Notebookcheck

Test: LG Class (H650E) smartphone (sammanfattning)

Premium? LG:s Class är en billig men ändå högkvalitativ smartphone i mellanklassen. Premiummaterialen kan emellertid inte dölja alla svagheter.
LG Class
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 4 x 1.2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 306
Minne
1536 MB 
Skärm
5.00 tum 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixlar, kapacitiv pekskärm, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.89 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: kombo audio in/ut, 3,5 mm, Kortläsare: micro-SD, Sensorer: accelerometer, närhetssensor, ljussensor, digital kompass
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.1, LTE (4G), UMTS (3G), EDGE, GSM (2G) LTE/4G (800/1800/2600 MHz), HSPA+ 42 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s, UMTS (850/900/1900/2100 MHz), GSM (850/900/1800/1900MHz) Cat. 4 (150 Mbps/50 Mbps), WiFi-Direct, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.7 x 142 x 72
Batteri
2050 mAh Litiumjon, Samtalstid 2G (enligt tillverkaren): 6 tim, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 10 tim, Standby 2G (enligt tillverkaren): 340 tim, Standby 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 340 tim
Operativsystem
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Webbkamera: f2.0
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f2.2
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f2.0
Övrigt
Högtalare: mono, Tangentbord: virtuellt, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
144 g, Strömförsörjning: 53 g
Pris
2300 Kr
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

LG's new Class...
LG's new Class...
...is characterized by...
...classy looks...
...and premium...
...selection of materials.
Unfortunately, it has...
...weaknesses in...
...build.
146.9 mm 70.9 mm 8.19 mm 137 g142.1 mm 72.4 mm 11.6 mm 155 g142.1 mm 71.8 mm 7.9 mm 147 g142 mm 72 mm 7.7 mm 144 g140.5 mm 70.3 mm 8.6 mm 131 g142 mm 69.5 mm 6.8 mm 120 g140 mm 69 mm 6.9 mm 138 g
LG Class
LG Class
LG Class
LG Class
LG Class
LG Class
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
496
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 518 cd/m² Medel: 492.4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 518 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1016:1 (Svärta: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.41 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 7.67 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
Gamma: 2.19
LG Class
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Allview E4
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
-20%
5%
-1%
3%
Brightness middle
518
312
-40%
418
-19%
349
-33%
534
3%
Brightness
492
314
-36%
407
-17%
353
-28%
503
2%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
95
4%
93
2%
82
-10%
Black Level *
0.51
0.49
4%
0.57
-12%
Contrast
1016
853
-16%
937
-8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.41
6.28
-16%
3.92
28%
5.22
4%
5.65
-4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.76
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.67
8.24
-7%
3.81
50%
3.96
48%
3.69
52%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.12 104%
2.27 97%
2.08 106%
2.15 102%
CCT
8521 76%
8145 80%
7361 88%
7308 89%
7289 89%

* ... smaller is better

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG Class
9.8 fps ∼0%
Allview E4
12 fps ∼0% +22%
OnePlus X
21 fps ∼0% +114%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5.3 fps ∼0% -46%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
12 fps ∼0% +22%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG Class
5.2 fps ∼0%
Allview E4
20 fps ∼1% +285%
OnePlus X
23 fps ∼1% +342%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
9.5 fps ∼0% +83%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
17 fps ∼1% +227%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG Class
1.8 fps ∼0%
Allview E4
4.2 fps ∼0% +133%
OnePlus X
8.6 fps ∼1% +378%
Samsung Galaxy J5
1.8 fps ∼0% 0%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1.7 fps ∼0% -6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG Class
4.1 fps ∼1%
Allview E4
8.6 fps ∼2% +110%
OnePlus X
10 fps ∼3% +144%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3.8 fps ∼1% -7%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3.7 fps ∼1% -10%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Class
1442 Points ∼2%
OnePlus X
2570 Points ∼3% +78%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1563 Points ∼2% +8%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
2395 Points ∼3% +66%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Class
482 Points ∼10%
OnePlus X
913 Points ∼19% +89%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
528 Points ∼11% +10%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
435 Points ∼9% -10%
3DMark - 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
LG Class
5295 Points ∼0%
Allview E4
8133 Points ∼1% +54%
Samsung Galaxy J5
5227 Points ∼0% -1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5298 Points ∼0% 0%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
7005 Points ∼1% +32%

Legend

 
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 626G dual sim Mediatek MT6592, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 8 GB eMMC Flash
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG Class
3803 Points ∼19%
Allview E4
3841 Points ∼19% +1%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3966 Points ∼20% +4%
OnePlus X
4450 Points ∼22% +17%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3701 Points ∼19% -3%
BaseMark OS II - Overall (sort by value)
LG Class
561 Points ∼7%
Allview E4
823 Points ∼10% +47%
Samsung Galaxy J5
534 Points ∼6% -5%
OnePlus X
1252 Points ∼15% +123%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
515 Points ∼6% -8%
ZTE Blade V6
687 Points ∼8% +22%

Legend

 
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
LG Class
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
ZTE Blade V6
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
9%
47%
51%
15%
Random Write 4KB
7.7
5.11
-34%
3.66
-52%
14.22
85%
7.2
-6%
Random Read 4KB
9.67
22.79
136%
27.08
180%
16.31
69%
19.25
99%
Sequential Write 256KB
74.14
22.33
-70%
37.37
-50%
49.31
-33%
39.4
-47%
Sequential Read 256KB
128.61
131.42
2%
269.31
109%
235.51
83%
145.47
13%
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
LG Class
1415.4 ms * ∼16%
Allview E4
1605.6 ms * ∼18% -13%
OnePlus X
1509.1 ms * ∼17% -7%
Samsung Galaxy J5
1021.9 ms * ∼11% +28%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1573.1 ms * ∼17% -11%
ZTE Blade V6
1692 ms * ∼19% -20%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
1086.2 ms * ∼12% +23%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG Class
3028 Points ∼5%
Allview E4
3177 Points ∼5% +5%
OnePlus X
4810 Points ∼8% +59%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3038 Points ∼5% 0%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3296 Points ∼6% +9%
ZTE Blade V6
2978 Points ∼5% -2%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
2432 Points ∼4% -20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG Class
13979.7 ms * ∼24%
Allview E4
13148.9 ms * ∼22% +6%
OnePlus X
7264.1 ms * ∼12% +48%
Samsung Galaxy J5
14074 ms * ∼24% -1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
11843 ms * ∼20% +15%
ZTE Blade V6
25141.4 ms * ∼42% -80%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
19204.8 ms * ∼32% -37%
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
LG Class
2979 Points ∼15%
Allview E4
3042 Points ∼16% +2%
OnePlus X
5328 Points ∼27% +79%
Samsung Galaxy J5
2760 Points ∼14% -7%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3125 Points ∼16% +5%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
LG Class
57 Points ∼7%
Allview E4
59 Points ∼7% +4%
OnePlus X
85 Points ∼11% +49%
Samsung Galaxy J5
52 Points ∼6% -9%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
52 Points ∼6% -9%

Legend

 
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 626G dual sim Mediatek MT6592, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 8 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 32.8 °C36.8 °C37.7 °C 
 32.2 °C35.2 °C38.6 °C 
 31.5 °C33.2 °C36.4 °C 
Max: 38.6 °C
Medel: 34.9 °C
34.3 °C35 °C32.9 °C
34.5 °C34.9 °C30.7 °C
34.1 °C34.4 °C20 °C
Max: 35 °C
Medel: 32.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  34.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Strömförbrukning
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.9 / 2.2 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.1 / 5.6 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
16tim 16min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7tim 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 28min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 16min
LG Class
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
Mali-450 MP4, MT6592, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Allview E4
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
-5%
23%
28%
-18%
H.264
628
495
-21%
677
8%
514
-18%
456
-27%
WiFi v1.3
422
398
-6%
526
25%
549
30%
315
-25%
Load
196
220
12%
264
35%
339
73%
193
-2%

För

+ Tilltalande design
+ Baksida i aluminium
+ Minneskortplats
+ Ljusstark skärm

Emot

- Röstkvaliteten kunde varit bättre
- Högtalaren
- Svagheter i konstruktionen
- Fast batteri
In review: LG Class. Test model courtesy of LG Germany
In review: LG Class. Test model courtesy of LG Germany

Vi fick testa LG:s nya Class och hittade delvis den "harmoni" som tillverkaren utlovar. Höljet i aluminium förmedlar ett elegant och robust intryck. De avfasade skärmkanterna är grädde på moset. Tyvärr kan vi inte tala om perfektion. Det saknas noggrannhet på många mindre områden. Visserligen kan bara ett fåtal konkurrenter i prisklassen skryta med jämförbara material. 

Man bör alltid komma ihåg huvudfunktionen med en smartphone: telefonsamtal. Vi förväntar oss bättre röstkvalitet och en bättre mikrofon i framtiden. Högtalaren lämnar övrigt att önska. Bortsett från det presterar LG Class i nivå med sina konkurrenter. Den ljusstarka skärmen har bra bild och kan även användas i utomhus utan problem. Hårdvarans prestanda landar som förväntat i mellanklassen. Även batteritiden visade sig vara genomsnittlig.

Totalt sett är LG Class vad den är tänkt att vara – en solid mellanklass-smartphone med ett superbt hölje. Det är svårt att avgöra om man kan förvänta sig mer med tanke på priset. Vill man ha bättre prestanda och är villig att betala lite mer kan man titta närmare på t.ex. OnePlus X. I samma prisklass bör man även kika på exempelvis Motorolas Moto G.

LG Class - 01/05/2016 v4.1(old)
Nino Ricchizzi

Design
87%
Tangentbord
68 / 75 → 91%
Mus
92%
Anslutningar
44 / 60 → 73%
Vikt
93%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
84%
Spelprestanda
54 / 63 → 86%
Programprestanda
29 / 70 → 41%
Temperatur
89%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
67%
Medel
73%
84%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: LG Class (H650E) smartphone (sammanfattning)
Nino Ricchizzi, 2016-02- 6 (Update: 2016-02- 6)