Notebookcheck

Test: Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51 - Lättviktare med Kaby Lake G som kämpar mot nedskärningar (Sammanfattning)

Vit fjäderviktare. För att stå ut från sina konkurrenter provar Acer nya vägar med sin ConceptD 5 CN515-51, som har särskilt lätta material, en Kaby Lake G-processor med en inbyggd AMD GPU och en 4K UHD-skärm med brett färgomfång. Acer ConceptD CN515-51 är dessutom lättare än andra multimedialaptops med 15.6-tumsskärmar. Tyvärr visar sig besparingarna ganska snabbt i vår recension.
Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 (ConceptD 5 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8705G 4 x 3.1 - 4.1 GHz, Kaby Lake-G
Grafikkort
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 - 4096 (shared) MB, Kärna: 1011 MHz, Minne: 700 MHz, Crimson 18.50.06
Minne
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666, fastlött
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixlar 282 PPI, B156ZAN03.1, LTPS IPS LED, glansig: nej
Hårddisk
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, 512 GB 
, M.2 2280, PCIe NVMe, 423 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Anslutningar
4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: SD-kortläsare, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare
Nätverk
Intel Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 17 x 360 x 242
Batteri
48 Wh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 720p
Övrigt
Högtalare: stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet med 6 rader, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Acer Care Center, Acer Collection 5, Acer Jumpstart, App Explorer, Acer ConceptID Palette, Acer Quick Access, eBay, Norton Security Ultra, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.479 kg, Strömförsörjning: 432 g
Pris
1599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83 %
02/2020
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870
1.5 kg17 mm15.6"3840x2160
87 %
08/2019
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2 kg17 mm15.6"3840x2160
90 %
12/2019
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M
2 kg16.2 mm16"3072x1920
87 %
02/2020
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
1.7 kg18.7 mm15.6"3840x2160

Jämförelse av storlek och vikt

361.8 mm 245.7 mm 18.7 mm 1.7 kg360 mm 242 mm 17 mm 1.5 kg358 mm 246 mm 16.2 mm 2 kg357 mm 235 mm 17 mm 2 kg
Vänster: Laddningsport, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0 typ A, USB 3.1 Gen 1 typ C, Kombinerad ljudanslutning
Vänster: Laddningsport, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0 typ A, USB 3.1 Gen 1 typ C, Kombinerad ljudanslutning
Höger: SD-kortläsare, USB 3.0 typ A, Kensington-lås
Höger: SD-kortläsare, USB 3.0 typ A, Kensington-lås
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
172.4 MB/s ∼100% +694%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
164 MB/s ∼95% +656%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 204, n=202)
61.1 MB/s ∼35% +182%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
21.7 MB/s ∼13%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198.6 MB/s ∼100% +673%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192.1 MB/s ∼97% +647%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.2 - 253, n=198)
76.3 MB/s ∼38% +197%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25.7 MB/s ∼13%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1431 (min: 1279, max: 1644) MBit/s ∼100% +269%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
817 (min: 806, max: 821) MBit/s ∼57% +111%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
674 MBit/s ∼47% +74%
Average of class Multimedia
  (44 - 1446, n=170)
564 MBit/s ∼39% +45%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
388 (min: 364, max: 411) MBit/s ∼27%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1431 (min: 566, max: 1523) MBit/s ∼100% +174%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
644 MBit/s ∼45% +23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
581 (min: 533, max: 616) MBit/s ∼41% +11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (46.1 - 1563, n=169)
536 MBit/s ∼37% +2%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
523 (min: 471, max: 572) MBit/s ∼37%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410142014301440145014601470148014901500151015201530154015501560157015801590160016101620163016401650Tooltip
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 Intel Wireless-AC 7265; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø387 (364-411)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Broadcom 802.11ac; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø816 (806-821)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1431 (1279-1644)
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 Intel Wireless-AC 7265; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø524 (471-572)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Broadcom 802.11ac; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø582 (533-616)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (566-1523)
302
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
B156ZAN03.1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 350 cd/m² Medel: 328.7 cd/m² Minimum: 17.5 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 347 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1321:1 (Svärta: 0.265 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.08 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 4.38
ΔE Greyscale 3.62 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
B156ZAN03.1, LTPS IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
APPA044, IPS, 3072x1920, 16
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
NE156QUM-N66, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
95%
15%
25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
63 (32, 31)
2.3 (1.1, 1.2)
96%
52.4 (23.9, 28.5)
17%
46.4 (22, 24.4)
26%
Response Time Black / White *
40 (24, 16)
2.4 (1.1, 1.3)
94%
34.9 (17.8, 17.1)
13%
30.4 (17.2, 13.2)
24%
PWM Frequency
59.52 (100)
131700
Screen
5%
28%
2%
Brightness middle
350
421.2
20%
519
48%
464
33%
Brightness
329
417
27%
477
45%
448
36%
Brightness Distribution
86
94
9%
86
0%
90
5%
Black Level *
0.265
0.39
-47%
0.36
-36%
Contrast
1321
1331
1%
1289
-2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.08
6.06
-19%
2.28
55%
4.2
17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.25
11.89
-16%
6.54
36%
11.4
-11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.38
0.86
80%
0.8
82%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.62
2.8
23%
0.9
75%
7.2
-99%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.15 102%
2145 0%
2.17 101%
CCT
6389 102%
6235 104%
6572 99%
6345 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88
81
-8%
78
-11%
85.2
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99.6
0%
99
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
50% / 23%
22% / 26%
14% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 32 ms rise
↘ 31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18037 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Cache
CPU-Z Cache
CPU-Z Moderkort
CPU-Z Moderkort
CPU-Z Minne
CPU-Z Minne
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610Tooltip
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 Intel Core i7-8705G, Intel Core i7-8705G: Ø767 (760-794)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1314 (1090.6-1600.38)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H; macOS 10.15.1: Ø1407 (1386-1435)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H; Win 10: Ø1296 (1268.87-1362.31)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø982 (967.16-1074.4)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK
201 Points ∼100% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
191 Points ∼95% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
184 Points ∼92% +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
184 Points ∼92% +5%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Intel Core i7-8705G
176 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G
  (165 - 176, n=3)
172 Points ∼86% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 204, n=406)
132 Points ∼66% -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1600 (min: 1090.6, max: 1369.3, 99th percentile: 1367.66) Points ∼100% +98%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1435 (min: 1401, max: 1435) Points ∼90% +77%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1362 (min: 1268.87, max: 1362.31) Points ∼85% +68%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
1074 (min: 967.16, max: 1074.4) Points ∼67% +33%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Intel Core i7-8705G
810 (min: 760, max: 810) Points ∼51%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G
  (733 - 810, n=3)
763 Points ∼48% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (72.4 - 1600, n=425)
524 Points ∼33% -35%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
98.62 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
810 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
176 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
6110 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (4833 - 5493, n=3)
5224 Points ∼85% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5171 Points ∼85% +7%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
4833 Points ∼79%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1001 - 7296, n=132)
3790 Points ∼62% -22%
Productivity
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
7494 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (6786 - 7265, n=3)
6955 Points ∼93% +2%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
6815 Points ∼91%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6489 Points ∼87% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1407 - 8020, n=133)
6353 Points ∼85% -7%
Essentials
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
9701 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (7936 - 9360, n=3)
8527 Points ∼88% +7%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
7936 Points ∼82%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2891 - 10539, n=133)
7819 Points ∼81% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7548 Points ∼78% -5%
Score
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
5500 Points ∼100% +20%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
5469 Points ∼99% +19%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (4583 - 5001, n=3)
4847 Points ∼88% +6%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
4583 Points ∼83%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4535 Points ∼82% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1144 - 5758, n=134)
4079 Points ∼74% -11%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
4812 Points ∼100% +10%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4762 Points ∼99% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (4329 - 4469, n=3)
4386 Points ∼91% +1%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
4359 Points ∼91%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=306)
4340 Points ∼90% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4241 Points ∼88% -3%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
4900 Points ∼100% +38%
Average Intel Core i7-8705G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (3551 - 4235, n=3)
3911 Points ∼80% +10%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3799 Points ∼78% +7%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
3551 Points ∼72%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3417 Points ∼70% -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1371 - 4900, n=327)
3397 Points ∼69% -4%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3551 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4031 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4359 poäng
Hjälp
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Apple SSD AP1024 7171
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Average WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
1%
-7%
11%
4%
Write 4K
120.6
104.3
-14%
55.54
-54%
148.08
23%
130 (109 - 194, n=7)
8%
Read 4K
41.43
45.23
9%
16.21
-61%
47.31
14%
39.9 (29.1 - 51.2, n=7)
-4%
Write Seq
2402
1729
-28%
1959.24
-18%
1414.08
-41%
2249 (1584 - 2540, n=7)
-6%
Read Seq
1997
1861
-7%
1762.83
-12%
1320.24
-34%
1897 (1538 - 2512, n=7)
-5%
Write 4K Q32T1
335.2
509.2
52%
398.51
19%
493.59
47%
396 (331 - 536, n=7)
18%
Read 4K Q32T1
381.7
388.5
2%
648.05
70%
593.94
56%
462 (364 - 603, n=7)
21%
Write Seq Q32T1
2553
2813
10%
2726.7
7%
2969.6
16%
2541 (2535 - 2553, n=7)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3356
2906
-13%
3241.6
-3%
3471.7
3%
3370 (3218 - 3489, n=7)
0%
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Sequential Read: 2464 MB/s
Sequential Write: 2488 MB/s
512K Read: 2060 MB/s
512K Write: 1406 MB/s
4K Read: 44.06 MB/s
4K Write: 174.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 536 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 454.5 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
14725 Points ∼100% +50%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
12388 Points ∼84% +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
10885 Points ∼74% +11%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (9632 - 10118, n=5)
9910 Points ∼67% +1%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, Intel Core i7-8705G
9825 Points ∼67%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 26292, n=668)
3208 Points ∼22% -67%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
3364 Points ∼100% +66%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
3353 Points ∼100% +65%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
2909 Points ∼86% +43%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (2031 - 2108, n=3)
2070 Points ∼62% +2%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, Intel Core i7-8705G
2031 Points ∼60%
Average of class Multimedia
  (142 - 7372, n=89)
1670 Points ∼50% -18%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
10399 Points ∼100% +45%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
8532 Points ∼82% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
7741 Points ∼74% +8%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (7059 - 7355, n=5)
7254 Points ∼70% +1%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, Intel Core i7-8705G
7181 Points ∼69%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 19655, n=445)
3099 Points ∼30% -57%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
65776 Points ∼100% +69%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
45246 Points ∼69% +17%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
  (37915 - 44796, n=5)
40459 Points ∼62% +4%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, Intel Core i7-8705G
38812 Points ∼59%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2468 - 77755, n=442)
17527 Points ∼27% -55%
3DMark 11 Performance
9104 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
15911 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5879 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
2121 poäng
Hjälp
låg med. hög ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 216.3 165.3 148 59.85 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 116.6 75.9 41.3 24.3 14.4 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 105 65 56 38 16 fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB(A)
Hög belastning
32.6 / 40.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.135.23334.335.12536.233.933.534.136.23137.537.837.63637.54030.731.332.233.830.75030.43230.432.230.46333.12929.33133.18031.429.428.628.231.410028.829.328.629.328.812530.328.828.929.330.316026.424.924.224.326.420026.524.122.822.426.525028.723.82222.428.731529.923.921.321.229.940028.422.42020.428.450028.222.219.519.528.263026.120.918.918.726.180027.320.618.918.327.3100032.723.118.217.732.7125030.722.117.817.730.7160030.220.317.617.130.2200030.420.317.717.430.425002920.517.617.429315027.41917.717.627.4400024.419.21817.724.450002318.718.11823630021.319.218.11821.3800020.918.718.218.320.91000020.318.718.118.120.31250018.918.618.118.218.91600018.918.618.118.218.9SPL40.232.630.530.440.2N3.41.81.41.43.4median 27.4median 20.6median 18.2median 18.2median 27.4Delta32.11.92.33hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
Hög belastning
 44.6 °C44.6 °C34.8 °C 
 42.3 °C42.8 °C27.9 °C 
 29.7 °C27 °C25.2 °C 
Max: 44.6 °C
Medel: 35.4 °C
34 °C45.4 °C43.4 °C
24.1 °C39 °C38.6 °C
24.6 °C27.7 °C29.4 °C
Max: 45.4 °C
Medel: 34 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  47.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket sie / Fluke t300 FC
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 38.9 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.7 °C / 85.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-0.7 °C / -1.3 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.634.333.62532.334.132.33137.23637.24032.733.832.75031.332.231.36330.43130.48029.728.229.710029.129.329.112531.629.331.616033.624.333.620032.722.432.72504422.44431550.721.250.740055.520.455.550051.519.551.563057.218.757.280066.318.366.3100066.717.766.7125063.617.763.6160062.917.162.9200067.117.467.1250060.417.460.4315065.117.665.1400060.817.760.8500064.21864.2630065.61865.6800063.118.363.11000058.218.158.21250051.218.251.21600046.318.246.3SPL75.830.475.8N361.436median 58.2median 18.2median 58.2Delta9.62.39.643.54338.839.440.338.137.337.736.538.136.638.536.334.835.335.634.443.134.249.432.846.432.359.531.568.63169.930.268.329.97529.879.229.575.429.173.929.279.528.775.428.477.428.477.928.377.928.370.92876.12874.62875.727.975.327.778.141.188.54.279.6median 29.2median 751.77.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.11 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.28 / 0.45 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 12 / 17.8 / 19.7 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 59 / 87 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, LTPS IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, Apple SSD AP1024 7171, IPS, 3072x1920, 16
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-9%
8%
-11%
2%
5%
Idle Minimum *
12
6.2
48%
3.7
69%
8.5
29%
9.97 (6.2 - 12, n=3)
17%
11.3 (2.1 - 101, n=967)
6%
Idle Average *
17.8
9.6
46%
12.1
32%
14.7
17%
15.8 (12.9 - 17.8, n=3)
11%
15.9 (3 - 122, n=967)
11%
Idle Maximum *
19.7
21.2
-8%
17
14%
19.4
2%
17.4 (13.6 - 19.7, n=3)
12%
19.4 (4.6 - 181, n=967)
2%
Load Average *
59
104.3
-77%
91.5
-55%
89.6
-52%
72.5 (59 - 82.3, n=3)
-23%
60.1 (18.5 - 164, n=946)
-2%
Load Maximum *
87
135.3
-56%
102.3
-18%
129.8
-49%
93.8 (87 - 99.4, n=3)
-8%
78.3 (20.1 - 329, n=951)
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
91.7
103
96.1

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
7tim 42min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
4tim 35min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 max Brightness (Edge)
3tim 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6tim 56min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 25min
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7
i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, 48 Wh
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, 99.8 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 80 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
100%
56%
-14%
5%
Reader / Idle
462
910
97%
423 (73 - 2085, n=911)
-8%
H.264
416
580
39%
284
-32%
374 (114 - 1053, n=113)
-10%
WiFi v1.3
275
467
70%
718
161%
285
4%
373 (96 - 942, n=284)
36%
Load
85
199
134%
58
-32%
72
-15%
86 (32 - 238, n=915)
1%
Witcher 3 ultra
54
72.7 (54 - 94, n=11)

För

+ Låg vikt för en laptop på 15.6 tum
+ Matt 4K UHD-skärm med brett färgomfång
+ Lätt att lägga till en andra SSD-enhet
+ Billigare än konkurrenterna

Emot

- Svagt skärmlock
- Saknar Thunderbolt 3
- Extremt långsam SD-kortläsare
- Fastlött RAM
- Skärmen har inte utlovad ljusstyrka och bakgrundsbelysningen blöder
- Högtalarna är sämre än genomsnittet
- Dålig batteritid
- Prestandabegränsning vid batteridrift
Recension av Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51, recensionsex från
Recension av Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51, recensionsex från

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Med sin ConceptD 5 CN515-51 har Acer skapat en ovanlig multimedialaptop.

Den skiljer sig utseendemässigt från andra enheter i den här klassen och har tack vare sina chassimaterial ett tydligt fokus på låg vikt. Detta är bra, men det svaga skärmlocket blir en negativ sidoeffekt. När det kommer till portarna så har Acer inte inkluderat Thunderbolt 3. Den har dessutom en extremt långsam SD-kortläsare, vilket känns väldigt malplacerat i en såpass dyr multimedialaptop. Detsamma gäller den utdaterade WiFi-modulen som inte ens har stöd för den senaste Bluetooth-standarden. Uppgraderingsmöjligheterna kan vi både ge beröm och kritisera: Även om datorns RAM är fastlött så är det lätt att uppgradera lagringen tack vare en ledig M.2 2280-plats.

Skärmen har ett brett färgomfång, men relativt stark blödning från bakgrundsbelysningen och en ljusstyrka som var lägre än utlovat gjorde oss besvikna. Vad det gäller prestandan så levererar ConceptD ungefär vad vi förväntade oss från Kaby Lake G. Bra prestanda för en multimedialaptop, men många andra modeller med nyare Intel-processorer och dedikerade Nvidia-grafikkort ger bättre prestanda. Tyvärr innebär detta inte att den istället har bättre batteritid. Ett för litet batteri ställer till den ekvationen. Vi får också ge den kritik för spoltjut, att prestandan begränsas vid batteridrift och att högtalarna var sämre än genomsnittet (för en multimedialaptop).

Inte utan kompromisser: Tyvärr har Acer valt att skära ner på kostnaden för nödvändiga komponenter. Den här datorn kan inte tävla med dyrare konkurrenter.

Det känns oklart vem som Acer marknadsför ConceptD 5 CN515-51 åt. De mest uttalade positiva egenskaperna är den låga vikten och den färgglada skärmen. Med dessa styrkor kan den tänkas vara en dröm för varje fotograf. Men fotografer kommer troligen bli extremt irriterade av den långsamma SD-kortläsaren. Batteritiden är också ett problem. Det går även att spela spel på ConceptD, men den är inte riktigt gjord för det heller.

Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 - 02/17/2020 v7
Benjamin Herzig

Design
80 / 98 → 82%
Tangentbord
85%
Mus
89%
Anslutningar
53 / 80 → 67%
Vikt
69 / 20-72 → 95%
Batteri
65 / 95 → 69%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
76 / 90 → 85%
Programprestanda
86 / 90 → 95%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
90 / 95 → 95%
Audio
48%
Camera
28 / 85 → 33%
Medel
73%
83%
Multimedia - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51 - Lättviktare med Kaby Lake G som kämpar mot nedskärningar (Sammanfattning)
Benjamin Herzig, 2020-02-24 (Update: 2020-02-24)
Benjamin Herzig
Editor of the original article: Benjamin Herzig - Editor