Notebookcheck

Test: Motorola Moto X4 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 01/27/2018

Alexa, var är du? Moto X4 släpps med en dual-kamera, IP68-skydd och en tjusig design och försöker erövra mittenskiktsmarknaden. Men det utlovade stödet för Amazon Alexa är inte tillgängligt på vår testenhet. Är Moto X4 fortfarande värd att köpa? Vår recension kommer visa svaret.

Motorola Moto X4 (Moto Serie)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Minne
3072 MB 
Skärm
5.2 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 424 PPI, kapacitiv tryckkänslig, LTPS IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 18.9 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5-mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 256 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerationssensor, gyroskop, närhetssensor, kompass, USB-C, USB-OTG
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1700/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.5 x 148.4 x 73.4
Batteri
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix dual-kamera, fasdetekterande autofocus, f2.0, 1.4µm, 8MP vidvinkelobjektiv med 120°, f2.2, 1.12µm, dubbel LED-blixt
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f2.0, 1µm, LED-blixt
Övrigt
Högtalare: framåtriktad monohögtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt tangentbord, snabbladdare, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Moto, device assistance, 24 Månader Garanti, bandbredd (nerladdning/​uppladdning): 400Mbps/​75Mbps (LTE); SAR-värde: 0.815W/​kg (huvud), 1.54W/​kg (kropp); IP68-certifierad, fanless
Vikt
163 g, Strömförsörjning: 78 g
Pris
399 Kr

 

Motorola Moto X4
Motorola Moto X4
Motorola Moto X4
Motorola Moto X4
Motorola Moto X4
Motorola Moto X4
Motorola Moto X4

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 6
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
574 MBit/s ∼100% +70%
Motorola Moto X4
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
337 MBit/s ∼59%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s ∼58% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s ∼53% -9%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
283 MBit/s ∼49% -16%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
224 MBit/s ∼39% -34%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 6
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
500 MBit/s ∼100% +49%
Motorola Moto X4
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
336 MBit/s ∼67%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
329 MBit/s ∼66% -2%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
274 MBit/s ∼55% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
225 MBit/s ∼45% -33%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140 MBit/s ∼28% -58%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Path
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Path
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS Motorola Moto X4 – Overview
GPS Motorola Moto X4 – Overview
GPS Motorola Moto X4 – Path
GPS Motorola Moto X4 – Path
GPS Motorola Moto X4 – Loop
GPS Motorola Moto X4 – Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
498
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 517 cd/m² Medel: 478.8 cd/m² Minimum: 6.37 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 469 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1268:1 (Svärta: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.1
Motorola Moto X4
LTPS IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
HTC U11 Life
SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Xiaomi Mi 6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
8%
41%
21%
26%
19%
Brightness middle
469
545
16%
574
22%
550
17%
620
32%
656
40%
Brightness
479
526
10%
576
20%
535
12%
586
22%
634
32%
Brightness Distribution
86
87
1%
94
9%
92
7%
89
3%
93
8%
Black Level *
0.37
0.42
-14%
0.42
-14%
0.28
24%
0.4
-8%
Contrast
1268
1298
2%
1310
3%
2214
75%
1640
29%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.5
4.9
11%
2.4
56%
3.3
40%
4.8
13%
5.3
4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.7
8.5
21%
3.8
64%
4.5
58%
8.8
18%
7.8
27%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.7
5.4
19%
1.9
72%
3.6
46%
5.3
21%
5.2
22%
Gamma
2.1 114%
2.31 104%
2.09 115%
2.38 101%
2.25 107%
2.22 108%
CCT
8064 81%
7610 85%
6502 100%
7226 90%
7473 87%
7905 82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 3 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 3 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8882 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 29.6 ms rise
↘ 26.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
70445 Points ∼31%
HTC U11 Life
73617 Points ∼32% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
45549 Points ∼20% -35%
Honor 9
150276 Points ∼65% +113%
Xiaomi Mi 6
181909 Points ∼79% +158%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
68282 Points ∼30% -3%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
4887 Points ∼47%
HTC U11 Life
4835 Points ∼47% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3756 Points ∼36% -23%
Honor 9
6113 Points ∼59% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6686 Points ∼65% +37%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5085 Points ∼49% +4%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
5919 Points ∼58%
HTC U11 Life
5818 Points ∼57% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5000 Points ∼49% -16%
Honor 9
7034 Points ∼69% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 6
7548 Points ∼74% +28%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
6264 Points ∼61% +6%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
795 Points ∼47%
HTC U11 Life
858 Points ∼51% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
666 Points ∼39% -16%
Honor 9
1069 Points ∼63% +34%
Xiaomi Mi 6
1263 Points ∼74% +59%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
766 Points ∼45% -4%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
1519 Points ∼16%
HTC U11 Life
1515 Points ∼16% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
529 Points ∼6% -65%
Honor 9
4126 Points ∼45% +172%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6206 Points ∼67% +309%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1496 Points ∼16% -2%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
1405 Points ∼29%
HTC U11 Life
838 Points ∼17% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1296 Points ∼27% -8%
Honor 9
3258 Points ∼68% +132%
Xiaomi Mi 6
4054 Points ∼84% +189%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1380 Points ∼29% -2%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
3279 Points ∼32%
HTC U11 Life
3215 Points ∼31% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2185 Points ∼21% -33%
Honor 9
4154 Points ∼40% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 6
5857 Points ∼57% +79%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3319 Points ∼32% +1%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
1536 Points ∼36%
HTC U11 Life
1368 Points ∼32% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1000 Points ∼23% -35%
Honor 9
2779 Points ∼65% +81%
Xiaomi Mi 6
3694 Points ∼86% +140%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1513 Points ∼35% -1%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
3894 Points ∼27%
HTC U11 Life
3956 Points ∼28% +2%
Honor 9
Points ∼0% -100%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3942 Points ∼27% +1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
4115 Points ∼14%
HTC U11 Life
4193 Points ∼15% +2%
Honor 9
6527 Points ∼23% +59%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6714 Points ∼23% +63%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
4172 Points ∼14% +1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
870 Points ∼15%
HTC U11 Life
877 Points ∼15% +1%
Honor 9
1869 Points ∼31% +115%
Xiaomi Mi 6
1938 Points ∼33% +123%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
865 Points ∼15% -1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
1811 Points ∼49%
HTC U11 Life
1779 Points ∼48% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1670 Points ∼46% -8%
Honor 9
2287 Points ∼62% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 6
3007 Points ∼82% +66%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1751 Points ∼48% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
724 Points ∼13%
HTC U11 Life
729 Points ∼14% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
253 Points ∼5% -65%
Honor 9
2798 Points ∼52% +286%
Xiaomi Mi 6
4072 Points ∼76% +462%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
726 Points ∼13% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
835 Points ∼18%
HTC U11 Life
839 Points ∼18% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
312 Points ∼7% -63%
Honor 9
2666 Points ∼56% +219%
Xiaomi Mi 6
3775 Points ∼80% +352%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
835 Points ∼18% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
1816 Points ∼50%
HTC U11 Life
1711 Points ∼47% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1699 Points ∼47% -6%
Honor 9
1809 Points ∼50% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 6
2921 Points ∼80% +61%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1785 Points ∼49% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
1259 Points ∼15%
HTC U11 Life
1257 Points ∼15% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
407 Points ∼5% -68%
Honor 9
2990 Points ∼36% +137%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6231 Points ∼75% +395%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1289 Points ∼16% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
1351 Points ∼21%
HTC U11 Life
1336 Points ∼21% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
490 Points ∼8% -64%
Honor 9
2611 Points ∼41% +93%
Xiaomi Mi 6
4978 Points ∼78% +268%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1374 Points ∼22% +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
12870 Points ∼16%
HTC U11 Life
12919 Points ∼16% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12954 Points ∼16% +1%
Honor 9
15150 Points ∼19% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 6
20330 Points ∼26% +58%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
13014 Points ∼16% +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
18355 Points ∼4%
HTC U11 Life
18469 Points ∼4% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7793 Points ∼2% -58%
Honor 9
38979 Points ∼8% +112%
Xiaomi Mi 6
58228 Points ∼12% +217%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
18386 Points ∼4% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
16767 Points ∼8%
HTC U11 Life
16859 Points ∼8% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
8550 Points ∼4% -49%
Honor 9
28883 Points ∼14% +72%
Xiaomi Mi 6
41172 Points ∼20% +146%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
16841 Points ∼8% 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
30 fps ∼2%
HTC U11 Life
30 fps ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12 fps ∼1% -60%
Honor 9
60 fps ∼3% +100%
Xiaomi Mi 6
119 fps ∼7% +297%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
30 fps ∼2% 0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
31 fps ∼7%
HTC U11 Life
29 fps ∼6% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
19 fps ∼4% -39%
Honor 9
55 fps ∼12% +77%
Xiaomi Mi 6
60 fps ∼13% +94%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
29 fps ∼6% -6%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
14 fps ∼3%
HTC U11 Life
14 fps ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5 fps ∼1% -64%
Honor 9
30 fps ∼5% +114%
Xiaomi Mi 6
63 fps ∼11% +350%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼3% 0%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
15 fps ∼4%
HTC U11 Life
14 fps ∼4% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
9.8 fps ∼3% -35%
Honor 9
28 fps ∼8% +87%
Xiaomi Mi 6
56 fps ∼15% +273%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼4% -7%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
9.6 fps ∼2%
HTC U11 Life
9.7 fps ∼2% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3.2 fps ∼1% -67%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼4% +129%
Xiaomi Mi 6
43 fps ∼8% +348%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.7 fps ∼2% +1%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
11 fps ∼6%
HTC U11 Life
9.8 fps ∼6% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7.3 fps ∼4% -34%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼13% +100%
Xiaomi Mi 6
42 fps ∼24% +282%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.5 fps ∼5% -14%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
5.3 fps ∼1%
HTC U11 Life
5.5 fps ∼1% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1.9 fps ∼0% -64%
Honor 9
15 fps ∼4% +183%
Xiaomi Mi 6
26 fps ∼7% +391%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼1% 0%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X4
5.7 fps ∼5%
HTC U11 Life
5.4 fps ∼5% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3.9 fps ∼3% -32%
Honor 9
16 fps ∼14% +181%
Xiaomi Mi 6
26 fps ∼22% +356%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼5% -7%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
32.14 fps ∼83%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.81 fps ∼25%
Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
38773 Points ∼88%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
733 Points ∼39%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
190 Points ∼10%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6
60.1 fps ∼98%

Legend

 
Motorola Moto X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U11 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
70.453 Points ∼100% +129%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
58.6 Points ∼83% +90%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
30.81 Points ∼44%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
28.993 Points ∼41% -6%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
28.09 Points ∼40% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
23.281 Points ∼33% -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
11909 Points ∼100% +136%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
10208 Points ∼86% +102%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
5050 Points ∼42%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
4893 Points ∼41% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
4398 Points ∼37% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
3799 Points ∼32% -25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
9669.2 ms * ∼100% -15%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
9493 ms * ∼98% -13%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
9425 ms * ∼97% -12%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
8396 ms * ∼87%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
3149 ms * ∼33% +62%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
2667.5 ms * ∼28% +68%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
107 Points ∼100% +24%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
100 Points ∼93% +16%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
95 Points ∼89% +10%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
86 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
64 Points ∼60% -26%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto X4HTC U11 LifeSamsung Galaxy A3 2017Honor 9Xiaomi Mi 6Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
AndroBench 3-5
-5%
-42%
-1%
96%
9%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
50.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-17%
34.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-42%
66.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.75 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
75.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-10%
67.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-19%
86.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
Random Write 4KB
55.3
50.2
-9%
9.62
-83%
32.7
-41%
25.19
-54%
7.59
-86%
Random Read 4KB
45.4
39.3
-13%
22.32
-51%
55.7
23%
143.49
216%
68.57
51%
Sequential Write 256KB
120.5
120
0%
45.96
-62%
204
69%
196.7
63%
205.27
70%
Sequential Read 256KB
281.6
268
-5%
199.68
-29%
293
4%
728.2
159%
287.38
2%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
Hög belastning
 35.3 °C31.3 °C29.8 °C 
 36.3 °C31.1 °C28.8 °C 
 33.6 °C30 °C27.9 °C 
Max: 36.3 °C
Medel: 31.6 °C
28.2 °C30 °C29.7 °C
27.3 °C29.4 °C29.4 °C
27.2 °C28.7 °C28.3 °C
Max: 30 °C
Medel: 28.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  21.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.241.62532.9403137.239.44031.734.95039.641.56328.331.28027.333.910026.929.412526.735.51602443.120020.948.925020.954.631519.558.440018.564.450017.568.163017.567.780015.768.9100015.870.4125016.671.8160015.872.4200015.472.1250015.576.531501677.8400015.872.350001673.5630016.370.4800016.376.91000016.2771250016.474.81600016.467SPL28.685.9N1.165median 16.4Motorola Moto X4median 70.4Delta2.17.435.245.132.941.137.238.931.736.639.642.728.33427.33026.930.226.736.32441.720.946.520.950.619.551.718.557.517.556.917.556.615.760.915.870.316.675.715.878.515.479.615.581.21679.415.8781674.416.377.316.381.316.283.816.468.316.455.328.690.21.176median 16.4HTC U11 Lifemedian 68.32.113.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Motorola Moto X4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HTC U11 Life audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.17 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.65 / 1.51 / 1.57 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.88 / 5.47 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto X4
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6
3350 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Power Consumption
-9%
50%
-48%
-10%
-34%
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.63
3%
0.37
43%
1.13
-74%
0.45
31%
0.84
-29%
Idle Average *
1.51
2.1
-39%
0.78
48%
2.25
-49%
1.67
-11%
2.31
-53%
Idle Maximum *
1.57
2.15
-37%
0.84
46%
2.3
-46%
1.69
-8%
2.33
-48%
Load Average *
3.88
3.34
14%
1.52
61%
4.89
-26%
4.07
-5%
4.76
-23%
Load Maximum *
5.47
4.83
12%
2.75
50%
7.99
-46%
8.54
-56%
6.39
-17%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
27tim 32min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10tim 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11tim 28min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 49min
Motorola Moto X4
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6
3350 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
10%
51%
-15%
12%
-4%
Reader / Idle
1652
1820
10%
2862
73%
1399
-15%
1665
1%
H.264
688
798
16%
988
44%
564
-18%
698
1%
WiFi v1.3
659
725
10%
668
1%
516
-22%
739
12%
562
-15%
Load
289
303
5%
532
84%
278
-4%
286
-1%

För

+ väldigt robust hölje
+ tjusig design
+ dedikerad 3.5-mm ljudanslutning
+ fingeravtrycksläsare som kan användas för navigering
+ flera röstassistenter tillgängliga
+ snabbt WiFi
+ exakt GPS
+ hyfsad röstkvalitet
+ skarpa kamerabilder vid bra ljusförhållanden
+ blir knappt varm
+ bra högtalare
+ bra batteritid

Emot

- baksidan mottaglig för smuts
- mikrofonen förvränger ljudet en aning
- medioker kameraljusstyrka vid dåliga ljusförhållanden
- skärmen har en blå ton
In review: Motorola Moto X4. Review unit courtesy of Lenovo Germany.
In review: Motorola Moto X4. Review unit courtesy of Lenovo Germany.

Motorola har introducerat en tjusig, högkvalitativ mittenskiktstelefon på marknaden som överraskar med ett flertal nya idéer, vilket är vanligt för Motorola: Det är ganska innovativt att användaren kan skapa ett Bluetooth-ljudsystem från flera högtalare via 5 GHz WiFi och att man stöds av inte bara en utan flera röstassistenter. Men det utlovade stödet för Alexa tillsammans med appen som inte var förinstallerad på vår testenhet skapade en del förvirring.

Snabbt WiFi, pålitlig GPS, gediget hölje, enkla men mångsidia kontroller, hyfsad kamera vid bra ljusförhållanden, tillräcklig prestanda, bra högtalare och batteritider som är lämpade för vardagligt arbete. Så kan vi sammanfatta fördelarna hos denna testenhet, och Moto X4 har väldigt få riktiga nackdelar: Skärmen har en synlig blå ton, ljusstyrkan på kamerabilder tagna vid dåliga ljusförhållanden är medioker och tillverkaren borde skämmas över faktum att 6 månader efter att Android Oreo släppts så finns det fortfarande enheter som släpps med den föregående versionen.

Motorola X4 är en bra mittenskiktsenhet med flertalet fördelar och många innovativa idéer.

Vi kan definitivt uttala en köprekommendation för Moto X4. De som ofta använder sin smartphone för att navigera kommer vara särskilt nöjda med den här enheten. Inte bara det, med det stora antalet andra fördelar skulle troligen Alexa säga: "Enligt notebookcheck.com så rekommenderas köp av Motorola Moto X4.

Motorola Moto X4 - 01/18/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Design
90%
Tangentbord
68 / 75 → 91%
Mus
91%
Anslutningar
47 / 60 → 78%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
84%
Spelprestanda
41 / 63 → 65%
Programprestanda
54 / 70 → 77%
Temperatur
92%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
75%
Medel
76%
86%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Motorola Moto X4 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2018-01-27 (Update: 2018-01-27)