Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo smartphone (sammanfattning)

Nygammal. Galaxy S5 Neo från Samsung är en ny version av det äldre flaggskeppet Galaxy S5. Är den ett prisvärt alternativ till Galaxy S6?
Andreas Osthoff, Stefanie Voigt,
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo (Galaxy S Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Minne
2048 MB 
Skärm
5.1 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar, Kapacitiv, 10 beröringspunkter, Super AMOLED, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.1 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3,5 mm kombo, Kortläsare: microSD (upp till 128 GB), Sensorer: Positionssensor, accelerometer, ljussensor, gyroskop, närhetssensor, magnetometer, Wi-Fi Direct, ANT+, NFC, USB-OTG, GPS, GLOANSS, SAR kropp: 0.583 W/kg huvud-SAR: 0.457 W/kg, FM-radio
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (800, 850, 900, 1800, 2100, 2600 MHz)
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.1 x 142 x 72.5
Batteri
11 Wh Litiumjon, 2800 mAh, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 15 tim
Operativsystem
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Webbkamera: 5 MP, Bak: 16 MP (autofocus, LED-blixt) video: FHD @30 fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Mono, Tangentbord: virtuellt, modular PSU (7.75 Watts), USB cable, headset, quick-start guide, Galaxy Apps, S Health, S Planner, S Voice, Smart Manager, Microsoft OneNote, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
145 g, Strömförsörjning: 53 g
Pris
400 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

151.8 mm 74.9 mm 9.85 mm 178 g148 mm 75 mm 10.9 mm 169 g144.9 mm 71.8 mm 6.4 mm 147 g143.4 mm 70.5 mm 6.8 mm 138 g142 mm 72.5 mm 8.1 mm 145 g142 mm 72.5 mm 8.1 mm 145 g
Galaxy S5 Neo: Complete
Galaxy S5 Neo: Complete
Galaxy S5 Neo: Crossing
Galaxy S5 Neo: Crossing
Galaxy S5 Neo: Turning point
Galaxy S5 Neo: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Complete
Garmin Edge 500: Complete
Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
Garmin Edge 500: Turning Point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning Point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
361
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 361 cd/m² Medel: 341 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 334 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.84 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.91 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
Gamma: 2.01
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
-28%
4%
-15%
-1%
-4%
Brightness middle
334
358
7%
335
0%
453
36%
451
35%
641
92%
Brightness
341
364
7%
345
1%
439
29%
446
31%
620
82%
Brightness Distribution
91
82
-10%
89
-2%
91
0%
90
-1%
93
2%
Black Level *
0.28
0.3
0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.84
5.28
-86%
2.51
12%
4.7
-65%
3.84
-35%
5.37
-89%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.91
4.65
-60%
2.59
11%
5.03
-73%
3.97
-36%
6.01
-107%
Gamma
2.01 109%
2.48 89%
2.43 91%
2.27 97%
2.46 89%
2.44 90%
CCT
6432 101%
7690 85%
6424 101%
7439 87%
7283 89%
7806 83%
Contrast
1618
1503
1603
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
72.04
58.07
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90.14

* ... smaller is better

AnTuTu v5 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
37854 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy S6
60804 Points ∼61% +61%
Huawei P8
45927 Points ∼46% +21%
OnePlus 2
58535 Points ∼59% +55%
Motorola Moto X Play
29699 Points ∼30% -22%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3330 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy S5
2885 Points ∼4% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S6
5073 Points ∼6% +52%
Huawei P8
2955 Points ∼4% -11%
OnePlus 2
4154 Points ∼5% +25%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
721 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy S5
941 Points ∼19% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S6
1146 Points ∼24% +59%
Huawei P8
698 Points ∼14% -3%
OnePlus 2
1066 Points ∼22% +48%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8
3458 Points ∼5%
OnePlus 2
4804 Points ∼8%
Motorola Moto X Play
2558 Points ∼4%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8
864 Points ∼18%
OnePlus 2
1140 Points ∼23%
Motorola Moto X Play
717 Points ∼15%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
1350 Points ∼17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
1777 Points ∼19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
1660 Points ∼20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
1267 Points ∼22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
2686 Points ∼9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
2151 Points ∼16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
1503 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy S6
1320 Points ∼25% -12%
OnePlus 2
1517 Points ∼29% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
169 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S6
1152 Points ∼14% +582%
OnePlus 2
846 Points ∼10% +401%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
211 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S6
1186 Points ∼6% +462%
OnePlus 2
938 Points ∼5% +345%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
1453 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy S6
1553 Points ∼31% +7%
OnePlus 2
1414 Points ∼28% -3%
Motorola Moto X Play
974 Points ∼19% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
272 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S6
1492 Points ∼12% +449%
OnePlus 2
1854 Points ∼15% +582%
Motorola Moto X Play
178 Points ∼1% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
332 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S6
1505 Points ∼16% +353%
OnePlus 2
1734 Points ∼18% +422%
Motorola Moto X Play
218 Points ∼2% -34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
10424 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy S5
15198 Points ∼18% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S6
18649 Points ∼22% +79%
Huawei P8
10494 Points ∼12% +1%
OnePlus 2
10985 Points ∼13% +5%
Motorola Moto X Play
6839 Points ∼8% -34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
7536 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S5
19530 Points ∼4% +159%
Samsung Galaxy S6
23193 Points ∼4% +208%
Huawei P8
8743 Points ∼2% +16%
OnePlus 2
31858 Points ∼6% +323%
Motorola Moto X Play
7796 Points ∼1% +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
8030 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S5
18367 Points ∼8% +129%
Samsung Galaxy S6
22002 Points ∼9% +174%
Huawei P8
9080 Points ∼4% +13%
OnePlus 2
22400 Points ∼9% +179%
Motorola Moto X Play
7561 Points ∼3% -6%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
10270 Points ∼12%
Huawei P8
9404 Points ∼11% -8%
Motorola Moto X Play
6841 Points ∼8% -33%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4449 Points ∼1%
Huawei P8
6064 Points ∼1% +36%
Motorola Moto X Play
5082 Points ∼1% +14%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
5090 Points ∼2%
Huawei P8
6584 Points ∼3% +29%
Motorola Moto X Play
5390 Points ∼2% +6%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
10466 Points ∼7%
Huawei P8
9337 Points ∼6% -11%
Motorola Moto X Play
6799 Points ∼4% -35%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
8304 Points ∼1%
Huawei P8
10515 Points ∼1% +27%
Motorola Moto X Play
10194 Points ∼1% +23%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
8704 Points ∼1%
Huawei P8
10228 Points ∼1% +18%
Motorola Moto X Play
9176 Points ∼1% +5%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4.8 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S5
11.8 fps ∼2% +146%
Samsung Galaxy S6
22 fps ∼4% +358%
Huawei P8
5.5 fps ∼1% +15%
OnePlus 2
23 fps ∼4% +379%
Motorola Moto X Play
5.8 fps ∼1% +21%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4.8 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S5
11.7 fps ∼3% +144%
Samsung Galaxy S6
16 fps ∼4% +233%
Huawei P8
5.8 fps ∼2% +21%
OnePlus 2
23 fps ∼6% +379%
Motorola Moto X Play
6.2 fps ∼2% +29%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3.1 fps ∼0%
OnePlus 2
19 fps ∼0% +513%
Motorola Moto X Play
4.2 fps ∼0% +35%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3.4 fps ∼0%
OnePlus 2
19 fps ∼1% +459%
Motorola Moto X Play
4.4 fps ∼0% +29%
PCMark for Android
Computer Vision score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X Play
1756 Points ∼8%
Storage score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X Play
3900 Points ∼12%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X Play
3293 Points ∼26%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4134 Points ∼21%
Huawei P8
4479 Points ∼23% +8%
OnePlus 2
4282 Points ∼22% +4%
Motorola Moto X Play
3589 Points ∼18% -13%
Smartbench 2012
Gaming Index (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3500 points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S5
4432 points ∼96% +27%
Huawei P8
4340 points ∼94% +24%
OnePlus 2
4325 points ∼94% +24%
Motorola Moto X Play
2523 points ∼55% -28%
Productivity Index (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
6719 points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy S5
9054 points ∼48% +35%
Huawei P8
5433 points ∼29% -19%
OnePlus 2
10472 points ∼56% +56%
Motorola Moto X Play
3820 points ∼20% -43%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
733 Points ∼36%
Huawei P8
694 Points ∼34% -5%
OnePlus 2
923 Points ∼45% +26%
Motorola Moto X Play
710 Points ∼35% -3%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
488 Points ∼2%
Huawei P8
882 Points ∼3% +81%
OnePlus 2
2631 Points ∼9% +439%
Motorola Moto X Play
785 Points ∼3% +61%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
569 Points ∼7%
Huawei P8
1216 Points ∼14% +114%
OnePlus 2
1297 Points ∼15% +128%
Motorola Moto X Play
595 Points ∼7% +5%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
2095 Points ∼13%
Huawei P8
1860 Points ∼11% -11%
OnePlus 2
2536 Points ∼15% +21%
Motorola Moto X Play
1177 Points ∼7% -44%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
808 Points ∼10%
Huawei P8
1085 Points ∼13% +34%
OnePlus 2
1681 Points ∼20% +108%
Motorola Moto X Play
701 Points ∼8% -13%
Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
247.675 MFLOPS ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy S5
678 MFLOPS ∼23% +174%
Huawei P8
272.482 MFLOPS ∼9% +10%
OnePlus 2
818.77 MFLOPS ∼28% +231%
Motorola Moto X Play
275 MFLOPS ∼9% +11%
Single Thread (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
95.591 MFLOPS ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy S5
355 MFLOPS ∼35% +271%
Huawei P8
122.028 MFLOPS ∼12% +28%
OnePlus 2
630.326 MFLOPS ∼62% +559%
Motorola Moto X Play
134 MFLOPS ∼13% +40%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S6 Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Huawei P8 HiSilicon Kirin 930, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto X Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
735 ms * ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
408.7 ms * ∼4% +44%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
546 ms * ∼6% +26%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1163.6 ms * ∼13% -58%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
739.6 ms * ∼8% -1%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1235 ms * ∼14% -68%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3627 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3875 Points ∼7% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8518 Points ∼16% +135%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4084 Points ∼8% +13%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6955 Points ∼13% +92%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3764 Points ∼7% +4%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11603.4 ms * ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6302 ms * ∼11% +46%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11807.9 ms * ∼20% -2%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6585.3 ms * ∼11% +43%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11694 ms * ∼20% -1%
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3765 Points ∼19%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4419 Points ∼23% +17%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7650 Points ∼39% +103%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3917 Points ∼20% +4%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
68 Points ∼8%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
70 Points ∼9% +3%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
80 Points ∼10% +18%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
56 Points ∼7% -18%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
23.097 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
49.193 Points ∼14% +113%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.286 Points ∼13% +92%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
24.51 Points ∼7% +6%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11.07 MB/s ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1 MB/s ∼0% -91%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
19.9 MB/s ∼7% +80%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10.04 MB/s ∼4% -9%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13.94 MB/s ∼5% +26%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
16 MB/s ∼6% +45%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22.57 MB/s ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 MB/s ∼3% -62%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
80 MB/s ∼30% +254%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22.46 MB/s ∼8% 0%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21.87 MB/s ∼8% -3%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
16 MB/s ∼6% -29%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
57.92 MB/s ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
19.05 MB/s ∼3% -67%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
138.9 MB/s ∼19% +140%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
39.58 MB/s ∼5% -32%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
125.51 MB/s ∼17% +117%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
75 MB/s ∼10% +29%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
215.86 MB/s ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
83.53 MB/s ∼5% -61%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
319 MB/s ∼18% +48%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
139.95 MB/s ∼8% -35%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
234.21 MB/s ∼13% +9%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
139 MB/s ∼8% -36%
Hög belastning
 33 °C33 °C31.4 °C 
 33.5 °C32.7 °C31.3 °C 
 32.4 °C31.2 °C30.2 °C 
Max: 33.5 °C
Medel: 32.1 °C
31.3 °C34 °C32.5 °C
30.8 °C31 °C30.5 °C
29.7 °C30.2 °C30.1 °C
Max: 34 °C
Medel: 31.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  28.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.08 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.68 / 2.2 / 2.33 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.09 / 5.92 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption
46%
32%
6%
14%
11%
Idle Minimum *
1.68
0.3
82%
0.4
76%
0.7
58%
0.6
64%
0.9
46%
Idle Average *
2.2
0.5
77%
0.6
73%
2
9%
1.7
23%
1.6
27%
Idle Maximum *
2.33
1.1
53%
1.2
48%
2.1
10%
1.8
23%
1.8
23%
Load Average *
4.09
3.1
24%
5
-22%
4.9
-20%
5.7
-39%
4.9
-20%
Load Maximum *
5.92
6.2
-5%
6.8
-15%
7.4
-25%
6
-1%
7.2
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
26tim 55min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 38)
9tim 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12tim 53min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
6tim 42min
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
-20%
-21%
-36%
-29%
-17%
Reader / Idle
1615
1695
5%
1300
-20%
826
-49%
1393
-14%
1145
-29%
H.264
773
556
-28%
581
-25%
580
-25%
742
-4%
WiFi v1.3
546
475
-13%
434
-21%
356
-35%
674
23%
Load
402
253
-37%
278
-31%
215
-47%
229
-43%
174
-57%
WiFi
613
575

För

+ Robust hölje
+ Damm- och vattenskyddad
+ Utmärkt skärm
+ Bra kamera
+ Utbytbart batteri
+ minneskortplats
+ Bra batteritid
+ Låga temperaturer

Emot

- Sämre prestanda än föregångaren
- Strypning under längre belastning
- Begränsade videoalternativ
- Ingen fingeravtrycksläsare
In review: Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo är återvinning på hög nivå. Det tidigare flaggskeppet har förbättrats i vissa avseenden, men prestandan är lägre och vissa funktioner har plockats bort

Positivt med Galaxy S5 Neo är ett robust hölje, en stor skärm, bra mjukvara och lång batteritid. Mobilen är fortfarande vattentät, men använder inte irriterande flikar längre. Samsung har också förbättrat kamerorna, även om videoalternativen är begränsade. Till skillnad från det nuvarande flaggskeppet från S6-serien kan du byta ut batteriet och utöka lagringen med microSD-kort.

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo är en sofistikerad smartphone med bra grundfunktioner. Om du är nöjd med plasthöljet och inte behöver marknadens snabbaste smartphone, kan S5 Neo leverera mycket för pengarna.

Vi kunde inte hitta några allvarliga problem. Det är ganska synd att 3D-prestandan är betydligt sämre än föregångaren och att vissa andra funktioner fått stryka på foten. Vi skulle åtminstone ha uppskattat fingeravtrycksläsaren. 

För priset är S5 Neo ett intressant alternativ. S5 Neo kan i skrivande stund hittas för ca 3 500 kr, medan gamla Galaxy S5 kostar något mer. Om du uppskattar nyheterna och kan avvara funktionerna som bantats bort är Galaxy S5 Neo ett bra val.

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo - 12/04/2015 v4(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Design
87%
Tangentbord
69 / 75 → 92%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
46 / 60 → 77%
Vikt
93%
Batteri
95%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
57 / 63 → 90%
Programprestanda
38 / 70 → 54%
Temperatur
92%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
63 / 91 → 69%
Camera
79%
Medel
77%
87%
Smartphone - Vägt medel
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo smartphone (sammanfattning)
Andreas Osthoff, 2016-01- 5 (Update: 2016-01- 5)
Andreas Osthoff
Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Notebooks