Notebookcheck

Test: Huawei P40 – Svårsåld trots en utmärkt kamera (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 04/22/2020

Kan de få detta att fungera? Huawei P40 tillhör den första generationen av Huaweis P-serie som inte har Googles tjänster. P40:s kamera tar väldigt skarpa bilder och generellt sett ser denna toppskiktstelefon riktigt lovande ut.

Huawei P40 (P40 Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G76 MP16
Minne
8192 MB 
Skärm
6.1 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 422 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, AMOLED, glansig: ja, HDR, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, Ljudanslutningar: Ljudutmatning genom USB-C, Kortläsare: Nano Memory upp till 256 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B7/​B8/​B9/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41), 5G (n1/​n3/​n28/​n38/n41/​n77/​n78/​n79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.5 x 148.9 x 71.1
Batteri
3800 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.9, fasdetekterande AF (dual-pixel), Sensor för färgomfång, Dubbel LED-blixt, Video @2160p/​60FPS, Video @720p/​7860FPS (kamera 1); 16.0MP, f/​2.2, Vidvinkelslins (kamera 2); 8.0MP, f/​2.4, OIS, Teleobjektiv (kamera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.0, Video @2160p/​60FPS (kamera 1); ToF (kamera 2)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på enhetens undersida, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Headset, 24 Månader Garanti, IP53-certifierad; SAR-värden: 0.49W/​kg (huvud), 1.29W/​kg (kropp); eSIM, fanless, waterproof
Vikt
175 g, Strömförsörjning: 69 g
Pris
799 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Jämförelseenheter

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87 %
04/2020
Huawei P40
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
175 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.1"2340x1080
88 %
03/2020
Samsung Galaxy S20
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
163 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.2"3200x1440
86 %
05/2019
Huawei P30
Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10
165 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.1"2340x1080
87 %
10/2019
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g64 GB SSD6.1"1792x828
86 %
10/2019
OnePlus 7T
SD 855+, Adreno 640
190 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
89 %
08/2019
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
SD 855, Adreno 640
191 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.39"2340x1080
Huawei P40
Huawei P40
Huawei P40
Huawei P40
Huawei P40
Huawei P40
Huawei P40
Huawei P40

Storleksjämförelse

160.94 mm 74.44 mm 8.13 mm 190 g156.7 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 191 g151.7 mm 69.1 mm 7.9 mm 163 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g148.9 mm 71.1 mm 8.5 mm 175 g149.1 mm 71.36 mm 7.57 mm 165 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1368 (min: 1104, max: 1442) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
827 (min: 791, max: 846) MBit/s ∼60% -40%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (min: 490, max: 597) MBit/s ∼41% -59%
Huawei P30
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
544 (min: 38, max: 618) MBit/s ∼40% -60%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
430 (min: 374, max: 485) MBit/s ∼31% -69%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
383 (min: 242, max: 434) MBit/s ∼28% -72%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1368, n=534)
256 MBit/s ∼19% -81%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1296 (min: 1095, max: 1376) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
882 (min: 847, max: 902) MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Huawei P30
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
680 (min: 646, max: 700) MBit/s ∼52% -48%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (min: 204, max: 603) MBit/s ∼41% -59%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
422 (min: 238, max: 447) MBit/s ∼33% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
389 (min: 366, max: 444) MBit/s ∼30% -70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1544, n=534)
242 MBit/s ∼19% -81%
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1368 (1104-1442)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1296 (1095-1376)
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – Sväng
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – Sväng
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
Locating Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
Locating Huawei P40 – Översikt
Locating Huawei P40 – Översikt
Locating Huawei P40 – Sväng
Locating Huawei P40 – Sväng
Locating Huawei P40 – Bro
Locating Huawei P40 – Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
6.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P40: 6.19 ∆E min: 1.28 - max: 11.98 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
14 ∆E
16 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P40: 8.74 ∆E min: 1.9 - max: 16.38 ∆E
Foto - Standardoptiken
Foto - Standardoptiken
Foto - 3x zoom
Foto - 3x zoom
Foto - Standardoptiken
Foto - Standardoptiken
Foto - Standardoptiken
Foto - 5x zoom
Foto - Standardoptiken
Foto - Standardoptiken
Foto - Standardoptiken
Foto - Standardoptiken
Foto - Standardoptiken
Foto - Vidvinkeloptiken
Foto - Standardoptiken
Foto - 3x zoom
Foto - 5x zoom
588
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
609
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
582
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
614
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 616 cd/m² Medel: 592.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 583 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.03 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
129.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.301
Huawei P40
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy S20
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.2
Huawei P30
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.1
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1
OnePlus 7T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
14%
17%
34%
-9%
7%
Brightness middle
583
745
28%
561
-4%
679
16%
693
19%
594
2%
Brightness
593
740
25%
560
-6%
671
13%
703
19%
607
2%
Brightness Distribution
94
97
3%
95
1%
93
-1%
96
2%
91
-3%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.03
2.67
12%
1.5
50%
0.8
74%
3.42
-13%
1.51
50%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.33
4.52
15%
2.5
53%
2.4
55%
6.12
-15%
4.27
20%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
2
-0%
1.8
10%
1.1
45%
3.3
-65%
2.6
-30%
Gamma
2.301 96%
2.092 105%
2.2 100%
2.24 98%
2.265 97%
2.219 99%
CCT
6621 98%
6240 104%
6512 100%
6610 98%
6799 96%
6390 102%
Contrast
999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 245 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 245 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18300 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).
Geekbench 5.1
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2693 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3670 Points ∼100% +36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (2693 - 3979, n=3)
3143 Points ∼86% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 4043, n=50)
1696 Points ∼46% -37%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3606 Points ∼92%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3600 - 4511, n=3)
3906 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=48)
1758 Points ∼45% -51%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2988 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2731 Points ∼90% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (2972 - 3165, n=3)
3042 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (782 - 3531, n=62)
2007 Points ∼66% -33%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
755 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
903 Points ∼100% +20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (755 - 779, n=3)
767 Points ∼85% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 1342, n=62)
574 Points ∼64% -24%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8736 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10431 Points ∼100% +19%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8016 Points ∼77% -8%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8702 Points ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9296 Points ∼89% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (8512 - 11341, n=3)
9530 Points ∼91% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=463)
5673 Points ∼54% -35%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
11268 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
14708 Points ∼100% +31%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9890 Points ∼67% -12%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10286 Points ∼70% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11167 Points ∼76% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (10628 - 14352, n=3)
12083 Points ∼82% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=624)
6193 Points ∼42% -45%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3684 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3112 Points ∼82% -16%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3080 Points ∼81% -16%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3489 Points ∼92% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2657 Points ∼70% -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3638 - 4057, n=3)
3793 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=125)
2605 Points ∼69% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6326 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6315 Points ∼95% 0%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4613 Points ∼69% -27%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6640 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5702 Points ∼86% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4046 - 6360, n=3)
5577 Points ∼84% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=125)
2800 Points ∼42% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5456 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5139 Points ∼93% -6%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4165 Points ∼75% -24%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5530 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4548 Points ∼82% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3948 - 5648, n=3)
5017 Points ∼91% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6618, n=125)
2526 Points ∼46% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4924 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4063 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2682 Points ∼54% -46%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points ∼65% -35%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4635 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3280 Points ∼67% -33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (2497 - 5728, n=3)
4383 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5728, n=469)
2110 Points ∼43% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6606 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8106 Points ∼100% +23%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4162 Points ∼51% -37%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7977 Points ∼98% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6739 Points ∼83% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (5672 - 6771, n=3)
6350 Points ∼78% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9389, n=469)
1971 Points ∼24% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6140 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6638 Points ∼97% +8%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3707 Points ∼54% -40%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points ∼88% -1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6875 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5440 Points ∼79% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4422 - 6508, n=3)
5690 Points ∼83% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8111, n=470)
1830 Points ∼27% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4998 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3935 Points ∼76% -21%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2550 Points ∼49% -49%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points ∼66% -32%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4517 Points ∼87% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3288 Points ∼63% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4836 - 5718, n=3)
5184 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5718, n=499)
2021 Points ∼39% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4293 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
11301 Points ∼63% +163%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3491 Points ∼20% -19%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points ∼100% +316%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11433 Points ∼64% +166%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6730 Points ∼38% +57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4064 - 7905, n=3)
5421 Points ∼30% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=499)
2616 Points ∼15% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4432 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7981 Points ∼87% +80%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3226 Points ∼35% -27%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points ∼100% +108%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8531 Points ∼93% +92%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5460 Points ∼59% +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4213 - 7286, n=3)
5310 Points ∼58% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=499)
2200 Points ∼24% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4242 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3963 Points ∼88% -7%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3496 Points ∼78% -18%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points ∼54% -43%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4492 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3724 Points ∼83% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4242 - 4971, n=3)
4506 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4987, n=549)
2003 Points ∼44% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6244 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8411 Points ∼100% +35%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4200 Points ∼50% -33%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points ∼68% -8%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7150 Points ∼85% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼75% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (6244 - 6465, n=3)
6325 Points ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=549)
1646 Points ∼20% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5651 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6732 Points ∼100% +19%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4020 Points ∼60% -29%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points ∼65% -22%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6319 Points ∼94% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5475 Points ∼81% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (5651 - 6060, n=3)
5800 Points ∼86% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7190, n=550)
1575 Points ∼23% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4279 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4015 Points ∼90% -6%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3548 Points ∼79% -17%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4377 Points ∼98% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3726 Points ∼83% -13%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4192 - 4975, n=3)
4482 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=591)
1870 Points ∼42% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3894 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6388 Points ∼59% +64%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3281 Points ∼30% -16%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10781 Points ∼100% +177%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼59% +62%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3894 - 7499, n=3)
5146 Points ∼48% +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12394, n=590)
2146 Points ∼20% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3973 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5646 Points ∼69% +42%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3337 Points ∼41% -16%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8136 Points ∼100% +105%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5478 Points ∼67% +38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (3973 - 6739, n=3)
4929 Points ∼61% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9123, n=593)
1854 Points ∼23% -53%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
22857 Points ∼67%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
21257 Points ∼63% -7%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33864 Points ∼100% +48%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
33697 Points ∼100% +47%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
27278 Points ∼81% +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (22857 - 46731, n=3)
31526 Points ∼93% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 57583, n=739)
14942 Points ∼44% -35%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
66142 Points ∼32%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
44261 Points ∼21% -33%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
209204 Points ∼100% +216%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
117304 Points ∼56% +77%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
103955 Points ∼50% +57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (60860 - 82652, n=3)
69885 Points ∼33% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=737)
24413 Points ∼12% -63%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46552 Points ∼48%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
35680 Points ∼37% -23%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
97276 Points ∼100% +109%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
75613 Points ∼78% +62%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
63969 Points ∼66% +37%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (46141 - 70593, n=3)
54429 Points ∼56% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 110468, n=737)
19480 Points ∼20% -58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
151 fps ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
199 fps ∼62% +32%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
122 fps ∼38% -19%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps ∼100% +113%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼57% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼52% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (139 - 152, n=3)
147 fps ∼46% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=751)
42.1 fps ∼13% -72%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼87% 0%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
59 fps ∼86% -2%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼87% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼86% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps ∼100% +15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (58 - 60, n=3)
59.3 fps ∼86% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=760)
29.8 fps ∼43% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
100 fps ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
108 fps ∼62% +8%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
87 fps ∼50% -13%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps ∼100% +75%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
112 fps ∼64% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
90 fps ∼51% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (81 - 118, n=3)
99.7 fps ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=656)
24.6 fps ∼14% -75%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +30%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
59 fps ∼98% +28%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +30%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (46 - 59, n=3)
50.7 fps ∼85% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=664)
21.1 fps ∼35% -54%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33 fps ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
85 fps ∼73% +158%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
50 fps ∼43% +52%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps ∼100% +255%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼68% +139%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
62 fps ∼53% +88%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (33 - 75, n=3)
53 fps ∼45% +61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=519)
19.9 fps ∼17% -40%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
57 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +4%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
54 fps ∼90% -5%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +5%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
58 fps ∼97% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
51 fps ∼85% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (26 - 57, n=3)
45 fps ∼75% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=521)
18.3 fps ∼31% -68%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
27 fps ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
22 fps ∼37% -19%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
20 fps ∼33% -26%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +122%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
27 fps ∼45% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼28% -37%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (23 - 46, n=3)
32 fps ∼53% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=261)
10.7 fps ∼18% -60%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29 fps ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
20 fps ∼52% -31%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
14 fps ∼36% -52%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps ∼85% +14%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
18 fps ∼47% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼62% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (19 - 68, n=3)
38.7 fps ∼100% +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=259)
7.62 fps ∼20% -74%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
42 fps ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
50 fps ∼83% +19%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼52% -26%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +43%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼60% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (36 - 60, n=3)
46 fps ∼77% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=265)
16 fps ∼27% -62%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
54 fps ∼61% +10%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼35% -37%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps ∼99% +78%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼53% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼48% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (49 - 165, n=3)
88 fps ∼100% +80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=264)
17.9 fps ∼20% -63%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43 fps ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
50 fps ∼68% +16%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
30 fps ∼41% -30%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps ∼100% +70%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼64% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼49% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (32 - 44, n=3)
39.7 fps ∼54% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=444)
13.5 fps ∼18% -69%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
36 fps ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
43 fps ∼72% +19%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
27 fps ∼45% -25%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +67%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (17 - 36, n=3)
28 fps ∼47% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=448)
12 fps ∼20% -67%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
450373 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
504192 Points ∼100% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (450373 - 496966, n=3)
472677 Points ∼94% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 599843, n=72)
303587 Points ∼60% -33%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1260 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1274 Points ∼86% +1%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1246 Points ∼84% -1%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1485 Points ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1076 Points ∼72% -15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (950 - 1629, n=3)
1280 Points ∼86% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=687)
792 Points ∼53% -37%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8634 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10703 Points ∼100% +24%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6751 Points ∼63% -22%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10611 Points ∼99% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8700 Points ∼81% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (8570 - 10138, n=3)
9114 Points ∼85% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=687)
2309 Points ∼22% -73%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6942 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4271 Points ∼62% -38%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5425 Points ∼78% -22%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4869 Points ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3922 Points ∼56% -44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (6038 - 6942, n=3)
6478 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7945, n=687)
1707 Points ∼25% -75%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8992 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8843 Points ∼96% -2%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7684 Points ∼84% -15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8988 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7423 Points ∼81% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (8823 - 9782, n=3)
9199 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=687)
3252 Points ∼35% -64%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5105 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4764 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4327 Points ∼84% -15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5124 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4045 Points ∼79% -21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
  (4640 - 5589, n=3)
5111 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=687)
1644 Points ∼32% -68%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼100% +139%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
65.295 Points ∼49% +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (55.6 - 70, n=3)
60.4 Points ∼45% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
58.746 Points ∼44% +6%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
55.572 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
53.863 Points ∼41% -3%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
48.635 Points ∼37% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=151)
38.9 Points ∼29% -30%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +184%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
120.83 Points ∼41% +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (103 - 117, n=3)
108 Points ∼37% +5%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
103.24 Points ∼35%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
96.309 Points ∼33% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
96.094 Points ∼33% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
93.499 Points ∼32% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=582)
45.1 Points ∼15% -56%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼100% +149%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)
69.1 runs/min ∼44% +10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (63 - 71.8, n=3)
66 runs/min ∼42% +5%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
63 runs/min ∼40%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
58.7 runs/min ∼37% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chome 80)
50.8 runs/min ∼32% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
42.5 runs/min ∼27% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=138)
42.4 runs/min ∼27% -33%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +94%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼58% +13%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
100 Points ∼54% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
97 Points ∼53% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (95 - 98, n=2)
96.5 Points ∼52% +2%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
95 Points ∼52%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
90 Points ∼49% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=214)
68.8 Points ∼37% -28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼100% +129%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
25353 Points ∼52% +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (20917 - 23690, n=3)
21985 Points ∼45% +3%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
21348 Points ∼44%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
20714 Points ∼42% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
20598 Points ∼42% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
18162 Points ∼37% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=745)
7422 Points ∼15% -65%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (550 - 59466, n=770)
10102 ms * ∼100% -342%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
2511.2 ms * ∼25% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
2333.5 ms * ∼23% -2%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
2287 ms * ∼23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (1914 - 2287, n=3)
2140 ms * ∼21% +6%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
2094.7 ms * ∼21% +8%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
2021.4 ms * ∼20% +12%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼6% +75%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P40Samsung Galaxy S20Huawei P30OnePlus 7TXiaomi Mi 9T ProAverage 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
34%
-13%
-26%
-27%
19%
-54%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.4 (Nano Memory Card)
57.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
71.33 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
7%
59.3 (54.5 - 66.4, n=7)
-11%
50.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=491)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.6 (Nano Memory Card)
66.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-19%
82.82 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
1%
72 (66.3 - 81.6, n=7)
-12%
68.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=491)
-16%
Random Write 4KB
197
228.1
16%
195.3
-1%
29.9
-85%
148.51
-25%
182 (29.9 - 230, n=9)
-8%
29.5 (0.14 - 272, n=828)
-85%
Random Read 4KB
189.4
205.3
8%
138.79
-27%
170.1
-10%
142.5
-25%
194 (170 - 207, n=9)
2%
54.2 (1.59 - 265, n=828)
-71%
Sequential Write 256KB
212.9
669.9
215%
186.03
-13%
218.4
3%
196.87
-8%
527 (213 - 697, n=9)
148%
113 (2.99 - 750, n=828)
-47%
Sequential Read 256KB
1591.6
1541.7
-3%
908.94
-43%
1406
-12%
808.76
-49%
1511 (1406 - 1632, n=9)
-5%
311 (12.1 - 1781, n=828)
-80%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.17.0: Ø59.8 (54-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.17.0: Ø29.9 (26-31)
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.34.1.10: Ø30.2 (29-31)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 5.0.1: Ø30.1 (29-31)
Hög belastning
 38.9 °C38.9 °C36.3 °C 
 39.8 °C38.7 °C37.1 °C 
 39.9 °C38.9 °C37.1 °C 
Max: 39.9 °C
Medel: 38.4 °C
36.1 °C38.3 °C38.4 °C
37.1 °C38.4 °C41 °C
36.8 °C38.4 °C41.3 °C
Max: 41.3 °C
Medel: 38.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  41.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.3432540.740.83131.130.14034.3335034.7336328.927.48023.824.410026.225.71252231.916020.739.22002144.425018.649.431517.754.540017.257.450019606301761.780015.265.5100017.371125015.471.7160018.568200015.966.7250015.170.7315014.469400014.866.4500015.162.9630015.364.2800015.663.91000015.959.11250016.165.91600016.657SPL69.667.428.379.6N24.219.31.144.1median 16.6median 62.9Delta1.67.432.534.431.925.722.326.821.724.929.23126.725.520.324.620.530.52335.815.647.417.846.616.353.215.456.115.955.915.857.913.361.314.162.514.167.91470.213.572.613.469.413.970.114.272.113.975.514.670.814.266.814.768.8156814.958.715.34326.482.40.851.4median 14.7median 62.50.99.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P40Huawei P30
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P40 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Huawei P30 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.3 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.5 / 6.9 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P40
3800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000 mAh
Huawei P30
3650 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-11%
-2%
-7%
-8%
6%
-17%
6%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.9
10%
0.69
31%
0.56
44%
0.9
10%
0.7
30%
1.38 (0.92 - 2.22, n=3)
-38%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=842)
12%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.5
21%
2.41
-27%
2.99
-57%
1.4
26%
1
47%
2.42 (1.41 - 3.94, n=3)
-27%
1.748 (0.6 - 6.2, n=841)
8%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
2
17%
2.51
-5%
3.02
-26%
2.9
-21%
1.3
46%
2.63 (1.47 - 4.01, n=3)
-10%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=842)
15%
Load Average *
3.5
4.8
-37%
3.86
-10%
4.17
-19%
4.7
-34%
5.2
-49%
3.73 (3.35 - 4.34, n=3)
-7%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=836)
-17%
Load Maximum *
6.9
11.5
-67%
6.96
-1%
5.44
21%
8.3
-20%
10
-45%
7.24 (6.37 - 8.46, n=3)
-5%
6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=836)
13%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
34tim 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13tim 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17tim 32min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 56min
Huawei P40
3800 mAh
Huawei P30
3650 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-8%
-3%
16%
5%
-5%
Reader / Idle
2063
1914
-7%
2105
2%
2765
34%
2003
-3%
1768
-14%
H.264
1052
1050
0%
809
-23%
1147
9%
967
-8%
987
-6%
WiFi v1.3
806
715
-11%
726
-10%
866
7%
896
11%
762
-5%
Load
236
208
-12%
279
18%
267
13%
283
20%
249
6%

För

+ Hög prestanda
+ Kamerabilder med hög skärpa
+ Flexibla zoomkameror
+ Högkvalitativ mikrofon
+ Skärm med hög färgprecision
+ Lång batteritid
+ Bra högtalare
+ Snabbt WiFi
+ 5G och eSIM
+ Infraröd ansiktsigenkänning

Emot

- Endast digital zoom vid videoinspelning
- Inga Google-tjänster
- Begränsad till nano-minneskort
- Skärmens uppdateringsfrekvens är begränsad till 60 Hz
- Ingen trådlös laddning

Omdöme – Ge inte upp hoppet

Recension av Huawei P40. Recensionsex från Huawei Germany
Recension av Huawei P40. Recensionsex från Huawei Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Vår ursprungliga fråga om "Kan de få detta att fungera?" kommer av faktum att Huawei P40 inte har tillgång till Googles tjänster. Svaret är definitivt "kanske". Å ena sidan är Huawei P40 en toppskiktstelefon med en bra kamerauppsättning, rimliga batteritider, hög prestanda och snabbt WiFi.

Å andra sidan har den en stor nackdel: Att Googles tjänster saknas gör det omöjligt att använda Google Maps eller Google Play Butik och kan i teorin också orsaka problem med andra appar. Även om App Gallery växer stadigt och det i teorin också går att installera appar från okända källor innebär det sistnämnda en säkerhetsrisk för vanliga användare och till och med för avancerade användare kan det vara svårt att avgöra huruvida filer som laddats ner från externa källor har manipulerats.

Huawei stöttar användarna på många sätt, vilket inkluderar appar och tjänster som hjälper till vid den ursprungliga installationen. Men den är ändå svårsåld, särskilt med tanke på att det finns så många andra alternativa telefoner där dessa saker fungerar redan vid leverans.

Med det sagt har Huaweis ekosystem utvecklats snabbare än väntat, så det är möjligt att situationen ändrats om ett år eller två, vilket gör Huawei till ett ordentligt alternativ för alla som inte vill ha Google på sin telefon.

Huawei P40 är en lyxig toppskiktstelefon som tvingar användarna att kompromissa eftersom Googles tjänster saknas.

Vidare känns det som att Huawei i huvudsak fokuserar på P40 Pro och som ett resultat upplevs det som att P40 hamnar efter vid en direkt jämförelse med dess konkurrenter: För det första kan bara en del av optiken användas för videoinspelning och optisk zoom är begränsad till foton.

För det andra är skärmens uppdateringsfrekvens begränsad till vanliga 60 Hz, ett område där Galaxy S20 har mer att erbjuda. Den saknar också trådlös laddning, skärmen kunde varit mer ljusstark och dessutom behöver man ställa sig frågan om man vill köpa ett dedikerat minneskort endast för Huawei P40 eftersom den inte har stöd för microSD.

Huawei P40 - 04/16/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design
90%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
95%
Anslutningar
58 / 70 → 83%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
54 / 64 → 84%
Programprestanda
76 / 86 → 89%
Temperatur
88%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
77%
Medel
81%
87%
Smartphone - Vägt medel
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei P40 – Svårsåld trots en utmärkt kamera (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2020-04-22 (Update: 2020-04-22)