Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE - En av de bästa surfplattorna du kan få tag på för under 3.000 kronor (Sammanfattning)

En bra investering. Alla kan erbjuda en dyr surfplatta, men det är bara ett fåtal tillverkare som har billiga surfplattor med bra utrustning och bra prestanda. En sådan är Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE, för den passar in perfekt på den beskrivningen och med ett pris på 2.900 kronor är den en av de bästa surfplattorna i sin prisklass.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
, , , , , ,
sökrelation
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Galaxy Tab A Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Kryo 260, Snapdragon 662
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Minne
3072 MB 
Skärm
10.40 tum 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixlar 224 PPI, Kapacitiv, TFT-LCD, WUXGA+, 16 miljoner färger, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 18 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 1TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Geomagnetisk sensor, Hall-sensor, Ljussensor, Wi-Fi Direct, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 66), Kropp SAR 1.01 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7 x 247.6 x 157.4
Batteri
7040 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix 8 MP, Autofokus, Video i upp till 1920 x 1080 pixlar i 30 fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix 5 MP
Övrigt
Högtalare: 4 högtalare med Dolby Atmos, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare på 7.8W, USB-kabel (USB-C till USB-A), SIM-verktyg, Snabbstartsguide, One UI 2.5, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
477 g, Strömförsörjning: 32 g
Pris
290 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82 %
11/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
SD 662, Adreno 610
477 g7 mm10.40"2000x1200
79 %
12/2019
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3
504 g9.8 mm10.10"1920x1200
85 %
05/2020
Huawei MatePad 10.4
Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6
460 g7.35 mm10.40"2000x1200
79 %
01/2020
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
SD 439, Adreno 505
580 g23 mm10.10"1920x1200
81 %
06/2019
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2
460 g7.5 mm10.10"1920x1200

Storleksjämförelse

262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 504 g242 mm 166 mm 23 mm 580 g247.6 mm 157.4 mm 7 mm 477 g245.2 mm 149.4 mm 7.5 mm 460 g245.2 mm 155 mm 7.35 mm 460 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash
332 (310min - 353max) MBit/s ∼100%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mali-G72 MP3, MT8183, 32 GB eMMC Flash
299 (279min - 310max) MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 32 GB eMMC Flash
290 (274min - 309max) MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 32 GB eMMC Flash
264 (204min - 332max) MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
Adreno 505, SD 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash
223 (143min - 310max) MBit/s ∼67% -33%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash
329 (323min - 333max) MBit/s ∼100%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mali-G72 MP3, MT8183, 32 GB eMMC Flash
321 (302min - 327max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 32 GB eMMC Flash
298 (239min - 314max) MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
Adreno 505, SD 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash
164 (100min - 233max) MBit/s ∼50% -50%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 32 GB eMMC Flash
56.5 (48min - 74max) MBit/s ∼17% -83%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340327325326332332329333323331326330328329331330330325332332330326329331332327331329325329330327325326332332329333323331326330328329331330330325332332330326329331332327331329325329330333329333331310353330337329327312348333330317335327336330335334337331336336332340334329337Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (323-333)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø332 (310-353)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE: Fullständig rutt
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE: Fullständig rutt
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE: Sjö
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE: Sjö
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE: Vändplats
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE: Vändplats
Garmin Edge 500: Fullständig rutt
Garmin Edge 500: Fullständig rutt
Garmin Edge 500: Sjö
Garmin Edge 500: Sjö
Garmin Edge 500: Vändplats
Garmin Edge 500: Vändplats

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 25-facher ZoomLowlight
ColorChecker
11.2 ∆E
9 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020): 7.53 ∆E min: 2.19 - max: 13.36 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.2 ∆E
53.2 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
53.1 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
66 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
76.6 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
45.5 ∆E
89.9 ∆E
70.4 ∆E
51.8 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020): 46.5 ∆E min: 13.41 - max: 89.94 ∆E
317
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 370 cd/m² Medel: 337.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.66 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 82 %
Mitt på batteriet: 365 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1404:1 (Svärta: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.12
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
TFT-LCD, 2000x1200, 10.40
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Huawei MatePad 10.4
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.40
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.10
Screen
-5%
-14%
8%
-2%
Brightness middle
365
449
23%
511
40%
392
7%
401
10%
Brightness
337
425
26%
472
40%
359
7%
396
18%
Brightness Distribution
82
89
9%
85
4%
88
7%
86
5%
Black Level *
0.26
0.6
-131%
0.53
-104%
0.36
-38%
0.5
-92%
Contrast
1404
748
-47%
964
-31%
1089
-22%
802
-43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
3.1
31%
4.6
-2%
2.7
40%
2.9
36%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.8
6.4
18%
10.3
-32%
5.4
31%
5.8
26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.3
3.8
28%
6.5
-23%
3.8
28%
4.1
23%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.09 105%
2.19 100%
2.24 98%
2.36 93%
CCT
7702 84%
7202 90%
7553 86%
7276 89%
7263 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15315 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.4 ms rise
↘ 25.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Huawei MatePad 10.4
592 Points ∼31% +87%
Average of class Tablet (133 - 1716, n=34, last 2 years)
591 Points ∼31% +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
316 Points ∼16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (305 - 316, n=8)
312 Points ∼16% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
239 Points ∼12% -24%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (455 - 7378, n=34, last 2 years)
2170 Points ∼13% +57%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
1890 Points ∼11% +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1381 Points ∼8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1234 - 1453, n=8)
1355 Points ∼8% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
596 Points ∼4% -57%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score
Huawei MatePad 10.4
9189 Points ∼46% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
8036 Points ∼40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (7247 - 8714, n=8)
7986 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Tablet (2719 - 14982, n=21, last 2 years)
7792 Points ∼39% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
6456 Points ∼32% -20%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
6284 Points ∼31% -22%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
6154 Points ∼31% -23%
Work 2.0 performance score
Huawei MatePad 10.4
7695 Points ∼50% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (5866 - 7184, n=9)
6258 Points ∼41% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
6193 Points ∼40%
Average of class Tablet (4412 - 12603, n=28, last 2 years)
5878 Points ∼38% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5452 Points ∼36% -12%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
5056 Points ∼33% -18%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
4412 Points ∼29% -29%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (2902 - 110846, n=23, last 2 years)
36813 Points ∼13% +63%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
34686 Points ∼12% +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
22576 Points ∼8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (22131 - 22897, n=4)
22483 Points ∼8% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
19435 Points ∼7% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13608 Points ∼5% -40%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
13151 Points ∼5% -42%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average of class Tablet (2468 - 221941, n=23, last 2 years)
57685 Points ∼9% +144%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
46944 Points ∼7% +98%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
23675 Points ∼4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (23379 - 24043, n=4)
23648 Points ∼4% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
19615 Points ∼3% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13794 Points ∼2% -42%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
13385 Points ∼2% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (7561 - 51436, n=23, last 2 years)
21038 Points ∼22% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
19422 Points ∼20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (18647 - 19804, n=4)
19225 Points ∼20% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
18829 Points ∼19% -3%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
18123 Points ∼19% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
12994 Points ∼13% -33%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
12391 Points ∼13% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Huawei MatePad 10.4
3338 Points ∼30% +80%
Average of class Tablet (252 - 9238, n=30, last 2 years)
2498 Points ∼22% +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1858 Points ∼17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1797 - 1889, n=7)
1846 Points ∼16% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1610 Points ∼14% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
814 Points ∼7% -56%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
813 Points ∼7% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Huawei MatePad 10.4
3327 Points ∼20% +92%
Average of class Tablet (211 - 14283, n=30, last 2 years)
3007 Points ∼18% +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1681 - 1765, n=7)
1732 Points ∼10% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1729 Points ∼10%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1434 Points ∼9% -17%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
715 Points ∼4% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
708 Points ∼4% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MatePad 10.4
3375 Points ∼62% +34%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2818 Points ∼52% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2517 Points ∼46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2161 - 2543, n=7)
2412 Points ∼45% -4%
Average of class Tablet (674 - 4482, n=30, last 2 years)
2217 Points ∼41% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1702 Points ∼31% -32%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
1561 Points ∼29% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 10.4
3483 Points ∼21% +83%
Average of class Tablet (261 - 13682, n=32, last 2 years)
3186 Points ∼19% +67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1906 Points ∼11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1819 - 1914, n=7)
1879 Points ∼11% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1641 Points ∼10% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
930 Points ∼6% -51%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
827 Points ∼5% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (219 - 42751, n=32, last 2 years)
5725 Points ∼13% +220%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
3406 Points ∼8% +90%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1790 Points ∼4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1737 - 1794, n=7)
1777 Points ∼4% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1455 Points ∼3% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
822 Points ∼2% -54%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
726 Points ∼2% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 10.4
3782 Points ∼55% +53%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2963 Points ∼43% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2466 Points ∼36%
Average of class Tablet (781 - 5394, n=32, last 2 years)
2410 Points ∼35% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2146 - 2502, n=7)
2334 Points ∼34% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1716 Points ∼25% -30%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
1608 Points ∼23% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Huawei MatePad 10.4
2837 Points ∼14% +141%
Average of class Tablet (169 - 7098, n=30, last 2 years)
1870 Points ∼9% +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1151 - 1905, n=7)
1276 Points ∼6% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1176 Points ∼6%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1157 Points ∼6% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
639 Points ∼3% -46%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
439 Points ∼2% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Huawei MatePad 10.4
2710 Points ∼23% +165%
Average of class Tablet (139 - 9612, n=31, last 2 years)
1964 Points ∼17% +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (998 - 1074, n=7)
1027 Points ∼9% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1022 Points ∼9%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
990 Points ∼9% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
542 Points ∼5% -47%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
364 Points ∼3% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MatePad 10.4
3391 Points ∼58% +36%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2832 Points ∼48% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2497 Points ∼42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2351 - 2513, n=7)
2456 Points ∼42% -2%
Average of class Tablet (369 - 4201, n=31, last 2 years)
2222 Points ∼38% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1704 Points ∼29% -32%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
1586 Points ∼27% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 10.4
2961 Points ∼30% +147%
Average of class Tablet (167 - 8911, n=32, last 2 years)
2387 Points ∼24% +99%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1197 Points ∼12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1124 - 1197, n=7)
1172 Points ∼12% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1158 Points ∼12% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
646 Points ∼7% -46%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
501 Points ∼5% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (136 - 25707, n=32, last 2 years)
3180 Points ∼12% +205%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
2798 Points ∼11% +168%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1043 Points ∼4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (980 - 1081, n=7)
1032 Points ∼4% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
986 Points ∼4% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
547 Points ∼2% -48%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
418 Points ∼2% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 10.4
3720 Points ∼47% +51%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2966 Points ∼37% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2471 Points ∼31%
Average of class Tablet (443 - 5403, n=32, last 2 years)
2406 Points ∼30% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2164 - 2534, n=7)
2340 Points ∼29% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1755 Points ∼22% -29%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
1621 Points ∼20% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 10.4
2620 Points ∼19% +135%
Average of class Tablet (469 - 6292, n=26, last 2 years)
1878 Points ∼14% +69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1096 - 1167, n=7)
1120 Points ∼8% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1114 Points ∼8%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1110 Points ∼8% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
725 Points ∼5% -35%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
493 Points ∼4% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (400 - 25909, n=26, last 2 years)
2721 Points ∼11% +180%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
2536 Points ∼10% +161%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (963 - 1005, n=7)
978 Points ∼4% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
971 Points ∼4%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
955 Points ∼4% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
612 Points ∼2% -37%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
404 Points ∼2% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad 10.4
2963 Points ∼56% +29%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2567 Points ∼49% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2302 Points ∼44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2124 - 2499, n=7)
2300 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Tablet (533 - 3658, n=26, last 2 years)
2269 Points ∼43% -1%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
2122 Points ∼40% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
2053 Points ∼39% -11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Huawei MatePad 10.4
57 fps ∼2% +73%
Average of class Tablet (9.2 - 120, n=33, last 2 years)
47.8 fps ∼1% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (29 - 51, n=8)
38.9 fps ∼1% +18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
37 fps ∼1% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
33 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
24 fps ∼1% -27%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
21 fps ∼1% -36%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Average of class Tablet (4.4 - 588, n=33, last 2 years)
109 fps ∼1% +211%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
87 fps ∼1% +149%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
38 fps ∼0% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (34 - 36, n=8)
35.1 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
35 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
25 fps ∼0% -29%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
23 fps ∼0% -34%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MatePad 10.4
49 fps ∼13% +172%
Average of class Tablet (4.4 - 120, n=31, last 2 years)
36 fps ∼10% +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (17 - 34, n=8)
25.6 fps ∼7% +42%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
21 fps ∼6% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
18 fps ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13 fps ∼4% -28%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
9.3 fps ∼3% -48%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 345, n=32, last 2 years)
62.7 fps ∼7% +230%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
47 fps ∼5% +147%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
20 fps ∼2% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (19 - 21, n=8)
19.4 fps ∼2% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
19 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13 fps ∼1% -32%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
9.8 fps ∼1% -48%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 10.4
32 fps ∼1% +167%
Average of class Tablet (2.8 - 107, n=32, last 2 years)
25.6 fps ∼1% +113%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (12 - 26, n=8)
19 fps ∼1% +58%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
12 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
12 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
7.7 fps ∼0% -36%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
6 fps ∼0% -50%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.6 - 227, n=32, last 2 years)
42.5 fps ∼1% +227%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
35 fps ∼1% +169%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (13 - 14, n=8)
13.1 fps ∼0% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
13 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
12 fps ∼0% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
8.1 fps ∼0% -38%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
6.4 fps ∼0% -51%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 10.4
19 fps ∼1% +184%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 87, n=31, last 2 years)
17.3 fps ∼0% +158%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (6.4 - 14, n=8)
9.98 fps ∼0% +49%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.4 fps ∼0% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
6.7 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5 fps ∼0% -25%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
3.4 fps ∼0% -49%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 150, n=31, last 2 years)
28 fps ∼0% +289%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
21 fps ∼0% +192%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.4 fps ∼0% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
7.2 fps ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (7 - 7.3, n=8)
7.18 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5.2 fps ∼0% -28%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
3.5 fps ∼0% -51%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 10.4
13 fps ∼8% +183%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 75, n=33, last 2 years)
12 fps ∼8% +161%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4.4 - 9.6, n=8)
6.91 fps ∼4% +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
4.6 fps ∼3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
4.3 fps ∼3% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
3 fps ∼2% -35%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
2 fps ∼1% -57%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.85 - 70, n=33, last 2 years)
11 fps ∼5% +279%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
7.8 fps ∼3% +169%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2.9 fps ∼1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2.6 - 2.9, n=8)
2.79 fps ∼1% -4%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2.6 fps ∼1% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1.8 fps ∼1% -38%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
1.2 fps ∼0% -59%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 10.4
20 fps ∼10% +156%
Average of class Tablet (3.2 - 102, n=33, last 2 years)
18 fps ∼9% +131%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (7.5 - 15, n=8)
11.2 fps ∼5% +44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
7.8 fps ∼4%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.4 fps ∼4% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
4.9 fps ∼2% -37%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
3.5 fps ∼2% -55%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.3 - 191, n=33, last 2 years)
30.1 fps ∼5% +258%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
22 fps ∼4% +162%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
8.4 fps ∼1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (8.2 - 8.6, n=8)
8.4 fps ∼1% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.6 fps ∼1% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5 fps ∼1% -40%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
3.6 fps ∼1% -57%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (75328 - 1037960, n=26, last 2 years)
362924 Points ∼35% +117%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
259370 Points ∼25% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (167471 - 185542, n=8)
177515 Points ∼17% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
167471 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
99193 Points ∼10% -41%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Huawei MatePad 10.4
3543 Points ∼42% +48%
Average of class Tablet (157 - 6164, n=23, last 2 years)
2553 Points ∼30% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2401 Points ∼28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2243 - 2432, n=9)
2345 Points ∼28% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1903 Points ∼23% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1681 Points ∼20% -30%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
1284 Points ∼15% -47%
System
Huawei MatePad 10.4
6541 Points ∼40% +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
4979 Points ∼30%
Average of class Tablet (946 - 10489, n=23, last 2 years)
4891 Points ∼30% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4275 - 5001, n=9)
4853 Points ∼29% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
3827 Points ∼23% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
3517 Points ∼21% -29%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
2658 Points ∼16% -47%
Memory
Huawei MatePad 10.4
4904 Points ∼54% +53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
3209 Points ∼35%
Average of class Tablet (464 - 7215, n=23, last 2 years)
3091 Points ∼34% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (2618 - 3454, n=9)
3062 Points ∼34% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2380 Points ∼26% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
2079 Points ∼23% -35%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
1261 Points ∼14% -61%
Graphics
Huawei MatePad 10.4
4055 Points ∼14% +118%
Average of class Tablet (143 - 12350, n=23, last 2 years)
3773 Points ∼13% +103%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1857 Points ∼6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1773 - 1887, n=9)
1844 Points ∼6% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1550 Points ∼5% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1073 Points ∼4% -42%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
995 Points ∼3% -46%
Web
Huawei MatePad 10.4
1212 Points ∼56% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (1034 - 1228, n=9)
1124 Points ∼52% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
1120 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1016 Points ∼47% -9%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1544, n=23, last 2 years)
951 Points ∼44% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
929 Points ∼43% -17%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
816 Points ∼38% -27%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, ARM Mali-G52 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 Samsung Exynos 7904, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (14 - 183, n=27, last 2 years)
68.4 Points ∼100% +111%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4.303)
47.863 Points ∼70% +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
32.444 Points ∼47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (30.4 - 32.4, n=9)
31.5 Points ∼46% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
25.621 Points ∼37% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samung Browser 9.2)
22.14 Points ∼32% -32%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79)
16.3 Points ∼24% -50%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (11.2 - 403, n=34, last 2 years)
112 Points ∼100% +126%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4.303)
85.137 Points ∼76% +72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
49.524 Points ∼44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (47.8 - 49.7, n=7)
49.2 Points ∼44% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
45.743 Points ∼41% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
43.131 Points ∼39% -13%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79)
26.439 Points ∼24% -47%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Tablet (13 - 221, n=36, last 2 years)
84.2 Points ∼100% +62%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4.303)
83 Points ∼99% +60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
56 Points ∼67% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (51 - 59, n=9)
52.7 Points ∼63% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
52 Points ∼62% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
52 Points ∼62%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79)
37 Points ∼44% -29%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 210, n=27, last 2 years)
66.1 runs/min ∼100% +126%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4.303)
48.3 runs/min ∼73% +65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
29.27 runs/min ∼44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (26.5 - 29.3, n=8)
28.3 runs/min ∼43% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
27.7 runs/min ∼42% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
21.58 runs/min ∼33% -26%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79)
18.4 runs/min ∼28% -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (1712 - 62946, n=35, last 2 years)
19287 Points ∼100% +98%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4.303)
16604 Points ∼86% +71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
9737 Points ∼50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (8893 - 9879, n=9)
9305 Points ∼48% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
8696 Points ∼45% -11%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
8665 Points ∼45% -11%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79)
4817 Points ∼25% -51%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79)
9928.9 ms * ∼100% -121%
Average of class Tablet (464 - 19212, n=36, last 2 years)
5477 ms * ∼55% -22%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
4979.3 ms * ∼50% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4322 - 4650, n=9)
4508 ms * ∼45% -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185)
4498 ms * ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
4054.8 ms * ∼41% +10%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4.303)
2646.3 ms * ∼27% +41%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)Amazon Fire HD 10 2019Huawei MatePad 10.4Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705FSamsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-5%
-3%
10%
-20%
-29%
36%
Sequential Read 256KB
298.03
266.16
-11%
286.03
-4%
295.63
-1%
300.03
1%
240 (25.8 - 452, n=227)
-19%
503 (123 - 1789, n=33, last 2 years)
69%
Sequential Write 256KB
89.89
180.1
100%
97.2
8%
238.93
166%
90.71
1%
97.9 (14.8 - 189, n=227)
9%
236 (53.1 - 732, n=33, last 2 years)
163%
Random Read 4KB
81.96
74.99
-9%
67.76
-17%
64.84
-21%
62.56
-24%
42 (3.59 - 117, n=227)
-49%
95.1 (25.4 - 249, n=33, last 2 years)
16%
Random Write 4KB
83.62
23.28
-72%
81.56
-2%
16.76
-80%
11.37
-86%
20 (0.75 - 89.5, n=227)
-76%
69.1 (4.27 - 262, n=33, last 2 years)
-17%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.42 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-10%
81.42 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
86.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
81.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
71.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=178)
-16%
80.1 (39 - 86.6, n=23, last 2 years)
-6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
70.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
51.96 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-26%
70.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
65.44 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
65.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
52.9 (3.4 - 87.1, n=178)
-24%
61.3 (35.2 - 71.7, n=23, last 2 years)
-12%
PUBG Compare
0510152025303540455055603030303030303030303030303030303030303030302630303030303030303029313030303030303030303030303029303030303030292925303129312931303030303030303030303030303030303030303029312930303030303030303030303030303030302931303030303030303030303030303030303030303030292930303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303029313030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303026303030303030303030293130303030303030303030303030293030303030302929253031293129313030303030303030303030303030303030303030293129303030303030303030303030303030303029313030303030303030303030303030303030303030302929303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030293130303030222526242321252525252525252525242625252524262525242625252525252524262422242524262525252426252524262426252525242625252525242525252525252525252525252525252525222321252524252425252425252525242424252525252525252525242525252425252525242525252525252525242625252426252525232625252525252525252524252525252525252525252525252525303030303030303030303030303030303030303030263030303030303030302931303030303030303030303030302930303030303029292530312931293130303030303030303030303030303030303030302931293030303030303030303030303030303030293130303030303030303030303030303030303030303029293030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302931303030302225262423212525252525252525252426252525242625252426252525252525242624222425242625252524262525242624262525252426252525252425252525252525252525252525252525252223212525242524252524252525252424242525252525252525252425252524252525252425252525252525252426252524262525252326252525252525252525242525252525252525252525252525255660606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060596058606060606060606060606060606060596060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.55.5: Ø29.9 (25-31)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.1.0: Ø24.8 (21-26)
; Dead Trigger 2; 1.6.10: Ø59.9 (56-60)
Hög belastning
 33.8 °C33.6 °C31.1 °C 
 35.4 °C32.4 °C30.1 °C 
 32.7 °C31.6 °C29.9 °C 
Max: 35.4 °C
Medel: 32.3 °C
30.1 °C32.6 °C33.1 °C
28.9 °C31.1 °C32.9 °C
28.2 °C30.9 °C32.1 °C
Max: 33.1 °C
Medel: 31.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  31.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30.5 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.5 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30.5 °C / 87 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.4292523.332.1312624.54022.623.25034.537.86319.923.88014.716.510014.419.712514.931.316017.851.920018.952.225011.759.231513.967.24001370.550010.373.663010.474.480012.474.9100011.177.5125011.277.1160012.775.4200012.373.6250012.673.3315012.769.5400012.775.6500012.773.3630013.572.480001466.31000013.569.21250014.964.2160001655.8SPL24.886N0.669.1median 12.7median 70.5Delta18.639.540.127.633.120.731.32334.833.541.526.833.620.834.92239.118.246.317.861.914.761.415.16513.469.912.273.312.871.511.573.511.675.51277.911.479.611.378.711.978.512.477.212.573.513.175.513.577.313.177.813.973.313.171.81462.213.752.924.888.70.681.3median 13.1median 73.31.57.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)Huawei MatePad 10.4
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Huawei MatePad 10.4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.34 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.18 / 4.92 / 4.95 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 7.21 / 9.32 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
7040 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
6300 mAh
Huawei MatePad 10.4
7250 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
6150 mAh
Power Consumption
19%
7%
11%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
1.18
1.14
3%
1.29
-9%
1.28
-8%
1.66
-41%
Idle Average *
4.92
3.71
25%
4.57
7%
4.5
9%
4.28
13%
Idle Maximum *
4.95
3.74
24%
4.64
6%
4.59
7%
4.44
10%
Load Average *
7.21
5.26
27%
6.01
17%
5.71
21%
7.53
-4%
Load Maximum *
9.32
7.68
18%
8.06
14%
6.99
25%
9.09
2%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
53tim 12min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12tim 37min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12tim 25min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 55min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
7040 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
6300 mAh
Huawei MatePad 10.4
7250 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
6150 mAh
Battery Runtime
19%
28%
4%
1%
Reader / Idle
3192
1691
-47%
2020
-37%
2083
-35%
1500
-53%
H.264
745
1480
99%
1003
35%
919
23%
838
12%
WiFi v1.3
757
950
25%
1190
57%
795
5%
723
-4%
Load
235
228
-3%
366
56%
288
23%
347
48%

För

+ Tunt och robust metallhölje
+ 4 högtalare med Dolby Atmos
+ Gedigen prestanda
+ Barnläge och Android 10
+ DRM Widevine L1
+ LTE, snabbt WLAN, Bluetooth 5.0
+ Smidig att använda
+ Exakt GPS
+ Inget PWM-flimmer
+ Bra batteritid

Emot

- Inte mycket lagring tillgängligt
- Kameran tar bara bra bilder i dagsljus
- Saknar fingeravtrycksläsare
- Medioker spelprestanda
- Långsam laddning med laddare på 7.8 Watt

Omdöme - Väldigt bra prestanda i förhållande till priset

Test av Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE. Recensionsex från nbb.com (notebooksbilliger.de)
Test av Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE. Recensionsex från nbb.com (notebooksbilliger.de)

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Oftast får man kompromissa en del om man vill köpa en billig surfplatta. Men när det kommer till Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE har fördelarna överhanden. Den står sig förstås inte helt jämfört med dyrare modeller, för denna Android-platta på 10.4 tum saknar funktioner som fingeravtrycksläsare, stöd för penna eller Samsung DeX. Dessutom är kameran och spelprestandan medioker och den tar nästan 4.5 timmar att ladda med den inkluderade laddaren.

Men trots ett pris på runt 2.900 kronor har tunna och robusta Galaxy Tab A7 LTE mycket att ge. De fyra högtalarna med Dolby Atmos ger en trevlig ljudupplevelse, batteriet håller länge även vid konstant bruk och kraften från dess åttakärniga Snapdragon 662 SoC räcker lätt till för multimediauppgifter. Den kontrastrika WUXGA+ skärmen övertygar också, även om betraktningsvinklarna inte riktigt når samma nivå som dyrare plattor och färgåtergivningen inte är lika bra som på en OLED-panel.

Framgångsrik prestanda: Galaxy Tab A7 LTE är en av de bästa Android-surfplattorna som vi testat i den här priskategorin i år.

Den som letar efter en billig och lätt platta för webbsurfande, Netflix och YouTube kommer klara sig bra med Galaxy Tab A7 LTE. Om du inte behöver LTE-stöd finns en i övrigt likadan WiFi-version att köpa för 2.300 kronor som vi också kan rekommendera.

Andra alternativ: Även om Amazon Fire HD 2019 är ännu billigare är den inte riktigt lika snabb och inte i närheten lika välbyggd. Den är dessutom helt inriktad mot Amazons värld. Om din budget klarar av en aning mer än 3.000 kronor är Huawei MatePad 10.4 också intressant. Den är betydligt snabbare än Samsungs platta men kommer utan Googles tjänster och har heller inte Widevine L1-certifiering. Nuförtiden är priset på Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e nära samma nivå som Galaxy Tab A7 LTE, men den förstnämnda har en AMOLED-skärm.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) - 11/23/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Design
80 / 98 → 82%
Tangentbord
69 / 80 → 87%
Mus
89%
Anslutningar
45 / 70 → 64%
Vikt
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Batteri
89%
Skärm
82%
Spelprestanda
13 / 78 → 17%
Programprestanda
58 / 92 → 63%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
81 / 91 → 89%
Camera
46 / 85 → 54%
Medel
71%
82%
Tablet - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Mark Riege
Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 241 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE - En av de bästa surfplattorna du kan få tag på för under 3.000 kronor (Sammanfattning)
Manuel Masiero, 2020-11-30 (Update: 2020-11-30)