Test: LG Class (H650E) smartphone (sammanfattning)

Name: LG Class
Brand: LG

Premium? LG:s Class är en billig men ändå högkvalitativ smartphone i mellanklassen. Premiummaterialen kan emellertid inte dölja alla svagheter.

Nino Ricchizzi, ✓ Tanja Hinum, Published 02/06/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of LG Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

LG Class

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 4 x 1.2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 306

Minne

1536 MB

Skärm

5.00 tum 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixlar, kapacitiv pekskärm, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.89 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: kombo audio in/ut, 3,5 mm, Kortläsare: micro-SD, Sensorer: accelerometer, närhetssensor, ljussensor, digital kompass

Nätverk

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, LTE (4G), UMTS (3G), EDGE, GSM (2G) LTE/4G (800/1800/2600 MHz), HSPA+ 42 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s, UMTS (850/900/1900/2100 MHz), GSM (850/900/1800/1900MHz) Cat. 4 (150 Mbps/50 Mbps), WiFi-Direct, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.7 x 142 x 72

Batteri

2050 mAh Litiumjon, Samtalstid 2G (enligt tillverkaren): 6 tim, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 10 tim, Standby 2G (enligt tillverkaren): 340 tim, Standby 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 340 tim

Operativsystem

Android 5.1 Lollipop

Camera

Webbkamera: f2.0
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f2.2
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f2.0

Övrigt

Högtalare: mono, Tangentbord: virtuellt, 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

144 g, Strömförsörjning: 53 g

Pris

2300 Kr

Länkar

LG hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


496 cd/m²	504 cd/m²	487 cd/m²
485 cd/m²	518 cd/m²	477 cd/m²
488 cd/m²	504 cd/m²	473 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 518 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 492.4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 518 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1016:1 (Svärta: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.67 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.19

	LG Class Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Allview E4 Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen		-20%	5%	-1%	3%
Brightness middle	518	312 -40%	418 -19%	349 -33%	534 3%
Brightness	492	314 -36%	407 -17%	353 -28%	503 2%
Brightness Distribution	91	91 0%	95 4%	93 2%	82 -10%
Black Level *	0.51		0.49 4%		0.57 -12%
Contrast	1016		853 -16%		937 -8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.41	6.28 -16%	3.92 28%	5.22 4%	5.65 -4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.76
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.67	8.24 -7%	3.81 50%	3.96 48%	3.69 52%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.12 ^104%	2.27 ^97%	2.08 ^106%	2.15 ^102%
CCT	8521 ^76%	8145 ^80%	7361 ^88%	7308 ^89%	7289 ^89%

* ... smaller is better

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | Geekbench 3 | 3DMark

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Class	5.2 fps
Allview E4	20 fps +285%
OnePlus X	23 fps +342%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	9.5 fps +83%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	17 fps +227%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Class	9.8 fps
Allview E4	12 fps +22%
OnePlus X	21 fps +114%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	5.3 fps -46%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	12 fps +22%

GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Class	1.8 fps
Allview E4	4.2 fps +133%
OnePlus X	8.6 fps +378%
Samsung Galaxy J5	1.8 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	1.7 fps -6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG Class	4.1 fps
Allview E4	8.6 fps +110%
OnePlus X	10 fps +144%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3.8 fps -7%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3.7 fps -10%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Class	1442 Points
OnePlus X	2570 Points +78%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	1563 Points +8%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	2395 Points +66%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Class	482 Points
OnePlus X	913 Points +89%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	528 Points +10%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	435 Points -10%

3DMark - 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
LG Class	5295 Points
Allview E4	8133 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy J5	5227 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	5298 Points 0%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	7005 Points +32%

Legend

LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

HTC Desire 626G dual sim Mediatek MT6592, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 8 GB eMMC Flash

PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG Class	3803 Points
Allview E4	3841 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3966 Points +4%
OnePlus X	4450 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3701 Points -3%

BaseMark OS II - Overall (sort by value)
LG Class	561 Points
Allview E4	823 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy J5	534 Points -5%
OnePlus X	1252 Points +123%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	515 Points -8%
ZTE Blade V6	687 Points +22%

Legend

LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

	LG Class Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	ZTE Blade V6 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5		9%	47%	51%	15%
Sequential Read 256KB	128.6	131.4 2%	269.3 109%	235.5 83%	145.5 13%
Sequential Write 256KB	74.1	22.33 -70%	37.37 -50%	49.31 -33%	39.4 -47%
Random Read 4KB	9.67	22.79 136%	27.08 180%	16.31 69%	19.25 99%
Random Write 4KB	7.7	5.11 -34%	3.66 -52%	14.22 85%	7.2 -6%

Sunspider | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Google V8 Ver. 7 | WebXPRT 2015

Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
LG Class	1415 ms *
Allview E4	1606 ms * -13%
OnePlus X	1509 ms * -7%
Samsung Galaxy J5	1022 ms * +28%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	1573 ms * -11%
ZTE Blade V6	1692 ms * -20%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	1086 ms * +23%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG Class	3028 Points
Allview E4	3177 Points +5%
OnePlus X	4810 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3038 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3296 Points +9%
ZTE Blade V6	2978 Points -2%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	2432 Points -20%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
LG Class	13980 ms *
Allview E4	13149 ms * +6%
OnePlus X	7264 ms * +48%
Samsung Galaxy J5	14074 ms * -1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	11843 ms * +15%
ZTE Blade V6	25141 ms * -80%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	19205 ms * -37%

Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
LG Class	2979 Points
Allview E4	3042 Points +2%
OnePlus X	5328 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy J5	2760 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3125 Points +5%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
LG Class	57 Points
Allview E4	59 Points +4%
OnePlus X	85 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy J5	52 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	52 Points -9%

Legend

LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

HTC Desire 626G dual sim Mediatek MT6592, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 8 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


32.8 °C	36.8 °C	37.7 °C
32.2 °C	35.2 °C	38.6 °C
31.5 °C	33.2 °C	36.4 °C

Max: 38.6 °C
Medel: 34.9 °C


34.3 °C	35 °C	32.9 °C
34.5 °C	34.9 °C	30.7 °C
34.1 °C	34.4 °C	20 °C

Max: 35 °C
Medel: 32.3 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 34.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Strömförbrukning

Låg belastning	1.2 / 1.9 / 2.2 Watt
Hög belastning	3.1 / 5.6 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC 940 Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		16tim 16min
WiFi Websurfing		7tim 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10tim 28min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		3tim 16min

	LG Class Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	HTC Desire 626G dual sim Mali-450 MP4, MT6592, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Allview E4 Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime		-5%	23%	28%	-18%
H.264	628	495 -21%	677 8%	514 -18%	456 -27%
WiFi v1.3	422	398 -6%	526 25%	549 30%	315 -25%
Load	196	220 12%	264 35%	339 73%	193 -2%

För

+ Tilltalande design

+ Baksida i aluminium

+ Minneskortplats

+ Ljusstark skärm

Emot

- Röstkvaliteten kunde varit bättre

- Högtalaren

- Svagheter i konstruktionen

- Fast batteri

In review: LG Class. Test model courtesy of LG Germany

Vi fick testa LG:s nya Class och hittade delvis den "harmoni" som tillverkaren utlovar. Höljet i aluminium förmedlar ett elegant och robust intryck. De avfasade skärmkanterna är grädde på moset. Tyvärr kan vi inte tala om perfektion. Det saknas noggrannhet på många mindre områden. Visserligen kan bara ett fåtal konkurrenter i prisklassen skryta med jämförbara material.

Man bör alltid komma ihåg huvudfunktionen med en smartphone: telefonsamtal. Vi förväntar oss bättre röstkvalitet och en bättre mikrofon i framtiden. Högtalaren lämnar övrigt att önska. Bortsett från det presterar LG Class i nivå med sina konkurrenter. Den ljusstarka skärmen har bra bild och kan även användas i utomhus utan problem. Hårdvarans prestanda landar som förväntat i mellanklassen. Även batteritiden visade sig vara genomsnittlig.

Totalt sett är LG Class vad den är tänkt att vara – en solid mellanklass-smartphone med ett superbt hölje. Det är svårt att avgöra om man kan förvänta sig mer med tanke på priset. Vill man ha bättre prestanda och är villig att betala lite mer kan man titta närmare på t.ex. OnePlus X. I samma prisklass bör man även kika på exempelvis Motorolas Moto G.

LG Class - 2016-01-05 01/05/2016 v4.1^(old)
Nino Ricchizzi

Design

87%

Tangentbord

68 / 75 → 91%

Mus

92%

Anslutningar

44 / 60 → 73%

Vikt

93%

Batteri

91%

Skärm

84%

Spelprestanda

54 / 63 → 86%

Programprestanda

29 / 70 → 41%

Temperatur

89%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

55 / 91 → 60%

Camera

67%

Medel

73%

84%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: LG Class (H650E) smartphone (sammanfattning)

Nino Ricchizzi, 2016-02- 6 (Update: 2016-02- 6)