Test: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite – Pris/prestanda-hit (Sammanfattning)

Name: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Brand: Xiaomi

Underskattad. Eftersom Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite är nästan lika kraftfull och utrustad med nästan samma funktioner som sitt toppskikts-syskon Mi Note 10 är "Lite"-tillägget mer förvirrande än informativt. Det är bara kameramodulen som Xiaomi har ändrat, som nu har en upplösning på 64 MP istället för 108 MP. Men Mi Note 10 Lite är också betydligt billigare - så på så sätt passar det att den heter "Lite".

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 08/11/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Mi Note Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 618

Minne

6 GB

, LPDDR4X

Skärm

6.47 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 398 PPI, Kapacitiv, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, FHD+, 3D curved, HDR10, glansig: ja, HDR, 60 Hz

Hårddisk

64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB

, 108.6 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Fingeravtrycksläsare, Vibrationsmotor, IR-sändare, Ljussensor, Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Elektronisk kompass, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, USB OTB, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display, DRM Widevine L1

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (Band 2, 3, 5, 8), UMTS (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41), SAR (Huvud) 1,011 W/kg, SAR (Kropp) 1,385 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.67 x 157.8 x 74.2

Batteri

5260 mAh Litiumpolymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operativsystem

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix Fyrdubbel kamera: 64 MP huvudkamera (Sony IMX686, f/1.89, 1/1.73", 0.8 µm) + 8 MP ultra-vidvinkelskamera (f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12 µm) + 5 MP djupsensor (f/2.4, 1/1.5", 1.12 µm) + 2 MP makrokamera (f/2.4, 1/1.4", 1.75 µm), Video i upp till 4K@30FPS
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.48, 1/3.06" 1.0 µm, Video i upp till 1080p@30FPS

Övrigt

Högtalare: Monohögtalare på undersidan, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Modulär laddare på 30 Watt, USB-kabel (Typ C till Typ A), Hörlurar, SIM-verktyg, Skyddsfodral, Användarguide, Garantikort, MIUI 11, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless

Vikt

204 g, Strömförsörjning: 85 g

Pris

400 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Testgrupp

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
82.9 %	08/2020	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite SD 730G, Adreno 618	204 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.47"	2340x1080
82.3 %	07/2020	Huawei P40 Lite 5G Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6	189 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
81.2 %	10/2019	Oppo Reno2 SD 730G, Adreno 618	189 g	256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
79.8 %	01/2020	Samsung Galaxy A51 Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3	172 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
83.3 %	12/2019	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 SD 730G, Adreno 618	208 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.47"	2340x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Oppo Reno2 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	355 (187^min - 387^max) MBit/s +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	327 (321^min - 333^max) MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	324 (310^min - 330^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A51 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	297 (189^min - 335^max) MBit/s -8%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	255 (234^min - 277^max) MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AX12
Oppo Reno2 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	618 (532^min - 671^max) MBit/s +81%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	341 (334^min - 349^max) MBit/s
Huawei P40 Lite 5G Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	333 (319^min - 345^max) MBit/s -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	331 (317^min - 341^max) MBit/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	298 (185^min - 350^max) MBit/s -13%

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (334-349)

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø324 (310-330)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Szene 1 Tageslicht-Szene 2 Weitwinkel Lowlight

click to load images

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: 7.38 ∆E min: 1.19 - max: 16.03 ∆E


598 cd/m²	596 cd/m²	615 cd/m²
595 cd/m²	605 cd/m²	623 cd/m²
605 cd/m²	612 cd/m²	626 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 626 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 608.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.81 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 605 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.211

	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47	Huawei P40 Lite 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50	Oppo Reno2 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50	Samsung Galaxy A51 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen		-80%	-132%	-105%	-153%
Brightness middle	605	466 -23%	679 12%	589 -3%	625 3%
Brightness	608	457 -25%	683 12%	589 -3%	607 0%
Brightness Distribution	95	91 -4%	98 3%	94 -1%	89 -6%
Black Level *		0.61
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.84	2.2 -162%	3.5 -317%	2.22 -164%	4.38 -421%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.8	4.6 -156%	6.8 -278%	8.24 -358%	6.83 -279%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.3	2.7 -108%	4.2 -223%	2.6 -100%	4.1 -215%
Gamma	2.211 ^100%	2.24 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.111 ^104%	2.251 ^98%
CCT	6310 ^103%	6633 ^98%	6532 ^100%	6508 ^100%	7251 ^90%
Contrast		764

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

176.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 176.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 176.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	547 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	642 Points +17%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	547 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	543 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (523 - 551, n=6)	543 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)	913 Points +67%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1690 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	2434 Points +44%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	1762 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1727 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1646 - 1786, n=6)	1729 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)	2996 Points +77%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1090 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	Points -100%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	1080 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1127 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (1080 - 1127, n=3)	1099 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (516 - 18876, n=46, last 2 years)	7173 Points +558%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	903 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	2137 Points +137%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	812 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	920 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (812 - 920, n=3)	878 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 18656, n=52, last 2 years)	7719 Points +755%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	8941 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	13099 Points +47%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	9145 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	6416 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	9052 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (8941 - 10200, n=7)	9376 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +69%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	7628 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	9527 Points +25%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	7134 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5649 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	7558 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (7134 - 8683, n=7)	7679 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +43%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	39491 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	52715 Points +33%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	33007 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23866 Points -40%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	39608 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (33007 - 39608, n=5)	37271 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	53194 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	57067 Points +7%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	50829 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	25086 Points -53%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	51267 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (50829 - 53548, n=5)	52404 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	20767 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	41610 Points +100%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	14820 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	20393 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	22054 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (14820 - 22054, n=5)	18710 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3594 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	5516 Points +53%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3399 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2068 Points -42%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3425 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3399 - 3594, n=7)	3490 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3610 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	6158 Points +71%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3504 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2027 Points -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3498 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3485 - 3678, n=7)	3561 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3294 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4042 Points +23%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3075 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2225 Points -32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3191 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3075 - 3371, n=7)	3254 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3594 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	5853 Points +63%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3513 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2060 Points -43%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3535 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3513 - 3704, n=7)	3598 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +160%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3751 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	6327 Points +69%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3647 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1993 Points -47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3646 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3646 - 3773, n=7)	3710 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +336%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3134 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4637 Points +48%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3112 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2336 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3193 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3112 - 3390, n=7)	3238 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2459 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4608 Points +87%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2388 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1592 Points -35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2394 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2388 - 2489, n=7)	2434 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)	2755 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2298 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4804 Points +109%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2243 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1473 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2237 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2237 - 2310, n=7)	2270 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)	2751 Points +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3257 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4031 Points +24%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3088 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2217 Points -32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3171 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3088 - 3350, n=7)	3235 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)	3163 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2577 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4845 Points +88%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2565 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1654 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2561 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2561 - 2701, n=7)	2602 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)	6737 Points +161%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2466 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4906 Points +99%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2434 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1530 Points -38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2425 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2425 - 2492, n=7)	2461 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)	9723 Points +294%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3058 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4642 Points +52%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	3162 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2311 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3188 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (3058 - 3391, n=7)	3241 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)	4224 Points +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2244 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4204 Points +87%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2244 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1554 Points -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2265 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2244 - 2310, n=7)	2267 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6439, n=99, last 2 years)	2671 Points +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2143 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	4544 Points +112%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2155 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1438 Points -33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2153 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2143 - 2199, n=7)	2162 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=99, last 2 years)	2850 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2686 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	3331 Points +24%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	2621 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2161 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2768 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2621 - 2775, n=7)	2727 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 3525, n=99, last 2 years)	2675 Points 0%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	60 fps 0%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	40 fps -33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (55 - 60, n=6)	58.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +41%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	83 fps
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	112 fps +35%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	85 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	46 fps -45%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	84 fps +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (83 - 86, n=6)	84.5 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +198%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	39 fps
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	55 fps +41%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	36 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23 fps -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (25 - 39, n=6)	35.7 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +85%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	69 fps +68%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	42 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	24 fps -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (41 - 42, n=6)	41.5 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +243%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	29 fps
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	40 fps +38%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	26 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps -52%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16 - 29, n=6)	25.5 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +110%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	47 fps +57%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	30 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	15 fps -50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (30 - 30, n=6)	30 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +230%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	23 fps +35%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	15 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.6 fps -49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (9.7 - 17, n=6)	14.8 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +155%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	27 fps +59%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	17 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (17 - 17, n=6)	17 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +252%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	26 fps +53%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	16 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9.1 fps -46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (10 - 17, n=7)	15.4 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years)	44 fps +159%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	31 fps +72%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	18 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16 - 18, n=7)	17.7 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years)	64.3 fps +257%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	17 fps +55%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	10 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5.5 fps -50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (6.5 - 11, n=7)	9.79 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years)	32.8 fps +198%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6.7 fps
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	12 fps +79%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	6.7 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.5 fps -48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (6.3 - 10, n=7)	7.09 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years)	25.6 fps +282%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	273255 Points
Huawei P40 Lite 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144	369207 Points +35%
Oppo Reno2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192	260154 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	181295 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	266417 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (251673 - 275660, n=6)	266066 Points -3%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +130%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	54.8 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 50.6, n=6)	47.3 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	46.15 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	46.04 Points 0%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)	45.82 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	27.68 Points -40%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points +27%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	96.3 Points +17%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)	84 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=6)	84 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	82.3 Points
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	79.2 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	51.3 Points -38%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +165%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	49.5 runs/min +23%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)	43.6 runs/min +8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	43.3 runs/min +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=6)	42.7 runs/min +6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	40.4 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	29.1 runs/min -28%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +90%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	115 Points +64%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	77 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	70 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=6)	69.8 Points 0%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)	66 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	57 Points -19%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)	33503 Points +107%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	19727 Points +22%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)	17345 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=6)	16793 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	16241 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	16197 Points
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	10194 Points -37%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	4375 ms * -49%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)	3054 ms * -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)	2941 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=6)	2898 ms * +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	2770 ms * +6%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)	2254 ms * +23%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +46%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite	Huawei P40 Lite 5G	Oppo Reno2	Samsung Galaxy A51	Xiaomi Mi Note 10	Average 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		44%	-22%	-12%	-4%	-16%	206%
Sequential Read 256KB	501	905 81%	469.3 -6%	496.1 -1%	480.5 -4%	512 ?(272 - 687, n=17) 2%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 201%
Sequential Write 256KB	213.2	188 -12%	201.8 -5%	184.9 -13%	243.6 14%	180.8 ?(94.2 - 251, n=17) -15%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 424%
Random Read 4KB	134.6	146.1 9%	144.2 7%	110.8 -18%	106.2 -21%	114.2 ?(60.6 - 157.2, n=17) -15%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 84%
Random Write 4KB	125.8	249.7 98%	22 -83%	104.4 -17%	118.9 -5%	80.1 ?(13.6 - 195.8, n=17) -36%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 116%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		83.3 ?(NM Card)	74.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	73 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		73.4 ?(36.8 - 85.4, n=10)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		67.7 ?(NM Card)	53.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	60.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		55.4 ?(33.3 - 65.3, n=10)

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite; PUBG Mobile; 0.19.0: Ø29.6 (10-31)

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.3.4a: Ø29.8 (24-31)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


37.3 °C	40.1 °C	39.4 °C
37.6 °C	39.3 °C	39.8 °C
37.6 °C	38.5 °C	39.1 °C

Max: 40.1 °C
Medel: 38.7 °C


35.1 °C	36.8 °C	36.6 °C
35.3 °C	36 °C	35.6 °C
36.6 °C	36.9 °C	35.1 °C

Max: 36.9 °C
Medel: 36 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 37.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 67.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 67.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 67.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (118.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0 / 0.2 Watt
Låg belastning	0.8 / 1.1 / 1.8 Watt
Hög belastning	3.7 / 6.1 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh	Huawei P40 Lite 5G 4000 mAh	Oppo Reno2 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A51 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-24%	-7%	-23%	-28%	-28%	-24%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	0.65 19%	0.7 12%	0.9 -13%	0.7 12%	0.84 ?(0.49 - 1.55, n=6) -5%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -12%
Idle Average *	1.1	2.25 -105%	1.25 -14%	1.7 -55%	1.8 -64%	1.953 ?(0.96 - 4.91, n=6) -78%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -32%
Idle Maximum *	1.8	2.29 -27%	1.36 24%	1.8 -0%	2.2 -22%	2.26 ?(1 - 5.02, n=6) -26%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 9%
Load Average *	3.7	3.7 -0%	5.38 -45%	5.2 -41%	5.2 -41%	4.51 ?(3.11 - 5.38, n=6) -22%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -50%
Load Maximum *	6.1	6.46 -6%	6.71 -10%	6.6 -8%	7.5 -23%	6.63 ?(5.23 - 7.5, n=6) -9%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -36%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		37tim 29min
WiFi Websurfing		18tim 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		22tim 50min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		5tim 37min

	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh	Huawei P40 Lite 5G 4000 mAh	Oppo Reno2 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A51 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh
Battery Runtime		-4%	-24%	-28%	4%
Reader / Idle	2249		2533 13%	1689 -25%	2134 -5%
H.264	1370		1125 -18%	846 -38%	1423 4%
WiFi v1.3	1095	1047 -4%	616 -44%	698 -36%	1127 3%
Load	337		185 -45%	289 -14%	387 15%

För

+ Högkvalitativ konstruktion

+ Böjd skärm

+ Ljusstark AMOLED-skärm

+ Tar bra bilder i dagsljus

+ Ingen strypning

+ Bra spelprestanda

+ Riktigt lång batteritid

+ Snabb laddning

Emot

- Halkigt glashölje

- Mediokra bilder vid låg ljusnivå

- Ingen microSD-plats

- Saknar IP-certifiering

Omdöme - Funktionalitet över genomsnittet till ett lågt pris

Recension av Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Recensionsex från

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

"Utmärkt kamera, små kompromisser", det summerar omdömet vi gav Xiaomi Mi Note 10. Med det som utgångspunkt blir omdömet för Mi Note 10 Lite istället: Fortfarande en bra kamera och inga andra kompromisser jämfört med Mi Note 10.

Lite-versionen har allt som gjorde toppskikts-motsvarigheten bra: Utmärkt konstruktionskvalitet, en ljusstark AMOLED-skärm, extremt lång batteritid, snabb laddning, en snabb åttakärnig SoC samt sist men inte minst, riktigt bra prestanda i förhållande till priset.

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite ligger över genomsnittet för en mittenskiktstelefon och det är bara kameran som inte riktigt kan matcha toppskikts-syskonet Mi Note 10.

Mi Note 10 Lite eller Mi Note 10? Även om det inte är någon tvekan om att 108 MP-kameran på Mi Note 10 tar aningen bättre bilder har Mi Note 10 Lite nästan lika hög bildkvalitet, åtminstone när belysningen är bra. Men Lite-versionen är betydligt billigare, vilket i vårt tycke gör den till ett bättre val för prismedvetna köpare.

Mi Note 10 Lite har inte särskilt många brister. Men eftersom den interna lagringen inte går att utöka med ett microSD-kort får intresserade köpare noga överväga huruvida man vill ha modellen med 64 GB eller den med 128 GB. Vidare är Xiaomis telefon inte vattentät, den saknar trådlös laddning och känns dessutom ganska halkig på grund av de släta ytorna.

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite - 2022-08-31 08/31/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

Design

86%

Tangentbord

69 / 75 → 92%

Mus

96%

Anslutningar

48 / 70 → 69%

Vikt

88%

Batteri

92%

Skärm

90%

Spelprestanda

28 / 64 → 44%

Programprestanda

68 / 86 → 79%

Temperatur

89%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 84%

Camera

68%

Medel

77%

83%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite – Pris/prestanda-hit (Sammanfattning)

Manuel Masiero, 2020-08-11 (Update: 2020-08-12)

Test: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite – Pris/prestanda-hit (Sammanfattning)

Testgrupp

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme - Funktionalitet över genomsnittet till ett lågt pris

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare