Notebookcheck

Test: Huawei P9 Plus (sammanfattning)

Andreas Osthoff, 08/13/2016

Är allt bättre med Plus? Nya P9 Plus från Huawei är inte bara större version av P9, utan har även en helt annorlunda skärm. Press Touch-funktionen är också unik för Plus-modellen.

Huawei P9 Plus (P9 Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 955 2.5 GHz
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-T880 MP4
Minne
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Skärm
5.5 tum 16:9, 1920x1080 pixlar 401 PPI, kapacitiv pekskärm, 10 punkter, AMOLED, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: headset, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 128 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhet, rotation, accelerometer och G-sensor, digital kompass, stegräknare, USB-OTG, WiFi-Direct, Miracast
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G GSM(850/900/1800/1900MHz), 3G UMTS (800/850/900/1900/2100 MHz), LTE Cat.6 (Band 1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/28), LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 6.98 x 152.3 x 75.3
Batteri
3400 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Leica dubbelkamera, Summarit-H 27 mm f/2.2 ASPH, BSI CMOS, 2-tons LED-blixt, Full-HD-video)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.4)
Övrigt
Högtalare: stereo, Tangentbord: virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Adapter (10 Watt), USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, headset, skyddsfodral, EMUI 4.1, Phone Manager, HiCare, Health, Designs, Mirror, Compass, Recorder, Memo, 36 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
162 g, Strömförsörjning: 74 g
Pris
699 Kr

 

Huawei P9 Plus: overview
Huawei P9 Plus: overview
Huawei P9 Plus: crossing
Huawei P9 Plus: crossing
Huawei P9 Plus: turning point
Huawei P9 Plus: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: crossing
Garmin Edge 500: crossing
Garmin Edge 500: turning Point
Garmin Edge 500: turning Point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
341
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 392 cd/m² Medel: 365.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.97 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 361 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.24
Huawei P9 Plus
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7
Motorola Moto X Force
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.4
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
48%
29%
21%
22%
-32%
19%
22%
Brightness
366
552
51%
560
53%
297
-19%
336
-8%
541
48%
431
18%
563
54%
Brightness Distribution
87
96
10%
91
5%
93
7%
91
5%
85
-2%
84
-3%
91
5%
Black Level *
0.46
0.45
0.38
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.1
1.59
69%
3.55
30%
2.67
48%
3.99
22%
9.19
-80%
4.1
20%
4.4
14%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.5
2.01
63%
3.88
29%
2.81
49%
1.66
70%
10.58
-92%
3.3
40%
4.8
13%
Gamma
2.24 107%
2.01 119%
2.2 109%
2.08 115%
2.32 103%
2.7 89%
2.1 114%
2.2 109%
CCT
7388 88%
6321 103%
7280 89%
6379 102%
6584 99%
9760 67%
6550 99%
6175 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.12
59.05
66.31
73.19
89.38
77.78
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.98
92.8
99.79
100
99.44
Contrast
1267
1244
1532

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5559 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
142090 Points ∼100% +44%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
133626 Points ∼94% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
128749 Points ∼91% +31%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
98413 Points ∼69%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
95743 Points ∼67% -3%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
94122 Points ∼66% -4%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
89911 Points ∼63% -9%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
78324 Points ∼55% -20%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
6556 Points ∼100%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
6522 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
6480 (min: 6415) Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
5645 Points ∼86% -14%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
4791 Points ∼73% -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
4492 Points ∼69% -31%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
4429 Points ∼68% -32%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
2538 Points ∼100% +32%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
2398 Points ∼94% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2170 (min: 2120) Points ∼86% +12%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
1929 Points ∼76%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
1767 Points ∼70% -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1335 Points ∼53% -31%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1262 Points ∼50% -35%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
2425 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
1935 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
1811 Points ∼75% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
3249 Points ∼100% +300%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2394 Points ∼74% +194%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
813 Points ∼25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
2823 Points ∼100% +196%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2234 Points ∼79% +134%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
954 Points ∼34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
2411 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
1912 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
1773 Points ∼74% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
4804 Points ∼100% +340%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
3071 Points ∼64% +181%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
1091 Points ∼23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
3595 Points ∼100% +189%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2641 Points ∼73% +113%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
1242 Points ∼35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
2547 Points ∼100%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
2503 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2121 (min: 1594) Points ∼83% -17%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
1892 Points ∼74% -26%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
1676 Points ∼66% -34%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1402 Points ∼55% -45%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1351 Points ∼53% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
2864 Points ∼100% +255%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
2601 Points ∼91% +222%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2229 (min: 2043) Points ∼78% +176%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
2067 Points ∼72% +156%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1074 Points ∼38% +33%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
829 Points ∼29% +3%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
807 Points ∼28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
2571 Points ∼100% +170%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
2318 Points ∼90% +143%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2204 (min: 1923) Points ∼86% +132%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1849 Points ∼72% +94%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1132 Points ∼44% +19%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
974 Points ∼38% +2%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
952 Points ∼37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
2510 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
2336 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼80% -14%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
1789 Points ∼71% -23%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
1697 Points ∼68% -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1348 Points ∼54% -42%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1282 Points ∼51% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
4633 Points ∼100% +345%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
4557 Points ∼98% +337%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
3226 Points ∼70% +210%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼65% +189%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
2336 Points ∼50% +124%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
1080 Points ∼23% +4%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
1042 Points ∼22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
3424 Points ∼100% +188%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
3316 Points ∼97% +179%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼79% +128%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
2413 Points ∼70% +103%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
2009 Points ∼59% +69%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
1237 Points ∼36% +4%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
1188 Points ∼35%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
21771 Points ∼100% +42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
19610 Points ∼90% +28%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
15517 Points ∼71% +1%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
15331 Points ∼70%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
12854 Points ∼59% -16%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
12852 Points ∼59% -16%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
11963 Points ∼55% -22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
41615 Points ∼100% +91%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
38394 Points ∼92% +76%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
37725 Points ∼91% +73%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
34023 Points ∼82% +56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
33031 Points ∼79% +51%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
21807 Points ∼52%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
21577 Points ∼52% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
30241 Points ∼100% +52%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
28671 Points ∼95% +44%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
27795 Points ∼92% +39%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
26380 Points ∼87% +32%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
25751 Points ∼85% +29%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
19936 Points ∼66%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
19854 Points ∼66% 0%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
Points
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
Points
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
Points
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
Points
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
Points
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
89 fps ∼100% +117%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
81 fps ∼91% +98%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
78.9 fps ∼89% +92%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
58 fps ∼65% +41%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
56 fps ∼63% +37%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
41 fps ∼46%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
40 fps ∼45% -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
27.11 fps ∼30% -34%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +40%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
59 fps ∼98% +37%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
52 fps ∼87% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
51 fps ∼85% +19%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
43 fps ∼72% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
43 fps ∼72%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
42 fps ∼70% -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
18.75 fps ∼31% -56%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +161%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
38.4 fps ∼82% +113%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
38 fps ∼81% +111%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
27 fps ∼57% +50%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
25 fps ∼53% +39%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
18 fps ∼38% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
18 fps ∼38%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
17.54 fps ∼37% -3%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
46 fps ∼100% +142%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
38.4 fps ∼83% +102%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
27 fps ∼59% +42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
27 fps ∼59% +42%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
19 fps ∼41% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼41%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
17 fps ∼37% -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
11.81 fps ∼26% -38%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +210%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
28 fps ∼90% +180%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
28 fps ∼90% +180%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
20 fps ∼65% +100%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
18 fps ∼58% +80%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
10 fps ∼32% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
10 fps ∼32%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
30 fps ∼100% +173%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
28 fps ∼93% +155%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
19 fps ∼63% +73%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
15 fps ∼50% +36%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
12 fps ∼40% +9%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
11 fps ∼37% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
11 fps ∼37%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
18 fps ∼100% +190%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
15 fps ∼83% +142%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
12 fps ∼67% +94%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
6.5 fps ∼36% +5%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
6.2 fps ∼34%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
5.8 fps ∼32% -6%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
18 fps ∼100% +165%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
7.9 fps ∼44% +16%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
7.3 fps ∼41% +7%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
7.1 fps ∼39% +4%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
6.8 fps ∼38%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
6.1 fps ∼34% -10%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 battery life
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
383 min ∼100%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
min ∼0%
Work 2.0 performance score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
5765 Points ∼100%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
5226 Points ∼91%
Work performance score
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
7159 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
7101 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
7058 Points ∼99% -1%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
5365 Points ∼75% -25%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
5094 Points ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
4660 Points ∼65% -35%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
1199 Points ∼100% +14%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
1112 Points ∼93% +6%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
1049 Points ∼87%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
1029 Points ∼86% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
994 Points ∼83% -5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
986 Points ∼82% -6%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
939 Points ∼78% -10%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
837 Points ∼70% -20%
Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
4813 Points ∼100% +218%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
4299 Points ∼89% +184%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
3376 Points ∼70% +123%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
3137 Points ∼65% +107%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2203 Points ∼46% +46%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
2040 Points ∼42% +35%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
1583 Points ∼33% +5%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
1512 Points ∼31%
Memory
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
2667 Points ∼100%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
2627 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2072 Points ∼78% -22%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
2052 Points ∼77% -23%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1945 Points ∼73% -27%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
1124 Points ∼42% -58%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1085 Points ∼41% -59%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
876 Points ∼33% -67%
System
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
4080 Points ∼100% +4%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
3932 Points ∼96%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
3930 Points ∼96% 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
3925 Points ∼96% 0%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
3537 Points ∼87% -10%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
2878 Points ∼71% -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
2737 Points ∼67% -30%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1386 Points ∼34% -65%
Overall
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
2496 Points ∼100% +24%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
2206 Points ∼88% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2074 Points ∼83% +3%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
2025 Points ∼81% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
2019 Points ∼81%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1774 Points ∼71% -12%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1649 Points ∼66% -18%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1465 Points ∼59% -27%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
5552.9 ms * ∼100% -99%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
4377.1 ms * ∼79% -57%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
4080.1 ms * ∼73% -46%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
2922.6 ms * ∼53% -5%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
2920.7 ms * ∼53% -5%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
2792.3 ms * ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2564.1 ms * ∼46% +8%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
1743 ms * ∼31% +38%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
15967 Points ∼100% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
13191 Points ∼83% +9%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
12058 Points ∼76%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
11783 Points ∼74% -2%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
9155 Points ∼57% -24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
8851 Points ∼55% -27%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
8699 Points ∼54% -28%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
8059 Points ∼50% -33%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
118.7 Points ∼100% +70%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
75.12 Points ∼63% +7%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
70 Points ∼59%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
68.4 Points ∼58% -2%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
54.4 Points ∼46% -22%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
49.373 Points ∼42% -29%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
48.2 Points ∼41% -31%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
46 Points ∼39% -34%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
190 Points ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
163 Points ∼86% +25%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
130 Points ∼68%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
128 Points ∼67% -2%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
122 Points ∼64% -6%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
113 Points ∼59% -13%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
106 Points ∼56% -18%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
103 Points ∼54% -21%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P9 Plus
64 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Motorola Moto X Force
32 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
32 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 3
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Huawei P9
32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
42%
-11%
-41%
60%
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
24.95
50.36
102%
46.96
88%
24.83
0%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
62.48
76.43
22%
79.04
27%
55.05
-12%
Random Write 4KB
51.23
15.79
-69%
19.78
-61%
14.53
-72%
18.23
-64%
47.45
-7%
Random Read 4KB
39.33
86.71
120%
22.55
-43%
19.11
-51%
137.62
250%
39
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB
140.38
145.11
3%
47.99
-66%
99.4
-29%
153.3
9%
72.19
-49%
Sequential Read 256KB
284.27
487.34
71%
252.03
-11%
256.75
-10%
408.71
44%
281.26
-1%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high56 fps
Hög belastning
 40.9 °C41.2 °C36.1 °C 
 41.1 °C40.8 °C36.2 °C 
 39.6 °C38.6 °C36.4 °C 
Max: 41.2 °C
Medel: 39 °C
35.1 °C36.4 °C38 °C
35.1 °C37 °C38 °C
34.5 °C36.8 °C37.8 °C
Max: 38 °C
Medel: 36.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  31.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.09 / 0.62 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.87 / 1.2 / 1.27 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.69 / 5.63 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Huawei P9 Plus
Mali-T880 MP4, 1920x1080
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 2560x1440
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 1920x1080
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 2560x1440
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 2560x1440
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 3840x2160
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 1920x1080
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, 1920x1080
Power Consumption
-7%
-14%
-138%
-26%
-60%
-18%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
0.63
28%
0.5
43%
2.85
-228%
0.96
-10%
0.83
5%
0.57
34%
0.77
11%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.1
8%
1.9
-58%
2.95
-146%
1.35
-13%
2.36
-97%
1.24
-3%
2.36
-97%
Idle Maximum *
1.27
1.56
-23%
2.2
-73%
3.26
-157%
1.4
-10%
2.42
-91%
1.36
-7%
2.37
-87%
Load Average *
4.69
5.95
-27%
3.2
32%
8.92
-90%
6.11
-30%
7.27
-55%
5.92
-26%
3.09
34%
Load Maximum *
5.63
6.7
-19%
6.4
-14%
9.39
-67%
9.43
-67%
9.18
-63%
10.53
-87%
5.35
5%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
24tim 06min
Surfa med WLAN v1.3 (Chrome 51)
8tim 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12tim 56min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 23min
Huawei P9 Plus
 Wh, 3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.86 Wh, 3600 mAh
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
10 Wh, 2750 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
13 Wh, 3340 mAh
Motorola Moto X Force
 Wh, 3760 mAh
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
13 Wh, 3430 mAh
OnePlus 3
 Wh, 3000 mAh
Huawei P9
11.46 Wh, 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
30%
-6%
-27%
2%
-27%
16%
-9%
Reader / Idle
1446
1663
15%
1655
14%
1078
-25%
1610
11%
1277
-12%
1338
-7%
1514
5%
H.264
776
914
18%
714
-8%
611
-21%
710
-9%
411
-47%
847
9%
568
-27%
WiFi v1.3
530
732
38%
513
-3%
369
-30%
426
-20%
372
-30%
840
58%
569
7%
Load
263
392
49%
197
-25%
179
-32%
330
25%
210
-20%
268
2%
206
-22%

För

+ snabb systemkrets
+ minneskortplats
+ många frekvenser
+ bra kameror
+ röstkvalitet
+ headset ingår
+ snabbladdning
+ USB Typ C
+ mycket bra batteritid
+ Press Touch
+ infraröd
+ fodral ingår
+ 3 års garanti
+ bra högtalare

Emot

- bara USB 2.0
- bara LTE Cat. 6
- varken MHL eller SlimPort
- viss strypning under ihållande belastning
- ingen 4K-inspelning
- ingen FM-radio
- dyr
In review: Huawei P9 Plus. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei P9 Plus. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.

Läs originaltestet på engelska här.

Huawei P9 Plus är inte bara en större version av standardmodellen av P9, med större skärm och ett större batteri. Plus kommer med flera nyheter, inklusive en helt annan skärmteknik. IR-sändaren och den extra högtalaren kan innebära mervärde för vissa användare, men Press Touch-funktionen är fortfarande i sin linda i Android. Kontextmenyer är t.ex. bara tillgängliga för Huaweis egna appar. Funktionen var egentligen bara användbar för zoomning i bilder, men situationen kan förbättras med tiden.

Den stora frågan är naturligtvis om P9 Plus är värd ca 1250 kr (130 euro) extra jämfört med P9 ”standard”. Svaret är inte givet, eftersom de två modellerna är så gott som identiska vad gäller huvudfunktioner som chassi, anslutningsmöjligheter, kamera, röstkvalitet och prestanda. Om man tar med alla förbättringar i beräkningarna (dubbelt så mycket lagringsutrymme, mer RAM, större skärm, större batteri, ytterligare funktioner) är nog merkostnaden motiverad, så vi kan rekommendera båda modellerna.

P9 Plus är verkligen ingen bra affär för uppåt 7 000 kr (700 euro), men mobilen behöver inte gömma sig bakom konkurrenterna. Endast videokvaliteten (ingen 4K) och grafikprestandan hamnar efter rivalerna, men åtminstone det senare är inget som märks i praktiken. Att P9 Plus fortfarande får en lägre totalpoäng än P9 – trots extrafunktionerna – beror på något sämre resultat i visa discipliner (t.ex. PWM).

Huawei P9 Plus - 07/01/2016 v5.1
Andreas Osthoff

Design
93%
Tangentbord
71 / 75 → 94%
Mus
96%
Anslutningar
55 / 60 → 92%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
83%
Spelprestanda
48 / 63 → 77%
Programprestanda
63 / 70 → 89%
Temperatur
89%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
79 / 91 → 87%
Camera
81%
Medel
80%
89%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei P9 Plus (sammanfattning)
Andreas Osthoff, 2016-08-13 (Update: 2016-08-13)