Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Mi 10T - Flaggskeppskraft till lågpris (Sammanfattning)

Gener från toppmodellen. Xiaomi Mi 10T är precis lika snabb som sina motsvarigheter från toppskiktet, Mi 10 och Mi 10 Pro, men den är mycket billigare. Dessutom ligger denna 6.67-tummare före med sin 144 Hz-skärm och sitt batteri på 5.000 mAh, det största i Mi 10-serien, som ger den utmärkt batteritid. Xiaomi Mi 10T:s låga pris märks bara på några få detaljer.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
, , , , , ,
sökrelation
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G (Mi 10 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 650
Minne
6144 MB 
, LPDDR5
Skärm
6.67 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 395 PPI, Kapacitiv, IPS, Gorilla Glass 5, FHD Plus, HDR10, MEMC, glansig: ja, HDR, 144 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108.2 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: USB-C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhetssensor, Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Elektronisk kompass, X-axis linear motor, IR-sändare, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display, Qualcomm TrueWireless Stereo Plus, 2x2 MIMO, Quick Charge 4.0, USB Power Delivery 3.0, Camera2 API Level 3
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/32/38/40/41), 5G (Band 1/3/7/8/20/28/38/41/77/78), SAR Huvud 0.574 W/kg, SAR Kropp 0.996 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.3 x 165.1 x 76.4
Batteri
5000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix 64 MP (Sony IMX682, 0.8 μm, f/1.89, AF, upp till 10x digital zoom), 13 MP ultra-vidvinkelskamera (1.12 μm, FOV 123°, f/2.4), 5 MP makro-kamera (1.12 μm, f/2.4, AF), videoinspelning i upp till 8K i 30 fps
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix 20 MP (Samsung S5K3T2, 0.8 μm, f/2.2), videoinspelning i upp till 1080p i 30 fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Dubbla högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Nätadapter på 33 Watt, USB-C kabel, SIM-verktyg, Skyddsfodral, Användarguide, Garantikort, MIUI 12, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
216 g, Strömförsörjning: 88 g
Pris
500 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
12/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
SD 865, Adreno 650
216 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
88 %
04/2020
OnePlus 8 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
199 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.78"3168x1440
86 %
06/2020
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
219 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
88 %
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
SD 865, Adreno 650
190 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
81 %
07/2019
Xiaomi Mi 9T
SD 730, Adreno 618
191 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.39"2340x1080

Storleksjämförelse

165.1 mm 76.4 mm 9.3 mm 216 g165.3 mm 74.3 mm 8.5 mm 199 g163.3 mm 75.4 mm 8.9 mm 219 g159.8 mm 74.5 mm 8.4 mm 190 g156.7 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 191 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 8 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
876 (767min - 904max) MBit/s ∼100% +42%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
859 (755min - 907max) MBit/s ∼98% +39%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
699 (347min - 764max) MBit/s ∼80% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
618 (560min - 664max) MBit/s ∼71%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=293, last 2 years)
401 MBit/s ∼46% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
293 (161min - 346max) MBit/s ∼33% -53%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 8 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
831 (745min - 872max) MBit/s ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
798 (409min - 853max) MBit/s ∼96% +14%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
770 (741min - 794max) MBit/s ∼93% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
701 (556min - 782max) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=293, last 2 years)
409 MBit/s ∼49% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
333 (297min - 343max) MBit/s ∼40% -52%
04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680720760714556702682711782705650598702689690678777673666763666768741723756675705743637696695672780714556702682711782705650598702689690678777673666763666768741723756675705743637696695672780611641623602597644632562571663642651633635599610627619662618592596664600620623636616560Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø700 (556-782)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø619 (560-664)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G: Översikt
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G: Översikt
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G: Sjö
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G: Sjö
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G: Vägskäl
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G: Vägskäl
Garmin Edge 500: Översikt
Garmin Edge 500: Översikt
Garmin Edge 500: Sjö
Garmin Edge 500: Sjö
Garmin Edge 500: Vägskäl
Garmin Edge 500: Vägskäl

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight - Scene 1Daylight - Scene 2Wide angle5x zoomLow-light environment
ColorChecker
10.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G: 6.01 ∆E min: 2.1 - max: 12.18 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
53 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
64.9 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
75.3 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
89.7 ∆E
69.9 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G: 46.18 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 89.71 ∆E
580
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
604
cd/m²
614
cd/m²
578
cd/m²
596
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 618 cd/m² Medel: 592.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.15 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 614 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1279:1 (Svärta: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
OnePlus 8 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.78
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Mi 9T
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
26%
-13%
-31%
-46%
Brightness middle
614
796
30%
799
30%
714
16%
589
-4%
Brightness
593
779
31%
801
35%
721
22%
589
-1%
Brightness Distribution
92
94
2%
97
5%
95
3%
96
4%
Black Level *
0.48
Contrast
1279
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.9
0.68
24%
1.46
-62%
1.8
-100%
2.5
-178%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.5
1.55
38%
2.92
-17%
5.1
-104%
4.9
-96%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
1.1
31%
2.7
-69%
2
-25%
1.6
-0%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.237 98%
2.237 98%
2.16 102%
2.24 98%
CCT
6744 96%
6310 103%
6003 108%
6588 99%
6544 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2381 Hz ≤ 60 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2381 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 60 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2381 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9716 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 17.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25.2 ms rise
↘ 27.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.2 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
912 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
909 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
923 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
903 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (764 - 924, n=22)
903 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=217, last 2 years)
559 Points ∼61% -39%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3262 Points ∼96%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3318 Points ∼98% +2%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3399 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3252 Points ∼96% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2687 - 3449, n=22)
3267 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=217, last 2 years)
1923 Points ∼57% -41%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11330 Points ∼83%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13471 Points ∼99% +19%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
12129 Points ∼89% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
13276 Points ∼98% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9049 Points ∼67% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10990 - 19989, n=22)
13584 Points ∼100% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=231, last 2 years)
9896 Points ∼73% -13%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
10641 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11153 Points ∼95% +5%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
10347 Points ∼89% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11680 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7533 Points ∼64% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9202 - 15299, n=23)
11246 Points ∼96% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=265, last 2 years)
7803 Points ∼67% -27%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
84035 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
82562 Points ∼97% -2%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
76099 Points ∼89% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
85130 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
35557 Points ∼42% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (56045 - 112989, n=20)
84555 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=217, last 2 years)
39378 Points ∼46% -53%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
149074 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
149017 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
146854 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
110875 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
46605 Points ∼31% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (110875 - 180392, n=20)
147707 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=217, last 2 years)
56697 Points ∼38% -62%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
33255 Points ∼71%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
32240 Points ∼69% -3%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
28985 Points ∼62% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
46963 Points ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
19433 Points ∼41% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (17817 - 58293, n=20)
35224 Points ∼75% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=217, last 2 years)
22969 Points ∼49% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8251 Points ∼93%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8811 Points ∼99% +7%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8215 Points ∼92% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8868 Points ∼99% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3196 Points ∼36% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8215 - 9611, n=20)
8915 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=258, last 2 years)
3323 Points ∼37% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
10665 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11371 Points ∼97% +7%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11569 Points ∼98% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11632 Points ∼99% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3184 Points ∼27% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10599 - 13305, n=20)
11750 Points ∼100% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=258, last 2 years)
3904 Points ∼33% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
4604 Points ∼93%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4928 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3965 Points ∼80% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
4841 Points ∼98% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3239 Points ∼66% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3965 - 5274, n=20)
4844 Points ∼98% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=258, last 2 years)
2719 Points ∼55% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8917 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9807 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8652 Points ∼88% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
9213 Points ∼94% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3312 Points ∼34% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8499 - 11492, n=21)
9633 Points ∼98% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=270, last 2 years)
3809 Points ∼39% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
13044 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12665 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
12547 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11956 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3316 Points ∼25% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11956 - 16809, n=21)
12917 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=270, last 2 years)
4799 Points ∼37% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
4231 Points ∼77%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5480 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3956 Points ∼72% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5110 Points ∼93% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3296 Points ∼60% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3956 - 5765, n=21)
5126 Points ∼94% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=268, last 2 years)
2844 Points ∼52% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5996 Points ∼80%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7117 Points ∼95% +19%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
7265 Points ∼97% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
7500 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2192 Points ∼29% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5996 - 7653, n=21)
7103 Points ∼95% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=256, last 2 years)
2605 Points ∼35% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
6511 Points ∼75%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8106 Points ∼94% +24%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8365 Points ∼97% +28%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8629 Points ∼100% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2008 Points ∼23% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (6500 - 9167, n=20)
8128 Points ∼94% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=256, last 2 years)
2771 Points ∼32% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
4695 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4987 Points ∼97% +6%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
4958 Points ∼96% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5144 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3227 Points ∼63% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 5209, n=20)
4941 Points ∼96% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=256, last 2 years)
2764 Points ∼54% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
7960 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8111 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8145 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
7517 Points ∼92% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2347 Points ∼29% -71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7517 - 8947, n=22)
8072 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=268, last 2 years)
3095 Points ∼38% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
9551 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9379 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
9466 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8633 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2176 Points ∼23% -77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8633 - 11999, n=21)
9504 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=268, last 2 years)
3443 Points ∼36% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5028 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5506 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5466 Points ∼99% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5176 Points ∼94% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3241 Points ∼59% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4733 - 5780, n=21)
5315 Points ∼97% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=268, last 2 years)
2900 Points ∼53% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
6525 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6618 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
6106 Points ∼92% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
6174 Points ∼93% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2060 Points ∼31% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 6961, n=20)
6202 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 6977, n=210, last 2 years)
2631 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8358 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8279 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8265 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
7618 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1917 Points ∼23% -77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7618 - 9104, n=19)
8249 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 11259, n=210, last 2 years)
2969 Points ∼36% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3691 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3888 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3193 Points ∼82% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3712 Points ∼95% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2786 Points ∼72% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1786 - 4061, n=19)
3414 Points ∼88% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=210, last 2 years)
2645 Points ∼68% -28%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
50 fps ∼42%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼51% +20%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps ∼51% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
118 fps ∼100% +136%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
58 fps ∼49% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 138, n=22)
76.1 fps ∼64% +52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=215, last 2 years)
55.8 fps ∼47% +12%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
209 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
206 fps ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
205 fps ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
207 fps ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
77 fps ∼37% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (168 - 266, n=22)
206 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=215, last 2 years)
103 fps ∼49% -51%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
50 fps ∼45%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼54% +20%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps ∼54% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
111 fps ∼100% +122%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼31% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 111, n=22)
72.3 fps ∼65% +45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=213, last 2 years)
44 fps ∼40% -12%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
118 fps ∼94%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
126 fps ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
125 fps ∼99% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
119 fps ∼94% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼30% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (96 - 151, n=22)
123 fps ∼98% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=214, last 2 years)
60.6 fps ∼48% -49%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
50 fps ∼60%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼72% +20%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
59 fps ∼71% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
83 fps ∼100% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼29% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (43 - 83, n=23)
60.8 fps ∼73% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=211, last 2 years)
34.5 fps ∼42% -31%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
89 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
88 fps ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
84 fps ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼30% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (67 - 103, n=23)
85.9 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=211, last 2 years)
41.5 fps ∼47% -53%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
45 fps ∼94%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼94% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
44 fps ∼92% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
48 fps ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼27% -71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (25 - 54, n=23)
41.1 fps ∼86% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=210, last 2 years)
21.7 fps ∼45% -52%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
52 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
51 fps ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
51 fps ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼31% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (39 - 62, n=23)
51 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=210, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼48% -52%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
46 fps ∼96%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
46 fps ∼96% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
48 fps ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼31% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28 - 57, n=24)
43.8 fps ∼91% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=271, last 2 years)
21.5 fps ∼45% -53%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
54 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
54 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
47 fps ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼30% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (27 - 67, n=24)
52.7 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=271, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼46% -54%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
29 fps ∼91%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼97% +7%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
29 fps ∼91% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
32 fps ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9.3 fps ∼29% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (18 - 40, n=24)
28.3 fps ∼88% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=272, last 2 years)
14.3 fps ∼45% -51%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
20 fps ∼98%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
20 fps ∼98% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
20 fps ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.1 fps ∼30% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (20 - 27, n=24)
20.5 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=271, last 2 years)
9.81 fps ∼48% -51%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
591390 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
585231 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
569967 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
572485 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (527301 - 631025, n=23)
580364 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=180, last 2 years)
333545 Points ∼56% -44%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5856 Points ∼93%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5993 Points ∼96% +2%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
6273 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5555 Points ∼89% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼53% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5264 - 6402, n=22)
5898 Points ∼94% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=199, last 2 years)
3536 Points ∼56% -40%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
9440 Points ∼94%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10058 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
10075 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
9458 Points ∼94% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6760 Points ∼67% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8412 - 10147, n=22)
9662 Points ∼96% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=199, last 2 years)
6486 Points ∼64% -31%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
7389 Points ∼83%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7240 Points ∼82% -2%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8874 Points ∼100% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5304 Points ∼60% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4646 Points ∼52% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5304 - 8874, n=22)
7150 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=199, last 2 years)
4129 Points ∼47% -44%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11930 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11842 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11736 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11833 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3559 Points ∼30% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11399 - 13833, n=22)
11798 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=199, last 2 years)
5466 Points ∼46% -54%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
1413 Points ∼88%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1496 Points ∼93% +6%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
1456 Points ∼91% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
1604 Points ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1099 Points ∼69% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1276 - 2169, n=22)
1506 Points ∼94% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=199, last 2 years)
1252 Points ∼78% -11%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.66)
70.107 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
67.698 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=19)
63.5 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
63.374 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=182, last 2 years)
49.7 Points ∼71% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
47.131 Points ∼67% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
45.219 Points ∼64% -36%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
119.9 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.66)
117.29 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.78 Points ∼96% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145, n=20)
113 Points ∼94% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=191, last 2 years)
88.1 Points ∼73% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
87.488 Points ∼73% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
74.18 Points ∼62% -37%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
74.5 runs/min ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chome 80)
67.7 runs/min ∼91% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.66)
67.4 runs/min ∼90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=18)
63.8 runs/min ∼86% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=162, last 2 years)
50.6 runs/min ∼68% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
46.46 runs/min ∼62% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
42.1 runs/min ∼57% -38%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
127 Points ∼100% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=22)
107 Points ∼84% +4%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
104 Points ∼82% +1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
103 Points ∼81% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.66)
103 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
86 Points ∼68% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=201, last 2 years)
77.1 Points ∼61% -25%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
24369 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.66)
24334 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
23678 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=22)
22442 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
17501 Points ∼72% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=209, last 2 years)
17018 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
14606 Points ∼60% -40%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=212, last 2 years)
4185 ms * ∼100% -103%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)
2910.8 ms * ∼70% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
2563.9 ms * ∼61% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.66)
2057.6 ms * ∼49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=23)
2035 ms * ∼49% +1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
1993.1 ms * ∼48% +3%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
1944.7 ms * ∼46% +5%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 10T 5GOnePlus 8 ProXiaomi Poco F2 ProSamsung Galaxy S20 FE 5GXiaomi Mi 9TAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-4%
2%
-3%
-60%
4%
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB
1635.44
1627.3
0%
1634.45
0%
1528.12
-7%
492.74
-70%
1559 (1330 - 1730, n=16)
-5%
729 (41.9 - 2037, n=277, last 2 years)
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB
721.66
730.4
1%
721.95
0%
676.12
-6%
179.19
-75%
765 (527 - 1095, n=16)
6%
316 (11.9 - 1321, n=277, last 2 years)
-56%
Random Read 4KB
231
208.3
-10%
229.74
-1%
228.4
-1%
128.65
-44%
235 (133 - 317, n=16)
2%
130 (13.5 - 325, n=277, last 2 years)
-44%
Random Write 4KB
211.22
197.7
-6%
226.45
7%
218.37
3%
107.82
-49%
235 (121 - 306, n=16)
11%
114 (4.97 - 330, n=277, last 2 years)
-46%
01020304050607080901001101201201181201191201211201181201191211211211191221181191201211191191201221181201201201191211201201211201181211191191191191201211181211211201201211201191221201201201201191201181191131201201191201201201201201201201191201201201201201211201211221191191191201181191211221211191191201201201201201201201201201201201201211201191211161201181181201221201171201181221191201181161171201191191201181211211201171221201191201201201201201201201201201201201201201201201201201201201201181201191201211201181201191211211211191221181191201211191191201221181201201201191211201201211201181211191191191191201211181211211201201211201191221201201201201191201181191131201201191201201201201201201201191201201201201201211201211221191191191201181191211221211191191201201201201201201201201201201201201211201191211161201181181201221201171201181221191201181161171201191191201181211211201171221201191201201201201201201201201201201201201201201201201201201202930303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302830303030303030303030303031303030303030303030303030302931303030303030303030293031302930303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.55.5: Ø120 (113-122)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.1.0: Ø30 (28-31)
Hög belastning
 37.1 °C37.1 °C37.3 °C 
 36.2 °C36.3 °C37.6 °C 
 34.9 °C36.2 °C35.7 °C 
Max: 37.6 °C
Medel: 36.5 °C
32.9 °C34.6 °C35.4 °C
32.4 °C34.2 °C35.1 °C
31.2 °C33.8 °C33.7 °C
Max: 35.4 °C
Medel: 33.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  25.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.542.52534.936.83124.636.94024.736.55030.939.76323.637.18017.736.810016.537.112514.14316012.65020012.746.825012.15331512.460.340013.56450012.168.363012.271.280011.673.6100010.976.7125012.178.916001280.5200012.382.2250012.682.5315012.582.5400012.881.2500013.177.2630013.776.1800013.776.21000013.569.41250014.361.11600014.760.2SPL24.891.3N0.685.2median 12.6median 71.2Delta0.810.242.237.131.226.127.226.323.729.53136.122.726.522.821.824.425.520.93120.350.919.154.316.453.31657.217.661.915.265.414.670.115.470.214.874.315.274.815.675.514.876.914.678.914.380.614.678.514.774.315.375.115.379.314.980.915.367.715.651.727.3890.977.1median 15.3median 70.21.210.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 10T 5GXiaomi Mi 9T
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi 9T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.18 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.52 / 2.11 / 2.24 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.5 / 9 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
5000 mAh
OnePlus 8 Pro
4510 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
4700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-89%
-91%
14%
39%
-24%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.52
2.2
-323%
2
-285%
0.75
-44%
0.54
-4%
1.123 (0.52 - 2.2, n=21)
-116%
0.931 (0.37 - 2.5, n=229, last 2 years)
-79%
Idle Average *
2.11
3.3
-56%
3.1
-47%
1.41
33%
0.95
55%
2.08 (1.19 - 3.43, n=21)
1%
1.846 (0.82 - 3.94, n=229, last 2 years)
13%
Idle Maximum *
2.24
3.7
-65%
4
-79%
1.44
36%
1.08
52%
2.31 (1.23 - 4, n=21)
-3%
2.12 (0.85 - 4.2, n=229, last 2 years)
5%
Load Average *
5.5
5.9
-7%
6.4
-16%
3.84
30%
2.7
51%
5.18 (3.5 - 7.4, n=21)
6%
4.43 (2.1 - 8.4, n=229, last 2 years)
19%
Load Maximum *
9
8.3
8%
11.6
-29%
7.67
15%
5.4
40%
9.66 (7.67 - 12.3, n=21)
-7%
7.22 (3.16 - 12.3, n=229, last 2 years)
20%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
51tim 49min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
19tim 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
24tim 08min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 52min
Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G
5000 mAh
OnePlus 8 Pro
4510 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
4700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-20%
-15%
-25%
-19%
Reader / Idle
3109
2103
-32%
1954
-37%
2010
-35%
2138
-31%
H.264
1448
1023
-29%
1466
1%
1232
-15%
1208
-17%
WiFi v1.3
1166
923
-21%
923
-21%
763
-35%
991
-15%
Load
292
296
1%
286
-2%
255
-13%
258
-12%

För

+ Hantverk av hög kvalitet
+ 5G och dual-SIM
+ VoLTE och VoWiFi
+ Ljusstark IPS-skärm
+ 144 Hz och MEMC
+ Toppskikts-SoC
+ Stryps inte vid belastning
+ Utmärkt batteritid
+ Väldigt snabb laddning

Emot

- Ingen IP-certifiering
- Ingen microSD-plats
- Svag vidvinkelskamera
- Ingen AMOLED-skärm
- PWM
- Ingen trådlös laddning

Omdöme - Bra alternativ till Xiaomi Mi 10

Recension av Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G. Recensionsex från
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G. Recensionsex från

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Det var värt att vänta på ett billigare alternativ till Mi 10. Xiaomi Mi 10T på 6.67 tum använder samma toppskikts-SoC i form av en Snapdragon 865 som sin mer avancerade motsvarighet och är därför precis lika snabb. Batteriet på 5.000 mAh hjälper till och med Mi 10T att uppnå totalt sett bättre batteritid. Ett annat unikt säljargument är att den har 144 Hz bilduppdatering. Mi 10 har bara stöd för maximalt 120 Hz.

Xiaomi Mi 10T får poäng för en riktigt snabb SoC, en 144 Hz-skärm, lång batteritid och bra hantverk. Det är bara kameran som inte riktigt lever upp till vad den lovat.

Mi 10T tar samma väg som Mi 9T: istället för att fokusera på toppskiktskomponenter har den också delar från mittenskiktet, vilket sänker priset.

Således har man fått kompromissa, men inte särskilt mycket: Den saknar trådlös laddning, Mi 10T Pro har en bättre kamera och istället för en AMOLED-skärm får man en IPS-variant. Men skärmen gör ändå ett ganska bra jobb och övertygar med hög ljusstyrka och hög kontrast.

Xiaomi Mi 10T är för tillfället en av de billigaste telefonerna som kommer med en Snapdragon 865. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro är ett alternativ: den har samma SoC, samma formfaktor och är en aning billigare. Dessutom har den en AMOLED-skärm och kommer med en pop-up kamera i likhet med Mi 9T.

Xiaomi Mi 10T 5G - 11/30/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Design
85%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
53 / 70 → 76%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
90%
Spelprestanda
61 / 64 → 96%
Programprestanda
82 / 86 → 95%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 83%
Camera
66%
Medel
80%
86%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Stephanie Chamberlain
Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 333 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020
contact me via: LinkedIn
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Mi 10T - Flaggskeppskraft till lågpris (Sammanfattning)
Manuel Masiero, 2020-12-10 (Update: 2020-12-10)