Notebookcheck

Test: Lenovo ThinkPad E485 (Ryzen 5, Vega 8) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 04/17/2019

Begränsas den medvetet? Utöver A-serien har Lenovo också den billigare E-serien med processorer från AMD. Vi testar hur denna ThinkPad står sig mot den Intel-baserade konkurrensen och utvärderar huruvida en konfiguration med dualkanals-RAM för med sig några fördelar. Uppdatering: Ytterligare mätningar för den alternativa Innolux-skärmen.

Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Grafikkort
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, Kärna: 1100 MHz, Minne: 1200 MHz
Minne
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2400, Enkel kanal, max. 64 GB
Skärm
14 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 157 PPI, B140HAN04.2, IPS, glansig: nej
Moderkort
AMD CZ FCH
Hårddisk
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
Ljudkort
AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168B/8111B (10/100/1000MBit), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 21.9 x 329 x 242
Batteri
45 Wh Litiumjon, 3 celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: nej, 65W USB C-laddare, 12 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.812 kg, Strömförsörjning: 356 g
Pris
650 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

340 mm 240 mm 20.9 mm 1.7 kg339 mm 242 mm 21 mm 1.8 kg329 mm 242 mm 21.9 mm 1.8 kg329 mm 242 mm 19.9 mm 1.8 kg324.2 mm 237.7 mm 18 mm 1.6 kg
Vänster: USB-C 3.1 Gen.2 (med alternativt DisplayPort-läge), HDMI 1.4b, 2x USB 3.0 Gen.1 (1x med strömförsörjning), 3.5 mm ljud
Vänster: USB-C 3.1 Gen.2 (med alternativt DisplayPort-läge), HDMI 1.4b, 2x USB 3.0 Gen.1 (1x med strömförsörjning), 3.5 mm ljud
Höger: microSD-kortläsare, USB 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet, plats för säkerhetslås
Höger: microSD-kortläsare, USB 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet, plats för säkerhetslås
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77.1 MB/s ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.1 MB/s ∼99% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.8 MB/s ∼96%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
64.8 MB/s ∼84% -12%
Average of class Office
  (10.2 - 191, n=256)
60.8 MB/s ∼79% -18%
Dell Latitude 3490
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.6 MB/s ∼31% -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
87.3 MB/s ∼100% +5%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
85.6 MB/s ∼98% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.8 MB/s ∼95%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.9 MB/s ∼94% -1%
Average of class Office
  (9.5 - 255, n=231)
77.4 MB/s ∼89% -7%
Dell Latitude 3490
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.4 MB/s ∼28% -71%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
636 MBit/s ∼100% +109%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
633 MBit/s ∼100% +108%
Dell Latitude 3490
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
580 (99th percentile: 584) MBit/s ∼91% +91%
Average of class Office
  (5 - 688, n=198)
465 MBit/s ∼73% +53%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
306 MBit/s ∼48% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
304 MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
670 MBit/s ∼100% +102%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
614 MBit/s ∼92% +85%
Dell Latitude 3490
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
536 (99th percentile: 538) MBit/s ∼80% +61%
Average of class Office
  (34 - 688, n=198)
437 MBit/s ∼65% +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
332 MBit/s ∼50%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
300 MBit/s ∼45% -10%
252
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
264
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 289 cd/m² Medel: 270.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.1 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 289 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1521:1 (Svärta: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 4.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 37.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 1.96
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
B140HAN04.2, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
Innolux N140HCA-EAC, , 1920x1080, 14
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
Innolux N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 3490
LP140WF6 / LGD059D, , 1920x1080, 14
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
LG Philips, LGD05F1, , 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
4%
25%
24%
13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44.8 (20.4, 24.4)
44.8 (23.6, 21.2)
-0%
33 (14, 19)
26%
36.4 (18.8, 17.6)
19%
41.6 (22.8, 18.8)
7%
Response Time Black / White *
33.6 (18, 15.6)
31.2 (17.2, 14)
7%
26 (16, 10)
23%
24 (13.2, 10.8)
29%
27.2 (15.6, 11.6)
19%
PWM Frequency
25000 (30)
100 (30)
Screen
-20%
-27%
-12%
-12%
Brightness middle
289
262
-9%
225
-22%
250
-13%
256
-11%
Brightness
271
245
-10%
209
-23%
241
-11%
238
-12%
Brightness Distribution
87
83
-5%
89
2%
81
-7%
85
-2%
Black Level *
0.19
0.19
-0%
0.68
-258%
0.25
-32%
0.23
-21%
Contrast
1521
1379
-9%
331
-78%
1000
-34%
1113
-27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.6
7
-25%
4.54
19%
5.5
2%
6.2
-11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
20.8
23.6
-13%
7.2
65%
23.5
-13%
18.2
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.7
2.87
39%
4.8
-2%
5.2
-11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
6.4
-137%
4.14
-53%
3.5
-30%
3.8
-41%
Gamma
1.96 112%
2.14 103%
2.13 103%
2.27 97%
2.5 88%
CCT
6506 100%
6065 107%
6624 98%
7049 92%
6643 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37.2
39.5
6%
39
5%
37.9
2%
36.1
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58.5
61.9
6%
61
4%
59.4
2%
56.9
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-8% / -16%
-1% / -19%
6% / -7%
1% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9618 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

197
cd/m²
212
cd/m²
204
cd/m²
195
cd/m²
221
cd/m²
201
cd/m²
167
cd/m²
184
cd/m²
164
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 221 cd/m² Medel: 193.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.5 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 74 %
Mitt på batteriet: 168 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1163:1 (Svärta: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.67 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 4.3
ΔE Greyscale 3.81 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
62% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
LatencyMon - WLAN aktiverat
LatencyMon - WLAN aktiverat
LatencyMon - WLAN avstängt
LatencyMon - WLAN avstängt
 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
Intel Core i7-8565U
180 Points ∼100% +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼80% +3%
Dell Latitude 3490
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼79% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
139.52 Points ∼78%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
139 Points ∼77% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
  (124 - 142, n=14)
136 Points ∼76% -3%
Average of class Office
  (20 - 181, n=506)
110 Points ∼61% -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 3490
Intel Core i5-8250U
646 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
618 (min: 591.81, max: 618.71) Points ∼96%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
  (510 - 642, n=15)
597 Points ∼92% -3%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
Intel Core i7-8565U
593 (min: 540, max: 585.81) Points ∼92% -4%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
589 Points ∼91% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
Intel Core i5-8250U
540 Points ∼84% -13%
Average of class Office
  (36 - 1050, n=511)
330 Points ∼51% -47%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP: Ø598 (591.81-618.71)
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G: Ø507 (502.8-539.23)
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G: Ø510 (500.53-589.09)
Dell Latitude 3490 UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix SC311 M.2: Ø596 (586.36-637.92)
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G: Ø535 (519.49-572.2)
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
139.52 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
618 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
51.47 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.99 %
Hjälp
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 16384
5160 Points ∼100% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 8192
4870 Points ∼94%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, 4096
4849 Points ∼94% 0%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, 8192
4647 Points ∼90% -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (3437 - 4870, n=10)
4187 Points ∼81% -14%
Average of class Office
  (1226 - 5428, n=325)
3986 Points ∼77% -18%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 16384
5124 Points ∼100% +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, 4096
4618 Points ∼90% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 8192
4249 Points ∼83%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (3126 - 4249, n=5)
3676 Points ∼72% -13%
Average of class Office
  (869 - 5740, n=238)
3365 Points ∼66% -21%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 3490
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, 8192
4458 Points ∼100% +26%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 16384
4071 Points ∼91% +15%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, 8192
3594 Points ∼81% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, 4096
3574 Points ∼80% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 8192
3550 Points ∼80%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (3049 - 3550, n=13)
3341 Points ∼75% -6%
Average of class Office
  (1169 - 4458, n=381)
3033 Points ∼68% -15%
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 16384
3076 Points ∼100% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 8192
3014 Points ∼98%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (2351 - 3363, n=11)
2940 Points ∼96% -2%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, 8192
2924 Points ∼95% -3%
Dell Latitude 3490
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, 8192
2909 Points ∼95% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, 4096
2680 Points ∼87% -11%
Average of class Office
  (320 - 3884, n=124)
2577 Points ∼84% -14%
Productivity
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 16384
7230 Points ∼100% +46%
Dell Latitude 3490
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, 8192
5930 Points ∼82% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, 4096
5555 Points ∼77% +12%
Average of class Office
  (1266 - 7964, n=124)
5400 Points ∼75% +9%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, 8192
5235 Points ∼72% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 8192
4964 Points ∼69%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (3113 - 5574, n=11)
4510 Points ∼62% -9%
Essentials
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 16384
7897 Points ∼100% +19%
Dell Latitude 3490
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, 8192
7458 Points ∼94% +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, 4096
6999 Points ∼89% +5%
Average of class Office
  (2683 - 8992, n=124)
6838 Points ∼87% +3%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, 8192
6825 Points ∼86% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 8192
6646 Points ∼84%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (5288 - 7247, n=11)
6411 Points ∼81% -4%
Score
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 16384
4015 Points ∼100% +21%
Dell Latitude 3490
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, 8192
3619 Points ∼90% +9%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, 8192
3376 Points ∼84% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 8192
3321 Points ∼83%
Average of class Office
  (803 - 4597, n=125)
3188 Points ∼79% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (2501 - 3685, n=11)
3144 Points ∼78% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, 4096
2279 Points ∼57% -31%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3550 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4249 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4870 poäng
Hjälp
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Dell Latitude 3490
SK hynix SC311 M.2
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
Average Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
 
AS SSD
-82%
-47%
-45%
-2%
-59%
Score Total
2478
638
-74%
1290
-48%
1006
-59%
2040
-18%
2565 (35 - 4653, n=61)
4%
Score Write
575
182
-68%
323
-44%
387
-33%
669
16%
587 (48 - 1029, n=61)
2%
Score Read
1277
324
-75%
638
-50%
409
-68%
954
-25%
1378 (363 - 2545, n=61)
8%
Access Time Write *
0.059
0.235
-298%
0.063
-7%
0.052
12%
0.047
20%
0.4637 (0.023 - 4.15, n=61)
-686%
Access Time Read *
0.054
0.106
-96%
0.144
-167%
0.097
-80%
0.067
-24%
0.0678 (0.04 - 0.49, n=61)
-26%
4K-64 Write
371.47
92.05
-75%
215.98
-42%
286.06
-23%
499.48
34%
419 (15.3 - 1652, n=61)
13%
4K-64 Read
1035.25
190.92
-82%
433.3
-58%
332.74
-68%
724.27
-30%
1112 (199 - 2280, n=61)
7%
4K Write
63.94
78.86
23%
76.83
20%
68.86
8%
119.73
87%
91.6 (1.16 - 161, n=61)
43%
4K Read
38.63
31.13
-19%
25.35
-34%
27.67
-28%
31.17
-19%
45.1 (20.7 - 54.1, n=61)
17%
Seq Write
1395
115.38
-92%
305.23
-78%
318.83
-77%
493.65
-65%
960 (223 - 1395, n=61)
-31%
Seq Read
2030
1014.73
-50%
1797.34
-11%
484.68
-76%
1982.61
-2%
2019 (768 - 2834, n=61)
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1667.8 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1423.2 MB/s
512K Read: 1011.26 MB/s
512K Write: 870.77 MB/s
4K Read: 43.49 MB/s
4K Write: 75.56 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 283.41 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 205.64 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 16384
3756 Points ∼100% +36%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (1668 - 4317, n=19)
3265 Points ∼87% +18%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, 8192
2954 Points ∼79% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 8192
2757 Points ∼73%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U, 16384
1815 Points ∼48% -34%
Dell Latitude 3490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U, 8192
1634 Points ∼44% -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U, 4096
1518 Points ∼40% -45%
Average of class Office
  (185 - 5332, n=628)
1266 Points ∼34% -54%
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 16384
2429 Points ∼100% +47%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (1095 - 2901, n=17)
2072 Points ∼85% +26%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, 8192
1775 Points ∼73% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 8192
1647 Points ∼68%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U, 16384
1191 Points ∼49% -28%
Average of class Office
  (138 - 4109, n=451)
977 Points ∼40% -41%
Dell Latitude 3490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U, 8192
956 Points ∼39% -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U, 4096
882 Points ∼36% -46%
3DMark 11 Performance
2807 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7035 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1469 poäng
Hjälp
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000
8250U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 8192
22.35 fps ∼100% +69%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, 16384
19.5 fps ∼87% +47%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (7.6 - 20, n=13)
16.1 fps ∼72% +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, 8192
13.26 fps ∼59%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
PRO 2500U, Vega 8, 8192
12.7 fps ∼57% -4%
Average of class Office
  (1.8 - 54.8, n=233)
10.5 fps ∼47% -21%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 16384
8.2 fps ∼37% -38%
Dell Latitude 3490
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 8192
7.66 fps ∼34% -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 4096
6.8 fps ∼30% -49%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, 16384
14.8 fps ∼100% +37%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (5.9 - 15.4, n=10)
12.2 fps ∼82% +13%
Average of class Office
  (4.2 - 32.9, n=60)
11.7 fps ∼79% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, 8192
10.8 fps ∼73%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
PRO 2500U, Vega 8, 8192
10.6 fps ∼72% -2%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 16384
6.9 fps ∼47% -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 4096
5.9 fps ∼40% -45%
1024x768 Lowest Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, 16384
47.2 fps ∼100% +55%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (27.7 - 49.3, n=9)
37.4 fps ∼79% +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, 8192
30.4 fps ∼64%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
PRO 2500U, Vega 8, 8192
29.9 fps ∼63% -2%
Average of class Office
  (6.2 - 111, n=103)
27.3 fps ∼58% -10%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 16384
20.6 fps ∼44% -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 4096
16.9 fps ∼36% -44%
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 74.413.26fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 30.410.8fps
Doom (2016) 25.110.4fps
Civilization VI (2016) 56.312.4fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 26.59.1fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
29.4 / 29.4 / 31.2 dB(A)
Hög belastning
32.7 / 35.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 29.4 dB(A)
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Dell Latitude 3490
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix SC311 M.2
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
Noise
2%
-4%
-7%
2%
off / environment *
29.4
29.1
1%
30.8
-5%
29.8
-1%
29.4
-0%
Idle Minimum *
29.4
29.1
1%
30.8
-5%
29.8
-1%
29.4
-0%
Idle Average *
29.4
29.1
1%
30.8
-5%
29.8
-1%
29.4
-0%
Idle Maximum *
31.2
30.3
3%
30.8
1%
29.8
4%
30.2
3%
Load Average *
32.7
31.8
3%
34.7
-6%
39.1
-20%
31.8
3%
Load Maximum *
35.3
33.8
4%
36.4
-3%
44.3
-25%
33.1
6%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 37 °C38.2 °C42.3 °C 
 33.5 °C33.9 °C33.8 °C 
 24.5 °C24.8 °C25.2 °C 
Max: 42.3 °C
Medel: 32.6 °C
43.2 °C45.2 °C38 °C
37.6 °C39 °C39.8 °C
24.3 °C24.7 °C24 °C
Max: 45.2 °C
Medel: 35.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  33.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 19.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.7 °C / 78.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+2.5 °C / 4.5 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.928.22526.527.13128.4314023.727.55025.924.56322.424.38021.923.310022.22212521.521.916021.227.120021.734.325021.442.131520.647.640020.350.350020.151.263019.450.980018.957.3100018.560.7125018.156.7160017.156.5200017.163.2250016.362.831501660.440001654500015.754.4630015.651.9800015.554.41000015.555.61250015.354.31600015.245.7SPL29.470.5N1.224.8median 18.1median 54Delta2.46.934.834.227.228.131.531.928.630.624.529.824.333.92227.325.525.923.628.924.542.122.55123.254.221.955.620.859.720.560.619.460.11962.118.265.217.470.21765.416.563.116.26315.668.115.767.415.669.515.467.515.557.315.358.215.253.914.950.429.478.11.341.6median 17.4median 60.13.46.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGEHP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.43 / 0.57 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 6.2 / 8.6 / 9.7 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 37.4 / 44.8 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 3490
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
 
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
29%
-9%
8%
24%
-1%
-21%
Idle Minimum *
6.2
3.5
44%
7.2
-16%
3.2
48%
2.98
52%
5.91 (4.5 - 7.6, n=16)
5%
7.68 (0.77 - 32, n=940)
-24%
Idle Average *
8.6
5.3
38%
9.7
-13%
5.5
36%
5.4
37%
8.7 (6.9 - 12.9, n=16)
-1%
11.5 (4.2 - 42, n=940)
-34%
Idle Maximum *
9.7
6.1
37%
10.3
-6%
8.1
16%
7.9
19%
10.4 (8.1 - 13.7, n=16)
-7%
13.9 (5 - 67, n=940)
-43%
Load Average *
37.4
30
20%
42
-12%
40.8
-9%
34.5
8%
38.2 (24.1 - 45.7, n=16)
-2%
37.3 (7.43 - 99.3, n=925)
-0%
Load Maximum *
44.8
42.3
6%
44.2
1%
68.1
-52%
43.3
3%
43.9 (26.5 - 57.1, n=16)
2%
45.9 (12.2 - 129, n=927)
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
9tim 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 41)
5tim 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5tim 41min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 05min
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, 45 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
PRO 2500U, Vega 8, 48 Wh
Dell Latitude 3490
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
61%
1%
115%
78%
27%
Reader / Idle
545
1106
103%
560
3%
1024
88%
565 (101 - 1857, n=784)
4%
H.264
341
431
26%
253
-26%
458
34%
421 (139 - 834, n=164)
23%
WiFi v1.3
323
495
53%
290
-10%
694
115%
504
56%
408 (105 - 964, n=321)
26%
Load
65
105
62%
88
35%
151
132%
101 (37 - 259, n=731)
55%

För

+ robust hölje
+ utmärkt tangentbord
+ skaplig IPS-skärm
+ behagligt tyst
+ bra systemprestanda
+ lågt instegspris

Emot

- inget bakgrundsbelyst tangentbord (inte ens som tillval)
- endast microSD-kortläsare
- AMD-processorn används inte till sin fulla potential
- endast enkelkanals-RAM som standard
- på en del ställen används billigare material än på de liknande E480/E490
- endast 12 månaders garanti
Recension av Lenovo ThinkPad E485. Recensionsex från campuspoint.
Recension av Lenovo ThinkPad E485. Recensionsex från campuspoint.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

ThinkPad E485 lämnar ett aningen blandat intryck. Om vi tittar på enheten försig är det en gedigen företagslaptop på instegsnivå med ett robust hölje, en skaplig skärm och utmärkta inmatningsenheter. Men om du jämför den med ThinkPad E480, som är tänkt att vara samma modell fast med en Intel-processor, så finns det flera skillnader. Vi pratar i huvudsak om att den saknar ett bakgrundsbelyst tangentbord, vilket inte ens finns som tillval, samt att plastmaterialet på basenhetens ovansida är av aningen sämre kvalitet. Ibland får vi känslan av att tillverkarna vill ha en artificiell distans från Intel-modellerna.

Å andra sidan, ThinkPad E485 har förstås ett lägre pris och de flesta användare bör kunna leva med materialskillnaderna. Ett annat problem rör otur med utrustningen. Även om alla vet att den inbyggda AMD GPU:n drar stor nytta av RAM med dubbla kanaler så kommer tyvärr alla förkonfigurerade modeller med bara en enda RAM-modul. Även om det är ganska lätt att uppgradera så bör 8 GB vara tillräckligt för de flesta användare och mer RAM kostar dessutom mer. Det hade varit bättre om Lenovo från början istället hade byggt in två moduler på 4 GB. Men det största problemet är nog den högre energiförbrukningen som leder till mycket kortare batteritid. Huruvida detta bara beror på bristande optimering eller på att AMD:s plattform helt enkelt drar mer energi är en helt annan fråga.

En missad chans: Jämfört med dess Intel-syskon så visar ThinkPad E485 upp en del svagheter som inte har något att göra med AMD-processorn. Som exempel förstår vi inte varför den som skaffar E485 behöver klara sig utan ett bakgrundsbelyst tangentbord. Men den som kan leva med detta och en kortare batteritid får en riktigt gedigen instegsenhet till att attraktivt pris i form av ThinkPad E485.

ThinkPad E485 har också en hel uppsättning fördelar som inte är självklara i det här prisskiktet. Processorn har mer än tillräckligt med prestanda för de flesta uppgifter och tack vare en snabb SSD-enhet från Samsung kan du se fram mot ett riktigt responsivt system vid vardagsanvändning. Dessutom har den en skaplig IPS-skärm (men det kan eventuellt finnas några mindre skillnader beroende på leverantör). För det här låga priset kan vi hursomhelst rekommendera E485.

Uppdatering: Tyvärr visar sig den alternativa Innolux-skärmen vara mycket sämre i våra tester än modellen från AU Optronics, i synnerhet när det kommer till ljusstyrka. Med den alternativa panelen sjunker den totala poängsumman från 86.4% till 85.8%. Tyvärr har du ingen möjlighet att påverka vilken panelvariant som är inbyggd när du köper enheten, så du får stå ut med Lenovos skärmlotteri.

Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE - 04/05/2019 v6
Andreas Osthoff

Design
85 / 98 → 86%
Tangentbord
88%
Mus
88%
Anslutningar
51 / 80 → 63%
Vikt
65 / 20-67 → 96%
Batteri
84%
Skärm
85%
Spelprestanda
63 / 68 → 93%
Programprestanda
89 / 92 → 97%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
96%
Audio
64%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Medel
76%
86%
Office - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Lenovo ThinkPad E485 (Ryzen 5, Vega 8) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Andreas Osthoff, 2019-04-17 (Update: 2019-04-17)