Notebookcheck

Test: HTC Desire 530 (sammanfattning)

Andreas Kilian, 08/01/2016

Åtråvärd?HTC Desire 530 är en helt ny smartphone i instegsklassen. Den vill locka köpare med unik design, bra kameror och ovanligt bra ljud, bland annat. Vårt test avslöjar om den lever upp till säljargumenten trots sin enkla hårdvara.

HTC Desire 530 (Desire Serie)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 304
Minne
1536 MB 
Skärm
5 tum 16:9, 1280x720 pixlar 294 PPI, kapacitiv pekskärm, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.99 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: headset, Kortläsare: micro-SD max. 2 TB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerometer, närhetssensor, gyro, WiFi Direct, nano-SIM
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM quad-band (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G quad-band (850/900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28), Cat4 (max. 150 Mbit/s ned, 51 Mbit/s upp), SAR kropp: 0.314 W/gg, SAR huvud: 0.375 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.3 x 146.9 x 70.9
Batteri
8.36 Wh, 2200 mAh Litiumpolymer, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 14 tim, Standby 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 696 tim
Operativsystem
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (autofokus f/2.4, 720p-video, 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (fixfokus f/2.8, 720p-video, 30 fps)
Övrigt
Högtalare: frontmonterad monohögtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, adapter, USB-kabel, in-ear-headset, armband, News Republic, Facebook & Facebook Messenger, Instagram, ZOE Video Editor, Themes, HTC Club, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
140 g, Strömförsörjning: 58 g
Pris
2000 EUR

 

Garmin Edge 500 - Route
Garmin Edge 500 - Route
Garmin Edge 500 - Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
HTC Desire 530 - Route
HTC Desire 530 - Route
HTC Desire 530 - Underpass
HTC Desire 530 - Underpass
HTC Desire 530 - Turning point
HTC Desire 530 - Turning point
Camera app: Modes
Camera app: Modes
Camera app: Photo
Camera app: Photo

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
354
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 387 cd/m² Medel: 376.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15.82 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 375 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1172:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.26
HTC Desire 530
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5
Huawei P8 lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5
ZTE Blade V6
IPS, 1280x720, 5
LG Class
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Microsoft Lumia 650
OLED, 1280x720, 5
Screen
Brightness
376
299
-20%
353
-6%
315
-16%
492
31%
353
-6%
Brightness Distribution
91
96
5%
93
2%
81
-11%
91
0%
92
1%
Black Level *
0.32
0.42
-31%
0.39
-22%
0.51
-59%
Contrast
1172
869
-26%
862
-26%
1016
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6
5.8
3%
5.2
13%
8.29
-38%
5.41
10%
2.6
57%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.5
4.8
-7%
5.85
-30%
8.57
-90%
7.67
-70%
1.8
60%
Gamma
2.26 106%
1.84 130%
2.17 111%
1.96 122%
2.19 110%
2.06 117%
CCT
6975 93%
6252 104%
7252 90%
8172 80%
8521 76%
6542 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
70.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91.25
89.7

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 655 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 28740) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (44.4 ms).
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
2922 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3350 Points ∼41% +15%
Huawei P8 lite
3717 Points ∼46% +27%
LG Class
3803 Points ∼47% +30%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
23561 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
24748 Points ∼13% +5%
Microsoft Lumia 650
31844 Points ∼17% +35%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
1007 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
1280 Points ∼5% +27%
ZTE Blade V6
1807 Points ∼7% +79%
LG Class
1442 Points ∼5% +43%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
298 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
405 Points ∼9% +36%
ZTE Blade V6
626 Points ∼13% +110%
LG Class
482 Points ∼10% +62%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
10 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
569 Points ∼37% +5590%
Huawei P8 lite
616 Points ∼40% +6060%
ZTE Blade V6
699 Points ∼45% +6890%
LG Class
696 Points ∼45% +6860%
Microsoft Lumia 650
546 Points ∼35% +5360%
Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
231 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
158 Points ∼2% -32%
Huawei P8 lite
303 Points ∼4% +31%
ZTE Blade V6
287 Points ∼3% +24%
LG Class
312 Points ∼4% +35%
Microsoft Lumia 650
207 Points ∼2% -10%
System (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
742 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
1134 Points ∼17% +53%
Huawei P8 lite
1467 Points ∼22% +98%
ZTE Blade V6
1200 Points ∼18% +62%
LG Class
1068 Points ∼16% +44%
Microsoft Lumia 650
552 Points ∼8% -26%
Overall (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
149 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
423 Points ∼13% +184%
Huawei P8 lite
687 Points ∼21% +361%
ZTE Blade V6
687 Points ∼21% +361%
LG Class
561 Points ∼17% +277%
Microsoft Lumia 650
435 Points ∼13% +192%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
4.8 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
4.6 fps ∼0% -4%
Huawei P8 lite
9.9 fps ∼1% +106%
ZTE Blade V6
8.5 fps ∼1% +77%
LG Class
9.8 fps ∼1% +104%
Microsoft Lumia 650
3.25 fps ∼0% -32%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530 (1184x720)
8.9 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 (1280x720)
7.6 fps ∼2% -15%
Huawei P8 lite
15.3 fps ∼3% +72%
ZTE Blade V6
15 fps ∼3% +69%
LG Class
5.2 fps ∼1% -42%
Microsoft Lumia 650
5.67 fps ∼1% -36%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
1.7 fps ∼0%
ZTE Blade V6
2.8 fps ∼1% +65%
LG Class
1.8 fps ∼0% +6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530 (1184x720)
4 fps ∼2%
ZTE Blade V6
5.8 fps ∼3% +45%
LG Class
4.1 fps ∼2% +3%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
6583 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
8322 Points ∼12% +26%
Huawei P8 lite
8206 Points ∼12% +25%
ZTE Blade V6
9542 Points ∼14% +45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
3871 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3037 Points ∼1% -22%
Huawei P8 lite
5167 Points ∼1% +33%
ZTE Blade V6
4415 Points ∼1% +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
4261 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3535 Points ∼2% -17%
Huawei P8 lite
5629 Points ∼3% +32%
ZTE Blade V6
5013 Points ∼3% +18%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
5756 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
7751 Points ∼5% +35%
Huawei P8 lite
7238 Points ∼5% +26%
ZTE Blade V6
8390 Points ∼5% +46%
LG Class
8969 Points ∼6% +56%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
4189 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3453 Points ∼0% -18%
Huawei P8 lite
5732 Points ∼1% +37%
ZTE Blade V6
5677 Points ∼1% +36%
LG Class
4740 Points ∼1% +13%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
4459 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3938 Points ∼2% -12%
Huawei P8 lite
6010 Points ∼3% +35%
ZTE Blade V6
6116 Points ∼3% +37%
LG Class
5295 Points ∼3% +19%

Legend

 
HTC Desire 530 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Spreadtrum SC9830A, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 lite HiSilicon Kirin 620, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530 (Chrome 50)
17470.6 ms * ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 (Samsung Stock Browser)
13701.5 ms * ∼23% +22%
Huawei P8 lite (Stock Browser)
15866 ms * ∼27% +9%
ZTE Blade V6 (Chrome 44)
25141.4 ms * ∼42% -44%
LG Class (Chrome 47)
13979.7 ms * ∼24% +20%
Microsoft Lumia 650 (Edge 25.10586.218.0)
18237.4 ms * ∼31% -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530 (Chrome 50)
1796 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 (Samsung Stock Browser)
2842 Points ∼6% +58%
Huawei P8 lite (Stock Browser)
2483 Points ∼5% +38%
ZTE Blade V6 (Chrome 44)
2978 Points ∼6% +66%
LG Class
3028 Points ∼6% +69%
Microsoft Lumia 650 (Edge 25.10586.218.0)
2574 Points ∼5% +43%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530 (Chrome 50)
34 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 (Samsung Stock Browser)
39 Points ∼7% +15%
Huawei P8 lite (Chrome 43)
47 Points ∼8% +38%
LG Class
57 Points ∼10% +68%
Microsoft Lumia 650 (Edge 25.10586.218.0)
52 Points ∼9% +53%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530 (Chrome 50)
12.1 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 (Samsung Stock Browser)
16.2 Points ∼5% +34%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.22 MB/s ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.7 MB/s ∼29% +3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
35.56 MB/s ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
20.82 MB/s ∼25% -41%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
8.96 MB/s ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
9.43 MB/s ∼13% +5%
Huawei P8 lite
8.32 MB/s ∼11% -7%
ZTE Blade V6
3.66 MB/s ∼5% -59%
LG Class
7.7 MB/s ∼10% -14%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
11.82 MB/s ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.82 MB/s ∼12% +42%
Huawei P8 lite
18.46 MB/s ∼13% +56%
ZTE Blade V6
27.08 MB/s ∼20% +129%
LG Class
9.67 MB/s ∼7% -18%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
55.76 MB/s ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
41.4 MB/s ∼22% -26%
Huawei P8 lite
52.79 MB/s ∼28% -5%
ZTE Blade V6
37.37 MB/s ∼20% -33%
LG Class
74.14 MB/s ∼39% +33%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
126.99 MB/s ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
64.42 MB/s ∼11% -49%
Huawei P8 lite
139.48 MB/s ∼23% +10%
ZTE Blade V6
269.31 MB/s ∼45% +112%
LG Class
128.61 MB/s ∼22% +1%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
300 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
315 Points ∼8% +5%
Huawei P8 lite
816 Points ∼21% +172%
ZTE Blade V6
922 Points ∼24% +207%
LG Class
427 Points ∼11% +42%
Microsoft Lumia 650
575 Points ∼15% +92%
Real Racing 3
 InställningarVärde
 high20 fps
 low42 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high13 fps
 very low21 fps
Hög belastning
 37.1 °C37 °C36.8 °C 
 37.2 °C37 °C36.4 °C 
 35.8 °C36.8 °C34.5 °C 
Max: 37.2 °C
Medel: 36.5 °C
33.5 °C36.3 °C38.3 °C
33.5 °C36.3 °C38.4 °C
32.1 °C36.1 °C37.1 °C
Max: 38.4 °C
Medel: 35.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  34.1 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Heat map HTC Desire 530 front
Heamap HTC Desire 530 rear
Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.73 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.58 / 2.59 / 2.66 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.22 / 5.67 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2600 mAh
Huawei P8 lite
2200 mAh
ZTE Blade V6
2200 mAh
LG Class
2050 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 650
2000 mAh
Power Consumption
50%
9%
21%
22%
44%
Idle Minimum *
1.58
0.96
39%
1.4
11%
1.2
24%
1.2
24%
0.7
56%
Idle Average *
2.59
1.14
56%
2.3
11%
1.8
31%
1.9
27%
1.1
58%
Idle Maximum *
2.66
1.23
54%
2.5
6%
2.1
21%
2.2
17%
1.18
56%
Load Average *
5.22
2.45
53%
3.9
25%
4.1
21%
3.1
41%
4.04
23%
Load Maximum *
5.67
2.92
49%
6
-6%
5.1
10%
5.6
1%
4.07
28%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
18tim 37min
Surfa med WLAN v1.3 (Chrome 50)
7tim 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7tim 37min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 10min
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2600 mAh
Huawei P8 lite
2200 mAh
ZTE Blade V6
2200 mAh
LG Class
2050 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 650
2000 mAh
Battery Runtime
32%
-24%
-7%
0%
-10%
Reader / Idle
1117
1212
9%
715
-36%
976
-13%
910
-19%
Load
250
433
73%
194
-22%
230
-8%
196
-22%
213
-15%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
425
502
18%
351
-17%
400
-6%
422
-1%
345
-19%
H.264
457
590
29%
369
-19%
424
-7%
628
37%
510
12%

För

+ micro-SD-kort kan användas som systemlagring
+ senaste Android Marshmallow
+ exakt pekskärm
+ tillförlitlig GPS-modul
+ LTE-stöd
+ bra samtalskvalitet
+ skaplig batteritid
+ lättanvänt Android-gränssnitt

Emot

- prestanda under genomsnittet
- relativt stort hölje
- huvudkamerans kvalitet medelmåttig
- tyst mikrofon i hands free-läge
- bara 2,4 GHz-Wi-Fi
- inget Miracast, MHL eller USB OTG
- ingen notifikations-LED
- ej löstagbart batteri
- skärmens medelmåttiga betrakningsvinklar
In review: HTC Desire 530. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: HTC Desire 530. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Läs en längre version av testet på engelska här.

Om HTC lyckats med sitt försök att göra ett unikt designstatement med Desire 530 är en smaksak. Oavsett utseendet är höljet tilltalande och välbyggt, med bra hårdvaruknappar. Materialvalen förmedlar däremot ingen högkvalitativ känsla, särskilt eftersom den är ganska stor för att vara en smartphone med 5-tumsskärm. 

Mobilen för pluspoäng för det uppdaterade operativsystemet, möjligheten att utöka lagringen med micro-SD-kort och den bra batteritiden. Tyvärr är kamerorna bara genomsnittliga och skärmens betraktningsvinklar är inte helt stabila. Vidare är den generella prestandan lägre jämfört med många konkurrenter.

HTC Desire 530 är en färgklick i den ganska breda massan av prisvärda Androidmobiler, även om den inte bjuder på några tekniska höjdpunkter. Köparen kommer förmodligen att välja luren av främst designmässiga skäl och det fräscha Androidgränssnittet.

Några starka alternativ till Desire 530 är bland annat Samsungs Galaxy J3 (2016), som är billigare och har en utmärkt AMOLED-skärm samt utbytbart batteri. Å andra sidan ingår vare sig ljussensor eller den senaste versionen av Android. Om prestanda är desto viktigare är ZTE Blade V6 och Huaweis P8 intressanta mellanklassmodeller, med priser som sjunkit avsevärt sedan lanseringen. 

HTC Desire 530 - 06/22/2016 v5.1
Andreas Kilian

Design
79%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
90%
Anslutningar
39 / 60 → 64%
Vikt
93%
Batteri
89%
Skärm
82%
Spelprestanda
5 / 63 → 8%
Programprestanda
20 / 70 → 29%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
49 / 91 → 54%
Camera
58%
Medel
66%
80%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

> Bärbara datorer/Laptops: Tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: HTC Desire 530 (sammanfattning)
Andreas Kilian, 2016-08- 1 (Update: 2016-08- 1)