Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Honor View 20 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 492 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1230:1 (Svärta: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.06
| Honor View 20 LTPS, 2310x1080, 6.40 | Honor View 10 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99 | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 OLED, 2340x1080, 6.39 | ZTE Axon 9 Pro AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21 | OnePlus 6T Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41 | Google Pixel 3 XL AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.30 | Huawei Mate 20 TFT-LCD (IPS), 2244x1080, 6.53 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 9% | 28% | 1% | 7% | -3% | 26% | |
| Brightness middle | 492 | 530 8% | 599 22% | 521 6% | 437 -11% | 410 -17% | 782 59% |
| Brightness | 475 | 523 10% | 593 25% | 517 9% | 442 -7% | 413 -13% | 784 65% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 88 -6% | 96 2% | 96 2% | 95 1% | 97 3% | 94 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.35 12% | 0.36 10% | ||||
| Contrast | 1230 | 1514 23% | 2172 77% | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.4 -0% | 1.4 42% | 2.9 -21% | 2.21 8% | 3.16 -32% | 2.3 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.2 | 5.5 -6% | 3.2 38% | 5.5 -6% | 4.27 18% | 5.5 -6% | 7 -35% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 2.2 31% | 2 37% | 2.7 16% | 2.1 34% | 1.7 47% | 2.4 25% |
| Gamma | 2.06 107% | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.01 109% | 2.307 95% | 2.219 99% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 7125 91% | 6598 99% | 6496 100% | 6288 103% | 6353 102% | 6653 98% | 6839 95% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 31 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 20 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
| ZTE Axon 9 Pro | |
| OnePlus 6T | |
| Google Pixel 3 XL | |
| Huawei Mate 20 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (268359 - 322616, n=10) | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor View 20 | |
| Honor View 10 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | |
| ZTE Axon 9 Pro | |
| OnePlus 6T | |
| Google Pixel 3 XL | |
| Huawei Mate 20 | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (245662 - 254229, n=9) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (93.2 - 109.9, n=9) | |
| OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
| Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70) | |
| ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71) | |
| Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (20618 - 23285, n=10) | |
| OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
| Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70) | |
| ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71) | |
| Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
| Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70) | |
| ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
| OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1948 - 3098, n=10) | |
| Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (86 - 124, n=10) | |
| Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70) | |
| Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80) | |
| Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (228 - 334, n=5) | |
| Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
| OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70) | |
| Honor View 10 (Chrome 63) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor View 20 | Honor View 10 | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 | ZTE Axon 9 Pro | OnePlus 6T | Google Pixel 3 XL | Huawei Mate 20 | Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -7% | -36% | -34% | -33% | -17% | -4% | 11% | 141% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 847 | 810 -4% | 675 -20% | 719 -15% | 735 -13% | 633 -25% | 840 -1% | 826 ? -2% | 1505 ? 78% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 250.1 | 194.3 -22% | 206.8 -17% | 196.4 -21% | 204.4 -18% | 228.6 -9% | 196.7 -21% | 358 ? 43% | 1112 ? 345% |
| Random Read 4KB | 168.9 | 144.3 -15% | 133.2 -21% | 141.3 -16% | 138.5 -18% | 120.8 -28% | 157.9 -7% | 166.6 ? -1% | 247 ? 46% |
| Random Write 4KB | 138.9 | 160 15% | 19.54 -86% | 22.52 -84% | 22 -84% | 132.7 -4% | 158.1 14% | 141.5 ? 2% | 271 ? 95% |
PUBG Mobile
Real Racing 3
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Honor View 20 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Mate 20 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 3 XL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (124.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.02 / 0.27 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.97 / 2.58 / 2.63 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
5.24 / 8.73 Watt |
    
| |
| Honor View 20 4000 mAh | Honor View 10 3750 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh | ZTE Axon 9 Pro 4000 mAh | OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh | Google Pixel 3 XL 3430 mAh | Huawei Mate 20 4000 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | 43% | 20% | 26% | 19% | 10% | 14% | 18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.97 | 1.05 -8% | 0.49 49% | 0.86 11% | 0.7 28% | 0.7 28% | 0.69 29% | 0.802 ? 17% | 0.897 ? 8% |
| Idle Average * | 2.58 | 2.36 9% | 0.67 74% | 1.1 57% | 1.1 57% | 1.4 46% | 2.28 12% | 2.07 ? 20% | 1.452 ? 44% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.63 | 2.41 8% | 0.87 67% | 1.21 54% | 2.1 20% | 2 24% | 2.52 4% | 2.38 ? 10% | 1.629 ? 38% |
| Load Average * | 5.24 | 4.93 6% | 3.64 31% | 5.02 4% | 4.2 20% | 4.8 8% | 5.21 1% | 4.87 ? 7% | 5.55 ? -6% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.73 | 9.04 -4% | 9.04 -4% | 10.82 -24% | 8.3 5% | 9.5 -9% | 8.49 3% | 7.46 ? 15% | 8.31 ? 5% |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor View 20 4000 mAh | Honor View 10 3750 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh | ZTE Axon 9 Pro 4000 mAh | OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh | Google Pixel 3 XL 3430 mAh | Huawei Mate 20 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -5% | -14% | -32% | 1% | -7% | 7% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1928 | 1671 -13% | 1810 -6% | 1936 0% | 1725 -11% | 1892 -2% | |
| H.264 | 932 | 819 -12% | 836 -10% | 903 -3% | 724 -22% | 1030 11% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 969 | 679 -30% | 719 -26% | 661 -32% | 865 -11% | 691 -29% | 885 -9% |
| Load | 222 | 305 37% | 194 -13% | 261 18% | 299 35% | 287 29% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Honor View 20 är en utmärkt flaggskepps-utmanare. Den är inte lika prisvärd som Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, men den finns tillgänglig i Europa och är Widevine Level 1 DRM-certifierad, vilket innebär att du kan strömma HD-innehåll från tjänster som Amazon Video, Google Play Video och Netflix.
Om du inte behöver tänka på budgeten rekommenderar vi att du överväger View 20, för den kombinerar elegansen från dyrare flaggskepp men har ändå mycket att ge. Kirin 980 placerar den på samma nivå som de dyrare modellerna Mate 20 och Mate 20 Pro samtidigt som den kan hålla takten med konkurrenter som drivs av Snapdragon 845. Vidare har den utmärkta kameror och ett större "skärm till kropp"-förhållande än de flesta moderna flaggskeppsenheter.
Honor View 20 är en fantastisk smartphone med en utmärkt kamera, framsynt design och tillräckligt med prestanda för att matcha de allra kraftfullaste moderna flaggskeppen.
Att den har USB 3.1, 8 GB RAM, 256 GB intern lagring, en hörlursanslutning, en IR-sensor och dual-SIM är också välkommet. Kom ihåg att få andra flaggskepp har alla dessa funktioner, särskilt inte de sista tre.
View 20 har dock sina svagheter, men de bleknar i jämförelse med den långa listan över positiva egenskaper. Totalt sett levererar Honor en flaggskepps-telefon till ett rimligt pris som står ut från den mer väletablerade massan.
Honor View 20
-
02/07/2019 v6(old)
Inge Schwabe
Pricecompare
