Test: Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G : 5G och 120 Hz-skärm till budgetpris (Sammanfattning)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.45, 1/3.06", 1.0 µm, 1080p video @30fps
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82 % | 12/2020 | Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619 | 215 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
84 % | 11/2020 | Google Pixel 4a 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 168 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.20" | 2340x1080 | |
85 % | 06/2020 | LG Velvet SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 180 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.80" | 2460x1080 | |
80 % | 08/2020 | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus SD 765, Adreno 620 | 207 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2520x1080 | |
83 % | 08/2020 | OnePlus Nord SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 184 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.44" | 2440x1080 | |
82 % | 05/2020 | Oppo Find X2 Lite SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 180 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
84 % | 08/2020 | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 192 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.57" | 2340x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
LG Velvet | |
Oppo Find X2 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=641) | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
Oppo Find X2 Lite | |
LG Velvet | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1599, n=641) |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 2Weitwinkel5-facher ZoomLowlight-Umgebung

|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 606 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1377:1 (Svärta: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67 | Google Pixel 4a 5G OLED, 2340x1080, 6.20 | LG Velvet P-OLED, 2460x1080, 6.80 | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70 | OnePlus Nord AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44 | Oppo Find X2 Lite OLED, 2400x1080, 6.40 | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 37% | 4% | 11% | 10% | -33% | 27% | |
Brightness middle | 606 | 669 10% | 586 -3% | 461 -24% | 529 -13% | 638 5% | 584 -4% |
Brightness | 574 | 671 17% | 587 2% | 458 -20% | 531 -7% | 633 10% | 583 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 94 6% | 97 9% | 93 4% | 94 6% | 95 7% | 97 9% |
Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.52 -18% | |||||
Contrast | 1377 | 887 -36% | |||||
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 2.4 | 1 58% | 2.8 -17% | 1.01 58% | 2.53 -5% | 5.6 -133% | 1.17 51% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 5.3 | 1.8 66% | 6.3 -19% | 2.1 60% | 4.52 15% | 8.9 -68% | 2.95 44% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 4.5 | 1.5 67% | 2.3 49% | 1.5 67% | 1.7 62% | 5.3 -18% | 1.7 62% |
Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.01 109% | 2.25 98% | 2.249 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.231 99% |
CCT | 6224 104% | 6685 97% | 6827 95% | 6701 97% | 6462 101% | 7118 91% | 6341 103% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2358 Hz | ≤ 42 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 42 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.6 ms rise | |
↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
LG Velvet | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Oppo Find X2 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (7547 - 8063, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=567) | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
LG Velvet | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Oppo Find X2 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G | |
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=716) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
LG Velvet | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Oppo Find X2 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (90 - 91, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=834) | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
LG Velvet | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Oppo Find X2 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (50 - 60, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 142, n=843) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
LG Velvet | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Oppo Find X2 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (45 - 46, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 180, n=739) | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
LG Velvet | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Oppo Find X2 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (40 - 59, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 117, n=747) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
LG Velvet | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Oppo Find X2 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (33 - 33, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=602) | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
LG Velvet | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Oppo Find X2 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (29 - 56, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=604) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
LG Velvet | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Oppo Find X2 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (299167 - 331554, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 624727, n=152) |
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (4989 - 4993, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4490 - 107945, n=35) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (52.7 - 54.7, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
LG Velvet (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83) | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226) | |
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (93 - 94.5, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83) | |
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
LG Velvet (Chrome 83) | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (46.2 - 47.6, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
LG Velvet (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (75 - 76, n=2) | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
LG Velvet (Chrome 83) | |
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (17809 - 17899, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83) | |
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855) | |
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83) | |
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83) | |
LG Velvet (Chrome 83) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (2623 - 2665, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G | Google Pixel 4a 5G | LG Velvet | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | OnePlus Nord | Oppo Find X2 Lite | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -10% | -10% | -19% | -15% | -4% | -5% | -22% | -52% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 60.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -8% | 65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0% | 60.2 (8.4 - 72.4, n=42) -9% | 51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564) -22% | ||||
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 87.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 77.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -11% | 87.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0% | 76.4 (13.4 - 88.3, n=42) -12% | 69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564) -20% | ||||
Random Write 4KB | 162.33 | 186.74 15% | 135.87 -16% | 119.3 -27% | 104.5 -36% | 146.1 -10% | 138.47 -15% | 115 (18.2 - 290, n=74) -29% | 40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935) -75% |
Random Read 4KB | 176.59 | 168.63 -5% | 154.28 -13% | 138.14 -22% | 126.7 -28% | 169.44 -4% | 156.45 -11% | 144 (92.6 - 239, n=74) -18% | 63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935) -64% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 463.5 | 228.73 -51% | 409.21 -12% | 180.21 -61% | 473.1 2% | 475.23 3% | 476.87 3% | 250 (182 - 511, n=74) -46% | 139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935) -70% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 938.14 | 945.02 1% | 924.54 -1% | 885.34 -6% | 955.5 2% | 910.45 -3% | 979.54 4% | 779 (427 - 999, n=74) -17% | 363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935) -61% |
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Av/Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Låg belastning | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hög belastning |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Förklaring:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G 4820 mAh | Google Pixel 4a 5G 3885 mAh | LG Velvet 4300 mAh | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus 5000 mAh | OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh | Oppo Find X2 Lite 4025 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 29% | 17% | -57% | -40% | -5% | -44% | -30% | -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.5 | 0.7 -40% | 0.66 -32% | 1.5 -200% | 1.8 -260% | 0.75 -50% | 1.5 -200% | 1.05 (0.5 - 1.6, n=2) -110% | 0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926) -78% |
Idle Average * | 2.1 | 0.96 54% | 1.58 25% | 2.1 -0% | 2.1 -0% | 2.55 -21% | 2.2 -5% | 2.05 (2 - 2.1, n=2) 2% | 1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925) 16% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.13 | 0.98 54% | 1.6 25% | 2.9 -36% | 2.3 -8% | 2.58 -21% | 2.9 -36% | 2.37 (2.13 - 2.6, n=2) -11% | 2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926) 4% |
Load Average * | 5.39 | 2.95 45% | 3.3 39% | 6.7 -24% | 3.4 37% | 3.21 40% | 4.4 18% | 6.25 (5.39 - 7.1, n=2) -16% | 4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920) 24% |
Load Maximum * | 7.4 | 5.2 30% | 5.46 26% | 9.2 -24% | 5.2 30% | 5.29 29% | 7.2 3% | 8.45 (7.4 - 9.5, n=2) -14% | 6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920) 17% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G 4820 mAh | Google Pixel 4a 5G 3885 mAh | LG Velvet 4300 mAh | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus 5000 mAh | OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh | Oppo Find X2 Lite 4025 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 0% | -32% | -29% | -15% | -34% | 8% | |
Reader / Idle | 2870 | 2459 -14% | 1549 -46% | 2003 -30% | 1683 -41% | ||
H.264 | 1234 | 1337 8% | 581 -53% | 1064 -14% | 1403 14% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 1096 | 768 -30% | 741 -32% | 914 -17% | 869 -21% | 728 -34% | 884 -19% |
Load | 250 | 341 36% | 252 1% | 261 4% | 448 79% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Mycket smartphone till ett lågt pris
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite är en bra mittenskiktstelefon. För det officiella utgångspriset på 2.800 kronor, som förstås redan har gått ner online, är 64 GB-versionen den billigaste 5G-telefonen som finns på marknaden. Samtidigt får denna 6.67-tumstelefon också poäng för sin 120 Hz-skärm, och det lär bli svårt att hitta en sådan kombination till ett lägre pris.
5G och 120 Hz-skärm – Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite har båda till ett pris så lågt att den i princip inte har några konkurrenter.
Det går att tänka att man på grund av det låga priset inte får mycket mer. Men faktum är att Xiaomi erbjuder ett riktigt välavrundat paket, för allt ifrån känslan till hantverket känns rätt, vilket också gäller batteritiden och WLAN-hastigheten. Dessutom gör en Snapdragon 750G att Mi 10T Lite har en hel del datorkraft. Kameran på 64 MP förtjänar också en del beröm, för den tar skapliga bilder i dagsljus.
Men någonstans har man behövt skära ner. Kameran på Mi 10T Lite kommer inte i närheten av den bildkvalitet dyrare telefoner har. Xiaomis telefon har heller ingen IP-certifiering, men det är i princip alla nackdelarna. En OLED-skärm hade förstås varit att föredra, men med tanke på priset och att resten av utrustningen är bra kan vi inte riktigt vänta oss det också.
Men OLED och billig står inte nödvändigtvis mot varandra: klarar man sig utan en 120 Hz-skärm är Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G ett bra mittenskiktsalternativ till Mi 10T Lite. Om det måste vara OLED, 5G samt bilduppdatering som är snabbare än 60 Hz är OnePlus Nord ett bra exempel, och den kostar för tillfället 4.000 kronor.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G - 12/16/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero