Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 – Billig kamerakung (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 12/28/2019

Massor av megapixlar. Stort batteri, kamera med högt antal megapixlar och hög effekt på laddaren. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 kommer med många superlativ, men du får ta ett litet steg bakåt när det kommer till processorns prestanda. Vår detaljerade recension avslöjar huruvida den är värd att köpa.

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Mi Note Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 618
Minne
6144 MB 
Skärm
6.47 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 398 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja, HDR
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, , 117 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infraröd, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.7 x 157.8 x 74.2
Batteri
5260 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix f/​1.69, OIS, quad-LED blixt, video @2160p/​30fps (kamera 1); 20.0MP, f/​2.2, vidvinkelslins (kamera 2); 12.0MP, f/​2.0, teleobjektiv (kamera 3); 5.0MP, f/​2.0, teleobjektiv, OIS (kamera 4); 2.0MP, makrolins (kamera 5)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.0, video @1080p/​30fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på undre kanten, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Snabbladdare, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Silikonfodral, 12 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: 1.107W/​kg (Huvud), 1.392W/​kg (Kropp); LTE: Cat 15 800 Mb/s (Nerladdning), Cat 13 150 Mb/s (Uppladdning), fanless
Vikt
208 g, Strömförsörjning: 114 g
Pris
499 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Jämförelseenheter

RatingratingversionDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionBest Price
83%712/2019Xiaomi Mi Note 10
730G, Adreno 618
208 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
89%608/2019Honor 20
Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10
174 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.26"2340x1080
86%707/2019Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
855, Adreno 640
190 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080
82%706/2019Google Pixel 3a XL
670, Adreno 616
167 g64 GB eMMC Flash6"2160x1080
84%604/2019Sony Xperia 10 Plus
636, Adreno 509
180 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.5"2520x1080
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Xiaomi Mi Note 10

Storleksjämförelse

167 mm 73 mm 8.3 mm 180 g159.1 mm 75.44 mm 9.2 mm 190 g160.1 mm 76.1 mm 8.2 mm 167 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g154.25 mm 73.97 mm 7.87 mm 174 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
668 (min: 617, max: 692) MBit/s ∼100% +102%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
447 (min: 201, max: 659) MBit/s ∼67% +35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
331 (min: 317, max: 341) MBit/s ∼50%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
317 (min: 163, max: 343) MBit/s ∼47% -4%
Honor 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
302 (min: 80, max: 331) MBit/s ∼45% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=479)
235 MBit/s ∼35% -29%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
580 (min: 548, max: 602) MBit/s ∼100% +77%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
523 (min: 410, max: 563) MBit/s ∼90% +60%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
327 (min: 321, max: 333) MBit/s ∼56%
Honor 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 235, max: 335) MBit/s ∼51% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=479)
222 MBit/s ∼38% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
153 (min: 133, max: 180) MBit/s ∼26% -53%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø331 (317-341)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø327 (321-333)
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Vändpunkt
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Vändpunkt
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Bro
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Bro
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 GPS – Översikt
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 GPS – Översikt
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 GPS – Vändpunkt
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 GPS – Vändpunkt
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 GPS – Bro
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 GPS – Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Exempel: Macrokamera
Exempel: Macrokamera
Exempel: Vidvinkelskamera
Exempel: Huvudkamera
Exempel: Teleobjektiv 1
Exempel: Teleobjektiv 2
ColorChecker Photo
21.7 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10: 19.95 ∆E min: 7.7 - max: 38.44 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
7.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10: 6.09 ∆E min: 1.54 - max: 11.16 ∆E
Testkarta – Perfekt belysning
Testkarta – Perfekt belysning
Testkarta – 1 lux
587
cd/m²
612
cd/m²
637
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
589
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 637 cd/m² Medel: 606.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.46 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 625 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.38 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
137.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.251
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Honor 20
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.26
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.4
Google Pixel 3a XL
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
IPS, 2520x1080, 6.5
Screen
29%
-4%
23%
-30%
Brightness middle
625
481
-23%
569
-9%
409
-35%
572
-8%
Brightness
607
481
-21%
537
-12%
410
-32%
580
-4%
Brightness Distribution
89
95
7%
79
-11%
96
8%
96
8%
Black Level *
0.55
0.31
0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.38
1.1
75%
3.5
20%
1.3
70%
4.5
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.83
2.1
69%
6
12%
2.3
66%
12.2
-79%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.1
1.3
68%
5.1
-24%
1.5
63%
7.9
-93%
Gamma
2.251 98%
2.12 104%
2.36 93%
2.22 99%
2.16 102%
CCT
7251 90%
6442 101%
6827 95%
6621 98%
8726 74%
Contrast
875
1835
1430

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 215.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 215.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 215.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13560 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
891 Points ∼66%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
639 Points ∼48% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (891 - 930, n=2)
911 Points ∼68% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3222, n=41)
1345 Points ∼100% +51%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1128 Points ∼63%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
737 Points ∼41% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1123 - 1128, n=2)
1126 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=47)
1789 Points ∼100% +59%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1723 Points ∼92%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1322 Points ∼70% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1723 - 1729, n=2)
1726 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=59)
1883 Points ∼100% +9%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
543 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
344 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (543 - 543, n=2)
543 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=59)
537 Points ∼99% -1%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7558 Points ∼77%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7945 Points ∼81% +5%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9814 Points ∼100% +30%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7377 Points ∼75% -2%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6018 Points ∼61% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (7551 - 7558, n=2)
7555 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=414)
5417 Points ∼55% -28%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
9052 Points ∼69%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9825 Points ∼75% +9%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
13047 Points ∼100% +44%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
9397 Points ∼72% +4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7181 Points ∼55% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (9052 - 9240, n=2)
9146 Points ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=578)
5888 Points ∼45% -35%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2768 Points ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2106 Points ∼76% -24%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2492 Points ∼90% -10%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2314 Points ∼84% -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2282 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2752 - 2768, n=2)
2760 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=87)
2660 Points ∼96% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2153 Points ∼37%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2232 Points ∼39% +4%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5747 Points ∼100% +167%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1416 Points ∼25% -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
809 Points ∼14% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2145 - 2153, n=2)
2149 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=87)
2655 Points ∼46% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2265 Points ∼51%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2203 Points ∼49% -3%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4454 Points ∼100% +97%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1550 Points ∼35% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
944 Points ∼21% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2256 - 2265, n=2)
2261 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=87)
2439 Points ∼55% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3188 Points ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2540 Points ∼79% -20%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2840 Points ∼89% -11%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2532 Points ∼79% -21%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2345 Points ∼73% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3188 - 3202, n=2)
3195 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=421)
2010 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2425 Points ∼34%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3062 Points ∼43% +26%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7069 Points ∼100% +192%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1612 Points ∼23% -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
862 Points ∼12% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2425 - 2492, n=2)
2459 Points ∼35% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=421)
1808 Points ∼26% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2561 Points ∼48%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2928 Points ∼55% +14%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5311 Points ∼100% +107%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1754 Points ∼33% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1003 Points ∼19% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2561 - 2567, n=2)
2564 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=422)
1684 Points ∼32% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3193 Points ∼68%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2598 Points ∼55% -19%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4703 Points ∼100% +47%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2495 Points ∼53% -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2352 Points ∼50% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3155 - 3193, n=2)
3174 Points ∼67% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=450)
1920 Points ∼41% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3646 Points ∼35%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3459 Points ∼34% -5%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10290 Points ∼100% +182%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2537 Points ∼25% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1397 Points ∼14% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3646 - 3648, n=2)
3647 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=450)
2418 Points ∼23% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3535 Points ∼43%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3222 Points ∼40% -9%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8141 Points ∼100% +130%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2528 Points ∼31% -28%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1536 Points ∼19% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3522 - 3535, n=2)
3529 Points ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=450)
2039 Points ∼25% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3171 Points ∼73%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3685 Points ∼85% +16%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4320 Points ∼100% +36%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2466 Points ∼57% -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2351 Points ∼54% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3171 - 3202, n=2)
3187 Points ∼74% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=501)
1916 Points ∼44% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2237 Points ∼35%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4184 Points ∼66% +87%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6336 Points ∼100% +183%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1487 Points ∼23% -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
808 Points ∼13% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2237 - 2245, n=2)
2241 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=501)
1503 Points ∼24% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2394 Points ∼42%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4062 Points ∼71% +70%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5705 Points ∼100% +138%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1631 Points ∼29% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
946 Points ∼17% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2394 - 2405, n=2)
2400 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=502)
1450 Points ∼25% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3191 Points ∼72%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3557 Points ∼80% +11%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4454 Points ∼100% +40%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2489 Points ∼56% -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2349 Points ∼53% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3191 - 3228, n=2)
3210 Points ∼72% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=542)
1782 Points ∼40% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3498 Points ∼35%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3292 Points ∼33% -6%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9973 Points ∼100% +185%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2428 Points ∼24% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1327 Points ∼13% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3485 - 3498, n=2)
3492 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=541)
1979 Points ∼20% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼44%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3347 Points ∼43% -2%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7820 Points ∼100% +128%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2441 Points ∼31% -29%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1469 Points ∼19% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3424 - 3425, n=2)
3425 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=544)
1713 Points ∼22% -50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
22054 Points ∼65%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
22337 Points ∼66% +1%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33697 Points ∼100% +53%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
14631 Points ∼43% -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
22054 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=701)
14394 Points ∼43% -35%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
51267 Points ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
43622 Points ∼85% -15%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
35596 Points ∼69% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
51267 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=699)
22589 Points ∼44% -56%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39608 Points ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
35999 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
26999 Points ∼68% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
39608 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=699)
18255 Points ∼46% -54%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼50%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
69 fps ∼41% -18%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +99%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
58 fps ∼35% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼21% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
84 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=714)
38.7 fps ∼23% -54%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
56 fps ∼93% -7%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
53 fps ∼88% -12%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
30 fps ∼50% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=723)
28.5 fps ∼48% -52%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼42%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
41 fps ∼42% 0%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97 fps ∼100% +137%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29 fps ∼30% -29%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼16% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
41 fps ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=619)
22.4 fps ∼23% -45%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼63%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
57 fps ∼95% +50%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +58%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
28 fps ∼47% -26%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
13 fps ∼22% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
38 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=628)
19.7 fps ∼33% -48%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼43%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
25 fps ∼36% -17%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +130%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
20 fps ∼29% -33%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼14% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
30 fps ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=484)
18.2 fps ∼26% -39%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼47%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
24 fps ∼42% -11%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼100% +111%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
19 fps ∼33% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
8.4 fps ∼15% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
27 fps ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=486)
17 fps ∼30% -37%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼42%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
21 fps ∼88% +110%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +140%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7.2 fps ∼30% -28%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
3.2 fps ∼13% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (10 - 10, n=2)
10 fps ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=212)
9.95 fps ∼41% 0%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼63%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
14 fps ∼88% +40%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +60%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
4.5 fps ∼28% -55%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.2 fps ∼14% -78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6.7 - 10, n=2)
8.35 fps ∼52% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=211)
6.88 fps ∼43% -31%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼44%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼86% +94%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼100% +125%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼31% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4.9 fps ∼14% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (16 - 16, n=2)
16 fps ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=216)
14.7 fps ∼41% -8%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼43%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
32 fps ∼76% +78%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +133%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼29% -33%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.1 fps ∼15% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (18 - 18, n=2)
18 fps ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=216)
16.4 fps ∼39% -9%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼40%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
17 fps ∼40% 0%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +147%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼26% -35%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼15% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
17 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=409)
12.4 fps ∼30% -27%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼42%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
15 fps ∼42% 0%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼100% +140%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼31% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.1 fps ∼14% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
15 fps ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=413)
11.1 fps ∼31% -26%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1237 Points ∼94%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1281 Points ∼97% +4%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1321 Points ∼100% +7%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1186 Points ∼90% -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1046 Points ∼79% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
1237 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=650)
767 Points ∼58% -38%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3878 Points ∼41%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6681 Points ∼71% +72%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9416 Points ∼100% +143%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2815 Points ∼30% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1611 Points ∼17% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
3878 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=650)
2126 Points ∼23% -45%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4281 Points ∼57%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5683 Points ∼76% +33%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7500 Points ∼100% +75%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
3316 Points ∼44% -23%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1236 Points ∼16% -71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
4281 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=650)
1571 Points ∼21% -63%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6445 Points ∼71%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7639 Points ∼84% +19%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9094 Points ∼100% +41%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5507 Points ∼61% -15%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4342 Points ∼48% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
6445 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=650)
3061 Points ∼34% -53%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3392 Points ∼63%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4390 Points ∼81% +29%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5397 Points ∼100% +59%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2794 Points ∼52% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1734 Points ∼32% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
3392 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=650)
1535 Points ∼28% -55%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
49376 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
37207 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
49376 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 82947, n=35)
42935 Points ∼87% -13%
MEM (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
51664 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
36690 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
51664 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (24176 - 100390, n=35)
49142 Points ∼95% -5%
GPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
70647 Points ∼82%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
49142 Points ∼57% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
70647 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 209164, n=35)
86043 Points ∼100% +22%
CPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
94730 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
67765 Points ∼72% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
94730 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40620 - 168185, n=35)
92147 Points ∼97% -3%
Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
266417 Points ∼99%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
190804 Points ∼71% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
266417 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 534558, n=35)
270267 Points ∼100% +1%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
59.651 Points ∼100% +30%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
49.159 Points ∼82% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
46.038 Points ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
46 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=118)
36.3 Points ∼61% -21%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
32.083 Points ∼54% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
25.96 Points ∼44% -44%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
112.17 Points ∼100% +42%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
97.57 Points ∼87% +23%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
79.228 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
79.2 Points ∼71% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
57.573 Points ∼51% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=547)
42.7 Points ∼38% -46%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
66.7 runs/min ∼100% +54%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
58.3 runs/min ∼87% +35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
43.3 runs/min ∼65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
43.3 runs/min ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=106)
40 runs/min ∼60% -8%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
32.5 runs/min ∼49% -25%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
27.4 runs/min ∼41% -37%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
108 Points ∼100% +40%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
86 Points ∼80% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
77 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
77 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=179)
67.4 Points ∼62% -12%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼57% -19%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
54 Points ∼50% -30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
24313 Points ∼100% +50%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
21358 Points ∼88% +32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
16241 Points ∼67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
16241 Points ∼67% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
11056 Points ∼45% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
8163 Points ∼34% -50%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=708)
6954 Points ∼29% -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=733)
10398 ms * ∼100% -275%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
4739 ms * ∼46% -71%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
3360.7 ms * ∼32% -21%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
3098.1 ms * ∼30% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
2770 ms * ∼27% -0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
2769.8 ms * ∼27%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
2029.5 ms * ∼20% +27%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi Note 10Honor 20Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KLGoogle Pixel 3a XLSony Xperia 10 PlusAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
34%
33%
-25%
-43%
-9%
-58%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
58.44 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
57 (33.6 - 70.2, n=11)
49.8 (1.7 - 87.1, n=450)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
87.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
74.4 (54 - 86, n=11)
68.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=450)
Random Write 4KB
118.9
156.98
32%
160.18
35%
86.96
-27%
16.77
-86%
83.2 (13.5 - 180, n=15)
-30%
24 (0.14 - 259, n=777)
-80%
Random Read 4KB
106.2
156.7
48%
153.29
44%
92.12
-13%
77.67
-27%
119 (88.4 - 173, n=15)
12%
49.4 (1.59 - 226, n=777)
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB
243.6
196.41
-19%
195.6
-20%
179.09
-26%
205.19
-16%
193 (143 - 257, n=15)
-21%
101 (2.99 - 590, n=777)
-59%
Sequential Read 256KB
480.5
829.3
73%
831.4
73%
315.6
-34%
280.34
-42%
490 (409 - 733, n=15)
2%
283 (12.1 - 1781, n=777)
-41%
010203040506070Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.32.1.2: Ø60.4 (44-61)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.32.1.2: Ø60.5 (58-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.9.3a: Ø29.5 (20-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.9.3a: Ø29.5 (23-31)
; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.20.0: Ø58.1 (48-61)
; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.20.0: Ø58.4 (41-61)
Hög belastning
 36.1 °C39.3 °C38.9 °C 
 36.7 °C38.5 °C38.6 °C 
 36.5 °C37.9 °C37.9 °C 
Max: 39.3 °C
Medel: 37.8 °C
36.4 °C38.5 °C35.9 °C
36.6 °C36.8 °C36.1 °C
37.3 °C36.6 °C35.6 °C
Max: 38.5 °C
Medel: 36.6 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  41.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.946.32542.343.93134.834.6403939.15040.842.66334.4358028.127.110025.125.112523.627.816022.137.120020.244.925019.650.231518.456.440018.960.550020.163.66302065.280017.566.3100016.175125015.576.2160017.874.320001673250015.971.4315016.172.3400016.363.4500016.564.8630016.572.1800016.970.91000016.663.9125001764.51600016.555SPL67.866.429.383.6N20.818.51.255.5median 17median 64.5Delta1.710.436.732.237.133.328.129.927.624.337.538.122.925.323.827.321.324.519.130.218.444.417.946.117.752.417.959.214.658.715.95915.263.716.264.91469.51570.114.76814.470.314.672.814.271.314.770.314.669.914.967.215.163.615.158.414.851.115.136.927.2810.947.9median 15.1median 63.61.411.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi Note 10Honor 20
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 20 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.8 / 2.2 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.2 / 7.5 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Honor 20
3750 mAh
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 3a XL
3700 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-8%
-14%
24%
5%
0%
6%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.88
-26%
0.81
-16%
0.7
-0%
0.68
3%
0.7
-0%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=800)
-26%
Idle Average *
1.8
2.27
-26%
2.35
-31%
1.63
9%
2.12
-18%
1.8
-0%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=799)
3%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
2.34
-6%
2.37
-8%
1.67
24%
2.17
1%
2.2
-0%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=800)
8%
Load Average *
5.2
4.81
7%
5.33
-3%
2.64
49%
3.82
27%
5.2
-0%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=794)
22%
Load Maximum *
7.5
6.63
12%
8.55
-14%
4.62
38%
6.44
14%
7.5
-0%
5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=794)
21%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
35tim 34min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18tim 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23tim 43min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
6tim 27min
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Honor 20
3750 mAh
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 3a XL
3700 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-47%
7%
-28%
-47%
Reader / Idle
2134
1262
-41%
2114
-1%
1822
-15%
1400
-34%
H.264
1423
606
-57%
2138
50%
960
-33%
701
-51%
WiFi v1.3
1127
654
-42%
801
-29%
709
-37%
635
-44%
Load
387
208
-46%
409
6%
289
-25%
154
-60%

För

+ Riktigt skarpa kamerabilder
+ 5x optisk zoom
+ Ljusstark AMOLED-skärm
+ 3.5 mm ljudanslutning
+ Batteriet håller i evigheter
+ Snabb laddning
+ Väldigt låg värmeutveckling
+ Tryckkänslig skärm med hög precision
+ Utmärkt förhållande mellan pris och prestanda

Emot

- Foton tagna vid låg ljusnivå har för låg dynamisk vidd
- Huvudkamerans oskärpa ser artificiell ut
- Endast 12 månaders garanti
- Ingen microSD-kortläsare
- Medioker samtalskvalitet
- Ganska tung
Recension av Xiaomi Mi Note 10. Recensionsex från:
Recension av Xiaomi Mi Note 10. Recensionsex från:

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 imponerar ganska ordentligt på en del områden: För under 5.000 kronor får du en utmärkt och väldigt flexibel smartphonekamera som får poäng för riktigt hög skärpa, utmärkt detaljåtergivning och bra färger. Den ljusstarka AMOLED-skärmen tilltalade oss också, den har en lämplig mängd lagring och har du hörlurar med sladd hemma får du också valuta för pengarna tack vare en 3.5 mm ljudanslutning.

När det kommer till kommunikationsmodulerna börjar man märka att man inte befinner sig i det absoluta toppskiktet: Den maximala LTE-hastigheten är bra, men den är betydligt långsammare än på aktuella toppskiktsenheter. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 håller heller inte jämna steg när det kommer till WiFi och den saknar dessutom en microSD-kortläsare.

Men framför allt är lägre prestanda ett problem för den som vill använda riktigt krävande appar: Mi Note 10 är helt enkelt i en långsammare klass. Varför valde Xiaomi en långsammare SoC när exempelvis Asus ZenFone 6 bevisar att det går att få en Snapdragon 855 för det här priset? Det beror troligen på att 730G passar kamerauppsättningen bättre.

En utmärkt kamera och en riktigt ljusstark AMOLED-skärm till ett lågt pris: Om du klarar dig med en aning lägre prestanda bör Xiaomi Mi Note 10 vara ditt förstahandsval.

Om man tänker på priset finns det knappast några bättre alternativ just nu om du letar efter en av de bästa kamerorna och riktigt lång batteritid.

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 - 12/20/2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design
86%
Tangentbord
69 / 75 → 92%
Mus
96%
Anslutningar
48 / 70 → 69%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
85%
Spelprestanda
28 / 64 → 44%
Programprestanda
68 / 86 → 79%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
74%
Medel
77%
83%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 – Billig kamerakung (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2019-12-28 (Update: 2019-12-28)