Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Nokia X20 - 5G och lång garanti (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Rating Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.6 % | 7 | 05/2021 | Nokia X20 SD 480, Adreno 619 | 220 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 82.9 % | 7 | 08/2020 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 204 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.47" | 2340x1080 | |
| 83.6 % | 7 | 09/2020 | Google Pixel 4a SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 143 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 5.80" | 2340x1080 | |
| 83 % | 7 | 04/2021 | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619 | 189 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 |
| Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT) | |
| SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (11.4 - 49.7, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia X20 (Angelbird V60) | |
| SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB | |
| Average of class Smartphone (42.6 - 1269, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia X20 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Google Pixel 4a | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | |
| Nokia X20 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Google Pixel 4a | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | |
| Nokia X20 | |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 646 cd/m²
Kontrast: 923:1 (Svärta: 0.7 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.71 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.122
| Nokia X20 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47 | Google Pixel 4a OLED, 2340x1080, 5.80 | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 67% | 80% | 90% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43 ? | 10 ? 77% | 8.8 ? 80% | 3.2 ? 93% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 18 ? | 8 ? 56% | 3.6 ? 80% | 2.4 ? 87% |
| PWM Frequency | 176.1 | 255.1 ? | 250 ? | |
| Screen | 41% | 46% | 32% | |
| Brightness middle | 646 | 605 -6% | 705 9% | 744 15% |
| Brightness | 617 | 608 -1% | 707 15% | 749 21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 95 7% | 96 8% | 98 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.7 | |||
| Contrast | 923 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.71 | 0.84 85% | 0.9 84% | 2.2 61% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.9 | 1.8 80% | 1.9 79% | 7 21% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 1.3 79% | 1.3 79% | 2.1 66% |
| Gamma | 2.122 104% | 2.211 100% | 2.26 97% | 2.06 107% |
| CCT | 8256 79% | 6310 103% | 6576 99% | 6516 100% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 54% /
47% | 63% /
54% | 61% /
47% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia X20 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
| Google Pixel 4a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (6380 - 7713, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia X20 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
| Google Pixel 4a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (16 - 31, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia X20 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
| Google Pixel 4a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (17 - 19, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia X20 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
| Google Pixel 4a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (9.9 - 19, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 105, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia X20 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
| Google Pixel 4a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (6.4 - 6.7, n=9) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia X20 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | Google Pixel 4a | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -21% | -4% | 31% | 1% | 121% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 489.3 | 501 2% | 502 3% | 927 89% | 760 ? 55% | 1505 ? 208% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 462.7 | 213.2 -54% | 246.8 -47% | 484.6 5% | 297 ? -36% | 1112 ? 140% |
| Random Read 4KB | 165.4 | 134.6 -19% | 162.9 -2% | 176.1 6% | 152.9 ? -8% | 247 ? 49% |
| Random Write 4KB | 144.6 | 125.8 -13% | 187.4 30% | 179.2 24% | 131.6 ? -9% | 271 ? 87% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Nokia X20 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Nokia X20 4470 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh | Google Pixel 4a 3140 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 879 | 710 -19% | 1095 25% | 669 -24% | 912 ? 4% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Bra mobil med hållbara egenskaper
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Tittar vi på chippets modellnummer går det att ana att saker inte är så bra: Snapdragon 4 var trots allt tidigare tänkt för instegsenheter. Men nya Snapdragon 480 5G gör ett nästan lika bra jobb som förra årets dyrare mittenskikts-chips. Således ligger Nokias för tillfället dyraste telefon i linje med äldre enheter, men det lär snart komma betydligt snabbare enheter till samma pris. Valet av SoC är alltså inte särskilt framsynt.
Men den som letar efter en mittenskikts-enhet med 5G, en skaplig kamera, ren Android, lång garanti och en skärm utan PWM-flimmer kommer ha hittat rätt här.
Däremot passar den mindre bra om man vill ha en lätt och smidig telefon. Nokias X20 har helt enkelt för mycket skärmyta och är ganska tung. IPS-skärmen har låg kontrast och färgerna är inte särskilt exakta, så fans av OLED-skärmar får också leta någon annanstans.
Nokia X20 är en mittenskiktstelefon med lång garanti, bra batteritid och stöd för 5G.
Det är lovvärt att Nokia försöker bli mer hållbara. Ett skyddshölje som är gjort av komposterbart material istället för en laddare kanske inte faller alla i smaken, men det visar åtminstone att man inte alltid måste använda plast som är dålig för miljön. För att skydda sig mot anklagelser om att försöka tjäna extra pengar donerar Nokia också alla pengar de tjänar på att sälja laddare. Man försöker åtminstone att tänka på enheternas miljöpåverkan, och bara det är ett steg i rätt riktning.
Nokia X20
-
05/04/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt
Pricecompare
