Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Recension: Prisvärd bärbar gamingdator med RTX 4050 och långa drifttider

Name: Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE
Brand: Acer

Hållbar. En Ryzen 5 7535HS, GeForce RTX 4050, USB 4 och en ljus 16:10-skärm (16 tum, WUXGA, 165 Hz, G-Sync) är höjdpunkterna i den relativt billiga (1 250 €) Nitro 16. Under rätt förhållanden överträffas de redan mycket bra batteritiderna för föregångaren ytterligare. Denna recension utvärderar prestanda och andra egenskaper hos denna alternativa konfiguration.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/13/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Windows

Med ett pris på strax under 1 250 euro tillhör den nuvarande konfigurationen av Acer Nitro 16 det lägre prissegmentet för bärbara speldatorer. Vår Nitro 16-enhet drivs av en AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS APU och en Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 bärbar GPU.

Konkurrensen inkluderar enheter som Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS, Schenker XMG Focus 15 (E23), Gigabyte G7 KE, Asus TUF A15 FA507och Medion Erazer Scout E20.

Information om fodralet, utrustningen och ingångsenheterna finns i vår recension av den identiskt byggda systermodellsom har en Ryzen 7 7735HS och en RTX 4070 Laptop GPU.

Test device courtesy of Nvidia DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE (Nitro 16 Serie)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS 6 x 3.3 - 4.6 GHz, 100 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt R

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Kärna: 2355 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3623, Optimus

Minne

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Skärm

16.00 tum 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixlar 142 PPI, AU Optronics B160UAN01.Q, IPS, glansig: nej, 165 Hz

Moderkort

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Hårddisk

SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, 512 GB

, 426 GB ledigt

Ljudkort

Realtek ALC245 @ AMD K19.4

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Headset combined port, Kortläsare: MicroSD, TPM 2.0

Nätverk

Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 27.9 x 360.1 x 279.9

Batteri

90 Wh, 5850 mAh Litiumjon

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webbkamera: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.56 kg, Strömförsörjning: 620 g

Pris

1399 Euro

Länkar

Acer hemsida
Acer kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.7 %	08/2023	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	27.9 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
86.9 %	06/2023	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	2.2 kg	22.1 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
85.1 %	07/2023	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	26.9 mm	15.60"	2569x1440
83.3 %	01/2023	Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	25 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.3 %	06/2023	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83 %	05/2023	Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	29 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Gigabyte G7 KE Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Asus TUF A15 FA507 Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS DIN A4 ❌

Vänster sida: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 2.0 (USB-A), minneskortsläsare (MicroSD), ljudkombination

Höger sida: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), plats för kabellås

På baksidan: Strömförsörjningsport, HDMI 2.1, USB 4 (USB-C; strömförsörjning, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; strömförsörjning, Displayport)

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=99, last 2 years)	98.6 MB/s +17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	84 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	80.3 MB/s -4%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=93, last 2 years)	122.2 MB/s +40%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	89.98 MB/s +3%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	89 MB/s +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	87.5 MB/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	87 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1636 (1591^min - 1674^max) MBit/s +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1491 (1391^min - 1562^max) MBit/s
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1476 (1278^min - 1551^max) MBit/s -1%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (358 - 1785, n=38)	1328 MBit/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)	1263 MBit/s -15%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921	985 (902^min - 1065^max) MBit/s -34%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	941 (465^min - 984^max) MBit/s -37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	776 (392^min - 802^max) MBit/s -48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1744 (1670^min - 1770^max) MBit/s +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1685 (1180^min - 1751^max) MBit/s
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1655 (1627^min - 1681^max) MBit/s -2%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (848 - 1775, n=38)	1435 MBit/s -15%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)	1397 MBit/s -17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	957 (480^min - 968^max) MBit/s -43%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921	917 (797^min - 933^max) MBit/s -46%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	905 (765^min - 969^max) MBit/s -46%

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1491 (1391-1562)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø763 (392-802)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (465-984)

Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1636 (1591-1674)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø985 (902-1065)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1476 (1278-1551)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1679 (1470-1802)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1684 (1180-1751)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø905 (765-969)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø940 (480-968)

Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1627-1681)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø916 (797-933)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1744 (1670-1770)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1725 (1685-1740)

ColorChecker Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE: 14.18 ∆E min: 0.59 - max: 20.56 ∆E

Display - 16:10-panel med sRGB-täckning

Positiva egenskaper för den matta 16-tums 1 920 x 1 200 IPS-skärmen i 16:10-format inkluderar stöd för G-Sync, frånvaro av PWM-flimmer och korta svarstider. Ljusstyrka och kontrast på 165 Hz-panelen uppfyller respektive mål (> 300 cd/m² respektive 1 000:1).

Utöver detta finns det inte många skillnader jämfört med WQXGA-panelen (2 560 x 1 600 pixlar) i systermodelläven om den senare erbjuder en högre maximal ljusstyrka (nästan 500 cd/m²).


387 cd/m²	381 cd/m²	378 cd/m²
381 cd/m²	415 cd/m²	388 cd/m²
358 cd/m²	378 cd/m²	350 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

AU Optronics B160UAN01.Q tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 415 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 379.6 cd/m² Minimum: 24 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 415 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1153:1 (Svärta: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.71 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.68
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
77.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.182

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AU Optronics B160UAN01.Q, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) BOE0AD1, IPS, 2569x1440, 15.60	Gigabyte G7 KE AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Asus TUF A15 FA507 N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Medion Erazer Scout E20 LG Philips LGD0611, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 BOE CQ NE16QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display		-8%	12%	-6%	-12%	-12%	-8%
Display P3 Coverage	80	69.3 -13%	98.6 23%	70.4 -12%	64.9 -19%	65.1 -19%	67.9 -15%
sRGB Coverage	99.4	97.3 -2%	99.9 1%	99.8 0%	96.5 -3%	96.7 -3%	99.1 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	77.4	70.7 -9%	86.3 11%	71.7 -7%	66.6 -14%	66.5 -14%	69.9 -10%
Response Times		-66%	-81%	-3%	-236%	-66%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	11.2 ?(5.3, 5.9)	15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3) -39%	15.6 ?(7.4, 8.2) -39%	5 ?(2.1, 2.9) 55%	30.4 ?(14.8, 15.6) -171%	14.8 ?(7.2, 7.6) -32%	11 ?(5, 6) 2%
Response Time Black / White *	5.2 ?(1.9, 3.3)	10 ?(5.7, 4.3) -92%	11.6 ?(5.8, 5.8) -123%	8.3 ?(4.2, 4.1) -60%	20.8 ?(11.7, 9.1) -300%	10.4 ?(5.4, 5) -100%	5 ?(2, 3) 4%
PWM Frequency
Screen		25%	-2%	28%	28%	14%	27%
Brightness middle	415	301 -27%	302 -27%	307 -26%	288 -31%	312 -25%	520 25%
Brightness	380	294 -23%	278 -27%	301 -21%	271 -29%	303 -20%	494 30%
Brightness Distribution	84	94 12%	85 1%	93 11%	91 8%	91 8%	91 8%
Black Level *	0.36	0.21 42%	0.36 -0%	0.2 44%	0.17 53%	0.25 31%	0.39 -8%
Contrast	1153	1433 24%	839 -27%	1535 33%	1694 47%	1248 8%	1333 16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.71	1.79 62%	2.24 52%	1.32 72%	1.9 60%	2.65 44%	1.94 59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.98	3.48 50%	5.52 21%	4.6 34%	3.3 53%	6.44 8%	5.62 19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.68	1.2 55%		1.03 62%	0.9 66%	0.96 64%	0.74 72%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.6	2.5 31%	3.87 -8%	2.1 42%	2.7 25%	3.2 11%	2.94 18%
Gamma	2.182 ^101%	2.265 ^97%	2.42 ^91%	2.247 ^98%	2.32 ^95%	2.246 ^98%	2.37 ^93%
CCT	7153 ^91%	6157 ^106%	6936 ^94%	6815 ^95%	6535 ^99%	7258 ^90%	6443 ^101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-16% / 5%	-24% / -11%	6% / 16%	-73% / -18%	-21% / -3%	7% / 16%

* ... smaller is better

Skärmen visar en hyfsad färgåtergivning från fabrik - med en avvikelse på ca 4,7 är målet (DeltaE < 3) inte exakt matchat. En kalibrering minskar avvikelsen till 2,68 och säkerställer mer balanserade gråskalenivåer. Panelen kan helt återge sRGB-färgskalan men inte Adobe RGB och Display P3-färgrymderna.

Detta är fallet för WQXGA-panelen i onitro 16-varianten, liksom skärmarna hos de flesta konkurrenter. Endast skärmen i XMG Focus 15 erbjuder bra DCI-P3-täckning.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.9 ms rise
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.3 ms rise
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17853 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

IPS-panelen ger stabila betraktningsvinklar som kan läsas från alla positioner. Panelens ljusstyrka är tillräckligt bra för läsbarhet utomhus om solen inte skiner för starkt.

Uppträdande: Acer fokuserar på Rembrandt och Ada Lovelace

Nitro 16-serien kombinerar Ada-Lovelace GPU:er med processorer från Intel eller AMD. Den nuvarande modellen förlitar sig på AMD och är tillgänglig för cirka 1 250 euro (~ 1 500 US-dollar). Därmed är den för närvarande den billigaste representanten för serien.

Testförhållanden

Av de sex tillverkarspecifika prestandalägena (se tabell nedan) användes lägena "Balanserad" (för benchmarks) och "Eco" (för batteritester). "Turbo" och "Performance" är endast tillgängliga vid nätdrift (batterinivå > 30%). En knapp ovanför tangentbordet gör det möjligt att växla mellan lägena. Alternativt kan detta göras via NitroSense-programvaran (kontrollcenter på den bärbara datorn). En LED indikerar det aktiva läget.

Obs: Medan andra Nitro 16 modell testades med Optimus-läget aktivt, används dGPU-läget (= iGPU är inaktiverat) på den aktuella testenheten. Batteritesterna är dock ett undantag. Benchmarkresultaten är därför inte alltid direkt jämförbara.

	Turbo	Power	Balanserad	Tyst	Balanserad (batteri)	Eco (batteri)
PowerLimit1 (HWInfo)	95 Watt	75 Watt	65 Watt	45 Watt	25 Watt	25 Watt
Effektgräns 2 (HWInfo)	100 Watt	100 Watt	100 Watt	100 Watt	25 Watt	25 Watt
Prestanda (Witcher 3 )	~84 fps	~83 fps	~82 fps	~74 fps	-	-
Buller (Witcher 3 )	61 dB(A)	56 dB(A)	45 dB(A)	35 dB(A)	-	-

Processor

Ryzen 5 Ryzen 5 7535HSaPU (Zen 3+, Rembrandt-R) erbjuder sex CPU-kärnor med totalt 12 trådar vid en maximal single-core boost på 4,55 GHz. CPU:n bekräftar permanent multitrådbelastning (CB15 Loop) med en konstant hög turboklocka - oavsett vilket systemläge som valts. Skillnaderna mellan lägena är små.

Inte överraskande, Ryzen 7 APU i systermodell bättre prestanda för flera trådar - den har trots allt 8 CPU-kärnor. När det gäller single-thread-prestanda, som är mer relevant vid daglig användning, är APU: erna nästan på nivå.

Cinebench R15 multi-core loop

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS: Ø1686 (1633.32-1757.16)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2646 (2596.9-2666.67)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3594 (3477.05-4085.8)

Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2150 (2119.99-2197.32)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2219 (2188.66-2273.89)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2149 (1980.2-2683.11)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2303 (2287.15-2328.15)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	82.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	70.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70.4 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	65.4 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	58.6 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	56.7 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	56.6 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	49.7 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	49.7 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	24270 Points +123%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)	19747 Points +81%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	16907 Points +55%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	15718 Points +44%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	14232 Points +31%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	14131 Points +30%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	13750 Points +26%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	10900 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	10900 Points 0%
Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	1935 Points +30%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	1849 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)	1823 Points +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1791 Points +20%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1701 Points +14%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1488 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	1488 Points 0%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	9152 Points +117%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)	7506 Points +78%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6571 Points +56%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	6051 Points +43%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5502 Points +30%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5368 Points +27%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5354 Points +27%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	4224 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	4224 Points 0%
CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	742 Points +28%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	717 Points +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	702 Points +21%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)	702 Points +21%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	654 Points +13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	603 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	601 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	581 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	581 Points 0%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	4086 (3477.05^min - 4085.8^max) Points +133%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)	3119 Points +78%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	2683 Points +53%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2666.7 Points +52%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2328 Points +32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2274 (2188.66^min - 2273.89^max) Points +29%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	2197 Points +25%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1757 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	1757 Points 0%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	283 Points +17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	270 Points +12%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	269 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)	269 Points +12%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	250 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	249 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	247 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	241 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	241 Points 0%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	286 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	286 Seconds * -0%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	225 Seconds * +21%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	223 Seconds * +22%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	219 Seconds * +23%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	213 Seconds * +26%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=224, last 2 years)	198 Seconds * +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	189 Seconds * +34%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	135 Seconds * +53%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	99191 MIPS +104%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)	77824 MIPS +60%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70081 MIPS +44%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	63399 MIPS +30%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	61191 MIPS +26%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	60612 MIPS +25%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	53712 MIPS +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	48646 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	48646 MIPS 0%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6621 MIPS +17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	6367 MIPS +12%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)	6152 MIPS +9%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	6004 MIPS +6%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5786 MIPS +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	5670 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	5670 MIPS 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5584 MIPS -2%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5563 MIPS -2%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	18308 Points +133%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)	13733 Points +75%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	12423 Points +58%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12111 Points +54%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	10284 Points +31%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9683 Points +23%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9346 Points +19%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	7852 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	7852 Points 0%
Single-Core
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2032 Points +35%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=231, last 2 years)	1818 Points +21%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	1813 Points +21%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1683 Points +12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1555 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1507 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1502 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	1502 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	1345 Points -10%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	25 fps +76%
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)	21.4 fps +51%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20.8 fps +46%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.5 fps +23%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.4 fps +23%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	16.9 fps +19%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	16.6 fps +17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	14.2 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	14.2 fps 0%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	53.4 s * -16%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50.6 s * -10%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)	49.3 s * -7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	46.2 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	46.2 s * -0%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	45.5 s * +2%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	44.9 s * +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	41.7 s * +10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	39.5 s * +15%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	0.503 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	0.503 sec * -0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4964 sec * +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4958 sec * +1%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	0.4748 sec * +6%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)	0.4679 sec * +7%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4451 sec * +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4345 sec * +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4253 sec * +15%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

37321

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

14167

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6257

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

20.14 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

102.32 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.79 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

241 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

151.1 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1757 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	90.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	88.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	77.8 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69.3 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66.6 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	61.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	59.5 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	59.5 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	58.1 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	28033 KRay/s +117%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	20615 KRay/s +59%
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years)	18803 KRay/s +45%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17161 KRay/s +33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	16315 KRay/s +26%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	14305 KRay/s +11%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	13017 KRay/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	12945 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	12945 KRay/s 0%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	122098 Points +54%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	108878 Points +37%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105483 Points +33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	102221 Points +29%
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years)	94169 Points +19%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	79252 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	79252 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71043 Points -10%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	65572 Points -17%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	5324 MB/s +99%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	4566 MB/s +70%
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years)	4369 MB/s +63%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3492 MB/s +30%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3421 MB/s +28%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3236 MB/s +21%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3233 MB/s +21%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2679 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	2679 MB/s 0%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	134897 Points +63%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	124433 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years)	110053 Points +33%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	108729 Points +32%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	106626 Points +29%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	103991 Points +26%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82540 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	82540 Points 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	80285 Points -3%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	15380 Points +57%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	13789 Points +41%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13097 Points +34%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	12579 Points +29%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years)	12240 Points +25%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	9786 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	9786 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	9408 Points -4%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	7390 Points -24%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	63432 Points +46%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58232 Points +34%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	55524 Points +28%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	51986 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years)	48087 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	43495 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	43495 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	35141 Points -19%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	32002 Points -26%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	110707 MB/s +5%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years)	107642 MB/s +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	105083 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	105083 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	102731 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	86309 MB/s -18%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67010 MB/s -36%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66447 MB/s -37%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	55915 MB/s -47%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1587 MB/s +139%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years)	1223 MB/s +84%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	1089 MB/s +64%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	961 MB/s +45%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	921 MB/s +38%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	906 MB/s +36%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	665 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	665 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	651 MB/s -2%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	15209 KRay/s +120%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	11242 KRay/s +63%
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years)	10179 KRay/s +48%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9094 KRay/s +32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8556 KRay/s +24%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	7630 KRay/s +11%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	6932 KRay/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	6899 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	6899 KRay/s 0%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	50110 MPixel/s +74%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	37944 MPixel/s +31%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years)	37003 MPixel/s +28%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	29922 MPixel/s +4%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	29206 MPixel/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28865 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	28865 MPixel/s 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28318 MPixel/s -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	27554 MPixel/s -5%

Systemets prestanda

Det välfungerande systemet ger tillräckligt med datorkraft för krävande applikationer som rendering, videoredigering och spel. Överföringshastigheterna för arbetsminnet (DDR5-4800) förblir under potentialen, som en jämförelse med värdena för Asus TUF Gaming A16 visar.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7927 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)	7603 Points +14%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	7556 Points +13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7220 Points +8%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7210 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6926 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	6690 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	6690 Points 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	6126 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	11207 Points +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10844 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)	10739 Points +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10579 Points +9%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10573 Points +9%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10301 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	9736 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	9736 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9726 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10505 Points +29%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9836 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)	9738 Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9674 Points +18%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	9313 Points +14%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9146 Points +12%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9038 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	8167 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	8167 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	11868 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)	11509 Points +13%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	10622 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10558 Points +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10333 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	10219 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	10219 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9585 Points -6%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	6703 Points -34%

CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2114 Points +42%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1937 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=169, last 2 years)	1883 Points +26%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1824 Points +22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1774 Points +19%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1550 Points +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1535 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1489 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1489 Points 0%

CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1949 Points +30%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1857 Points +24%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1804 Points +21%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=169, last 2 years)	1792 Points +20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1715 Points +15%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1517 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1508 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1494 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1494 Points 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2384 Points +55%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=169, last 2 years)	2050 Points +33%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2023 Points +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1990 Points +29%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1800 Points +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1709 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1637 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1538 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1538 Points 0%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1966 Points +46%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1929 Points +44%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1878 Points +40%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=169, last 2 years)	1704 Points +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1388 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1342 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1342 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1337 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1231 Points -8%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5548 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5810 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		6690 poäng
Hjälp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77899 MB/s +61%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	59712 MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years)	59692 MB/s +23%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	59079 MB/s +22%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48529 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	48529 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48432 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	47903 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	44994 MB/s -7%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	84974 MB/s +69%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67235 MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years)	63689 MB/s +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	61609 MB/s +23%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	50259 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	50259 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50111 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	49994 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	47559 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	76412 MB/s +39%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	72541 MB/s +32%
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years)	61895 MB/s +13%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	59900 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	54997 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	54982 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	54982 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54955 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	46966 MB/s -15%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	98.7 ns * -13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.5 ns * -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	90.4 ns * -3%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	89.8 ns * -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	87.7 ns *
Average AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS ()	87.7 ns * -0%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years)	87.1 ns * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	85 ns * +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 ns * +6%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-fördröjning

Det standardiserade latency monitor-testet (webbsurfning, uppspelning av 4k-video, Prime95 in-place large FFTs) visade inte på några avvikelser. Systemet verkar vara lämpligt för video- och ljudredigering i realtid. Framtida programuppdateringar kan leda till förbättringar eller till och med försämringar.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2504.7 μs * -239%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2463.6 μs * -234%
Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1969.3 μs * -167%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1312.1 μs * -78%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1128.7 μs * -53%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7535HS, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	738.5 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Masslagring

Acer utrustar Nitro 16 med en 512 GB SSD (PCIe 4, M.2-2280) från SK Hynix. Den levererar bra datahastigheter men är inte bland de mest högpresterande SSD-modellerna. En negativ aspekt är att prestandan sjunker på grund av termisk strypning. Den bärbara datorn har plats för en andra PCIe Gen 4 SSD.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7015 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2229 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 515.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 311.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 4990 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1311 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 61.77 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 184.6 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	87.6 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	79.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	77.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	75.5 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	73.8 pt
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	67 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	64.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	44.1 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	36.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3520 (3490.23^min - 3519.95^max) MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=196, last 2 years)	3520 MB/s +34%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	3396 (3160.41^min - 3395.84^max) MB/s +30%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3101 (2775.37^min - 3100.52^max) MB/s +18%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (2228 - 4315, n=5)	2947 MB/s +12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2620 (2568.07^min - 2619.97^max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2506 (2484.56^min - 2506.33^max) MB/s -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	2253 (2206.83^min - 2252.55^max) MB/s -14%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1759 (1754.48^min - 1759.3^max) MB/s -33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1759 (1754.48^min - 1759.3^max) MB/s -33%
seq write
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4695 (4459.59^min - 4695.15^max) MB/s +93%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4252 (3845.2^min - 4251.56^max) MB/s +75%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=196, last 2 years)	3793 MB/s +56%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2749 (2612.84^min - 2749.11^max) MB/s +13%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (1505 - 4923, n=5)	2663 MB/s +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2430 (1756.94^min - 2429.93^max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2220 (2186.31^min - 2219.63^max) MB/s -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1671 (1641.02^min - 1670.59^max) MB/s -31%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1554 (1534.35^min - 1553.61^max) MB/s -36%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1554 (1534.35^min - 1553.61^max) MB/s -36%
seq q8 t1 read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7032 (6100.58^min - 7031.96^max) MB/s +23%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6661 (6037.07^min - 6660.97^max) MB/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6638 (5706.05^min - 6638.12^max) MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming (2268 - 16089, n=196, last 2 years)	6348 MB/s +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	5729 (5328.06^min - 5728.58^max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	5035 (4670.78^min - 5034.63^max) MB/s -12%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (3050 - 6418, n=5)	4966 MB/s -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	4294 (3669.6^min - 4293.91^max) MB/s -25%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3886 (3200.77^min - 3885.81^max) MB/s -32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3886 (3200.77^min - 3885.81^max) MB/s -32%
seq q8 t1 write
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	4958 (862.3^min - 4957.61^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4914 (4501.33^min - 4914.49^max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=196, last 2 years)	4779 MB/s -4%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4776 MB/s -4%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (2869 - 4968, n=5)	4160 MB/s -16%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3613 (3580.5^min - 3612.97^max) MB/s -27%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2216 (2187.96^min - 2215.64^max) MB/s -55%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1773 (1734.23^min - 1773.16^max) MB/s -64%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1640 (1630.54^min - 1639.84^max) MB/s -67%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1640 (1630.54^min - 1639.84^max) MB/s -67%
4k q1 t1 read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	76.7 (73.36^min - 76.74^max) MB/s +32%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	72.8 MB/s +25%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=196, last 2 years)	67.6 MB/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	63.2 (62.77^min - 63.18^max) MB/s +8%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (46.2 - 78.3, n=5)	58.6 MB/s +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	58.3 (57.69^min - 58.29^max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	48.4 (47.92^min - 48.42^max) MB/s -17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.8 (32.61^min - 32.76^max) MB/s -44%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.6 (32.27^min - 32.56^max) MB/s -44%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.6 (32.27^min - 32.56^max) MB/s -44%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	391 (373.18^min - 391.21^max) MB/s +102%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	342 (331.18^min - 341.62^max) MB/s +76%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=196, last 2 years)	223 MB/s +15%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (117.2 - 393, n=5)	222 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	201 (197.55^min - 200.57^max) MB/s +4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	193.9 (190.37^min - 193.9^max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	159.6 (158.36^min - 159.58^max) MB/s -18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	132 (125.41^min - 131.99^max) MB/s -32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	129.5 (125.88^min - 129.52^max) MB/s -33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	129.5 (125.88^min - 129.52^max) MB/s -33%
4k q32 t16 read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	3789 (3765.64^min - 3788.53^max) MB/s
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3551 (3544.16^min - 3551.38^max) MB/s -6%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3335 (3259.03^min - 3334.54^max) MB/s -12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3311 (3243.78^min - 3311.19^max) MB/s -13%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (615 - 4255, n=5)	2879 MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=196, last 2 years)	2578 MB/s -32%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1963 (1812.48^min - 1962.92^max) MB/s -48%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1705 (1701.1^min - 1704.63^max) MB/s -55%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	789 (769.77^min - 789.25^max) MB/s -79%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	789 (769.77^min - 789.25^max) MB/s -79%
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3576 (3480.8^min - 3575.55^max) MB/s +182%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3275 (2719.74^min - 3275.22^max) MB/s +159%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2659 (2629.9^min - 2658.76^max) MB/s +110%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2193 (2174.06^min - 2193.44^max) MB/s +73%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=196, last 2 years)	2143 MB/s +69%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (328 - 3869, n=5)	1849 MB/s +46%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1585 (1554.44^min - 1585.47^max) MB/s +25%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1266 (1012.7^min - 1266.22^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	314 (293.25^min - 314.3^max) MB/s -75%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	314 (293.25^min - 314.3^max) MB/s -75%

AS SSD
Score Total
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	8837 Points +48%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8452 Points +41%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	7213 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=184, last 2 years)	6807 Points +14%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	6392 Points +7%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (2811 - 10092, n=5)	6342 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	5988 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	4261 Points -29%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3315 Points -45%
Score Read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3468 Points +21%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3174 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2860 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2712 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2573 Points -10%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (986 - 3412, n=5)	2502 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming (760 - 4721, n=184, last 2 years)	2492 Points -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1830 Points -36%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1116 Points -61%
Score Write
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3723 Points +96%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3621 Points +91%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	3145 Points +66%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=184, last 2 years)	3109 Points +64%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (1346 - 4956, n=5)	2629 Points +38%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2475 Points +30%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1899 Points
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1735 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1604 Points -16%
Seq Read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	5449.25 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5185.49 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=184, last 2 years)	4950 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4887.18 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4540.75 MB/s -17%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (2256 - 5796, n=5)	4339 MB/s -20%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3886.94 MB/s -29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3690.93 MB/s -32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3466 MB/s -36%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4286.27 MB/s +347%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4081.48 MB/s +325%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3900.46 MB/s +306%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3805.55 MB/s +297%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=184, last 2 years)	3638 MB/s +279%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (960 - 4914, n=5)	2972 MB/s +210%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1633.49 MB/s +70%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1295 MB/s +35%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	959.57 MB/s
4K Read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	99.79 MB/s +107%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	97.96 MB/s +103%
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 112.1, n=184, last 2 years)	66.6 MB/s +38%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	62.76 MB/s +30%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	58.79 MB/s +22%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (42.4 - 80.1, n=5)	56.7 MB/s +18%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	48.18 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	42.75 MB/s -11%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	30.4 MB/s -37%
4K Write
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	325.41 MB/s +117%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	286.81 MB/s +91%
Average of class Gaming (96.3 - 512, n=184, last 2 years)	210 MB/s +40%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (109.2 - 307, n=5)	185.4 MB/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	169.41 MB/s +13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	150.14 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	137.9 MB/s -8%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	137.5 MB/s -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	118.17 MB/s -21%
4K-64 Read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2914.54 MB/s +31%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2593.07 MB/s +17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	2216.52 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2146.9 MB/s -3%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2085.99 MB/s -6%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (713 - 2799, n=5)	2002 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (442 - 3475, n=184, last 2 years)	1925 MB/s -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1429.83 MB/s -35%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	739 MB/s -67%
4K-64 Write
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3195.33 MB/s +93%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2915.33 MB/s +76%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2546.59 MB/s +54%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=184, last 2 years)	2538 MB/s +54%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (1064 - 4158, n=5)	2146 MB/s +30%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1779.79 MB/s +8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	1652.79 MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1468 MB/s -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1411.25 MB/s -15%
Access Time Read
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.094 ms * -52%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.079 ms * -27%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	0.066 ms * -6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	0.062 ms *
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.058 ms * +6%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=183, last 2 years)	0.05345 ms * +14%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	0.052 ms * +16%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (0.032 - 0.062, n=5)	0.0446 ms * +28%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.039 ms * +37%
Access Time Write
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.139 ms * -435%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.118 ms * -354%
Average SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N (0.018 - 0.128, n=5)	0.0668 ms * -157%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=184, last 2 years)	0.04716 ms * -81%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.029 ms * -12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N	0.026 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	0.025 ms * +4%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	0.02 ms * +23%
Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.012 ms * +54%

* ... smaller is better

Drive throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N: Ø4012 (3381.19-5725.73)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø3496 (2896.67-3526.02)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8: Ø5260 (1672.91-6655)

Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø5191 (3583.79-7029.65)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø4012 (3504.22-4030.94)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB: Ø5011 (4351.17-5032.96)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø3831 (253.34-6627.38)

Grafikkort

Benchmarkresultaten för GeForce RTX 4050 ligger över de genomsnittliga resultaten för RTX 4050 ("Balanserad"). lägena "Performance" och "Turbo" resulterar i bästa fall i en minimal prestandaökning.

Acer har satt den maximala TGP till 140 W - ett högre wattal är inte möjligt. Enligt testet på Witcher 3 är den inte ens nära att bli utmattad. Att växla mellan dGPU och Optimus kräver ingen omstart eftersom Advanced Optimus stöds.

Fire Strike (Nätdrift, strömförsörjning)

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	99 pt
Average of class Gaming	95.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	85.2 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	80.4 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	78.1 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	75.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	71.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	70.7 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	62.8 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	40995 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=227, last 2 years)	40669 Points +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	33037 Points +8%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	31690 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	30877 Points +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	30717 Points
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	30298 Points -1%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	28934 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13339 - 32642, n=36)	28539 Points -7%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	161152 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	157673 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	155806 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	153301 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=139, last 2 years)	136277 Points -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (51138 - 161152, n=24)	126241 Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	105057 Points -35%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	54830 Points -66%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	29853 Points +29%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=232, last 2 years)	29586 Points +28%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	26154 Points +13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	23204 Points
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	22899 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	22715 Points -2%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	22522 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	22480 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13591 - 24007, n=34)	21045 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=229, last 2 years)	12096 Points +45%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	11868 Points +42%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9203 Points +10%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	8692 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	8626 Points +3%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	8597 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	8363 Points
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	8152 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (5107 - 9040, n=34)	7763 Points -7%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		43233 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance		24596 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		47710 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		20291 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		8227 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	33 Seconds * -27%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	29 Seconds * -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25 - 37, n=35)	29 Seconds * -12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	27 Seconds * -4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	27 Seconds * -4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	27 Seconds * -4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	26 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (9 - 142, n=182, last 2 years)	23.1 Seconds * +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	21 Seconds * +19%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47 - 175, n=35)	56.7 Seconds * -13%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	53 Seconds * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	52 Seconds * -4%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	52 Seconds * -4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50 Seconds * -0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50 Seconds * -0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	50 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=189, last 2 years)	39.2 Seconds * +22%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	35 Seconds * +30%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	481 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (243 - 907, n=35)	400 Seconds * +17%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	399 Seconds * +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	376 Seconds * +22%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	376 Seconds * +22%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	374 Seconds * +22%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	364 Seconds * +24%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=202, last 2 years)	315 Seconds * +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	301 Seconds * +37%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	243 Seconds * +49%

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 226512, n=230, last 2 years)	121419 Points +39%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	117889 Points +35%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	104225 Points +20%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	87554 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	87135 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	86024 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	84557 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (63538 - 90075, n=33)	82182 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	65110 Points -25%
Vulkan Score
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	55994 Points +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	50695 Points
Average of class Gaming (1952 - 160279, n=226, last 2 years)	42623 Points -16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	36222 Points -29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (4586 - 59879, n=33)	27977 Points -45%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	25701 Points -49%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	24341 Points -52%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	20762 Points -59%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	9849 Points -81%

Geekbench 6.0
GPU Vulkan
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	108353 Points +57%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	83464 Points +21%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	68870 Points
Average of class Gaming (1827 - 159996, n=43, last 2 years)	46212 Points -33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (9845 - 103262, n=12)	32694 Points -53%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	28137 Points -59%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	22444 Points -67%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	9845 Points -86%
GPU OpenCL
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	120271 Points +42%
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=44, last 2 years)	116331 Points +38%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	84452 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	83483 Points -1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	81622 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	80466 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (66574 - 84452, n=12)	76353 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	65701 Points -22%

Geekbench 6.2
GPU Vulkan
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	79423 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	77343 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (4286 - 196201, n=74, last 2 years)	73536 Points -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (4454 - 82430, n=16)	47132 Points -41%
GPU OpenCL
Average of class Gaming (4321 - 207373, n=77, last 2 years)	117471 Points +39%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	84723 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	83663 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (60815 - 86892, n=16)	78903 Points -7%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=125, last 2 years)	2046 mpaths +38%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1664 mpaths +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	1503 mpaths +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1485 mpaths
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1465 mpaths -1%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	1458 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1021 - 1588, n=20)	1419 mpaths -4%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	1197 mpaths -19%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=128, last 2 years)	1473 mpaths +37%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1194 mpaths +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	1079 mpaths +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1075 mpaths 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	1073 mpaths
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	1071 mpaths 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (735 - 1123, n=20)	1022 mpaths -5%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	909 mpaths -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	300 mpaths -72%
CPU
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	14401 mpaths +86%
Average of class Gaming (1690 - 26944, n=141, last 2 years)	13556 mpaths +75%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12169 mpaths +57%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	10427 mpaths +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (3562 - 14401, n=20)	10412 mpaths +35%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	10005 mpaths +29%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9623 mpaths +24%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	9406 mpaths +22%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	7731 mpaths

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=184, last 2 years)	603 mpaths +24%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	583 mpaths +20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	507 mpaths +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	501 mpaths +3%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	495 mpaths +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	485 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (333 - 529, n=30)	466 mpaths -4%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	390 mpaths -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	96 mpaths -80%
CPU
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	24181 ksamples +117%
Average of class Gaming (2741 - 37629, n=184, last 2 years)	19394 ksamples +74%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	17623 ksamples +58%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	15817 ksamples +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (5413 - 24181, n=30)	15382 ksamples +38%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	14668 ksamples +32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	14627 ksamples +31%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	14218 ksamples +28%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	11139 ksamples

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Gaming (29.9 - 515, n=23, last 2 years)	292 fps +64%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (177.8 - 188.3, n=3)	184 fps +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	177.8 fps
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	230.8 fps +1161%
Average of class Gaming (2.93 - 231, n=35, last 2 years)	33.1 fps +81%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (18.3 - 21.4, n=4)	20.3 fps +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	18.3 fps
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	17.5 fps -4%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	56.9 fps +100%
Average of class Gaming (23.5 - 59.9, n=35, last 2 years)	38.8 fps +36%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	30 fps +5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	28.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25.7 - 30.1, n=4)	28.3 fps -1%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming (99.8 - 687, n=33, last 2 years)	399 fps +42%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	322.7 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (281 - 334, n=4)	307 fps +9%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	281.4 fps
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	201.6 fps -28%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	53.5 fps +74%
Average of class Gaming (20.6 - 76.5, n=35, last 2 years)	42.8 fps +39%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	30.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (28.2 - 30.7, n=4)	29.2 fps -5%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	20.6 fps -33%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	126.5 fps +60%
Average of class Gaming (44 - 141.9, n=34, last 2 years)	104 fps +31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (79.3 - 94.5, n=4)	87.3 fps +10%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	86.5 fps +9%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	79.3 fps
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	73.4 fps +53%
Average of class Gaming (17.8 - 117.2, n=35, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +47%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	53.9 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47.9 - 50.7, n=4)	49.3 fps +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	47.9 fps
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 221, n=35, last 2 years)	122.4 fps +58%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	89.4 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (76.2 - 79.7, n=4)	78.2 fps +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS	77.6 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	67.5 fps -13%

* ... smaller is better

Spelprestanda

Hårdvaran är utformad för FHD-spel med höga till maximala inställningar. Höga bildfrekvenser vid skärmens FHD-upplösning kan därmed utnyttjas till fullo, och bildfrekvenser över det fastställda RTX 4050-genomsnittet uppnås.

Nvidias DLSS-teknik kan ge en ökning av bildfrekvensen. Om den är aktiv beräknar GPU:n ett spel i en lägre upplösning och skalar sedan upp det till önskad upplösning via AI. DLSS måste uttryckligen stödjas av ett spel. Vi testade några motsvarande titlar på provbasis.

	Raytracing (FHD, Ultra)	Raytracing (FHD, Ultra) + DLSS (kvalitet)	Raytracing (FHD, Ultra) + DLSS (balanserad)	Raytracing (FHD, Ultra) + DLSS (prestanda)
Cyberpunk 2077 V1.6	24,9 fps	43 fps	53,6 fps	58fps
Spider-Man: Miles Morales	42,1 fps	54,2 fps	68,2 fps	68,4fps
The Witcher 3 V4.00	25,4 fps	30,1 f ps	31,9 fps	33,2fps
Hogwarts Legacy	34,9 fps	43,4 f ps	44,5 fps	44,7fps
Returnal	66 fps	81 fps	84 fps	91 fps

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	95.4 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	80.7 pt
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	78.4 pt
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	75.2 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	72.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	72.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71.5 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	70.4 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=224, last 2 years)	117.6 fps +40%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113.2 (98^min) fps +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	98.1 (84^min) fps +17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.9 (71^min) fps
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.4 (75^min) fps -1%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	82.4 (31.1^min, 37.5^P0.1, 50.1^P1) fps -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 (79^min, 80^P1) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (18.5 - 94.7, n=38)	75.2 fps -10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	64 fps -24%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=225, last 2 years)	111.5 fps +34%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	109.1 fps +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	85.2 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	85 fps +2%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	84.7 fps +1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.5 fps
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.6 fps -1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	81.5 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (15.5 - 122.3, n=34)	75.9 fps -9%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=222, last 2 years)	208 fps +42%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	192.6 (25.1^min, 144.3^P1) fps +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	163.3 (16.3^min, 119.3^P1) fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	151.2 (35.6^min, 115.5^P1) fps +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	147 fps 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	146.8 (93.6^min, 114.3^P1) fps
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	146.4 (27.5^min, 106.4^P1) fps 0%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	144 (76^min, 109.9^P1) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (21.2 - 156.6, n=33)	133.5 fps -9%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	160.7 (136.8^min) fps +28%
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=234, last 2 years)	143.8 fps +15%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	142.5 (121.6^min) fps +14%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	137.3 (120.2^min) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (73.5 - 175.6, n=34)	131.6 fps +5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	125.2 (109.9^min) fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	121.6 (100.8^min) fps -3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	115.8 (102.7^min) fps -8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	114.8 (97.8^min) fps -8%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	117 fps +44%
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	104.4 fps +28%
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=239, last 2 years)	102.6 fps +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (65 - 117, n=35)	93.1 fps +14%
Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	86.8 fps +7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	81.4 fps
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77.8 fps -4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	76.3 fps -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	57.3 fps -30%

För att kontrollera om bildfrekvensen förblir i stort sett konstant under en längre period kör vi The Witcher 3 i ca 60 minuter med Full HD-upplösning och maximala kvalitetsinställningar. Spelkaraktären flyttas inte. En minskning av bildfrekvensen märks inte.

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø81.7 (71-84)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S; neu: Ø95.2 (89-101)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø59.6 (19-74)

Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø81 (77-86)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø82.2 (79-84)

Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø80.5 (77-85)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø111.1 (107-116)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	307.8	262.4	156.2	83.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	151	136.5	132.1	125.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	187.4	116.2	83.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	115.3	101.6	81.4
Far Cry 5 (2018)	131	114	108	102
Strange Brigade (2018)	355	209	169.3	146.8
F1 22 (2022)	207	198.1	166.8	52.9

Utsläpp: Acer Nitro 16 värms upp betydligt

Utsläpp av buller

Trots den permanent aktiva dGPU är den bärbara datorn tyst vid daglig användning (kontor, Internet etc.). Som förväntat ser det annorlunda ut i spelläge.

Ljudtrycksnivåer på upp till 61 dB(A) ("Turbo") eller 56 dB(A) ("Performance") kräver användning av hörlurar. Läget "Balanserad" som vi använde lämnar 45 dB(A). En generellt lägre ljudutveckling kan uppnås genom att använda "Quiet"-läget, men på bekostnad av beräkningsprestandan förstås.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		25 / 26 / 27 dB(A)
Hög belastning		42 / 45 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise		-7%	-15%	-26%	10%	-16%	-4%
off / environment *	24	25 -4%	24 -0%	27 -13%	23.3 3%	25 -4%	25.7 -7%
Idle Minimum *	25	25 -0%	24 4%	27 -8%	23.3 7%	26 -4%	25.7 -3%
Idle Average *	26	26 -0%	25.14 3%	35 -35%	23.3 10%	27 -4%	25.7 1%
Idle Maximum *	27	28 -4%	35.14 -30%	38 -41%	23.3 14%	32 -19%	26.3 3%
Load Average *	42	43 -2%	55.93 -33%	52 -24%	29.6 30%	57 -36%	33.9 19%
Witcher 3 ultra *	43	51 -19%	54.62 -27%	56 -30%	43 -0%	50 -16%
Load Maximum *	45	53 -18%	56.34 -25%	59 -31%	43 4%	57 -27%	62 -38%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Nitro 16 värms upp märkbart under belastning. En temperatur på mer än 60 °C uppnås vid en mätpunkt.

Temperaturerna ligger inom den gröna zonen vid daglig användning, men de är högre än i systermodellen på grund av det aktiva dGPU-läget.

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


51 °C	45 °C	48 °C
43 °C	45 °C	43 °C
41 °C	42 °C	41 °C

Max: 51 °C
Medel: 44.3 °C


57 °C	63 °C	46 °C
44 °C	52 °C	43 °C
33 °C	34 °C	34 °C

Max: 63 °C
Medel: 45.1 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 51 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


30 °C	30 °C	29 °C
33 °C	34 °C	34 °C
31 °C	31 °C	32 °C

Max: 34 °C
Medel: 31.6 °C


31 °C	32 °C	31 °C
30 °C	31 °C	30 °C
28 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Max: 32 °C
Medel: 29.4 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 36 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


54 °C	44 °C	45 °C
42 °C	43 °C	42 °C
35 °C	41 °C	39 °C

Max: 54 °C
Medel: 42.8 °C


57 °C	61 °C	48 °C
45 °C	51 °C	41 °C
32 °C	32 °C	33 °C

Max: 61 °C
Medel: 44.4 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 48 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Scout E20 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat		10%	9%	8%	17%	19%	9%
Maximum Upper Side *	51	53 -4%	51 -0%	52 -2%	48.9 4%	41 20%	41.5 19%
Maximum Bottom *	63	48 24%	53 16%	54 14%	44.6 29%	39 38%	51.8 18%
Idle Upper Side *	34	30 12%	29 15%	28 18%	27.1 20%	31 9%	31.6 7%
Idle Bottom *	32	30 6%	30 6%	32 -0%	27.5 14%	29 9%	34.5 -8%

* ... smaller is better

Stresstest

Stresstestet (Prime95 och Furmark i kontinuerlig drift) är ett extremt scenario för att testa systemets stabilitet under full belastning. Processorn startar stresstestet med klockfrekvenser på 4,1 till 4,2 GHz, grafikkärnan körs på 2,3 till 2,4 GHz. Klockfrekvenserna sjunker till 2,6 GHz (processor) och 2,2 GHz (grafikkärna) under testets fortsatta gång.

Högtalare

Stereohögtalarna ger ett hyggligt, i stort sett basfritt ljud. En bättre ljudupplevelse kan uppnås med hörlurar eller externa högtalare.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Krafthantering: Nitro 16 kan uppnå mycket bra drifttider

Energiförbrukning

Strömförbrukningen ligger på en normal nivå för den installerade hårdvaran. DGPU-läget är ansvarigt för den högre tomgångsförbrukningen jämfört med systermodellen. Stresstestet och Witcher 3 -testet körs med konstant strömförbrukning. Den medföljande strömförsörjningen (230 W) kan driva den bärbara datorn fullt ut under belastning.

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.5 / Watt
Låg belastning	19 / 20 / 23 Watt
Hög belastning	80 / 184 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		20%	-32%	-10%	23%	13%	-7%	-13%
Idle Minimum *	19	7 63%	11.4 40%	15 21%	8 58%	5 74%	11.6 39%	13.9 ?(2 - 64, n=178, last 2 years) 27%
Idle Average *	20	10 50%	16.7 16%	17 15%	12.1 39%	11 45%	15.6 22%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=178, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Maximum *	23	15 35%	25.8 -12%	24 -4%	12.5 46%	22 4%	16.5 28%	27.1 ?(9 - 101.1, n=178, last 2 years) -18%
Load Average *	80	86 -8%	139 -74%	111 -39%	74.9 6%	96 -20%	155 -94%	111.6 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years) -40%
Witcher 3 ultra *	125.8	160.6 -28%	265 -111%	174.1 -38%	136.6 -9%	145.2 -15%	154.8 -23%
Load Maximum *	184	172 7%	280 -52%	208 -13%	185 -1%	201 -9%	205 -11%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years) -36%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø125.8 (122.5-130.1)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø148.3 (146.6-151.8)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø20.1 (18.7-23)

Power consumption: External monitor

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø60.4 (57.4-64.1)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103 (100.6-116.5)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø136.8 (123.5-142.4)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø135 (128.8-144.2)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø18.2 (9.17-27)

Batteriets livslängd

Nitro 16 uppnår körtider på 11:00 h och 10:50 h i WLAN-testet (ringer upp webbplatser via ett skript) respektive videotestet (kortfilm Big Buck Bunny FHD H.264-kodning i en loop). Under båda testerna är notebookens energisparfunktioner inaktiverade och skärmens ljusstyrka är inställd på ca 150 cd/m². De trådlösa modulerna är också inaktiverade för videotestet.

Obs: Nitro visar en ökad strömförbrukning i batteriläge under Windows 11 (Acer-installation, egen installation). Som en följd av detta ligger körtiderna lägre än för systermodellen (WLAN: 5,5 vs. 9 h) med samma batterikapacitet. Därför bestämdes körtiderna under Windows 10. Problemet uppstår inte här.

Vi kan inte ange någon orsak till den ökade energiförbrukningen. Det kan vara ett problem med vår testenhet.

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		12tim 01min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 115)		11tim 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10tim 50min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		2tim 14min

	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE R5 7535HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh	Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Medion Erazer Scout E20 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 53.35 Wh	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		9%	-45%	-54%	-12%	-48%	-11%	-37%
Reader / Idle	721	1217 69%		425 -41%		399 -45%	729 1%	539 ?(57 - 1290, n=84, last 2 years) -25%
H.264	650	746 15%		132 -80%	747 15%	277 -57%	614 -6%	397 ?(56 - 747, n=92, last 2 years) -39%
WiFi v1.3	660	745 13%	355 -46%	317 -52%	701 6%	284 -57%	540 -18%	366 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years) -45%
Load	134	52 -61%	77 -43%	76 -43%	59 -56%	89 -34%	105 -22%	83.9 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years) -37%

För

+ Ljusstark WUXGA-skärm i 16:10-format

+ 165 Hz-panel med stöd för G-Sync

+ två PCIe 4-kortplatser (M.2-2280)

+ belyst tangentbord (RGB)

+ Arbetsminnet kan utökas

+ Termisk pasta av flytande metall

+ USB 4

+ Strömförsörjning

+ mycket bra batteritid

Emot

- kan bli högljudd under belastning

- betydande uppvärmning under belastning

- termisk SSD-strypning

- litet lagringsutrymme

Omdöme: Prisvärd ingång till spelvärlden

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE. Granskningsenhet tillhandahållen av Nvidia.

Acer Nitro 16 är utformad för FHD-spel med höga till maximala inställningar men gör också en bra figur inom andra områden (videoredigering, rendering). DenRyzen 5 7535HS och GeForce RTX 4050ger den prestanda som krävs, och CPU och GPU kan arbeta med konstant höga klockfrekvenser.

Acer presenterar en väl avrundad spelbärbar dator i nybörjarsegmentet med Nitro 16.

Överraskande nog värms den bärbara datorn upp mer under belastning än dess systermodell utrustad med mer kraftfull hårdvara. Nitro-modellerna har inte mycket gemensamt när det gäller bullerutveckling. Läget "Balanserad" ger ett måttligt bakgrundsljud.

16-tumsskärmen (WUXGA) är knappast sämre än panelen (WQXGA) i systermodellen. Den senare erbjuder en högre maximal ljusstyrka (400 nits vs. 500 nits). De redan goda körtiderna för Ryzen 7 Nitro överträffas av den nuvarande modellen, även om det bara är under Windows 10. Lagringskapaciteten (512 GB) är i minsta laget för en gaming notebook.

Ett alternativ kan hittas i Asus TUF A15 FA507. Den erbjuder mer CPU-prestanda med något bättre batteritider. Den Gigabyte G7 KE skulle vara ett budgetalternativ där en lägre prestandanivå skulle kompenseras av ett lägre inköpspris (1 050 €). Ett Windows-operativsystem ingår dock inte i leveransen.

Pris och tillgänglighet

I USA kan användare beställa vissa varianter av Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 på Amazon, som har mer kraftfulla konfigurationer än den vi har granskat.

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE - 2023-08-01 08/01/2023 v7
Sascha Mölck

Design

74 / 98 → 76%

Tangentbord

79%

Mus

83%

Anslutningar

69 / 80 → 86%

Vikt

59 / 10-66 → 88%

Batteri

88 / 95 → 93%

Skärm

87%

Spelprestanda

98%

Programprestanda

95%

Temperatur

75 / 95 → 79%

Ljudnivå

82 / 90 → 92%

Audio

81%

Camera

45 / 85 → 52%

Medel

78%

87%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 391930 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Recension: Prisvärd bärbar gamingdator med RTX 4050 och långa drifttider

Sascha Mölck, 2023-08-13 (Update: 2023-08-13)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Recension: Prisvärd bärbar gamingdator med RTX 4050 och långa drifttider

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Storleksjämförelse

Display - 16:10-panel med sRGB-täckning

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Uppträdande: Acer fokuserar på Rembrandt och Ada Lovelace

Testförhållanden

Processor

Cinebench R15 multi-core loop

Systemets prestanda

DPC-fördröjning

Masslagring

Drive throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Grafikkort

Spelprestanda

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Utsläpp: Acer Nitro 16 värms upp betydligt

Utsläpp av buller

Temperatur

Stresstest

Högtalare

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R7YE audio analysis

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS audio analysis

Krafthantering: Nitro 16 kan uppnå mycket bra drifttider

Energiförbrukning

Power consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption: External monitor

Batteriets livslängd

För

Emot

Omdöme: Prisvärd ingång till spelvärlden

Pris och tillgänglighet

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare