Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Medion Erazer Beast X10 (Tongfang GM7MPHP) - Stabil, tunn och kompakt spellaptop med bra batteritid (Sammanfattning)

Framgångsrik. Kompakta Erazer Beast X10 kan visa alla de senaste datorspelen smidigt på sin matta 17.3-tumsskärm (Full HD, IPS, 144 Hz). Speldatorn får poäng för 32 GB RAM (med dubbla kanaler), plats för två NVMe SSD-enheter samt bra batteritid.
Comet Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 (Erazer Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, 120 W PL2 / Short Burst, 120 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1380 MHz, Minne: 1750 MHz, 115 W TDP, GDDR6, 27.21.14.5730 (Nvidia 457.30), Optimus
Minne
32 GB 
, DDR4 2666, Dubbla kanaler, Två minnesplatser (båda används)
Skärm
17.30 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, LG Phillips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, glansig: nej, 144 Hz
Moderkort
Intel HM470
Hårddisk
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB 
, 2x M.2 2280 (NVMe), ej RAID 0/1, 863 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC274 @ Intel Comet Point-H PCH - cAVS
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Mikrofon in, Kombinerad port för headset, Kortläsare: microSD, TPM 2.0
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 24.6 x 394.8 x 261.8
Batteri
91.2 Wh, 7900 mAh Litiumpolymer, 6 celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, CyberLink PowerRecover, McAfee LiveSafe (Testversion), MS Office 365 (Testversion), 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.26 kg, Strömförsörjning: 490 g
Pris
2 Euro
Länkar
Medion hemsida
Medion kategori
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.7 %
12/2020
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		2.3 kg24.6 mm17.30"1920x1080
85.8 %
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile		2.6 kg27.45 mm17.30"1920x1080
83.1 %
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile		2.8 kg26.5 mm17.30"1920x1080
83.6 %
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		2.8 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
83.7 %
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.3 kg18.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
87.4 %
06/2020
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.7 kg19.9 mm17.30"1920x1080

Storleksjämförelse

❌
404 mm 280 mm 25 mm 2.8 kg399 mm 293 mm 26.5 mm 2.8 kg395.7 mm 260.8 mm 27.45 mm 2.6 kg394.8 mm 261.8 mm 24.6 mm 2.3 kg396 mm 259 mm 18.9 mm 2.3 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.7 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Höger: Minneskortsläsare (microSD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Typ A)
Höger: Minneskortsläsare (microSD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Typ A)
Vänster: Plats för kabellås, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Typ A), Mikrofon in, Hörlurar ut
Vänster: Plats för kabellås, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Typ A), Mikrofon in, Hörlurar ut
Baksidan: Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet, Nätadapter
Baksidan: Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet, Nätadapter
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1340 MBit/s +14%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1283 (1089min - 1413max) MBit/s +9%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1270 (1080min - 1388max) MBit/s +8%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1190 MBit/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1180 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)
1139 MBit/s -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1090 MBit/s -8%
iperf3 receive AX12
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1480 MBit/s
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1420 MBit/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1390 MBit/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s -7%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1280 MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s -15%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1182 (1085min - 1338max) MBit/s -20%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1177 (773min - 1353max) MBit/s -20%
ColorChecker
31.3 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
26 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
21 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804: 19.69 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 32.41 ∆E
ColorChecker
19.7 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
12 ∆E
15 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
17 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake: 14.95 ∆E min: 8.47 - max: 20.89 ∆E
ColorChecker
7.3 ∆E
18 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
18 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8: 14.49 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 21.79 ∆E
ColorChecker
9.3 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI GS75 10SF-609US: 10.91 ∆E min: 1.18 - max: 19.22 ∆E
ColorChecker
4.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz: 8.71 ∆E min: 1.66 - max: 21.72 ∆E
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 HzRazer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
MSI GS75 10SF-609USMSI GS75 10SF-609US
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet LakeSCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
277
cd/m²		300
cd/m²		297
cd/m²
300
cd/m²		313
cd/m²		300
cd/m²
295
cd/m²		297
cd/m²		297
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
LG Phillips LP173WFG-SPB3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 313 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 297.3 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 313 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1159:1 (Svärta: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.187
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
LG Phillips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
BOE HF NE173FHM-NZ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Sharp LQ173M1JW05, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display
7%
1%
-2%
12%
9%
Display P3 Coverage
64.5
69.4
8%
65.2
1%
62.6
-3%
75.6
17%
72.2
12%
sRGB Coverage
95.6
99.2
4%
96.8
1%
94.3
-1%
99.8
4%
98.5
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.6
70.9
8%
66.4
1%
64.7
-1%
75.1
14%
73
11%
Response Times
31%
-2%
-11%
50%
33%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8)
10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2)
25%
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
-0%
16.4 ?(8, 8.4)
-14%
5 ?(2.2, 2.8)
65%
5.6 ?(2.6, 3)
61%
Response Time Black / White *
10 ?(5.2, 4.8)
6.4 ?(3, 3.2)
36%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
-4%
10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2)
-8%
6.6 ?(2.6, 4)
34%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
4%
PWM Frequency
24510 ?(19)
Screen
8%
2%
27%
6%
-21%
Brightness middle
313
327
4%
323
3%
322
3%
299.4
-4%
328
5%
Brightness
297
305
3%
300
1%
308
4%
299
1%
329
11%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
89
1%
92
5%
84
-5%
78
-11%
Black Level *
0.27
0.32
-19%
0.31
-15%
0.18
33%
0.31
-15%
0.35
-30%
Contrast
1159
1022
-12%
1042
-10%
1789
54%
966
-17%
937
-19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.96
2.16
27%
3.01
-2%
1.53
48%
1.82
39%
4.74
-60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.83
6.14
38%
7.65
22%
3.14
68%
3.91
60%
8.99
9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.03
0.89
14%
1
3%
0.74
28%
1.59
-54%
2.12
-106%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.9
3.7
24%
3.8
22%
1.9
61%
2.7
45%
6.8
-39%
Gamma
2.187 101%
2.24 98%
2.154 102%
2.144 103%
2.18 101%
2.2 100%
CCT
7559 86%
6799 96%
7507 87%
6809 95%
6837 95%
6446 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
66
71
8%
66
0%
65
-2%
67.1
2%
64.8
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89
93
4%
90
1%
87
-2%
99.8
12%
98.6
11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
15% / 11%
0% / 2%
5% / 17%
23% / 12%
7% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 6.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
 
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1347 (1332.27-1364.11)
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H; Office Mode (Eco): Ø732 (717.91-804.34)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1380 (1371.22-1443.31)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H; Overboost: Ø1766 (1751.01-1787.71)
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1296 (1270.16-1339.9)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1290 (1277.75-1322.62)
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1620 (1596.04-1713.21)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1362 (1352.68-1494.38)
CPU-klockfrekvenser under en CB15 loop
CPU-klockfrekvenser under en CB15 loop
CPU-klockfrekvenser under en CB15 loop (Office Mode - Eco)
CPU-klockfrekvenser under en CB15 loop (Office Mode - Eco)
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
196 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1364 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
132.9 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Hjälp
Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points +37%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
210 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
208 Points +6%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
202 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
200 Points +2%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
198 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (184 - 213, n=45)
196.7 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
196 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
195 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))
184 Points -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3089 Points +126%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
1788 Points +31%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
1713 (1596.04min - 1713.21max) Points +26%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
1549 (1352.68min - 1494.38max) Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
1443 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
1364 Points
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
1344 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
1323 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (804 - 1418, n=50)
1263 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))
804 Points -41%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))
531 Seconds * -65%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (322 - 587, n=43)
389 Seconds * -21%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
351 Seconds * -9%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
347 Seconds * -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
324 Seconds * -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
322 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
321 Seconds * -0%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
280 Seconds * +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
258.6 Seconds * +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)
199.8 Seconds * +38%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)
6122 MIPS +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
5594 MIPS +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
5556 MIPS +7%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
5245 MIPS +1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
5232 MIPS +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
5191 MIPS
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
5190 MIPS 0%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
5118 MIPS -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (4504 - 5470, n=43)
5114 MIPS -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))
5081 MIPS -2%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)
76978 MIPS +108%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
49474 MIPS +33%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
48397 MIPS +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
44252 MIPS +19%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
37082 MIPS
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
36718 MIPS -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (26040 - 37345, n=43)
33946 MIPS -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
33674 MIPS -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
31612 MIPS -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))
26040 MIPS -30%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)
698 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
507 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
501 Points
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
494 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
483 Points
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
475 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (431 - 504, n=43)
473 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
463 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)
7419 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
4059 Points
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
3885 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
3367 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
3323 Points
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
3247 Points
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
3144 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (1749 - 3325, n=43)
2848 Points
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=231, last 2 years)
1808 Points +36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
1346 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
1331 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
1321 Points -1%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
1290 Points -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
1278 Points -4%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
1271 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (1114 - 1333, n=43)
1263 Points -5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
1262 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)
13567 Points +104%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
8412 Points +26%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
8363 Points +26%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
7531 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
7373 Points +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
6652 Points
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
6370 Points -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
6349 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (4443 - 6674, n=43)
6135 Points -8%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)
21.2 fps +83%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
14.1 fps +22%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.8 fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
11.9 fps +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
11.6 fps
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.8 fps -7%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.4 fps -10%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (5.54 - 11.6, n=43)
9.61 fps -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))
7.11 fps -39%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
57.8 s * -20%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
55.4 s * -15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
54.3 s * -12%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (43.1 - 99.2, n=43)
53.3 s * -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
51.9 s * -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))
50.6 s * -5%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
50.2 s * -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)
49.2 s * -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
48.36 s *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
41.93 s * +13%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.614 sec * -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))
0.613 sec * -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (0.578 - 0.708, n=42)
0.611 sec * -3%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.609 sec * -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.593 sec *
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.589 sec * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)
0.566 sec * +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.546 sec * +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)
0.4699 sec * +21%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4350 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4277 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5792 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
5581 poäng
Hjälp
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7580 Points +36%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
6582 Points +18%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6290 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
  (5581 - 6093, n=2)
5837 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5747 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5581 Points
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5262 Points -6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
5109 Points -8%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4166 - 6653, n=34, last 2 years)
5222 Points +20%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
5217 Points +20%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
4780 Points +10%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
4412 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
4405 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4350 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
  ()
4350 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
4291 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6317 Points +9%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
6191 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4622 - 7085, n=32, last 2 years)
6048 Points +4%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5832 Points +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
5817 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5803 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5792 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
  ()
5792 Points 0%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
3226 μs * -310%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
1030 μs * -31%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
787 μs *
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
506 μs * +36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
450.4 μs * +43%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
364 μs * +54%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3542 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3017 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 569 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 494.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1049 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1109 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 49.29 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 151 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR		SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB		Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00		MSI GS75 10SF-609US
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Lite-On CA5-8D512		Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
35%
0%
24%
32%
21%
18%
Write 4K
151
158.6
5%
141.1
-7%
141.9
-6%
177.9
18%
119
-21%
139.7 ?(76.2 - 229, n=36)
-7%
Read 4K
49.29
53.6
9%
60.9
24%
48.75
-1%
47.42
-4%
51.9
5%
49.9 ?(34.3 - 75.5, n=36)
1%
Write Seq
1109
2671
141%
1681
52%
2734
147%
2707
144%
2258
104%
2036 ?(776 - 2975, n=35)
84%
Read Seq
1049
2130
103%
1602
53%
1921
83%
2369
126%
2283
118%
2014 ?(973 - 2639, n=35)
92%
Write 4K Q32T1
494.4
525
6%
406.6
-18%
422.6
-15%
427.8
-13%
491
-1%
461 ?(268 - 656, n=36)
-7%
Read 4K Q32T1
569
609
7%
470.2
-17%
509
-11%
543
-5%
540
-5%
499 ?(289 - 730, n=36)
-12%
Write Seq Q32T1
3017
3308
10%
1759
-42%
3055
1%
2703
-10%
2253
-25%
2903 ?(788 - 3033, n=36)
-4%
Read Seq Q32T1
3542
3557
0%
1932
-45%
3257
-8%
3387
-4%
3172
-10%
3479 ?(2853 - 3568, n=36)
-2%
AS SSD
5%
-46%
-6%
-39%
-82%
-10%
Seq Read
2470
2882
17%
1778
-28%
2828
14%
2327
-6%
2019
-18%
2553 ?(1938 - 3148, n=37)
3%
Seq Write
2473
2764
12%
1478
-40%
2677
8%
2479
0%
1314
-47%
2084 ?(1248 - 2837, n=37)
-16%
4K Read
50.2
55.9
11%
49.76
-1%
39.94
-20%
45.46
-9%
46.61
-7%
53.1 ?(44.3 - 68.4, n=37)
6%
4K Write
124.4
129.4
4%
117.9
-5%
100.9
-19%
157.4
27%
90.2
-27%
131.2 ?(87.4 - 208, n=37)
5%
4K-64 Read
1711
1793
5%
591
-65%
1562
-9%
1050
-39%
665
-61%
1477 ?(762 - 2093, n=37)
-14%
4K-64 Write
1848
2140
16%
875
-53%
1867
1%
938
-49%
813
-56%
1805 ?(1074 - 2152, n=37)
-2%
Access Time Read *
0.039
0.054
-38%
0.082
-110%
0.076
-95%
0.058
-49%
0.04983 ?(0.032 - 0.087, n=36)
-28%
Access Time Write *
0.029
0.03
-3%
0.041
-41%
0.037
-28%
0.071
-145%
0.167
-476%
0.04222 ?(0.017 - 0.128, n=37)
-46%
Score Read
2008
2137
6%
818
-59%
1885
-6%
1328
-34%
913
-55%
1786 ?(1078 - 2449, n=37)
-11%
Score Write
2220
2546
15%
1140
-49%
2236
1%
1343
-40%
1034
-53%
2144 ?(1471 - 2527, n=37)
-3%
Score Total
5257
5774
10%
2377
-55%
5076
-3%
3366
-36%
2392
-54%
4826 ?(3309 - 6095, n=37)
-8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
20% / 18%
-23% / -27%
9% / 7%
-4% / -9%
-31% / -39%
4% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data
Fire Strike (Game Mode, nätansluten)
Fire Strike (Game Mode, nätansluten)
Fire Strike (Game Mode, batteridrift)
Fire Strike (Game Mode, batteridrift)
Fire Strike (Turbo Mode, nätansluten)
Fire Strike (Turbo Mode, nätansluten)
Fire Strike (Office Mode, nätansluten)
Fire Strike (Office Mode, nätansluten)
Fire Strike (Office Mode, batteridrift)
Fire Strike (Office Mode, batteridrift)
Fire Strike (Office Mode - Eco, nätansluten)
Fire Strike (Office Mode - Eco, nätansluten)
3DMark 11 Performance
21735 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
40152 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18534 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
7736 poäng
Hjälp
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=230, last 2 years)
40451 Points +49%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
29011 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H
28502 Points +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
27694 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
27153 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
  (24244 - 28900, n=10)
27104 Points 0%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
24066 Points -11%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
20697 Points -24%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)
136246 Points +7%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
134255 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H
131420 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
126845 Points
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
123700 Points -2%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
121539 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
  (65295 - 134954, n=7)
117307 Points -8%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
103797 Points -18%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=234, last 2 years)
29442 Points +37%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
21532 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
21446 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H
21327 Points -1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
21191 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
  (18559 - 21446, n=10)
20277 Points -5%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
18517 Points -14%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
16408 Points -23%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=232, last 2 years)
12060 Points +54%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
8267 Points +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
8065 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H
7840 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
7837 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
  (7084 - 7891, n=10)
7445 Points -5%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
7057 Points -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
6219 Points -21%
The Witcher 3 | Horizon Zero Dawn | Serious Sam 4 | Watch Dogs Legion | Dirt 5 | Doom Eternal
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years)
116.8 fps +26%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
92.5 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
90.8 fps -2%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
87.8 (68min) fps -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
80.9 (75min - 90max) fps -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
  (62.7 - 92.5, n=10)
75.1 fps -19%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
68.5 (52min) fps -26%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
67.5 (61min - 75max) fps -27%
Horizon Zero Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultimate Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (108.3 - 163, n=5, last 2 years)
132.3 fps +42%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
98 (32min - 175max) fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
93 (42min - 164max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
  ()
93 fps 0%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
77 fps -17%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
62 fps -33%
Serious Sam 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra (DX12) AA:2xMS
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
72.5 (15.8min, 21.9P0.1, 44.1P1 - 135max) fps +7%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
71.1 (2.42min, 32.4P1 - 130max) fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
67.7 (8.28min, 19.1P0.1, 35.5P1 - 124max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
  ()
67.7 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (42.5 - 82.9, n=2, last 2 years)
62.7 fps -7%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
59.8 (17.7min, 33.1P1 - 118max) fps -12%
Watch Dogs Legion - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (DX12)
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 127, n=14, last 2 years)
77.2 fps +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
59.3 (35.6min, 39.1P0.1, 47.1P1 - 99.5max) fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
59 (21min, 26P0.1, 44P1 - 95max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
  ()
59 fps 0%
Dirt 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 110.5, n=6, last 2 years)
85.5 fps +31%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
65.1 (49.9min, 52.3P0.1, 55.3P1 - 88.3max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
  ()
65.1 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
45.5 (35min, 36.3P0.1, 37.6P1 - 59.4max) fps -30%
Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
155.4 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
151 fps +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
146.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
  (130.2 - 146.4, n=4)
137.2 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (22.2 - 189.7, n=5, last 2 years)
130.7 fps -11%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
124.4 fps -15%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø86 (78-91)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø88.3 (76-95)
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8: Ø88.9 (80-96)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00: Ø68.8 (62-74)
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G: Ø64.2 (60-71)
GPU-mätvärden under The Witcher 3-testet
GPU-mätvärden under The Witcher 3-testet
låg med. hög ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 326.3 254.1 163.1 92.5
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 260.9 141.2 97.5 68.7
Doom Eternal (2020) 229.6 164.1 149.4 146.4
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 145 120 107 93
Serious Sam 4 (2020) 127 87.7 81.9 67.7
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 100 96 84 59
Dirt 5 (2020) 160 95.6 78.2 65.1
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 118 81 70 60
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War (2020) 163.7 93.6 86.2 77.4
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 135.7 102.6 101.6 86.1

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
26 / 29 / 35 dB(A)
Hög belastning
52 / 55 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.643.543.835.542.335.52535.53941.835.937.334.73142.844.65042.241.247.84030.431.935.234.429.431.85043.34345.84724.426.86330.828.929.533.126.728.88042.724.828.627.819.440.510028.621.427.228.415.731.112528.920.92826.71830.316032.224.227.926.2183320032.624.62321.220.533.82503423.124.122.816.335.531536.32420.31712.637.840035.623.421.112.91238.750037.426.119.813.110.739.263037.121.817.515.310.439.580038.121.514.611.510.140100040.322.415.31110.742.2125043.624.216.111.71145.3160043.524.61611.611.645.7200041.421.914.311.711.743.5250040.720.914.812.51243315040.221.815.713.112.542.7400039.820.214.113.213.142.4500041.120.516.713.813.643.6630039.918.816.314.71442.6800036.715.614.713.913.640.11000034.114.814.41413.138.21250030.114.614.514.612.534.21600025.813.713.7131229.7SPL52.5342926.524.654.8N8.621.20.90.610.1median 37.1median 21.8median 16.1median 13.8median 12.5median 39.5Delta4.22.43.53.51.44.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMedion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile		Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
3%
-5%
3%
-4%
2%
-5%
7%
off / environment *
25
25
-0%
25
-0%
24
4%
26.2
-5%
28.2
-13%
27.9 ?(24 - 30, n=9)
-12%
24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=182, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Minimum *
26
26
-0%
32
-23%
25
4%
31.2
-20%
28.2
-8%
30.8 ?(24 - 35, n=9)
-18%
25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=184, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Average *
29
30
-3%
34
-17%
30
-3%
31.4
-8%
28.2
3%
32.1 ?(24 - 36, n=9)
-11%
27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=184, last 2 years)
6%
Idle Maximum *
35
33
6%
37
-6%
37
-6%
34
3%
30.5
13%
35.8 ?(24 - 41, n=9)
-2%
30.7 ?(21.9 - 47, n=184, last 2 years)
12%
Load Average *
52
50
4%
51
2%
48
8%
49.5
5%
42.2
19%
47.5 ?(36.1 - 53, n=9)
9%
43.1 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=184, last 2 years)
17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53
50
6%
50
6%
50
6%
50.6
5%
53
-0%
Load Maximum *
55
52
5%
53
4%
52
5%
60.7
-10%
55.5
-1%
52.3 ?(46 - 55, n=9)
5%
53.4 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=184, last 2 years)
3%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 46 °C51 °C42 °C 
 39 °C50 °C37 °C 
 33 °C39 °C35 °C 
Max: 51 °C
Medel: 41.3 °C
49 °C56 °C43 °C
46 °C55 °C31 °C
34 °C34 °C30 °C
Max: 56 °C
Medel: 42 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  56 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile		Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
1%
-0%
-3%
1%
-6%
-1%
3%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
48
6%
53
-4%
53
-4%
49.8
2%
40.8
20%
49.5 ?(44 - 53, n=8)
3%
46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=182, last 2 years)
10%
Maximum Bottom *
56
54
4%
56
-0%
59
-5%
55.6
1%
48.4
14%
58.4 ?(52.2 - 63, n=8)
-4%
49.5 ?(30 - 66.3, n=182, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Upper Side *
31
30
3%
29
6%
29
6%
28.2
9%
36.8
-19%
29.3 ?(26 - 37.2, n=8)
5%
31.3 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=182, last 2 years)
-1%
Idle Bottom *
30
33
-10%
31
-3%
32
-7%
32.2
-7%
41.2
-37%
31.9 ?(29 - 41.4, n=8)
-6%
32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=182, last 2 years)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.336.62537.3343141.243.84029.434.75024.448.16326.729.58019.427.610015.731.41251827.81601829.920020.537.725016.353.431512.660.84001263.450010.763.763010.467.780010.167.3100010.761.412501161.8160011.665.3200011.76425001262.2315012.564.3400013.163.9500013.668.663001464.1800013.658.11000013.158.11250012.561.1160001260.6SPL24.676.5N0.639.6median 12.5median 61.8Delta1.47hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMedion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 19 / 22 / 30 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 118 / 274 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile		Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
2%
16%
37%
2%
2%
9%
13%
Idle Minimum *
19
17
11%
10
47%
6
68%
19.2
-1%
19.6
-3%
15.3 ?(5.8 - 20, n=8)
19%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=178, last 2 years)
27%
Idle Average *
22
20
9%
14
36%
11
50%
22.4
-2%
21.7
1%
19.3 ?(11.4 - 23, n=8)
12%
19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=178, last 2 years)
13%
Idle Maximum *
30
29
3%
25
17%
19
37%
34.7
-16%
36.1
-20%
30.5 ?(13.9 - 38, n=8)
-2%
26.9 ?(9 - 101.1, n=178, last 2 years)
10%
Load Average *
118
121
-3%
134
-14%
96
19%
106.7
10%
115.6
2%
108.5 ?(93.2 - 118.4, n=8)
8%
111.1 ?(32.1 - 202, n=177, last 2 years)
6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
176
199
-13%
186
-6%
144
18%
160.5
9%
157
11%
Load Maximum *
274
258
6%
230
16%
197
28%
248.7
9%
219.9
20%
246 ?(221 - 274, n=8)
10%
251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=176, last 2 years)
8%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
11tim 24min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 86)
6tim 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8tim 29min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 57min
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 91.2 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 62.32 Wh		Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 66 Wh		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 59 Wh		MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-45%
-19%
-18%
18%
-28%
-20%
Reader / Idle
684
543
-21%
493
-28%
513
-25%
544 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years)
-20%
H.264
509
426
-16%
353
-31%
399 ?(56 - 747, n=91, last 2 years)
-22%
WiFi v1.3
410
227
-45%
330
-20%
306
-25%
295
-28%
296
-28%
368 ?(57 - 745, n=180, last 2 years)
-10%
Load
117
94
-20%
133
14%
243
108%
84.4 ?(36 - 173, n=142, last 2 years)
-28%

För

+ Matt IPS-skärm
+ 144 Hz-panel
+ Tunn skärminfattning
+ Kompakt och stabilt metallhölje
+ NVMe SSD
+ Plats för en andra NVMe SSD
+ Bra batteritid
+ Eko-läge för kontorsbruk
+ Thunderbolt 3

Emot

- Saknar stöd för RAID 0/1
- SSD-enheten avger ibland ett elektroniskt tjutande/sprakande ljud
- Endast microSD-kortläsare
- Låter mycket vid belastning
Medion Erazer Beast X10 (MD61804), recensionsex från Medion Germany.
Medion Erazer Beast X10 (MD61804), recensionsex från Medion Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Medions spellaptop på 17.3 tum visar alla de senaste spelen smidigt på sin skärm tack vare en Core i7-10750H processor och en GeForce RTX 2070 Super GPU. Hårdvaran kommer med 32 GB RAM (dubbla kanaler, max. 64 GB) samt en NVMe SSD-enhet på 1 TB.

Ljudnivån, som är ganska hög i spelläget, går att sänka till en nivå som är bekväm vid användning till vardags. Ett "Eko"-läge sänker processorns prestanda och således också ljudutvecklingen. Core i7-processorn hamnar då på i princip samma nivå som en ULV CPU - tillräckligt för kontors- och internetapplikationer. 

Med sin Erazer Beast X10 levererar Medion en tunn och kompakt spellaptop som kan beskrivas som lyckad.

Datorn kommer med ett batteri på 91 Wh, vilket ger en praktisk batteritid (WLAN-drift, videouppspelning, ordbehandling) på 7 till 8 timmar. Den responsiva skärmen (Full HD, IPS, 144 Hz) har breda betraktningsvinklar och god färgåtergivning. Den har okej ljusstyrka och kontrast. En Thunderbolt 3-port gör det möjligt att ansluta avancerade dockningslösningar såsom en extern GPU. Dessutom förtjänar det tjusiga och väldigt stabila metallhöljet beröm.

Tips: Under perioden från 28:e Augusti 2020 till 28:e Februari 2021 ingår spelet "Marvel's Avengers" som en gratis nerladdning om man köper Beast X10. Det kommer dock inte från Medion utan från Intel. Erbjudandekoden skickas ("så länge lagret räcker") via epost och måste lösas in hos Intel innan 31:e Mars 2021. Medion har informerat oss om att detaljerna om hur detta går till står i mailet. Erbjudandet är heller inte begränsat till Medion. Andra laptoptillverkare deltar också i Intels kampanj.

Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 - 11/26/2020 v7
Sascha Mölck

Design
86 / 98 → 88%
Tangentbord
83%
Mus
83%
Anslutningar
66 / 80 → 82%
Vikt
61 / 10-66 → 92%
Batteri
75 / 95 → 79%
Skärm
84%
Spelprestanda
96%
Programprestanda
90%
Temperatur
80 / 95 → 84%
Ljudnivå
66 / 90 → 73%
Audio
71%
Camera
40 / 85 → 46%
Medel
75%
85%
Gaming - Vägt medel

More articles related to this device

Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 (Erazer Serie)
Test
•
Medion Erazer Beast X40 recens...
|
Test
•
Recension av Medion Erazer Maj...
|
Test
•
Recension av Medion Erazer Bea...

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Medion Erazer Beast X10 (Tongfang GM7MPHP) - Stabil, tunn och kompakt spellaptop med bra batteritid (Sammanfattning)
Sascha Mölck, 2020-12-10 (Update: 2020-12-10)