Notebookcheck

Test: Nokia X20 - 5G och lång garanti (Sammanfattning)

Hållbar och älskvärd? Nokia X20 visar vart den traditionella finska mobiltillverkaren är på väg: Nya telefonnamn, större hållbarhet och mer fokus på konsumenten. Med 5G, extra lång garanti och komposterbara tillbehör kan detta lyckas. Vi tar en närmare titt i vårt test.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Nokia X20
, , , , , ,
sökrelation
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Nokia X20 (X Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / 55
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Minne
8192 MB 
Skärm
6.67 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 395 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 512GB, delat, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerationssensor, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (1/​2/​3/​4/​5/​7/​8/​12/​20/​28/​38/​39/​40/​41/​66), 5G (n1/​2/​3/​5/​7/​28/​38/​41/​66/​78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.1 x 168.9 x 79.7
Batteri
4470 mAh Litiumpolymer, 18 Watt snabbladdning
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix Fasjämförande AF, LED-blixt, Video @1080p/​60fps (Kamera 1); 5.0MP, Vidvinkel (Kamera 2); 2.0MP, Macro (Kamera 3); 2.0MP, Skärpedjup (Kamera 4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix Video @1080p/​30fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Komposterbart hölje, 36 Månader Garanti, FM-radio; SAR: 0.51 W/kg (Huvud), 1,29 W/kg (Kropp), fanless
Vikt
220 g
Pris
399 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Rating Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price from
81 %7
05/2021
Nokia X20
SD 480, Adreno 619
220 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
83 %7
08/2020
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
SD 730G, Adreno 618
204 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
84 %7
09/2020
Google Pixel 4a
SD 730G, Adreno 618
143 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash5.80"2340x1080
83 %7
04/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080

Storleksjämförelse

168.9 mm 79.7 mm 9.1 mm 220 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.67 mm 204 g144 mm 69.4 mm 8.2 mm 143 g
Cross Platform Disk Test
Sequential write
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
40.8 (34.7min, 35.008P1 - 52.4max) MB/s ∼100% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (29.3 - 42.6, n=24, last 2 years)
36.6 MB/s ∼90% +6%
Nokia X20
  (Angelbird V60)
34.4 (19.9min, 26.743P1 - 40.8max) MB/s ∼84%
Sequential read
Nokia X20
  (Angelbird V60)
76.1 (15.3min, 44.098P1 - 86.7max) MB/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
74.7 (45.4min, 50.256P1 - 80.4max) MB/s ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35.4 - 86.8, n=24, last 2 years)
74.6 MB/s ∼98% -2%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075808540.240.13240.236.637.540.834.433.629.637.534.633.635.636.433.731.335.835.735.433.431.832.233.319.938.633.927.435.337.134.332.135.134.335.234.533.738.733.134.929.734.237.336.435.235.636.536.333.135.336.932.830.528.635.13330.633.533.235.535.134.833.936.833.532.133.54032.834.733.23829.432.533.236.23632.33429.534.935.535.13634.935.431.639.531.73734.336.435.636.531.434.938.634.634.934.139.634.734.233.326.536.637.235.433.833.136.735.634.134.934.329.235.528.337.23628373434.833.338.233.635.140.240.13240.236.637.540.834.433.629.637.534.633.635.636.433.731.335.835.735.433.431.832.233.319.938.633.927.435.337.134.332.135.134.335.234.533.738.733.134.929.734.237.336.435.235.636.536.333.135.336.932.830.528.635.13330.633.533.235.535.134.833.936.833.532.133.54032.834.733.23829.432.533.236.23632.33429.534.935.535.13634.935.431.639.531.73734.336.435.636.531.434.938.634.634.934.139.634.734.233.326.536.637.235.433.833.136.735.634.134.934.329.235.528.337.23628373434.833.338.233.635.115.378.780.179.879.878.978.679.378.779.978.173.286.779.178.580.377.778.879.778.679.978.578.778.779.778.979.678.876.680.978.978.57878.97975.878.778.279.374.183.978.381.177.480.679.878.879.778.579.380.479.278.678.878.179.380.578.279.280.976.978.474.476.781.779.570.977.279.674.377.677.977.682.278.177.377.982.377.58077.877.777.678.377.879.980.378.380.880.379.278.479.680.579.175.280.281.171.474.279.775.379.577.782.279.978.779.577.979.278.679.879.977.478.261.958.751.159.857.749.559.358.742.175.758.458.459.2Tooltip
; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø34.4 (19.9-40.8)
; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø76.1 (15.3-86.7)
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 4a
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
620 (560min - 703max) MBit/s ∼100% +179%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
324 (310min - 330max) MBit/s ∼52% +46%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
282 (275min - 287max) MBit/s ∼45% +27%
Nokia X20
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
222 (126min - 326max) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 4a
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
668 (592min - 685max) MBit/s ∼100% +113%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
341 (334min - 349max) MBit/s ∼51% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
331 (322min - 337max) MBit/s ∼50% +6%
Nokia X20
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
313 (190min - 343max) MBit/s ∼47%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340300334331328328330334329329332331330326330331333319343330330329331327331332328194190190231300334331328328330334329329332331330326330331333319343330330329331327331332328194190190231136150126241320264182187231174157146138266321265188176216184157138153222324326317320323316Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø312 (190-343)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø222 (126-326)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera
click to load images
ColorChecker
15.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia X20: 9.75 ∆E min: 2.82 - max: 16.5 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
39 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
62.9 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
34 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
65.8 ∆E
64.9 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
77 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
87 ∆E
70.4 ∆E
52.2 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia X20: 46.5 ∆E min: 14.36 - max: 87.04 ∆E
594
cd/m²
584
cd/m²
598
cd/m²
619
cd/m²
646
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
654
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 654 cd/m² Medel: 616.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.19 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 646 cd/m²
Kontrast: 923:1 (Svärta: 0.7 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.71 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
98.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.122
Nokia X20
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Google Pixel 4a
OLED, 2340x1080, 5.80
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Response Times
67%
80%
90%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43 (23, 20)
10 (5, 5)
77%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
80%
3.2 (1.6, 1.6)
93%
Response Time Black / White *
18 (5, 13)
8 (3, 5)
56%
3.6 (2, 1.6)
80%
2.4 (1.2, 1.2)
87%
PWM Frequency
176.1
255.1 (99)
250 (100)
Screen
41%
46%
32%
Brightness middle
646
605
-6%
705
9%
744
15%
Brightness
617
608
-1%
707
15%
749
21%
Brightness Distribution
89
95
7%
96
8%
98
10%
Black Level *
0.7
Contrast
923
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.71
0.84
85%
0.9
84%
2.2
61%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.9
1.8
80%
1.9
79%
7
21%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.2
1.3
79%
1.3
79%
2.1
66%
Gamma
2.122 104%
2.211 100%
2.26 97%
2.06 107%
CCT
8256 79%
6310 103%
6576 99%
6516 100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
54% / 47%
63% / 54%
61% / 47%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9726 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
510 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
547 Points ∼86% +7%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
549 Points ∼86% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
636 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
510 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=217, last 2 years)
559 Points ∼88% +10%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1663 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼88% +2%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1646 Points ∼86% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1878 Points ∼98% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
1663 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=217, last 2 years)
1923 Points ∼100% +16%
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
6380 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7628 Points ∼80% +20%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8683 Points ∼91% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9573 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
6380 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=265, last 2 years)
7803 Points ∼82% +22%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39491 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
34678 Points ∼88%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=217, last 2 years)
39378 Points ∼100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53194 Points ∼94%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53548 Points ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=217, last 2 years)
56697 Points ∼100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
20767 Points ∼90%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15527 Points ∼68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=217, last 2 years)
22969 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3461 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼92% +4%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3543 Points ∼91% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3902 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
3461 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=258, last 2 years)
3323 Points ∼85% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3647 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3610 Points ∼89% -1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3629 Points ∼89% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4076 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
3647 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=258, last 2 years)
3904 Points ∼96% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2938 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3294 Points ∼97% +12%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3273 Points ∼96% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3394 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
2938 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=258, last 2 years)
2719 Points ∼80% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3639 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼89% -1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points ∼90% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4040 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
3639 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=270, last 2 years)
3809 Points ∼94% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3842 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3751 Points ∼78% -2%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3750 Points ∼78% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4239 Points ∼88% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
3842 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=270, last 2 years)
4799 Points ∼100% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3070 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3134 Points ∼90% +2%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼96% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3469 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
3070 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=268, last 2 years)
2844 Points ∼82% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2419 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2459 Points ∼89% +2%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2468 Points ∼90% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2750 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
2419 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=256, last 2 years)
2605 Points ∼95% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2289 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2298 Points ∼83% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2310 Points ∼83% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2603 Points ∼94% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
2289 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=256, last 2 years)
2771 Points ∼100% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3017 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3257 Points ∼95% +8%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3247 Points ∼95% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3428 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
3017 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=256, last 2 years)
2764 Points ∼81% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2536 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2577 Points ∼83% +2%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2615 Points ∼84% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2927 Points ∼95% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
2536 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=268, last 2 years)
3095 Points ∼100% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2440 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2466 Points ∼72% +1%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2467 Points ∼72% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2802 Points ∼81% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
2440 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=268, last 2 years)
3443 Points ∼100% +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2941 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3058 Points ∼88% +4%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3309 Points ∼95% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3466 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
2941 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=268, last 2 years)
2900 Points ∼84% -1%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
980 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1103 Points ∼40% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
980 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=76, last 2 years)
2792 Points ∼100% +185%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
974 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1097 Points ∼36% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
974 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=73, last 2 years)
3045 Points ∼100% +213%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
99.6 (973min - 977max) % ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
99.7 (1097min - 1100max) % ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
99.6 % ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (26.6 - 99.8, n=69, last 2 years)
88.7 % ∼89% -11%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
16 fps ∼74%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼79% +6%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼79% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps ∼84% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
16 fps ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=271, last 2 years)
21.5 fps ∼100% +34%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
18 fps ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼73% 0%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼73% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps ∼81% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
18 fps ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=271, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼100% +38%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
9.9 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼77% +11%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼77% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps ∼77% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
9.9 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=272, last 2 years)
14.3 fps ∼100% +44%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
6.5 fps ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps ∼68% +3%
Google Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.6 fps ∼67% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.6 fps ∼77% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
6.5 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=271, last 2 years)
9.81 fps ∼100% +51%
Nokia X20Xiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteGoogle Pixel 4aSamsung Galaxy A52 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-21%
-4%
31%
-4%
-6%
Sequential Read 256KB
489.3
501.29
2%
502.06
3%
926.67
89%
772 (427 - 999, n=81)
58%
729 (41.9 - 2037, n=277, last 2 years)
49%
Sequential Write 256KB
462.7
213.22
-54%
246.79
-47%
484.62
5%
256 (182 - 511, n=81)
-45%
316 (11.9 - 1321, n=277, last 2 years)
-32%
Random Read 4KB
165.4
134.57
-19%
162.89
-2%
176.05
6%
145 (92.6 - 239, n=81)
-12%
130 (13.5 - 325, n=277, last 2 years)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
144.6
125.75
-13%
187.39
30%
179.23
24%
118 (18.2 - 290, n=81)
-18%
114 (4.97 - 330, n=277, last 2 years)
-21%
Hög belastning
 44 °C42 °C41.1 °C 
 44.1 °C41.9 °C42.8 °C 
 43 °C41.6 °C41.9 °C 
Max: 44.1 °C
Medel: 42.5 °C
35.9 °C40.7 °C43.9 °C
39.2 °C41 °C43.8 °C
39.2 °C41.2 °C43.7 °C
Max: 43.9 °C
Medel: 36.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  39.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.635.2253535.73124.821.24024.922.55028.525.76327288015.717.410016.521.612515.722.616014.437.72009.141.32509.6463157.549.440010.655.650012.358.263018.760.880017.665100015.772.7125011.574.2160010.875.820009.974.425001372.1315016.468.1400015.461.750001761.3630018.266.1800020.2741000020.475.21250017.361.81600017.845SPL28.383.4N0.952.2median 15.7median 61.7Delta2.813.139.642.434.734.424.726.623.521.642.433.528.425.523.925.920.425.115.331.62049.814.64813.153.61461.11160.310.363.11163.710.267.210.372.210.874.610.977.211.680.212.278.912.277.512.58113.477.513.177.11574.213.873.714.166.91659.424.7890.673.6median 13.1median 67.2211.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia X20Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia X20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Nokia X20
4470 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
Google Pixel 4a
3140 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
879
710
-19%
1095
25%
669
-24%
895 (425 - 2000, n=285, last 2 years)
2%
Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14tim 39min

För

+ Lång garanti
+ Flexibla kameror
+ Ingen PWM
+ Ren Android 11
+ 5G
+ Bra batteritid

Emot

- Skärmen har låg kontrast ...
- ... och dålig färgåtergivning
- suddig vidvinkelskamera
- Tung och ganska bred

Omdöme - Bra mobil med hållbara egenskaper

Recension av Nokia X20. Recensionsex från Nokia Germany.
Recension av Nokia X20. Recensionsex från Nokia Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Tittar vi på chippets modellnummer går det att ana att saker inte är så bra: Snapdragon 4 var trots allt tidigare tänkt för instegsenheter. Men nya Snapdragon 480 5G gör ett nästan lika bra jobb som förra årets dyrare mittenskikts-chips. Således ligger Nokias för tillfället dyraste telefon i linje med äldre enheter, men det lär snart komma betydligt snabbare enheter till samma pris. Valet av SoC är alltså inte särskilt framsynt.

Men den som letar efter en mittenskikts-enhet med 5G, en skaplig kamera, ren Android, lång garanti och en skärm utan PWM-flimmer kommer ha hittat rätt här.

Däremot passar den mindre bra om man vill ha en lätt och smidig telefon. Nokias X20 har helt enkelt för mycket skärmyta och är ganska tung. IPS-skärmen har låg kontrast och färgerna är inte särskilt exakta, så fans av OLED-skärmar får också leta någon annanstans.

Nokia X20 är en mittenskiktstelefon med lång garanti, bra batteritid och stöd för 5G.

Det är lovvärt att Nokia försöker bli mer hållbara. Ett skyddshölje som är gjort av komposterbart material istället för en laddare kanske inte faller alla i smaken, men det visar åtminstone att man inte alltid måste använda plast som är dålig för miljön. För att skydda sig mot anklagelser om att försöka tjäna extra pengar donerar Nokia också alla pengar de tjänar på att sälja laddare. Man försöker åtminstone att tänka på enheternas miljöpåverkan, och bara det är ett steg i rätt riktning.

Nokia X20 - 05/04/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design
85%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
52 / 70 → 74%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
83%
Spelprestanda
30 / 64 → 47%
Programprestanda
67 / 86 → 78%
Temperatur
87%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
64 / 90 → 71%
Camera
64%
Medel
75%
81%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 182662 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Nokia X20 - 5G och lång garanti (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2021-05-10 (Update: 2021-05-10)