Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51 - Lättviktare med Kaby Lake G som kämpar mot nedskärningar (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.7 % | 02/2020 | Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870 | 1.5 kg | 17 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 87.8 % | 08/2019 | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2 kg | 17 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 89.7 % | 12/2019 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M | 2 kg | 16.2 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
| 87.1 % | 02/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 1.7 kg | 18.7 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (17.6 - 205, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (16.8 - 266, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 347 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1321:1 (Svärta: 0.265 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.08 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.38
ΔE Greyscale 3.62 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
| Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 B156ZAN03.1, LTPS IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M APPA044, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE NE156QUM-N66, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | -3% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 86.1 | 88.1 2% | 82 -5% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.6 0% | 99.1 -1% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.2 | 91.8 -7% | 96.9 -2% | |
| Response Times | 95% | 15% | 25% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 63 ? | 2.3 ? 96% | 52.4 ? 17% | 46.4 ? 26% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 40 ? | 2.4 ? 94% | 34.9 ? 13% | 30.4 ? 24% |
| PWM Frequency | 59.5 ? | 131700 | ||
| Screen | 5% | 28% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle | 350 | 421.2 20% | 519 48% | 464 33% |
| Brightness | 329 | 417 27% | 477 45% | 448 36% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 94 9% | 86 0% | 90 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.265 | 0.39 -47% | 0.36 -36% | |
| Contrast | 1321 | 1331 1% | 1289 -2% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.08 | 6.06 -19% | 2.28 55% | 4.2 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.25 | 11.89 -16% | 6.54 36% | 11.4 -11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.38 | 0.86 80% | 0.8 82% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.62 | 2.8 23% | 0.9 75% | 7.2 -99% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.15 102% | 2145 0% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 6389 102% | 6235 104% | 6572 99% | 6345 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88 | 81 -8% | 78 -11% | 85.2 -3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99.6 0% | 99 -1% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 33% /
17% | 22% /
26% | 8% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 32 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 31 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3551 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4031 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4359 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4583 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Apple SSD AP1024 7171 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Average WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 1% | -7% | 11% | -8% | |
| Write 4K | 120.6 | 104.3 -14% | 55.5 -54% | 148.1 23% | 110 ? -9% |
| Read 4K | 41.43 | 45.23 9% | 16.21 -61% | 47.31 14% | 36.9 ? -11% |
| Write Seq | 2402 | 1729 -28% | 1959 -18% | 1414 -41% | 1976 ? -18% |
| Read Seq | 1997 | 1861 -7% | 1763 -12% | 1320 -34% | 1710 ? -14% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 335.2 | 509 52% | 398.5 19% | 493.6 47% | 339 ? 1% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 381.7 | 388.5 2% | 648 70% | 594 56% | 417 ? 9% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2553 | 2813 10% | 2727 7% | 2970 16% | 2218 ? -13% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3356 | 2906 -13% | 3242 -3% | 3472 3% | 2940 ? -12% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9104 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15911 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5879 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2121 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | 4K | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 216.3 | 165.3 | 148 | 59.8 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 116.6 | 75.9 | 41.3 | 24.3 | 14.4 |
| F1 2019 (2019) | 105 | 65 | 56 | 38 | 16 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 32.6 / 40.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.7 °C / 85.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.9 °C / -1.7 F).
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.28 / 0.45 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 12 / 17.8 / 19.7 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
59 / 87 Watt |
   
| |
| Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, LTPS IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, Apple SSD AP1024 7171, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -9% | 8% | -11% | 2% | 6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 12 | 6.2 48% | 3.7 69% | 8.5 29% | 9.97 ? 17% | 7.29 ? 39% |
| Idle Average * | 17.8 | 9.6 46% | 12.1 32% | 14.7 17% | 15.8 ? 11% | 11.8 ? 34% |
| Idle Maximum * | 19.7 | 21.2 -8% | 17 14% | 19.4 2% | 17.4 ? 12% | 14.6 ? 26% |
| Load Average * | 59 | 104.3 -77% | 91.5 -55% | 89.6 -52% | 72.5 ? -23% | 77.7 ? -32% |
| Load Maximum * | 87 | 135.3 -56% | 102.3 -18% | 129.8 -49% | 93.8 ? -8% | 121 ? -39% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 91.7 | 103 | 96.1 |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, 48 Wh | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, 99.8 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 80 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 100% | 56% | -14% | 74% | |
| Reader / Idle | 462 | 910 97% | 933 ? 102% | ||
| H.264 | 416 | 580 39% | 284 -32% | 710 ? 71% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 275 | 467 70% | 718 161% | 285 4% | 572 ? 108% |
| Load | 85 | 199 134% | 58 -32% | 72 -15% | 97.7 ? 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 54 | 81.8 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Med sin ConceptD 5 CN515-51 har Acer skapat en ovanlig multimedialaptop.
Den skiljer sig utseendemässigt från andra enheter i den här klassen och har tack vare sina chassimaterial ett tydligt fokus på låg vikt. Detta är bra, men det svaga skärmlocket blir en negativ sidoeffekt. När det kommer till portarna så har Acer inte inkluderat Thunderbolt 3. Den har dessutom en extremt långsam SD-kortläsare, vilket känns väldigt malplacerat i en såpass dyr multimedialaptop. Detsamma gäller den utdaterade WiFi-modulen som inte ens har stöd för den senaste Bluetooth-standarden. Uppgraderingsmöjligheterna kan vi både ge beröm och kritisera: Även om datorns RAM är fastlött så är det lätt att uppgradera lagringen tack vare en ledig M.2 2280-plats.
Skärmen har ett brett färgomfång, men relativt stark blödning från bakgrundsbelysningen och en ljusstyrka som var lägre än utlovat gjorde oss besvikna. Vad det gäller prestandan så levererar ConceptD ungefär vad vi förväntade oss från Kaby Lake G. Bra prestanda för en multimedialaptop, men många andra modeller med nyare Intel-processorer och dedikerade Nvidia-grafikkort ger bättre prestanda. Tyvärr innebär detta inte att den istället har bättre batteritid. Ett för litet batteri ställer till den ekvationen. Vi får också ge den kritik för spoltjut, att prestandan begränsas vid batteridrift och att högtalarna var sämre än genomsnittet (för en multimedialaptop).
Inte utan kompromisser: Tyvärr har Acer valt att skära ner på kostnaden för nödvändiga komponenter. Den här datorn kan inte tävla med dyrare konkurrenter.
Det känns oklart vem som Acer marknadsför ConceptD 5 CN515-51 åt. De mest uttalade positiva egenskaperna är den låga vikten och den färgglada skärmen. Med dessa styrkor kan den tänkas vara en dröm för varje fotograf. Men fotografer kommer troligen bli extremt irriterade av den långsamma SD-kortläsaren. Batteritiden är också ett problem. Det går även att spela spel på ConceptD, men den är inte riktigt gjord för det heller.
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
-
02/17/2020 v7
Benjamin Herzig
Pricecompare
