Notebookcheck

Test: Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL) Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Manuel Masiero (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 11/13/2017

Förbättrad verklighet. Asus ZenFone AR kombinerar Förstärkt Verklighet med Virtuell Verklighet: den är, trots allt, den första smartphone någonsin som certifierats för Google Tango så väl som Daydream. Den mest intressanta frågan är om dess AR- och VR-funktioner rättfärdigar det höga priset på runt ~6 500 SEK ($770).

Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL (Zenfone Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
Minne
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4
Skärm
5.7 tum 16:9, 2560x1440 pixlar 515 PPI, kapacitiv, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 4, 10-fingrars multitouch, över 100% NTSC-färgrymdstäckning, 79% skärm-till-kropp ratio, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm headset, Kortläsare: MikroSD-kort upp till 2 TB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerometer, gyroskop, elektronisk kompass, närhetssensor, fotodetektor, hall-sensor, RGB-sensor, IR-sensor (laser autofokus), fingeravtrycksläsare, barometer, Wi-Fi Direct, Quick Charge 3.0, USB-OTG
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1,800/​1,900 MHz), UMTS (800, 850, 900, 1,900, 2,100 MHz), LTE Cat.11 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41), Nerladdning max 600 MBit/s, Uppladdning max 75 MBit/s, SAR 0.85 W/Kg (huvud), 59 W/kg (kropp), Nano-SIM, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.95 x 158.7 x 77.7
Batteri
3300 mAh Litiumjon, BoostMaster snabbladdning: 60 % laddning på 39 minuter (18 W) enligt tillverkaren
Operativsystem
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 23 MPix Sony IMX318, 1.0 µm pixelstorlek, f/2.0 bländare, 27 mm brännvidd, 6-elementslins, 4-vägars optisk bildstabilisering (OIS), 3-vägars elektronisk bildstabilisering (EIS), dubbel LED dual-färgsblixt, 4K videoinspelning i 30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix OmniVision 8856, 1,12 µm pixelstorlek, f/2.0 bländare, skärmblixt
Övrigt
Högtalare: mono-högtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, laddare (9V, 2A), USB C-kabel, USB C till USB A (2.0) adapter, hörlurar, dokumentation (snabbstartsguide, garantibroschyr), ASUS ZenUI 3.0, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
170 g, Strömförsörjning: 40 g
Pris
899 Kr

 

Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)
Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL)

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
915 MBit/s ∼100% +169%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371 MBit/s ∼41% +9%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
340 MBit/s ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 MBit/s ∼36% -3%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 MBit/s ∼36% -4%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 64 GB eMMC Flash
313 MBit/s ∼34% -8%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 MBit/s ∼100% +118%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
539 MBit/s ∼83% +80%
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
354 MBit/s ∼54% +18%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
299 MBit/s ∼46%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 64 GB eMMC Flash
261 MBit/s ∼40% -13%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
220 MBit/s ∼34% -26%
Asus ZenFone AR: overview
Asus ZenFone AR: overview
Asus ZenFone AR: overpass
Asus ZenFone AR: overpass
Asus ZenFone AR: turning point
Asus ZenFone AR: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: overpass
Garmin Edge 500: overpass
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
362
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 362 cd/m² Medel: 340.9 cd/m² Minimum: 7.06 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 338 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.25
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
IPS, 2560x1440, 6.4
Apple iPhone 8
IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.7
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7
Samsung Galaxy S8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
OnePlus 5
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-27%
52%
9%
33%
38%
Brightness
341
479
40%
580
70%
611
79%
564
65%
431
26%
Brightness Distribution
90
93
3%
91
1%
89
-1%
94
4%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.482
0.44
0.23
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.7
7
-89%
1.2
68%
4.5
-22%
2.7
27%
1.6
57%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.9
7.9
-61%
1.6
67%
6
-22%
3.1
37%
1.7
65%
Gamma
2.25 107%
2.34 103%
2.25 107%
2.27 106%
2.15 112%
2.25 107%
CCT
7286 89%
7826 83%
6688 97%
7996 81%
6335 103%
6329 103%
Contrast
980
1373
2809
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67.74
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.05
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 231.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 231.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 231.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
150228 Points ∼66%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
85438 Points ∼37% -43%
Apple iPhone 8
204270 Points ∼90% +36%
LG G6
151751 Points ∼67% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
171884 Points ∼75% +14%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points ∼78% +18%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
5972 Points ∼58%
LG G6
5152 Points ∼50% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5370 Points ∼52% -10%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points ∼64% +10%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
6318 Points ∼74%
LG G6
5703 Points ∼67% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6035 Points ∼71% -4%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points ∼92% +24%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
985 Points ∼58%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
966 Points ∼57% -2%
LG G6
1073 Points ∼63% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1156 Points ∼68% +17%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points ∼76% +31%
Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4649 Points ∼50%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1623 Points ∼18% -65%
LG G6
5138 Points ∼56% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6096 Points ∼66% +31%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points ∼66% +32%
Memory (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1948 Points ∼44%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1940 Points ∼44% 0%
LG G6
1930 Points ∼44% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3039 Points ∼69% +56%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points ∼100% +127%
System (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3220 Points ∼31%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
2297 Points ∼22% -29%
LG G6
3646 Points ∼35% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5386 Points ∼52% +67%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points ∼57% +83%
Overall (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2315 Points ∼61%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1626 Points ∼43% -30%
LG G6
2496 Points ∼66% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3277 Points ∼86% +42%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points ∼100% +64%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG G6
7080 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S8
8490 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 5
8005 Points ∼93%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4359 Points ∼17%
Apple iPhone 8
10380 Points ∼41% +138%
LG G6
4369 Points ∼17% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6711 Points ∼27% +54%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points ∼27% +56%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1891 Points ∼32%
Apple iPhone 8
4162 Points ∼70% +120%
LG G6
1831 Points ∼31% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1997 Points ∼34% +6%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points ∼33% +4%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1787 Points ∼58%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
2014 Points ∼65% +13%
Apple iPhone 8
1989 Points ∼65% +11%
LG G6
1955 Points ∼64% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2494 Points ∼81% +40%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points ∼98% +69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2767 Points ∼51%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
755 Points ∼14% -73%
Apple iPhone 8
2581 Points ∼48% -7%
LG G6
2980 Points ∼55% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3472 Points ∼64% +25%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points ∼70% +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
2466 Points ∼63%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
877 Points ∼23% -64%
Apple iPhone 8
2421 Points ∼62% -2%
LG G6
2669 Points ∼69% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3194 Points ∼82% +30%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points ∼92% +45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
1721 Points ∼56%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1844 Points ∼60% +7%
Apple iPhone 8
1774 Points ∼58% +3%
LG G6
1961 Points ∼64% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2440 Points ∼79% +42%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points ∼98% +75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
4354 Points ∼56%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1271 Points ∼16% -71%
LG G6
4121 Points ∼53% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4923 Points ∼64% +13%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points ∼62% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3249 Points ∼65%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1365 Points ∼27% -58%
LG G6
3282 Points ∼66% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4015 Points ∼81% +24%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points ∼85% +30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
22750 Points ∼32%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
11364 Points ∼16% -50%
Apple iPhone 8
24131 Points ∼34% +6%
LG G6
22335 Points ∼31% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
21543 Points ∼30% -5%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points ∼27% -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
34038 Points ∼7%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
21103 Points ∼5% -38%
Apple iPhone 8
112424 Points ∼25% +230%
LG G6
32128 Points ∼7% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8
36347 Points ∼8% +7%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points ∼13% +70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
30658 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
17727 Points ∼9% -42%
Apple iPhone 8
62006 Points ∼31% +102%
LG G6
29276 Points ∼15% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8
31532 Points ∼16% +3%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points ∼20% +31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
87 fps ∼6%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
22 fps ∼2% -75%
Apple iPhone 8
161.3 fps ∼12% +85%
LG G6
75 fps ∼5% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S8
121 fps ∼9% +39%
OnePlus 5
115 fps ∼8% +32%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
51 fps ∼11%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
33 fps ∼7% -35%
Apple iPhone 8
119.8 fps ∼26% +135%
LG G6
46 fps ∼10% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S8
60 fps ∼13% +18%
OnePlus 5
60 fps ∼13% +18%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
45 fps ∼8%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
14 fps ∼3% -69%
Apple iPhone 8
70.8 fps ∼13% +57%
LG G6
38 fps ∼7% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S8
62 fps ∼11% +38%
OnePlus 5
61 fps ∼11% +36%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
28 fps ∼8%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
8.6 fps ∼2% -69%
Apple iPhone 8
114.5 fps ∼31% +309%
LG G6
27 fps ∼7% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8
41 fps ∼11% +46%
OnePlus 5
56 fps ∼15% +100%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
16 fps ∼4%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
9.2 fps ∼2% -42%
Apple iPhone 8
54 fps ∼13% +238%
LG G6
29 fps ∼7% +81%
Samsung Galaxy S8
24 fps ∼6% +50%
OnePlus 5
42 fps ∼10% +163%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
15 fps ∼9%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
4.7 fps ∼3% -69%
Apple iPhone 8
109.7 fps ∼62% +631%
LG G6
16 fps ∼9% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S8
23 fps ∼13% +53%
OnePlus 5
41 fps ∼23% +173%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
19 fps ∼5%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
3.2 fps ∼1% -83%
LG G6
20 fps ∼6% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S8
25 fps ∼7% +32%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼7% +32%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
11 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
5.4 fps ∼0% -51%
LG G6
11 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
13 fps ∼0% +18%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼1% +127%

Legend

 
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points ∼100% +263%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
71.6 Points ∼35% +26%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
65.846 Points ∼32% +16%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
56.931 Points ∼28%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
56.628 Points ∼27% -1%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
50.703 Points ∼25% -11%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼100% +246%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
12941 Points ∼38% +31%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
11945 Points ∼35% +21%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
9863 Points ∼29%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
9113 Points ∼27% -8%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
8837 Points ∼26% -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
3597.8 ms * ∼100% -48%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
2621.7 ms * ∼73% -8%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
2464.2 ms * ∼68% -2%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
2423.1 ms * ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
1886.6 ms * ∼52% +22%
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼20% +70%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points ∼100% +153%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
194 Points ∼54% +37%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
161 Points ∼45% +13%
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
142 Points ∼40%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
122 Points ∼34% -14%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
111 Points ∼31% -22%

* ... smaller is better

Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KLLenovo Phab 2 ProLG G6Samsung Galaxy S8OnePlus 5
AndroBench 3-5
-22%
-2%
21%
52%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
54.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
53.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-15%
53.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-15%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-14%
77.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
63.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
13.51
12.92
-4%
16.58
23%
15.25
13%
19.3
43%
Random Read 4KB
88.44
38.53
-56%
95.19
8%
127.17
44%
141
59%
Sequential Write 256KB
142.82
138.01
-3%
122.85
-14%
193.23
35%
201.5
41%
Sequential Read 256KB
458.91
254.99
-44%
428.67
-7%
792.86
73%
748
63%
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high56 fps
jämför
LG G3 (min)
 801 MSM8974AC, Adreno 330
27
   ...
NVIDIA Shield Tablet P1761W
 K1, GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU)
55
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
 8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12
55
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
 821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
56
Huawei Nova 2
 Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2
56
Huawei P9 Plus
 Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4
56
   ...
Nokia 8 (max)
 835, Adreno 540
60
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Hög belastning
 37.1 °C36.5 °C33.6 °C 
 37.8 °C37.6 °C32.7 °C 
 35.8 °C35.2 °C32.5 °C 
Max: 37.8 °C
Medel: 35.4 °C
31.8 °C34.2 °C36 °C
31.9 °C34.5 °C37.9 °C
30.3 °C36.6 °C35.1 °C
Max: 37.9 °C
Medel: 34.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  25.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.241.62532.941.13137.240.34031.736.25039.636.56328.336.28027.334.510026.931.512526.731.71602439.320020.947.325020.951.231519.55940018.559.850017.563.263017.560.680015.762.3100015.868.8125016.669.4160015.868200015.468.5250015.570.931501672.6400015.87550001684.3630016.381.6800016.376.81000016.275.41250016.474.11600016.455.6SPL28.688.4N1.165median 16.4Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KLmedian 68Delta2.19.637.636.234.835.333.734.333.933.833.333.531.331.232.230.629.72930.631.127.441.326.850.42654.824.858.323.960.923.464.422.768.622.46722.667.92267.121.763.821.563.821.26821.172.120.978.220.978.32172.72171.121.272.32168.421.257.73484.52.256.8median 22Lenovo Phab 2 Promedian 671.86.631.639.125.437.625.336.932.940.833.635.231.633.328.433.82733.520.842.82250.821.351.520.849.821.253.919.45619.558.717.761.617.962.917.866.217.368.217.468.416.768.517.267.318.26817.969.817.668.817.767.517.861.717.959.118.160.618.256.23078.41.343.6median 17.9Apple iPhone 8median 61.61.37.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Phab 2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.46 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.31 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.88 / 1.24 / 1.26 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 7.71 / 8.64 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3300 mAh
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
4050 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Power Consumption
-147%
10%
1%
23%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
0.88
3
-241%
0.54
39%
0.62
30%
0.78
11%
0.73
17%
Idle Average *
1.24
4.1
-231%
1.63
-31%
1.43
-15%
1.1
11%
1.44
-16%
Idle Maximum *
1.26
4.2
-233%
1.67
-33%
1.48
-17%
1.16
8%
1.5
-19%
Load Average *
7.71
10.4
-35%
2.74
64%
5.52
28%
4.15
46%
6.91
10%
Load Maximum *
8.64
8.1
6%
7.78
10%
10.47
-21%
5.12
41%
8.51
2%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
24tim 36min
Surfa med WLAN v1.3
7tim 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 36min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 41min
Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL
3300 mAh
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
4050 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-9%
11%
28%
29%
8%
Reader / Idle
1476
1119
-24%
1629
10%
1789
21%
1667
13%
1534
4%
H.264
636
567
-11%
698
10%
779
22%
771
21%
623
-2%
WiFi v1.3
444
508
14%
585
32%
692
56%
719
62%
518
17%
Load
221
190
-14%
202
-9%
252
14%
264
19%
247
12%

För

+ AR- och VR-kompatibel
+ robust högkvalitativt hölje
+ snabb UFS 2.0-lagring
+ LTE Cat. 11
+ WQHD OLED-skärm
+ hyfsad kamera
+ hög prestanda

Emot

- väldigt dyr
- endast ett fåtal Tango-appar tillgängliga
- ingen hybrid Dual-Sim plats
- kort batteritid
In review: Asus ZenFone AR. Review unit courtesy of Asus Germany.
In review: Asus ZenFone AR. Review unit courtesy of Asus Germany.

Ingen tvekan: ZenFone AR är den första smartphone som kör Googles Tango-appar för Förstärkt Verklighet smidigt. Men med tanke på det relativt låga antalet appar (runt 30) - dom flesta är dessutom gimmicks - så är Tango i det sitt nuvarande tillstånd inte en funktion man känner att man måste ha. Frågan är: är du villig att spendera ~6 700 SEK ($800) plus moms för denna ganska dåliga AR-upplevelse? Vi misstänker att för dom flesta användare kommer Tango inte vara en avgörande faktor i övervägandet av ZenFone AR, särskilt då Googles Daydream VR-glasögon inte är inkluderade och måste köpas separat.

Att köpa ZenFone AR bara för Google Tango kommer inte vara värt det. Det som blir kvar vid sidan om förstärkt verklighet är en duglig men dyr smartphone.

LG G6 är lika snabb som ZenFone AR för bara halva priset. Asus TriCam kunde inte heller imponera på oss. Ja, dom resulterande bilderna är definitivt skapliga, men dom är långt ifrån bäst. Dessutom är batteritiden väldigt dålig och ZenFone AR får slut på soppa jämförelsevis snabbt.

I slutändan är Asus ZenFone AR en välgjord, högkvalitativ smartphone med WQHD OLED-skärm, mer än nödvändig prestanda för vardagliga appar och spel och väldigt snabba kommunikationsmoduler.

Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL - 11/02/2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Design
86%
Tangentbord
72 / 75 → 95%
Mus
93%
Anslutningar
48 / 60 → 79%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
84%
Spelprestanda
60 / 63 → 95%
Programprestanda
61 / 70 → 87%
Temperatur
92%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Camera
82%
Medel
79%
87%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Asus ZenFone AR (ZS571KL) Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Manuel Masiero, 2017-11-13 (Update: 2017-11-14)