Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Core i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070) Tongfang GK7CP7S Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Rekommenderas. Om du letar efter en enkel och relativt kompakt spellaptop så kan Schenker XMG Neo 17 vara datorn för dig. Denna laptop på 17.3 tum får höga poäng för sin kraftfulla hårdvara, sin 144 hz-skärm och sitt optomekaniska tangentbord. Men kan Neo 17 tävla mot andra stora bärbara speldatorer med mer än bara sina specifikationer?
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Tongfang GK7CP7S)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1215 MHz, Minne: 1440 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 419.35, Optimus
Minne
32 GB 
, 2 x 16 GB SODIMM DDR4-2666, dubbla kanaler, alla platser upptagna
Skärm
17.30 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel HM370
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB 
, 2 x M.2 Typ 2280-enhetsplatser & 1 x 2.5 tums-enhetsplats
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Dedikerade 3.5 mm-anslutningar för hörlurar och mikrofon, Kortläsare: MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC
Nätverk
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 27.5 x 396 x 261
Batteri
46.74 Wh, 4100 mAh Litiumpolymer, 3 celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.1, Tangentbord: Optomekaniskt, RGB, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 230 W, musmatta, rengöringsduk, nyckelring, XMG-klistermärke, Återställnings-DVD, USB-minne, tillbehör till 2.5 tums-enhetsplatsen, BullGuard Internet Security - 1 års licens, Control Center, 36 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.5 kg, Strömförsörjning: 680 g
Pris
2655 EUR
Länkar
SCHENKER hemsida
SCHENKER kategori
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

❌
412.6 mm 304.9 mm 23 mm 2.8 kg399 mm 273 mm 26.4 mm 2.9 kg397 mm 268.5 mm 27.5 mm 2.6 kg396 mm 261 mm 27.5 mm 2.5 kg399 mm 272 mm 19 mm 2.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Vänster: Kensington-lås, Luftinsläpp, RJ45-LAN, USB 2.0 Typ A, Mikrofonjack, Hörlursjack
Vänster: Kensington-lås, Luftinsläpp, RJ45-LAN, USB 2.0 Typ A, Mikrofonjack, Hörlursjack
Höger: Kortläsare, 2 x USB 3.0 Typ A
Höger: Kortläsare, 2 x USB 3.0 Typ A
Baksidan: 2 x Mini DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0 Typ C, ström
Baksidan: 2 x Mini DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0 Typ C, ström
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s +25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s
MSI GE75 8SF
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.2 MB/s -66%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (26 - 269, n=93, last 2 years)
122.3 MB/s +39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s -3%
MSI GE75 8SF
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33.25 MB/s -62%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=5, last 2 years)
1135 MBit/s +68%
MSI GE75 8SF
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
686 MBit/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 MBit/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
605 MBit/s -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
356 MBit/s -47%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=5, last 2 years)
1369 MBit/s +106%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
679 MBit/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
663 MBit/s
MSI GE75 8SF
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
658 MBit/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
599 MBit/s -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
598 MBit/s -10%
En titt inuti Schenker XMG Neo 17
Undersidan av XMG Neo 17:s hölje med en förinstallerad värmeplatta
Schenker har utrustat vår recensionsenhet med en Samsung 970 Evo Plus SSD-enhet på 1 TB
En titt på en av XMG Neo 17:s två fläktar
Det finns också plats för att lägga till ytterligare en M.2 2280 SSD
XMG Neo 17 har två SODIMM-platser som är dolda bakom ett svart hölje
XMG Neo 17 har en 2.5 tums-enhetsplats om du behöver mer lagring
TXMG Neo 17 har ett Lithium Polymer-batteri på 46.74 Wh
TXMG Neo 17 har ett Lithium Polymer-batteri på 46.74 Wh
285
cd/m²		283
cd/m²		274
cd/m²
302
cd/m²		304
cd/m²		294
cd/m²
281
cd/m²		289
cd/m²		287
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 304 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 288.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 304 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1169:1 (Svärta: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.75 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, 1920x1080		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, 1920x1080		MSI GE75 8SF
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 1920x1080		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080
Display
-5%
-1%
-2%
-4%
Display P3 Coverage
65.2
62.9
-4%
63.1
-3%
64
-2%
62.9
-4%
sRGB Coverage
92.2
87.1
-6%
94.4
2%
90.4
-2%
87.8
-5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.5
63.7
-4%
65.2
-2%
64.8
-3%
63.9
-4%
Response Times
7%
872%
5%
41%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
18.8 ?(9.6, 9.2)
17.6 ?(8.4, 9.2)
6%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
49%
15.6 ?(8, 7.6)
17%
7.2 ?(3.6, 3.6)
62%
Response Time Black / White *
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
7%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
13%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
-7%
9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)
20%
PWM Frequency
971 ?(99)
25770 ?(17)
2554%
Screen
-6%
19%
-42%
4%
Brightness middle
304
295
-3%
370.4
22%
299.1
-2%
288
-5%
Brightness
289
291
1%
348
20%
273
-6%
287
-1%
Brightness Distribution
90
96
7%
89
-1%
81
-10%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.26
0.24
8%
0.29
-12%
0.27
-4%
0.2
23%
Contrast
1169
1229
5%
1277
9%
1108
-5%
1440
23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.65
3.2
-21%
1.26
52%
5.07
-91%
2.33
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.11
6.64
-9%
3.02
51%
10.55
-73%
5.34
13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.5
2.52
-68%
1.21
19%
3.31
-121%
2.47
-65%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.75
2.16
21%
1.4
49%
6.8
-147%
1.19
57%
Gamma
2.46 89%
2.46 89%
2.2 100%
2.46 89%
2.41 91%
CCT
6763 96%
6872 95%
6747 96%
7805 83%
6710 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
57
-5%
59.7
0%
58.5
-2%
57
-5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
87
-5%
94.4
3%
89.9
-2%
88
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / -4%
297% / 166%
-13% / -29%
14% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.6 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 971 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 971 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 971 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø969 (904.79-1042.12)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1187 (1126.76-1226.54)
MSI GE75 8SF Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø918 (910.89-1045.5)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1139 (1122.59-1232.82)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1112 (1090.93-1218.55)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points +54%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H
167 Points -4%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3074 Points +195%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H
1233 Points +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
1227 Points +18%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1218 Points +17%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
1066 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
1042 Points
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (2.62 - 3.73, n=23, last 2 years)
3.21 Points +62%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.94 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 64.3, n=24, last 2 years)
35.6 Points +209%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
13.5 Points +17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.51 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.98 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
11.51 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1042 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7573 Points +40%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6053 Points +12%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5596 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5555 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5411 Points
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5138 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		MSI GE75 8SF
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
AS SSD
-57%
-80%
-41%
-16%
Seq Read
2359
1315
-44%
949
-60%
1153
-51%
911
-61%
Seq Write
2469
927
-62%
823
-67%
1328
-46%
2347
-5%
4K Read
53.5
52.4
-2%
25.36
-53%
35.05
-34%
53
-1%
4K Write
117.6
122.8
4%
67.1
-43%
96
-18%
122.5
4%
4K-64 Read
1579
326.5
-79%
748
-53%
727
-54%
1577
0%
4K-64 Write
2048
727
-65%
650
-68%
1212
-41%
1734
-15%
Access Time Read *
0.048
0.11
-129%
0.173
-260%
0.063
-31%
0.08
-67%
Access Time Write *
0.03
0.045
-50%
0.059
-97%
0.04
-33%
0.031
-3%
Score Read
1869
510
-73%
869
-54%
878
-53%
1721
-8%
Score Write
2413
942
-61%
799
-67%
1441
-40%
2091
-13%
Score Total
5248
1715
-67%
2109
-60%
2784
-47%
4771
-9%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3477 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3332 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 337.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 289.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1259 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1363 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 92.7 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=233, last 2 years)
29268 Points +48%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
21515 Points +9%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20236 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
19800 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
19236 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
18520 Points -6%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (280 - 14457, n=152, last 2 years)
7658 Points +87%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4655 Points +13%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4231 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4102 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4009 Points -2%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=229, last 2 years)
40173 Points +59%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29453 Points +17%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
26097 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
25765 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
25248 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
24172 Points -4%
3DMark 11 Performance
18150 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29348 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15686 poäng
Hjälp
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø73.8 (65-79)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø70.1 (61-75)
MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1: Ø70.8 (55-76)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ: Ø69.7 (63-76)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø80.8 (71-85)
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=165, last 2 years)
218 fps +59%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
151 (123min) fps +10%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
144.2 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
137 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
133.6 fps -2%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
115.7 fps -16%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years)
116.1 fps +59%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
81.7 (68min) fps +12%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
73.1 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
73 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
71.8 fps -2%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
70.9 fps -3%
låg med. hög ultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 137 73 49.5
Apex Legends (2019) 143 134 132 88.2 45.4
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 94 92 82 74 42
Metro Exodus (2019) 87.9 66.4 54.1 42 26.1
Anthem (2019) 88.8 85.4 79.8 62 35.5
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 143 117 75.2 62.1
The Division 2 (2019) 113 95 78 60 33

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
29 / 32 / 33 dB(A)
Hög belastning
42 / 49 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-6%
-5%
6%
-2%
7%
off / environment *
29
29
-0%
28.3
2%
28.3
2%
29
-0%
24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=183, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Minimum *
29
29
-0%
33.5
-16%
31.5
-9%
29
-0%
25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=184, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Average *
32
32
-0%
33.6
-5%
31.6
1%
32
-0%
27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=184, last 2 years)
14%
Idle Maximum *
33
40
-21%
35
-6%
31.6
4%
33
-0%
30.8 ?(21.9 - 47, n=184, last 2 years)
7%
Load Average *
42
46
-10%
38
10%
32.3
23%
47
-12%
43 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=184, last 2 years)
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
51
-4%
50
-2%
43
12%
49
-0%
Load Maximum *
49
52
-6%
56.9
-16%
45.5
7%
51
-4%
53.4 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=184, last 2 years)
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 45 °C47 °C44 °C 
 39 °C46 °C37 °C 
 31 °C35 °C33 °C 
Max: 47 °C
Medel: 39.7 °C
46 °C52 °C53 °C
45 °C56 °C39 °C
30 °C30 °C27 °C
Max: 56 °C
Medel: 42 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  48 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-14%
9%
4%
1%
-2%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
59
-26%
41.2
12%
38.6
18%
53
-13%
46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=183, last 2 years)
2%
Maximum Bottom *
56
54
4%
46
18%
43.6
22%
50
11%
49.5 ?(30 - 66.3, n=183, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Upper Side *
28
33
-18%
26.2
6%
30.2
-8%
27
4%
31.4 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=183, last 2 years)
-12%
Idle Bottom *
30
35
-17%
30.2
-1%
35
-17%
30
-0%
32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=183, last 2 years)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.144.92539.840.53130.732.14036.235.35027.527.86325.928.68027.231.110025.236.612522.233.316021.243.42002249.625021.452.631520.354.640019.753.350018.455.363017.563.680017.262.8100017.261.7125017.860.5160017.456.8200017.357.825001855.3315017.750400017.854.5500017.749.3630017.452.2800017.549.61000017.4481250017.350.21600017.252.2SPL29.969.5N1.325median 17.7median 52.6Delta1.63.339.145.536.641.328.330.731.433.53627.826.73230.738.628.252.924.752.122.756.223.463.523.165.520.366.318.764.617.866.81868.317.368.617.468.617.966.717.765.817.165.217.265.317.466.117.362.517.66117.66017.362.117.357.917.251.417.143.129.977.41.343.6median 17.6median 64.61.74.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 17Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.5 / 1.8 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 13 / 16 / 21 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 96 / 191 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-27%
-19%
-22%
-23%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
13
19
-46%
16.4
-26%
20.2
-55%
19
-46%
13.7 ?(2 - 64, n=178, last 2 years)
-5%
Idle Average *
16
22
-38%
21.9
-37%
27.2
-70%
22
-38%
19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=178, last 2 years)
-19%
Idle Maximum *
21
29
-38%
25.4
-21%
28.7
-37%
30
-43%
26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=178, last 2 years)
-28%
Load Average *
96
102
-6%
90.7
6%
90.8
5%
104
-8%
110.9 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years)
-16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
172
190
-10%
203.3
-18%
152.1
12%
167
3%
Load Maximum *
191
231
-21%
222.9
-17%
165.4
13%
203
-6%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years)
-31%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
5tim 15min
WiFi Websurfing
3tim 44min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
0tim 55min
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 46.74 Wh		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 66 Wh		MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 65 Wh		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 76 Wh		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 76 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
15%
-5%
-15%
-2%
63%
Reader / Idle
315
372
18%
298
-5%
544 ?(57 - 1290, n=84, last 2 years)
73%
WiFi v1.3
224
235
5%
212
-5%
190
-15%
230
3%
368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years)
64%
Load
55
67
22%
52
-5%
84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years)
53%
Witcher 3 ultra
52
81.6 ?(47 - 155, n=22, last 2 years)

För

+ många konfigurationsmöjligheter
+ mekaniskt tangentbord
+ många tillbehör ingår
+ användbar mjukvara
+ jämförelsevis lätt för en laptop på 17.3 tum
+ tangentbord med RGB-bakgrundsbelysning
+ stabilt hölje
+ bra IPS-skärm
+ kraftfull
+ tunn skärminfattning
+ 144 Hz-skärm

Emot

- styrplattan var en besvikelse
- högt fläktljud vid belastning
- processorn har begränsade turbo-klockfrekvenser
- WiFi-prestandan var en besvikelse
- högtalarna kunde varit bättre
- ingen Thunderbolt 3
- litet batteri
Recension av Schenker XMG Neo 17. Recensionsex från Schenker Technologies.
Recension av Schenker XMG Neo 17. Recensionsex från Schenker Technologies.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Schenker XMG Neo 17 är i stort en utmärkt spellaptop på 17 tum. Skärmen är en fröjd för ögat med ett högt kontrastförhållande och bilduppdatering i 144 Hz tillsammans med en tunn infattning. Vidare imponerande den på oss i våra speltester tack vare en RTX 2070 GPU samtidigt som det mekaniska RGB-belysta tangentbordet var ett nöje att skriva på.

Neo 17 går dessutom att konfigurera så gott som helt fritt och den kommer med massor av tillbehör, vilket alltid är välkommet. Höljet från Tongfang Barebone är dessutom jämförelsevis kompakt och lätt även om det är en aning tjockt.

Men Schenker behöver åtgärda ett antal saker för att få toppbetyg. För det första behöver efterföljaren till Neo 17 åtminstone ett större batteri som alternativ tillsammans med en bättra styrplatta och bättre högtalare. Vidare skulle de behöva byta plats på WiFi-kortet så att det kan få ut mer av sin potential samt justera fläktkontrollen så att datorn kan använda CPU-turbo i det balanserade fläktläget. Totalt sett hindrar inte dessa brister XMG Neo 17 från att få ett skapligt genomsnittsbetyg, men de hindrar den från att vara den spellaptop på 17 tum som andra kommer att se upp till under året.

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 - 05/14/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Design
80 / 98 → 82%
Tangentbord
89%
Mus
72%
Anslutningar
60 / 80 → 75%
Vikt
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Batteri
56 / 95 → 59%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
92%
Programprestanda
90%
Temperatur
83 / 95 → 88%
Ljudnivå
80 / 90 → 89%
Audio
60%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Medel
73%
83%
Gaming - Vägt medel

More articles related to this device

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Uniwill Technology Serie)
Test
•
Recension av Uniwill Technolog...

Pricecompare

Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Core i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070) Tongfang GK7CP7S Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Florian Glaser, 2019-03-29 (Update: 2019-03-29)