Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G : 5G och 120 Hz-skärm till budgetpris (Sammanfattning)

En bunt mirakel. Även om det finns många 5G-telefoner är ingen lika billig som Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite. Trots detta har man inte tagit bort några viktiga funtkioner och denna mittenskiktare på 6.67 tum har både en 120 Hz-skärm och ett batteri som håller riktigt länge.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Mi 10 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 570 (Cortex-A77/A55)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Minne
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Skärm
6.67 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 395 PPI, Kapacitiv, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, FHD+, MEMC, glansig: ja, HDR, 120 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108.6 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, USB Typ-C, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 512 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Ultraljudsbaserad närhetssensor, Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Elektronisk kompass, Linjär Z-axelsvibrationsmotor, IR-sändare, 2x2 MIMO, Quick Charge 4.0, Power Delivery 3.0, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, IR-sändare, FM-radio
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/32/38/40/41), 5G (Sub6G n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n41/n77/n78), Huvud SAR 0,595 W/kg, Kropp SAR 0,988 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9 x 165.38 x 76.8
Batteri
4820 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix Fyrdubbel kamera: 64MP (Sony IMX682, f/1.89, 1/1.7", 0.8 µm, autofokus) + 8MP ultra-vidvinkel (f/2.2, 1/4", 1.12 µm, FOV 120˚) + 2MP makro-objektiv (f/2.4. 1/5", 1.75 µm) + 2MP djupsensor (f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75 µm), 4k video @30fps, 1080p video @30/60
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.45, 1/3.06", 1.0 µm, 1080p video @30fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Dubbla högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Nätadapter på 33W, USB Typ-C kabel, enkelt skyddsfodral, SIM-verktyg, Användarguide, Garantikort, MIUI 12, fanless
Vikt
215 g, Strömförsörjning: 86 g
Pris
350 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82 %
12/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619		215 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
84 %
11/2020
Google Pixel 4a 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620		168 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.20"2340x1080
85 %
06/2020
LG Velvet
SD 765G, Adreno 620		180 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.80"2460x1080
80 %
08/2020
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
SD 765, Adreno 620		207 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
83 %
08/2020
OnePlus Nord
SD 765G, Adreno 620		184 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.44"2440x1080
82 %
05/2020
Oppo Find X2 Lite
SD 765G, Adreno 620		180 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080
84 %
08/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620		192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080

Storleksjämförelse

❌
168 mm 74 mm 9 mm 207 g167.08 mm 74 mm 7.85 mm 180 g165.38 mm 76.8 mm 9 mm 215 g163.7 mm 74.8 mm 7.9 mm 192 g160.3 mm 74.3 mm 7.96 mm 180 g158.3 mm 73.3 mm 8.2 mm 184 g153.9 mm 74 mm 8.2 mm 168 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
683 (656min - 691max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
671 (652min - 683max) MBit/s ∼98% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
667 (339min - 692max) MBit/s ∼98%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
666 (646min - 677max) MBit/s ∼98% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (563min - 668max) MBit/s ∼95% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (545min - 662max) MBit/s ∼92% -6%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
603 (517min - 635max) MBit/s ∼88% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=641)
290 MBit/s ∼42% -57%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 (618min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100% +21%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
646 (590min - 656max) MBit/s ∼97% +17%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
620 (300min - 635max) MBit/s ∼93% +13%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
618 (310min - 644max) MBit/s ∼93% +12%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
563 (275min - 666max) MBit/s ∼84% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼82%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
300 (211min - 318max) MBit/s ∼45% -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=641)
276 MBit/s ∼41% -50%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø655 (339-692)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø551 (465-583)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite: Fullständig rutt
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite: Fullständig rutt
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite: Sjö
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite: Sjö
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite: Vägskäl
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite: Vägskäl
Garmin Edge 500: Fullständig rutt
Garmin Edge 500: Fullständig rutt
Garmin Edge 500: Sjö
Garmin Edge 500: Sjö
Garmin Edge 500: Vägskäl
Garmin Edge 500: Vägskäl

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 2Weitwinkel5-facher ZoomLowlight-Umgebung
click to load images
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
66.3 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
93 ∆E
70.7 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G: 46.97 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 92.97 ∆E
ColorChecker
2.7 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G: 4.31 ∆E min: 1.1 - max: 9.82 ∆E
584
cd/m²		595
cd/m²		543
cd/m²
577
cd/m²		606
cd/m²		541
cd/m²
544
cd/m²		611
cd/m²		562
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 611 cd/m² Medel: 573.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.46 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 606 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1377:1 (Svärta: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67		Google Pixel 4a 5G
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.20		LG Velvet
P-OLED, 2460x1080, 6.80		Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70		OnePlus Nord
AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44		Oppo Find X2 Lite
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.40		Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
Screen
37%
4%
11%
10%
-33%
27%
Brightness middle
606
669
10%
586
-3%
461
-24%
529
-13%
638
5%
584
-4%
Brightness
574
671
17%
587
2%
458
-20%
531
-7%
633
10%
583
2%
Brightness Distribution
89
94
6%
97
9%
93
4%
94
6%
95
7%
97
9%
Black Level *
0.44
0.52
-18%
Contrast
1377
887
-36%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
1
58%
2.8
-17%
1.01
58%
2.53
-5%
5.6
-133%
1.17
51%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.3
1.8
66%
6.3
-19%
2.1
60%
4.52
15%
8.9
-68%
2.95
44%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.5
1.5
67%
2.3
49%
1.5
67%
1.7
62%
5.3
-18%
1.7
62%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.25 98%
2.01 109%
2.25 98%
2.249 98%
2.25 98%
2.231 99%
CCT
6224 104%
6685 97%
6827 95%
6701 97%
6462 101%
7118 91%
6341 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 42 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 42 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27.6 ms rise
↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).
Geekbench 5.3 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | AImark | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1227 Points ∼64%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1242 Points ∼65% +1%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1095 Points ∼57% -11%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1242 Points ∼65% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1293 Points ∼67% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (1227 - 1252, n=2)
1240 Points ∼65% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7400, n=66)
1918 Points ∼100% +56%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1081 Points ∼64%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
925 Points ∼55% -14%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1187 Points ∼71% +10%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1022 Points ∼61% -5%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1169 Points ∼70% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1183 Points ∼71% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (1081 - 1120, n=2)
1101 Points ∼66% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6252, n=69)
1678 Points ∼100% +55%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2009 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1631 Points ∼81% -19%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1797 Points ∼89% -11%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1954 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1966 Points ∼98% -2%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1815 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1908 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (1979 - 2009, n=2)
1994 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=170)
1937 Points ∼96% -4%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
658 Points ∼98%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
601 Points ∼89% -9%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
554 Points ∼82% -16%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
596 Points ∼89% -9%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
611 Points ∼91% -7%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
572 Points ∼85% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
673 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (658 - 658, n=2)
658 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (63 - 1604, n=170)
560 Points ∼83% -15%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7547 Points ∼80%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8319 Points ∼88% +10%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7808 Points ∼83% +3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
8756 Points ∼93% +16%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9427 Points ∼100% +25%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
7754 Points ∼82% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7786 Points ∼83% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (7547 - 8063, n=2)
7805 Points ∼83% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=567)
6083 Points ∼65% -19%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8853 Points ∼81%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
10122 Points ∼93% +14%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
9154 Points ∼84% +3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
9914 Points ∼91% +12%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
10876 Points ∼100% +23%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9756 Points ∼90% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8730 Points ∼80% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
 
8853 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=716)
6702 Points ∼62% -24%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1094 Points ∼33%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1026 Points ∼31% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
 
1094 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=32)
3288 Points ∼100% +201%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1097 Points ∼38%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1023 Points ∼36% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
 
1097 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=32)
2853 Points ∼100% +160%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2864 Points ∼96%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2978 Points ∼100% +4%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2145 Points ∼72% -25%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2802 Points ∼94% -2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2867 Points ∼96% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2757 Points ∼93% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2893 Points ∼97% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (2858 - 2864, n=2)
2861 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=219)
2636 Points ∼89% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2510 Points ∼78%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2145 Points ∼67% -15%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3193 Points ∼100% +27%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2844 Points ∼89% +13%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3185 Points ∼100% +27%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3177 Points ∼99% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3198 Points ∼100% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (2510 - 2548, n=2)
2529 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=219)
3011 Points ∼94% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2581 Points ∼82%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2287 Points ∼73% -11%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2877 Points ∼92% +11%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2814 Points ∼90% +9%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3108 Points ∼99% +20%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3072 Points ∼98% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3130 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (2581 - 2611, n=2)
2596 Points ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=219)
2656 Points ∼85% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3649 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3539 Points ∼97% -3%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1898 Points ∼52% -48%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3457 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3544 Points ∼97% -3%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3325 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3495 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (3636 - 3649, n=2)
3643 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=576)
2290 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2823 Points ∼79%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2814 Points ∼78% 0%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3547 Points ∼99% +26%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3165 Points ∼88% +12%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3556 Points ∼99% +26%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3568 Points ∼99% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3589 Points ∼100% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (2823 - 2845, n=2)
2834 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=576)
2288 Points ∼64% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2973 Points ∼82%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2948 Points ∼82% -1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2934 Points ∼81% -1%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3236 Points ∼90% +9%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3553 Points ∼99% +20%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3524 Points ∼98% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3605 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (2973 - 2990, n=2)
2982 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=577)
2113 Points ∼59% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3651 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3563 Points ∼98% -2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1790 Points ∼49% -51%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3512 Points ∼96% -4%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3555 Points ∼97% -3%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3114 Points ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3492 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (3597 - 3651, n=2)
3624 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=607)
2208 Points ∼60% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4263 Points ∼78%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4053 Points ∼75% -5%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5437 Points ∼100% +28%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4865 Points ∼89% +14%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5357 Points ∼99% +26%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5356 Points ∼99% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5335 Points ∼98% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (4263 - 4298, n=2)
4281 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=607)
3140 Points ∼58% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4110 Points ∼84%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3933 Points ∼80% -4%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3678 Points ∼75% -11%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4484 Points ∼92% +9%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4815 Points ∼98% +17%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4663 Points ∼95% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4893 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (4110 - 4120, n=2)
4115 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=607)
2578 Points ∼53% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3542 Points ∼99%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3556 Points ∼100% 0%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3312 Points ∼93% -6%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3445 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3503 Points ∼98% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼91% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3425 Points ∼96% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (3542 - 3588, n=2)
3565 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=656)
2165 Points ∼61% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2617 Points ∼79%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2048 Points ∼62% -22%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3289 Points ∼99% +26%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2963 Points ∼89% +13%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3284 Points ∼99% +25%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3302 Points ∼99% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3321 Points ∼100% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (2617 - 2667, n=2)
2642 Points ∼80% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=656)
1906 Points ∼57% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2778 Points ∼83%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2261 Points ∼68% -19%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3278 Points ∼98% +18%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3015 Points ∼90% +9%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3330 Points ∼100% +20%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼97% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3346 Points ∼100% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (2778 - 2828, n=2)
2803 Points ∼84% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=657)
1809 Points ∼54% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3523 Points ∼99%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3501 Points ∼98% -1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1689 Points ∼47% -52%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3498 Points ∼98% -1%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3476 Points ∼98% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3074 Points ∼86% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3452 Points ∼97% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (3523 - 3607, n=2)
3565 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5301, n=698)
2038 Points ∼57% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4072 Points ∼70%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2862 Points ∼49% -30%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5005 Points ∼86% +23%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4654 Points ∼80% +14%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5171 Points ∼89% +27%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5136 Points ∼88% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5832 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (4072 - 4189, n=2)
4131 Points ∼71% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=697)
2545 Points ∼44% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2825 Points ∼60%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2983 Points ∼64% +6%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3576 Points ∼76% +27%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4401 Points ∼94% +56%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4665 Points ∼99% +65%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4478 Points ∼95% +59%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4693 Points ∼100% +66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (2825 - 4044, n=2)
3435 Points ∼73% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=700)
2173 Points ∼46% -23%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20076 Points ∼71%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
28116 Points ∼100% +40%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18769 Points ∼67% -7%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
20156 Points ∼72% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21016 Points ∼75% +5%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19521 Points ∼69% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20429 Points ∼73% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (19708 - 20076, n=2)
19892 Points ∼71% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=842)
15957 Points ∼57% -21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
55911 Points ∼80%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
56690 Points ∼82% +1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
68764 Points ∼99% +23%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
62756 Points ∼90% +12%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69285 Points ∼100% +24%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68456 Points ∼98% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
69506 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (55911 - 56286, n=2)
56099 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=840)
29153 Points ∼42% -48%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
40032 Points ∼87%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
46246 Points ∼100% +16%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
43325 Points ∼94% +8%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
42735 Points ∼92% +7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
45872 Points ∼99% +15%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
43965 Points ∼95% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
45304 Points ∼98% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (39850 - 40032, n=2)
39941 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=840)
22274 Points ∼48% -44%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
90 fps ∼93%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼51% -46%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
96 fps ∼99% +7%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
86 fps ∼89% -4%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
97 fps ∼100% +8%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
95 fps ∼98% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
95 fps ∼98% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (90 - 91, n=2)
90.5 fps ∼93% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=834)
48.7 fps ∼50% -46%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
50 fps ∼67%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
43 fps ∼57% -14%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼80% +20%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +50%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼80% +20%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
60 fps ∼80% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼80% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (50 - 60, n=2)
55 fps ∼73% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 142, n=843)
32.5 fps ∼43% -35%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
45 fps ∼80%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
31 fps ∼55% -31%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼98% +22%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
50 fps ∼89% +11%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
55 fps ∼98% +22%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
56 fps ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼88% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (45 - 46, n=2)
45.5 fps ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=739)
28.9 fps ∼52% -36%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
40 fps ∼73%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
30 fps ∼55% -25%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
47 fps ∼85% +18%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
44 fps ∼80% +10%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼91% +25%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
50 fps ∼91% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (40 - 59, n=2)
49.5 fps ∼90% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 117, n=747)
23.8 fps ∼43% -40%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps ∼87%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
22 fps ∼58% -33%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
37 fps ∼97% +12%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
33 fps ∼87% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼100% +15%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
38 fps ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (33 - 33, n=2)
33 fps ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=602)
23.1 fps ∼61% -30%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
29 fps ∼68%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼49% -28%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
32 fps ∼75% +10%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
29 fps ∼68% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼80% +17%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
34 fps ∼80% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps ∼78% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (29 - 56, n=2)
42.5 fps ∼100% +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=604)
20.6 fps ∼48% -29%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps ∼69%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.9 fps ∼56% -19%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
12 fps ∼75% +9%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
11 fps ∼69% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼81% +18%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼81% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼81% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (11 - 21, n=2)
16 fps ∼100% +45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=366)
11.8 fps ∼74% +7%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.4 fps ∼86%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5.5 fps ∼64% -26%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼99% +15%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
7.5 fps ∼87% +1%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼99% +15%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.6 fps ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼99% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (7.4 - 7.4, n=2)
7.4 fps ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=364)
8.23 fps ∼96% +11%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
17 fps ∼68%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
14 fps ∼56% -18%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20 fps ∼80% +18%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
18 fps ∼72% +6%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼84% +24%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼84% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼84% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (17 - 33, n=2)
25 fps ∼100% +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=370)
17.6 fps ∼70% +4%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps ∼83%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼54% -35%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
23 fps ∼96% +15%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
21 fps ∼88% +5%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼100% +20%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
24 fps ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (20 - 20, n=2)
20 fps ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=370)
20.1 fps ∼84% +1%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps ∼90%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
12 fps ∼57% -37%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +11%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
19 fps ∼90% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼100% +11%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (19 - 19, n=2)
19 fps ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=527)
15.4 fps ∼73% -19%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼65%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
11 fps ∼45% -31%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼73% +13%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
16 fps ∼65% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼78% +19%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
18 fps ∼73% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼73% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (16 - 33, n=2)
24.5 fps ∼100% +53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=531)
13.6 fps ∼56% -15%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
331554 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
287407 Points ∼87% -13%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
308878 Points ∼93% -7%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
279244 Points ∼84% -16%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
332074 Points ∼100% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
323940 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
318669 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (299167 - 331554, n=2)
315361 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 624727, n=152)
325323 Points ∼98% -2%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4989 Points ∼14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (4989 - 4993, n=2)
4991 Points ∼14% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4490 - 107945, n=35)
35602 Points ∼100% +614%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1422 Points ∼97%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1436 Points ∼98% +1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1226 Points ∼84% -14%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1456 Points ∼100% +2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1441 Points ∼99% +1%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1196 Points ∼82% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1462 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (1422 - 1468, n=2)
1445 Points ∼99% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 2169, n=764)
843 Points ∼58% -41%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3947 Points ∼76%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2525 Points ∼49% -36%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5153 Points ∼99% +31%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4697 Points ∼90% +19%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5203 Points ∼100% +32%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5172 Points ∼99% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5201 Points ∼100% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (3947 - 4017, n=2)
3982 Points ∼77% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=764)
2615 Points ∼50% -34%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4687 Points ∼82%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5046 Points ∼89% +8%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4556 Points ∼80% -3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4775 Points ∼84% +2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5296 Points ∼93% +13%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5214 Points ∼92% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5683 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (4543 - 4687, n=2)
4615 Points ∼81% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=764)
1976 Points ∼35% -58%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7033 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5997 Points ∼85% -15%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6430 Points ∼91% -9%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
6745 Points ∼96% -4%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6801 Points ∼97% -3%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6856 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6069 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (7033 - 7052, n=2)
7043 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=764)
3587 Points ∼51% -49%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3688 Points ∼90%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3237 Points ∼79% -12%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3674 Points ∼90% 0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3845 Points ∼94% +4%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4054 Points ∼99% +10%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3856 Points ∼94% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4094 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
  (3688 - 3708, n=2)
3698 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6402, n=764)
1844 Points ∼45% -50%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
58.665 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (52.7 - 54.7, n=2)
53.7 Points ∼92% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
52.656 Points ∼90%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
50.998 Points ∼87% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.232 Points ∼86% -5%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
49.09 Points ∼84% -7%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
48.568 Points ∼83% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226)
42.9 Points ∼73% -19%
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83)
39.522 Points ∼67% -25%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
94.481 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (93 - 94.5, n=2)
93.8 Points ∼99% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
93.643 Points ∼99% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
93.023 Points ∼98%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
92.693 Points ∼98% 0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
88.457 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659)
50.4 Points ∼53% -46%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)
53.6 runs/min ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.7 runs/min ∼95% +10%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
49.8 runs/min ∼93% +8%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
48.5 runs/min ∼90% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (46.2 - 47.6, n=2)
46.9 runs/min ∼88% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
46.2 runs/min ∼86%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
45.2 runs/min ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205)
45.2 runs/min ∼84% -2%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
101 Points ∼100% +33%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
78 Points ∼77% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
76 Points ∼75% 0%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
76 Points ∼75% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
76 Points ∼75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (75 - 76, n=2)
75.5 Points ∼75% -1%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
75 Points ∼74% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83)
72 Points ∼71% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297)
71.1 Points ∼70% -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
19143 Points ∼100% +7%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
19009 Points ∼99% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
18556 Points ∼97% +4%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
18546 Points ∼97% +4%
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83)
17890 Points ∼93% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (17809 - 17899, n=2)
17854 Points ∼93% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
17809 Points ∼93%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
16302 Points ∼85% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829)
8416 Points ∼44% -53%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855)
9488 ms * ∼100% -262%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
2834.8 ms * ∼30% -8%
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83)
2778 ms * ∼29% -6%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
2764.2 ms * ∼29% -5%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
2665.8 ms * ∼28% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (2623 - 2665, n=2)
2644 ms * ∼28% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
2622.8 ms * ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
2602.2 ms * ∼27% +1%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
2560.6 ms * ∼27% +2%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5GGoogle Pixel 4a 5GLG VelvetMotorola Moto G 5G PlusOnePlus NordOppo Find X2 LiteXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-10%
-10%
-19%
-15%
-4%
-5%
-22%
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
60.2 (8.4 - 72.4, n=42)
-9%
51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564)
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
87.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
87.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
76.4 (13.4 - 88.3, n=42)
-12%
69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
162.33
186.74
15%
135.87
-16%
119.3
-27%
104.5
-36%
146.1
-10%
138.47
-15%
115 (18.2 - 290, n=74)
-29%
40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935)
-75%
Random Read 4KB
176.59
168.63
-5%
154.28
-13%
138.14
-22%
126.7
-28%
169.44
-4%
156.45
-11%
144 (92.6 - 239, n=74)
-18%
63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935)
-64%
Sequential Write 256KB
463.5
228.73
-51%
409.21
-12%
180.21
-61%
473.1
2%
475.23
3%
476.87
3%
250 (182 - 511, n=74)
-46%
139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935)
-70%
Sequential Read 256KB
938.14
945.02
1%
924.54
-1%
885.34
-6%
955.5
2%
910.45
-3%
979.54
4%
779 (427 - 999, n=74)
-17%
363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935)
-61%
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
; Dead Trigger 2; 1.6.10: Ø119 (50-121)
; Armajet; 1.56.4: Ø91.6 (73-115)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.1.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.5 % ∼100%
Hög belastning
 32.9 °C33.4 °C33.5 °C 
 33 °C32.5 °C33.8 °C 
 31.4 °C32 °C33.4 °C 
Max: 33.8 °C
Medel: 32.9 °C
30.8 °C32.7 °C33.2 °C
30.1 °C32.1 °C32.1 °C
30.3 °C31.3 °C31.7 °C
Max: 33.2 °C
Medel: 31.6 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  27.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203839.62528.936.93123.834.24025.339.3503940.86323.437.58019.337.310016.139.412510.543.216015.348.12001549.82509.654.431512.457.940010.164.150011.468.56301172.280014.573.8100010.975.9125013.577160010.878200011.480.325001280.9315012.58340001385.4500013.176.9630013.671.8800013.470.71000013.571.71250013.961.91600014.761.1SPL24.891.3N0.683.5median 13median 71.7Delta1.69.836.845.839.944.331.935.538.936.643.740.929.830.325.926.526.333.324.938.521.642.21942.718.94618.15416.66116.265.814.969.71568.715.671.914.972.614.970.115.673.414.671.314.268.114.16514.46114.665.614.968.615.268.415.457.115.756.666.36470.627.581.519.715.825.3150.4median 15.4median 65.62.18.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5GXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.24 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.5 / 2.1 / 2.13 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.39 / 7.4 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
4820 mAh		Google Pixel 4a 5G
3885 mAh		LG Velvet
4300 mAh		Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
5000 mAh		OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh		Oppo Find X2 Lite
4025 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
29%
17%
-57%
-40%
-5%
-44%
-30%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
0.5
0.7
-40%
0.66
-32%
1.5
-200%
1.8
-260%
0.75
-50%
1.5
-200%
1.05 (0.5 - 1.6, n=2)
-110%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926)
-78%
Idle Average *
2.1
0.96
54%
1.58
25%
2.1
-0%
2.1
-0%
2.55
-21%
2.2
-5%
2.05 (2 - 2.1, n=2)
2%
1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925)
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.13
0.98
54%
1.6
25%
2.9
-36%
2.3
-8%
2.58
-21%
2.9
-36%
2.37 (2.13 - 2.6, n=2)
-11%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926)
4%
Load Average *
5.39
2.95
45%
3.3
39%
6.7
-24%
3.4
37%
3.21
40%
4.4
18%
6.25 (5.39 - 7.1, n=2)
-16%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920)
24%
Load Maximum *
7.4
5.2
30%
5.46
26%
9.2
-24%
5.2
30%
5.29
29%
7.2
3%
8.45 (7.4 - 9.5, n=2)
-14%
6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920)
17%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
47tim 50min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18tim 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20tim 34min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 10min
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
4820 mAh		Google Pixel 4a 5G
3885 mAh		LG Velvet
4300 mAh		Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
5000 mAh		OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh		Oppo Find X2 Lite
4025 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
Battery Runtime
0%
-32%
-29%
-15%
-34%
8%
Reader / Idle
2870
2459
-14%
1549
-46%
2003
-30%
1683
-41%
H.264
1234
1337
8%
581
-53%
1064
-14%
1403
14%
WiFi v1.3
1096
768
-30%
741
-32%
914
-17%
869
-21%
728
-34%
884
-19%
Load
250
341
36%
252
1%
261
4%
448
79%

För

+ 120 Hz-skärm
+ Hantverk av hög kvalitet
+ 5G och NFC
+ Skaplig 64 MP-kamera för dagsljus
+ Exakt GPS
+ Snabb mittenskikts-SoC
+ Stryps ej vid belastning
+ Riktigt lång batteritid
+ Snabb laddning

Emot

- Ingen IP-certifiering
- Aningen långsammare WLAN-hastigheter för WiFi 6
- Appar går ej att flytta till microSD-kortet
- Endast hybrid dual-SIM
- Medioker ultravidvinkels-kamera
- Tunt stereoljud

Omdöme - Mycket smartphone till ett lågt pris

Recension av Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite. Recensionsex från nbb.com (notebooksbilliger.de)
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite. Recensionsex från nbb.com (notebooksbilliger.de)

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite är en bra mittenskiktstelefon. För det officiella utgångspriset på 2.800 kronor, som förstås redan har gått ner online, är 64 GB-versionen den billigaste 5G-telefonen som finns på marknaden. Samtidigt får denna 6.67-tumstelefon också poäng för sin 120 Hz-skärm, och det lär bli svårt att hitta en sådan kombination till ett lägre pris.     

5G och 120 Hz-skärm – Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite har båda till ett pris så lågt att den i princip inte har några konkurrenter.

Det går att tänka att man på grund av det låga priset inte får mycket mer. Men faktum är att Xiaomi erbjuder ett riktigt välavrundat paket, för allt ifrån känslan till hantverket känns rätt, vilket också gäller batteritiden och WLAN-hastigheten. Dessutom gör en Snapdragon 750G att Mi 10T Lite har en hel del datorkraft. Kameran på 64 MP förtjänar också en del beröm, för den tar skapliga bilder i dagsljus.

Men någonstans har man behövt skära ner. Kameran på Mi 10T Lite kommer inte i närheten av den bildkvalitet dyrare telefoner har. Xiaomis telefon har heller ingen IP-certifiering, men det är i princip alla nackdelarna. En OLED-skärm hade förstås varit att föredra, men med tanke på priset och att resten av utrustningen är bra kan vi inte riktigt vänta oss det också.

Men OLED och billig står inte nödvändigtvis mot varandra: klarar man sig utan en 120 Hz-skärm är Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G ett bra mittenskiktsalternativ till Mi 10T Lite. Om det måste vara OLED, 5G samt bilduppdatering som är snabbare än 60 Hz är OnePlus Nord ett bra exempel, och den kostar för tillfället 4.000 kronor.

Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G - 12/16/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Design
83%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
91%
Anslutningar
55 / 70 → 78%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
32 / 64 → 49%
Programprestanda
72 / 86 → 83%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
63%
Medel
77%
82%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G : 5G och 120 Hz-skärm till budgetpris (Sammanfattning)
Manuel Masiero, 2020-12-23 (Update: 2020-12-23)