Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) Duos (sammanfattning)

Andreas Kilian, 07/26/2016

Dynamisk Duos? Samsungs Galaxy J3 är en instegsmodell på 5 tum som förlitar sig till traditionella säljargument som micro-SD-kortplats och löstagbart batteri. Är det tillräckligt för att hävda sig i budgetklassen?

Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 (Galaxy J Serie)
Processor
Spreadtrum SC9830A
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-400 MP2
Minne
1536 MB 
Skärm
5 tum 16:9, 1280x720 pixlar 294 PPI, kapacitiv pekskärm, Super AMOLED, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB 
, 4.35 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3,5 mm headset, Kortläsare: micro-SD max. 128 GB, Sensorer: accelerometer, närhetssensor, gyroskop, WiFi Direct, MirrorLink, USB-OTG, 2x Micro-SIM
Nätverk
Broadcom 802.11ac Network Adapter (10MBit), 802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM quad-band (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G quad-band (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20), SAR kropp: 0.425 W/Kg, SAR huvud: 0.477 W/Kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.9 x 142.3 x 71
Batteri
9.88 Wh, 2600 mAh Litiumjon, removeable, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 13 tim
Operativsystem
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (autofokus f/2.2, 720p-video, 30 FPS)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (fixfokus f/2.2, 720p-video, 30 FPS)
Övrigt
Högtalare: bakre monohögtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, adapter, in-ear headset, Microsoft Office, Galaxy Apps, MyGalaxy, Smart Manager, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
138 g, Strömförsörjning: 46 g
Pris
1800 EUR

 

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a loyal reader of notebookcheck? Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Especially wanted: 
English-Swedish-Translator - 
Details here
News Editor - Details here

Review Editor - 
Details here

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Garmin Edge 500 - total route
Garmin Edge 500 - total route
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - turning point
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - total route
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - total route
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - underpass
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - underpass
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - turning point
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
305
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 306 cd/m² Medel: 298.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.1 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 295 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 1.84
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J5
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5
Huawei P8 lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5
ZTE Blade V6
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Coolpad Porto S
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Microsoft Lumia 650
OLED, 1280x720, 5
Screen
Brightness
299
353
18%
353
18%
315
5%
403
35%
353
18%
Brightness Distribution
96
93
-3%
93
-3%
81
-16%
92
-4%
92
-4%
Black Level *
0.42
0.39
0.5
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.8
5.22
10%
5.2
10%
8.29
-43%
7.9
-36%
2.6
55%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
3.96
17%
5.85
-22%
8.57
-79%
8.9
-85%
1.8
62%
Gamma
1.84 130%
2.08 115%
2.17 111%
1.96 122%
2.46 98%
2.06 117%
CCT
6252 104%
7308 89%
7252 90%
8172 80%
8332 78%
6542 99%
Contrast
869
862
814
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
70.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91.25
89.7

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 238.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3350 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3966 Points ∼48% +18%
Huawei P8 lite
3717 Points ∼45% +11%
Coolpad Porto S
2893 Points ∼35% -14%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
24748 Points ∼11%
Coolpad Porto S
25415 Points ∼11% +3%
Microsoft Lumia 650
31844 Points ∼14% +29%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
1280 Points ∼4%
ZTE Blade V6
1807 Points ∼6% +41%
Coolpad Porto S
1343 Points ∼4% +5%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
405 Points ∼9%
ZTE Blade V6
626 Points ∼13% +55%
Coolpad Porto S
470 Points ∼10% +16%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
569 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy J5
615 Points ∼40% +8%
Huawei P8 lite
616 Points ∼40% +8%
ZTE Blade V6
699 Points ∼45% +23%
Coolpad Porto S
599 Points ∼39% +5%
Microsoft Lumia 650
546 Points ∼35% -4%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
158 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5
314 Points ∼4% +99%
Huawei P8 lite
303 Points ∼4% +92%
ZTE Blade V6
287 Points ∼3% +82%
Coolpad Porto S
173 Points ∼2% +9%
Microsoft Lumia 650
207 Points ∼2% +31%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
1134 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy J5
1058 Points ∼16% -7%
Huawei P8 lite
1467 Points ∼22% +29%
ZTE Blade V6
1200 Points ∼18% +6%
Coolpad Porto S
905 Points ∼14% -20%
Microsoft Lumia 650
552 Points ∼8% -51%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
423 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy J5
534 Points ∼14% +26%
Huawei P8 lite
687 Points ∼18% +62%
ZTE Blade V6
687 Points ∼18% +62%
Coolpad Porto S
458 Points ∼12% +8%
Microsoft Lumia 650
435 Points ∼11% +3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
4.6 fps ∼0%
Huawei P8 lite
9.9 fps ∼1% +115%
ZTE Blade V6
8.5 fps ∼1% +85%
Coolpad Porto S
8.6 fps ∼1% +87%
Microsoft Lumia 650
3.25 fps ∼0% -29%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
7.6 fps ∼2%
Huawei P8 lite
15.3 fps ∼3% +101%
ZTE Blade V6
15 fps ∼3% +97%
Coolpad Porto S
4.8 fps ∼1% -37%
Microsoft Lumia 650
5.67 fps ∼1% -25%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
8322 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy J5
9079 Points ∼13% +9%
Huawei P8 lite
8206 Points ∼11% -1%
ZTE Blade V6
9542 Points ∼13% +15%
Coolpad Porto S
7413 Points ∼10% -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3037 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3782 Points ∼1% +25%
Huawei P8 lite
5167 Points ∼1% +70%
ZTE Blade V6
4415 Points ∼1% +45%
Coolpad Porto S
2590 Points ∼1% -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3535 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5
4345 Points ∼2% +23%
Huawei P8 lite
5629 Points ∼3% +59%
ZTE Blade V6
5013 Points ∼3% +42%
Coolpad Porto S
3028 Points ∼2% -14%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
7751 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J5
8697 Points ∼6% +12%
Huawei P8 lite
7238 Points ∼5% -7%
ZTE Blade V6
8390 Points ∼5% +8%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3453 Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J5
4692 Points ∼1% +36%
Huawei P8 lite
5732 Points ∼1% +66%
ZTE Blade V6
5677 Points ∼1% +64%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3938 Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J5
5227 Points ∼0% +33%
Huawei P8 lite
6010 Points ∼1% +53%
ZTE Blade V6
6116 Points ∼1% +55%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Spreadtrum SC9830A, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 lite HiSilicon Kirin 620, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Porto S Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.2 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J5
18.424 Points ∼6% +14%
Coolpad Porto S
14.168 Points ∼4% -13%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
13701.5 ms * ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy J5
14074 ms * ∼24% -3%
Huawei P8 lite
15866 ms * ∼27% -16%
ZTE Blade V6
25141.4 ms * ∼42% -83%
Coolpad Porto S
32901.1 ms * ∼55% -140%
Microsoft Lumia 650
18237.4 ms * ∼31% -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2842 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3038 Points ∼6% +7%
Huawei P8 lite
2483 Points ∼5% -13%
ZTE Blade V6
2978 Points ∼6% +5%
Coolpad Porto S
2088 Points ∼4% -27%
Microsoft Lumia 650
2574 Points ∼5% -9%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
39 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J5
52 Points ∼7% +33%
Huawei P8 lite
47 Points ∼6% +21%
Microsoft Lumia 650
52 Points ∼7% +33%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
9.43 MB/s ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy J5
7.2 MB/s ∼5% -24%
Huawei P8 lite
8.32 MB/s ∼5% -12%
ZTE Blade V6
3.66 MB/s ∼2% -61%
Coolpad Porto S
13.95 MB/s ∼9% +48%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.82 MB/s ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy J5
19.25 MB/s ∼11% +14%
Huawei P8 lite
18.46 MB/s ∼11% +10%
ZTE Blade V6
27.08 MB/s ∼16% +61%
Coolpad Porto S
22.52 MB/s ∼13% +34%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
41.4 MB/s ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy J5
39.4 MB/s ∼19% -5%
Huawei P8 lite
52.79 MB/s ∼26% +28%
ZTE Blade V6
37.37 MB/s ∼18% -10%
Coolpad Porto S
39.99 MB/s ∼19% -3%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
64.42 MB/s ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy J5
145.47 MB/s ∼18% +126%
Huawei P8 lite
139.48 MB/s ∼18% +117%
ZTE Blade V6
269.31 MB/s ∼34% +318%
Coolpad Porto S
168.23 MB/s ∼21% +161%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
315 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy J5
399 Points ∼9% +27%
Huawei P8 lite
816 Points ∼18% +159%
ZTE Blade V6
922 Points ∼21% +193%
Coolpad Porto S
467 Points ∼11% +48%
Microsoft Lumia 650
575 Points ∼13% +83%
Real Racing 3
 InställningarVärde
 high22 fps
 low54 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high15 fps
 very low27 fps
Hög belastning
 33.9 °C33.7 °C32.5 °C 
 33.8 °C33.6 °C32.5 °C 
 33.1 °C33.4 °C32.2 °C 
Max: 33.9 °C
Medel: 33.2 °C
31 °C32.9 °C35 °C
31.3 °C32.6 °C34.1 °C
29.1 °C32.9 °C32.8 °C
Max: 35 °C
Medel: 32.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  31.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.39 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.96 / 1.14 / 1.23 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 2.45 / 2.92 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2.600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5
2.600 mAh
Huawei P8 lite
2.200 mAh
ZTE Blade V6
2.200 mAh
Coolpad Porto S
2.000 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 650
2.000 mAh
Power Consumption
-70%
-83%
-59%
-54%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
0.96
1.5
-56%
1.4
-46%
1.2
-25%
1.16
-21%
0.7
27%
Idle Average *
1.14
2.2
-93%
2.3
-102%
1.8
-58%
2.21
-94%
1.1
4%
Idle Maximum *
1.23
2.4
-95%
2.5
-103%
2.1
-71%
2.24
-82%
1.18
4%
Load Average *
2.45
3.5
-43%
3.9
-59%
4.1
-67%
3.34
-36%
4.04
-65%
Load Maximum *
2.92
4.8
-64%
6
-105%
5.1
-75%
3.95
-35%
4.07
-39%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
20tim 12min
Surfa med WLAN v1.3 (Chrome 50)
8tim 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9tim 50min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
7tim 13min
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2.600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5
2.600 mAh
Huawei P8 lite
2.200 mAh
ZTE Blade V6
2.200 mAh
Coolpad Porto S
2.000 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 650
2.000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
-41%
-32%
0%
-30%
Reader / Idle
1212
1292
7%
715
-41%
910
-25%
H.264
590
657
11%
369
-37%
424
-28%
510
-14%
WiFi v1.3
502
495
-1%
351
-30%
400
-20%
504
0%
345
-31%
Load
433
350
-19%
194
-55%
230
-47%
213
-51%

För

+ välbyggt hölje
+ microSD-plats
+ App2SD och USB OTG
+ dual-SIM
+ skaplig skärm
+ exakt pekskärm
+ lång batteritid
+ löstagbart batteri
+ LTE-stöd

Emot

- ingen ljussensor
- ingen notifikations-LED
- medelmåttig kamera
- endast Android 5.1.1
- instabil GPS-modul
- svag mikrofon i hands free-läge
- bara 2,4 GHz-Wi-Fi
- ej MiraCast eller MHL
- strypning under belastning
In review: Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - SM-J320F/DS. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) - SM-J320F/DS. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Läs det mer omfattande originaltestet på engelska här.

Galaxy J3 (SM-J320F/DS) verkar vara en ”lite”-version av förra årets Galaxy J5 som nyligen ersattes av den tydligt uppfräschade Galaxy J5 (2016). Arvet från den äldre modellen är tydligt, med en bra AMOLED-panel och mycket liknande design. Det går fortfarande att byta ut batteriet. Mobilen har ett robust, välbyggd hölje även om den är helt i plast. Ytterligare förtjänster är exakt pekskärm och lång batteritid, samt platser för två SIM-kort och microSD.

Kamerorna har man däremot kompromissat med. J3 har en medelmåttig 8-megapixelsensor på baksidan som bara tar hyfsade bilder under idealiska förhållanden. Magra 4,35 GB lagringsutrymme är också snålt tilltaget. Lyckligtvis stöder Galaxy J3 USB OTG och program kan flyttas till minneskortet för att undvika lagringsbrist i viss utsträckning. Systemkretsen är jämförelsevis långsam, men renderar gränssnittet utan eftersläpningar.

Sammanfattningsvis är Galaxy J3 (2016) en tilltalande mobil i budgetklassen, med många fördelar trots ett lågt pris. De mest tydliga kompromisserna är det tajta lagringsutrymmet och kamerans medelmåttiga kvalitet.

Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 - 06/17/2016 v5.1
Andreas Kilian

Design
84%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
91%
Anslutningar
40 / 60 → 66%
Vikt
93%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
82%
Spelprestanda
5 / 63 → 8%
Programprestanda
25 / 70 → 36%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Camera
61%
Medel
68%
81%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) Duos (sammanfattning)
Andreas Kilian, 2016-07-26 (Update: 2016-07-26)