Notebookcheck

Test: Lenovo ThinkPad T490s (i5, Lågenergi-FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 05/26/2019

Tunnare, men blir den bättre av det? Det är en aning förvånande att ThinkPad T490s får ett nytt chassi då Lenovo gjorde om designen senast förra året. Det finns också andra förändringar, men alla är inte positiva. Vi har recenserat nya ThinkPad T490s med en Lågenergi-skärm på 1080p.

Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Processor
Intel Core i5-8265U
Grafikkort
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Kärna: 1100 MHz, Minne: 1200 MHz
Minne
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, Dubbla kanaler, fastlött
Skärm
14 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 157 PPI, B140HAN05.7, IPS, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Hårddisk
Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, 512 GB 
Ljudkort
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, 1 Dockningsstation, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD UHS-II, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare
Nätverk
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 16.1 x 329 x 225.8
Batteri
57 Wh Litiumjon
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo (2x1W), Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 65W USB-C-PSU, 36 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.27 kg, Strömförsörjning: 336 g
Pris
1259 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

332.6 mm 234 mm 19 mm 1.6 kg331 mm 227 mm 19 mm 1.4 kg331 mm 220.9 mm 17.9 mm 1.6 kg329 mm 227 mm 18.9 mm 1.5 kg329 mm 225.8 mm 16.1 mm 1.3 kg326 mm 234 mm 17.9 mm 1.5 kg323 mm 217 mm 15 mm 1.1 kg
ThinkPad T490s (Vänster) vs. ThinkPad T490 (Höger)
ThinkPad T490s (Vänster) vs. ThinkPad T490 (Höger)
ThinkPad T490s (Vänster) vs. ThinkPad T490 (Höger)
ThinkPad T490s (Vänster) vs. ThinkPad T490 (Höger)
ThinkPad T490s (Vänster) vs. ThinkPad T490 (Höger)
ThinkPad T490s (Vänster) vs. ThinkPad T490 (Höger)
ThinkPad T490s (Vänster) vs. ThinkPad T490 (Höger)
ThinkPad T490s (Vänster) vs. ThinkPad T490 (Höger)
Vänster: USB-C 3.1 (Gen1), Thunderbolt 3, LAN, USB 3.0, HDMI 1.4b, 3.5 mm stereoanslutning
Vänster: USB-C 3.1 (Gen1), Thunderbolt 3, LAN, USB 3.0, HDMI 1.4b, 3.5 mm stereoanslutning
Höger: SmartCard, USB 3.0, springa för säkerhetslås
Höger: SmartCard, USB 3.0, springa för säkerhetslås
Baksidan: Kortläsare för microSD och Nano-SIM
Baksidan: Kortläsare för microSD och Nano-SIM
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 7490
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
137.6 MB/s ∼100% +101%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.08 MB/s ∼59% +19%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.8 MB/s ∼53% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
68.3 MB/s ∼50%
Average of class Office
  (10.2 - 191, n=267)
60.7 MB/s ∼44% -11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 7490
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
203.2 MB/s ∼100% +131%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
87.8 MB/s ∼43%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.32 MB/s ∼43% -1%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.7 MB/s ∼41% -6%
Average of class Office
  (9.5 - 255, n=242)
77 MB/s ∼38% -12%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
650 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
648 MBit/s ∼100%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
644 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
624 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
620 MBit/s ∼95% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
540 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Average of class Office
  (5 - 688, n=210)
462 MBit/s ∼71% -29%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
667 MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
529 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
523 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
513 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
494 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
455 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Average of class Office
  (34 - 688, n=210)
437 MBit/s ∼66% -34%
414
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
379
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 414 cd/m² Medel: 389.4 cd/m² Minimum: 6 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 391 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1700:1 (Svärta: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 62.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
B140HAN05.7, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
NV140FHM-N46, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
NE140FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Lenovo LEN40A9 / AUO B140HAK02.3, , 1920x1080, 14
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
LG, LP140WF6-SPF1, , 1920x1080, 14
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
AUO3B3D, , 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 7490
AUO503D (D04YD_B140HAN), , 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
21%
-19%
36%
37%
25%
25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
61.6 (30.8, 30.8)
44 (26, 18)
29%
74 (33.6, 40.4)
-20%
40 (18, 22)
35%
39.2 (20.4, 18.8)
36%
42.4 (19.6, 22.8)
31%
41.6 (22, 19.6)
32%
Response Time Black / White *
38.8 (21.2, 17.6)
34 (18.8, 15.2)
12%
45.6 (22.8, 22.8)
-18%
25 (14, 11)
36%
24.4 (12.8, 11.6)
37%
31.6 (18, 13.6)
19%
32 (16.4, 15.6)
18%
PWM Frequency
990.1
2451 (50)
Screen
-82%
-24%
-0%
-12%
-33%
-37%
Brightness middle
391
288.3
-26%
418
7%
298
-24%
334
-15%
414
6%
308.6
-21%
Brightness
389
281
-28%
400
3%
287
-26%
313
-20%
387
-1%
294
-24%
Brightness Distribution
87
86
-1%
88
1%
91
5%
89
2%
87
0%
89
2%
Black Level *
0.23
0.21
9%
0.24
-4%
0.2
13%
0.41
-78%
0.25
-9%
0.23
-0%
Contrast
1700
1373
-19%
1742
2%
1490
-12%
815
-52%
1656
-3%
1342
-21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.4
6.16
-81%
4.7
-38%
2.19
36%
2.2
35%
5.5
-62%
6.07
-79%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.7
18.99
-304%
8.7
-85%
4.39
7%
5.7
-21%
9.9
-111%
10.58
-125%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.1
4.51
-310%
2.1
-91%
1.67
-52%
2.3
-109%
1.67
-52%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4
6.3
-58%
5.9
-48%
1.97
51%
2.9
27%
6.4
-60%
7.3
-83%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.517 87%
2.06 107%
2.43 91%
2.34 94%
2.31 95%
2.061 107%
CCT
6809 95%
6886 94%
7350 88%
6571 99%
6855 95%
7811 83%
7269 89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.4
37.67
-40%
59.9
-4%
62
-1%
65.3
5%
56.9
-9%
62
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.4
58.9
-40%
92.1
-5%
95
-2%
91.8
-6%
88.1
-10%
97
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-31% / -66%
-22% / -23%
18% / 5%
13% / -4%
-4% / -24%
-6% / -27%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 17.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
61.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 30.8 ms rise
↘ 30.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9524 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø584 (566.02-686.12)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø672 (635.4-707.09)
Fujitsu LifeBook U748 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø508 (501.47-546.37)
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø510 (500.33-582.81)
Dell Latitude 7490 Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel Core i5-8350U: Ø531 (519.92-595.49)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U; undervolted: Ø657 (651.36-692.5)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø606 (601.59-638.02)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel Core i5-8265U
162 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Core i5-8350U
153 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U
  (111 - 163, n=19)
153 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Core i5-8350U
150 Points ∼93% -7%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼89% -11%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Office
  (20 - 193, n=518)
111 Points ∼69% -31%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
716 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel Core i5-8265U
686 (min: 566.02, max: 686.12) Points ∼96%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Core i5-8350U
631 Points ∼88% -8%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U
  (483 - 750, n=21)
611 Points ∼85% -11%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel Core i5-8250U
583 Points ∼81% -15%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Core i5-8350U
569 Points ∼79% -17%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Core i5-8250U
553 Points ∼77% -19%
Average of class Office
  (36 - 1050, n=524)
336 Points ∼47% -51%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
686 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
56.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
162 Points
Hjälp
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø584 (566.02-686.12)
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U; Undervolting: Ø639 (620.19-749.93)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø705 (655.21-720.75)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U; undervolted: Ø708 (702.84-711.63)
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3210 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3082 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3024 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2620 - 3210, n=16)
2977 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
2911 Points ∼91% -9%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
2807 Points ∼87% -13%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2761 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Office
  (320 - 3884, n=135)
2598 Points ∼81% -19%
Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
6441 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5931 - 6556, n=16)
6234 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
6140 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6053 Points ∼94% -6%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
5844 Points ∼91% -9%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
5721 Points ∼89% -11%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5548 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Office
  (1266 - 7964, n=135)
5413 Points ∼84% -16%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
8361 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (7471 - 8395, n=16)
7893 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7805 Points ∼93% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
7799 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
7376 Points ∼88% -12%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
7139 Points ∼85% -15%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7099 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Office
  (2683 - 8992, n=135)
6874 Points ∼82% -18%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3985 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3573 - 3985, n=16)
3776 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3771 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3764 Points ∼94% -6%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
3564 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Office
  (803 - 4597, n=136)
3211 Points ∼81% -19%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
2429 Points ∼61% -39%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2364 Points ∼59% -41%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
4927 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
4906 Points ∼100% 0%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4832 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4302 - 4927, n=14)
4728 Points ∼96% -4%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4684 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
4600 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Office
  (1226 - 5428, n=336)
4006 Points ∼81% -19%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
4244 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
3723 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3690 Points ∼87% -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3672 Points ∼87% -13%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3652 Points ∼86% -14%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3542 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3150 - 4244, n=15)
3525 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Office
  (1169 - 4770, n=392)
3045 Points ∼72% -28%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4244 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5323 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4927 poäng
Hjälp
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Dell Latitude 7490
Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
Average Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-15%
-15%
18%
-27%
-56%
9%
Write 4K
122.03
105.8
-13%
116.4
-5%
135.5
11%
92.75
-24%
79.41
-35%
129 (121 - 144, n=3)
6%
Read 4K
45.56
40.79
-10%
45.75
0%
43.76
-4%
30.67
-33%
27.37
-40%
55.9 (45.6 - 63.5, n=3)
23%
Write Seq
1497.34
1204
-20%
455.1
-70%
1006
-33%
353.2
-76%
343.9
-77%
1495 (1491 - 1497, n=3)
0%
Read Seq
2385.23
1065
-55%
1818
-24%
1761
-26%
1937
-19%
472.7
-80%
2607 (2385 - 2760, n=3)
9%
Write 4K Q32T1
240.94
219.2
-9%
248.9
3%
659.7
174%
358
49%
206
-15%
279 (238 - 357, n=3)
16%
Read 4K Q32T1
338.03
304.3
-10%
358
6%
432.6
28%
253.1
-25%
188.3
-44%
385 (336 - 482, n=3)
14%
Write Seq Q32T1
1528.4
1267
-17%
1191
-22%
1231
-19%
359.6
-76%
343.3
-78%
1533 (1512 - 1558, n=3)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
2915
3303
13%
2755
-5%
3220
10%
2613
-10%
532.6
-82%
3030 (2915 - 3154, n=3)
4%
AS SSD
-12%
-80%
-13%
-128%
-81%
3%
Copy Game MB/s
548.82
309.25
917 (687 - 1147, n=2)
Copy Program MB/s
210.91
168.2
427 (418 - 437, n=2)
Copy ISO MB/s
732.8
319.17
1507 (1290 - 1725, n=2)
Score Total
2831
3048
8%
1443
-49%
2833
0%
1232
-56%
947
-67%
2879 (2712 - 3095, n=3)
2%
Score Write
1226
921
-25%
405
-67%
741
-40%
376
-69%
357
-71%
1158 (920 - 1328, n=3)
-6%
Score Read
1092
1435
31%
718
-34%
1405
29%
603
-45%
391
-64%
1168 (1092 - 1213, n=3)
7%
Access Time Write *
0.039
0.038
3%
0.144
-269%
0.025
36%
0.053
-36%
0.056
-44%
0.028 (0.021 - 0.039, n=3)
28%
Access Time Read *
0.033
0.055
-67%
0.108
-227%
0.052
-58%
0.321
-873%
0.112
-239%
0.035 (0.033 - 0.037, n=3)
-6%
4K-64 Write
927.31
706.33
-24%
195.84
-79%
515.79
-44%
248.31
-73%
248.06
-73%
854 (594 - 1041, n=3)
-8%
4K-64 Read
760.86
1183.23
56%
446.09
-41%
1202.89
58%
413.33
-46%
316.06
-58%
833 (761 - 873, n=3)
9%
4K Write
164.45
97.85
-40%
87.56
-47%
144.29
-12%
93.56
-43%
79.15
-52%
160 (140 - 175, n=3)
-3%
4K Read
65.58
42.09
-36%
35.67
-46%
45.42
-31%
29.01
-56%
26.66
-59%
65.3 (63.8 - 66.3, n=3)
0%
Seq Write
1341
1172.23
-13%
1219.53
-9%
804.5
-40%
338.97
-75%
294.93
-78%
1438 (1341 - 1511, n=3)
7%
Seq Read
2654
2093.95
-21%
2364.51
-11%
1569.48
-41%
1610.71
-39%
486.16
-82%
2695 (2654 - 2742, n=3)
2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-14% / -13%
-48% / -52%
3% / -0%
-78% / -86%
-69% / -70%
6% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
Sequential Read: 2635.9 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1492 MB/s
512K Read: 1501.2 MB/s
512K Write: 1018.78 MB/s
4K Read: 59.88 MB/s
4K Write: 125.75 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 343.21 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 249.63 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
3756 Points ∼100% +104%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3551 Points ∼95% +93%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1868 Points ∼50% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1839 Points ∼49%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1704 Points ∼45% -7%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 1979, n=150)
1703 Points ∼45% -7%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1653 Points ∼44% -10%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1648 Points ∼44% -10%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1593 Points ∼42% -13%
Average of class Office
  (185 - 5332, n=639)
1284 Points ∼34% -30%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
742 Points ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (76 - 1158, n=44)
473 Points ∼64%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (299 - 402, n=24)
348 Points ∼47%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
322 Points ∼43%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
317 Points ∼43%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
2807 Points ∼100% +110%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
2429 Points ∼87% +82%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1336 Points ∼48%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1283 Points ∼46% -4%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1399, n=119)
1115 Points ∼40% -17%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1009 Points ∼36% -24%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1001 Points ∼36% -25%
Average of class Office
  (138 - 4109, n=461)
995 Points ∼35% -26%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
994 Points ∼35% -26%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
17743 Points ∼100% +63%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
16111 Points ∼91% +48%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
10881 Points ∼61%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
10234 Points ∼58% -6%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11294, n=136)
9091 Points ∼51% -16%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
8181 Points ∼46% -25%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
8138 Points ∼46% -25%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
7943 Points ∼45% -27%
Average of class Office
  (1208 - 27117, n=508)
6900 Points ∼39% -37%
3DMark 11 Performance
2079 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
10155 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1217 poäng
Hjälp
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 58.735.330.510.3fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 17fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 8653.32219.5fps
Rocket League (2017) 90.537.524.7fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 31.119.317.4fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
29.4 / 29.4 / 30.9 dB(A)
Hög belastning
33.3 / 33.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 29.4 dB(A)
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
Noise
-2%
1%
-1%
-2%
1%
off / environment *
29.4
28.1
4%
30.25
-3%
29.3
-0%
28.8
2%
28.2
4%
Idle Minimum *
29.4
28.1
4%
30.25
-3%
29.3
-0%
28.8
2%
28.2
4%
Idle Average *
29.4
28.1
4%
30.25
-3%
29.3
-0%
28.8
2%
28.2
4%
Idle Maximum *
30.9
28.1
9%
30.25
2%
29.9
3%
33.1
-7%
28.7
7%
Load Average *
33.3
35.5
-7%
31.3
6%
32.5
2%
35.2
-6%
29.9
10%
Load Maximum *
33.3
41.5
-25%
31.3
6%
36.6
-10%
35.2
-6%
40.2
-21%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 31.8 °C42.9 °C42.4 °C 
 31.6 °C43.3 °C42.1 °C 
 24.6 °C27.4 °C27.8 °C 
Max: 43.3 °C
Medel: 34.9 °C
41.2 °C45.1 °C34.6 °C
38.1 °C41.2 °C30.8 °C
27.4 °C28 °C26.5 °C
Max: 45.1 °C
Medel: 34.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  32.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 19.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.3 °C / 0.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.331.72524.629.73128.330.54027.526.75025.125.56325.226.18023.125.410022.926.212521.726.116022.130.62002237.625021.340.63152146.640020.650.850020.255.363019.457.580018.961.5100018.360.1125017.959.3160017.160.1200016.760.6250016.261.2315016.158.6400015.850.1500015.652.3630015.453.7800015.5541000015.453.71250015.244.11600014.839.8SPL29.470.2N1.225.3median 17.9median 53.7Delta2.59.330.131.329.430.330.229.929.331.431.632.5262725.526.626.729.525.529.624.438.622.848.922.351.719.656.918.563.717.665.717.167.216.266.616.371.115.973.715.472.715.572.415.572.715.872.516.175.616.67916.877.417.271.317.471.817.467.217.35628.885.81.264.1median 17.2median 67.21.89.536.241.636.234.73734.734.633.634.634.434.234.433.233.533.23234.13232.233.932.240.130.440.144.229.244.247.729.447.749.427.649.454.227.454.256.226.856.256.725.856.757.425.757.459.925.159.964.824.564.868.324.468.362.724.262.767246766.923.966.968.924.168.964.42464.458.623.858.665.223.665.263.823.563.866.223.566.265.323.465.357.723.457.762.223.562.277.336.377.340.52.740.5median 62.2median 24.2median 62.25.81.45.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EADell Latitude 7490
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell Latitude 7490 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.31 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.27 / 0.58 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 2.62 / 5.16 / 8.7 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 40 / 64 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TFT-LCD, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 7490
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
5%
-8%
1%
-11%
22%
-9%
-67%
Idle Minimum *
2.62
3.1
-18%
4.7
-79%
3.33
-27%
3.2
-22%
2
24%
3.87 (1 - 12.4, n=158)
-48%
7.63 (2.34 - 32, n=953)
-191%
Idle Average *
5.16
6.4
-24%
7.3
-41%
6.9
-34%
6.6
-28%
4.7
9%
7.12 (4.3 - 15.5, n=158)
-38%
11.4 (4.2 - 42, n=953)
-121%
Idle Maximum *
8.7
9.4
-8%
9.4
-8%
8.2
6%
9.5
-9%
5.7
34%
8.99 (5.2 - 16.6, n=158)
-3%
13.9 (5 - 67, n=953)
-60%
Load Average *
40
29.8
25%
28
30%
29.4
26%
36.2
9%
38.4
4%
35.3 (12.9 - 51.6, n=158)
12%
37.2 (7.43 - 99.3, n=938)
7%
Load Maximum *
64
31.2
51%
28.2
56%
43.4
32%
65.6
-3%
38.9
39%
43.5 (22 - 79, n=158)
32%
45.8 (12.2 - 129, n=940)
28%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10tim 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13tim 54min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 39min
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Dell Latitude 7490
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
-11%
-2%
-27%
-7%
-10%
-26%
Reader / Idle
1468
937
1138
569 (101 - 1857, n=793)
H.264
834
657
-21%
397
-52%
399
-52%
425 (139 - 834, n=173)
-49%
WiFi v1.3
607
541
-11%
621
2%
390
-36%
447
-26%
548
-10%
410 (105 - 964, n=333)
-32%
Load
99
111
12%
106
7%
156
58%
101 (37 - 259, n=742)
2%

För

+ robust chassi av hög kvalitet
+ riktigt bra 1080p-skärm (matt, ljusstark, nästan fullständigt sRGB-omfång)
+ lång batteritid
+ utmärkt tangentbord
+ tyst drift
+ riktigt bra systemprestanda
+ redo för WWAN
+ 3 års garanti

Emot

- sämre möjligheter till underhåll (RAM, WiFi, tangentbord)
- sämre kylning än T480s
- har inte längre dedikerad GPU
- sämre CPU-prestanda än sin föregångare
- skärmen har långsamma responstider
- har bara microSD-kortläsare som dessutom är besvärligt placerad
- fläkten reagerar snabbt på belastning, särskilt när nätadaptern är ansluten
Recenseras: Lenovo ThinkPad T490s. Recensionsex från
Recenseras: Lenovo ThinkPad T490s. Recensionsex från

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Vi håller det kort den här gången: ThinkPad T490s är en riktigt bra företagslaptop och med den nya skärmen är den ett av de bästa alternativen som finns för tillfället. Campus-varianten som bara kostar 12.590 kronor är dessutom ett riktigt kap.

Vi skulle kunna avsluta vårt omdöme där, men situationen är en aning mer komplex när man jämför ThinkPad T490s med sin föregångare och Lenovos andra bärbara datorer på 14 tum. Om vi tar en titt på det nuvarande utbudet av högkvalitativa företagsmodeller ser vi att de olika serierna är mer lika varandra än någonsin tidigare. Detta inkluderar T490, T490s, X1 Carbon samt nya X390, som till och med har samma moderkort som T490s. Det finns förstås en del skillnader, men som konsument får man fyra i princip identiska system så länge man tittar på likvärdigt utrustade varianter, och då har vi inte ens inkluderat konkurrerande modeller från andra tillverkare.

Tidigare har T4x0s-modellerna oftast varit tunnare versioner av T4x0, som vanligen hade bättre komponenter och inte hamnade efter i fråga om prestanda. Detta har ändrats i och med T490s. Det nya chassit är förvisso lyckat och kvaliteten är också ett steg upp jämfört med vanliga T490, men T490s hamnar efter när det kommer till prestanda. Detta inkluderar förstås grafikkortet, för det finns inte längre något alternativ för en dedikerad GPU, men det gäller också processorns prestanda. Den sistnämnda lider av en mindre kraftfull kyllösning och föregångaren var till och med en aning snabbare.

ThinkPad T490s är i vårt tycke snarare en billig version av X1 Carbon (eller en X1 Carbon Lite). Den är en aning större och tyngre men har liknande prestandasiffror och en identisk design på tangentbordet. Tangentbordet är förresten på samma nivå som på den dyrare X1 Carbon och är subjektivt sett en aning bättre än det som sitter i T490 eller i konkurrerande modeller från Dell, Fujitsu eller HP. T490s har en portsituation som också påminner oss om X1 Carbon, vilket inkluderar den svårnådda microSD-läsaren.

Vi uppskattade de extra skärmalternativen och den matta Lågenergi-skärmen på 1080p som vi recenserat lämnade ett gott intryck, dock med undantag för de långsamma responstiderna. Vi tror att det kommer vara det populäraste skärmalternativet för både T490s och den ordinarie T490. Den har riktigt bra ljusstyrka, bildkvaliteten drar nytta av det höga kontrastförhållandet och innehållet är inte grynigt trots den matta ytan. Skärmen täcker dessutom det mindre sRGB-omfånget och den har riktigt låg nivå av färgavvikelser, särskilt efter kalibrering. Detta innebär att skärmen även passar bra till en del bildbehandling – T490s hade kanske till och med varit ett intressant alternativ för fotografer om den bara hade haft en SD-kortläsare i full storlek.

Tunnare chassi, bättre skärm, bättre tangentbord, längre batteritid – lägre CPU-prestanda, ingen dedikerad GPU, kompromisser när det gäller portar och kraftigt begränsade servicemöjligheter. Beroende på dina förväntningar kommer T490s antingen vara utmärkt eller en stor besvikelse.

T490s är för tillfället bättre än sina rivaler, för det är helt enkelt ett riktigt komplett paket i kategorin för kontors/företagsenheter. Den har en del brister, men många av dem står i relation till den föregående modellen och konkurrenterna är heller inte perfekta. Vi ger därför T490s vår utmärkelse Redaktörens Val. Konkurrenterna kommer också att uppdatera sina serier under de kommande veckorna, så rankingen kan snart komma att ändras. Lenovo kommer troligen stå för rejäl konkurrens med sina kommande AMD-motsvarigheter.

Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 - 05/15/2019 v6
Andreas Osthoff

Design
91 / 98 → 93%
Tangentbord
95%
Mus
91%
Anslutningar
74 / 80 → 93%
Vikt
72 / 20-67 → 100%
Batteri
94%
Skärm
91%
Spelprestanda
60 / 68 → 88%
Programprestanda
89 / 92 → 97%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
91%
Audio
68%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Medel
81%
92%
Office - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Lenovo ThinkPad T490s (i5, Lågenergi-FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Andreas Osthoff, 2019-05-26 (Update: 2019-05-26)