50 -22%	48 -17%	45 -10%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48	39.5 18%	44 8%	53 -10%	51 -6%	50 -4%
Load Maximum *	50	42.9 14%	45 10%	53 -6%	53 -6%	52 -4%

* ... smaller is better

Temperaturer

Under daglig drift (kontor, Internet) håller sig temperaturerna inom det gröna intervallet. Under belastning (stresstest, Witcher 3 test) värms den bärbara datorn upp utan att bli överdrivet varm. CPU-temperaturerna ligger inom acceptabla nivåer.

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


35 °C	36 °C	35 °C
44 °C	45 °C	39 °C
41 °C	40 °C	38 °C

Max: 45 °C
Medel: 39.2 °C


50 °C	50 °C	46 °C
45 °C	46 °C	44 °C
43 °C	44 °C	42 °C

Max: 50 °C
Medel: 45.6 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 47 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


29 °C	29 °C	28 °C
32 °C	33 °C	31 °C
29 °C	29 °C	28 °C

Max: 33 °C
Medel: 29.8 °C


33 °C	33 °C	32 °C
33 °C	33 °C	32 °C
30 °C	31 °C	30 °C

Max: 33 °C
Medel: 31.9 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 34 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


35 °C	39 °C	37 °C
46 °C	44 °C	39 °C
42 °C	41 °C	38 °C

Max: 46 °C
Medel: 40.1 °C


51 °C	51 °C	46 °C
45 °C	46 °C	43 °C
43 °C	44 °C	43 °C

Max: 51 °C
Medel: 45.8 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 45 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat		20%	-12%	-1%	-13%	-5%
Maximum Upper Side *	45	42.3 6%	53 -18%	43 4%	55 -22%	49 -9%
Maximum Bottom *	50	41.7 17%	53 -6%	47 6%	62 -24%	55 -10%
Idle Upper Side *	33	23.9 28%	36 -9%	33 -0%	32 3%	33 -0%
Idle Bottom *	33	23.9 28%	38 -15%	37 -12%	36 -9%	33 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Stresstest

I början av stresstestet med Prime95 och Furmark igång i minst en timme körs CPU:n (4-4,1 GHz) och GPU:n (1 000-1 600 MHz) med höga klockfrekvenser. Fortsättningsvis sjunker värdena till mellan 3 och 3,1 GHz (CPU) och mellan 850 och 900 MHz (GPU). Stresstestet representerar ett extremt scenario, och vi använder detta test för att utvärdera om systemet förblir stabilt under full belastning.

Högtalare

Stereohögtalarna ger ett hyfsat ljud, även om det skulle behöva mer bas. För en bättre ljudupplevelse rekommenderas hörlurar eller externa högtalare.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energihantering - Zephyrus Duo har en bra batteritid

Effektförbrukning

Vid tomgångsdrift har GX650 en något högre strömförbrukning än de flesta andra Windows-konkurrenter. Ingen av de andra konkurrenterna kan dock nå upp till de låga värdena för MacBook Pro 16. Stresstestet eller Witcher-3-testet leder till att Zephyrus förbrukning ökar upp till maximalt 256 watt eller 186,5 watt i genomsnitt, vilket är normala värden för den hårdvara som används här. Medan strömförbrukningen förblir konstant under Witcher 3 -testet, sjunker den något under stresstestet. Det medföljande nätaggregatet är dimensionerat till 280 watt och är tillräckligt stort.

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.1 / Watt
Låg belastning	19 / 24 / 31 Watt
Hög belastning	104 / 256 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		42%	16%	4%	9%	-15%	11%
Idle Minimum *	19	5.4 72%	17 11%	12 37%	12 37%	26 -37%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years) 27%
Idle Average *	24	16.4 32%	19 21%	17 29%	16 33%	30 -25%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Maximum *	31	16.7 46%	25 19%	28 10%	22 29%	37 -19%	27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years) 13%
Load Average *	104	94 10%	108 -4%	118 -13%	118 -13%	127 -22%	111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years) -7%
Witcher 3 ultra *	186.5	104 44%	150 20%	252 -35%	223 -20%	176 6%
Load Maximum *	256	135 47%	179 30%	272 -6%	290 -13%	236 8%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years) 2%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø186.5 (182.4-193.3)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø202 (151.3-250)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø130.5 (128-133.6)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø129.5 (127.8-130.9)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø166.2 (157.9-172.1)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø174.7 (170-184)

Batteritid

I WLAN-testet där webbplatser laddas via skript och i videotestet där kortfilmen Big Buck Bunny (H.264-kodning, FHD) körs i en konstant slinga håller den bärbara 16-tums datorn i 7:49 timmar respektive 9:19 timmar. Under båda testerna är den bärbara datorns energisparfunktioner inaktiverade och skärmens ljusstyrka justerad till cirka 150 cd/m². När videotestet körs är kommunikationsmodulerna också avstängda.

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		12tim 29min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 101)		7tim 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9tim 19min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		1tim 02min

	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh	Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 91.2 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		59%	-3%	-35%	10%	-3%	-11%
Reader / Idle	749		484 -35%		463 -38%	533 -29%	544 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years) -27%
H.264	559	1021 83%	356 -36%		386 -31%	452 -19%	399 ?(56 - 747, n=92, last 2 years) -29%
WiFi v1.3	469	894 91%	293 -38%	306 -35%	341 -27%	381 -19%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years) -22%
Load	62	63 2%	122 97%		145 134%	96 55%	84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years) 36%

För

+ matt 4k-skärm i formatet 16:10

+ bra färgåtergivning (Pantone-certifiering)

+ brett färgomfång

+ Dolby Vision/HDR

+ FreeSync och G-Sync (det senare via USB-C)

+ hög systemprestanda

+ alternativ för överklockning

+ robust metallhölje

+ 2 PCIe 4 SSD-enheter (Raid 0)

+ mycket lagringsutrymme (4 TB)

+ snabb kortläsare

+ utmärkt WLAN-överföringshastighet

+ mycket bra batteritid

+ Power Delivery

Emot

- har ej Thunderbolt 4 eller USB 4

- större och tyngre än jämförbara enheter

Omdöme - En kraftfull bärbar dator för det kreativa segmentet

ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX, tillhandahållen av Asus Tyskland

Asus marknadsför Zephyrus främst som en bärbar dator för spel, men konceptet för den bärbara datorn är också inriktat på innehållsskapare: Video- och bildbehandling, rendering och givetvis även spelande är de centrala disciplinerna. 4k-spel är möjligt i höga till maximala inställningar.

Även om Screenpad Plus bör erbjuda ett visst mervärde i vissa scenarier ökar också datorns vikt, inköpspris och storlek.

ARyzen 9-6900HXaPU och GeForce RTX 3080-Ti bärbar datorgPU levererar den nödvändiga datorprestandan, och båda komponenterna körs med en konstant, hög klockfrekvens. Två PCIe 4 SSD-enheter (RAID 0) garanterar korta laddningstider och erbjuder mycket lagringsutrymme (4 TB). Hela paketet avrundas av 64 GB arbetsminne.

Buller- och värmeutvecklingen under belastning ligger på den vanliga nivån för den här klassen av bärbara datorer. Under daglig drift förblir den bärbara datorn dock mycket tyst. Den bra 16-tumsskärmen i formatet 16:10 poängterar med en utmärkt färgåtergivning (Pantone-certifiering) och täcker DCI-P3-färgrymden helt och hållet.

Trots den höga datorprestandan behöver du inte leva med en kort batteritid. En batteriladdning (90 Wh) räcker för en WLAN-drifttid på nästan 8 timmar. En annan positiv punkt är möjligheten att ladda batteriet med en universell USB-C-laddare (45 watt min.), eftersom den vänstra USB-C Gen 2-porten också stöder Power Delivery. Det innebär att du inte nödvändigtvis behöver ta med dig det rejäla nätaggregatet på 280 watt.

Ett alternativ till Zephyrus skulle vara följande Gigabyte Aero 16, som erbjuder en högre CPU-prestanda och en Thunderbolt 4-port. Nackdelarna är en sämre batteritid, en reflekterande skärm och mer värmeutveckling. Om du behöver en kraftfull datorprestanda och en så lång batteritid som möjligt kan du knappast komma förbi Apple MacBook Pro 16. Å andra sidan kan du då varken byta ut eller utöka SSD-enheten eller arbetsminnet. Dessutom använder MacBook också en reflekterande skärm.

Pris och tillgänglighet

ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX är redan listad på Asus amerikanska webbplatsvid tidpunkten för detta test, finns det andra onlinebutiker som CDW (4097 dollar) och B&H Photo ($4000) visar att den inte finns i lager ännu.

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX - 2022-05-23 05/23/2022 v7
Sascha Mölck

Design

86 / 98 → 88%

Tangentbord

81%

Mus

83%

Anslutningar

70 / 80 → 88%

Vikt

59 / 10-66 → 88%

Batteri

80 / 95 → 84%

Skärm

89%

Spelprestanda

98%

Programprestanda

97%

Temperatur

80 / 95 → 84%

Ljudnivå

81 / 90 → 90%

Audio

74%

Camera

41 / 85 → 48%

Medel

78%

88%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 510 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Recension av Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16: En ovanlig bärbar dator med bra batteritid

Sascha Mölck, 2022-05-24 (Update: 2022-05-30)

Recension av Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16: En ovanlig bärbar dator med bra batteritid

Jämförelse med potentiella konkurrenter

Hölje - GX650 har ett robust metallhölje

Storleksjämförelse

Utrustning - Zephyrus erbjuder inte Thunderbolt 4

SD-kortläsare

Kommunikation

Webbkamera

Tillbehör

Underhåll

Garanti

Inmatningsenheter - En andra skärm för den bärbara datorn från Asus

Tangentbord

Pekplatta

Asus Screenpad Plus

Skärm - Bra färgåtergivning

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Föreställning - Rembrandt möter Ampere

Testvillkor

Processor

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Systemets prestanda

DPC-latenstider

Lösning för lagring

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Grafikkort

Spelprestanda

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Utsläpp - Asus ROG 16 med acceptabel buller- och värmeutveckling

Bullerutsläpp

Temperaturer

Stresstest

Högtalare

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX audio analysis

Energihantering - Zephyrus Duo har en bra batteritid

Effektförbrukning

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Power Consumption With External Monitor

Batteritid

För

Emot

Omdöme - En kraftfull bärbar dator för det kreativa segmentet

Pris och tillgänglighet

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare