Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite – Pris/prestanda-hit (Sammanfattning)

Underskattad. Eftersom Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite är nästan lika kraftfull och utrustad med nästan samma funktioner som sitt toppskikts-syskon Mi Note 10 är "Lite"-tillägget mer förvirrande än informativt. Det är bara kameramodulen som Xiaomi har ändrat, som nu har en upplösning på 64 MP istället för 108 MP. Men Mi Note 10 Lite är också betydligt billigare - så på så sätt passar det att den heter "Lite".
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Mi Note Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 618
Minne
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Skärm
6.47 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 398 PPI, Kapacitiv, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, FHD+, 3D curved, HDR10, glansig: ja, HDR, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 108.6 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Fingeravtrycksläsare, Vibrationsmotor, IR-sändare, Ljussensor, Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Elektronisk kompass, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, USB OTB, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display, DRM Widevine L1
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (Band 2, 3, 5, 8), UMTS (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41), SAR (Huvud) 1,011 W/kg, SAR (Kropp) 1,385 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.67 x 157.8 x 74.2
Batteri
5260 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix Fyrdubbel kamera: 64 MP huvudkamera (Sony IMX686, f/1.89, 1/1.73", 0.8 µm) + 8 MP ultra-vidvinkelskamera (f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12 µm) + 5 MP djupsensor (f/2.4, 1/1.5", 1.12 µm) + 2 MP makrokamera (f/2.4, 1/1.4", 1.75 µm), Video i upp till [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.48, 1/3.06" 1.0 µm, Video i upp till [email protected]
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på undersidan, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Modulär laddare på 30 Watt, USB-kabel (Typ C till Typ A), Hörlurar, SIM-verktyg, Skyddsfodral, Användarguide, Garantikort, MIUI 11, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
204 g, Strömförsörjning: 85 g
Pris
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83 %
08/2020
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
SD 730G, Adreno 618
204 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.47"2340x1080
82 %
07/2020
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.5"2400x1080
81 %
10/2019
Oppo Reno2
SD 730G, Adreno 618
189 g256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2400x1080
80 %
01/2020
Samsung Galaxy A51
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2400x1080
83 %
12/2019
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080

Storleksjämförelse

162.31 mm 75 mm 8.58 mm 189 g160 mm 74.3 mm 9 mm 189 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.67 mm 204 g158.5 mm 73.6 mm 7.9 mm 172 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Oppo Reno2
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
618 (532min - 671max) MBit/s ∼100% +81%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (334min - 349max) MBit/s ∼55%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
333 (319min - 345max) MBit/s ∼54% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
331 (317min - 341max) MBit/s ∼54% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
298 (185min - 350max) MBit/s ∼48% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=590)
277 MBit/s ∼45% -19%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Oppo Reno2
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
355 (187min - 387max) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
327 (321min - 333max) MBit/s ∼92% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
324 (310min - 330max) MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (189min - 335max) MBit/s ∼84% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=590)
263 MBit/s ∼74% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
255 (234min - 277max) MBit/s ∼72% -21%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (334-349)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø324 (310-330)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Översikt
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Översikt
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Bro
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Bro
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Sväng
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Sväng
Garmin Edge 520: Översikt
Garmin Edge 520: Översikt
Garmin Edge 520: Bro
Garmin Edge 520: Bro
Garmin Edge 520: Sväng
Garmin Edge 520: Sväng

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 2WeitwinkelLowlight
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
55.6 ∆E
48.2 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
56.5 ∆E
58.7 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: 41.52 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 64.74 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
16 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: 7.38 ∆E min: 1.19 - max: 16.03 ∆E
598
cd/m²
596
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
623
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
612
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 626 cd/m² Medel: 608.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.81 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 605 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.84 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.211
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5
Oppo Reno2
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Samsung Galaxy A51
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
-80%
-132%
-105%
-153%
Brightness middle
605
466
-23%
679
12%
589
-3%
625
3%
Brightness
608
457
-25%
683
12%
589
-3%
607
0%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
98
3%
94
-1%
89
-6%
Black Level *
0.61
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.84
2.2
-162%
3.5
-317%
2.22
-164%
4.38
-421%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
1.8
4.6
-156%
6.8
-278%
8.24
-358%
6.83
-279%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.3
2.7
-108%
4.2
-223%
2.6
-100%
4.1
-215%
Gamma
2.211 100%
2.24 98%
2.27 97%
2.111 104%
2.251 98%
CCT
6310 103%
6633 98%
6532 100%
6508 100%
7251 90%
Contrast
764

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 176.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 176.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 176.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17612 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
903 Points ∼42%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
2137 Points ∼100% +137%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
812 Points ∼38% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
920 Points ∼43% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (812 - 920, n=3)
878 Points ∼41% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼76% +81%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points ∼62%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1080 Points ∼61% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1127 Points ∼64% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1080 - 1127, n=3)
1099 Points ∼62% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼100% +61%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼69%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
2434 Points ∼100% +44%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1762 Points ∼72% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1727 Points ∼71% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1646 - 1762, n=4)
1706 Points ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=111)
1941 Points ∼80% +15%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
547 Points ∼85%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
642 Points ∼100% +17%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
547 Points ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
543 Points ∼85% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (543 - 549, n=4)
547 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=111)
552 Points ∼86% +1%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7628 Points ∼80%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
9527 Points ∼100% +25%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
7134 Points ∼75% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5649 Points ∼59% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7558 Points ∼79% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (7134 - 8683, n=5)
7711 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=514)
5925 Points ∼62% -22%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8941 Points ∼68%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
13099 Points ∼100% +47%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
9145 Points ∼70% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6416 Points ∼49% -28%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
9052 Points ∼69% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (8941 - 10200, n=5)
9316 Points ∼71% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=672)
6495 Points ∼50% -27%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2686 Points ∼81%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
3331 Points ∼100% +24%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2621 Points ∼79% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2161 Points ∼65% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2768 Points ∼83% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2621 - 2768, n=5)
2709 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=167)
2655 Points ∼80% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2143 Points ∼47%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4544 Points ∼100% +112%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2155 Points ∼47% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1438 Points ∼32% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2153 Points ∼47% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2143 - 2155, n=5)
2149 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=167)
2962 Points ∼65% +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2244 Points ∼53%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4204 Points ∼100% +87%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points ∼53% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1554 Points ∼37% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2265 Points ∼54% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2244 - 2265, n=5)
2253 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6754, n=167)
2670 Points ∼64% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3058 Points ∼66%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4642 Points ∼100% +52%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3162 Points ∼68% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2311 Points ∼50% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3188 Points ∼69% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3058 - 3309, n=5)
3184 Points ∼69% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=517)
2205 Points ∼48% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2466 Points ∼50%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4906 Points ∼100% +99%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2434 Points ∼50% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1530 Points ∼31% -38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2425 Points ∼49% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2425 - 2492, n=5)
2457 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=517)
2115 Points ∼43% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2577 Points ∼53%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4845 Points ∼100% +88%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2565 Points ∼53% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1654 Points ∼34% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2561 Points ∼53% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2561 - 2615, n=5)
2577 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8269, n=518)
1976 Points ∼41% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3134 Points ∼68%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4637 Points ∼100% +48%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3112 Points ∼67% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2336 Points ∼50% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3193 Points ∼69% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3112 - 3329, n=5)
3185 Points ∼69% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=548)
2116 Points ∼46% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3751 Points ∼59%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6327 Points ∼100% +69%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3647 Points ∼58% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1993 Points ∼31% -47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3646 Points ∼58% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3646 - 3751, n=5)
3688 Points ∼58% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=548)
2835 Points ∼45% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼61%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5853 Points ∼100% +63%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3513 Points ∼60% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2060 Points ∼35% -43%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3535 Points ∼60% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3513 - 3647, n=5)
3562 Points ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=548)
2383 Points ∼41% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3257 Points ∼81%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +24%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3088 Points ∼77% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2217 Points ∼55% -32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3171 Points ∼79% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3088 - 3257, n=5)
3193 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=598)
2088 Points ∼52% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2298 Points ∼48%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4804 Points ∼100% +109%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2243 Points ∼47% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1473 Points ∼31% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2237 Points ∼47% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2237 - 2310, n=5)
2267 Points ∼47% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=598)
1780 Points ∼37% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2459 Points ∼53%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4608 Points ∼100% +87%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼52% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1592 Points ∼35% -35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2394 Points ∼52% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2388 - 2468, n=5)
2423 Points ∼53% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7400, n=599)
1700 Points ∼37% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3294 Points ∼81%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4042 Points ∼100% +23%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3075 Points ∼76% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2225 Points ∼55% -32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3191 Points ∼79% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3075 - 3294, n=5)
3212 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=640)
1953 Points ∼48% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3610 Points ∼59%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6158 Points ∼100% +71%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3504 Points ∼57% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2027 Points ∼33% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3498 Points ∼57% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3485 - 3629, n=5)
3545 Points ∼58% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12611, n=639)
2348 Points ∼38% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼65%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5516 Points ∼100% +53%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3399 Points ∼62% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2068 Points ∼37% -42%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼62% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3399 - 3594, n=5)
3477 Points ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=642)
2019 Points ∼37% -44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
20767 Points ∼50%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
41610 Points ∼100% +100%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
14820 Points ∼36% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20393 Points ∼49% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
22054 Points ∼53% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (14820 - 22054, n=4)
18292 Points ∼44% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=786)
15428 Points ∼37% -26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53194 Points ∼93%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
57067 Points ∼100% +7%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
50829 Points ∼89% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25086 Points ∼44% -53%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
51267 Points ∼90% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (50829 - 53548, n=4)
52210 Points ∼91% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=784)
26650 Points ∼47% -50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39491 Points ∼75%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
52715 Points ∼100% +33%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
33007 Points ∼63% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23866 Points ∼45% -40%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39608 Points ∼75% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (33007 - 39608, n=4)
36696 Points ∼70% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=784)
20808 Points ∼39% -47%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
83 fps ∼74%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
112 fps ∼100% +35%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼76% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
46 fps ∼41% -45%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼75% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (83 - 85, n=4)
84 fps ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=788)
45 fps ∼40% -46%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (59 - 60, n=4)
59.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=797)
31.1 fps ∼52% -48%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼59%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +68%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps ∼61% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼35% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼59% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (41 - 42, n=4)
41.3 fps ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=693)
26.6 fps ∼39% -35%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼71%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
55 fps ∼100% +41%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps ∼65% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼42% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼69% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (36 - 39, n=4)
37.8 fps ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=701)
22.4 fps ∼41% -43%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼64%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +57%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼64% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15 fps ∼32% -50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼64% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (30 - 30, n=4)
30 fps ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=556)
21.4 fps ∼46% -29%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼73%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
40 fps ∼100% +38%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps ∼65% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼35% -52%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼68% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (26 - 29, n=4)
27.5 fps ∼69% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=558)
19.4 fps ∼49% -33%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼65%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +55%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼59% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.5 fps ∼32% -50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼59% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (10 - 11, n=5)
10.4 fps ∼61% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=310)
11.3 fps ∼66% +3%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps ∼56%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
12 fps ∼100% +79%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6.7 fps ∼56% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼29% -48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼83% +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6.6 - 10, n=5)
7.34 fps ∼61% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=308)
8.05 fps ∼67% +20%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼65%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
26 fps ∼100% +53%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼62% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.1 fps ∼35% -46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼62% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (16 - 17, n=5)
16.4 fps ∼63% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=314)
16.8 fps ∼65% -1%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼58%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +72%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼58% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼32% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼58% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (18 - 18, n=5)
18 fps ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=313)
19.4 fps ∼63% +8%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼63%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
27 fps ∼100% +59%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼63% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼37% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼63% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (17 - 17, n=4)
17 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=481)
14.4 fps ∼53% -15%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼74%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
23 fps ∼100% +35%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼65% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.6 fps ∼37% -49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼65% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (15 - 17, n=4)
15.8 fps ∼69% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=485)
12.7 fps ∼55% -25%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
273255 Points ∼74%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
369207 Points ∼100% +35%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
260154 Points ∼70% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
181295 Points ∼49% -34%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
266417 Points ∼72% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (260154 - 273255, n=4)
267266 Points ∼72% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=110)
318009 Points ∼86% +16%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
54.792 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 47.8, n=4)
46.5 Points ∼85% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
46.148 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
46.038 Points ∼84% 0%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
45.819 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=187)
40.5 Points ∼74% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
27.681 Points ∼51% -40%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
96.293 Points ∼100% +17%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
83.953 Points ∼87% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=4)
83.3 Points ∼87% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
82.347 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
79.228 Points ∼82% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
51.257 Points ∼53% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=618)
47.1 Points ∼49% -43%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
49.5 runs/min ∼100% +23%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
43.6 runs/min ∼88% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
43.3 runs/min ∼87% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=4)
42.9 runs/min ∼87% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=170)
42.7 runs/min ∼86% +6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
40.4 runs/min ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
29.1 runs/min ∼59% -28%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
115 Points ∼100% +64%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
77 Points ∼67% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=4)
71 Points ∼62% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
70 Points ∼61%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=254)
69.7 Points ∼61% 0%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
66 Points ∼57% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
57 Points ∼50% -19%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
19727 Points ∼100% +22%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
17345 Points ∼88% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=4)
16888 Points ∼86% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
16241 Points ∼82% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
16197 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
10194 Points ∼52% -37%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=785)
7848 Points ∼40% -52%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=811)
9775 ms * ∼100% -232%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
4375.1 ms * ∼45% -49%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
3054.3 ms * ∼31% -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
2940.5 ms * ∼30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=4)
2929 ms * ∼30% -0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
2769.8 ms * ∼28% +6%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
2254.1 ms * ∼23% +23%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteHuawei P40 Lite 5GOppo Reno2Samsung Galaxy A51Xiaomi Mi Note 10Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
44%
-22%
-12%
-4%
-3%
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.67 (NM Card)
53.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
51.4 (17.1 - 71.9, n=31)
51.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=530)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.35 (NM Card)
74.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.5 (18 - 87.1, n=31)
69.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=530)
Random Write 4KB
125.75
249.66
99%
22
-83%
104.4
-17%
118.9
-5%
69 (8.77 - 165, n=43)
-45%
35.8 (0.14 - 319, n=883)
-72%
Random Read 4KB
134.57
146.07
9%
144.24
7%
110.8
-18%
106.2
-21%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=43)
0%
59.1 (1.59 - 324, n=883)
-56%
Sequential Write 256KB
213.22
188.01
-12%
201.78
-5%
184.9
-13%
243.6
14%
199 (133 - 388, n=43)
-7%
127 (2.99 - 911, n=883)
-40%
Sequential Read 256KB
501.29
905.47
81%
469.31
-6%
496.1
-1%
480.5
-4%
703 (476 - 895, n=43)
40%
341 (12.1 - 1802, n=883)
-32%
010203040Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.19.0: Ø29.6 (10-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.3.4a: Ø29.8 (24-31)
Hög belastning
 37.3 °C40.1 °C39.4 °C 
 37.6 °C39.3 °C39.8 °C 
 37.6 °C38.5 °C39.1 °C 
Max: 40.1 °C
Medel: 38.7 °C
35.1 °C36.8 °C36.6 °C
35.3 °C36 °C35.6 °C
36.6 °C36.9 °C35.1 °C
Max: 36.9 °C
Medel: 36 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  37.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.839.42539.941.63131.935.44038.937.25043.737.96329.829.98025.924.910026.325.912524.927.816021.636.3200194325018.949.131518.154.940016.658.950016.261.463014.963.38001564.2100015.672.6125014.974.5160014.973.3200015.675.7250014.671.7315014.269.5400014.164.2500014.465.8630014.669.9800014.970.31000015.269.21250015.463.61600015.750SPL6666.36470.627.583N18.319.715.825.3152.5median 15.4median 64.2Delta2.11042.946.342.343.934.834.63939.140.842.634.43528.127.125.125.123.627.822.137.120.244.919.650.218.456.418.960.520.163.62065.217.566.316.17515.576.217.874.3167315.971.416.172.316.363.416.564.816.572.116.970.916.663.91764.516.55567.866.429.383.620.818.51.255.5median 17median 64.51.710.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteXiaomi Mi Note 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.1 / 1.8 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.7 / 6.1 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh
Oppo Reno2
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-24%
-7%
-23%
-28%
-2%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.65
19%
0.7
12%
0.9
-13%
0.7
12%
0.673 (0.49 - 0.8, n=4)
16%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=884)
-11%
Idle Average *
1.1
2.25
-105%
1.25
-14%
1.7
-55%
1.8
-64%
1.278 (0.96 - 1.8, n=4)
-16%
1.756 (0.6 - 6.2, n=883)
-60%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
2.29
-27%
1.36
24%
1.8
-0%
2.2
-22%
1.59 (1 - 2.2, n=4)
12%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=884)
-13%
Load Average *
3.7
3.7
-0%
5.38
-45%
5.2
-41%
5.2
-41%
4.35 (3.11 - 5.38, n=4)
-18%
4.1 (0.8 - 10.8, n=878)
-11%
Load Maximum *
6.1
6.46
-6%
6.71
-10%
6.6
-8%
7.5
-23%
6.39 (5.23 - 7.5, n=4)
-5%
6.08 (1.2 - 14.2, n=878)
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
37tim 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18tim 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22tim 50min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 37min
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh
Oppo Reno2
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
-24%
-28%
4%
Reader / Idle
2249
2533
13%
1689
-25%
2134
-5%
H.264
1370
1125
-18%
846
-38%
1423
4%
WiFi v1.3
1095
1047
-4%
616
-44%
698
-36%
1127
3%
Load
337
185
-45%
289
-14%
387
15%

För

+ Högkvalitativ konstruktion
+ Böjd skärm
+ Ljusstark AMOLED-skärm
+ Tar bra bilder i dagsljus
+ Ingen strypning
+ Bra spelprestanda
+ Riktigt lång batteritid
+ Snabb laddning

Emot

- Halkigt glashölje
- Mediokra bilder vid låg ljusnivå
- Ingen microSD-plats
- Saknar IP-certifiering

Omdöme - Funktionalitet över genomsnittet till ett lågt pris

Recension av Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Recensionsex från
Recension av Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Recensionsex från

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

"Utmärkt kamera, små kompromisser", det summerar omdömet vi gav Xiaomi Mi Note 10. Med det som utgångspunkt blir omdömet för Mi Note 10 Lite istället: Fortfarande en bra kamera och inga andra kompromisser jämfört med Mi Note 10.

Lite-versionen har allt som gjorde toppskikts-motsvarigheten bra: Utmärkt konstruktionskvalitet, en ljusstark AMOLED-skärm, extremt lång batteritid, snabb laddning, en snabb åttakärnig SoC samt sist men inte minst, riktigt bra prestanda i förhållande till priset.

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite ligger över genomsnittet för en mittenskiktstelefon och det är bara kameran som inte riktigt kan matcha toppskikts-syskonet Mi Note 10.

Mi Note 10 Lite eller Mi Note 10? Även om det inte är någon tvekan om att 108 MP-kameran på Mi Note 10 tar aningen bättre bilder har Mi Note 10 Lite nästan lika hög bildkvalitet, åtminstone när belysningen är bra. Men Lite-versionen är betydligt billigare, vilket i vårt tycke gör den till ett bättre val för prismedvetna köpare. 

Mi Note 10 Lite har inte särskilt många brister. Men eftersom den interna lagringen inte går att utöka med ett microSD-kort får intresserade köpare noga överväga huruvida man vill ha modellen med 64 GB eller den med 128 GB. Vidare är Xiaomis telefon inte vattentät, den saknar trådlös laddning och känns dessutom ganska halkig på grund av de släta ytorna.

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite - 08/06/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Design
86%
Tangentbord
69 / 75 → 92%
Mus
96%
Anslutningar
48 / 70 → 69%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
28 / 64 → 44%
Programprestanda
68 / 86 → 79%
Temperatur
89%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
68%
Medel
77%
83%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite – Pris/prestanda-hit (Sammanfattning)
Manuel Masiero, 2020-08-11 (Update: 2020-08-12)